Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 1.421
1.
Pak J Biol Sci ; 27(4): 168-181, 2024 Mar.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38812108

<b>Background and Objective:</b> Prenatal ionizing radiation exposure may hinder fetal and embryonic growth depending on the dose and gestational age. The current study's objective was to discover how bone marrow transplants affected the spleens of pregnant rats that had been subjected to γ (Gamma) radiation. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Sixty rats that were pregnant were separated into five different groups, each with 6 females. The pregnant rats in the second Group were exposed to 2Gy of γ-rays. Group III; pregnant rats subjected to 2Gy of γ-rays, followed by an intraperitoneal injection of newly prepared bone marrow transplantation (BMT). The fifth Group were exposed to 2Gy γ-rays and received 1 dosage of BMT an hour later. Spleen samples from the pregnant rats as well as their fetuses were taken for histological and histochemical analyses. <b>Results:</b> Gamma rays damaged the splenic tissue of women and their fetuses on days 7 or 14 of pregnancy in a variety of histological and histochemical ways, although bone marrow transplantation significantly reduced the damage. Treated mothers with bone marrow post-radiation showed a noticeable recovery in spleen of their fetuses. Improved spleen architecture was accompanied by appearance of normal content of collagen, polysaccharides and total protein in the fetal spleen tissue especially on day 7 of gestation. <b>Conclusion:</b> Bone marrow transplantation can lessen the damage caused by gamma radiation.


Bone Marrow Transplantation , Fetus , Gamma Rays , Spleen , Animals , Female , Pregnancy , Spleen/radiation effects , Spleen/metabolism , Rats , Fetus/radiation effects
2.
Clin Nucl Med ; 49(7): 605-609, 2024 Jul 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38778468

PURPOSE: Data published in the literature concerning the doses received by fetuses exposed to a 18 F-FDG PET are reassuring but were obtained from small and heterogeneous cohorts, and very few data are available concerning the fetal dose received after exposure to both PET and CT. The present study aimed to estimate the fetal dose received following a PET/CT exposure using methods that include anthropomorphic phantoms of pregnant women applied on a large cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study included 18 pregnant patients in the second and third trimesters. For PET exposure, the fetal volume and mean concentration of radioactivity in the fetus were measured by manually drawing regions of interest. Those data, combined with the time-integrated activities of the fetus and the mother's organs, were entered into the OLINDA/EXM software 2.0 to assess the fetal dose due to PET exposure. To estimate the fetal dose received due to CT exposure, 2 softwares were used: CT-Expo (based on geometric phantom models of nonpregnant patients) and VirtualDose (using pregnant patient phantoms). RESULTS: The fetal dose exposure for PET/CT examination in the second trimester ranged from 5.7 to 15.8 mGy using CT-Expo (mean, 11.6 mGy) and from 5.1 to 11.6 mGy using VirtualDose (mean, 8.6 mGy). In the third trimester, it ranged from 7.9 to 16.6 mGy using CT-Expo (mean, 10.7 mGy) and from 6.1 to 10.7 mGy using VirtualDose (mean, 7.6 mGy). CONCLUSIONS: The estimated fetal doses were in the same range of those previously published and are well below the threshold for deterministic effects. Pregnancy does not constitute an absolute contraindication for a clinically justified hybrid 18 F-FDG PET/CT.


Fetus , Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , Pregnancy Trimester, Second , Pregnancy Trimester, Third , Radiation Dosage , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Fetus/diagnostic imaging , Fetus/radiation effects , Adult , Phantoms, Imaging , Retrospective Studies
3.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 200(8): 791-801, 2024 Jun 03.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38777801

Fetal development is essential to the human lifespan. As more and more multifetal gestations have been reported recently, clinical diagnosis using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which introduced radiofrequency (RF) exposure, raised public concerns. The present study developed two whole-body pregnant models of 31 and 32 gestational weeks (GWs) with twin fetuses and explored RF exposure by 1.5 and 3.0 T MRI. Differences in the relative position of the fetus and changes in fetal weight can cause differences in fetal peak local specific absorption rate averaged over 10 g tissue (pSAR10g). Variation of pSAR10g due to different fetal positions can be ~35%. Numerically, twin and singleton fetal pSAR10g results were not significantly different, however twin results exceeded the limit in some cases (e.g. fetuses of 31 GW at 1.5 T), which indicated the necessity for further research employing anatomically correct twin-fetal models coming from various GWs and particular sequence to be applied.


Fetus , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Radio Waves , Humans , Pregnancy , Female , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Fetus/radiation effects , Fetus/diagnostic imaging , Twins , Gestational Age , Fetal Development/radiation effects
4.
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol ; 68(4): 385-392, 2024 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38687690

INTRODUCTION: While there are many papers on maternal and foetal radiation doses from computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) lung scanning examinations for diagnosing pulmonary embolism in pregnant patients, few have used clinical data to examine the patient lifetime attributable risk (LAR) of different cancer types. This paper aims to estimate the cancer risk from maternal radiation doses from CTPA and V/Q examinations and associated foetal doses. METHODS: Dosimetric data were determined for 267 pregnant patients who received CTPA and/or V/Q examinations over 8 years. Organ and foetal doses were determined using software allowing patient size variations for CTPA and using two different activity-to-organ dose conversion methods for V/Q scans. The LAR of cancer incidence was estimated using International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) modelling including estimates of detriment. RESULTS: Estimated total cancer incidence was 23 and 22 cases per 100,000 for CTPA and V/Q examinations, respectively, with detriment estimates of 18 and 20 cases. Cancer incidence was evenly divided between lung and breast cancer for CTPA with lung cancer being 80% of all cancer for V/Q. The median foetal doses were 0.03 mSv for CTPA and 0.29 mSv for V/Q. Significant differences in estimated foetal dose for V/Q scans were obtained by the two different methods used. The differences in dose between the modes of CTPA scan acquisition highlight the importance of optimisation. CONCLUSION: Maternal cancer incidence and detriment were remarkably similar for each examination. Optimisation of examinations is critical for low-dose outcomes, particularly for CTPA examination.


Computed Tomography Angiography , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced , Pulmonary Embolism , Radiation Dosage , Humans , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnostic imaging , Female , Pregnancy , Computed Tomography Angiography/methods , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Ventilation-Perfusion Scan , Incidence , Risk Assessment , Fetus/diagnostic imaging , Fetus/radiation effects , Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular/diagnostic imaging
5.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 200(6): 580-587, 2024 Apr 20.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38486458

This study aimed to assess fetal radiation exposure in pregnant women undergoing computed tomography (CT) and rotational angiography (RA) examinations for the diagnosis of pelvic trauma. In addition, this study aimed to compare the dose distributions between the two examinations. Surface and average fetal doses were estimated during CT and RA examinations using a pregnant phantom model and real-time dosemeters. The pregnant model phantom was constructed using an anthropomorphic phantom, and a custom-made abdominal phantom was used to simulate pregnancy. The total average fetal dose received by pregnant women from both CT scans (plain, arterial and equilibrium phases) and a single RA examination was ~60 mGy. Because unnecessary repetition of radiographic examinations, such as CT or conventional 2D angiography can increase the radiation risk, the irradiation range should be limited, if necessary, to reduce overall radiation exposure.


Fetus , Pelvis , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Exposure , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Radiation Exposure/analysis , Fetus/radiation effects , Fetus/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Pelvis/diagnostic imaging , Pelvis/radiation effects , Angiography/methods , Adult
6.
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci ; 55(2): 264-271, 2024 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38553300

PURPOSE: To measure the out-of-field doses for various treatment planning techniques and assess the impact on fetal dose with and without the use of custom shielding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of six treatment plans were generated with different treatment techniques such as 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT), intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), utilizing both 6 MV flattened beams and flattening filter-free (FFF) beams. The measurements were carried out both out-of-field at the surface and at depth to assess the dose reduction achieved by removing the flattening filter and incorporating shielding. RESULTS: The custom-made frame shielding can effectively reduce the surface dose with a maximum reduction of 15.2% observed in VMAT plans and achieve a maximum reduction of 100% for cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging. Out-of-field dose measurements conducted at depth, positioned 58 cm inferior to the target isocenter, reveal that the shielding effectiveness consistently remains the greatest for 3DCRT technique. A maximum reduction of 21% is observed when utilizing a flattening filter-free beam. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that the 3DCRT technique exhibits the least amount of scatter radiation both near and far from the treatment isocenter, which is the most suitable approach for radiation therapy of pregnant patients. In cases where meeting dose constraints for critical organs becomes challenging, VMAT technique emerges as the most suitable treatment technique for reducing out-of-field doses. Additionally, a flattening filter-free beam significantly reduces out-of-field doses due to lower contributions from head scatter.


Fetus , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiation Protection , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods , Fetus/radiation effects , Radiation Protection/methods , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Pregnancy Complications, Neoplastic/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy, Conformal/methods
7.
Electromagn Biol Med ; 43(1-2): 71-80, 2024 Apr 02.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38366892

To investigate curcumin (CUR) as the protector against the harmful effects of low-frequency electromagnetic field(LF- EMF, 50 Hz) during pregnancy period, 5 males and 15 females of Wistar rat mated and vaginal plaques were observed. Then, the pregnant rats were divided into six groups. During pregnancy(21 days), the EMF group was exposed to EMF for 30 min/day, the CUR group received a single dose of 50 mg/kg/daily CUR intraperitoneal, the EMF+CUR group was injected CUR and exposed to EMF daily. The DMSO(dimethyl sulfoxide) group was injected solvent of CUR (DMSO) intraperitoneal with the same volume of CUR solvent, the sham group was placed through the solenoid in the same conditions as the first group without exposure and the control group was kept in their cage in normal condition. After four weeks, babies born were divided according to the mother groups and sacrificed. Then, the three tissues injuries were investigated. EMF exposure led to an increase in outstanding necrotic areas in hippocampal tissue, an increase in the amount of hyperemia(p = 0.017) and necrotic(p = 0.005) in kidneys, and degeneration in liver tissue(p = 0.007) in the EMF group compared with EMF+CUR groups. A single dose of CUR daily during pregnancy can protect these tissues from injuries caused by LF-EMF exposure in rat fetuses.


Electromagnetic fields (EMFs) are able to penetrate and be absorbed by the body. The researchers showed that these radiations might be harmful and lead to cancers, cardiovascular diseases, mental disorders, and fetal abnormalities. Curcumin as an active component in turmeric has anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and anti-hyperlipidemia properties. It can protect the body against diseases such as arthritis, anxiety, and metabolic syndrome. This study examined the effects of curcumin as the protector against the harmful effects of EMF (50Hz) during pregnancy period. So the pregnant rats were divided into six groups. During pregnancy, a group was exposed to EMF for 30 min/day, the second group was injected a dose of curcumin 50mg/kg/daily, the third group was injected curcumin and exposed to EMF daily. The fourth group was injected a curcumin solvent dose, the sham group was placed through the field generator in the same conditions as the first group without exposure and the control group was kept in their cage in normal condition. After four weeks, babies born were divided according to the mother groups and sacrificed. Then, the liver, kidney, and hippocampal tissues were investigated. EMF exposure led to an outstanding increase in necrotic areas in hippocampal tissue, a notable increase in the amount of hyperemia and necrosis in kidneys, and degeneration in liver tissue(p=0.007) in the EMF group compared with the third group that was exposed to EMF and received curcumin. A single dose of curcumin daily during pregnancy can protect these tissues from injuries caused by EMF(50Hz) exposure in rat fetuses.


Curcumin , Electromagnetic Fields , Fetus , Rats, Wistar , Animals , Curcumin/pharmacology , Pregnancy , Female , Electromagnetic Fields/adverse effects , Rats , Fetus/radiation effects , Fetus/drug effects , Male , Hippocampus/radiation effects , Hippocampus/drug effects , Liver/radiation effects , Liver/drug effects
8.
Phys Eng Sci Med ; 47(2): 531-538, 2024 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38206532

With the rising use of Computed Tomography (CT) in diagnostic radiology, there are concerns regarding radiation exposure to sensitive groups, including pregnant patients. Accurately determining the radiation dose to the fetus during CT scans is essential to balance diagnostic efficacy with patient safety. This study assessed the accuracy of using the female uterus as a surrogate for fetal radiation dose during CT imaging. The study used common CT protocols to encompass various scenarios, including primary beam, scatter, and partial exposure. The computational program NCICT was used to calculate radiation doses for an adult female and a fetus phantom. The study highlighted that using the uterus for dose estimation can result in consistent underestimations of the effective dose, particularly when the fetus lies within the primary radiation beam. These discrepancies may influence clinical decisions, affecting care strategies and perceptions of associated risks. In conclusion, while the female uterus can indicate fetal radiation dose if the fetus is outside the primary beam, it is unreliable when the fetus is within the primary beam. More reliable abdomen/pelvic organs were recommended.


Fetus , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiation Dosage , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Fetus/diagnostic imaging , Fetus/radiation effects , Uterus/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Radiation Exposure
9.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 25(2): e14256, 2024 Feb.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38175957

In the context of radiation oncology, radiation exposure from radiation therapy simulation, image guidance, and radiation therapy procedures can have severe adverse biological effects on a developing embryo or fetus. Patients who may be pregnant are screened for the possibility of pregnancy to prevent unnecessary or excessive exposure of radiation in utero. Some radiation therapy patients for whom a pregnancy test is indicated may elect to decline the test. In addition, some patients who are found upon screening to be pregnant may decide, with their attending radiation oncologist, to continue with treatment. A radiation oncology department policy was developed to provide guidelines regarding screening and consent. The policy was designed to prevent unnecessary exposure to patients who may be pregnant, and to limit dose to the embryo or fetus in patients for whom treatment is medically indicated. The policy is presented as an example for physicists intending to develop or revise their own practice's policy regarding patients who may become pregnant.


Radiation Exposure , Radiation Oncology , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Fetus/radiation effects , Radiation Dosage
10.
Health Phys ; 125(4): 245-259, 2023 10 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37358430

ABSTRACT: Organ dosimetry data of the atomic bomb survivors and the resulting cancer risk models derived from these data are currently assessed within the DS02 dosimetry system developed through the Joint US-Japan Dosimetry Working Group. In DS02, the anatomical survivor models are limited to three hermaphroditic stylized phantoms-an adult (55 kg), a child (19.8 kg), and an infant (9.7 kg)-that were originally designed for the preceding DS86 dosimetry system. As such, organ doses needed for assessment of in-utero cancer risks to the fetus have continued to rely upon the use of the uterine wall in the adult non-pregnant stylized phantom as the dose surrogate for all fetal organs regardless of gestational age. To address these limitations, the Radiation Effects Research Foundation (RERF) Working Group on Organ Dose (WGOD) has established the J45 (Japan 1945) series of high-resolution voxel phantoms, which were derived from the UF/NCI series of hybrid phantoms and scaled to match mid-1940s Japanese body morphometries. The series includes male and female phantoms-newborn to adult-and four pregnant female phantoms at gestational ages of 8, 15, 25, and 38 wk post-conception. In previous studies, we have reported organ dose differences between those reported by the DS02 system and those computed by the WGOD using 3D Monte Carlo radiation transport simulations of atomic bomb gamma-ray and neutron fields for the J45 phantoms series in their traditional "standing" posture, with some variations in their facing direction relative to the bomb hypocenter. In this present study, we present the J45 pregnant female phantoms in both a "kneeling" and "lying" posture and assess the dosimetric impact of these more anatomically realistic survivor models in comparison to current organ doses given by the DS02 system. For the kneeling phantoms facing the bomb hypocenter, organ doses from bomb source photon spectra were shown to be overestimated by the DS02 system by up to a factor of 1.45 for certain fetal organs and up to a factor of 1.17 for maternal organs. For lying phantoms with their feet in the direction of the hypocenter, fetal organ doses from bomb source photon spectra were underestimated by the DS02 system by factors as low as 0.77, while maternal organ doses were overestimated by up to a factor of 1.38. Organs doses from neutron contributions to the radiation fields exhibited an increasing overestimation by the DS02 stylized phantoms as gestational age increased. These discrepancies are most evident in fetal organs that are more posterior within the mother's womb, such as the fetal brain. Further analysis revealed that comparison of these postures to the original standing posture indicate significant dose differences for both maternal and fetal organ doses depending on the type of irradiation. Results from this study highlight the degree to which the existing DS02 system can differ from organ dosimetry based upon 3D radiation transport simulations using more anatomically realistic models of those survivors exposed during pregnancy.


Atomic Bomb Survivors , Radiation Injuries , Infant, Newborn , Child , Adult , Pregnancy , Humans , Male , Female , Radiometry/methods , Fetus/radiation effects , Posture
11.
Abdom Radiol (NY) ; 48(5): 1564-1578, 2023 05.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36933026

PURPOSE: To review the effects of ionizing radiation to the conceptus and the relationship to the timing of the exposure during pregnancy. To consider strategies that would mitigate potential harms associated with exposure to ionizing radiation during pregnancy. METHODS: Data reported in the peer-reviewed literature on entrance KERMA received from specific radiological examinations were combined with published results from experiment or Monte Carlo modeling of tissue and organ doses per entrance KERMA to estimate total doses that could be received from specific procedures. Data reported in the peer-reviewed literature on dose mitigation strategies, best practices for shielding, consent, counseling and emerging technologies were reviewed. RESULTS: For procedures utilizing ionizing radiation for which the conceptus is not included in the primary radiation beam, typical doses are well below the threshold for causing tissue reactions and the risk of induction of childhood cancer is low. For procedures that include the conceptus in the primary radiation field, longer fluoroscopic interventional procedures or multiphase/multiple exposures potentially could approach or exceed thresholds for tissue reactions and the risk of cancer induction must be weighed against the expected risk/benefit of performing (or not) the imaging examination. Gonadal shielding is no longer considered best practice. Emerging technologies such as whole-body DWI/MRI, dual-energy CT and ultralow dose studies are gaining importance for overall dose reduction strategies. CONCLUSION: The ALARA principle, considering potential benefits and risks should be followed with respect to the use of ionizing radiation. Nevertheless, as Wieseler et al. (2010) state, "no examination should be withheld when an important clinical diagnosis is under consideration." Best practices require updates on current available technologies and guidelines.


Fetus , Radiation Exposure , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Radiation Dosage , Fetus/radiation effects , Radiography , Radiation, Ionizing
12.
Abdom Radiol (NY) ; 48(5): 1774-1783, 2023 05.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36639533

PURPOSE: Pregnant patients present a unique challenge to cancer therapy. Due to the potential catastrophic implications related to teratogenic effects or pregnancy loss, oncologic management of this vulnerable patient group must be strategic and personalized. METHODS: This article will discuss the unique treatment approach to the pregnant cancer patient. This includes discussion of the role of imaging during staging, treatment, and follow-up with an emphasis on avoiding ionizing radiation when possible. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Specific considerations and modifications to standard cancer treatments, including surgery and systemic therapies such as chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted and hormone therapies are crucial components of providing oncologic care to minimize negative effects to the mother and developing fetus. Radiation and proton therapy are also options that may be employed in specific circumstances. Finally, this article will address the long-term treatment effects of these therapies on future fertility.


Pregnancy Complications, Neoplastic , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Pregnancy Complications, Neoplastic/diagnostic imaging , Pregnancy Complications, Neoplastic/therapy , Fetus/radiation effects , Medical Oncology
13.
Phys Med ; 105: 102513, 2023 Jan.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36565555

This paper aims to review on fetal dose in radiotherapy and extends and updates on a previous work1 to include proton therapy. Out-of-field doses, which are the doses received by regions outside of the treatment field, are unavoidable regardless of the treatment modalities used during radiotherapy. In the case of pregnant patients, fetal dose is a major concern as it has long been recognized that fetuses exposed to radiation have a higher probability of suffering from adverse effects such as anatomical malformations and even fetal death, especially when the 0.1Gy threshold is exceeded. In spite of the low occurrence of cancer during pregnancy, the radiotherapy team should be equipped with the necessary knowledge to deal with fetal dose. This is crucial so as to ensure that the fetus is adequately protected while not compromising the patient treatment outcomes. In this review paper, various aspects of fetal dose will be discussed ranging from biological, clinical to the physics aspects. Other than fetal dose resulting from conventional photon therapy, this paper will also extend the discussion to modern treatment modalities and techniques, namely proton therapy and image-guided radiotherapy, all of which have seen a significant increase in use in current radiotherapy. This review is expected to provide readers with a comprehensive understanding of fetal dose in radiotherapy, and to be fully aware of the steps to be taken in providing radiotherapy for pregnant patients.


Fetus , Pregnancy Complications, Neoplastic , Radiotherapy Dosage , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Fetus/radiation effects , Proton Therapy/adverse effects , Pregnancy Complications, Neoplastic/radiotherapy
14.
J Radiat Res ; 64(1): 99-104, 2023 Jan 20.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36420765

Although mammalian fetuses have been suggested to be sensitive to radiation, an increased frequency of translocations was not observed in blood lymphocytes from atomic bomb (A-bomb) survivors who were exposed to the bomb in utero and examined as adults. Since experiments using hematopoietic cells of mice and rats confirmed this finding, it was hypothesized that either irradiated fetal hematopoietic stem cells (f-HSCs) cannot generate exchange-type chromosomal aberrations or cells bearing induced aberrations are eliminated before the animals reach adulthood. In the present study, pregnant mice (12.5-15.5 days post coitum [dpc]) were irradiated with 2 Gy of X-rays and long-term HSCs (LT-HSCs) were isolated 24 h later. Multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization (mFISH) analysis of LT-HSC clones proliferated in vitro showed that nine out of 43 (21%) clones from fetuses and 21 out of 41 (51%) clones from mothers bore translocations. These results indicate that cells with translocations can arise in mouse f-HSCs but exist at a lower frequency than in the mothers 24 h after X-ray exposure. Thus, it seems likely that translocation-bearing f-HSCs are generated but subsequently disappear, so that the frequency of lymphocyte translocations may decrease and reach the control level by the time the animals reach adulthood.


Chromosome Aberrations , Translocation, Genetic , Pregnancy , Female , Rats , Animals , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Hematopoietic Stem Cells , Fetus/radiation effects , Mammals
15.
J Am Dent Assoc ; 153(10): 989-995, 2022 10.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35985884

BACKGROUND: The safety of dental radiography performed on pregnant patients has been a controversial topic since the 1960s. This review synthesizes and consolidates findings, from 1957 through 2021, of the effects dental ionizing radiation could have on a pregnant patient and in utero birth defects. TYPES OF STUDIES REVIEWED: Using PubMed, the following key words were searched: pregnancy, radiology, radiograph, radiation dose, fetus, x-ray, and dental. Criteria evaluation was done on the basis of availability, completeness, quality, relevance, technicality (that is, dental radiography), topicality (that is, pregnant patients), and usability. These results were then filtered on the basis of quantitative and qualitative data as well as the period (decades within the historical framework). The final selection of relevant literature consisted of various studies including cohort studies, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, case reports, and other narrative reviews. RESULTS: If properly performed, the amount of ionizing radiation produced during dental radiographic procedures is so low that it is unlikely to reach the teratogenic threshold. Thus, dental ionizing radiation is unlikely to cause in utero birth defects because it has been detected to have a deterministic (not stochastic) effect. With this information and historical context, this article shows that necessary dental radiography is safe at any stage during pregnancy, as long as proper safety equipment is appropriately used. CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: As technology advances, more research can further clarify ionizing radiation safety for pregnant patients and its potential effects on in utero birth defects, improving overall oral health care. The dental community must remain educated about current ionizing radiation safety guidelines to make better-informed decisions and successfully provide proper oral health care to pregnant patients.


Fetus , Radiation, Ionizing , Female , Fetus/radiation effects , Humans , Pregnancy , Radiation Dosage , Radiography, Dental/adverse effects
16.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 1662022 03 17.
Article Nl | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35499549

Diagnostic imaging in pregnant patients often causes worries about radiation effects and IV contrast. We use a step-by-step plan to choose the right method and illustrate this with a case. First, we choose the method of imaging, non-ionizing imaging being preferred over ionizing. With ionizing radiation, the fetal dose is limited as much as possible with teratogenic and carcinogenic risk as low as possible (as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA)). The second consideration is whether intravenous contrast medium is necessary. The risks of the imaging procedure for the fetus (and patient) are compared with the risks for the patient (and fetus) without imaging. Furthermore, possible treatment changes are important. Finally, the patient is informed about the procedure, the necessity of it and possible negative effects for the fetus and patient. In our case these risks were minimal and it was not necessary to explicitly discuss them with the patient.


Radiation Injuries , Contrast Media , Female , Fetus/diagnostic imaging , Fetus/radiation effects , Humans , Pregnancy , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Radiation, Ionizing
17.
Cancer Radiother ; 26(1-2): 417-423, 2022.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34953688

We present the updated recommendations of the French society for radiation oncology on radiotherapy and pregnancy. The occurrence of cancer during pregnancy is a rare event (approximately 1 in 1000 pregnancies). The risks for the embryo or the foetus depend on the gestational age at the time of irradiation. The main risks are malformations with microcephaly and mental retardation. There is also a risk of radiation-induced cancer in the unborn child. In the case of only supradiaphragmatic irradiation, radiotherapy can be performed most often in pregnant women without risk to the foetus. On the other hand, in the case of an indication for subdiaphragmatic irradiation, therapeutic termination of the pregnancy should be proposed. In all cases, when radiotherapy is chosen, a phantom estimation of the dose delivered to the foetus, confirmed by in vivo measurement, is recommended. Conformational radiotherapy is the preferred technique because of the lower dose delivered to the foetus (except in tumour locations where other techniques such as IMRT are recommended).


Pregnancy Complications, Neoplastic/radiotherapy , Abortion, Therapeutic , Female , Fertility/radiation effects , Fetus/radiation effects , France , Gestational Age , Humans , Intellectual Disability/etiology , Microcephaly/etiology , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Pregnancy , Proton Therapy/methods , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Exposure/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Injuries/complications , Radiation Oncology , Radiotherapy, Conformal/methods
18.
Probl Radiac Med Radiobiol ; 26: 188-198, 2021 Dec.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34965548

OBJECTIVE: To describe the status and results of thyroid disease screening and assessment of reliability of radiationthyroid doses in the Belarusian in utero cohort of 2,965 individuals exposed to Chernobyl (Chornobyl) fallout. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thyroid screening examinations are currently underway including thyroid palpation by anendocrinologist, ultrasonographic examination by an ultrasonographer and analysis of blood samples for diagnosisof hypo- and hyperthyroidism, autoimmune thyroiditis, thyroid function tests (thyroid-stimulating hormone [TSH],thyroxine [T4], thyroid peroxidase antibody [anti-TPO], and thyroglobulin antibodies [anti-TG]). Reliability of (i)information from 780 pairs of questionnaires obtained during the first and second interviews of the mothers and (ii)thyroid doses, which were calculated for the cohort members using this information, is evaluated. RESULTS: As of 15 August 2021, 1,267 in utero exposed study subjects had been screened. A single thyroid nodule wasdiagnosed in 167 persons (13.2 % of the total) and multiple thyroid nodules in 101 persons (8.0 %): 189 (14.9 %)persons had nodules detected for the first time at the screening while 79 (6.2 %) persons had nodules detected pre-viously (pre-screening nodules). Fifty-nine out of 268 subjects (22.0 %) with a suspicious thyroid nodule werereferred to fine needle aspiration biopsy, and among them 33 (55.9 %) were biopsied. Reasonable agreement wasobserved for modelqbased doses calculated for the Belarusian in utero cohort members using data from the two inter-views (Spearman's rank-correlation coefficient rs = 0.74, p < 0.001), while measurementqbased doses yielded almost per-fect agreement (rs = 0.99, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: During the thyroid screening, at least one thyroid nodule was identified in 268 of 1,267 (21.2 %) inutero exposed cohort members. Seven thyroid cancer cases were identified in the cohort, including 5 pre-screeningcases and 2 cases detected during the screening. Ongoing research on this unique cohort will provide importantinformation on adverse health effects following prenatal and postnatal exposure to radioiodine and radiocesium iso-topes, for which available epidemiological data are scant.


Chernobyl Nuclear Accident , Fetus/radiation effects , Pregnant Women , Radiation Dosage , Radioactive Fallout/adverse effects , Thyroid Gland/physiopathology , Thyroid Gland/radiation effects , Thyroid Nodule/physiopathology , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Maternal Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects , Reproducibility of Results , Republic of Belarus , Thyroid Nodule/epidemiology , Thyroid Nodule/etiology , Ukraine
19.
Mutagenesis ; 36(4): 303-309, 2021 08 27.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34086940

Radiation exposure in utero is known to lead to serious concerns to both the mother and children, including developmental anomalies in the children. In the recent past, trichostatin A, an HDAC (histone deacetylase) inhibitor and epigenetic modifier, has been shown to mitigate radiation-induced anomalies in the male reproductive system of C57BL/6 mice. Therefore, the current study was undertaken to evaluate the mitigating effects of trichostatin A (TSA) against radiation-induced developmental anomalies in mice. Foetuses of in utero whole-body gamma-irradiated mice during the active organogenesis period were examined for developmental anomalies at 8.5 and 18.5 days of gestation. In utero radiation exposure caused developmental anomalies like microcephaly, microphthalmia, gastroschisis and kinky tail besides prenatal mortality. TSA administration post-irradiation was observed to reduce 50% of prenatal mortality at E18.5 by reducing congenital and developmental anomalies. Observation of such results could be corroborated with the HDAC inhibitory potential of TSA knowing that developmental anomalies may have epigenetic origin. TSA, therefore, can be considered as a potential radiomitigator.


Fetus/radiation effects , Gamma Rays/adverse effects , Hydroxamic Acids/therapeutic use , Teratogenesis , Animals , Epigenesis, Genetic , Female , Fetus/drug effects , Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL
20.
Radiat Oncol ; 16(1): 109, 2021 Jun 13.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34120633

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to propose a new foetal shielding device for pregnant cancer patients to reduce the foetal dose associated with treatment techniques using multiple gantry angles, such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). METHODS: Three shielding structures were designed to minimise the scattered and leaked radiation from various gantry angles and radiation scattering within the patient. The base-plate part that can be placed on the treatment couch was designed to reduce the scattered and leaked radiation generated at gantry angles located near 180°. A body shielding part that can cover the lower chest and abdomen was designed, and a neck-shielding structure was added to reduce the internal and external radiation scattering from the treatment area. Evaluation plans were generated to assess the foetal dose reduction by the foetal shielding device in terms of the shielding material thickness, distance from the field edge, and shielding component using the flattened 6 MV photon beam (6MV) and flattening filter-free 6 MV photon beam (6MV-FFF). In addition, the effectiveness of the foetal shielding device was evaluated in a pregnant brain tumour patient. RESULTS: The shielding material consisting of three parts was placed on frames composed of four arch shapes with a vertical curved structure, connection bar at the top position, and base plate. Each shielding part resulted in reductions in the radiation dose according to the treatment technique, as the thickness of the shielding material increased and the foetal dose decreased. In addition, a foetal dose reduction of approximately 50% was confirmed at 50 cm from the field edge by using the designed shielding device in most delivery techniques. In patients, the newly designed shielding structures can effectively eliminate up to about 49% of the foetal dose generated from various gantry angles used in VMAT or IMRT. CONCLUSIONS: We designed a foetal shielding device consisting of three parts to effectively reduce the dose delivered to the foetus, and evaluated the device with various treatment techniques for a pregnant patient with brain tumour. The foetal shielding device shielded the scattered/leaked radiation from the treatment machine, and also effectively reduced internal scattering from the treatment area in the patient.


Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Fetus/radiation effects , Phantoms, Imaging , Pregnancy Complications, Neoplastic/prevention & control , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Radiation Protection/instrumentation , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Organs at Risk/radiation effects , Pregnancy , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods , Scattering, Radiation , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
...