Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 5.781
Filter
2.
Nutrients ; 16(17)2024 Sep 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39275351

ABSTRACT

The bloody stools of newborns may be a clue for several clinical entities of varying severity, ranging from idiopathic neonatal transient colitis to food-protein-induced allergic proctocolitis (FPIAP) or necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Distinguishing among them at an early stage is challenging but crucial, as the treatments and prognoses are different. We conducted a monocentric retrospective study including all pre-term infants with bloody stools admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of the Vittore Buzzi Children's Hospital (Milan) from December 2022 to May 2024. Patients diagnosed with NEC exhibited significantly lower eosinophil counts and higher procalcitonin levels than both patients with FPIAP and patients with idiopathic neonatal transient colitis, as well as a statistically significant increase in pathological features from abdomen ultrasounds and abdominal X-rays. In contrast, no lab markers or imaging techniques have been demonstrated to be useful in distinguishing between idiopathic neonatal transient colitis and FPIAP. Thus, after excluding a diagnosis of NEC, the only way to confirm FPIAP is through the oral food challenge, which can be performed in premature newborns presenting with bloody stools who are otherwise healthy and under medical supervision, in order to identify infants who may benefit from a cow's-milk-free diet.


Subject(s)
Enterocolitis, Necrotizing , Infant, Premature , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Proctocolitis , Humans , Proctocolitis/diagnosis , Proctocolitis/etiology , Infant, Newborn , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Enterocolitis, Necrotizing/diagnosis , Enterocolitis, Necrotizing/etiology , Feces/chemistry , Dietary Proteins/administration & dosage , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Food Hypersensitivity/complications , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential
6.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr ; 149(18): 1080-1088, 2024 Sep.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39208860

ABSTRACT

Food allergies are divided into 2 main categories: IgE-mediated and non-IgE-mediated food allergies. Both forms can have significant health effects but differ in mechanism, symptoms, and management. The manifestation of the 2 forms differs between children and adults. These differences can be observed in the prevalence and the type of most common allergens and clinical presentation. The prevalence of food allergies has increased worldwide in recent decades. IgE-mediated allergies are the best researched and documented. They are particularly common in children, while non-IgE-mediated allergies are less well understood and diagnosed, leading to uncertainty about their prevalence. They often manifest as gastrointestinal symptoms that can occur hours to days after ingestion and are often difficult to distinguish from other food intolerances. The occurrence of food allergies varies significantly geographically. Differences in dietary habits, food composition, and environmental factors can partly explain these differences. There are also indications that genetics may play a role. IgE-mediated and non-IgE-mediated food allergies represent a significant and growing challenge for the global healthcare system. This article provides an in-depth review of both types of food allergy, discussing their potential causes, diagnostic possibilities, and available therapeutic strategies. Some diseases represent a mixed form of IgE and non-IgE-mediated immunological adverse reactions. Eosinophilic oesophagitis is the most common eosinophilic disease, and the diagnosis and treatment options are explained in more detail below.


Subject(s)
Food Hypersensitivity , Immunoglobulin E , Humans , Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , Food Hypersensitivity/therapy , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Child , Adult , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/immunology , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/diagnosis , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/therapy , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/etiology , Allergens/immunology
9.
Kobe J Med Sci ; 70(3): E89-E92, 2024 Aug 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39107965

ABSTRACT

Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) caused by fish and others is prevalent in the Mediterranean regions but is less frequently reported in Japan. This case report describes a 3-year-old Japanese girl who developed FPIES triggered by multiple seafoods, including swordfish, cod, and squid. The diagnosis was confirmed through oral food challenge tests (OFC), which led to repeated vomiting and an increase in thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC) levels. This case highlights the importance of considering fish-induced FPIES in the differential diagnosis of recurrent vomiting in children and suggests the potential utility of TARC levels in diagnosing and monitoring FPIES.


Subject(s)
Enterocolitis , Food Hypersensitivity , Seafood , Humans , Enterocolitis/etiology , Enterocolitis/diagnosis , Female , Child, Preschool , Seafood/adverse effects , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Food Hypersensitivity/complications , Food Hypersensitivity/etiology , Japan , Animals , Syndrome , Chemokine CCL17/blood , Decapodiformes , East Asian People
10.
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 58(8): 1278-1284, 2024 Aug 06.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39142900

ABSTRACT

Food allergy are triggered by an abnormal immune response to specific food components, with milk and eggs being the most common food allergens, especially in children. Food allergy can cause various symptoms such as rashes, difficulty breathing, and digestive issues. Allergen component diagnostics is a technique used to identify specific allergenic proteins, aiding doctors in providing more precise treatment and management recommendations for patients. This article analyzes the latest research developments and clinical significance of milk and egg allergen components based on the " Molecular Allergology User's Guide 2.0 (MAUG 2.0)" issued by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI), including their applications in clinical diagnosis, treatment, and management. This article aims to enhance healthcare professionals' understanding of milk and egg allergies, offering new perspectives and practical guidelines for research and clinical practice to promote accurate diagnosis and personalized treatment strategies.


Subject(s)
Allergens , Egg Hypersensitivity , Food Hypersensitivity , Milk Hypersensitivity , Humans , Allergens/analysis , Egg Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Milk Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Eggs , Animals , Milk
13.
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep ; 24(9): 527-548, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38990406

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: In the last decade, an increasing trend towards a supposedly healthier vegan diet could be observed. However, recently, more cases of allergic reactions to plants and plant-based products such as meat-substitution products, which are often prepared with legumes, were reported. Here, we provide the current knowledge on legume allergen sources and the respective single allergens. We answer the question of which legumes beside the well-known food allergen sources peanut and soybean should be considered for diagnostic and therapeutic measures. RECENT FINDINGS: These "non-priority" legumes, including beans, pea, lentils, chickpea, lupine, cowpea, pigeon pea, and fenugreek, are potentially new important allergen sources, causing mild-to-severe allergic reactions. Severe reactions have been described particularly for peas and lupine. An interesting aspect is the connection between anaphylactic reactions and exercise (food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis), which has only recently been highlighted for legumes such as soybean, lentils and chickpea. Most allergic reactions derive from IgE cross-reactions to homologous proteins, for example between peanut and lupine, which is of particular importance for peanut-allergic individuals ignorant to these cross-reactions. From our findings we conclude that there is a need for large-scale studies that are geographically distinctive because most studies are case reports, and geographic differences of allergic diseases towards these legumes have already been discovered for well-known "Big 9" allergen sources such as peanut and soybean. Furthermore, the review illustrates the need for a better molecular diagnostic for these emerging non-priority allergen sources to evaluate IgE cross-reactivities to known allergens and identify true allergic reactions.


Subject(s)
Allergens , Cicer , Cross Reactions , Fabaceae , Food Hypersensitivity , Lens Plant , Lupinus , Humans , Allergens/immunology , Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Food Hypersensitivity/therapy , Lupinus/immunology , Lupinus/adverse effects , Lens Plant/immunology , Cicer/immunology , Cicer/adverse effects , Cross Reactions/immunology , Fabaceae/immunology , Fabaceae/adverse effects , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Pisum sativum/immunology
14.
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol ; 24(5): 341-348, 2024 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39079158

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Adult food allergy, either unresolved from childhood, or new-onset in adult-life, is known to be increasingly prevalent. Although much of the reported anaphylaxis in adults is due to drug reactions, foods are becoming an increasingly important trigger, affecting adults of all ages, with a wide variation in food triggers which are often quite different to those reported in children. RECENT FINDINGS: Peanuts are well known to cause anaphylaxis in some adult populations, but other legumes such as soy may be more relevant in others. Reactions to natto, fermented soybeans, are currently mainly reported in Japan, but changing dietary practices and an increase in plant-based eating mean natto, other forms of soy and other legumes are increasingly linked to anaphylaxis in Western countries. Anaphylaxis to red meat, caused by sensitization to galactose-α-1,3-galactose and first reported in North America, is now a more world-wide concern. Co-factor induced anaphylaxis is increasingly associated with both wheat allergy and lipid transfer protein allergy. SUMMARY: More research is urgently needed to characterize adult food allergy, its triggers and symptom severity. Unusual food triggers and potential co-factors should be considered, so that anaphylaxis in adults can be correctly managed, not merely labelled as idiopathic.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Food Hypersensitivity , Humans , Anaphylaxis/etiology , Anaphylaxis/epidemiology , Anaphylaxis/immunology , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , Food Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Adult , Allergens/immunology , Allergens/adverse effects , Japan/epidemiology , Wheat Hypersensitivity/immunology , Wheat Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Wheat Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Fabaceae/adverse effects , Fabaceae/immunology , Glycine max/adverse effects , Glycine max/immunology
15.
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep ; 24(9): 549-557, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38976201

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Buckwheat (BW) allergy is a significant issue in Asia. This review delves into three types of BW allergy: immediate food allergy; food-dependent, exercise-induced anaphylaxis (FDEIA) as a subset of immediate food allergy; and food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES); by comparing data from Asian and non-Asian countries. RECENT FINDINGS: Most studies on BW have been published in Japan and Korea, and only a few studies on the topic have been done outside Asia. To date, seven components of common BW (Fagopyrum esculentum) and four components of Tartary BW (Fagopyrum tartaricum) have been implicated in BW allergy. Although BW-sIgE has limited utility for evaluating immediate BW allergy, Fag e 3-specific IgE, one of the components of common BW, and the skin prick test are diagnostically useful. The present review aims to shed light on the current state of knowledge, highlight research gaps, and suggest future directions in the management and understanding of BW allergy.


Subject(s)
Fagopyrum , Food Hypersensitivity , Humans , Fagopyrum/immunology , Fagopyrum/adverse effects , Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Asia/epidemiology , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Anaphylaxis/immunology , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Anaphylaxis/etiology , Anaphylaxis/epidemiology , Allergens/immunology , Skin Tests , Enterocolitis/immunology , Enterocolitis/diagnosis , Enterocolitis/etiology
16.
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep ; 24(9): 497-508, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38976200

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Plant-derived foods are one of the most common causative sources of food allergy in China, with a significant relationship to pollinosis. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of this food-pollen allergy syndrome and its molecular allergen diagnosis to better understand the cross-reactive basis. RECENT FINDINGS: Food-pollen cross-reactivity has been mainly reported in Northern China, Artemisia pollen is the major related inhalant source, followed by tree pollen (Betula), while grass pollen plays a minor role. Pollen allergy is relatively low in Southern China, with allergies to grass pollen being more important than weed and tree pollens. Rosaceae fruits and legume seeds stand out as major related allergenic foods. Non-specific lipid transfer protein (nsLTP) has been found to be the most clinically relevant cross-reacting allergenic component, able to induce severe reactions. PR-10, profilin, defensin, chitinase, and gibberellin-regulated proteins are other important cross-reactive allergen molecules. Artemisia pollen can induce allergenic cross-reactions with a wide range of plant-derived foods in China, and spring tree pollens (Betula) are also important. nsLTP found in both pollen and plant-derived food is considered the most significant allergen in food pollen cross-reactivity. Component-resolved diagnosis with potential allergenic proteins is recommended to improve diagnostic accuracy and predict the potential risk of causing allergic symptoms.


Subject(s)
Allergens , Cross Reactions , Food Hypersensitivity , Pollen , Humans , Cross Reactions/immunology , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , China , Allergens/immunology , Pollen/immunology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/immunology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/diagnosis , Antigens, Plant/immunology , Artemisia/immunology , Plant Proteins/immunology
17.
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep ; 24(9): 519-526, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38980649

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Allergy diagnostics and immunotherapeutics in Asia heavily rely on imported products from Western countries, raising concerns about the accuracy and efficacy of these products for the management of Asian allergy patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent advancements in allergen research have led to the identification and characterization of novel allergens from indigenous Korean species. While some allergens share homology with well-known allergens, others lack counterparts in imported allergen extracts. Classifying regional allergens in Asia into three categories based on their cross-reactivity with imported allergens offers valuable insights. Highly cross-reactive allergens, such as oak allergens Que m 1 from Quercus mongolica and Que ac 1 from Q. acutissima, can be effectively substituted with the imported allergens. Allergens with partial cross-reactivity, like the Asian needle ant allergen Pac c 3 (Antigen 5), permit limited diagnostic value by the currently available products. Unique allergens, including the Japanese hop allergen Hum j 6 (pectin methylesterase inhibitor) and the silkworm pupa allergen Bomb m 4 (30 kDa hemolymph lipoprotein) lack alternatives in the available product list. Greater attention is needed, particularly for species listed as ecologically invasive in Western regions. Additionally, allergens from domestic fruits and vegetables causing pollen food allergy syndrome require characterization for the development of improved diagnostics.


Subject(s)
Allergens , Allergens/immunology , Humans , Republic of Korea , Animals , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Hypersensitivity/therapy , Cross Reactions/immunology , Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Food Hypersensitivity/therapy
18.
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep ; 24(9): 509-518, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38990405

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To provide an update on the diagnosis of non-specific Lipid Transfer Protein (nsLTP) allergy. RECENT FINDINGS: More publications report the presence of nsLTP allergy in Northern European countries and nsLTP sensitisation in children. Individuals are more likely to have severe reactions if there is recognition of increasing numbers of LTP components. Diagnosis is problematic; not all those with nsLTP allergy will have a positive test to a peach extract containing Pru p 3, the peach nsLTP. Sensitisation to nsLTP is being reported in more countries, including to the nsLTP in Cannabis Sativa in North America. Meals containing multiple nsLTP foods are more likely to be involved in co-factor reactions. Component-resolved diagnostics are superior to skin prick tests, to determine sensitisation to the individual nsLTP allergens causing symptoms and, in the future, the Basophil Activation test may best discriminate between sensitization and clinical allergy.


Subject(s)
Antigens, Plant , Carrier Proteins , Food Hypersensitivity , Skin Tests , Humans , Carrier Proteins/immunology , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , Antigens, Plant/immunology , Allergens/immunology , Plant Proteins/immunology , Child , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Immunoglobulin E/blood
19.
Allergy Asthma Proc ; 45(4): e31-e37, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38982605

ABSTRACT

Background: Fruit allergy usually presents with mild-to-moderate symptoms but serious systemic reactions, e.g., anaphylaxis, may also occur. Objective: This study aimed to examine the clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients with fruit allergy and fruit-induced anaphylaxis. Methods: Patients diagnosed with fruit allergy at Diskapi Hematology and Oncology Hospital and Bilkent City Hospital between January 2017 and January 2023 were included in the study. The diagnosis of anaphylaxis was made according to the European Allergy and Clinical Immunology Anaphylaxis Guideline. Results: During the study period, skin-prick tests with food allergens were performed on 9432 patients in our clinic, and fruit allergy was detected in 78 patients (0.82%). Five patients with inaccessible medical records were excluded from the study. 40 (54.8%) were boys. The median (interquartile range) age at the onset of symptoms was 72 months (12.5-144 months). Sixty-eight of the patients (93.2%) had a concomitant allergic disease, the most common of which was allergic rhinitis (n = 48 [65.8%]). The 73 patients had a history of reaction to 126 fruits. Twenty-five patients (19.8%) were allergic to multiple fruits. The most common fruit allergen was banana (22/126 [17.4%]), followed by peach (18/126 [14.2%]) and kiwi (17/126 [13.5%]). Mucocutaneous findings were observed most frequently after fruit consumption (120/126 [95.2%]). Anaphylaxis occurred in 17 patients (23.2%) with 21 fruits.The fruits most commonly associated with anaphylaxis were banana (6/21 [28.6%]) and kiwi (6/21 [28.6%]). Conclusion: Fruit allergy generally presents with mild symptoms, e.g., oral allergy syndrome, but severe systemic symptoms, e.g., anaphylaxis, can also be observed. Kiwi and banana are the fruits that most commonly cause anaphylaxis. Although more comprehensive studies are needed to comment on the development of tolerance, especially in patients with anaphylaxis, responsible fruit avoidance is still the most important strategy.


Subject(s)
Allergens , Anaphylaxis , Food Hypersensitivity , Fruit , Skin Tests , Humans , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Anaphylaxis/etiology , Anaphylaxis/epidemiology , Male , Female , Child , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Food Hypersensitivity/complications , Food Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Fruit/adverse effects , Fruit/immunology , Child, Preschool , Allergens/immunology , Infant , Adolescent
20.
Nutrients ; 16(14)2024 Jul 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39064760

ABSTRACT

Breastfeeding is the most important nutrition source for infants. However, managing breastfed infants with signs and symptoms related to food allergy can be difficult. Many studies have shown the presence of different food allergens in breast milk, but the clinical role of these antigens in human milk is still much debated. Milk is the main suspect in exclusively breastfed infants with signs and symptoms attributable to food allergy, even if other foods may be responsible. This narrative review analyzes the recommendations provided by international guidelines to determine the diagnosis and management of IgE-mediated and non-IgE-mediated food allergies in exclusively breastfed infants. Dietary restrictions in lactating mothers of infants with suspected FA are usually not necessary. Only in the very few cases where significant allergy signs and symptoms occur in the infant during exclusive breastfeeding should the lactating mother follow an elimination diet for the suspected food for a short period.


Subject(s)
Breast Feeding , Food Hypersensitivity , Lactation , Milk, Human , Humans , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Food Hypersensitivity/diet therapy , Infant , Female , Milk, Human/immunology , Diet , Infant, Newborn , Mothers , Elimination Diets
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL