ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In 2019, the shortage of cefazolin led to the demand for cefotiam and cefmetazole exceeding the supply. The Department of Nephro-urology at Nagoya City University Hospital used fosfomycin as a substitute for perioperative prophylaxis. This retrospective preliminary study evaluated the efficacy of fosfomycin and cefotiam for preventing infections following ureterorenoscopy. METHODS: The study included 182 patients who underwent ureterorenoscopy between January 2018 and March 2021). Perioperative antibacterial treatment with fosfomycin (n = 108) or cefotiam (n = 74) was administered. We performed propensity score matching in both groups for age, sex, preoperative urinary catheter use, and preoperative antibiotic treatment. RESULTS: The fosfomycin and cefotiam groups (n = 69 per group) exhibited no significant differences in terms of patients' median age, operative duration, preoperative urine white blood cell count, preoperative urine bacterial count, and the rate of preoperative antibiotic treatment. In the fosfomycin and cefotiam groups, the median duration of postoperative hospital stay was 3 and 4 days, respectively; the median maximum postoperative temperature was 37.3 °C and 37.2 °C, respectively. The fosfomycin group had lower postoperative C-reactive protein levels and white blood cell count than the cefotiam group. However, the frequency of fever > 38 °C requiring additional antibiotic administration was similar. CONCLUSIONS: During cefotiam shortage, fosfomycin administration enabled surgeons to continue performing ureterorenoscopies without increasing the complication rate.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Cephalosporins , Fosfomycin , Ureteroscopy , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Female , Male , Fosfomycin/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Aged , Cephalosporins/therapeutic use , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Adult , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & controlSubject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Ciprofloxacin , Fosfomycin , Prostate , Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination , Humans , Male , Ciprofloxacin/therapeutic use , Ciprofloxacin/administration & dosage , Fosfomycin/therapeutic use , Fosfomycin/administration & dosage , Prostate/pathology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination/therapeutic use , Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination/administration & dosage , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Drug Therapy, Combination , Biopsy/methods , Biopsy/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CPKP) infections seriously threaten global public health. The main objective of this study was to assess the in-vitro synergistic activity of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) in combination with colistin (COL), amikacin (AK), gentamicin (GEN), and fosfomycin (FOS) against CPKP isolates. The secondary goal was to determine the antibiotic susceptibility performance of BD Phoenix. OXA-48 (49.1%) was the predominant carbapenemase, followed by KPC (29.1%). We used the broth microdilution (BMD) method to determine the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of CZA, COL, AK, and GEN. Meanwhile, the MICs of FOS were determined by the agar dilution (AD) method. To examine the antibacterial activity of CZA, we conducted a checkerboard assay (CBA) with COL, AK, GEN, and FOS against CRKP isolates. We randomly selected three strains and performed synergy testing via time-kill assay (TKA). CRKP isolates were 89.1% susceptible to CZA, 16.4% to COL, 21.8% to GEN, and 29.1% to AK using BMD, 47.3% to FOS by AD. The most synergistic effects were observed in the combination of CZA-COL (78.2%) and CZA-FOS (63.6%). Given the limited therapeutic options for treating severe CRKP infections, combining CZA with COL and FOS may enhance in-vitro activity against clinical CRKP isolates.
Subject(s)
Amikacin , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Azabicyclo Compounds , Ceftazidime , Colistin , Drug Combinations , Drug Synergism , Fosfomycin , Gentamicins , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Ceftazidime/pharmacology , Klebsiella pneumoniae/drug effects , Azabicyclo Compounds/pharmacology , Fosfomycin/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Amikacin/pharmacology , Gentamicins/pharmacology , Colistin/pharmacology , Humans , Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae/drug effects , Klebsiella Infections/drug therapy , Klebsiella Infections/microbiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Intravenous fosfomycin (IVFOF) is gaining interest in severe infections. Its use may be limited by adverse events (AEs). Little experience exists on IVFOF therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in real-life setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of patients receiving IVFOF for > 48 h at Policlinico Hospital (Milan, Italy) from 01/01/2019 to 01/01/2023. AEs associated to IVFOF graded CTCAE ≥ II were considered. Demographic and clinical risk factors for IVFOF-related AEs were analysed with simple and multivariable regression models. The determination of IVFOF TDM was made by a rapid ultraperformance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry method (LC-MS/MS) on plasma samples. The performance of TDM (trough levels (Cmin) in intermittent infusion, steady state levels (Css) in continuous infusion) in predicting AEs ≤ 5 days after its assessment was evaluated. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-four patients were included. At IVFOF initiation, 81/224 (36.2%) patients were in ICU and 35/224 (15.7%) had septic shock. The most frequent infection site was the low respiratory tract (124/224, 55.4%). Ninety-five patients (42.4%) experienced ≥ 1AEs, with median time of 4.0 (2.0-7.0) days from IVFOF initiation. Hypernatremia was the most frequent AE (53/224, 23.7%). Therapy discontinuation due to AEs occurred in 38/224 (17.0%). ICU setting, low respiratory tract infections and septic shock resulted associated with AEs (RRadjusted 1.59 (95%CI:1.09-2.31), 1.46 (95%CI:1.03-2.07) and 1.73 (95%CI:1.27-2.37), respectively), while IVFOF daily dose did not. Of the 68 patients undergone IVFOF TDM, TDM values predicted overall AEs and hypernatremia with AUROC of 0.65 (95%CI:0.44-0.86) and 0.91 (95%CI:0.79-1.0) respectively for Cmin, 0.67 (95%CI:0.39-0.95) and 0.76 (95%CI:0.52-1.0) respectively for Css. CONCLUSIONS: We provided real world data on the use of IVFOF-based regimens and associated AEs. IVFOF TDM deserves further research as it may represent a valid tool to predict AEs. KEY POINTS: Real world data on intravenous fosfomycin for severe bacterial infections. AEs occurred in over 40% (therapy discontinuation in 17%) and were related to baseline clinical severity but not to fosfomycin dose. TDM showed promising results in predicting AEs.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Drug Monitoring , Fosfomycin , Humans , Fosfomycin/adverse effects , Fosfomycin/administration & dosage , Fosfomycin/therapeutic use , Female , Male , Retrospective Studies , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Aged , Administration, Intravenous , Italy , Adult , Tandem Mass SpectrometryABSTRACT
Despite the first-line recommendation of fosfomycin for uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs), there are pressing barriers for optimizing its use for the treatment of non-Escherichia coli Enterobacterales UTI. There are no approved breakpoints for oral use against other Enterobacterales, and the recommended agar dilution (AD) reference method for minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination is largely impractical. Using 160 clinical Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates, we sought to understand rates of skipped wells and MIC imprecision in broth microdilution (BMD) and how that compares to rates of error using AD. Though the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute refers to the skipped well phenomena in their recommendation against the use of BMD, there is a paucity of data on its frequency. While AD and BMD produced similar MIC50/90 values (32/256 µg/mL for AD and 64/256 µg/mL for BMD), essential agreement was poor. No-growth wells at concentrations below the MIC occurred in up to 10.9% of wells at a given concentration, as the most frequent scientific error. Growth in concentrations above the measured MIC occurred in up to 3.3% of wells and was seen within three dilutions of the MIC for BMD. Observation of single colonies either at or beyond the measured MIC for AD was also common and occurred up to 8.3% and 2.5% of the time, respectively. The frequent scientific error in both testing methods should prompt re-evaluation of AD guidelines and expansion of MIC testing methods for fosfomycin susceptibility testing, as poor agreement with another method prone to scientific error should not be the main detractor from BMD use.IMPORTANCEDespite the recommendation of fosfomycin for uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs), there are barriers for optimizing its use. There are no approved breakpoints for oral use against other Enterobacterales, and the recommended agar dilution (AD) reference method for MIC determination is largely impractical. The use of broth microdilution (BMD) for fosfomycin testing is not recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute due to unsatisfactory precision and skipped wells-occurrence of no-growth in a single well before the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC)-and trailing endpoints. We sought to understand rates of skipped wells and growth at concentrations above measured MICs in BMD and how that compares to scientific error using AD. No-growth wells at concentrations below the MIC occurred in up to 10.9% of wells for BMD and single colonies at or beyond measured MICs for AD were also common. Frequent scientific error in both methods should prompt re-evaluation of both AD and BMD for fosfomycin susceptibility testing.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Fosfomycin , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Fosfomycin/pharmacology , Klebsiella pneumoniae/drug effects , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/methods , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Humans , Urinary Tract Infections/microbiology , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy , Klebsiella Infections/drug therapy , Klebsiella Infections/microbiology , Agar , Culture Media/chemistryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The role of intravenous fosfomycin (iv-FOS) as a part of combination therapy for Gram-negative bacteria bloodstream infections (GNB-BSI) needs to be evaluated in clinical practice, as in vitro data show potential efficacy. METHODS: All consecutive patients with a GNB-BSI from 01 January 2021 to 01 April 2023 were included. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. A Cox regression analysis was used to identify predictors of mortality; an inverse-probability of treatment-weighting (IPTW) analysis was also performed. RESULTS: Overall, 363 patients were enrolled: 211 (58%) males, with a median (q1-q3) age of 68 (57-78) years, and a median Charlson comorbidity index of 5 (3-7). At GNB-BSI onset, the median SOFA score was 5 (2-7) and 122 patients (34%) presented with septic shock. Pathogens were principally Klebsiella pneumoniae (42%), Escherichia coli (28%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17%); of them, 36% were carbapenem-resistant. The therapy included carbapenems (40%), cephalosporins (37%) and beta-lactams/beta-lactamases-inhibitors (19%); a combination with iv-FOS was used in 98 (27%) cases at a median dosage of 16 (16-18) g/daily. The use of iv-FOS was not associated with reduced crude mortality (21% vs 29%, P = 0.147). However, on multivariable Cox-regression, combination therapy with iv-FOS resulted in protection for mortality (aHR 0.51, 95% CI 0.28-0.92), but not other combo-therapies (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.44-1.16). This result was also confirmed with the IPTW-adjusted Cox model (aHR 0.52, 95% CI 0.31-0.91). Subgroup analysis suggested a benefit in severe infections (SOFA > 6, PITT ≥ 4) and when iv-FOS was initiated within 24 hours of GNB-BSI onset. CONCLUSIONS: Fosfomycin in combination therapy for GNB-BSI may have a role in improving survival. These results justify the development of further clinical trials.
Subject(s)
Administration, Intravenous , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Bacteremia , Fosfomycin , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections , Propensity Score , Humans , Fosfomycin/therapeutic use , Fosfomycin/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Female , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/mortality , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Bacteremia/microbiology , Bacteremia/mortality , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Drug Therapy, CombinationABSTRACT
Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) are a major cause of neonatal sepsis in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Although the World Health Organization (WHO) reports that over 80% of these sepsis deaths could be prevented through improved treatment, the efficacy of the currently recommended first- and second-line treatment regimens for this condition is increasingly affected by high rates of drug resistance. Here we assess three well known antibiotics, fosfomycin, flomoxef and amikacin, in combination as potential antibiotic treatment regimens by investigating the drug resistance and genetic profiles of commonly isolated GNB causing neonatal sepsis in LMICs. The five most prevalent bacterial isolates in the NeoOBS study (NCT03721302) are Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, E. coli, Serratia marcescens and Enterobacter cloacae complex. Among these isolates, high levels of ESBL and carbapenemase encoding genes are detected along with resistance to ampicillin, gentamicin and cefotaxime, the current WHO recommended empiric regimens. The three new combinations show excellent in vitro activity against ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae and E. coli isolates. Our data should further inform and support the clinical evaluation of these three antibiotic combinations for the treatment of neonatal sepsis in areas with high rates of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria.
Subject(s)
Acinetobacter baumannii , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Gram-Negative Bacteria , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Neonatal Sepsis , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Neonatal Sepsis/microbiology , Neonatal Sepsis/drug therapy , Infant, Newborn , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Gram-Negative Bacteria/genetics , Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Acinetobacter baumannii/drug effects , Acinetobacter baumannii/isolation & purification , Acinetobacter baumannii/genetics , Klebsiella pneumoniae/drug effects , Klebsiella pneumoniae/isolation & purification , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genetics , Amikacin/pharmacology , Amikacin/therapeutic use , Fosfomycin/pharmacology , Fosfomycin/therapeutic use , beta-Lactamases/genetics , beta-Lactamases/metabolism , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Escherichia coli/genetics , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Developing Countries , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/genetics , Drug Therapy, Combination , Serratia marcescens/drug effects , Serratia marcescens/genetics , Serratia marcescens/isolation & purification , Enterobacter cloacae/drug effects , Enterobacter cloacae/genetics , Enterobacter cloacae/isolation & purification , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Bacterial Proteins/metabolismABSTRACT
Fosfomycin-resistant FosA8-producing Enterobacterales are uncommon strains with extremely low incidence in Europe, based on only three reports in the literature. We detected FosA8-producing Escherichia coli ST131 in clinical isolates from two patients admitted in February 2023 to a rehabilitation unit in Italy. The occurrence of rare fosA-like genes in the high-risk clone ST131 is of clinical relevance. The dissemination of FosA-producing E. coli, although still at low levels, should be continuously monitored.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Escherichia coli Infections , Escherichia coli , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Escherichia coli/genetics , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Escherichia coli Infections/microbiology , Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Fosfomycin/pharmacology , Fosfomycin/therapeutic use , Male , beta-Lactamases/genetics , beta-Lactamases/metabolism , Female , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Multilocus Sequence TypingABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To evaluate antibiotic prophylaxis in transrectal prostate biopsies due to the recommendation of the European Medicines Agency (EMA): We describe our single center experience switching from ciprofloxacin to fosfomycin trometamol (FMT) alone and to an augmented prophylaxis combining fosfomycin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX). METHODS: Between 01/2019 and 12/2020 we compared three different regimes. The primary endpoint was the clinical diagnosis of an infection within 4 weeks after biopsy. We enrolled 822 men, 398 (48%) of whom received ciprofloxacin (group-C), 136 (16.5%) received FMT (group-F) and 288 (35%) received the combination of TMP/SMX and FMT (group-BF). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. In total 37/398 (5%) postinterventional infections were detected, of which 13/398 (3%) vs 18/136 (13.2%) vs 6/288 (2.1%) were detected in group-C, group-F and group-BF respectively. The relative risk of infectious complication was 1.3 (CI 0.7-2.6) for group-C vs. group-BF and 2.8 (CI 1.4-5.7) for group-F vs. group-BF respectively. CONCLUSION: The replacement of ciprofloxacin by fosfomycin alone resulted in a significant increase of postinterventional infections, while the combination of FMT and TMP/SMX had a comparable infection rate to FQ without apparent adverse events. Therefore, this combined regimen of FMT and TMP/SMX is recommended.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Ciprofloxacin , Drug Therapy, Combination , Fosfomycin , Prostate , Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination , Humans , Male , Fosfomycin/therapeutic use , Fosfomycin/administration & dosage , Ciprofloxacin/therapeutic use , Ciprofloxacin/administration & dosage , Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination/therapeutic use , Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination/administration & dosage , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Aged , Middle Aged , Prostate/pathology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Biopsy/methods , Biopsy/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Rectum , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/epidemiologyABSTRACT
This study aimed to assess the in vitro efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) in combination with various antimicrobial agents against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP). We selected 59 clinical CRKP isolates containing distinct drug resistance mechanisms. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of meropenem (MEM), colistin (COL), eravacycline (ERA), amikacin (AK), fosfomycin (FOS), and aztreonam (ATM), both individually and in combination with CZA, were tested using the checkerboard method. The interactions of antimicrobial agent combinations were assessed by fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) and susceptible breakpoint index (SBPI). The time-kill curve assay was employed to dynamically evaluate the effects of these drugs alone and in combination format. In the checkerboard assay, the combination of CZA+MEM showed the highest level of synergistic effect against both KPC-producing and carbapenemase-non-producing isolates, with synergy rates of 91.3% and 100%, respectively. Following closely was the combination of FOS+CZA . For metallo-beta-lactamases (MBLs) producing strains, ATM+CZA displayed complete synergy, while the combination of MEM+CZA showed a synergy rate of only 57.14% for NDM-producing strains and 91.67% for IMP-producing strains. In the time-kill assay, MEM+CZA also demonstrated significant synergistic effects against the two KPC-2-producing isolates (Y070 and L70), the two carbapenemase-non-producing isolates (Y083 and L093), and the NDM-1-producing strain L13, with reductions in log10 CFU/mL exceeding 10 compared to the control. Against the IMP-producing strain Y047, ATM+CZA exhibited the highest synergistic effect, resulting in a log10 CFU/mL reduction of 10.43 compared to the control. The combination of CZA and MEM exhibited good synergistic effects against KPC-producing and non-enzyme-producing strains, followed by the FOS+CZA combination. Among MBL-producing strains, ATM+CZA demonstrated the most pronounced synergistic effect. However, the combinations of CZA with ERA, AK, and COL show irrelevant effects against the tested clinical isolates. IMPORTANCE: Our study confirmed the efficacy of the combination CZA+MEM against KPC-producing and non-carbapenemase-producing strains. For metalloenzyme-producing strains, CZA+ATM demonstrated the most significant synergy. Additionally, CZA exhibited a notable synergy effect when combined with FOS. These combination therapies present promising new options for the treatment of CRKP infection.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Azabicyclo Compounds , Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae , Ceftazidime , Drug Combinations , Drug Synergism , Klebsiella Infections , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Azabicyclo Compounds/pharmacology , Klebsiella pneumoniae/drug effects , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genetics , Ceftazidime/pharmacology , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Klebsiella Infections/drug therapy , Klebsiella Infections/microbiology , Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae/drug effects , beta-Lactamases/metabolism , beta-Lactamases/genetics , Carbapenems/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Bacterial Proteins/metabolism , Fosfomycin/pharmacology , Aztreonam/pharmacologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Severe infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) have been reported increasingly over the past few years. Many in-vivo and in-vitro studies have suggested a possible role of intravenous fosfomycin for the treatment of CRAB infections. METHODS: This multi-centre, retrospective study included patients treated with intravenous fosfomycin for severe infections caused by CRAB admitted consecutively to four hospitals in Italy from December 2017 to December 2022. The primary goal of the study was to evaluate the risk factors associated with 30-day mortality in the study population. A propensity score matched analysis was added to the model. RESULTS: One hundred and two patients with severe infections caused by CRAB treated with an intravenous fosfomycin-containing regimen were enrolled in this study. Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) was diagnosed in 59% of patients, primary bacteraemia in 22% of patients, and central-venous-catheter-related infection in 16% of patients. All patients were treated with a regimen containing intravenous fosfomycin, mainly in combination with cefiderocol (n=54), colistin (n=48) or ampicillin/sulbactam (n=18). Forty-eight (47%) patients died within 30 days. Fifty-eight (57%) patients experienced clinical therapeutic failure. Cox regression analysis showed that diabetes, primary bacteraemia and a colistin-containing regimen were independently associated with 30-day mortality, whereas adequate source control of infection, early 24-h active in-vitro therapy, and a cefiderocol-containing regimen were associated with survival. A colistin-based regimen, A. baumannii colonization and primary bacteraemia were independently associated with clinical failure. Conversely, adequate source control of infection, a cefiderocol-containing regimen, and early 24-h active in-vitro therapy were associated with clinical success. CONCLUSIONS: Different antibiotic regimens containing fosfomycin in combination can be used for treatment of severe infections caused by CRAB.
Subject(s)
Acinetobacter Infections , Acinetobacter baumannii , Administration, Intravenous , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Carbapenems , Fosfomycin , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Sulbactam , Humans , Fosfomycin/therapeutic use , Fosfomycin/administration & dosage , Acinetobacter baumannii/drug effects , Acinetobacter Infections/drug therapy , Acinetobacter Infections/mortality , Acinetobacter Infections/microbiology , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Aged , Middle Aged , Carbapenems/therapeutic use , Sulbactam/therapeutic use , Sulbactam/administration & dosage , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/microbiology , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/mortality , Colistin/therapeutic use , Colistin/administration & dosage , Italy , Ampicillin/therapeutic use , Ampicillin/administration & dosage , Cefiderocol , Aged, 80 and over , Drug Therapy, Combination , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Bacteremia/microbiology , Bacteremia/mortality , Drug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialSubject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Fosfomycin , Genome, Bacterial , Klebsiella Infections , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Klebsiella pneumoniae/drug effects , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genetics , Fosfomycin/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Humans , Drug Resistance, Bacterial/genetics , Klebsiella Infections/microbiology , Klebsiella Infections/drug therapyABSTRACT
Escherichia coli O157:H7 is a globally important foodborne pathogen with implications for food safety. Antibiotic treatment for O157 may potentially contribute to the exacerbation of hemolytic uremic syndrome, and the increasing prevalence of antibiotic-resistant strains necessitates the development of new treatment strategies. In this study, the bactericidal effects and resistance development of antibiotic and bacteriophage monotherapy were compared with those of combination therapy against O157. Experiments involving continuous exposure of O157 to phages and antibiotics, along with genetic deletion studies, revealed that the deletion of glpT and uhpT significantly increased resistance to fosfomycin. Furthermore, we found that OmpC functions as a receptor for the PP01 phage, which infects O157, and FhuA functions as a receptor for the newly isolated SP15 phage, targeting O157. In the glpT and uhpT deletion mutants, additional deletion in ompC, the receptor for the PP01 phage, increased resistance to fosfomycin. These findings suggest that specific phages may contribute to antibiotic resistance by selecting the emergence of gene mutations responsible for both phage and antibiotic resistance. While combination therapy with phages and antibiotics holds promise for the treatment of bacterial infections, careful consideration of phage selection is necessary.IMPORTANCEThe combination treatment of fosfomycin and bacteriophages against Escherichia coli O157 demonstrated superior bactericidal efficacy compared to monotherapy, effectively suppressing the emergence of resistance. However, mutations selected by phage PP01 led to enhanced resistance not only to the phage but also to fosfomycin. These findings underscore the importance of exercising caution in selecting phages for combination therapy, as resistance selected by specific phages may increase the risk of developing antibiotic resistance.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Escherichia coli Infections , Escherichia coli O157 , Fosfomycin , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Escherichia coli O157/virology , Escherichia coli O157/drug effects , Escherichia coli O157/genetics , Escherichia coli Infections/microbiology , Escherichia coli Infections/drug therapy , Humans , Fosfomycin/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Bacteriophages/genetics , Bacteriophages/physiology , Bacteriophages/drug effects , Phage Therapy/methods , Coliphages/genetics , Coliphages/drug effects , Coliphages/physiology , Escherichia coli Proteins/genetics , Escherichia coli Proteins/metabolismABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Fosfomycin has been used more frequently in managing uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) due to decreased compliance and increased multidrug-resistant bacteria. The aim of this network meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy of Fosfomycin compared to Nitrofurantoin, Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), and Ciprofloxacin in terms of clinical and microbiological cure alongside with other measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). We included randomized control trials (RCTs) with uncomplicated UTI patients who received Fosfomycin, Nitrofurantoin, TMP-SMX, or Ciprofloxacin and reported the clinical or microbiological cure. We used Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool to assess the included studies' quality. R-software was used for all statistical analysis. We ranked all antibiotics using the netrank function which yielded P scores. Frequentist network meta-analysis was used to assess the efficacy of all outcomes. RESULTS: We included 13 RCTs with a total number of 3856 patients that showed Fosfomycin ranked the highest among the other antibiotics with respect to clinical cure (P-score = 0.99) and microbiological cure (P-score = 0.99) while Ciprofloxacin ranked the lowest (P-score = 0.11 and 0.02, respectively). Moreover, Ciprofloxacin yielded the highest relapse rate (P-score = 1), whereas TMP-SMX had the lowest relapse rate (P-score = 0.07). As for the adverse events, Ciprofloxacin demonstrated the highest adverse events as opposed to Fosfomycin (P-score = 0.98 and 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSION: The network meta-analysis demonstrated that Fosfomycin is the most effective antibiotic in treating uncomplicated UTIs with respect to clinical cure, microbiological cure, and adverse events profile.
Subject(s)
Fosfomycin , Urinary Tract Infections , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Fosfomycin/therapeutic use , Nitrofurantoin , Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination , Network Meta-Analysis , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy , Ciprofloxacin/therapeutic use , RecurrenceABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common bacterial complication in pregnancy. The study aimed to estimate the prevalence, risk factors, and bacterial etiology of UTI during pregnancy and determine the efficacy of antimicrobial drugs in treating UTIs. METHODOLOGY: Urine specimens and clinical data were collected from pregnant women who attended primary health centers in Erbil, Iraq. All specimens were cultured on appropriate media and identified by standard microbiological methods. The pregnant women were grouped into symptomatic UTI group, asymptomatic bacteriuria group, and the control group. The agar dilution method was used to determine antimicrobial susceptibility. RESULTS: Among the 5,042 pregnant women included in this study, significant bacteriuria was found in 625 (12.40%) of the cases, and 198 (31.68%) had symptomatic UTI, of which 43.59% were diagnosed during the third trimester. Out of the 643 bacteria isolated, 33.28% were symptomatic UTI, of which 43.59% developed during the third trimester. There was a significant difference in the bacterial etiology between symptomatic UTI and asymptomatic bacteriuria (p = 0.002), as well as between cystitis and pyelonephritis (p = 0.017). The most common bacterial species isolated was Escherichia coli, which was susceptible to fosfomycin (100%), meropenem (99.45%), and nitrofurantoin (97.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant women are more likely to develop UTI in the third trimester. Escherichia coli is the predominant pathogen. The study suggests the use of fosfomycin, meropenem, and nitrofurantoin for the treatment of UTI. No Gram-positive isolates were resistant to daptomycin.
Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents , Bacteriuria , Fosfomycin , Urinary Tract Infections , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Bacteriuria/drug therapy , Bacteriuria/epidemiology , Bacteriuria/microbiology , Nitrofurantoin/pharmacology , Nitrofurantoin/therapeutic use , Fosfomycin/therapeutic use , Pregnant Women , Meropenem/therapeutic use , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology , Urinary Tract Infections/etiology , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Escherichia coli , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic useABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to investigate the detection of teicoplanin and fosfomycin antibiotic susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains by different methods and to evaluate the antibacterial synergistic effect of teicoplanin-fosfomycin combination by using checkerboard assay and time kill curve assay. Forty-five MRSA strains isolated from clinical samples in routine medical microbiology laboratory of Göztepe Prof. Dr. Süleyman Yalçin City Hospital were included in the study. In the first stage of the combination study, minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were investigated by broth microdilution for teicoplanin and by both broth microdilution and agar dilution methods for fosfomycin. The combination of teicoplanin and fosfomycin was tested by the checkerboard method in 45 MRSA strains and combination effect was determined according to fractional inhibitory concentration index (ΣFIC) calculation. The synergistic effect and bactericidal activity of antibiotic combination were studied against a randomly selected strain from the strains used in the study by using time-kill method for 24 hours. As a result of teicoplanin and fosfomycin antibiotic susceptibility studies, all isolates were found to be susceptible to both antibiotics according to the susceptibility breakpoints determined by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). A synergistic effect was found in 22 (49%), additive effect in 22 (49%) and indifferent effect in one (2%) of the 45 strains studied with the checkerboard method. The mean ΣFIC of 45 isolates was found to be 0.5. In the combination study of the antibiotics of the isolate that was studied with time-kill method, synergism was detected for 1/8 MIC concentrations at 12th hour and 24th hour and synergism at 1/4 MIC concentration at sixth hour, 12th hour and 24th hour. In the combination study of 1/4 MIC concentrations of antibiotics, bactericidal effect was detected at sixth hour and this effect was observed to disappear at 12th and 24th hours. High rate of synergistic antibacterial effect of teicoplanin-fosfomycin combination on MRSA isolates was demonstrated as a result of in vitro tests. Such studies conducted on antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections will provide clinicians different treatment options and will contribute to increasing survival. As a result of this study, provided that it is supported by future clinical studies, it can be stated that the teicoplanin-fosfomycin combination may be an effective treatment option in community and hospital-acquired infections caused by MRSA.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Drug Synergism , Fosfomycin , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Staphylococcal Infections , Teicoplanin , Fosfomycin/pharmacology , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Teicoplanin/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Humans , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiologyABSTRACT
AIM: To evaluate the effect of antibacterial prophylaxis using oral fosfomycin during the removal of a urethral catheter after radical prostatectomy on the development of urinary tract infection, severity of leukocyturia and bacteriuria, as well as the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center, non-blind, prospective, randomized controlled trial was carried out. The main group included 40 patients, and the control group included 37 patients. In the group 1, patients received two doses of oral fosfomycin, 3 g, namely in the evening on the day of catheter removal (the first dose) and 48 hours after catheter removal (the second dose). In the group 2, patients did not receive any antibacterial prophylaxis after urethral catheter removal. The endpoints of the study were confirmed episodes of urinary tract infection within 1 month after removal of the urethral catheter, leukocyturia and bacteriuria in urinalysis/urine culture) and severity of the lower urinary tract symptoms assessed by IPSS questionnaire. RESULTS: In the group 2, urinary tract infection was noted in 17.1%, while in the group 2 only in 2.6% of patients (p=0.032). Leukocyturia and bacteriuria were significantly less common in the group receiving antibacterial prophylaxis with fosfomycin (18.4% vs. 48.6%, respectively; p=0.006). Positive urine culture was observed in 7.9% vs. 25.7%, respectively (p=0.035). Four weeks after removal of the urethral catheter, the average IPSS score was significantly higher in the group 2 (13.2 vs. 9.5 points; p=0.002). There were no cases of allergic reaction and pseudomembranous colitis associated with C. difficile in both groups. Diarrhea cured with sorbents was noted in 2 patients (5.2%) in fosfomycin group. CONCLUSION: Antibacterial prophylaxis using two oral doses of fosfomycin 3 g on the day of urethral catheter removal and 48 hours after catheter removal after radical prostatectomy appears to be an effective scheme that reduces the incidence of urinary tract infection and the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms, and is characterized by a minimal risk of adverse events. It is necessary to carried out further research and develop clear recommendations for antibacterial prevention in urological interventions requiring prolonged urethral catheterization.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Fosfomycin , Prostatectomy , Urinary Catheters , Urinary Tract Infections , Humans , Fosfomycin/administration & dosage , Fosfomycin/therapeutic use , Male , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Prostatectomy/methods , Middle Aged , Urinary Tract Infections/prevention & control , Aged , Prospective Studies , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Urinary Catheters/adverse effects , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Device RemovalSubject(s)
Abscess , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Escherichia coli Infections , Escherichia coli , Fosfomycin , beta-Lactamases , Humans , Fosfomycin/therapeutic use , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Escherichia coli/genetics , Escherichia coli/enzymology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Escherichia coli Infections/drug therapy , Escherichia coli Infections/microbiology , beta-Lactamases/genetics , beta-Lactamases/metabolism , Male , Abscess/drug therapy , Abscess/microbiology , Treatment Outcome , Prostatic Diseases/drug therapy , Prostatic Diseases/microbiology , AgedABSTRACT
Reverse analogs of the phosphonohydroxamic acid antibiotic fosmidomycin are potent inhibitors of the nonmevalonate isoprenoid biosynthesis enzyme 1-deoxy-d-xylulose 5-phosphate reductoisomerase (DXR, IspC) of Plasmodium falciparum. Some novel analogs with large phenylalkyl substituents at the hydroxamic acid nitrogen exhibit nanomolar PfDXR inhibition and potent in vitro growth inhibition of P. falciparum parasites coupled with good parasite selectivity. X-ray crystallographic studies demonstrated that the N-phenylpropyl substituent of the newly developed lead compound 13e is accommodated in a subpocket within the DXR catalytic domain but does not reach the NADPH binding pocket of the N-terminal domain. As shown for reverse carba and thia analogs, PfDXR selectively binds the S-enantiomer of the new lead compound. In addition, some representatives of the novel inhibitor subclass are nanomolar Escherichia coli DXR inhibitors, whereas the inhibition of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DXR is considerably weaker.
Subject(s)
Aldose-Ketose Isomerases , Antimalarials , Fosfomycin , Hydroxamic Acids , Multienzyme Complexes , Plasmodium falciparum , Fosfomycin/pharmacology , Fosfomycin/analogs & derivatives , Fosfomycin/chemistry , Aldose-Ketose Isomerases/antagonists & inhibitors , Aldose-Ketose Isomerases/metabolism , Aldose-Ketose Isomerases/chemistry , Plasmodium falciparum/drug effects , Plasmodium falciparum/enzymology , Hydroxamic Acids/pharmacology , Hydroxamic Acids/chemistry , Antimalarials/pharmacology , Antimalarials/chemistry , Multienzyme Complexes/antagonists & inhibitors , Multienzyme Complexes/metabolism , Multienzyme Complexes/chemistry , Crystallography, X-Ray , Enzyme Inhibitors/pharmacology , Enzyme Inhibitors/chemistry , Enzyme Inhibitors/chemical synthesis , Structure-Activity Relationship , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Escherichia coli/genetics , Escherichia coli/enzymology , Models, Molecular , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/drug effects , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/enzymology , Catalytic Domain , Oxidoreductases/antagonists & inhibitors , Oxidoreductases/metabolismABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: IV fosfomycin is used against MDR Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) but has dose-limiting side effects, especially in patients with impaired kidney function. OBJECTIVES: To determine the optimal dosage of IV fosfomycin for patients with varying degrees of kidney function. METHODS: Adult patients receiving IV fosfomycin for treatment of GNB were eligible. Five serial blood samples were collected after at least three doses of fosfomycin; plasma was assayed by LC-MS/MS and modelled by population pharmacokinetic analysis. The PTA for AUC24/MIC of 98.9 for Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, and 40.8 for Pseudomonas aeruginosa were computed by Monte Carlo simulations. Cumulative fractions of response (CFR) were analysed for each pathogen using EUCAST MIC distributions. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients were included. Creatinine clearance (CLCR) and gender significantly influenced fosfomycin clearance. The kidney function-adjusted dosing regimens are proposed by using the lowest dose that can achieve ≥90% PTA for AUC24/MIC of 98.9 at an MIC of ≤32 mg/L (EUCAST v.13 susceptibility breakpoint for Enterobacterales). For patients with normal kidney function (CLCR 91-120 mL/min), a dosage of 15 g/day is suggested. This regimen achieved 97.1% CFR against E. coli, whereas CFR was 72.9% for K. pneumoniae and 76.7% for P. aeruginosa. CONCLUSIONS: A fosfomycin dosage of 15 g/day with adjustment according to kidney function provided high PTA and CFR when treating E. coli. This dosage is lower than that used in current practice and may improve tolerability. Higher dosages may be needed for P. aeruginosa; however, safety data are limited.