Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 3.745
Filter
1.
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr ; 33(3): 447-456, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38965732

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Frailty has become a public health challenge in China. To investigate the association of foods consumption and physical activity with prefrailty and frailty among older Chinese adults in urban communities. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: In a cross-sectional study from February to July 2023, 1183 older adults aged between 65y-88y were enrolled from urban communities in Chongqing and Shandong province, China. Frailty Index (FI) was applied to measure prefrailty and frailty. Partial proportional odds model was used to assess the association between foods consumption, physical activity and prefrailty/frailty. RESULTS: Higher Dietary Diversity Score (DDS), (OR=0.61, 95% CI=0.46-0.80; OR=0.47, 95% CI=0.28-0.79), Consuming animal-based foods ≥2 times/day (OR=0.62, 95% CI=0.47-0.82; OR=0.54, 95% CI=0.33-0.88), soy products ≥2 times/week (OR=0.69, 95% CI=0.53-0.89; OR=0.51, 95% CI=0.31-0.84), fresh vegetables ≥2 times/day (OR=0.42, 95% CI=0.31-0.57; OR=0.41, 95% CI=0.23-0.72), and nuts ≥2 times/week (OR=0.71, 95% CI=0.55-0.91; OR=0.52, 95% CI=0.32-0.85) was associated with a lower risk of prefrailty and frailty. In addition, higher frequency and longer duration of walking (OR=0.61, 95% CI=0.42-0.88; OR=0.63, 95% CI=0.48-0.81), exercise (OR=0.48, 95% CI=0.35-0.64; OR=0.44, 95% CI=0.32-0.61) per week were significantly associated with lower risk of prefrailty. Furthermore, higher frequency and longer duration of walking (OR=0.42, 95% CI=0.25-0.72; OR=0.46, 95% CI=0.29-0.74), and housework (OR=0.39, 95% CI=0.24-0.65; OR=0.57, 95% CI=0.34-0.96) per week, were significantly associated with lower frailty. CONCLUSIONS: Higher DDS and higher frequency of animal-based foods, soy products, fresh vegetables, and nuts consumption is significantly associated with lower risk of prefrailty and frailty. Additionally, walking and exercising are significantly associated with lower risk of prefrailty, while walking and doing housework is significantly associated with lower frailty.


Subject(s)
Diet , Exercise , Frailty , Urban Population , Humans , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Male , Female , China/epidemiology , Frailty/epidemiology , Aged, 80 and over , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data , Diet/statistics & numerical data , Diet/methods , Frail Elderly/statistics & numerical data , East Asian People
2.
BMC Geriatr ; 24(1): 574, 2024 Jul 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38961322

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Research suggests that frailty is associated with lower physical activity and well-being in old age, but social activities at work may facilitate physical activity and its positive effect on well-being among older employees with frailty. This study, therefore, ascertained whether there is a moderated mediation of the association of frailty, Workplace Social Activity (WSA), and well-being by Physical Activity (PA). METHODS: The study adopted a cross-sectional design with relevant sensitivity analyses for confounding. The participants were within two Ghanaian samples with different income levels (low-income, n = 897, and higher income, n = 530). The minimum samples were calculated, and the statistical models were tested with Haye's Process Model through structural equation modelling. RESULTS: Frailty was negatively associated with PA, and this relationship was moderated by WSA in both samples. Higher frailty was directly and indirectly associated with lower well-being in the higher-income sample but only indirectly associated with lower well-being in the low-income sample. The mediation of PA in the frailty-well-being relationship is partial in the higher-income sample but complete in the low-income sample. There was evidence of moderated mediation in both samples. CONCLUSION: WSA may reduce the strength of the negative association of frailty with PA and well-being among older employees in both samples. Workplace interventions aimed at enhancing WSA may encourage PA and enhance well-being among older employees with frailty.


Subject(s)
Exercise , Frailty , Workplace , Humans , Male , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Frailty/psychology , Frailty/epidemiology , Workplace/psychology , Exercise/physiology , Exercise/psychology , Middle Aged , Aged , Ghana/epidemiology , Income , Mediation Analysis
3.
BMC Geriatr ; 24(1): 576, 2024 Jul 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38961352

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Frailty is a prevalent geriatric condition that significantly impacts the health of older adults. This study aimed to examine the prevalence of frailty among older Chinese adults aged ≥ 65 years and to assess its association with adverse geriatric outcomes. METHOD: This study included 20,724 older adults aged ≥ 65 years in Jiangsu Province, China, utilizing a random, stratified, multistage cluster sampling approach. Frailty was assessed using the 5-item FRAIL scale. Geriatric outcomes, such as independence in activities of daily living (ADL), cognitive impairment, and frequent fall events (occurring four or more times in the preceding year), were evaluated. Logistic regression models were employed to evaluate the association between frailty and geriatric outcomes, with results presented as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: The mean age of the participants was 73.4 ± 6.4 years. The standardized prevalence of prefrailty and frailty was 35.2% and 10.3%, respectively. Individuals identified as prefrail or frail tended to live in rural areas, have lower educational levels, be widowed, have lower incomes, and engage in less physical activity. Prefrailty and frailty were associated with an increased risk of limitations in BADL (OR: 9.62, 95% CI: 7.43-12.46; and OR: 29.25, 95% CI: 22.42-38.17, respectively) and IADL (OR: 2.54, 95% CI 2.35-2.74; and OR: 5.19, 95% CI 4.66-5.78, respectively), positive cognitive impairment screening (OR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.16-1.31; and OR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.56-1.91, respectively), and frequent falls (occurring four or more times in the preceding year) (OR: 3.38, 95% CI: 2.50-4.56; and OR: 8.37, 95% CI: 6.01-11.65). The association between frailty and both limitations in BADL and falls was notably more pronounced among the younger age groups (p for interaction < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: According to the 5-item FRAIL scale, frailty was associated with limitations in BADLs and IADLs, positive cognitive impairment screening, and recent falls among older adults living in the community. Screening for frailty in younger age groups has the potential to prevent declines in physical function and falls.


Subject(s)
Accidental Falls , Activities of Daily Living , Cognitive Dysfunction , Frail Elderly , Frailty , Geriatric Assessment , Independent Living , Humans , Aged , Male , Female , China/epidemiology , Accidental Falls/prevention & control , Cognitive Dysfunction/epidemiology , Cognitive Dysfunction/diagnosis , Independent Living/trends , Aged, 80 and over , Frailty/epidemiology , Frailty/diagnosis , Frail Elderly/psychology , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Mass Screening/methods , Prevalence , Cross-Sectional Studies
4.
Global Health ; 20(1): 53, 2024 Jul 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38961440

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: With increasing trend of internet use in all age groups, whether internet use can prevent frailty in middle-aged and older adults remains unclear. METHODS: Five cohorts, including Health and Retirement Study (HRS), China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), English Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSA), and Mexican Health and Aging Study (MHAS), were used in this study. Internet use, social isolation, and frailty status was assessed using similar questions. The Generalized estimating equations models, random effects meta-analysis, COX regression, and mediation analysis were utilized. RESULTS: In the multicohort study, a total of 155,695 participants were included in main analysis. The proportion of internet use was varied across countries, ranging from 5.56% in China (CHARLS) to 83.46% in Denmark (SHARE). According to the generalized estimating equations models and meta-analysis, internet use was inversely associated with frailty, with the pooled ORs (95%CIs) of 0.72 (0.67,0.79). The COX regression also showed that participants with internet use had a lower risk of frailty incidence. Additionally, the association was partially mediated by social isolation and slightly pronounced in participants aged 65 and over, male, not working for payment, not married or partnered, not smoking, drinking, and not co-residence with children. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the important role of internet use in preventing frailty and recommend more engagements in social communication and activities to avoid social isolation among middle-aged and older adults.


Subject(s)
Developing Countries , Frailty , Internet Use , Humans , Aged , Male , Middle Aged , Female , Frailty/epidemiology , Internet Use/statistics & numerical data , Developed Countries , Longitudinal Studies , China/epidemiology , Aged, 80 and over , Social Isolation
5.
Aging Clin Exp Res ; 36(1): 140, 2024 Jul 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38965150

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia has been reported to play an important role in frailty syndrome. The serum creatinine/serum cystatin C ratio (Scr/Cys C ratio) has recently been recognized as a valuable indicator for assessing sarcopenia. However, few studies have examined the association between serum creatinine/serum cystatin C ratio and frailty. The objective of this study is to investigate the relationship between the serum creatinine/serum cystatin C ratio and frailty among older adults residing in the community. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A Total of 1926 community-dwelling older adults aged ≥ 60 years in the 2011 waves of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) were included. The participants' frailty status was determined using a 39 item frailty index (FI), which classified individuals as "robust" (FI ≤ 0.1), "pre-frailty" (0.1 < FI < 0.25), or "frailty" (FI ≥ 0.25). The Scr/Cys C ratio was determined by dividing the serum creatinine level (mg/dL) by the cystatin C level (mg/L). The one-way analysis of variance(ANOVA) and Chi-squared test (χ2)were applied to compare the differences between the 3 groups. Both linear regression and logistic regression models were used to further investigate the relationship between Scr/Cys C ratio and frailty. RESULTS: After adjusting for potential confounding factors, the study revealed that participants in the Q1 quartile of Scr/Cys C ratio had increased odds of frailty (Q1vs.Q4: OR = 1.880, 95% CI 1.126-3.139, p = 0.016) compared with those in the Q4 quartile group. In fully adjusted logistic regression models, male participants in the Q2 quartile of Scr/Cys C ratio were significantly correlated with higher odds of pre-frailty (Q2 vs.Q4: OR = 1.693, 95%CI 1.040-2.758, p = 0.034). However, this correlation was not observed in females (OR = 0.984, 95% CI 0.589-1.642, p = 0.950,). Additionally, the study observed an increase in both the frailty index and the incidence of frailty as age increased in both males and females. CONCLUSION: Among community-dwelling older adults, lower Serum creatinine to cystatin C ratio were found to be associated with increased odds of frailty prevalence in males.


Subject(s)
Creatinine , Cystatin C , Frailty , Independent Living , Humans , Cystatin C/blood , Male , Aged , Creatinine/blood , Female , Frailty/blood , Frailty/epidemiology , Aged, 80 and over , Incidence , Middle Aged , Frail Elderly/statistics & numerical data , China/epidemiology , Longitudinal Studies , Sarcopenia/blood , Sarcopenia/epidemiology , Sex Factors , Biomarkers/blood , Geriatric Assessment/methods
6.
BMC Geriatr ; 24(1): 580, 2024 Jul 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38965491

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There are many studies of medical costs in late life in general, but nursing home residents' needs and the costs of external medical services and interventions outside of nursing home services are less well described. METHODS: We examined the direct medical costs of nursing home residents in their last year of life, as well as limited to the period of stay in the nursing home, adjusted for age, sex, Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS), and diagnosis of dementia or advanced cancer. This was an observational retrospective study of registry data from all diseased nursing home residents during the years 2015-2021 using healthcare consumption data from the Stockholm Regional Council, Sweden. T tests, Wilcoxon rank sum tests and chi-square tests were used for comparisons of groups, and generalized linear models (GLMs) were constructed for univariable and multivariable linear regressions of health cost expenditures to calculate risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). RESULTS: According to the adjusted (multivariable) models for the 38,805 studied nursing home decedents, when studying the actual period of stay in nursing homes, we found significantly greater medical costs associated with male sex (RR 1.29 (1.25-1.33), p < 0.0001) and younger age (65-79 years vs. ≥90 years: RR 1.92 (1.85-2.01), p < 0.0001). Costs were also greater for those at risk of frailty according to the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) (intermediate risk: RR 3.63 (3.52-3.75), p < 0.0001; high risk: RR 7.84 (7.53-8.16), p < 0.0001); or with advanced cancer (RR 2.41 (2.26-2.57), p < 0.0001), while dementia was associated with lower medical costs (RR 0.54 (0.52-0.55), p < 0.0001). The figures were similar when calculating the costs for the entire last year of life (regardless of whether they were nursing home residents throughout the year). CONCLUSIONS: Despite any obvious explanatory factors, male and younger residents had higher medical costs at the end of life than women. Having a risk of frailty or a diagnosis of advanced cancer was strongly associated with higher costs, whereas a dementia diagnosis was associated with lower external, medical costs. These findings could lead us to consider reimbursement models that could be differentiated based on the observed differences.


Subject(s)
Nursing Homes , Registries , Terminal Care , Humans , Nursing Homes/economics , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Sweden/epidemiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Terminal Care/economics , Terminal Care/methods , Health Care Costs/trends , Frailty/economics , Frailty/epidemiology
7.
Trials ; 25(1): 429, 2024 Jun 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38951929

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Randomised trials are essential to reliably assess medical interventions. Nevertheless, interpretation of such studies, particularly when considering absolute effects, is enhanced by understanding how the trial population may differ from the populations it aims to represent. METHODS: We compared baseline characteristics and mortality of RECOVERY participants recruited in England (n = 38,510) with a reference population hospitalised with COVID-19 in England (n = 346,271) from March 2020 to November 2021. We used linked hospitalisation and mortality data for both cohorts to extract demographics, comorbidity/frailty scores, and crude and age- and sex-adjusted 28-day all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Demographics of RECOVERY participants were broadly similar to the reference population, but RECOVERY participants were younger (mean age [standard deviation]: RECOVERY 62.6 [15.3] vs reference 65.7 [18.5] years) and less frequently female (37% vs 45%). Comorbidity and frailty scores were lower in RECOVERY, but differences were attenuated after age stratification. Age- and sex-adjusted 28-day mortality declined over time but was similar between cohorts across the study period (RECOVERY 23.7% [95% confidence interval: 23.3-24.1%]; vs reference 24.8% [24.6-25.0%]), except during the first pandemic wave in the UK (March-May 2020) when adjusted mortality was lower in RECOVERY. CONCLUSIONS: Adjusted 28-day mortality in RECOVERY was similar to a nationwide reference population of patients admitted with COVID-19 in England during the same period but varied substantially over time in both cohorts. Therefore, the absolute effect estimates from RECOVERY were broadly applicable to the target population at the time but should be interpreted in the light of current mortality estimates. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN50189673- Feb. 04, 2020, NCT04381936- May 11, 2020.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hospitalization , Humans , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/epidemiology , Male , England/epidemiology , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Aged, 80 and over , SARS-CoV-2 , Comorbidity , Adult , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Frailty/epidemiology , Frailty/diagnosis , Frailty/mortality
8.
BMC Geriatr ; 24(1): 570, 2024 Jul 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38956490

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Frailty is an age-related condition with increased risk for adverse health outcomes. Assessing frailty according to the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) based on data from medical records is useful for previously unassessed patients, but the validity of such scores in exclusively geriatric populations and in patients with dementia is relatively unknown. METHODS: Patients admitted for the first time to one of two geriatric wards at Örebro University hospital between January 1st - December 31st, 2021, were included in this study if they had been appointed a CFS-score by anamnestic interview (CFSI) at admission. CFS scores based on medical records (CFSR) were appointed by a single medical student, who was blinded to the CFSI score. Score-agreement was evaluated with quadratic weighted Cohen's kappa (κ). RESULTS: In total, 145 patients between the age of 55-101 were included in the study. The CFSR and CFSI scores agreed perfectly in 102 cases (0.7, 95% CI 0.65-0.77). There was no significant difference regarding age, sex, comorbidity, or number of patients diagnosed with dementia between the patients with complete agreement and the patients whose scores did not agree. Agreement between the scores was substantial, κ = 0.66, 95% CI 0.53-0.80. CONCLUSIONS: CFS scores based on information from medical records can be generated with substantial agreement to CFS scores based on in-person anamnestic interviews. A dementia diagnosis does not influence the agreement between the scores. Therefore, these scores are a useful tool for assessing frailty in geriatric patients who previously lack a frailty assessment, both in clinical practice and future research. The results support previous findings, but larger studies are warranted.


Subject(s)
Frail Elderly , Frailty , Geriatric Assessment , Humans , Male , Aged , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Frailty/diagnosis , Frailty/epidemiology , Aged, 80 and over , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Middle Aged , Medical Records , Interviews as Topic/methods , Dementia/diagnosis , Dementia/epidemiology , Dementia/psychology
9.
Biom J ; 66(5): e202300200, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38988210

ABSTRACT

Spatial scan statistics are well-known methods widely used to detect spatial clusters of events. Furthermore, several spatial scan statistics models have been applied to the spatial analysis of time-to-event data. However, these models do not take account of potential correlations between the observations of individuals within the same spatial unit or potential spatial dependence between spatial units. To overcome this problem, we have developed a scan statistic based on a Cox model with shared frailty and that takes account of the spatial dependence between spatial units. In simulation studies, we found that (i) conventional models of spatial scan statistics for time-to-event data fail to maintain the type I error in the presence of a correlation between the observations of individuals within the same spatial unit and (ii) our model performed well in the presence of such correlation and spatial dependence. We have applied our method to epidemiological data and the detection of spatial clusters of mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease in northern France.


Subject(s)
Biometry , Models, Statistical , Humans , Biometry/methods , Kidney Failure, Chronic/epidemiology , Frailty/epidemiology , Time Factors , Proportional Hazards Models , Spatial Analysis
10.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 15: 1382516, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38994009

ABSTRACT

Background: The causality between frailty and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) has not yet been fully explored. A potential bidirectional causality was also needed to be confirmed. Methods: A bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) was conducted, with frailty-related data was collected from UK Biobank and TwinGen and GDM-related data was collected from the FinnGen consortium. We performed univariable and multivariable-adjusted MR with adjustments for body mass index (BMI). Several methodologies of MR were conducted to confirm the robustness of results. Results: Frailty was significantly associated with elevated risks of GDM (OR, 3.563; 95% CI, 1.737 to 7.309; P< 0.001) and GDM was also significantly associated with elevated risks of frailty ( ß , 0.087; 95% CI, 0.040 to 0.133; P< 0.001). There is no evidence demonstrating the existence of horizontal pleiotropy and heterogeneity. This association was robust after adjustments for BMI. The sensitivity analyses with Weighted median, Maximum likelihood, Penalised weighted median, MR Egger and MR PRESSO methods indicated consistent results. Conclusion: Our study provides evidence of the bidirectional causal association between frailty and GDM from genetic perspectives, signaling that the identification and assessment of frailty should become a standard strategy during the early stages and care of gestational diabetes.


Subject(s)
Diabetes, Gestational , Frailty , Mendelian Randomization Analysis , Humans , Diabetes, Gestational/genetics , Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiology , Female , Pregnancy , Frailty/genetics , Frailty/epidemiology , Adult , Body Mass Index , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
11.
Eur J Endocrinol ; 191(1): 75-86, 2024 Jul 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38970525

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We aim to investigate the association between bone mineral density (BMD) measurement and fragility fractures and assess the predictive value of combining BMD measurement and frailty for fracture risk assessment. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 5126 rural Koreans in the Chungju Metabolic Disease Cohort study. Frailty was defined using Fried's frailty phenotype. Fractures were assessed via structured medical interviews. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were calculated considering age, sex, body mass index, behavior, BMD, handgrip strength, medications, and comorbidities. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 5126 participants comprising 1955 (38.1%) males and 3171 (61.9%) females. Osteoporosis significantly increased the fracture risk across all types, except vertebral fracture, with adjusted OR (95% CI) of 1.89 (1.23-3.47) for any fracture, 2.05 (1.37-2.98) for hip fracture, 2.18 (1.06-4.50) for other fracture, and 1.71 (1.03-3.63) for major osteoporotic fracture (MOF). Frail individuals exhibited significantly increased risk for any fracture (OR 2.12; 95% CI, 1.21-3.71), vertebral fracture (2.48; 1.84-3.61), hip fracture (2.52; 1.09-3.21), other fracture (2.82; 1.19-8.53), and MOF (1.87; 1.01-3.47). The combination of frailty and BMD further increased the risks, with frail individuals demonstrating elevated ORs across BMD categories. In subgroup analyses, men showed a significant association between frailty with osteoporosis in hip fracture and MOF. Frail women with osteoporosis exhibited the highest risks for all fractures, particularly vertebral (OR 5.12; 95% CI, 2.07-9.68) and MOF (OR 5.19; 95% CI, 2.07-6.61). Age-specific analysis revealed that individuals aged 70 and older exhibited markedly higher fracture risks compared with those under 70. The combination of frailty and low BMD further elevated the fracture risk. Frailty was applied with BMD and demonstrated superior risk prediction for MOF compared with that with either score alone (area under the curve 0.825; P = .000). CONCLUSIONS: Combining frailty with BMD provides a more accurate fracture risk assessment for individuals over 50 years.


Subject(s)
Bone Density , Frailty , Independent Living , Osteoporotic Fractures , Rural Population , Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Frailty/epidemiology , Frailty/diagnosis , Osteoporotic Fractures/epidemiology , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Aged, 80 and over , Frail Elderly/statistics & numerical data , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Risk Assessment , Osteoporosis/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Cohort Studies , Risk Factors
12.
Swiss Med Wkly ; 154(6): 3400, 2024 Jun 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38980660

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The impact of impaired kidney function on healthcare use among medical hospitalisations with multimorbidity and frailty is incompletely understood. In this study, we assessed the prevalence of acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) among multimorbid medical hospitalisations in Switzerland and explored the associations of kidney disease with in-hospital outcomes across different frailty strata. METHODS: This observational study analysed nationwide hospitalisation records from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2020. We included adults (age ≥18 years) with underlying multimorbidity hospitalised in a medical ward. The study population consisted of hospitalisations with AKI, CKD or no kidney disease (reference group), and was stratified by three frailty levels (non-frail, pre-frail, frail). Main outcomes were in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) treatment, length of stay (LOS) and all-cause 30-day readmission. We estimated multivariable adjusted odds ratios (OR) and changes in percentage of log-transformed continuous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Among 2,651,501 medical hospitalisations with multimorbidity, 198,870 had a diagnosis of AKI (7.5%), 452,990 a diagnosis of CKD (17.1%) and 1,999,641 (75.4%) no kidney disease. For the reference group, the risk of in-hospital mortality was 4.4%, for the AKI group 14.4% (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.56 [95% CI 2.52-2.61]) and for the CKD group 5.9% (aOR 0.98 [95% CI 0.96-0.99]), while prevalence of ICU treatment was, respectively, 10.5%, 21.8% (aOR 2.39 [95% CI 2.36-2.43]) and 9.3% (aOR 1.01 [95% CI 1.00-1.02]). Median LOS was 5 days (interquartile range [IQR] 2.0-9.0) in hospitalisations without kidney disease, 9 days (IQR 5.0-15.0) (adjusted change [%] 67.13% [95% CI 66.18-68.08%]) in those with AKI and 7 days (IQR 4.0-12.0) (adjusted change [%] 18.94% [95% CI 18.52-19.36%]) in those with CKD. The prevalence of 30-day readmission was, respectively, 13.3%, 13.7% (aOR 1.21 [95% CI 1.19-1.23]) and 14.8% (aOR 1.26 [95% CI 1.25-1.28]). In general, the frequency of adverse outcomes increased with the severity of frailty. CONCLUSION: In medical hospitalisations with multimorbidity, the presence of AKI or CKD was associated with substantial additional hospitalisations and healthcare utilisation across all frailty strata. This information is of major importance for cost estimates and should stimulate discussion on reimbursement.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury , Hospital Mortality , Hospitalization , Multimorbidity , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Humans , Male , Female , Switzerland/epidemiology , Aged , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/epidemiology , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/mortality , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , Middle Aged , Acute Kidney Injury/epidemiology , Acute Kidney Injury/mortality , Acute Kidney Injury/therapy , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Frailty/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Aged, 80 and over , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence , Adult , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data
13.
Ann Acad Med Singap ; 53(6): 352-360, 2024 Jun 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38979991

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The global rise in ageing populations poses challenges for healthcare systems. By 2030, Singapore anticipates a quarter of its population to be aged 65 or older. This study addresses the dearth of research on frailty's impact on emergency laparotomy (EL) outcomes in this demographic, emphasising the growing significance of this surgical intervention. Method: Conducted at 2 tertiary centres in Singapore from January to December 2019, a retrospective cohort study examined EL outcomes in patients aged 65 or older. Frailty assessment, using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), was integrated into demographic, diagnostic and procedural analyses. Patient data from Tan Tock Seng Hospital and Khoo Teck Puat Hospital provided a comprehensive view of frailty's role in EL. Results: Among 233 participants, 26% were frail, revealing a higher vulnerability in the geriatric population. Frail individuals exhibited elevated preoperative risk, prolonged ICU stays, and significantly higher 90-day mortality (21.3% versus 6.4%). The study illuminated a nuanced connection between frailty and adverse outcomes, underlining the critical need for robust predictive tools in this context. Conclusion: Frailty emerged as a pivotal factor influencing the postoperative trajectory of older adults undergoing EL in Singapore. The integration of frailty assessment, particularly when combined with established metrics like P-POSSUM, showcased enhanced predictive accuracy. This finding offers valuable insights for shared decision-making and acute surgical unit practices, emphasising the imperative of considering frailty in the management of older patients undergoing emergency laparotomy.


Subject(s)
Frail Elderly , Frailty , Geriatric Assessment , Laparotomy , Humans , Singapore/epidemiology , Aged , Female , Male , Retrospective Studies , Laparotomy/statistics & numerical data , Laparotomy/methods , Frailty/epidemiology , Aged, 80 and over , Frail Elderly/statistics & numerical data , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Emergencies , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology
14.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 19(1): 398, 2024 Jul 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38982542

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis and frailty are two common features in the elderly population. Despite many review articles mentioning the association between osteoporosis and frailty, there is a lack of original research directly investigating their relationship. Therefore, this study was conducted to examine the correlation between osteoporosis and frailty. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), using logistic regression analysis to assess the association of osteoporosis with the frailty index. In addition, we further explored the causal relationship between them using Mendelian randomization (MR) study. RESULTS: In the cross-sectional study, 19,091 non-frailty participants and 5878 frailty participants were included in this study. We observed a significant positive association between osteoporosis and frailty after adjusting for demographic characteristics, body mass index (BMI), smoking, and alcohol use (OR = 1.454, 95% CI [1.142,1.851], P = 0.003). Moreover, the MR study showed a bidirectional causal relationship between osteoporosis and frailty. When osteoporosis was used as an exposure factor, the frailty pooled OR value calculated utilizing the inverse variance weighted (IVW) method was 2.81 (95% CI [1.69, 4.68], P = 6.82 × 10- 5). When frailty was used as an exposure factor, the OR value calculated using the IVW method was 1.01 (95% CI [1.00,1.01], P = 3.65 × 10- 7). CONCLUSIONS: Osteoporosis was positively correlated with frailty, and the results remained robust after adjusting for covariates. Further, MR studies have shown a bidirectional causal relationship between osteoporosis and frailty.


Subject(s)
Frailty , Mendelian Randomization Analysis , Osteoporosis , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Osteoporosis/epidemiology , Osteoporosis/genetics , Osteoporosis/complications , Female , Male , Frailty/genetics , Frailty/epidemiology , Aged , Nutrition Surveys , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Frail Elderly
15.
Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil ; 22(2): 191-199, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39023154

ABSTRACT

Screening for frailty syndrome, a marker of mortality risk, dependence, and institutionalization, is currently recommended in primary care to prevent its consequences effectively. Elderly diabetic individuals represent a significant and growing proportion of general practitioners' patient population, but their frailty status compared to the non-diabetic population is poorly understood. To study the relationship between diabetes and frailty in individuals aged 75 and older in general medicine. A total of 309 patients were included, among them 64 were diabetic patients, with a male/female ratio of 0.72. The proportion of frail elderly people was comparable between diabetics (24 %) and non-diabetics (27.6 %), as was the mean Fried score (1.78 vs. 1.56; not significant). Subgroup analysis revealed a significant difference in the risk of frailty, which was multiplied by 2.14 in diabetics without complications compared with non-diabetics, [95 % CI=2.03 to 2.25, p<2e(-16)]. Larger-scale studies at multiple outpatient sites should be conducted in general medicine among subjects aged over 75. Frailty management should be continued and carried out in patients whether they are diabetic or not.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Frail Elderly , Frailty , Humans , Male , Aged , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Aged, 80 and over , Frailty/epidemiology , Frail Elderly/statistics & numerical data , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Outpatients , Geriatric Assessment
16.
BMC Geriatr ; 24(1): 608, 2024 Jul 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39014306

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Older people living with frailty are at high risk of emergency hospital admission and often have complex care needs which may not be adequately met by conventional models of acute care. This has driven the introduction of adaptations to acute care pathways designed to improve outcomes in this patient group. The identification of differences in the organisational approach to frailty may highlight opportunities for quality improvement. METHODS: The Society for Acute Medicine Benchmarking audit is a national service evaluation which uses a single day-of-care methodology to record patient and organisational level data. All acute hospitals in the United Kingdom are eligible to participate. Emergency admissions referred to acute medical services between 00:00 and 23:59 on Thursday 23rd June 2022 were recorded. Information on the structure and operational design of acute frailty services was collected. The use of a validated frailty assessment tool, clinical frailty scale within the first 24 h of admission, assessment by an acute frailty service and clinical outcomes were reported in patients aged 70 year and above. A mixed effect generalised linear model was used to determine factors associated same-day discharge without overnight stay in patients with frailty. RESULTS: A total of 152 hospitals participated. There was significant heterogeneity in the operational design and staffing model of acute frailty services. The presence of an acute frailty unit was reported in 57 (42.2%) hospitals. The use of validated frailty assessment tools was reported in 117 (90.0%) hospitals, of which 107 (91.5%) used the clinical frailty scale. Patient-level data were recorded for 3604 patients aged 70 years and above. At the patient level, 1626 (45.1%) were assessed using a validated tool during the admission process. Assessment by acute frailty services was associated with an increased likelihood of same-day discharge (adjusted OR 1.55, 95%CI 1.03- 2.39). CONCLUSION: There is significant variation in the provision of acute frailty services. Frailty-related policies and services are common at the organisational level but implemented inconsistently at the patient level. Older people with frailty or geriatric syndromes assessed by acute frailty services were more likely to be discharged without the need for overnight bed-based admission.


Subject(s)
Frail Elderly , Frailty , Humans , Aged , Female , Male , Aged, 80 and over , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Frailty/therapy , Frailty/epidemiology , Frailty/diagnosis , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Emergency Service, Hospital , Health Care Surveys
17.
PeerJ ; 12: e17760, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39006023

ABSTRACT

Hypertension is one of the most common chronic diseases in older people, and the prevalence is on the rise as the global population ages. Hypertension is closely associated with many adverse health outcomes, including cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease and mortality, which poses a substantial threat to global public health. Reasonable blood pressure (BP) management is very important for reducing the occurrence of adverse events. Frailty is an age-related geriatric syndrome, characterized by decreased physiological reserves of multiple organs and systems and increased sensitivity to stressors, which increases the risk of falls, hospitalization, fractures, and mortality in older people. With the aging of the global population and the important impact of frailty on clinical practice, frailty has attracted increasing attention in recent years. In older people, frailty and hypertension often coexist. Frailty has a negative impact on BP management and the prognosis of older hypertensive patients, while hypertension may increase the risk of frailty in older people. However, the causal relationship between frailty and hypertension remains unclear, and there is a paucity of research regarding the efficacious management of hypertension in frail elderly patients. The management of hypertension in frail elderly patients still faces significant challenges. The benefits of treatment, the optimal BP target, and the choice of antihypertensive drugs for older hypertensive patients with frailty remain subjects of ongoing debate. This review provides a brief overview of hypertension in frail older adults, especially for the management of BP in this population, which may help in offering valuable ideas for future research in this field.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents , Frail Elderly , Hypertension , Humans , Hypertension/epidemiology , Hypertension/drug therapy , Aged , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Frailty/epidemiology , Aged, 80 and over , Risk Factors
18.
Isr J Health Policy Res ; 13(1): 26, 2024 Jul 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39010194

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Frailty, a significant risk factor for adverse outcomes and mortality, poses an emerging challenge with profound implications for public health and clinical practice. The measurement of frailty offers potential enhancements in healthcare services for older adults. The prevalence of frailty and its association with long-term mortality in a nationwide, unselected population of community-dwelling older adults, particularly those aged 75 and over, has not been previously studied on a large scale in Israel. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Meuhedet Health Maintenance Organization, Israel's third largest healthcare service provider, serving 1,276,000 people (13.8% of Israelis). The prevalence of frailty and its association with all-cause mortality were studied among older adults aged 75 years and over who were followed for 2-8 years. Frailty, defined by the cumulative deficit method, utilized clinical data from the preceding 10-year period, comprising 28 chronic diseases and age-related health deficits. RESULTS: The cohort included 43,737 older adults, with a median age of 77 years (IQR 75-82 years); among them, 19,300 (44.1%) were males. Overall, 19,396 (44.3%) older adults were frail: 12,260 (28.0%) mildly frail, 5,533 (12.7%) moderately frail and 1,603 (3.7%) severely frail. During the follow-up period 15,064 (34.4%) older adults died: 4,782 (39.0%) mildly frail, 3,016 (54.5%) moderately frail and 1,080 (67.4%) severely frail. Cox regression analysis demonstrated that mortality was associated with severe frailty (HR 2.63, 95%CI 2.45-2.80), moderate frailty (HR 2.05, 95%CI 1.96-2.14), and mild frailty (HR 1.45, 95%CI 1.39-1.51), independent of age, gender, and population sector. Among patients aged 90 years and over, no significant differences in cumulative survival were found between those with moderate and severe frailty (p = 0.408). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty is prevalent among community-dwelling Israeli older adults aged 75 years and over, and it is associated with long-term mortality. Considering its association with long-term mortality across frailty levels until the age of 90, early identification and intervention for frailty are recommended within this population. Policymakers should consider the use of the cumulative deficit method for evaluating frailty at both the population health and clinical levels.


Subject(s)
Frail Elderly , Frailty , Independent Living , Humans , Aged , Male , Female , Israel/epidemiology , Aged, 80 and over , Retrospective Studies , Frail Elderly/statistics & numerical data , Frailty/mortality , Frailty/epidemiology , Independent Living/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence , Mortality/trends , Risk Factors , Cohort Studies , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Geriatric Assessment/statistics & numerical data
19.
Age Ageing ; 53(7)2024 Jul 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39011637

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Frailty is increasingly present in patients with acute myocardial infarction. The electronic Frailty Index (eFI) is a validated method of identifying vulnerable older patients in the community from routine primary care data. Our aim was to assess the relationship between the eFI and outcomes in older patients hospitalised with acute myocardial infarction. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective cohort study using the DataLoch Heart Disease Registry comprising consecutive patients aged 65 years or over hospitalised with a myocardial infarction between October 2013 and March 2021. METHODS: Patients were classified as fit, mild, moderate, or severely frail based on their eFI score. Cox-regression analysis was used to determine the association between frailty category and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: In 4670 patients (median age 77 years [71-84], 43% female), 1865 (40%) were classified as fit, with 1699 (36%), 798 (17%) and 308 (7%) classified as mild, moderate and severely frail, respectively. In total, 1142 patients died within 12 months of which 248 (13%) and 147 (48%) were classified as fit and severely frail, respectively. After adjustment, any degree of frailty was associated with an increased risk of all-cause death with the risk greatest in the severely frail (reference = fit, adjusted hazard ratio 2.87 [95% confidence intervals 2.24 to 3.66]). CONCLUSION: The eFI identified patients at high risk of death following myocardial infarction. Automatic calculation within administrative data is feasible and could provide a low-cost method of identifying vulnerable older patients on hospital presentation.


Subject(s)
Frail Elderly , Frailty , Geriatric Assessment , Myocardial Infarction , Humans , Female , Male , Aged , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Aged, 80 and over , Retrospective Studies , Frailty/diagnosis , Frailty/mortality , Frailty/epidemiology , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Frail Elderly/statistics & numerical data , Risk Assessment/methods , Registries , Risk Factors , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Cause of Death
20.
CNS Neurosci Ther ; 30(6): e14762, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38924691

ABSTRACT

AIM: To evaluate the association between frailty and postoperative delirium (POD) in elderly cardiac surgery patients. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted of older patients admitted to the intensive care unit after cardiac surgery at a tertiary academic medical center in Boston from 2008 to 2019. Frailty was measured using the Modified Frailty Index (MFI), which categorized patients into frail (MFI ≥3) and non-frail (MFI = 0-2) groups. Delirium was identified using the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit and nursing notes. Logistic regression models were used to examine the association between frailty and POD, and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 2080 patients included (median age approximately 74 years, 30.9% female), 614 were frail and 1466 were non-frail. The incidence of delirium was significantly higher in the frail group (29.2% vs. 16.4%, p < 0.05). After adjustment for age, sex, race, marital status, Acute Physiology Score III (APSIII), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), albumin, creatinine, hemoglobin, white blood cell count, type of surgery, alcohol use, smoking, cerebrovascular disease, use of benzodiazepines, and mechanical ventilation, multivariate logistic regression indicated a significantly increased risk of delirium in frail patients (adjusted OR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.23-2.10, p < 0.001, E-value: 1.85). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty is an independent risk factor for POD in older patients after cardiac surgery. Further research should focus on frailty assessment and tailored interventions to improve outcomes.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Delirium , Frailty , Postoperative Complications , Humans , Female , Male , Aged , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Delirium/epidemiology , Delirium/etiology , Delirium/diagnosis , Frailty/diagnosis , Frailty/epidemiology , Aged, 80 and over , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Cohort Studies , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL