FIRE Stones: impact of forced diuresis on the residual fragment rate after flexible ureteroscopy for destruction of kidney stones with laser-protocol for a randomized controlled two-parallel group multicenter trial with blinding evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Lithiasis is a common and recurrent disease. Flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) is the cornerstone of laser treatment of kidney stones. Kidney stones destruction requires its laser pulverization into small fragments in order to remove them through the ureter or improve their spontaneous expulsion along the urinary tract. However, most of the time, all the micro-fragments and dust created cannot be extracted using our surgical tools and may stay intra-renally at the end of the procedure. Adjuvant treatments (such as forced diuresis, inversion or mechanical pressure) were previously described to improve the expulsion of stone fragments after extra-corporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Nevertheless, the impact of adjuvant treatment after fURS remains unclear and mainly theoretical. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective is to show that the injection of 40 mg of furosemide in slow intravenous during 10 min, after the procedure, increases the stone-free rate 3 months after a fURS for destruction of kidney stones with laser. METHODS/DESIGN: The study will be a two-parallel group randomized, controlled, multicentric trial with a blinding evaluation. Nine French departments of urology will participate. Patients will be randomized in 2 groups: the experimental group (injection of 40 mg of furosemide at the end of the surgery) and a control one (usual care). Patients will be followed up for 3 months (± 2 weeks) after the surgery. Then, we will perform a low dose abdomino-pelvic CT scan. The primary outcome is the stone-free rate at 3 months. A centralized review of the images will be performed by two specialized radiologists, in a blind and crossed way to allow a homogenization of the results. The secondary outcomes will include the rate of early post-operative urinary tract infection (UTI), the evaluation of post-operative pain, and the safety of the use of furosemide in patients treated by fURS for renal stone laser destruction. As secondary objectives, it is also planned to look at the effect of the prescription of an alpha-blocker as usual treatment on stone-free rate and to assess the agreement between the imaging analysis of the urologist and the specialized radiologist. DISCUSSION: Lithiasis is a public health problem. It affects about 10% of the general population. This prevalence is increasing (multiplied by 3 in 40 years), partly due to changes in the population's eating habits over the years. The lithiasis patient is a patient with a chronic disease requiring annual follow-up and who may suffer from multiple recurrences, with a recurrence rate at 5 years of 50%. Recurrences are partly due to residual fragments left in the kidneys at the end of the operation. Other risk factors for recurrence include dietary hygiene and the presence of an associated metabolic disease. The metabolic blood and urine tests recommended by the Association Française d'Urologie (AFU) can be used to manage these last two problems. As far as residual fragments are concerned, their presence leads to an early recurrence of stones because they form the bed for a new aggregation of crystals in the kidneys. Being able to reduce the rate of residual fragments in patients with the use of furosemide at the end of the intervention therefore seems essential in the management of recurrences in our patients. This will also improve our patients' quality of life. Indeed, lithiasis disease leads to chronic pain associated with acute pain that motivates consultations to the emergency for specialized management. This study is the first to evaluate the impact of forced diuresis with the use of furosemide on the stone-free rate after a fURS for destruction of kidney stone with laser. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05916963 , first received: 22 June 2023. EU Clinical Trials Register EudraCT Number: 2022-502890-40-00.

Hypocalcemia in the Immediate Postoperative Period Following Metabolic Bariatric Surgery - Hype or Harm?

PURPOSE: Hypocalcemia post-metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) is a known long-term complication after hypoabsorptive procedures. However, data on immediate postoperative calcium are limited. Our aim was to evaluate the prevalence of hypocalcemia on the 1st postoperative day after MBS and correlate it with potential associated factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed data from all consecutive index MBS over 1 year. We collected data on demographics and on preoperative and postoperative values of serum calcium (TC), albumin, adjusted calcium (AC-Payne formula), magnesium, phosphorus, preoperative vitamin-D, and postoperative 24-h urine output, intravenous fluids (IVF), bolus intravenous furosemide, and creatine phosphokinase (CPK). Continuous data are expressed as means ± SD (range). Categorical data are presented as frequencies (%). Linear regression was implemented to designate potential correlations. RESULTS: The cohort included 86 patients (58.1% females). The mean preoperative TC was 9.4mg/dL ± 0.4 (8.5-10.5) and mean postoperative TC 7.8mg/dL ± 0.6 (6.3-9.3, 17.0% decrease). The mean preoperative AC was 10.1mg/dL ± 0.4 (9.2-11.2) and mean postoperative AC 8.5mg/dL ± 0.6 (7.0-10.0, 15.8% decrease). Seventy-three patients (84.8%) had abnormally low TC (< 8.5mg/dL), and 43 (50%) abnormally low AC. There was only weak correlation between postoperative TC and AC with magnesium (r = 0.258), phosphorus (r = 0.269), vitamin-D (-0.163), 24-h urine output (r = -0.168), IVF (r = -0.237), bolus furosemide (r = 0.155), and mean operative time (r = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort of patients, hypocalcemia was a real problem but we did not find any significant correlation with the examined factors. Further studies are warranted to validate our findings and investigate other potential correlations.

Intralesional combined digoxin and furosemide versus intralesional 5-flurouracil for the treatment of recalcitrant plantar warts: a prospective, randomized study.

There are many therapeutic modalities for plantar warts, however treating it remains challenging. Intralesional injection of 5-fluorouarcil and combined digoxin and furosemide were observed to be effective and safe, however no comparison study between them was done. Our study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of both therapies in the treatment of plantar warts. 90 adult patients with multiple recalcitrant plantar warts were included in our study. They were randomly allocated to one of three groups; combined digoxin and furosemide, 5-fluorouarcil, or normal saline group. Fortnightly injections were done into all studied warts till complete clearance or up to 5 sessions. Warts were evaluated clinically and dermoscopically. Clinical response was reported in 24 patients (80%) of the combined digoxin and furosemide group with 40% complete response and in 24 patients (80%) of the 5-fluorouarcil group with 33.3% complete response. No statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups concerning efficacy and safety. Intralesional injection of 5-fluorouarcil and combined digoxin and furosemide are nearly equivalent in efficacy and safety for plantar wart treatment. Dermoscopy helps to take the truthful judgment about complete clearance of warts.

Hypocitraturia as a biomarker of renal tubular acidosis in patients with Sjögren's disease.

INTRODUCTION: Sjögren's disease (SD) is an immune-mediated chronic inflammatory disease that affects epithelial tissues, mainly salivary and lacrimal glands. It also presents extraglandular manifestations. The main renal manifestation is tubulointerstitial nephritis (TIN), which can manifest as renal tubular acidosis (RTA). Urinary citrate may be a biomarker of RTA in these patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether hypocitraturia is a predictive biomarker of RTA in a sample of patients with SD in a tertiary hospital in southern Brazil. METHODS: All patients with SD who met the inclusion criteria and who participated in the rheumatology outpatient clinic of the Irmandade Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre were included. Demographic, SD, serological and urinary data were obtained. RTA was considered in those patients who persistently presented urinary pH above 5.5 and serum pH below 7.35. Patients who persistently had urinary pH above 5.5 underwent a urinary acidification test with furosemide and fludrocortisone. These patients received 1 mg of fludrocortisone and 40 mg of furosemide and had their urine samples tested 2, 4 and 6 h after taking the medications. The test was stopped at any urine sample with pH 5.5 or less. The variables were expressed as mean and standard deviation or interquartile range. The association between hypocitraturia and RTA was assessed using the chi-square. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were included, 95.2% female with a median age of 61.73 years. The prevalence of complete distal RTA was 4.88%. Twenty-eight patients underwent urine acidification testing. Five patients had hypocitraturia, and two of them had complete distal RTA. The association between hypocitraturia and RTA was statistically significant (p < 0.012), with a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 91.2% and accuracy of 91.7%. The negative predictive value was 100%. The global renal assessment of the population demonstrated two patients with RTA, one patient with decreased renal function and six patients with proteinuria greater than 0.5 g/24 h. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of RTA in the studied population was 4.88%. Hypocitraturia had high sensitivity and accuracy for the diagnosis of RTA.

The acute effects of furosemide in acute heart failure assessed by remote dielectric sensing. A protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Intravenous loop diuretics have been a key component in treating pulmonary oedema since the 1960s and have a Class 1 recommendation in the 2021 guidelines for acute heart failure (AHF). While the diuretic effect of loop diuretics is well established, it remains unclear how furosemide influences pulmonary congestion and cardiac filling pressures in the hyperacute phase before significant diuresis occurs. METHODS: This was a prospective study of adult patients with AHF and objective signs of pulmonary congestion admitted to the cardiac ward. Remote dielectric sensing (ReDS) will directly measure lung fluid content, and cardiac filling pressures will be assessed by echocardiography with Doppler and strain analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This study will examine if furosemide leads to a hyperacute reduction in pulmonary congestion assessed by ReDS independent of diuretic effects in patients with AHF. We hypothesise that the haemodynamic effect of furosemide shown on pulmonary congestion may explain the subjective instant relief in patients with AHF receiving furosemide. FUNDING: Dr. Grand's salary during this project is supported by a research grant from the Danish Cardiovascular Academy funded by Novo Nordisk Foundation grant number NNF20SA0067242 and by the Danish Heart Foundation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This protocol was approved by the Scientific Ethical Committee, H-23029822, and the Danish Data Protection Agency P-2013-14703. The protocol was registered with ClinicalTrial.org on 29 August 2023 (Identifier: NCT06024889).

Evaluation of renal sodium handling in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A pilot study.

The pathophysiology behind sodium retention in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains poorly understood. We hypothesized that patients with HFpEF have impaired natriuresis and diuresis in response to volume expansion and diuretic challenge, which is associated with renal hypo-responsiveness to endogenous natriuretic peptides. Nine HFpEF patients and five controls received saline infusion (0.25 mL/kg/min for 60 min) followed by intravenous furosemide (20 mg or home dose) 2 h after the infusion. Blood and urine samples were collected at baseline, 2 h after saline infusion, and 2 h after furosemide administration; urinary volumes were recorded. The urinary cyclic guanosine monophosphate (ucGMP)/plasma B-type NP (BNP) ratio was calculated as a measure of renal response to endogenous BNP. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare the groups. Compared to controls, HFpEF patients had reduced urine output (2480 vs.3541 mL; p = 0.028), lower urinary sodium excretion over 2 h after saline infusion (the percentage of infused sodium excreted 12% vs. 47%; p = 0.003), and a lower baseline ucGMP/plasma BNP ratio (0.7 vs. 7.3 (pmol/mL)/(mg/dL)/(pg/mL); p = 0.014). Patients with HFpEF had impaired natriuretic response to intravenous saline and furosemide administration and lower baseline ucGMP/plasma BNP ratios indicating renal hypo-responsiveness to NPs.

Comparison of preventive effects of combined furosemide and mannitol versus single diuretics, furosemide or mannitol, on cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity.

Cisplatin (CDDP)-induced nephrotoxicity is a common dose-limiting toxicity, and diuretics are often administered to prevent nephrotoxicity. However, the efficacy and optimal administration of diuretics in preventing CDDP-induced nephrotoxicity remain to be established. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of combining furosemide and mannitol to prevent CDDP-induced nephrotoxicity. This was a post-hoc analysis of pooled data from a multicenter, retrospective, observational study, including 396 patients who received one or two diuretics for CDDP-based chemotherapy, compared using propensity score matching. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for nephrotoxicity. There was no significant difference in the incidence of nephrotoxicity between the two groups (22.2% vs. 28.3%, P = 0.416). Hypertension, CDDP dose ≥ 75 mg/m2, and no magnesium supplementation were identified as risk factors for nephrotoxicity, whereas the use of diuretics was not found to be a risk factor. The combination of furosemide and mannitol showed no advantage over a single diuretic in preventing CDDP-induced nephrotoxicity. The renal function of patients receiving CDDP-based chemotherapy (≥ 75 mg/m2) and that of those with hypertension should be carefully monitored. Magnesium supplementation is important for these patients.

Diuresis Efficacy in Ambulatory Congested Heart Failure Patients: Intrapatient Comparison of 3 Diuretic Regimens (DEA-HF).

BACKGROUND: Limited evidence exists regarding efficacy and safety of diuretic regimens in ambulatory, congestion-refractory, chronic heart failure (CHF) patients. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to compare the potency and safety of commonly used diuretic regimens in CHF patients. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, open-label, crossover study conducted in NYHA functional class II to IV CHF patients, treated in an ambulatory day-care unit. Each patient received 3 different diuretic regimens: intravenous (IV) furosemide 250 mg; IV furosemide 250 mg plus oral metolazone 5 mg; and IV furosemide 250 mg plus IV acetazolamide 500 mg. Treatments were administered once a week, in 1 of 6 randomized sequences. The primary endpoint was total sodium excretion, and the secondary was total urinary volume excreted, both measured for 6 hours post-treatment initiation. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients were recruited. Administration of furosemide plus metolazone resulted in the highest weight of sodium excreted, 4,691 mg (95% CI: 4,153-5,229 mg) compared with furosemide alone, 3,835 mg (95% CI: 3,279-4,392 mg; P = 0.015) and to furosemide plus acetazolamide 3,584 mg (95% CI: 3,020-4,148 mg; P = 0.001). Furosemide plus metolazone resulted in 1.84 L of urine (95% CI: 1.63-2.05 L), compared with 1.58 L (95% CI: 1.37-1.8); P = 0.039 collected following administration of furosemide plus acetazolamide and 1.71 L (95% CI: 1.49-1.93 L) following furosemide alone. The incidence of worsening renal function was significantly higher when adding metolazone (39%) to furosemide compared with furosemide alone (16%) and to furosemide plus acetazolamide (2.6%) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In ambulatory CHF patients, furosemide plus metolazone resulted in a significantly higher natriuresis compared with IV furosemide alone or furosemide plus acetazolamide.

Basal natriuresis as a predictor of diuretic resistance and clinical evolution in acute heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Some clinical guidelines recommend serial measurement of natriuresis to detect diuretic resistance (DR) in acute heart failure (AHF) patients, but it adds complexity to the management. OBJECTIVES: To correlate a single measurement of basal natriuresis (BN) on admission with the development of DR and clinical evolution in AHF hospitalized patients. METHODS: Prospective and multicenter study included AHF hospitalized patients, without shock or creatinine >2.5mg%. Patients received 40mg of intravenous furosemide on admission, then BN was measured, and diuretic treatment was guided by protocol. BN was considered low if <70 meq/L. DR was defined as the need of furosemide >240mg/day, tubular blockade (TB), hypertonic saline solution (HSS) or renal replacement therapy (RRT). In-hospital cardiovascular (CV) mortality, CV mortality and AHF readmissions at 60-day post-discharge were evaluated. RESULTS: 157 patients were included. BN was low in 22%. DR was development in 19% (12.7% furosemide >240mg/day, 8% TB, 4% RRT). Low NB was associated with DR (44% vs 12%; p 0.0001), persistence of congestion (26.5% vs 11.4%; p 0.05), furosemide >240 mg/day (29% vs 8%; p 0.003), higher cumulative furosemide dose at 72 hours (220 vs 160mg; p 0.0001), TB (20.6 vs 4.9%; p 0.008), RRT (11.8 vs 1.6%; p 0.02), worsening of AHF (27% vs 9%; p 0.01), inotropes use (21% vs 7%; p 0.48), respiratory assistance (12% vs 2%; p 0.02) and a higher in-hospital CV mortality (12% vs 4%; p 0.1). No association was demonstrated with post-discharge endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: In AHF patients, low BN was associated with DR, persistent congestion, need for aggressive decongestion strategies, and worse in-hospital evolution.

Diuretic response after neonatal cardiac surgery: a report from the NEPHRON collaborative.

BACKGROUND: Multicenter early diuretic response (DR) analysis of single furosemide dosing following neonatal cardiac surgery is lacking to inform whether early DR predicts adverse clinical outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study utilizing data from the NEPHRON registry. Random forest machine learning generated receiver operating characteristic-area under the curve (ROC-AUC) and odds ratios for mechanical ventilation (MV) and respiratory support (RS). Prolonged MV and RS were defined using ≥ 90th percentile of observed/expected ratios. Secondary outcomes were prolonged CICU and hospital length of stay (LOS) and kidney failure (stage III acute kidney injury (AKI), peritoneal dialysis, and/or continuous kidney replacement therapy on postoperative day three) assessed using covariate-adjusted ROC-AUC curves. RESULTS: A total of 782 children were included. Cumulative urine output (UOP) metrics were lower in prolonged MV and RS patients, but DR poorly predicted prolonged MV (highest AUC 0.611, OR 0.98, sensitivity 0.67, specificity 0.53, p = 0.006, 95% OR CI 0.96-0.99 for cumulative 6-h UOP) and RS (highest AUC 0.674, OR 0.94, sensitivity 0.75, specificity 0.54, p < 0.001, 95% CI 0.91-0.97 UOP between 3 and 6 h). Secondary outcome results were similar. DR had fair discrimination for kidney failure (AUC 0.703, OR 0.94, sensitivity 0.63, specificity 0.71, 95% OR CI 0.91-0.98, p < 0.001, cumulative 6-h UOP). CONCLUSIONS: Early DR poorly discriminated patients with prolonged MV, RS, and LOS in this cohort, though it may identify severe postoperative AKI phenotype. Future work is warranted to determine if early DR or late postoperative DR later, in combination with other AKI metrics, may identify a higher-risk phenotype.

On-treatment analysis of torsemide versus furosemide for patients hospitalized for heart failure: A post-hoc analysis of TRANSFORM-HF.

AIM: The TRANSFORM-HF trial demonstrated no significant outcome differences between torsemide and furosemide following hospitalization for heart failure (HF), but may have been impacted by non-adherence to the randomized diuretic. The current study sought to determine the treatment effect of torsemide versus furosemide using an on-treatment analysis inclusive of all randomized patients except those confirmed non-adherent to study diuretic. METHODS AND RESULTS: TRANSFORM-HF was an open-label, pragmatic randomized trial of 2859 patients hospitalized for HF from June 2018 through March 2022. Patients were randomized to a loop diuretic strategy of torsemide versus furosemide with investigator-selected dosage. This post-hoc on-treatment analysis included all patients alive with either known or unknown diuretic status, and excluded patients confirmed to be non-adherent to study diuretic. This modified on-treatment definition was applied separately at time of hospital discharge and 30-day follow-up. All-cause mortality and hospitalization outcomes were assessed over 12 months. Overall, 2570 (89.9%) and 2374 (83.0%) patients were included in on-treatment analyses at discharge and 30-day follow-up, respectively. There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between torsemide and furosemide in patients on-treatment at discharge (17.5% vs. 17.8%; hazard ratio [HR] 1.01 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83-1.22], p = 0.96) and at 30-day follow-up (14.5% vs. 15.0%; HR 1.02 [95% CI 0.81-1.27], p = 0.90). All-cause mortality or all-cause hospitalization was similar between torsemide and furosemide in patients who were on-treatment at discharge (58.3% vs. 61.3%; HR 0.92 [95% CI 0.82-1.03]) and 30-day follow-up (60.9% vs. 64.4%; HR 0.93 [95% CI 0.82-1.05]). In patients who were on-treatment at 30-day follow-up, there were 677 total hospitalizations in the torsemide group and 686 total hospitalizations in the furosemide group (rate ratio 0.99 [95% CI 0.86-1.14], p = 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: In TRANSFORM-HF, a post-hoc on-treatment analysis did not meaningfully differ from the original trial results. Among those deemed compliant with the assigned diuretic, there remained no significant difference in mortality or hospitalization after HF hospitalization with a strategy of torsemide versus furosemide. CLINICAL TRAIL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03296813.

Utility of F-15 diuretic MAG3 renography in assessment of paediatric hydronephrosis.

INTRODUCTION: Diuretic renography is crucial in evaluation of paediatric hydronephrosis. Furosemide is conventionally given 15-20 min after radiolabelled tracer (F+15/F+20 protocol), however this is equivocal in around 15% of patients. Giving furosemide 15 min prior to tracer (F-15 MAG3 protocol) has been suggested as an additional tool in the investigation of patients with suspected upper urinary tract obstruction. However, the role of this method in assessment and management of paediatric hydronephrosis is not widely reported. OBJECTIVE: To investigate utility of F-15 renograms in children with hydronephrosis being assessed for Pelvi-Ureteric Junction Obstruction (PUJO). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of patients <16 years old undergoing F-15 MAG3 renogram between 2018 and 2021 in our tertiary paediatric surgical centre. Data collected included patient demographics, mode of presentation, investigations, management and outcomes. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were included. Median age at F-15 renogram was 7.3 years. Eleven patients presented with antenatal hydronephrosis, 5 with symptoms in childhood and 2 with incidental hydronephrosis on trauma imaging. Fourteen patients were symptomatic. Ten had a prior non-obstructed F+20 renogram but persisting symptoms suggestive of PUJO. Seven had previous equivocal F+20 renograms. One symptomatic patient directly underwent an F-15 renogram. A conclusive result was obtained in 16/18 (89%); 11 patients had obstructed curves and 5 non-obstructed. Two asymptomatic patients' scans were inconclusive. All symptomatic patients had conclusive scans. Of 11 patients with an obstructed F-15, 9 have undergone pyeloplasty to date. All have had post-operative resolution in symptoms and static or improved post-operative ultrasound. One patient with an inconclusive scan underwent pyeloplasty due to persisting hydronephrosis and parent preference. Three patients with non-obstructed F-15 renograms have been discharged. One symptomatic patient with a non-obstructive F-15 had a ureteric stent inserted due to persistent flank pain; 1 continues under surveillance. DISCUSSION: It is known that conventional F+20 MAG3 renograms can give equivocal results. Published experience suggests that F-15 renograms are conclusive in the majority of patients. Routine primary use is, however, discouraged as they can 'over diagnose' obstruction and limit the study of tracer transit under physiological flow rates. This study indicates that the F-15 renogram is a useful adjunct in the assessment of patients with symptoms suggestive of PUJO who have previously had an equivocal or a non-obstructed F+20 renogram. CONCLUSION: F-15 renogram was conclusive in 89% of patients. We recommend using F-15 renograms to aid surgical decision-making in children with equivocal F+20 renograms, especially in the presence of symptoms.

Impact of baseline kidney dysfunction on oral diuretic efficacy following hospitalization for heart failure - insights from TRANSFORM-HF.

AIM: Among patients discharged after hospitalization for heart failure (HF), a strategy of torsemide versus furosemide showed no difference in all-cause mortality or hospitalization. Clinicians have traditionally favoured torsemide in the setting of kidney dysfunction due to better oral bioavailability and longer half-life, but direct supportive evidence is lacking. METHODS AND RESULTS: The TRANSFORM-HF trial randomized patients hospitalized for HF to a long-term strategy of torsemide versus furosemide, and enrolled patients across the spectrum of renal function (without dialysis). In this post-hoc analysis, baseline renal function during the index hospitalization was assessed as categories of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; <30, 30-<60, ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2). The interaction between baseline renal function and treatment effect of torsemide versus furosemide was assessed with respect to mortality and hospitalization outcomes, and the change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary score (KCCQ-CSS). Of 2859 patients randomized, 336 (11.8%) had eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m2, 1138 (39.8%) had eGFR 30-<60 ml/min/1.73 m2, and 1385 (48.4%) had eGFR ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2. Baseline eGFR did not modify treatment effects of torsemide versus furosemide on all adverse clinical outcomes including individual components or composites of all-cause mortality and all-cause (re)-hospitalizations, both when assessing eGFR categorically or continuously (p-value for interaction all >0.108). Similarly, no treatment effect modification by eGFR was found for the change in KCCQ-CSS (p-value for interaction all >0.052) when assessing eGFR categorically or continuously. CONCLUSION: Among patients discharged after hospitalization for HF, there was no significant difference in clinical and patient-reported outcomes between torsemide and furosemide, irrespective of renal function.

Serial direct sodium removal in patients with heart failure and diuretic resistance.

AIMS: Loop diuretics may exacerbate cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) in heart failure (HF). Direct sodium removal (DSR) using the peritoneal membrane, in conjunction with complete diuretic withdrawal, may improve CRS and diuretic resistance. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with HF requiring high-dose loop diuretics were enrolled in two prospective, single-arm studies: RED DESERT (n = 8 euvolaemic patients), and SAHARA (n = 10 hypervolaemic patients). Loop diuretics were withdrawn, and serial DSR was utilized to achieve and maintain euvolaemia. At baseline, participants required a median 240 mg (interquartile range [IQR] 200-400) oral furosemide equivalents/day, which was withdrawn in all participants during DSR (median time of DSR 4 weeks [IQR 4-6]). Diuretic response (queried by formal 40 mg intravenous furosemide challenge and 6 h urine sodium quantification) increased substantially from baseline (81 ± 37 mmol) to end of DSR (223 ± 71 mmol, p < 0.001). Median time to re-initiate diuretics was 87 days, and the median re-initiation dose was 8% (IQR 6-10%) of baseline. At 1 year, diuretic dose remained substantially below baseline (30 [IQR 7.5-40] mg furosemide equivalents/day). Multiple dimensions of kidney function such as filtration, uraemic toxin excretion, kidney injury, and electrolyte handling improved (p < 0.05 for all). HF-related biomarkers including N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, carbohydrate antigen-125, soluble ST2, interleukin-6, and growth differentiation factor-15 (p < 0.003 for all) also improved. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HF and diuretic resistance, serial DSR therapy with loop diuretic withdrawal was feasible and associated with substantial and persistent improvement in diuretic resistance and several cardiorenal parameters. If replicated in randomized controlled studies, DSR may represent a novel therapy for diuretic resistance and CRS. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: RED DESERT (NCT04116034), SAHARA (NCT04882358).

Urinary Cell Cycle Arrest Biomarkers and Diuretic Efficiency in Acute Heart Failure.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the association between the NephroCheck® test AKIRisk® score, diuretic efficiency (DE), and the odds of worsening kidney function (WKF) within the first 72 h of admission in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure (AHF). METHODS: The study prospectively enrolled 125 patients admitted with AHF. NephroCheck® test was obtained within the first 24 h of admission. DE was defined as net fluid urine output per 40 mg of furosemide equivalents. RESULTS: The median AKIRisk® score was 0.11 (IQR 0.06-0.34), and 38 (30.4%) patients had an AKIRisk® score >0.3. The median cumulative DE at 72 h was 1,963 mL (IQR 1317-3,239 mL). At 72 h, a total of 10 (8%) patients developed an absolute increase in sCr ≥0.5 mg/dL (WKF). In a multivariable setting, there was an inverse association between the AKIRisk® score and DE within the first 72 h. In fact, the highest the AKIRisk® score (centered at 0.3), the higher the likelihood of poor DE (below the median) and WKF at 72 h (odds ratio [OR] 2.04; 95%; CI: 1.02-4.07; p = 0.043, and OR 3.31, 95% CI: 1.30-8.43; p = 0.012, respectively). CONCLUSION: In patients with AHF, a higher NephroCheck® AKIRisk® score is associated with poorer DE and a higher risk of WKF at 72 h. Further research is needed to confirm the role of urinary cell cycle arrest biomarkers in the AHF scenario.

Diuretic use and outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: Insights from the VICTORIA trial.

AIMS: In VICTORIA, vericiguat compared with placebo reduced the risk of cardiovascular death (CVD) and heart failure hospitalization (HFH) in patients enrolled after a worsening heart failure (WHF) event. We examined clinical outcomes and efficacy of vericiguat as it relates to background use of loop diuretics in patients with WHF. METHODS AND RESULTS: We calculated the total daily loop diuretic dose equivalent to furosemide dosing at randomization and categorized these as: no loop diuretic, 1-39, 41-80, 40, and >80 mg total daily dose (TDD). The primary composite outcome of CVD/HFH and its components were evaluated based on TDD loop diuretic and expressed as adjusted hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Post-randomization rates of change in TDD were also examined. Of 4974 patients (98% of the trial) with diuretic dose information available at randomization, 540 (10.8%) were on no loop diuretic, 647 (13.0%) were on 1-39, 1633 (32.8%) were on 40, 1185 (23.8%) were on 41-80, and 969 (19.4%) were on >80 mg TDD. Patients with higher TDD had a higher rate of primary and secondary clinical outcomes. There were no significant interactions with TDD at randomization and efficacy of vericiguat versus placebo for any outcome (all pinteraction > 0.5). Post-randomization diuretic dose changes for vericiguat and placebo showed similar rates of up-titration (19.6 and 20.2/100 person-years), down-titration (16.8 and 18.1/100 person-years), and stopping diuretics (22.9 and 24.2/100 person-years). CONCLUSIONS: Loop diuretic TDD at randomization was independently associated with worse outcomes in this high-risk population. The efficacy of vericiguat was consistent across the range of diuretic doses.

Effect of pregabalin initiation on diuretic requirements in patients with chronic heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Literature on pregabalin use in patients with heart failure is largely limited to patient case reports and cohort studies. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of pregabalin initiation on diuretic requirements in patients with heart failure. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients with heart failure who were started on pregabalin between January 1, 2014, and September 1, 2021, at the Veterans Affairs North Texas Health Care System was used. The primary objective was to determine the median change in loop diuretic dose, in furosemide dose equivalents, 6 months after pregabalin initiation. RESULTS: Of 58 patients analyzed, there was no statistically significant difference in the primary outcome (P = 0.162). The secondary outcomes were found to be nonstatistically significant, and there was no correlation between pregabalin dose and outcomes. CONCLUSION: This represents the largest analysis of diuretic dose requirements in patients with heart failure after initiation of pregabalin. Although there was no difference in the median change of diuretic dose prescribed, pregabalin should still be used with caution.

Furosemide to lower antenatal severe hypertension: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are a leading cause of perinatal morbidity, and timely treatment of severely elevated blood pressure is recommended to prevent serious sequelae. In acute hypertension marked by increased blood volume, it is unknown whether diuretics used as an adjunct to antihypertensive medications lead to more effective blood pressure control. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate whether the addition of intravenous furosemide to first-line antihypertensive agents reduces systolic blood pressure in acute-onset, severe antenatal hypertension with wide (≥60 mm Hg) pulse pressure. STUDY DESIGN: In this double-blinded randomized trial, participants received 40 mg of intravenous furosemide or placebo in addition to a first-line antihypertensive agent. The primary outcome was mean systolic blood pressure during the first hour after intervention. Secondary outcomes included corresponding diastolic blood pressure; systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and pulse pressure at 2 hours after intervention; total reduction from qualifying blood pressure; duration of blood pressure control; need for additional antihypertensive doses within 1 hour; and electrolytes and urine output. A sample size of 35 participants per group was planned to detect a 15-mm Hg difference in blood pressure. RESULTS: Between January 2021 and March 2022, 65 individuals were randomized: 33 to furosemide and 32 to placebo. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. There was no difference in the primary outcome of mean 1-hour systolic blood pressure (147 [14.8] vs 152 [13.8] mm Hg; P=.200). We found a reduction in 2-hour systolic blood pressure (139 [18.5] vs 154 [18.4] mm Hg; P=.007) and a decrease in 2-hour pulse pressure (55 [12.5] vs 67 [15.1]; P=.003) in the furosemide group. Subgroup analysis according to hypertension type showed a significant reduction in 2-hour systolic blood pressure and 2-hour pulse pressure among patients with new-onset hypertension, but not among those with preexisting hypertension. Urine output was greater in the furosemide group, with no difference in electrolytes and creatinine before and after intervention. CONCLUSION: Intravenous furosemide in conjunction with a first-line antihypertensive agent did not significantly reduce systolic blood pressure in the first hour after administration. However, both systolic blood pressure and pulse pressure at 2 hours were decreased in the furosemide group. These findings suggest that a 1-time dose of intravenous furosemide is a reasonable adjunct to achieve blood pressure control, particularly in patients in whom increased volume is suspected.

Loop diuretic down-titration at discharge in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure.

AIMS: The current literature provides limited guidance on the best diuretic strategy post-hospitalization for acute heart failure (AHF). It is postulated that the efficacy and safety of the outpatient diuretic regimen may be significantly influenced by the degree of fluid overload (FO) encountered during hospitalization. We hypothesize that in patients with more pronounced FO, reducing their regular oral diuretic dosage might be associated with an elevated risk of unfavourable clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: It was a retrospective observational study of 410 patients hospitalized for AHF in which the dose of furosemide at admission and discharge was collected. Patients were categorized across diuretic dose status into two groups: (i) the down-titration group and (ii) the stable/up-titration group. FO status was evaluated by a clinical congestion score and circulating biomarkers. The endpoint of interest was the composite of time to all-cause death and/or heart failure readmission. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model was constructed to analyse the endpoints. The median age was 86 (78-92) years, 256 (62%) were women, and 80% had heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. After multivariate adjustment, the down-titration furosemide equivalent dose remained not associated with the risk of the combined endpoint in the whole sample (hazard ratio 1.34, 95% confidence interval 0.86-2.06, P = 0.184). The risk of the combination of death and/or worsening heart failure associated with the diuretic strategy at discharge was significantly influenced by FO status, including clinical congestion scores and circulating proxies of FO like BNP and cancer antigen 125. CONCLUSIONS: In patients hospitalized for AHF, furosemide down-titration does not imply an increased risk of mortality and/or heart failure readmission. However, FO status modifies the effect of down-titration on the outcome. In patients with severe congestion or residual congestion at discharge, down-titration was associated with an increased risk of mortality and/or heart failure readmission.