Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.077
Filter
3.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39197445

ABSTRACT

The implementation of equal opportunities is a challenge for the staff of an anaesthesia department. At the Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine at Hannover Medical School, a local Gender Equality plan has been implemented to create a secure and transparent framework for reconciling scientific and clinical careers with family responsibilities. Today, family and career should be equally compatible for men and women. Unfortunately, in medical professions it is often still an either/or decision. At the same time, it is important to offer an attractive workplace in view of the increasing shortage of qualified staff. In order to provide equal opportunities for all employees and to increase satisfaction, it is necessary for employers to address the issues of equality and work-life balance, to identify challenges and to create structures for improvement.


Subject(s)
Gender Equity , Humans , Female , Male , Germany , Anesthesiology/organization & administration , Physicians, Women , Sexism/prevention & control
4.
BMC Womens Health ; 24(1): 469, 2024 Aug 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39182073

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Gender inequities remain critical determinants influencing maternal health. Harmful gender norms and gender-based violence adversely affect maternal health. Gendered division of labour, lack of access to and control of resources, and limited women's decision-making autonomy impede women's access to maternal healthcare services. We undertook a cluster randomized controlled trial of universal home visits to pregnant women and their spouses in one local government area in Bauchi State, North-Eastern Nigeria. The trial demonstrated a significant improvement in maternal and child health outcomes and male knowledge, attitudes and behaviours. This paper qualitatively evaluates gender equity in the home visits programme. METHODS: The research team explored participants' views about gender equity in the home visits programme. We conducted nine key informant interviews with policymakers and 14 gender and age-stratified focus group discussions with men and women from visited households, with women and men home visitors and supervisors, and with men and women community leaders. Analysis used an adapted conceptual framework exploring gender equity in mainstream health. A deductive thematic analysis of interviews and focus group reports looked for patterns and meanings. RESULTS: All respondents considered the home visits programme to have a positive impact on gender equity, as they perceived gender equity. Visited women and men and home visitors reported increased male support for household chores, with men doing heavy work traditionally pre-assigned to women. Men increased their support for women's maternal health by paying for healthcare and providing nutritious food. Households and community members confirmed that women no longer needed their spouses' permission to use health services for their own healthcare. Households and home visitors reported an improvement in spousal communication. They perceived a significant reduction in domestic violence, which they attributed to the changing attitudes of both women and men due to the home visits. All stakeholder groups stressed the importance of engaging male spouses in the home visits programme. CONCLUSION: The home visits programme, as implemented, contributed to gender equity.


Subject(s)
Focus Groups , Gender Equity , House Calls , Qualitative Research , Humans , Nigeria , Female , House Calls/statistics & numerical data , Male , Adult , Pregnancy , Spouses/psychology , Spouses/statistics & numerical data , Maternal Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
6.
BMJ Open Ophthalmol ; 9(1)2024 Jul 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39089733

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In 2020, almost 100 million people were blind or visually impaired from cataract. Cataract surgery is a cost-effective treatment for cataracts. In Nigeria, twice as many women are cataract blind as men. Cataract surgical rate (CSR, the number of cataract operations per million population per year in a defined geographical location) is an output indicator of cataract surgical services. The recommended target CSR for sub-Saharan Africa is 1000/year. The aim of this study was to assess the CSR in men and women in Imo state, Nigeria. METHODS: A retrospective review of cataract surgery undertaken in all eye health facilities in Imo State in 2019. Data collected included the type and location of facilities, patient demographics and the number and type of cataract operations performed in each facility. The CSR was calculated overall, in men and women, and in younger and older women. RESULTS: The CSR overall was 330/million and was slightly higher in women (347/million) than in men (315/million) (p<0.001). More elderly women (≥65 years) accessed cataract surgery through outreach than men and younger women (OR 1.5 (95% CI 1.03 to 2.22, p=0.03) and 1.6 (95% CI 1.07 to 2.44, p=0.02)), respectively. CONCLUSION: The overall CSR in Imo state was approximately one-third of that recommended for sub-Saharan Africa. Although the CSR was higher in women than in men, considerably higher CSRs are needed in women to address their higher burden of cataract blindness. Operational and intervention science research are needed, to identify and evaluate interventions which address demand and supply barriers to accessing cataract surgery, particularly for elderly women.


Subject(s)
Cataract Extraction , Cataract , Humans , Cataract Extraction/statistics & numerical data , Nigeria/epidemiology , Female , Male , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Middle Aged , Cataract/epidemiology , Gender Equity , Adult , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Sex Distribution , Aged, 80 and over , Blindness/epidemiology , Blindness/etiology
7.
Copenhagen; World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe; 2024-08-29.
in English | WHO IRIS | ID: who-378547

ABSTRACT

The Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study is a large school-based survey carried out every four years in collaboration with the WHO Regional Office for Europe. HBSC data are used at national/regional and international levels to gain new insights into adolescent health and well-being, understand the social determinants of health and inform policy and practice to improve young people’s lives. The 2021/2022 HBSC survey data are accompanied by a series of volumes that summarize the key findings around specific health topics. This report, Volume 5in the series, focuses on adolescent sexual health, using the unique HBSC evidence on the sexual health of adolescents aged 15 years across 42 countries and regions in Europe, central Asia and Canada (two of the 44 countries and regions in the study could not collect data on sexual behaviours). It describes the current sexual health status of adolescents by analysing their sexual initiation, contraceptive pill and condom use (or non-use) at last sexual intercourse, the role of gender, age and social inequality, and how adolescent sexual behaviour has changed over time. Findings from the 2021/2022 HBSC survey provide an important evidence benchmark for current research, intervention and policy-planning.


Subject(s)
Socioeconomic Factors , Health Behavior , Health Status Disparities , Gender Equity , Adolescent Health , Sexual Health , Sex Education
8.
PLoS One ; 19(7): e0306121, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39018269

ABSTRACT

The Gender Inequality Index is a country-level measure of gender inequality based on women's levels of reproductive health, social and political empowerment, and labor-market representation. In two studies, we tested the validity of the GII-S, a state-level measure of gender inequality in the USA. In Study 1, the GII-S was associated with objective and subjective measures of wellness among women, including life satisfaction, financial well-being, and perceptions of safety. GII-S was not associated with the Gini coefficient, a well-established measure of economic inequality, suggesting that gender and economic disparities represent distinct aspects of social inequality. Study 2 tested the link between GII-S scores and collective action-specifically, participation in the #MeToo movement promoting awareness of sexual harassment and violence against women. Analysis of geo-localized messages on the Twitter social media platform reveals that higher GII-S scores were associated with fewer tweets containing the #MeToo hashtag. Moreover, GII-S was associated with state-level political orientation: the more conservative a state, the higher its level of gender inequality. Results are discussed in terms of possible socio-cognitive processes underpinning the association between gender inequality and sensitivity to violence against women.


Subject(s)
Feminism , Gender Equity , Social Media , Humans , Female , United States , Politics , Male , Socioeconomic Factors , Sexual Harassment/statistics & numerical data
9.
PLoS One ; 19(7): e0298812, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39018326

ABSTRACT

International concern for the human rights of Afghan women has spiked since the Taliban consolidated power in Afghanistan in fall 2021. Yet little is known about how to effectively advocate for women's human rights under this new context. We present findings from a random sample of all adult Afghan internet users' attitudes toward peace, security, gender, and human rights and find significant support for women's human rights as a national priority within Afghanistan, even when controlling for other priorities and even among many men and women aligned with the Taliban. Given that men now have much more political power in Afghan society to protect women's rights, we paid particular attention to men's attitudes toward women's human rights. Our evidence from an embedded survey experiment, building on earlier literature from other countries, demonstrates that fathers of eldest daughters are particularly likely to favor prioritizing women's rights when primed to think about the gender of their eldest children. Thus, the human rights and humanitarian community should spend more time and attention engaging with this demographic, and specifically creating marketing and advocacy strategies that encourage men to think about or act on behalf of their eldest daughters.


Subject(s)
Attitude , Human Rights , Humans , Female , Afghanistan , Male , Adult , Gender Equity , Women's Rights , Surveys and Questionnaires , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Adolescent
10.
Chimia (Aarau) ; 78(6): 431-438, 2024 Jun 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38946417

ABSTRACT

For this CHIMIA special issue on the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the coincidental 10th anniversary of the association of Women in Natural Sciences (WiNS) at ETH Zurich, there is no better opportunity to share what we have achieved in the last decade. WiNS was originally founded by female PhD students and PostDocs at the Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences (D-CHAB) and has expanded to include three additional departments at ETH Zurich. Join us in celebrating our anniversary, reflecting on what we and other associations with the same mission have done to promote gender equality and reduced inequalities for all. We invite you to reflect on what yet has to be done to enact a systemic change towards achieving equal opportunities for all, rather than simply accommodating the female perspective to Switzerland's predominantly masculine working culture.


Subject(s)
Anniversaries and Special Events , Female , Switzerland , Humans , Natural Science Disciplines , Gender Equity
11.
F1000Res ; 13: 729, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39070854

ABSTRACT

Gender equality in decision-making positions is crucial to achieving the goals of good governance, peace, democracy, and inclusive/sustainable development. The major aim of this research article is to investigate the representation trend of women in higher decision-making positions over the last thirty years, since 1991. The federal three organs of government (law formulating, law enforcing, and law interpreting bodies) were the focus of this research. This research is a mixed type of research that inculcates both qualitative and quantitative data types. Secondary data sources from relevant government institutions were mostly used. The data was analyzed through content analysis of documents and presented via descriptive data presenting techniques. The research findings reveal that although women's representation in positions of decision-making has advanced considerably in recent years, the empirical data throughout the previous thirty years demonstrated the underrepresentation of women in higher leadership positions within the Ethiopian federal government. Furthermore, Women never held certain higher-level government leadership positions, such as the Prime Minister position, which seems to be forbidden for women. Women made up 23%, 19%, 19%, and 24% of the House of Peoples Representatives (HPR), the House of Federation (HoF), ministerial posts, and judicial bodies, respectively over the last three decades. Women are visibly underrepresented in the executive positions as compared to others. Thus, substantial policy and practical initiatives are needed to remove institutional, social, and economic barriers to boost women's advanced visibility in senior leadership roles.


Subject(s)
Leadership , Humans , Ethiopia , Female , Gender Equity
12.
Int J Equity Health ; 23(1): 148, 2024 Jul 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39080665

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Existing evidence suggests that organisation-level policies are important in enabling gender equality and equity in the workplace. However, there is little research exploring the knowledge of health sector employees on whether policies and practices to advance women's career progression exist in their organisations. In this qualitative study, we explored the knowledge and perspectives of health managers on which of their organisations' workplace policies and practices contribute to the career advancement of women and their knowledge of how such policies and practices are implemented and monitored. METHODS: We employed a purposive sampling method to select the study participants. The study adopted qualitative approaches to gain nuanced insights from the 21 in-depth interviews and key informant interviews that we conducted with health managers working in public and private health sector organisations. We conducted a thematic analysis to extract emerging themes relevant to advancing women's career progression in Kenya's health sector. RESULTS: During the interviews, only a few managers cited the policies and practices that contribute to women's career advancement. Policies and practices relating to promotion and flexible work schedules were mentioned most often by these managers as key to advancing women's career progression. For instance, flexible work schedules were thought to enable women to pursue further education which led to promotion. Some female managers felt that women were promoted to leadership positions only when running women-focused programs. There was little mention of capacity-building policies like training and mentorship. The health managers reported how policies and practices are implemented and monitored in general, however, they did not state how this is done for specific policies and practices. For the private sector, the health managers stated that implementation and monitoring of these policies and practices is conducted at the institutional level while for the public sector, this is done at the national or county level. CONCLUSIONS: We call upon health-sector organisations in Kenya to offer continuous policy sensitisation sessions to their staff and be deliberate in having supportive policies and other pragmatic interventions beyond policies such as training and mentorship that can enable women's career progression.


Subject(s)
Career Mobility , Qualitative Research , Workplace , Humans , Kenya , Female , Workplace/psychology , Organizational Policy , Gender Equity , Adult , Middle Aged , Interviews as Topic
13.
Eur J Radiol ; 178: 111628, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39084031

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Our study aimed to determine the current percentage of gender and sex equity promoting (GSEP) radiology journals, defined as satisfying at least one criterion of the Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) checklist, published by the European Association of Science Editors (EASE). A secondary objective was to compare characteristics of GSEP and non-GSEP journals. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis between June 24 and July 3, 2023, was conducted. The author submission guidelines of radiology journals with a 2021 Journal Impact Factor (JIF) were assessed according to the SAGER checklist. GSEP journals were defined as satisfying one or more SAGER checklist criteria in their research instructions. Bibliometric data and journal information were collected from the Journal Citation Reports and National Library of Medicine catalogue. RESULTS: Only 39.7 % (52) of 132 journals satisfied at least one SAGER checklist criterion. Median 2021 JIFs were higher in GSEP journals (4.62, IQR: 3.73 - 5.21) than non-GSEP journals (2.70, IQR: 2.32) (p = 0.00). Median 2021 Journal Citation Index (JCI) scores were higher in GSEP (0.64, 0.56 - 0.73) than non-GSEP journals (0.97, 0.83 - 1.10) (p = 0.00). Cited half-life was shorter for GSEP (5.40, 4.80 - 6.50) than non-GSEP journals (6.70, 5.70 - 7.40) (p = 0.05). Elsevier published 33 of 52 of GSEP journals. CONCLUSION: 60.3% of radiology journals with a 2021 JIF do not meet a single SAGER checklist criterion in their author submission guidelines. GSEP journals had higher impact and source metrics and a shorter cited half-life. Publishers may play a significant role in promoting endorsement of the SAGER checklist in the author submission guidelines of radiology journals.


Subject(s)
Periodicals as Topic , Radiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Radiology/standards , Humans , Checklist , Gender Equity , Female , Bibliometrics , Journal Impact Factor , Male , Guidelines as Topic , Editorial Policies
16.
Clin Ter ; 175(Suppl 1(4)): 92-96, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39054990

ABSTRACT

Background: Gender gap is a neologism that identifies the disparity between social and professional conditions experienced by females compared to males. The disparity increases as one ascends the academic hierarchy. In recent years, the debate has expanded, and more options have been planned for the elimination of the current gender gap. Methods: This research was conducted by examining the landscape of the gender gap, particularly in the academic forensic medicine field. Our analysis involved reviewing papers published between 2006 and 2024, identified through electronic database searches (PubMed). The search terms used were: "gender gap" AND "academic" AND "medicine" AND "leadership." In total, we analyzed 85 papers. Additionally, we examined data from forensic medicine residency programs. Conclusions: The representation of women in medicine is well-known. Despite the increasing number of women in leadership positions in medicine, they still lag significantly behind men. These data highlight a situation that could be seen as grounds for an accusation of "academic abuse". In the Italian forensic residency programs, less than 20% are led by women, and among these, not all hold the rank of full professor. Although a certain rebalancing is already underway, the gap is still significant. There are already regulations obliging local authorities to promote gender equality in councils, companies, and institutions under their jurisdiction. It would be desirable to consider minimum quotas for female participation in university competitions. This would be a first step toward eliminating the gender gap in academic and forensic medical fields.


Subject(s)
Sexism , Female , Humans , Male , Faculty, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Forensic Medicine/education , Gender Equity , Internship and Residency/statistics & numerical data , Italy , Leadership , Physicians, Women/statistics & numerical data , Sexism/statistics & numerical data
17.
J Environ Manage ; 366: 121733, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39047434

ABSTRACT

Countries have become increasingly concerned about the impact of their activities and their alignment with sustainable development goals. Consequently, it is necessary to examine their performance efficiency in a unified manner, accounting for economic, environmental, and social variables. A country's performance efficiency is defined as the ratio of observed output to frontier output, given the country's productive resources. In this paper, we use the frontier technique of Data envelopment analysis (DEA) to estimate the frontier output. The objective of this study is to assess the performance efficiency of 111 worldwide countries and to examine whether gender inequality, the share of renewable energy consumption, the government control of corruption and government expenditure on education could explain differences in performance. We employed the non-parametric DEA model using three inputs (capital, labor, and primary energy consumption) and one output (GDP). We also considered an additional output (CO2 emissions); however, the results were identical to the one output model because CO2 emissions and primary energy consumption are highly correlated (0.96). We find that there is a negative impact of gender inequality, a positive impact of the share of renewable energy consumption and government control of corruption on performance efficiency. Our results also indicate that reducing CO2 emissions required transitioning towards renewable energy and using the energy efficiently. However, we did not find a positive relationship between government expenditures on education and country efficiency.


Subject(s)
Renewable Energy , Renewable Energy/economics , Government , Gender Equity , Humans , Carbon Dioxide/analysis
18.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 482(8): 1351-1357, 2024 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39031037

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Women remain underrepresented in leadership roles, faculty roles, and among residents in orthopaedic surgery. It has been suggested that having women in leadership positions in orthopaedic surgery may help to increase the gender diversity of residency programs. However, to our knowledge, no study has explored the relationship, if any, between the gender of the residency program director and the percentage of women in the residency program. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Is the program director's gender associated with differences in the percentage of women orthopaedic surgery residents? (2) Do women and men differ in the time to appointment of program director? METHODS: A list of 207 orthopaedic surgery residencies was obtained from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) website for the academic year 2021 to 2022. The study excluded 6% (13) of programs; 4% (8) were those without ACGME accreditation and those with initial accreditation, and 2% (5) did not have updated 2021 to 2022 resident lists. Descriptive information on 194 programs was obtained from publicly accessible resources from July 2021 through July 2022. The institution's website and the American Medical Association's (AMA) Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database (FREIDA) was used to collect residency program characteristics and resident demographics [ 2 ]. Doximity, Healthgrades, and LinkedIn were used to further collect current orthopaedic surgery residency program director demographics, including gender, age, and education/training history. To determine gender, photographs and pronouns (she/her/hers or he/him/hers) used in their biographies were used first. To confirm this, secondary sources were used including their NPI profile, which lists gender; Doximity; and their LinkedIn profile. Scopus was used to analyze research output by the program directors-using the Hirsch index (h-index) as the primary bibliometric metric. A total of 194 program directors were identified, of whom of 12% (23) were women and 88% (171) were men. Of the 4421 total residents among these programs, 20% (887) were women and 80% (3534) were men. A univariate analysis comparing program directors was conducted, with continuous variables analyzed using an independent-sample t-test and categorical variables analyzed using a Pearson chi-square test. With the numbers available, a post hoc statistical power calculation indicated that we could detect an 32% difference in the percentage of women in a program as significant with 80% power at the p < 0.05 level, whereas we might have been underpowered to discern smaller differences than that. RESULTS: With the numbers available, we found no difference in the percentage of women in residency programs run by women program directors than in programs in which the program director was a man (22% [125 of 558] versus 20% [762 of 3863], mean difference 2% [95% CI -1.24% to 7.58%]; p = 0.08). Comparing women to men program directors, women had fewer years between residency completion and appointment to the position of program director (8 ± 2 years versus 12 ± 7 years, mean difference 4 years [95% CI 2.01 to 7.93 years]; p = 0.02) and had a lower mean h-index (7 ± 4 versus 11 ± 11, mean difference 4 [95% CI 1.70 to 6.56]; p = 0.03) and number of publications (24 ± 23 versus 41 ± 62, mean difference 17 [95% CI 3.98 to 31.05]; p = 0.01), although they did not differ in terms of their advanced degrees, duration of training, or likelihood of having taken a fellowship. CONCLUSION: Orthopaedic residency programs that were run by women did not contain a higher percentage of women residents, suggesting that the gender of the individual in that role may not be as important as has been speculated by others. Future studies should investigate the intersectionality of gender, race, and ethnicity of residents, program directors, and current faculty. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The fact that women were placed in program director roles earlier in career may also carry special jeopardy for them. Those roles are difficult and can impair a faculty member's ability to conduct individual research, which often is key to further academic promotions. Given that and the fact that the gender of the program director was not associated with differences in gender composition of residency programs, we believe that increasing mentorship and access to pipeline programs will help promote diversity in residency programs.


Subject(s)
Internship and Residency , Leadership , Orthopedics , Physicians, Women , Humans , Internship and Residency/statistics & numerical data , Female , Male , Physicians, Women/statistics & numerical data , Orthopedics/education , Education, Medical, Graduate , United States , Orthopedic Surgeons/education , Sex Factors , Physician Executives/statistics & numerical data , Gender Equity , Accreditation , Sexism , Orthopedic Procedures/education
19.
PLoS One ; 19(7): e0303811, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38990805

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Previous research has shown that women report more psychosomatic complaints at work than men. However, knowledge about gender inequalities in psychosomatic complaints within occupational groups and specific symptoms is lacking. This study aims to compare gender inequalities in psychosomatic complaints in the occupational groups of white-collar high-skilled, white-collar low-skilled, blue-collar high-skilled and blue-collar low-skilled workers. METHODS: The study implemented a cross sectional design using data from the nationwide German Employment Survey of the Working Population on Qualification and Working Conditions conducted in 2017/ 2018. Psychosomatic complaints were operationalised by the following symptoms: headache, insomnia, tiredness, irritability, dejection, physical fatigue, and emotional fatigue. N = 20012 working German-speaking respondents were sampled. After excluding persons with missing data on the study variables, the sample consisted of N = 16359 persons. RESULTS: Women reported significantly more psychosomatic complaints than men in the subgroups of white-collar high-skilled and white-collar low-skilled (ps < .05), inequalities in blue-collar high-skilled and blue-collar low-skilled only being numerical. Regarding specific symptoms, women reported more psychosomatic complaints then men in the subgroups of white-collar high-skilled workers, white-collar low-skilled workers, and blue-collar low-skilled workers. Headaches, physical fatigue, and emotional fatigue were the most common symptoms. The white-collar high-skilled subgroup had the highest number of symptoms with significant gender inequalities. These effects remained after controlling for age, working hours, parental status and marital status. CONCLUSIONS: Gender inequalities in psychosomatic complaints are ubiquitous but vary in their frequency by occupational subgroup and specific psychosomatic complaint. Women in white-collar high-skilled jobs in particular report to be burdened more often by many specific psychosomatic symptoms. Future studies should investigate the reasons for these occupational inequalities and develop interventions to reduce health inequalities in the workplace.


Subject(s)
Gender Equity , Psychophysiologic Disorders , Workplace , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Fatigue/epidemiology , Fatigue/psychology , Germany/epidemiology , Headache/epidemiology , Headache/psychology , Occupations , Psychophysiologic Disorders/epidemiology , Psychophysiologic Disorders/psychology , Sex Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Workplace/psychology , White People
20.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol ; 44(9): 1916-1924, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38957985

ABSTRACT

Institutional support is crucial for the successful career advancement of all faculty but in particular those who are women. Evolving from the past, in which gender disparities were prevalent in many institutions, recent decades have witnessed significant progress in supporting the career advancement of women faculty in science and academic medicine. However, continued advancement is necessary as previously unrecognized needs and new opportunities for improvement emerge. To identify the needs, opportunities, and potential challenges encountered by women faculty, the Women's Leadership Committee of the Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology Council developed an initiative termed GROWTH (Generating Resources and Opportunities for Women in Technology and Health). The committee designed a survey questionnaire and interviewed 19 leaders with roles and responsibilities in faculty development from a total of 12 institutions across various regions of the United States. The results were compiled, analyzed, and discussed. Based on our interviews and analyses, we present the current status of these representative institutions in supporting faculty development, highlighting efforts specific to women faculty. Through the experiences, insights, and vision of these leaders, we identified success stories, challenges, and future priorities. Our article provides a primer and a snapshot of institutional efforts to support the advancement of women faculty. Importantly, this article can serve as a reference and resource for academic entities seeking ideas to gauge their commitment level to women faculty and to implement new initiatives. Additionally, this article can provide guidance and strategies for women faculty as they seek support and resources from their current or prospective institutions when pursuing new career opportunities.


Subject(s)
Career Mobility , Faculty, Medical , Leadership , Physicians, Women , Humans , Female , Faculty, Medical/trends , Physicians, Women/trends , United States , Women, Working , Gender Equity , Sexism/trends , Surveys and Questionnaires , Staff Development/trends , Biomedical Research/trends
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL