Leaving no patient behind! Expert recommendation in the use of innovative technologies for diagnosing rare diseases.

Genetic diagnosis plays a crucial role in rare diseases, particularly with the increasing availability of emerging and accessible treatments. The International Rare Diseases Research Consortium (IRDiRC) has set its primary goal as: "Ensuring that all patients who present with a suspected rare disease receive a diagnosis within one year if their disorder is documented in the medical literature". Despite significant advances in genomic sequencing technologies, more than half of the patients with suspected Mendelian disorders remain undiagnosed. In response, IRDiRC proposes the establishment of "a globally coordinated diagnostic and research pipeline". To help facilitate this, IRDiRC formed the Task Force on Integrating New Technologies for Rare Disease Diagnosis. This multi-stakeholder Task Force aims to provide an overview of the current state of innovative diagnostic technologies for clinicians and researchers, focusing on the patient's diagnostic journey. Herein, we provide an overview of a broad spectrum of emerging diagnostic technologies involving genomics, epigenomics and multi-omics, functional testing and model systems, data sharing, bioinformatics, and Artificial Intelligence (AI), highlighting their advantages, limitations, and the current state of clinical adaption. We provide expert recommendations outlining the stepwise application of these innovative technologies in the diagnostic pathways while considering global differences in accessibility. The importance of FAIR (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reusability) and CARE (Collective benefit, Authority to control, Responsibility, and Ethics) data management is emphasized, along with the need for enhanced and continuing education in medical genomics. We provide a perspective on future technological developments in genome diagnostics and their integration into clinical practice. Lastly, we summarize the challenges related to genomic diversity and accessibility, highlighting the significance of innovative diagnostic technologies, global collaboration, and equitable access to diagnosis and treatment for people living with rare disease.

Pregnancy Planning and Genetic Testing: Exploring Advantages, and Challenges.

Pregnancy planning and genetic testing (PPGT) has emerged as a tool in reproductive healthcare, offering parents-to-be insight in their risks of having a child with a genetic disorder. This paper reviews the advantages, drawbacks and challenges associated with PPGT, providing some practical guidance for health care professionals. Advantages include identification of genetic risks, a possibility to informed reproductive decision-making, and the potential to reduce the parents-to-be risk for an affected child. Challenges and drawbacks include provision of service, ethical considerations, genetic counselling complexities, and the need to increase public and professional awareness by comprehensive education and accessibility. Practical guidance involves considerations for selecting appropriate candidates, counselling strategies, and how to integrate PPGT into existing healthcare frameworks. By addressing these factors, PPGT can offer an increased reproductive informed choice for the individual and the couple reducing the burden of disease in the family.

Ethical Aspects of Human Genome Research in Sports-A Narrative Review.

Human genome research in sports raises complex ethical considerations regarding the intersection of genetics and athletic performance. Pursuing genetic enhancements must uphold fairness, equality, and respect for human dignity. This narrative review explores the ethical dimensions of human genome research in sports, its potential implications on athletes, and the integrity of sports. As a narrative review, this study synthesizes the existing literature and expert insights to examine the ethical aspects of human genome research in sports. This study extensively examined the current literature on genetics, sports performance, ethical concerns, human rights, and legal regulations within the European context. The literature was searched using the SPORTDiscus, Scopus, Google Scholar, and PubMed databases. Exploring human genome research in sports reveals significant ethical implications, including potential genetic discrimination, impacts on human rights, and creating a genetic underclass of athletes. There are also definite benefits surrounding genetic testing. In conclusion, this review contends that integrating ethical considerations into developing and applying genetic technologies in sports is crucial to upholding fundamental principles of fairness, equality, and respect for human dignity. It stresses the importance of open and inclusive dialogue about the potential consequences of genetic advancements on athletic performance, future generations, and the integrity of sports.

Diagnostic tests for primary immunodeficiency disorders: Classic and genetic testing.

Primary immunodeficiency diseases encompass a variety of genetic conditions characterized by a compromised immune system and typically results in increased susceptibility to infection. In fact, they also manifest as autoimmunity, autoinflammation, atopic diseases, and malignancy. Currently, the number of recognized monogenic primary immunodeficiency disorders is set at ∼500 different entities, owing to the exponential use of unbiased genetic testing for disease discovery. In addition, the prevalence of secondary immunodeficiency has also been on the rise due to the increased use of immunosuppressive drugs to treat diseases based on immune dysregulation, an increase in the number of individuals undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and other chronic medical conditions, including autoimmunity. Although the clinical symptoms of immunodeficiency disorders are broad, an early diagnosis and tailored management strategies are essential to mitigate the risk of infections and prevent disease-associated morbidity. Generally, the medical history and physical examination can provide useful information that can help delineate the possibility of immune defects. In turn, this makes it feasible to select focused laboratory tests that identify immunodeficiency disorders based on the specific immune cells and their functions or products that are affected. Laboratory evaluation involves quantitative and functional classic testing (e.g., leukocyte counts, serum immunoglobulin levels, specific antibody titers in response to vaccines, and enumeration of lymphocyte subsets) as well as genetic testing (e.g., individual gene evaluation via Sanger sequencing or unbiased evaluation based on next-generation sequencing). However, in many cases, a diagnosis also requires additional advanced research techniques to validate genetic or other findings. This article updates clinicians about available laboratory tests for evaluating the immune system in patients with primary immunodeficiency disorders. It also provides a comprehensive list of testing options, organized based on different components of host defense.

Screening Familial Risk for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.

Importance: Most patients with pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants for breast cancer have not undergone genetic testing. Objective: To identify patients meeting family history criteria for genetic testing in the electronic health record (EHR). Design, Setting, and Participants: This study included both cross-sectional (observation date, February 1, 2024) and retrospective cohort (observation period, January 1, 2018, to February 1, 2024) analyses. Participants included patients aged 18 to 79 years enrolled in Renown Health, a large health system in Northern Nevada. Genotype was known for 38 003 patients enrolled in Healthy Nevada Project (HNP), a population genomics study. Exposure: An EHR indicating that a patient is positive for criteria according to the Seven-Question Family History Questionnaire (hereafter, FHS7 positive) assessing familial risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were the presence of P/LP variants in the ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, or PALB2 genes (cross-sectional analysis) or a diagnosis of cancer (cohort analysis). Age-adjusted cancer incidence rates per 100 000 patients per year were calculated using the 2020 US population as the standard. Hazard ratios (HRs) for cancer attributable to FHS7-positive status were estimated using cause-specific hazard models. Results: Among 835 727 patients, 423 393 (50.7%) were female and 29 913 (3.6%) were FHS7 positive. Among those who were FHS7 positive, 24 535 (82.0%) had no evidence of prior genetic testing for HBOC in their EHR. Being FHS7 positive was associated with increased prevalence of P/LP variants in BRCA1/BRCA2 (odds ratio [OR], 3.34; 95% CI, 2.48-4.47), CHEK2 (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.05-2.43), and PALB2 (OR, 2.84; 95% CI, 1.23-6.16) among HNP female individuals, and in BRCA1/BRCA2 (OR, 3.35; 95% CI, 1.93-5.56) among HNP male individuals. Being FHS7 positive was also associated with significantly increased risk of cancer among 131 622 non-HNP female individuals (HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.22-1.70) but not among 114 982 non-HNP male individuals (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.87-1.42). Among 1527 HNP survey respondents, 352 of 383 EHR-FHS7 positive patients (91.9%) were survey-FHS7 positive, but only 352 of 883 survey-FHS7 positive patients (39.9%) were EHR-FHS7 positive. Of the 29 913 FHS7-positive patients, 19 764 (66.1%) were identified only after parsing free-text family history comments. Socioeconomic differences were also observed between EHR-FHS7-negative and EHR-FHS7-positive patients, suggesting disparities in recording family history. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, EHR-derived FHS7 identified thousands of patients with familial risk for breast cancer, indicating a substantial gap in genetic testing. However, limitations in EHR family history data suggested that other identification methods, such as direct-to-patient questionnaires, are required to fully address this gap.

Current Practices in Genetic Testing for Prostate Cancer: The Indian Scenario.

BACKGROUND: Despite genetic testing being recommended by international guidelines for the selection of targeted therapy for prostate cancer (PCa), limited data are available on genetic testing for PCa in India. OBJECTIVES: The objective is to understand the current genetic testing practice pattern for PCa in India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A panel of 9 experts developed and validated a premeeting online questionnaire comprising 12 objective questions. The questionnaire was circulated from February 2022 to May 2022 among medical oncologists and uro-oncologists across pan-India, followed by response collection over 3 months. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize results and concluding statements were formulated on current genetic testing practice patterns for PCa. RESULTS: A total of 103 responses were received. Genetic testing was advised by 35.9% of the participants in <5% of patients with PCa. Patients with a family history of PCa (88.3%) were most commonly referred for genetic testing. Nearly half (50.2%) of the participants routinely tested for homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes; 52% used blood and tissue as the most preferred specimen for performing genetic testing and 44.7% followed the testing sequence of tumor tissue followed by blood. Major barriers to genetic testing were affordability and scarcity of genetic counselors, while a major change could be brought by making it cost-effective and improving access to medication. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a lower prescription frequency of genetic testing for the HRR gene across pan-India. Improving the quality and access to genetic testing and the availability of cost-effective-targeted therapies will aid in delivering personalized care to patients with metastatic PCa.

[Genetic testing in neurological diseases: a practical guide]. / Pruebas genéticas en enfermedades neurológicas: guía práctica.

During the last decades, genomic medicine has made it possible to bring the knowledge of molecular genetics to the field of medical consultation. There are several studies that contribute to the diagnosis, the definition of prognoses, as well as the possibility of providing genetic counseling based on accurate scientific data. Advances in genomic sequencing have promoted the reclassification of entities according to an etiological criterion. Such is the case of epileptic encephalopathies, ataxias, dystonias, among many other neurological conditions. Its implementation requires strategies aimed at achieving the best diagnostic yield. This requires a greater understanding of the molecular bases of each of these practices, as well as their scope. They allow reducing the time until a certain diagnosis is made and the possibility, in some cases, of improving the quality of life of those affected with the use of tailored treatments. The objective of this article was to describe current laboratory studies, their scope and emphasize the algorithms for the study of genetic diseases in general, focusing the attention on those specific to neuropediatrics, in order to promote good practices, avoiding confusion, errors, and unnecessary expenditures of money and shortening the so-called "diagnostic odyssey".

Durante las últimas décadas la medicina genómica ha llevado al ámbito de la consulta médica los conocimientos de la genética molecular. Existe un número de estudios que contribuyen en el diagnóstico, la definición de pronósticos y posibilitan un asesoramiento genético basado en datos científicos certeros. En algunas enfermedades, los avances en la secuenciación genómica, ha promovido la reclasificación de entidades según un criterio etiológico, como las encefalopatías epilépticas, las ataxias, las distonías, entre muchas condiciones médicas. Su implementación requiere, por parte de los médicos, de estrategias tendientes a alcanzar el mejor rédito diagnóstico. Es necesario para ello, una mayor comprensión de las bases moleculares de estas prácticas, así como sus alcances. Permiten reducir los tiempos hasta la concreción de un diagnóstico de certeza y la posibilidad, en algunos casos, de mejorar la calidad de vida de los afectados con la utilización de tratamientos a la medida. El objetivo de este artículo fue describir las técnicas de laboratorio actuales, sus alcances y enfatizar los algoritmos de estudio de las enfermedades genéticas, haciendo hincapié en aquellas propias de la neuropediatría, a fin de propiciar las buenas prácticas, evitando confusiones, errores, erogaciones innecesarias de dinero y acortando la llamada "odisea diagnóstica".

The Genetics of Obesity.

Understanding the genetic causes of obesity permits anticipatory guidance and targeted treatments. Children with hyperphagia and severe early-onset obesity should receive genetic testing for rare monogenic and syndromic disorders caused by pathogenic variants involving a single gene or single chromosomal region. Gene panels covering the leptin pathway, the key regulator of energy balance, are becoming more widely available and at lower cost. Polygenic obesity is much more common and involves multiple genes throughout the genome, although the overlap in genes for rare and common disorders suggests a spectrum of severity and the potential of shared precision medicine approaches for treatment.

Genetic Testing Among Breast Cancer Patients in the Eastern Region of Saudi Arabia: Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Genetic testing for persons with a heightened likelihood of harboring a germline mutation permits early identification and appropriate management. This study aimed to identify the proportion of breast cancer (BC) patients who were offered genetic testing and the prevalence of BRCA mutations among them. Additionally, we assessed the demographic and clinical features of BC patients in the Eastern Region of Saudi Arabia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 2535 patients with BC were retrieved from the registry between 2017 and 2021. The data were analyzed and presented using univariate and bivariate statistics. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals using logistic regression analysis were computed to identify the predictors of BRCA testing. RESULTS: Patients with BC ranged in age from 18 to 103 years, and the mean age was 49.60 ± 12.14 years. BC was detected in men in 29 (1.1%) cases. Among diagnosed patients with BC, a total of 96 (3.7%) patients underwent testing for BRCA gene mutations. Of them, 36 (37.5%) patients had a BRCA gene mutation. The likelihood of undergoing BRCA testing was higher for those who were diagnosed with the condition before the age of 50, patients who were referred from private institutions, and patients with a history of previously diagnosed cancer. The likelihood of conducting BRCA testing was significantly lower among those with distant metastases. CONCLUSION: The proportion of BRCA testing among BC patients was found to be relatively low. The development of a cost-effective, locally developed risk assessment tool that incorporates genetic counseling and testing for those with a familial predisposition to BC is imperative.

Clinical-grade whole genome sequencing-based haplarithmisis enables all forms of preimplantation genetic testing.

High-throughput sequencing technologies have increasingly led to discovery of disease-causing genetic variants, primarily in postnatal multi-cell DNA samples. However, applying these technologies to preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) in nuclear or mitochondrial DNA from single or few-cells biopsied from in vitro fertilised (IVF) embryos is challenging. PGT aims to select IVF embryos without genetic abnormalities. Although genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS)-based haplotyping methods enabled PGT for monogenic disorders (PGT-M), structural rearrangements (PGT-SR), and aneuploidies (PGT-A), they are labour intensive, only partially cover the genome and are troublesome for difficult loci and consanguineous couples. Here, we devise a simple, scalable and universal whole genome sequencing haplarithmisis-based approach enabling all forms of PGT in a single assay. In a comparison to state-of-the-art GBS-based PGT for nuclear DNA, shallow sequencing-based PGT, and PCR-based PGT for mitochondrial DNA, our approach alleviates technical limitations by decreasing whole genome amplification artifacts by 68.4%, increasing breadth of coverage by at least 4-fold, and reducing wet-lab turn-around-time by ~2.5-fold. Importantly, this method enables trio-based PGT-A for aneuploidy origin, an approach we coin PGT-AO, detects translocation breakpoints, and nuclear and mitochondrial single nucleotide variants and indels in base-resolution.

Genomic Landscape of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Implications for Clinical Practice.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are the second most prevalent neoplasms of the pancreas with variable prognosis and clinical course. Our knowledge of the genetic alterations in patients with pNETs has expanded in the past decade with the availability of whole-genome sequencing and germline testing. This review will focus on potential clinical applications of the genetic testing in patients with pNETs. For somatic testing, we discuss the commonly prevalent somatic mutations and their impact on prognosis and treatment of patients with pNET. We also highlight the relevant genomic biomarkers that predict response to specific treatments. Previously, germline testing was only recommended for high-risk patients with syndromic features (MEN1, VHL, TSC, and NF1), we review the evolving paradigm of germline testing in pNETs as recent studies have now shown that sporadic-appearing pNETs can also harbor germline variants.

Identification of a pathogenic variant and pre-implantation genetic testing for a Chinese family affected with split-hand/foot malformation.

Split-hand/foot malformation is a serious congenital limb malformation characterized by syndactyly and underdevelopment of the phalanges and metatarsals. In this study, we reported a case of a fetus with hand-foot cleft deformity. Whole exome and Sanger sequencing were used to filter out candidate gene mutation sites and provide pre-implantation genetic testing(PGT) for family members. Genetic testing results showed that there was a homozygous mutation c.786G>A (p.Trp262*) in the fetal WNT10B, and both parents were carriers of heterozygous mutations. PGT results showed that out of the two blastocysts, one was a heterozygous mutant and the other was a homozygous mutant. All the embryos had diploid chromosomes. The heterozygous embryo was transferred, and a singleton pregnancy was successfully achieved. This study suggests that homozygous mutations in WNT10B are the likely cause of hand-foot clefts in this family. For families with monogenic diseases, preimplantation genetic testing can effectively prevent the birth of an affected child only after identifying the pathogenic mutation.

A video intervention to improve patient understanding of tumor genomic testing in patients with cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Tumor genomic testing (TGT) is standard-of-care for most patients with advanced/metastatic cancer. Despite established guidelines, patient education prior to TGT is frequently omitted. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a concise 4 min video for patient education prior to TGT. METHODS: Based on a quality improvement cycle, an animated video was created to be applicable to any cancer type, incorporating culturally diverse images, available in English and Spanish. Patients undergoing standard-of-care TGT were enrolled at a tertiary academic institution and completed survey instruments prior to video viewing (T1) and immediately post-viewing (T2). Instruments included: (1) 10-question objective genomic knowledge; (2) 10-question video message-specific knowledge; (3) 11-question Trust in Provider; (4) attitudes regarding TGT. RESULTS: A total of 150 participants were enrolled. For the primary objective, there was a significant increase in video message-specific knowledge (median 10 point increase; p < 0.0001) with no significant change in genomic knowledge/understanding (p = 0.89) or trust in physician/provider (p = 0.59). Results for five questions significantly improved, including the likelihood of TGT impact on treatment decision, incidental germline findings, and cost of testing. Improvement in video message-specific knowledge was consistent across demographic groups, including age, income, and education. CONCLUSIONS: A concise, 3-4 min, broadly applicable video incorporating culturally diverse images administered prior to TGT significantly improved video message-specific knowledge across all demographic groups. This resource is publicly available at http://www.tumor-testing.com, with a goal to efficiently educate and empower patients regarding TGT while addressing guidelines within the flow of clinical practice.

Cascade testing in mitochondrial diseases: a cross-sectional retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Cascade testing can offer improved surveillance and timely introduction of clinical management for the at-risk biological relatives. Data on cascade testing and costs in mitochondrial diseases are lacking. To address this gap, we performed a cross-sectional retrospective study to provide a framework for cascade testing in mitochondrial diseases, to estimate the eligibility versus real-time uptake of cascade testing and to evaluate the cost of the genetic diagnosis of index cases and the cost of predictive cascade testing. METHODS: Data was collected through retrospective chart review. The variant inheritance pattern guided the identification of eligible first-degree relatives: (i) Males with mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) single nucleotide variants (SNVs) - siblings and mothers. (ii) Females with mtDNA SNVs - siblings, mothers and offspring. (iii) Autosomal Dominant (AD) nuclear DNA (nDNA) variants - siblings, offspring and both parents. (iv) Autosomal Recessive (AR) nDNA variants - siblings. RESULTS: We recruited 99 participants from the Adult Mitochondrial Disease Clinic in Sydney. The uptake of cascade testing was 55.2% in the mtDNA group, 55.8% in the AD nDNA group and 0% in AR nDNA group. Of the relatives in mtDNA group who underwent cascade testing, 65.4% were symptomatic, 20.5% were oligosymptomatic and 14.1% were asymptomatic. The mean cost of cascade testing for eligible first-degree relatives (mtDNA group: $694.7; AD nDNA group: $899.1) was lower than the corresponding index case (mtDNA group: $4578.4; AD nDNA group: $5715.1) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The demand for cascade testing in mitochondrial diseases varies according to the genotype and inheritance pattern. The real-time uptake of cascade testing can be influenced by multiple factors. Early diagnosis of at-risk biological relatives of index cases through cascade testing, confirms the diagnosis in those who are symptomatic and facilitates implementation of surveillance strategies and clinical care at an early stage of the disease.

High Diagnostic Yield and Clinical Utility of Next-Generation Sequencing in Children with Epilepsy and Neurodevelopmental Delays: A Retrospective Study.

Advances in genetics led to the identification of hundreds of epilepsy-related genes, some of which are treatable with etiology-specific interventions. However, the diagnostic yield of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in unexplained epilepsy is highly variable (10-50%). We sought to determine the diagnostic yield and clinical utility of NGS in children with unexplained epilepsy that is accompanied by neurodevelopmental delays and/or is medically intractable. A 5-year retrospective review was conducted at the American University of Beirut Medical Center to identify children who underwent whole exome sequencing (WES) or whole genome sequencing (WGS). Data on patient demographics, neurodevelopment, seizures, and treatments were collected. Forty-nine children underwent NGS with an overall diagnostic rate of 68.9% (27/38 for WES, and 4/7 for WGS). Most children (42) had neurodevelopmental delays with (18) or without (24) refractory epilepsy, and only three had refractory epilepsy without delays. The diagnostic yield was 77.8% in consanguineous families (18), and 61.5% in non-consanguineous families (26); consanguinity information was not available for one family. Genetic test results led to anti-seizure medication optimization or dietary therapies in six children, with subsequent improvements in seizure control and neurodevelopmental trajectories. Not only is the diagnostic rate of NGS high in children with unexplained epilepsy and neurodevelopmental delays, but also genetic testing in this population may often lead to potentially life-altering interventions.

Diagnostic Utility of Whole Genome Sequencing After Negative Karyotyping/Chromosomal Microarray in Infants Born With Multiple Congenital Anomalies.

BACKGROUND: Achieving a definitive genetic diagnosis of unexplained multiple congenital anomalies (MCAs) in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) infants is challenging because of the limited diagnostic capabilities of conventional genetic tests. Although the implementation of whole genome sequencing (WGS) has commenced for diagnosing MCAs, due to constraints in resources and faculty, many NICUs continue to utilize chromosomal microarray (CMA) and/or karyotyping as the initial diagnostic approach. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of WGS in infants with MCAs who have received negative results from karyotyping and/or CMA. METHODS: In this prospective study, we enrolled 80 infants with MCAs who were admitted to a NICU at a single center and had received negative results from CMA and/or karyotyping. The phenotypic characteristics were classified according to the International Classification of Diseases and the Human Phenotype Ontology. We assessed the diagnostic yield of trio-WGS in infants with normal chromosomal result and explored the process of diagnosing by analyzing both phenotype and genotype. Also, we compared the phenotype and clinical outcomes between the groups diagnosed with WGS and the undiagnosed group. RESULTS: The diagnostic yield of WGS was 26% (21/80), of which 76% were novel variants. There was a higher diagnostic yield in cases of craniofacial abnormalities, including those of the eye and ear, and a lower diagnostic yield in cases of gastrointestinal and genitourinary abnormalities. In addition, higher rates of rehabilitation therapy and gastrostomy were observed in WGS-diagnosed infants than in undiagnosed infants. CONCLUSION: This prospective cohort study assessed the usefulness of trio-WGS following chromosomal analysis for diagnosing MCAs in the NICU and revealed improvements in the diagnostic yield and clinical utility of WGS.

Perceptions of genomic newborn screening: a cross-sectional survey conducted with UK medical students.

BACKGROUND: With the potential to identify a vast number of rare diseases soon after birth, genomic newborn screening (gNBS) could facilitate earlier interventions and improve health outcomes. Designing a gNBS programme will involve balancing stakeholders' opinions and addressing concerns. The views of medical students-future clinicians who would deliver gNBS-have not yet been explored. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide online survey of UK medical students via the REDCap platform. Perceptions of gNBS, including scope of testing and potential benefits and drawbacks, were explored using a mix of multiple-choice questions, Likert scales, visual analogue scales and free-text questions. RESULTS: In total, 116 medical students across 16 universities participated. Overall, 45% supported gNBS, with a positively skewed mean support score of 3.24 (SD 1.26, range: 1.0-5.0), and 55% felt it relevant to their future practice. Almost all agreed that infant-onset and childhood-onset diseases and conditions with effective treatments should be included. Most felt that earlier interventions and personalised care would be the most important benefit of gNBS. Other perceived benefits included earlier diagnoses, diagnosing more patients and enabling research for new treatments. However, several perceived challenges were highlighted: risk of genomic discrimination, incidental or uncertain findings, data security and breaching children's future autonomy. Students expressed conflicting opinions on the psychological impact on families, but most were concerned about a lack of support due to current resource limitations in health services. Students frequently reported having insufficient knowledge to form an opinion, which may reflect gaps in genomics education at medical school and the current lack of evidence base for gNBS. CONCLUSION: Although some support for gNBS was demonstrated, ethicolegal and social challenges were raised, emphasising a need for ongoing discussions about the implications of gNBS.