Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 4.428
Filter
1.
Respir Res ; 25(1): 262, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38951782

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) are common following lung transplantation (LuTx), yet their role in graft damage is inconclusive. Mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) is the main read-out of DSA diagnostics; however its value is often disregarded when analyzing unwanted post-transplant outcomes such as graft loss or chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Here we aim to evaluate an MFI stratification method in these outcomes. METHODS: A cohort of 87 LuTx recipients has been analyzed, in which a cutoff of 8000 MFI has been determined for high MFI based on clinically relevant data. Accordingly, recipients were divided into DSA-negative, DSA-low and DSA-high subgroups. Both graft survival and CLAD-free survival were evaluated. Among factors that may contribute to DSA development we analyzed Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) infection in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) specimens. RESULTS: High MFI DSAs contributed to clinical antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and were associated with significantly worse graft (HR: 5.77, p < 0.0001) and CLAD-free survival (HR: 6.47, p = 0.019) compared to low or negative MFI DSA levels. Analysis of BAL specimens revealed a strong correlation between DSA status, P. aeruginosa infection and BAL neutrophilia. DSA-high status and clinical AMR were both independent prognosticators for decreased graft and CLAD-free survival in our multivariate Cox-regression models, whereas BAL neutrophilia was associated with worse graft survival. CONCLUSIONS: P. aeruginosa infection rates are elevated in recipients with a strong DSA response. Our results indicate that the simultaneous interpretation of MFI values and BAL neutrophilia is a feasible approach for risk evaluation and may help clinicians when to initiate DSA desensitization therapy, as early intervention could improve prognosis.


Subject(s)
Graft Rejection , Lung Transplantation , Pseudomonas Infections , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Lung Transplantation/adverse effects , Lung Transplantation/mortality , Humans , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Pseudomonas Infections/immunology , Pseudomonas Infections/diagnosis , Pseudomonas Infections/mortality , Adult , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/immunology , Graft Rejection/immunology , Graft Rejection/diagnosis , Tissue Donors , Retrospective Studies , Graft Survival , Cohort Studies , Isoantibodies/blood , Aged
2.
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban ; 49(3): 417-425, 2024 Mar 28.
Article in English, Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38970516

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Rejection remains the most important factor limiting the survival of transplanted kidneys. Although a pathological biopsy of the transplanted kidney is the gold standard for diagnosing rejection, its limitations prevent it from being used as a routine monitoring method. Recently, peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulation testing has become an important means of assessing the body's immune system, however, its application value and strategy in the field of kidney transplantation need further exploration. Additionally, the development and utilization of routine test parameters are also important methods for exploring diagnostic strategies and predictive models for kidney transplant diseases. This study aims to explore the correlation between peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations and T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), as well as their diagnostic value, in conjunction with routine blood tests. METHODS: A total of 154 kidney transplant recipients, who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were treated at the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from January to December, 2021, were selected as the study subjects. They were assigned into a stable group, a TCMR group, and an ABMR group, based on the occurrence and type of rejection. The basic and clinical data of these recipients were retrospectively analyzed and compared among the 3 groups. The transplant kidney function, routine blood tests, and peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulation data of the TCMR group and the ABMR group before rejection treatment were compared with those of the stable group. RESULTS: The stable, TCMR group, and ABMR group showed no statistically significant differences in immunosuppressive maintenance regimens or sources of transplanted kidneys (all P>0.05). However, the post-transplant duration was significantly longer in the ABMR group compared with the stable group (P<0.001) and the TCMR group (P<0.05). Regarding kidney function, serum creatinine levels in the ABMR group were higher than in the stable group and the TCMR group (both P<0.01), with the TCMR group also showing higher levels than the stable group (P<0.01). Both TCMR and ABMR groups had significantly higher blood urea nitrogen levels than the stable group (P<0.01), with no statistically significant difference between TCMR and ABMR groups (P>0.05). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was lower in both TCMR and ABMR groups compared with the stable group (both P<0.01). In routine blood tests, the ABMR group had lower hemoglobin, red blood cell count, and platelet count than the stable group (all P<0.05). The TCMR group had higher neutrophil percentage (P<0.05) and count (P<0.05) than the stable group, and the ABMR group had a higher neutrophil percentage than the stable group (P<0.05). The eosinophil percentage and count in the TCMR group were lower than in the stable and ABMR groups (all P<0.05). Both TCMR and ABMR groups had lower basophil percentage and count, as well as lower lymphocyte percentage and count, compared with the stable group (all P<0.05). There were no significant differences in monocyte percentage and count among the 3 groups (all P>0.05). In lymphocyte subpopulations, the TCMR and ABMR groups had lower counts of CD45+ cells and T cells compared with the stable group (all P<0.05). The TCMR group also had lower counts of CD4+ T cells, NK cells, and B cells than the stable group (all P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the T cell percentage, CD4+ T cell percentage, CD8+ T cell percentage and their counts, CD4+/CD8+ T cell ratio, NK cell percentage, and B cell percentage among the stable, TCMR, and ABMR groups (all P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of rejection leads to impaired transplant kidney function, accompanied by characteristic changes in some parameters of routine blood tests and peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations in kidney transplant recipients. The different characteristics of changes in some parameters of routine blood tests and peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations during TCMR and ABMR may help predict and diagnose rejection and differentiate between TCMR and ABMR.


Subject(s)
Graft Rejection , Kidney Transplantation , Humans , Graft Rejection/blood , Graft Rejection/diagnosis , Graft Rejection/immunology , Retrospective Studies , Female , Male , Lymphocyte Subsets/immunology , Adult , Middle Aged , T-Lymphocytes/immunology
3.
Clin Transplant ; 38(6): e15368, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39031705

ABSTRACT

Describing risk factors and outcomes in kidney transplant recipients with oxalate nephropathy (ON) may help elucidate the pathogenesis and guide treatment strategies. We used a large single-center database to identify patients with ON and categorized them into delayed graft function with ON (DGF-ON) and late ON. Incidence density sampling was used to select controls. A total of 37 ON cases were diagnosed between 1/2011 and 1/2021. DGF-ON (n = 13) was diagnosed in 1.05% of the DGF population. Pancreatic atrophy on imaging (36.4% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.002) and gastric bypass history (7.7% vs. 0%; p = 0.06) were more common in DGF-ON than with controls with DGF requiring biopsy but without evidence of ON. DGF-ON was not associated with worse graft survival (p = 0.98) or death-censored graft survival (p = 0.48). Late ON (n = 24) was diagnosed after a mean of 78.2 months. Late ON patients were older (mean age 55.1 vs. 48.4 years; p = 0.02), more likely to be women (61.7% vs. 37.5%; p = 0.03), have gastric bypass history (8.3% vs. 0.8%; p = 0.02) and pancreatic atrophy on imaging (38.9% vs. 13.3%; p = 0.02). Late ON was associated with an increased risk of graft failure (HR 2.0; p = 0.07) and death-censored graft loss (HR 2.5; p = 0.10). We describe two phenotypes of ON after kidney transplantation: DGF-ON and late ON. Our study is the first to our knowledge to evaluate DGF-ON with DGF controls without ON. Although limited by small sample size, DGF-ON was not associated with adverse outcomes when compared with controls. Late ON predicted worse allograft outcomes.


Subject(s)
Graft Survival , Kidney Transplantation , Phenotype , Postoperative Complications , Humans , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Prognosis , Follow-Up Studies , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Delayed Graft Function/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Oxalates/metabolism , Kidney Function Tests , Kidney Diseases/etiology , Kidney Diseases/surgery , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Graft Rejection/etiology , Graft Rejection/diagnosis , Graft Rejection/pathology , Survival Rate
4.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1433918, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39044817

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical validity of donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) in comparison with that of donor specific anti-HLA antibody (DSA) for predicting biopsy-proven rejection (BPR)and severe microvascular inflammation (severe MVI) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Methods: In this prospective observational investigation, 64 KTRs who underwent the indicated biopsies were included. Blood samples collected prior to biopsy were tested for dd-cfDNA and DSA. Biopsy specimens were classified by a renal pathologist according to the Banff classification. The predictive performance of dd-cfDNA and DSA for histological allograft diagnosis was assessed. Results: KTRs were categorized into the high and low dd-cfDNA groups based on a level of 0.4%. Eighteen patients (28.1%) had positive DSA at biopsy, exhibiting higher dd-cfDNA levels than the DSA-negative patients. BPR and severe MVI incidences were elevated in the high dd-cfDNA group (BPR: 42.9% vs. 3.4%, P <0.001; severe MVI: 37.1% vs. 3.4%, P = 0.001). Also, elevated glomerulitis and MVI scores were observed in the high dd-cfDNA group. DSA showed the highest predictive value for BPR (AUC = 0.880), whereas dd-cfDNA alone excelled in predicting severe MVI (AUC = 0.855). Combination of DSA and dd-cfDNA (>0.4%) yielded sensitivities of 80.0% and 50.0% with specificities of 90.7% and 88.0% for antibody-mediated rejection and severe MVI detection, respectively. Conclusion: The dd-cfDNA test is a predictive tool for BPR and severe MVI, and it can improve the performance, especially when combined with DSA for BPR.


Subject(s)
Cell-Free Nucleic Acids , Graft Rejection , Kidney Transplantation , Tissue Donors , Humans , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Graft Rejection/immunology , Graft Rejection/diagnosis , Graft Rejection/blood , Cell-Free Nucleic Acids/blood , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Prospective Studies , Isoantibodies/blood , Isoantibodies/immunology , Biopsy , Biomarkers/blood , HLA Antigens/immunology , HLA Antigens/genetics , Microvessels/pathology , Microvessels/immunology , Inflammation/immunology , Allografts/immunology
5.
Clin Transplant ; 38(7): e15416, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39058520

ABSTRACT

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a leading cause of death after heart transplantation (HT). We evaluated donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) as a noninvasive biomarker of CAV development after HT. The INSPIRE registry at the Intermountain Medical Center was queried for stored plasma samples from HT patients with and without CAV. At Stanford University, HT patients with CAV (cases) and without CAV (controls) were enrolled prospectively, and blood samples were collected. All the samples were analyzed for dd-cfDNA using the AlloSure assay (CareDx, Inc.). CAV was defined per the ISHLT 2010 standardized classification system. Univariate associations between patient demographics and clinical characteristics and their CAV grade were tested using chi-square and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Associations between their dd-cfDNA levels and CAV grades were examined using a nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test. A total of 69 pts were included, and 101 samples were analyzed for dd-cfDNA. The mean age at sample collection was 58.6 ± 13.7 years; 66.7% of the patients were male, and 81% were White. CAV 0, 1, 2, and 3 were present in 37.6%, 22.8%, 22.8%, and 16.8% of included samples, respectively. The median dd-cfDNA level was 0.13% (0.06, 0.33). The median dd-cfDNA level was not significantly different between CAV (-) and CAV (+): 0.09% (0.05%-0.32%) and 0.15% (0.07%-0.33%), respectively, p = 0.25 and with similar results across all CAV grades. In our study, dd-cfDNA levels did not correlate with the presence of CAV and did not differ across CAV grades. As such, dd-cfDNA does not appear to be a reliable noninvasive biomarker for CAV surveillance.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers , Cell-Free Nucleic Acids , Heart Transplantation , Tissue Donors , Humans , Male , Female , Heart Transplantation/adverse effects , Cell-Free Nucleic Acids/blood , Middle Aged , Follow-Up Studies , Prospective Studies , Biomarkers/blood , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Allografts , Postoperative Complications/blood , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Case-Control Studies , Graft Rejection/etiology , Graft Rejection/diagnosis , Graft Rejection/blood , Graft Survival , Vascular Diseases/etiology , Vascular Diseases/blood , Adult
6.
Transpl Int ; 37: 12445, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38962472

ABSTRACT

While allograft rejection (AR) continues to threaten the success of cardiothoracic transplantation, lack of accurate and repeatable surveillance tools to diagnose AR is a major unmet need in the clinical management of cardiothoracic transplant recipients. Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) and transbronchial biopsy (TBBx) have been the cornerstone of rejection monitoring since the field's incipience, but both suffer from significant limitations, including poor concordance of biopsy interpretation among pathologists. In recent years, novel molecular tools for AR monitoring have emerged and their performance characteristics have been evaluated in multiple studies. An international working group convened by ESOT has reviewed the existing literature and provides a series of recommendations to guide the use of these biomarkers in clinical practice. While acknowledging some caveats, the group recognized that Gene-expression profiling and donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) may be used to rule out rejection in heart transplant recipients, but they are not recommended for cardiac allograft vasculopathy screening. Other traditional biomarkers (NT-proBNP, BNP or troponin) do not have sufficient evidence to support their use to diagnose AR. Regarding lung transplant, dd-cfDNA could be used to rule out clinical rejection and infection, but its use to monitor treatment response is not recommended.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers , Graft Rejection , Heart Transplantation , Lung Transplantation , Humans , Biomarkers/blood , Biopsy , Cell-Free Nucleic Acids/blood , Consensus , Europe , Gene Expression Profiling , Graft Rejection/diagnosis , Lung Transplantation/adverse effects , Societies, Medical
7.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38972753

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This meta-analysis aimed to examine the prognosis of patients with acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease (AE-ILD) treated with lung transplantation compared to those with stable interstitial lung disease (ILD). METHODS: We conducted a detailed search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, with the primary outcomes being overall survival (OS), acute cellular rejection (ACR), primary graft dysfunction (PGD), and length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: Five cohort studies were included in this meta-analysis, with 183 patients enrolled in the AE-ILD group and 337 patients in the stable-ILD group. The results showed that in regard to perioperative outcomes, the AE-ILD group did not differ from the stable-ILD group in the incidence of ACR (relative risks [RR] = 0.34, p = 0.44) and the incidence of PGD Ⅲ (RR = 0.53, p = 0.43), but had a longer LOS (mean difference = 9.15, p = 0.02). Regarding prognosis, the two also did not differ in 90-day OS (RR = 0.97, p = 0.59), 1-year OS (RR = 1.05, p = 0.66), and 3-year OS (RR = 0.91, p = 0.76). CONCLUSION: Our study concluded that the efficacy of lung transplantation in patients with AE-ILD is not inferior to that of patients with stable ILD. Lung transplantation is one of the potential treatments for patients with AE-ILD.


Subject(s)
Disease Progression , Graft Rejection , Length of Stay , Lung Diseases, Interstitial , Lung Transplantation , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Graft Rejection/mortality , Graft Rejection/diagnosis , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/mortality , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/surgery , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/diagnosis , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/physiopathology , Lung Transplantation/mortality , Lung Transplantation/adverse effects , Primary Graft Dysfunction/mortality , Primary Graft Dysfunction/diagnosis , Primary Graft Dysfunction/etiology , Primary Graft Dysfunction/physiopathology , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
8.
Exp Clin Transplant ; 22(5): 366-372, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38970279

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The recurrence of underlying diseases remains a major cause of graft failure after liver transplant. This study aimed to identify factors associated with the recurrence of underlying diseases and investigate the incidence of these factors and recurrence at the main liver transplant center in Iran. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included adult liver transplant recipients followed at Shiraz Transplant Center between 2011 and 2018 with a confirmed diagnosis of recurrence of underlying disease in our study. We reviewed medical records and extracted data on demographic characteristics, clinical and paraclinical features, medication use, and current status. We used a systematic random sampling method to select a control group of 95 transplant recipients who did not have recurrence. Of 3022 total transplant recipients, 76 recipients experienced a recurrence of their underlying disease. RESULTS: Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, underlying disease, recipient blood group, donor sex, donor blood group, and rejection frequency were significantly different between study groups with and without recurrence of underlying diseases. Liver transplant recipients with recurrence had lower mean Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score. Recipients with recurrence also had higher rate of drug consumption (eg, prednisolone, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, sirolimus). Regression analysis showed that donor sex and rejection frequency had an effect on disease recurrence. Death occurred more frequently in liver transplant recipients with recurrence than in the control group (39.5% vs 26.3%), butthe difference was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Donor sex and acute rejection frequency are independent factors predictive of the recurrence of underlying disease. Modifying risk factors can help minimize the recurrence of underlying diseases after liver transplant.


Subject(s)
Immunosuppressive Agents , Liver Transplantation , Recurrence , Humans , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Female , Male , Risk Factors , Iran/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Adult , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Risk Assessment , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Graft Rejection/prevention & control , Graft Rejection/immunology , Graft Rejection/epidemiology , Graft Rejection/diagnosis , Graft Rejection/mortality , Incidence , End Stage Liver Disease/surgery , End Stage Liver Disease/diagnosis , End Stage Liver Disease/mortality , Graft Survival
9.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1438247, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39034991

ABSTRACT

Background: Diagnosis of kidney transplant rejection currently relies on manual histopathological assessment, which is subjective and susceptible to inter-observer variability, leading to limited reproducibility. We aim to develop a deep learning system for automated assessment of whole-slide images (WSIs) from kidney allograft biopsies to enable detection and subtyping of rejection and to predict the prognosis of rejection. Method: We collected H&E-stained WSIs of kidney allograft biopsies at 400x magnification from January 2015 to September 2023 at two hospitals. These biopsy specimens were classified as T cell-mediated rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, and other lesions based on the consensus reached by two experienced transplant pathologists. To achieve feature extraction, feature aggregation, and global classification, we employed multi-instance learning and common convolution neural networks (CNNs). The performance of the developed models was evaluated using various metrics, including confusion matrix, receiver operating characteristic curves, the area under the curve (AUC), classification map, heat map, and pathologist-machine confrontations. Results: In total, 906 WSIs from 302 kidney allograft biopsies were included for analysis. The model based on multi-instance learning enables detection and subtyping of rejection, named renal rejection artificial intelligence model (RRAIM), with the overall 3-category AUC of 0.798 in the independent test set, which is superior to that of three transplant pathologists under nearly routine assessment conditions. Moreover, the prognosis models accurately predicted graft loss within 1 year following rejection and treatment response for rejection, achieving AUC of 0.936 and 0.756, respectively. Conclusion: We first developed deep-learning models utilizing multi-instance learning for the detection and subtyping of rejection and prediction of rejection prognosis in kidney allograft biopsies. These models performed well and may be useful in assisting the pathological diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Deep Learning , Graft Rejection , Kidney Transplantation , Humans , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Graft Rejection/pathology , Graft Rejection/immunology , Graft Rejection/diagnosis , Biopsy , Male , Female , Allografts/pathology , Adult , Middle Aged , Kidney/pathology , Kidney/immunology , Reproducibility of Results
10.
Transpl Immunol ; 85: 102082, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39002808

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There seems to be a close link between the changing levels of selenoproteins, which are important for maintaining redox homeostasis in the body, and acute rejection of kidney transplants. The aim of this study was to explore the diagnostic value of selenoprotein change characteristics in renal tissues for acute rejection of kidney transplantation. METHODS: We first explored the potential biological functions of 25 selenoproteins in the human body by enrichment analysis and used the HPA database to clarify the expression levels of selenoproteins in kidney tissues; We then constructed a diagnostic model using "Logistic regression analysis" and "Nomogram model"; Calibration curves and ROC curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic models, and clinical decision curves (DCA) were used to assess the diagnostic value of selenoprotein changes to the clinic; Single-gene GSEA enrichment analysis to further explore the potential regulatory mechanisms of selenoproteins; The Cibersort algorithm explores the level of immune cell infiltration and uses correlation analysis to clarify the correlation between selenoproteins and immune cells; We further assessed the diagnostic value of selenoproteins in kidney transplantation ABMR and TCMR, respectively. Finally, we validated the expression level of selenoproteins in kidney tissues by constructing a rat model of acute rejection of kidney transplantation using transcriptome sequencing. RESULTS: Our enrichment analysis revealed that selenoproteins are mainly closely associated with biological functions such as oxidative stress, inflammation, and immune regulation (P<0.05); The HPA database suggests that a total of 23 selenoproteins can be expressed in kidney tissue. We constructed a diagnostic model using these 23 selenoproteins, and both calibration curves and ROC curves proved that their change levels have good diagnostic value for acute rejection of kidney transplantation, and DCA curves proved the role of selenoproteins in clinical decision-making; Single-gene GSEA enrichment analysis revealed that selenoproteins are closely associated with immune regulation-related pathways (P<0.05); The Cibersort algorithm identified 10 immune cell infiltration levels that were significantly altered during acute rejection of kidney transplantation (P<0.05), while correlation analyses indicated that selenoproteins correlate with multiple immune cell infiltrations; In ABMR and TCMR, we again verified the diagnostic value of selenoprotein changes in acute rejection of kidney transplantation. Finally, we found significant differences in the expression levels of nine selenoproteins in a rat model of acute rejection of kidney transplantation (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Changes in selenoproteins in renal tissues have good diagnostic value for acute rejection of kidneyl transplantation, and selenoproteins may be able to be a potential target for alleviating acute rejection of kidney transplantation.


Subject(s)
Graft Rejection , Kidney Transplantation , Kidney , Selenoproteins , Transcriptome , Animals , Graft Rejection/diagnosis , Graft Rejection/immunology , Graft Rejection/genetics , Selenoproteins/genetics , Selenoproteins/metabolism , Rats , Humans , Kidney/pathology , Kidney/metabolism , Kidney/immunology , Male , Gene Expression Profiling , Disease Models, Animal
11.
Clin Transplant ; 38(7): e15410, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39033507

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Microvascular inflammation (MVI) can occur in biopsies showing T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR), but it is not well established that T-cells can directly mediate microvascular injury (TCMR-MVI). METHODS: This was a cross sectional RNAseq based Banff Human Organ Transplant (BHOT) gene expression (GE) analysis. The objective of this study was to probe the molecular signature of TCMR-MVI in comparison with C4d+, DSA+ antibody mediated rejection (ABMR), stable renal function (STA), and TCMR without MVI. Transcriptome analysis utilized CLC genomic workbench and R-studio software. RESULTS: No gene set was specific for any diagnostic category, and all were expressed at low levels in STA biopsies. BHOT gene set scores could differentiate ABMR from TCMR and TCMR-MVI, but not TCMR from TCMR-MVI. TCMR-MVI underexpressed several genes associated with ABMR including DSATs, ENDAT, immunoglobulin genes, ADAMDEC1, PECAM1 and NK cell transcripts (MYBL1, GNLY), but overexpressed C3, NKBBIZ, and LTF. On the other hand, there was no significant difference in the expression of these genes in TCMR-MVI versus TCMR. This indicates that the GE profile of TCMR MVI aligns more closely with TCMR than ABMR. The limitations of classifying biopsies using the binary ABMR-TCMR algorithm, and the occurrence of common pathogenesis mechanisms amongst different rejection phenotype was highlighted by the frequent presence of molecular mixed rejection. CONCLUSIONS: T-cell mediated mechanisms play a significant role in the pathogenesis of MVI. GE was broadly different between rejection phenotypes, but molecular scores varied substantially between biopsies with the same Banff grade. It was not always possible to achieve precise molecular score-based diagnostic categorization of individual patients.


Subject(s)
Graft Rejection , Kidney Transplantation , T-Lymphocytes , Humans , Graft Rejection/etiology , Graft Rejection/pathology , Graft Rejection/diagnosis , Graft Rejection/immunology , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Cross-Sectional Studies , Male , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , T-Lymphocytes/metabolism , Female , Graft Survival/immunology , Inflammation/pathology , Follow-Up Studies , Middle Aged , Microvessels/pathology , Prognosis , Biomarkers/metabolism , Biomarkers/analysis , Allografts , Adult , Gene Expression Profiling , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Risk Factors , Kidney Function Tests
12.
Biosens Bioelectron ; 261: 116523, 2024 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38924813

ABSTRACT

The quest to reduce kidney transplant rejection has emphasized the urgent requirement for the development of non-invasive, precise diagnostic technologies. These technologies aim to detect antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), which are asymptomatic and pose a risk of potential kidney damage. The protocols for managing rejection caused by ABMR and TCMR differ, and diagnosis has traditionally relied on invasive biopsy procedures. Therefore, a convergence system using a nano-sensing chip, Raman spectroscopy, and AI technology was introduced to facilitate diagnosis using serum samples obtained from patients with no major abnormality, ABMR, and TCMR after kidney transplantation. Tissue biopsy and Banff score analysis were performed across the groups for validation, and 5 µL of serum obtained at the same time was added onto the Au-ZnO nanorod-based Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering sensing chip to obtain Raman spectroscopy signals. The accuracy of machine learning algorithms for principal component-linear discriminant analysis and principal component-partial least squares discriminant analysis was 93.53% and 98.82%, respectively. The collagen (an indicative of kidney injury), creatinine, and amino acid-derived signals (markers of kidney function) contributed to this accuracy; however, the high accuracy was primarily due to the ability of the system to analyze a broad spectrum of various biomarkers.


Subject(s)
Graft Rejection , Kidney Transplantation , Machine Learning , Spectrum Analysis, Raman , Humans , Spectrum Analysis, Raman/methods , Graft Rejection/blood , Graft Rejection/diagnosis , Graft Rejection/classification , Biosensing Techniques/methods , Nanotubes/chemistry , Male , Gold/chemistry , Biomarkers/blood , Middle Aged , Female , Adult
13.
Transpl Immunol ; 85: 102073, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38889844

ABSTRACT

Until now, the ability to predict or retard immune-mediated rejection events after lung transplantation is still limited due to the lack of specific biomarkers. The pressing need remains to early diagnose or predict the onset of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) and its differential phenotypes that is the leading cause of death. Omics technologies (mainly genomics, epigenomics, and transcriptomics) combined with advanced bioinformatic platforms are clarifying the key immune-related molecular routes that trigger early and late events of lung allograft rejection supporting the biomarker discovery. The most promising biomarkers came from genomics. Both unregistered and NIH-registered clinical trials demonstrated that the increased percentage of donor-derived cell-free DNA in both plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid showed a good diagnostic performance for clinically silent acute rejection events and CLAD differential phenotypes. A further success arose from transcriptomics that led to development of Molecular Microscope® Diagnostic System (MMDx) to interpret the relationship between molecular signatures of lung biopsies and rejection events. Other immune-related biomarkers of rejection events may be exosomes, telomer length, DNA methylation, and histone-mediated neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) but none of them entered in registered clinical trials. Here, we discuss novel and existing technologies for revealing new immune-mediated mechanisms underlying acute and chronic rejection events, with a particular focus on emerging biomarkers for improving precision medicine of lung transplantation field.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers , Graft Rejection , Lung Transplantation , Humans , Graft Rejection/diagnosis , Graft Rejection/immunology , Precision Medicine , Animals , Genomics/methods
14.
Pediatr Transplant ; 28(4): e14757, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38695266

ABSTRACT

Pediatric lung transplantation represents a treatment option for children with advanced lung disease or pulmonary vascular disorders who are deemed an appropriate candidate. Pediatric flexible bronchoscopy is an important and evolving field that is highly relevant in the pediatric lung transplant population. It is thus important to advance our knowledge to better understand how care for children after lung transplant can be maximally optimized using pediatric bronchoscopy. Our goals are to continually improve procedural skills when performing bronchoscopy and to decrease the complication rate while acquiring adequate samples for diagnostic evaluation. Attainment of these goals is critical since allograft assessment by bronchoscopic biopsy is required for histological diagnosis of acute cellular rejection and is an important contributor to establishing chronic lung allograft dysfunction, a common complication after lung transplant. Flexible bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage and transbronchial lung biopsy plays a key role in lung transplant graft assessment. In this article, we discuss the application of bronchoscopy in pediatric lung transplant evaluation including historical approaches, our experience, and future directions not only in bronchoscopy but also in the evolving pediatric lung transplantation field. Pediatric flexible bronchoscopy has become a vital modality for diagnosing lung transplant complications in children as well as assessing therapeutic responses. Herein, we review the value of flexible bronchoscopy in the management of children after lung transplant and discuss the application of novel techniques to improve care for this complex pediatric patient population and we provide a brief update about new diagnostic techniques applied in the growing lung transplantation field.


Subject(s)
Bronchoscopy , Graft Rejection , Lung Transplantation , Humans , Lung Transplantation/methods , Bronchoscopy/methods , Child , Graft Rejection/diagnosis , Biopsy/methods , Bronchoalveolar Lavage/methods , Lung , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Lung Diseases/diagnosis , Lung Diseases/surgery
15.
Life Sci ; 348: 122698, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38710278

ABSTRACT

Kidney transplantation is the preferred treatment for pediatric end-stage renal disease. However, pediatric recipients face unique challenges due to their prolonged need for kidney function to accommodate growth and development. The continual changes in the immune microenvironment during childhood development and the heightened risk of complications from long-term use of immunosuppressive drugs. The overwhelming majority of children may require more than one kidney transplant in their lifetime. Acute rejection (AR) stands as the primary cause of kidney transplant failure in children. While pathologic biopsy remains the "gold standard" for diagnosing renal rejection, its invasive nature raises concerns regarding potential functional impairment and the psychological impact on children due to repeated procedures. In this review, we outline the current research status of novel biomarkers associated with AR in urine and blood after pediatric kidney transplantation. These biomarkers exhibit superior diagnostic and prognostic performance compared to conventional ones, with the added advantages of being less invasive and highly reproducible for long-term graft monitoring. We also integrate the limitations of these novel biomarkers and propose a refined monitoring model to optimize the management of AR in pediatric kidney transplantation.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers , Graft Rejection , Kidney Transplantation , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Humans , Graft Rejection/diagnosis , Biomarkers/urine , Child , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Acute Disease
16.
HLA ; 103(5): e15518, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38733247

ABSTRACT

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) has been widely studied as biomarker for non-invasive allograft rejection monitoring. Earlier rejection detection enables more prompt diagnosis and intervention, ultimately improving patient treatment and outcomes. This multi-centre study aims to verify analytical performance of a next-generation sequencing-based dd-cfDNA assay at end-user environments. Three independent laboratories received the same experimental design and 16 blinded samples to perform cfDNA extraction and the dd-cfDNA assay workflow. dd-cfDNA results were compared between sites and against manufacturer validation to evaluate concordance, reproducibility, repeatability and verify analytical performance. A total of 247 sample libraries were generated across 18 runs, with completion time of <24 h. A 96.0% first pass rate highlighted minimal failures. Overall observed versus expected dd-cfDNA results demonstrated good concordance and a strong positive correlation with linear least squares regression r2 = 0.9989, and high repeatability and reproducibility within and between sites, respectively (p > 0.05). Manufacturer validation established limit of blank 0.18%, limit of detection 0.23% and limit of quantification 0.23%, and results from independent sites verified those limits. Parallel analyses illustrated no significant difference (p = 0.951) between dd-cfDNA results with or without recipient genotype. The dd-cfDNA assay evaluated here has been verified as a reliable method for efficient, reproducible dd-cfDNA quantification in plasma from solid organ transplant recipients without requiring genotyping. Implementation of onsite dd-cfDNA testing at clinical laboratories could facilitate earlier detection of allograft injury, bearing great potential for patient care.


Subject(s)
Cell-Free Nucleic Acids , Graft Rejection , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Organ Transplantation , Tissue Donors , Transplant Recipients , Humans , Cell-Free Nucleic Acids/blood , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Graft Rejection/diagnosis , Graft Rejection/blood , Graft Rejection/genetics , Biomarkers/blood
18.
Clin Sci (Lond) ; 138(11): 663-685, 2024 Jun 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38819301

ABSTRACT

There is a major unmet need for improved accuracy and precision in the assessment of transplant rejection and tissue injury. Diagnoses relying on histologic and visual assessments demonstrate significant variation between expert observers (as represented by low kappa values) and have limited ability to assess many biological processes that produce little histologic changes, for example, acute injury. Consensus rules and guidelines for histologic diagnosis are useful but may have errors. Risks of over- or under-treatment can be serious: many therapies for transplant rejection or primary diseases are expensive and carry risk for significant adverse effects. Improved diagnostic methods could alleviate healthcare costs by reducing treatment errors, increase treatment efficacy, and serve as useful endpoints for clinical trials of new agents that can improve outcomes. Molecular diagnostic assessments using microarrays combined with machine learning algorithms for interpretation have shown promise for increasing diagnostic precision via probabilistic assessments, recalibrating standard of care diagnostic methods, clarifying ambiguous cases, and identifying potentially missed cases of rejection. This review describes the development and application of the Molecular Microscope® Diagnostic System (MMDx), and discusses the history and reasoning behind many common methods, statistical practices, and computational decisions employed to ensure that MMDx scores are as accurate and precise as possible. MMDx provides insights on disease processes and highly reproducible results from a comparatively small amount of tissue and constitutes a general approach that is useful in many areas of medicine, including kidney, heart, lung, and liver transplants, with the possibility of extrapolating lessons for understanding native organ disease states.


Subject(s)
Graft Rejection , Organ Transplantation , Humans , Graft Rejection/diagnosis , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis , Gene Expression Profiling/methods , Precision Medicine/methods , Machine Learning , Reproducibility of Results
19.
Transpl Immunol ; 84: 102055, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38744349

ABSTRACT

Respiratory complications following allogeneic HSCT can lead to severe morbidity and mortality. Lung transplantation (LT) is a potential treatment for select patients with late-onset non-infectious pulmonary complications post-HSCT. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a noninvasive biomarker for monitoring the health of allografts following LT. However, its utility in a multi-genome setting of LT after HSCT has not yet been clinically validated. Here we describe a case of a 75-year-old, male patient who underwent single-lung transplantation for BOS related to chronic GVHD and presented with persistently elevated dd-cfDNA levels. In a surveillance biopsy, the patient was diagnosed with mild acute cellular rejection at three months. The patient's lung function remained stable, and the reported dd-cfDNA levels decreased after the rejection episode but remained elevated above levels that would be considered quiescent for LT alone. In this unique setting, as 3 different genomes contributed to the dd-cfDNA% reported value, valuable insight was obtained by performing further analysis to separate the specific SNPs to identify the contribution of recipient, lung-donor, and HSCT-donor cfDNA. This study highlights the potential utility of dd-cfDNA in the multi-genome setting of lung transplant post-HSCT, nuances that need to be considered while interpreting the results, and its value in monitoring lung rejection.


Subject(s)
Cell-Free Nucleic Acids , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Lung Transplantation , Tissue Donors , Humans , Male , Cell-Free Nucleic Acids/blood , Aged , Graft Rejection/diagnosis , Graft vs Host Disease/diagnosis , Transplantation, Homologous , Biomarkers/blood , Bronchiolitis Obliterans/diagnosis , Bronchiolitis Obliterans/etiology , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
20.
Transpl Immunol ; 84: 102054, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38750972

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Immune-mediated rejection is the most common cause of allograft failure in kidney transplant (KT) patients. Exposure to alloantigen, including human leukocyte antigen (HLA), results in the production of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). There are limited data about low levels of mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) DSA, especially post-transplantation. This study evaluated allograft outcomes in KT patients with low MFI DSA. METHODS: From January 2007 to December 2021, KT patients who were tested for post-transplant DSA at Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand, with the DSA MFI ≤ 1000 were evaluated. These KT patients were categorized into two groups: very low DSA (VLL; MFI = 1-500) and low DSA (LL; MFI = 501-1000). All KT patients were evaluated for the primary outcomes, such as the incidence of acute rejection, serum creatinine levels at one and five years after transplantation as well as allograft and patient survivals. RESULTS: Among 36 KT patients 25 were included as those with VLL and 11 as those with LL. The LL group had significantly higher T-cell mediated allograft rejection (TCMR) than the VLL group (45% vs. 12%, P = 0.04). In addition, 10 patients, 5 in the VLL group and 5 in the LL group developed antibody-mediated allograft rejection (ABMR). Both TCMR and ABMR were confirmed by biopsy results. There was a trend toward higher MFI in KT patients with ABMR than without ABMR (P = 0.22). At 5 post-transplant years, serum creatinine, allograft and patient survivals were comparable between these two groups. Furthermore, the univariate and multivariate analyzes revealed that the LL group was a high risk for rejection. CONCLUSION: Low MFI DSA values after transplantation may be associated with a higher incidence of rejection, but this finding did not show differences in allograft and patient survival in this study's analysis.


Subject(s)
Graft Rejection , Graft Survival , HLA Antigens , Isoantibodies , Kidney Transplantation , Tissue Donors , Humans , Graft Rejection/immunology , Graft Rejection/diagnosis , Male , Female , Isoantibodies/blood , Middle Aged , Adult , HLA Antigens/immunology , Graft Survival/immunology , Allografts/immunology , Transplantation, Homologous , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL