Changes in Numbers of Glomerular Macrophages Between Two Consecutive Biopsies and the Association With Renal Transplant Graft Survival.

BACKGROUND: Macrophages are involved in kidney transplants. The aim of the study was to investigate if changes exist in the levels of glomerular macrophage index (GMI) between two consecutive kidney transplant biopsies, and if so to determine their potential impact on graft survival. METHODS: Two consecutive biopsies were performed on the same renal graft in 623 patients. GMI was categorized into three GMI classes: ≤1.8 Low, 1.9-4.5 Medium, and ≥4.6 High. This division yielded nine possible switches between the first and second biopsies (Low-Low, Low-Medium, etc.). Cox-regressions were used and hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) are presented. RESULTS: The worst graft survival was observed in the High-High group, and the best graft survival was observed in the Low-Low and High-Low groups. Compared to the High-High group, a reduction of risk was observed in nearly all other decreasing groups (reductions between 65% and 80% of graft loss). After adjustment for covariates, the risk for graft-loss was lower in the Low-Low (HR = 0.24, CI 0.13-0.46), Low-Medium (HR = 0.25, CI 0.11-0.55), Medium-Low (HR = 0.29, CI 0.11-0.77), and the High-Low GMI (HR = 0.31, CI 0.10-0.98) groups compared to the High-High group as the reference. CONCLUSIONS: GMI may change dynamically, and the latest finding is of most prognostic importance. GMI should be considered in all evaluations of biopsy findings since high or increasing GMI levels are associated with shorter graft survival. Future studies need to consider therapeutic strategies to lower or maintain a low GMI. A high GMI besides a vague histological finding should be considered as a warning sign requiring more frequent clinical follow up.

LIM Zinc Finger Domain Containing 1 Risk Genotype of Recipient Is Associated with Renal Tubular Inflammation in Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Homozygosity for LIMS1 rs893403-GG genotype is linked to an increased risk of allograft rejection after kidney transplantation. Ischemia-reperfusion of the kidney allograft leads to long term infiltration of activated and effector-memory T lymphocytes and resulting in rejection and long-term fibrosis. However, the genotype, LIMS1 expression under ischemic conditions and the long-term histopathological relationships remain ill-defined. METHODS: We examined the impact of the recipient's LIMS1-rs893403 genotype with transplant kidney histopathology. The association of the LIMS1-rs893403 genotype and LIMS1 and GCC2 mRNA expression in ischemic donor kidneys were also examined. Recipients who underwent transplant kidney biopsy were genotyped for the LIMS1-rs893403 variant and associated deletion. Histopathological findings were compared between recipients with LIMS1 risk and non-risk genotypes. Real-time PCR and immunofluorescence staining for LIMS1 and GCC2 expression were performed in non-utilized donor kidneys. RESULTS: Demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics and the histopathological diagnosis were similar between recipients with rs893403 GG and AA/AG genotype. The Banff tubulitis score was higher in GG recipients (n = 24) compared to AA/AG (n = 86) recipients (1.42 ± 0.65 vs. 1.12 ± 0.66, p = 0.03). Ischemic kidneys with GG showed higher LIMS1 and GCC2 mRNA expression than kidneys with AG. Kidneys with rs893403-GG had higher tubular LIMS1 and GCC2 immunohistochemical staining compared to kidneys with rs893403-AG. CONCLUSIONS: Our data supports the role of the LIMS1 locus in kidney transplant rejection, particularly in lymphocyte infiltration into the internal aspect of the tubular basement membranes. Increased LIMS1 and GCC2 expression in ischemic donor kidneys with the GG genotype require further studies.

Salidroside ameliorates acute liver transplantation rejection in rats by inhibiting neutrophil extracellular trap formation.

Acute rejection is an important factor affecting the survival of recipients after liver transplantation. Salidroside has various properties, including anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and hepatoprotective properties. This study aims to investigate whether salidroside can prevent acute rejection after liver transplantation and to examine the underlying mechanisms involved. An in vivo acute rejection model is established in rats that are pretreated with tacrolimus (1 mg/kg/d) or salidroside (10 or 20 mg/kg/d) for seven days after liver transplantation. In addition, an in vitro experiment is performed using neutrophils incubated with salidroside (1, 10, 50 or 100 µM). Hematoxylin-eosin staining, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling staining, immunosorbent assays, immunofluorescence analysis, Evans blue staining, and western blot analysis are performed to examine the impact of salidroside on NET formation and acute rejection in vitro and in vivo. We find that Salidroside treatment reduces pathological liver damage, serum aminotransferase level, and serum levels of IL-1ß, IL-6, and TNF-α in vivo. The expressions of proteins associated with the HMGB1/TLR-4/MAPK signaling pathway (HMGB1, TLR-4, p-ERK1/2, p-JNK, p-P38, cleaved caspase-3, cleaved caspase-9, Bcl-2, Bax, IL-1ß, TNF-α, and IL-6) are also decreased after salidroside treatment. In vitro experiments show that the release of HMGB1/TLR-4/MAPK signaling pathway-associated proteins from neutrophils treated with lipopolysaccharide is decreased by salidroside. Moreover, salidroside inhibits NETosis and protects against acute rejection by regulating the HMGB1/TLR-4/MAPK signaling pathway. Furthermore, salidroside combined with tacrolimus has a better effect than either of the other treatments alone. In summary, salidroside can prevent acute liver rejection after liver transplantation by reducing neutrophil extracellular trap development through the HMGB1/TLR-4/MAPK signaling pathway.

Pathology of explanted pediatric hearts: An 11-year study. Population characteristics and implications for outcomes.

BACKGROUND: As more pediatric patients become candidates for heart transplantation (HT), understanding pathological predictors of outcome and the accuracy of the pretransplantation evaluation are important to optimize utilization of scarce donor organs and improve outcomes. The authors aimed to investigate explanted heart specimens to identify pathologic predictors that may affect cardiac allograft survival after HT. METHODS: Explanted pediatric hearts obtained over an 11-year period were analyzed to understand the patient demographics, indications for transplant, and the clinical-pathological factors. RESULTS: In this study, 149 explanted hearts, 46% congenital heart defects (CHD), were studied. CHD patients were younger and mean pulmonary artery pressure and resistance were significantly lower than in cardiomyopathy patients. Twenty-one died or underwent retransplantation (14.1%). Survival was significantly higher in the cardiomyopathy group at all follow-up intervals. There were more deaths and the 1-, 5- and 7-year survival was lower in patients ≤10 years of age at HT. Early rejection was significantly higher in CHD patients exposed to homograft tissue, but not late rejection. Mortality/retransplantation rate was significantly higher and allograft survival lower in CHD hearts with excessive fibrosis of one or both ventricles. Anatomic diagnosis at pathologic examination differed from the clinical diagnosis in eight cases. CONCLUSIONS: Survival was better for the cardiomyopathy group and patients >10 years at HT. Prior homograft use was associated with a higher prevalence of early rejection. Ventricular fibrosis (of explant) was a strong predictor of outcome in the CHD group. We presented several pathologic findings in explanted pediatric hearts.

Banff-based histologic chronicity index is associated with graft failure but has poor interobserver reproducibility.

BACKGROUND: Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) often leads to chronic kidney allograft damage and is a critical cause of allograft failure. The Banff classification, used to diagnose AMR, has become complex and challenging for clinicians. A Banff-based histologic chronicity index (CI) was recently proposed as a simplified prognostic indicator. Its reliability and reproducibility have not been externally validated. METHODS: This study investigated 71 kidney allograft biopsies diagnosed with AMR. Interobserver reproducibility of the recently proposed CI and its components (cg, cv, ct, and ci) were assessed. The association between CI and allograft failure was analyzed, and CI cut-off values were evaluated by Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan-Meier estimator with log-rank test. RESULTS: The study confirmed the association of CI with allograft failure, but also revealed that the assessment of CI varied between pathologists, impacting its reproducibility as a prognostic tool. Only 49 (69.0%) of the biopsies showed complete agreement on the proposed cut-off value of CI < 4 or CI ≥ 4. Furthermore, this cut-off did not reliably stratify allograft failure. Notably, the cg score, which carries significant weight in the CI calculation, had the lowest agreement between observers (kappa = .281). CONCLUSIONS: While a simplified prognostic indicator for AMR is needed, this study highlights the limitations of CI, particularly its poor interobserver reproducibility. Our findings suggest that clinicians should interpret CI cautiously and consider establishing their own cut-off values. This study underscores the need to address interobserver reproducibility before CI can be widely adopted for AMR management.

[Update kidney allograft pathology : A better depiction of microvascular inflammation]. / Update Nierentransplantationspathologie : Eine bessere Darstellung der mikrovaskulären Entzündung.

BACKGROUND: The Banff Foundation produces recommendations for classifying various lesions in renal allografts. Experts gather to update the classification every other year based on new scientific and clinical evidence. OBJECTIVES: This article presents the most important changes incorporated into the new recommendations after the last Banff conference. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The author of this article personally took part in the Banff conference and the subsequent survey, reported on the activities of a Banff working group (peritubular capillaritis) on-site, and contributed to drafting the recently published meeting report. RESULTS: Lesions of antibody-mediated kidney allograft rejection (AMR), especially microvascular inflammation, have been part of the diagnostic algorithm for over 20 years. Experts advocated for a simplified AMR algorithm and mindful inclusion of molecular pathological data in the clinicopathological reflection regarding therapeutic decision. A new, more descriptive diagnostic entity-microvascular inflammation, C4d negative and DSA negative-has been introduced into the AMR category to acknowledge this histological constellation and motivate research into this pathophysiologically and immunologically probably different phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: The Banff classification provides a structure for diagnosing kidney transplant pathology. Regular updates serve to adapt to ever-growing knowledge about alloimmunity. Particular challenges are capturing the complexity of various immunological scenarios and ensuring an understandable representation of these in a pathology report.

[Impact of the ratio between graft and host corneal size on immune rejection, re-bubbling rate and postoperative endothelial cell loss in 457 eyes after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK)]. / Einfluss des Verhältnisses von Transplantatgröße zu Hornhautgröße auf Immunreaktion, Re-Bubbling-Rate und postoperativen Endothelzellverlust bei 457 Augen nach Descemet-Membrane-Endothelial-Keratoplastik (DMEK).

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the ratio between the graft and host corneal size (RGH) on postoperative complications, such as immune reactions, re-bubbling rate and endothelial cell loss (ECL) after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospectively, 457 patient eyes were included which had undergone surgery between 2016 and 2019 in the Department of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center in Homburg/Saar using DMEK or triple DMEK, diagnosed as Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy (n = 431), pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (n = 9) and others (n = 17). The follow-up period extended until the end of 2020. Main outcome measures included immune reaction (IR), re-bubbling rate and the postoperative endothelial cell loss (ECL) at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months and whether these measures depended on the RGH. RESULTS: The RGH in this study ranged from 0.35 to 0.62 (0.46 ± 0.04). There were 33 (7.2%) postoperative IRs (DMEK n = 25; triple DMEK n = 8). The average RGH without IR (0.46 ± 0.04) was significantly (p = 0.038) smaller than in the group with IR (0.47 ± 0.05). Re-bubbling was necessary in 159 of 457 (34.8%) patient eyes. The RGH in patient eyes with re-bubbling (0.47 ± 0.04) was significantly (p = 0.014) higher than that in eyes without re-bubbling (0.45 ± 0.04). The mean preoperative endothelial cell count (ECD) was 2603 ± 251 cells/mm2 (min: 2161, max: 3500 cells/mm2). It was shown that a larger RGH had no positive influence on endothelial cell loss (r = 0.001; p = 0.974). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that a larger graft diameter compared to host corneal size is associated with an increased rate of immune reactions and a higher re-bubbling rate after DMEK. Otherwise, a larger RGH had no positive influence on endothelial cell loss after DMEK. Accordingly, the graft size for DMEK should not be unnecessarily large, especially in eyes with Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy.

The CaMK Family Differentially Promotes Necroptosis and Mouse Cardiac Graft Injury and Rejection.

Organ transplantation is associated with various forms of programmed cell death which can accelerate transplant injury and rejection. Targeting cell death in donor organs may represent a novel strategy for preventing allograft injury. We have previously demonstrated that necroptosis plays a key role in promoting transplant injury. Recently, we have found that mitochondria function is linked to necroptosis. However, it remains unknown how necroptosis signaling pathways regulate mitochondrial function during necroptosis. In this study, we investigated the receptor-interacting protein kinase 3 (RIPK3) mediated mitochondrial dysfunction and necroptosis. We demonstrate that the calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (CaMK) family members CaMK1, 2, and 4 form a complex with RIPK3 in mouse cardiac endothelial cells, to promote trans-phosphorylation during necroptosis. CaMK1 and 4 directly activated the dynamin-related protein-1 (Drp1), while CaMK2 indirectly activated Drp1 via the phosphoglycerate mutase 5 (PGAM5). The inhibition of CaMKs restored mitochondrial function and effectively prevented endothelial cell death. CaMKs inhibition inhibited activation of CaMKs and Drp1, and cell death and heart tissue injury (n = 6/group, p < 0.01) in a murine model of cardiac transplantation. Importantly, the inhibition of CaMKs greatly prolonged heart graft survival (n = 8/group, p < 0.01). In conclusion, CaMK family members orchestrate cell death in two different pathways and may be potential therapeutic targets in preventing cell death and transplant injury.

Impact of hyperparathyroidism on allograft histology and function after kidney transplantation: Rethinking its causal role in graft dysfunction.

INTRODUCTION: The causal relationship between hyperparathyroidism and kidney graft dysfunction remains inconclusive. Applying Bradford-Hill's temporality and consistency causation principles, we assessed the effect of parathyroid hormone (iPTH) on graft histology and eGFR trajectory on kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with normal time-zero graft biopsies. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study evaluating the effect of hyperparathyroidism on interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IF/TA) development in 1232 graft biopsies. Pre-transplant hyperparathyroidism was categorized by KDIGO or KDOQI criteria, and post-transplant hyperparathyroidism by iPTH >1× and >2× the URL 1 year after transplantation. RESULTS: We included 325 KTRs (56% female, age 38 ± 13 years, follow-up 4.2 years [IQR: 2.7-5.8]). Based on pre-transplant iPTH levels, 26% and 66% exceeded the KDIGO and KDOQI targets, respectively. There were no significant differences in the development of >25% IF/TA between KTRs with pre-transplant iPTH levels above and within target range according to KDIGO (53% vs. 62%, P = .16, HR.94 [95% CI:.67-1.32]) and KDOQI (60% vs. 60%, P = 1.0, HR 1.19 [95% CI:.88-1.60]) criteria. Similarly, there were no differences when using 1 year post-transplant iPTH cut-offs > 88 pg/mL (58% vs. 64%, P = .33) and > 176 pg/mL (55% vs. 62%, P = .19). After adjusting for confounders, no significant differences were observed in eGFR trajectories among the iPTH strata. CONCLUSION: In young KTRs who received a healthy graft, no association was found between increased pre- and post-transplant iPTH levels and graft dysfunction, as assessed histologically and through eGFR trajectory. The concept of hyperparathyroidism as a risk factor for graft dysfunction in recipients at low risk requires reevaluation.

Indications, Techniques, and Barriers for Pancreas Transplant Biopsy: A Consensus Perspective From a Survey of US Centers.

BACKGROUND: Pancreas transplant biopsy practices for the diagnosis of rejection or other pathologies are not well described. METHODS: We conducted a survey of staff at US pancreas transplant programs (March 22, 2022, to August 22, 2022) to assess current program practices and perceptions about the utility and challenges in the performance and interpretation of pancreas allograft biopsies. RESULTS: Respondents represented 65% (76/117) of active adult pancreas transplant programs, capturing 66% of recent pancreas transplant volume in the United States. Participants were most often nephrologists (52%), followed by surgeons (46%), and other staff (4%). Pancreas allograft biopsies were performed mostly by interventional radiologists (74%), followed by surgeons (11%), nephrologists (8%), and gastroenterologists (1%). Limitations in the radiologist's or biopsy performer's comfort level or expertise to safely perform a biopsy, or to obtain sufficient/adequate samples were the two most common challenges with pancreas transplant biopsies. Pancreas transplant biopsies were read by local pathologists at a majority (86%) of centers. Challenges reported with pancreas biopsy interpretation included poor reliability, lack of reporting of C4d staining, lack of reporting of rejection grading, and inconclusive interpretation of the biopsy. Staff at a third of responding programs (34%) stated that they rarely or never perform pancreas allograft biopsies and treat presumed rejection empirically. CONCLUSIONS: This national survey identified significant variation in clinical practices related to pancreas allograft biopsies and potential barriers to pancreas transplant utilization across the United States. Consideration of strategies to improve program experience with percutaneous pancreas biopsy and to support optimal management of pancreas allograft rejection informed by histology is warranted.

Banff 2022 Liver Group Meeting report: Monitoring long-term allograft health.

The Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology met in September 2022. Participants included hepatologists, surgeons, pathologists, immunologists, and histocompatibility specialists. Presentations and discussions focused on the evaluation of long-term allograft health, including noninvasive and tissue monitoring, immunosuppression optimization, and long-term structural changes. Potential revision of the rejection classification scheme to better accommodate and communicate late T cell-mediated rejection patterns and related structural changes, such as nodular regenerative hyperplasia, were discussed. Improved stratification of long-term maintenance immunosuppression to match the heterogeneity of patient settings will be central to improving long-term patient survival. Such personalized therapeutics are in turn contingent on a better understanding and monitoring of allograft status within a rational decision-making approach, likely to be facilitated in implementation with emerging decision-support tools. Proposed revisions to rejection classification emerging from the meeting include the incorporation of interface hepatitis and fibrosis staging. These will be opened to online testing, modified accordingly, and subject to consensus discussion leading up to the next Banff conference.

Back to the future: the uncharted role of T cells in chronic and unexplained microvascular inflammation.

The 2022 Banff classification for kidney allograft pathology introduced the category "microvascular inflammation DSA-negative and C4d-negative" for cases without evidence of a humoral cause. Many questions remain about the etiology, prognosis, and treatment of this phenotype. Cristoferi et al. performed a molecular comparison of chronic active antibody-mediated rejection and its seronegative counterpart and suggest a central role for T cells in chronic donor-specific antibody-negative, C4d-negative microvascular inflammation. These results further question how we should classify rejection.

Protocol liver biopsy predicts graft survival after liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The use of protocol liver biopsy to monitor liver allograft status remains controversial. There is limited data from modern transplantation populations that includes protocol biopsies to evaluate its value in predicting clinical outcomes. METHODS: All protocol liver biopsies were identified from 875 patients who underwent liver transplantation at Helsinki University Hospital between 2000 and 2019. Each histologic component was analyzed for its ability to predict long-term outcomes, especially graft survival. We determined the frequency of significant biopsy findings based on the Banff working group definition. Liver function tests (LFTs) and clinical markers were evaluated for their ability to predict significant biopsy findings. RESULTS: In total, 867 protocol liver biopsies were analyzed. Significant findings were identified in 20.1% of the biopsies. In the first protocol biopsy, steatohepatitis (hazard ratio [HR] 3.504, p = .03) and moderate or severe congestion (HR 3.338, p = .04) predicted graft loss. The presence of cholangitis (HR 2.563, p = .04), necrosis (HR 7.635, p < .001), mild congestion (HR 4.291, p = .009), and significant biopsy finding (HR 2.540, p = .02) predicted inferior death-censored graft survival. While the degree of elevation of LFTs was positively associated with significant biopsy findings, the discrimination was poor (AUC .572-.622). Combined LFTs and clinical risk factors remained suboptimal for discriminating significant biopsy findings (AUC .696). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the use of protocol liver biopsies after liver transplantation since they frequently revealed changes associated with long-term outcomes, even when LFTs were normal.

Optimizing the approach to monitoring allograft inflammation using serial urinary CXCL10/creatinine testing in pediatric kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Urinary CXCL10/creatinine (uCXCL10/Cr) is proposed as an effective biomarker of subclinical rejection in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. This study objective was to model implementation in the clinical setting. METHODS: Banked urine samples at a single center were tested for uCXCL10/Cr to validate published thresholds for rejection diagnosis (>80% specificity). The positive predictive value (PPV) for rejection diagnosis for uCXCL10/Cr-indicated biopsy was modeled with first-positive versus two-test-positive approaches, with accounting for changes associated with urinary tract infection (UTI), BK and CMV viremia, and subsequent recovery. RESULTS: Seventy patients aged 10.5 ± 5.6 years at transplant (60% male) had n = 726 urine samples with n = 236 associated biopsies (no rejection = 167, borderline = 51, and Banff 1A = 18). A threshold of 12 ng/mmol was validated for Banff 1A versus no-rejection diagnosis (AUC = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.57-0.92). The first-positive test approach (n = 69) did not resolve a clinical diagnosis in 38 cases (55%), whereas the two-test approach resolved a clinical diagnosis in the majority as BK (n = 17/60, 28%), CMV (n = 4/60, 7%), UTI (n = 8/60, 13%), clinical rejection (n = 5/60, 8%), and transient elevation (n = 18, 30%). In those without a resolved clinical diagnosis, PPV from biopsy for subclinical rejection is 24% and 71% (p = .017), for first-test versus two-test models, respectively. After rejection treatment, uCXCL10/Cr level changes were all concordant with change in it-score. Sustained uCXCL10/Cr after CMV and BK viremia resolution was associated with later acute rejection. CONCLUSIONS: Urinary CXCL10/Cr reliably identifies kidney allograft inflammation. These data support a two-test approach to reliably exclude other clinically identifiable sources of inflammation, for kidney biopsy indication to rule out subclinical rejection.

New Insights into Pediatric Kidney Transplant Rejection Biomarkers: Tissue, Plasma and Urine MicroRNAs Compared to Protocol Biopsy Histology.

The early identification of a subclinical rejection (SCR) can improve the long-term outcome of the transplanted kidney through intensified immunosuppression. However, the only approved diagnostic method is the protocol biopsy, which remains an invasive method and not without minor and/or major complications. The protocol biopsy is defined as the sampling of allograft tissue at pre-established times even in the absence of an impaired renal function; however, it does not avoid histological damage. Therefore, the discovery of new possible biomarkers useful in the prevention of SCR has gained great interest. Among all the possible candidates, there are microRNAs (miRNAs), which are short, noncoding RNA sequences, that are involved in mediating numerous post-transcriptional pathways. They can be found not only in tissues, but also in different biological fluids, both as free particles and contained in extracellular vesicles (EVs) released by different cell types. In this study, we firstly performed a retrospective miRNA screening analysis on biopsies and serum EV samples of 20 pediatric transplanted patients, followed by a second screening on another 10 pediatric transplanted patients' urine samples at one year post-transplant. In both cohorts, we divided the patients into two groups: patients with histological SCR and patients without histological SCR at one year post-transplantation. The isolated miRNAs were analyzed in an NGS platform to identify different expressions in the two allograft states. Although no statistical data were found in sera, in the tissue and urinary EVs, we highlighted signatures of miRNAs associated with the histological SCR state.

Significance of Perivascular Aggregates in Kidney Allografts: Evaluation of 1-Year Protocol Biopsies Using Recent Banff Classification.

BACKGROUND: Perivascular aggregates (PVAs) often occur in kidney allografts; however, their significance needs to be re-evaluated in light of changes in the concept and criteria of allograft rejection. METHODS: We reviewed 1-year protocol biopsies in 258 patients with kidney transplants to identify PVAs and concurrent pathology based on the Banff 2017 classification, including revised criteria for chronic active T-cell mediated rejection (CA-TCMR). We investigated the incidence of PVA, concurrent allograft lesions, diagnosis, and graft survival. No prisoners were used in this study, and no participants were coerced or paid. RESULTS: We identified PVA in 81 biopsies (31.4%). The incidence of previous rejection (32.1% vs 12.4%, P= .0003) and total inflammation (1.3 ± 0.8 vs 0.6 ± 0.8, P < .0001), inflammation (0.7 ± 0.8 vs 0.2 ± 0.5, P < .0001), inflammation in the area of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (1.3 ± 1.2 vs 0.7 ± 0.9, P < .0001), tubulitis (1.4 ± 1.1 vs 0.6 ± 0.9, P < .0001), and interstitial fibrosis scores (1.2 ± 0.9 vs 0.9 ± 0.9, P= .01) were higher in PVA-positive compared with patients with PVA-negative. Diagnoses in the PVA-positive group revealed no rejection in 49.4%, CA-TCMR in 21.0%, borderline changes in 18.5%, and acute TCMR in 6.2%. CA-TCMR was more frequent in patients with PVA-positive (21.0% vs 4.0%, P < .0001). Graft survival was similar in both groups among all patients, no-rejection, any type of rejection, and CA-TCMR subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: PVAs occur heterogeneously and are associated with previous rejection or concurrent CA-TCMR. The prognostic significance of PVAs in kidney transplantation is inconclusive, and further investigations are needed.

Hepatic granulomas following liver transplantation: A retrospective survey, and analysis of possible microbiological etiology.

BACKGROUND: Liver granulomas have always been a diagnostic challenge for pathologists. They have been described in up to 15% of liver biopsies and can also be seen in liver allograft biopsy specimens, but there is a paucity of information regarding the prevalence and associated etiologic factors of granulomas in liver transplanted patients. The aim of this study is to shed light on the etiology of liver granulomas. METHODS: Liver biopsies from liver transplanted patients, in the period from 01.01.2011 - 01.05.2017, were examined. We registered the histo-morphological characteristics and clinicopathological data of all biopsies and performed next-generation sequencing (NGS) to detect possible pathogens (bacteria, fungi, and parasites) in the biopsies containing granulomas. RESULTS: We reviewed a total of 400 liver biopsies from 217 liver transplant patients. Of these, 131 liver biopsies (32.8%) from 98 patients (45.2%) revealed granulomas. Most were epithelioid granulomas located parenchymal and were detected in 115 (87.7%) biopsies. We also identified 10 cases (7.6%) with both lobular and portal granulomas and six biopsies (4.5%) with portal granulomas alone. In 54 biopsies (41.2%), granulomas were found in biopsies with acute cellular rejection (ACR). Fifty (51%) patients with granulomas underwent liver transplantation for autoimmune-related end-stage liver disease (AILD). The granulomas were found most frequently in the first six months after transplantation, where patients also more often were biopsied. NGS analysis did not reveal any potential infectious agent, and no significant differences were observed in the microbiological diversity (microbiome) between clinical- and granuloma characteristics concerning bacteria, fungi, and parasites. CONCLUSION: Our study confirmed that granulomas are frequently seen in liver allograft biopsy specimens, and most often localized in the parenchyma, occurring in the first post-transplant period in patients with AILD, and often seen simultaneously with episodes of ACR. Neither a specific microbiological etiological agent nor a consistent microbiome was detected in any case.

Banff scoring of kidney allograft biopsies: "Manual" application vs software-assisted sign-out.

OBJECTIVES: Pathologists interpreting kidney allograft biopsies using the Banff system usually start by recording component scores (eg, i, t, cg) using histopathologic criteria committed to memory. Component scores are then melded into diagnoses using the same manual/mental processes. This approach to complex Banff rules during routine sign-out produces a lack of fidelity and needs improvement. METHODS: We constructed a web-based "smart template" (software-assisted sign-out) system that uniquely starts with upstream Banff-defined additional diagnostic parameters (eg, infection) and histopathologic criteria (eg, percent interstitial inflammation) collectively referred to as feeder data that is then translated into component scores and integrated into final diagnoses using software-encoded decision trees. RESULTS: Software-assisted sign-out enables pathologists to (1) accurately and uniformly apply Banff rules, thereby eliminating human inconsistencies (present in 25% of the cohort); (2) document areas of improvement; (3) show improved correlation with function; (4) examine t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding clustering for diagnosis stratification; and (5) ready upstream incorporation of artificial intelligence-assisted scoring of biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the legacy approach, software-assisted sign-out improves Banff accuracy and fidelity, more closely correlates with kidney function, is practical for routine clinical work and translational research studies, facilitates downstream integration with nonpathology data, and readies biopsy scoring for artificial intelligence algorithms.

Recurrence of membranous nephropathy after kidney transplantation: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Membranous nephropathy (MN) is a leading cause of kidney failure worldwide and frequently recurs after transplant. Available data originated from small retrospective cohort studies or registry analyses; therefore, uncertainties remain on risk factors for MN recurrence and response to therapy. Within the Post-Transplant Glomerular Disease Consortium, we conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study examining the MN recurrence rate, risk factors, and response to treatment. This study screened 22,921 patients across 3 continents and included 194 patients who underwent a kidney transplant due to biopsy-proven MN. The cumulative incidence of MN recurrence was 31% at 10 years posttransplant. Patients with a faster progression toward end-stage kidney disease were at higher risk of developing recurrent MN (hazard ratio [HR], 0.55 per decade; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-0.88). Moreover, elevated pretransplant levels of anti-phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) antibodies were strongly associated with recurrence (HR, 18.58; 95% CI, 5.37-64.27). Patients receiving rituximab for MN recurrence had a higher likelihood of achieving remission than patients receiving renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibition alone. In sum, MN recurs in one-third of patients posttransplant, and measurement of serum anti-PLA2R antibody levels shortly before transplant could aid in risk-stratifying patients for MN recurrence. Moreover, patients receiving rituximab had a higher rate of treatment response.