Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.156
Filter
1.
Health Promot Int ; 39(4)2024 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38984687

ABSTRACT

Using data from the 2022 Korea Community Health Survey (n = 13 320), this study investigated helmet use and related factors among Korean adults using personal mobility devices, without distinguishing between private and hired users. Among mobility device users, 32.1% responded that they always wore a helmet. The proportion of helmet use was 35.2% among men, 25.8% among women, 29.2% among those aged 19-44 years, 42.3% among those aged 45-64 years and 26.6% among those aged 65 years or older. Furthermore, those who drank less frequently and were physically active were more likely to wear helmets. Moreover, people who always wore a seat belt when driving a car or sitting in the rear seat and people who always wore a helmet when riding a motorcycle were more likely to wear a helmet while using electric personal mobility devices. Approximately one-third of users always wore a helmet. The helmet-wearing rate was related to general characteristics such as gender and education level, and to safety behaviors such as wearing a seat belt when driving a car, sitting in the rear seat of a car, or when riding a motorcycle. In addition to considering personal characteristics investigated in this study, the helmet-wearing rate should be improved through policies or systems at the national or regional levels.


Subject(s)
Head Protective Devices , Humans , Head Protective Devices/statistics & numerical data , Male , Female , Republic of Korea , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Young Adult , Seat Belts/statistics & numerical data , Health Surveys
2.
Ann Med ; 56(1): 2362862, 2024 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38902979

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Headgear designed to protect girls' lacrosse athletes is widely available and permitted for voluntary use; however, it remains unknown how policies mandating headgear use may change the sport and, particularly regarding impacts during game-play. Therefore, this study compares the impact rates and game play characteristics of girls' high school lacrosse in Florida which mandates headgear use (HM), with states having no headgear mandate (NHM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Video from 189 randomly-selected games (HM: 64, NHM: 125) were analyzed. Descriptive statistics, Impact Rates (IR), Impact Rate Ratios (IRR), Impact Proportion Ratios (IPR), and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) were calculated. IRRs and IPRs with corresponding CIs that excluded 1.00 were deemed statistically significant. RESULTS: 16,340 impacts (HM:5,821 NHM: 10,519; 86.6 impacts/game, CI: 88.6-93.3) were identified using the Lacrosse Incident Analysis Instrument (LIAI). Most impacts directly struck the body (n = 16,010, 98%). A minority of impacts directly struck a player's head (n = 330, 2%). The rate of head impacts was significantly higher in the HM cohort than NHM cohort (IRR = 2.1; 95% CI = 1.7-2.6). Most head impacts (n = 271, 82%) were caused by stick contact in both groups. There was no difference in the proportion of penalties administered for head impacts caused by stick contact between the HM and NHM cohorts (IPR IRRHM/NHM = 0.98; CI = 0.79-1.16). However, there was a significantly greater proportion of head impacts caused by player contact that resulted in a penalty administered in the HM cohort (IPR = 1.44 CI = 1.17-1.54). CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate that mandating headgear use was associated with a two-fold greater likelihood of sustaining a head impact during game play compared to NHM states. A majority of head impacts in both HM and NHM states were caused by illegal stick contact that did not result in penalty.


High school girls' lacrosse athletes participating in a state with a headgear mandate was twice as likely to sustain a head impact than those participating in states without headgear mandates.Stick contact remains the most common mechanism of head impacts in girls' lacrosse, regardless of mandating headgear.Regardless of whether headgear was or was not mandated, most head impacts caused by stick contact did not result in a penalty.


Subject(s)
Head Protective Devices , Racquet Sports , Humans , Female , Adolescent , Head Protective Devices/statistics & numerical data , Florida/epidemiology , Schools/statistics & numerical data , Athletic Injuries/prevention & control , Athletic Injuries/epidemiology , Brain Concussion/epidemiology , Brain Concussion/prevention & control , Craniocerebral Trauma/epidemiology , Craniocerebral Trauma/prevention & control
3.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 1645, 2024 Jun 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38902622

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Wearing a helmet reduces the risk of head injuries substantially in the event of a motorcycle crash. Countries around the world are committed to promoting helmet use, but the progress has been slow and uneven. There is an urgent need for large-scale data collection for situation assessment and intervention evaluation. METHODS: This study proposes a scalable, low-cost algorithm to estimate helmet-wearing rates. Applying the state-of-the-art deep learning technique for object detection to images acquired from Google Street View, the algorithm has the potential to provide accurate estimates at the global level. RESULTS: Trained on a sample of 3995 images, the algorithm achieved high accuracy. The out-of-sample prediction results for all three object classes (helmets, drivers, and passengers) reveal a precision of 0.927, a recall value of 0.922, and a mean average precision at 50 (mAP50) of 0.956. DISCUSSION: The remarkable model performance suggests the algorithm's capacity to generate accurate estimates of helmet-wearing rates from an image source with global coverage. The significant enhancement in the availability of helmet usage data resulting from this approach could bolster progress tracking and facilitate evidence-based policymaking for helmet wearing globally.


Subject(s)
Deep Learning , Head Protective Devices , Head Protective Devices/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Algorithms , Accidents, Traffic/prevention & control , Craniocerebral Trauma/prevention & control
4.
ScientificWorldJournal ; 2024: 7090576, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38756481

ABSTRACT

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a structured questionnaire involving 402 motorcyclists from four major southeastern towns, comprising 350 (86.07%) males and 52 (12.93%) females. The chi-square test was applied in bivariate analysis, and binary multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine the risk factors of road traffic crashes. Results: This study's findings revealed that the overall reported prevalence of road traffic crashes involving motorcycle drivers over one year was 68.66%. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed several factors that significantly impacted road traffic crashes. These factors included driving without a valid driving license, the young age (<20) of motorcyclists, driving in rainy weather, exceeding the speed limit, per-week working hours, smoking status, motorcycle ownership, the brand of motorcycle, and not wearing a helmet while driving. Conclusion: The study findings highlight the need for improving motorcycle safety by implementing measures such as imposing per-week work hour limits for riders, enforcing traffic regulations, and promoting helmet use among motorcycle drivers. The results of this study draw attention to the Bangladesh Road Transport Authority (BRTA) and motorcycle drivers in the country to decrease motorcycle crashes and the severity of injuries by implementing efficient guidelines and strategies for driving motorcycles. The findings of this study can assist policymakers and concerned authorities in taking the essential steps to lessen road traffic crashes among motorcyclists in Bangladesh.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Traffic , Motorcycles , Humans , Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data , Motorcycles/statistics & numerical data , Bangladesh/epidemiology , Female , Male , Adult , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Cross-Sectional Studies , Young Adult , Middle Aged , Adolescent , Automobile Driving/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Head Protective Devices/statistics & numerical data
5.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 60(4)2024 Mar 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38674186

ABSTRACT

Background and Objectives: In recent years, electronic scooters (e-scooters) have gained popularity, whether for private use or as a publicly available transportation method. With the introduction of these vehicles, reports of e-scooter-related accidents have surged, sparking public debate and concern. The aim of this study was to analyze the epidemiological data, characteristics, and severity of traumatic brain injury (TBI) related to e-scooter accidents. Materials and Methods: This retrospective case series evaluated patients who were admitted to the three largest neurosurgery clinics in Riga, Latvia, from the time period of April to October in two separate years-2022 and 2023-after e-scooter-related accidents. The data were collected on patient demographics, the time of the accident, alcohol consumption, helmet use, the type of TBI, other related injuries, and the treatment and assessment at discharge. Results: A total of 28 patients were admitted with TBI related to e-scooter use, with a median age of 30 years (Q1-Q3, 20.25-37.25), four individuals under the age of 18, and the majority (64%) being male. In 23 cases, the injury mechanism was falling, in 5 cases, collision. None were wearing a helmet at the time of the injury. Alcohol intoxication was evident in over half of the patients (51.5%), with severe intoxication (>1.2 g/L) in 75% of cases among them. Neurological symptoms upon admission were noted in 50% of cases. All patients had intracranial trauma: 50% had brain contusions, 43% traumatic subdural hematoma, and almost 30% epidural hematoma. Craniofacial fractures were evident in 71% of cases, and there were fractures in other parts of body in three patients. Six patients required emergency neurosurgical intervention. Neurological complications were noted in two patients; one patient died. Conclusions: e-scooter-related accidents result in a significant number of brain and other associated injuries, with notable frequency linked to alcohol influence and a lack of helmet use. Prevention campaigns to raise the awareness of potential risks and the implementation of more strict regulations should be conducted.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic , Humans , Latvia/epidemiology , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/epidemiology , Male , Adult , Female , Retrospective Studies , Head Protective Devices/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Motorcycles/statistics & numerical data
6.
Traffic Inj Prev ; 25(5): 757-764, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38578267

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Head injuries resulting from e-scooter use have led to calls for helmet use to be promoted or mandatory. Helmet use is mandatory for e-scooters in Australia but observational studies have reported significant levels of nonuse, particularly by riders of shared e-scooters. The aim of this study is to understand whether nonuse in the mandatory context is a consistent behavior for an individual or is situationally-influenced, and what are the factors associated with nonuse. METHODS: An online survey was completed between 2022 and 2023 by 360 adult e-scooter riders in Canberra, Australia. Riders were asked whether they had worn a helmet on their last ride and how often they had not worn a helmet when riding in the last 30 days. The survey also asked about rider characteristics (demographics, frequency of e-scooter and bicycle use, perceived risk of e-scooter use, e-scooter ownership, and risky behaviors while riding), trip duration and perceptions of the helmet requirement (knowledge of and support for the law). RESULTS: Respondents were mostly male, young, highly educated, and full-time workers. Of the 29.1% of riders who reported riding without a helmet in the last 30 days, 24.4% had worn a helmet at least once during that period and 4.8% had consistently not worn a helmet. Younger age, shared e-scooter use and more frequent riding frequency (shared e-scooters only) were associated with helmet nonuse in the bivariate analyses but not in the logistic regression. Logistic regression showed that the independent predictors of helmet nonuse were the number of risky riding behaviors, lack of knowledge, and lack of support for the law. CONCLUSIONS: Most nonuse of helmets in a mandatory context seems to be situational, rather than consistent. Many of the factors associated with nonuse of helmets for e-scooters are similar to those reported for bicycles. Nonuse of helmets appears to be one of a number of risky behaviors performed by riders, rather than being primarily an outcome that is specific to factors associated with helmets (e.g., concerns about hygiene, discomfort or availability).


Subject(s)
Head Protective Devices , Head Protective Devices/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Adult , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adolescent , Craniocerebral Trauma/prevention & control , Craniocerebral Trauma/etiology , Australia , Motorcycles , Risk-Taking , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Aged
7.
Am Surg ; 90(6): 1702-1713, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38532248

ABSTRACT

Electric scooter (ES)-related injuries are increasing but poorly described. Clinicians need more information to be prepared for these patients. We supposed two prevalent patterns of patients: mildly injured (predominant upper-limb injuries) and severely injured (predominant head trauma). This study aims to understand the frequency of ES-related injuries and patients' characteristics despite the heterogeneity of data currently available. A systematic review with a proportion meta-analysis was conducted on studies with a multidisciplinary description of ES-related injuries in adult patients (PROSPERO-ID: CRD42022341241). Articles from inception to April 2023 were identified in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane's databases. The risk of bias was evaluated using ROBINS-I. Twenty-five observational studies with 5387 patients were included in the meta-analysis, depending on reported data. Upper-limb (31.8%) and head (19.5%) injuries are the most frequent (25/25 studies included). When injured while riding, 19.5% of patients are intoxicated with drugs/alcohol, and only 3.9% use a helmet, increasing the possibility of severe injuries. About 80% of patients are victims of spontaneous falls. Half of the patients self-present to the ED, and 69.4% of cases are discharged directly from the ED. Studies' limitations include an overall moderate risk of bias and high heterogeneity. Electric scooter-related accidents are commonly associated with upper-limb injuries but often involve the head. Spontaneous falls are the most common mechanism of injury, probably related to frequent substance abuse and helmet misuse. This hot topic is not adequately investigated due to a lack of data. A prospective registry could fill this gap.


Subject(s)
Craniocerebral Trauma , Humans , Accidental Falls/statistics & numerical data , Craniocerebral Trauma/epidemiology , Craniocerebral Trauma/etiology , Head Protective Devices/statistics & numerical data , Motorcycles
8.
PLoS One ; 17(1): e0262683, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35085315

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Road traffic accidents are a major global concern that affects all people regardless of their age, sex, wealth, and ethnicity. Injuries and deaths due to motorcycles are increasing, especially in developing countries. Wearing helmet is effective in reducing deaths and injuries caused by motorcycle accidents. OBJECTIVES: To assess the magnitude of helmet wearing behavior and its determinants among motorcycle riders in Sawula and Bulky towns, Gofa zone, Southern Ethiopia. METHODS: A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from April, 15 to May 25, 2020, among 422 motorcycle drivers in Sawula and Bulky towns, where people often drive motorcycles. A stratified sampling technique was used to recruit sampled drivers in a face-to-face interview. Data were entered into EPI-data version 3.1 software and exported to SPSS version 23 software to manage analysis. Descriptive analyses such as frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation were performed as necessary. Logistic regression models were fitted to identify the predictors of helmet wearing behavior. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to determine the magnitude and strength of the association. RESULTS: A total of 403 motorcycle drivers participated in the study which gave a 95.5% response rate. Among 403 motorcycle riders, only 12.4% (95% CI, 9.2 to 15.6%) wore helmets while driving motorcycles. Having license [AOR 3.51(95% C.I 1.56-7.89)], driving distance >10Km [AOR 2.53(95% C.I 1.08-5.91)], History of exposure to accident [AOR 2.71(95% C.I 1.32-5.55)], driving experience of ≥10 years [AOR 2.98 (95% C.I 1.25-7.09)] and high perceived susceptibility to accident [AOR 3.10(95% C.I 1.29-7.46)] had statistically significant association with helmet wearing compared to their counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that helmet-wearing behavior was very low. Having a license, driving distance, exposure to accidents, driving experience, and accident risk perception were determinants of helmet wearing behavior. These determinants imply the need for interventions that focus on behavioral change communications such as awareness creation campaigns and mandatory helmet wearing laws.


Subject(s)
Automobile Driving/statistics & numerical data , Head Protective Devices/statistics & numerical data , Motorcycles/statistics & numerical data , Accidents, Traffic/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Craniocerebral Trauma/prevention & control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Ethiopia , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Occupations/statistics & numerical data , Odds Ratio , Young Adult
9.
Am J Emerg Med ; 49: 385-392, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34271286

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether non-invasive ventilation (NIV) delivered by helmet continuous positive airway pressure (hCPAP) is non-inferior to facemask continuous positive airway pressure (fCPAP) in patients with acute respiratory failure in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: Non-inferiority randomized, clinical trial involving patients presenting with acute respiratory failure conducted in the ED of a local hospital. Participants were randomly allocated to receive either hCPAP or fCPAP as per the trial protocol. The primary endpoint was respiratory rate reduction. Secondary endpoints included discomfort, improvement in Dyspnea and Likert scales, heart rate reduction, arterial blood oxygenation, partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), dryness of mucosa and intubation rate. RESULTS: 224 patients were included and randomized (113 patients to hCPAP, 111 to fCPAP). Both techniques reduced respiratory rate (hCPAP: from 33.56 ± 3.07 to 25.43 ± 3.11 bpm and fCPAP: from 33.46 ± 3.35 to 27.01 ± 3.19 bpm), heart rate (hCPAP: from 114.76 ± 15.5 to 96.17 ± 16.50 bpm and fCPAP: from 115.07 ± 14.13 to 101.19 ± 16.92 bpm), and improved dyspnea measured by both the Visual Analogue Scale (hCPAP: from 16.36 ± 12.13 to 83.72 ± 12.91 and fCPAP: from 16.01 ± 11.76 to 76.62 ± 13.91) and the Likert scale. Both CPAP techniques improved arterial oxygenation (PaO2 from 67.72 ± 8.06 mmHg to 166.38 ± 30.17 mmHg in hCPAP and 68.99 ± 7.68 mmHg to 184.49 ± 36.38 mmHg in fCPAP) and the PaO2:FiO2 (Partial pressure of arterial oxygen: Fraction of inspired oxygen) ratio from 113.6 ± 13.4 to 273.4 ± 49.5 in hCPAP and 115.0 ± 12.9 to 307.7 ± 60.9 in fCPAP. The intubation rate was lower with hCPAP (4.4% for hCPAP versus 18% for fCPAP, absolute difference -13.6%, p = 0.003). Discomfort and dryness of mucosa were also lower with hCPAP. CONCLUSION: In patients presenting to the ED with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema or decompensated COPD, hCPAP was non-inferior to fCPAP and resulted in greater comfort levels and lower intubation rate.


Subject(s)
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure/instrumentation , Head Protective Devices/standards , Masks/standards , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Aged , Continuous Positive Airway Pressure/standards , Continuous Positive Airway Pressure/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Female , Head Protective Devices/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Masks/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Noninvasive Ventilation/instrumentation , Noninvasive Ventilation/methods
10.
J Safety Res ; 77: 212-216, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34092311

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Under current law in our rural state, there is no universal requirement for motorcyclists to wear helmets. Roughly 500 motorcycle crashes are reported by the state each year and only a fraction of those riders wear helmets. We sought to determine the difference in injury patterns and severity in helmeted versus non-helmeted riders. METHODS: Retrospective review (2014-2018) of a single level 1 trauma center's registry was done for subjects admitted after a motorcycle collision. Demographic, injury and patient outcome data were collected. Patients were stratified by helmet use (n = 81), no helmet use (n = 144), and unknown helmet use (n = 194). Statistical analysis used Student's t-test or Pearson's χ2p-value ≤0.05 as significant. State Department of Transportation data registry for state level mortality and collision incidence over the same time period was also obtained. RESULTS: Of the 2,022 state-reported motorcycle collisions, 419 individuals admitted to our trauma center were analyzed (21% capture). State-reported field fatality rate regardless of helmet use was 4%. Our inpatient mortality rate was 2% with no differences between helmet uses. Helmeted riders were found to have significantly fewer head and face injuries, higher GCS, lower face, neck, thorax and abdomen AIS, fewer required mechanical ventilation, shorter ICU length of stay, and had a greater number of upper extremity injuries and higher upper extremity AIS. CONCLUSIONS: Helmeted motorcyclists have fewer head, face, and cervical spine injuries, and lower injury severities: GCS and face, neck, thorax, abdomen AIS. Helmeted riders had significantly less mechanical ventilation requirement and shorter ICU stays. Non-helmeted riders sustained worse injuries. Practical Applications: Helmets provide safety and motorcycle riders have a 34-fold higher risk of death following a crash. Evaluating injury severities and patterns in motorcycle crash victims in a rural state with no helmet laws may provide insight into changing current legislation.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data , Head Protective Devices/statistics & numerical data , Motorcycles/statistics & numerical data , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Trauma Centers/statistics & numerical data , Accidents, Traffic/mortality , Adult , Age Distribution , Craniocerebral Trauma/epidemiology , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Registries , Respiration, Artificial , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Sex Distribution , Socioeconomic Factors
11.
Traffic Inj Prev ; 22(5): 401-406, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33960868

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: E-scooter use has grown rapidly in the United States. Its rise in popularity has coincided with the promotion of cycling in many cities, but more needs to be known about how these transportation modes compare to determine if cycling should serve as an appropriate benchmark for policy decisions and safety expectations regarding e-scooters. METHODS: We examined characteristics of adults seeking treatment in a Washington, DC, emergency department (ED) for injuries associated with riding e-scooters during 2019 (n = 99) or bicycles during 2015-2017 (n = 337). RESULTS: E-scooter incidents less frequently involved moving vehicles (13.1% vs. 37.7%) or occurred on roads (24.5% vs. 50.7%) than cycling incidents. A smaller proportion of injured e-scooter riders were ages 30-49 (32.3% vs. 48.4%) and a larger proportion were 50 and older (34.3% vs. 22.6%) or female (45.5% vs. 29.1%). Distal lower extremity injuries were more common among e-scooter riders (13.1% vs. 3.0%; RR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.79-3.54), and injuries to the proximal upper extremity (9.1% vs. 20.5%; RR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.24-0.92) or chest, abdomen, and spine (3.0% vs. 14.0%; RR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.07-0.70) were less common. Head injury rates were similar, but e-scooter riders more often experienced concussion with loss of consciousness (4.0% vs. 0.6%; RR, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.20-4.09) and were far less likely to wear helmets (2.0% vs. 66.4%). Estimated ED presentation rates per million miles traveled citywide were higher among e-scooter riders than cyclists (RR, 3.76; 95% CI, 3.08-4.59). CONCLUSIONS: E-scooters and bicycles are both popular forms of micromobility, but the characteristics of riders injured on them, the ways in which they become injured, and the types of injuries they sustain differ substantially. E-scooter rider injury rates, though currently high, may decrease as they gain experience; however, if the number of new users continues to climb, they will persist in using the ED more often than cyclists per mile that they travel.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data , Bicycling/statistics & numerical data , Craniocerebral Trauma/epidemiology , Trauma Severity Indices , Adult , Brain Concussion/epidemiology , Cities , District of Columbia , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Head Protective Devices/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
12.
Am J Med Genet A ; 185(9): 2670-2675, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34008890

ABSTRACT

Out of all the synostotic corrective surgeries, fronto-orbital advancement and cranial vault remodeling for patients with unilateral coronal synostosis is one of the hardest to maintain symmetric and proportional correction without some amount of relapse. Over the course of 20 years operating on these patients, the senior author has made multiple adjustments to compensate for relapse asymmetry, including overcorrection on the affected side, increased points of fixation, periosteal release, and scalp expansion with galeal scoring to minimize tension of the closure. As a result of these interventions, we have seen improved immediate results following surgery. However, we have continued to note clinically significant relapse postoperatively. As such, we have started to implement postoperative helmet therapy (PHT) to help maintain the surgical correction, improve secondary brachycephaly, and increase overall symmetry. PHT is a reasonable low-risk complement to fronto-orbital advancement and cranial vault remolding. Clinically, PHT appears to help minimize relapse and improve overall head symmetry. Further investigation and increased patient enrollment are required to determine the true benefits of PHT in this patient population.


Subject(s)
Cranial Sutures/surgery , Craniosynostoses/surgery , Head Protective Devices/statistics & numerical data , Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Skull/surgery , Craniosynostoses/pathology , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies
13.
Traffic Inj Prev ; 22(4): 301-306, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33829931

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Motorcycle helmets are the most common and effective protective device to reduce head injuries and mortality in crashes among powered two-wheeler riders. Even if they are globally recognized as effective, there are still concerns regarding their correct use, which is necessary to achieve maximum head protection. The goal of this systematic review is to assess which characteristics of helmet design and use showed a positive influence on rider safety, in order to provide insights to improve end-user helmet usage. METHODS: A literature search was carried out combining two sets of keywords, one related with either motorcycle or rider and the other referring to either protective equipment or injuries. After the exclusion of duplicates, 977 papers were screened by reviewers, thus identifying 32 papers that were analyzed in group discussions. RESULTS: Among the papers included in this study, no strong conflicting conclusions emerged in their results. The studies focusing on the use of different types of helmets highlighted that full-face helmets, compared with other standard helmets, have a positive influence on head injuries and facial injuries. Correct fastening was clearly beneficial for head and facial injuries, induced injuries, and helmet ejection. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review provides important insights to improve the usage of helmets by end-users. Correct fastening is a crucial factor to avoid helmet roll-off during a crash. Most studies agreed that full-face helmets provide higher protection in comparison with other standard helmets, especially for facial injuries, and no negative influence with respect to neck and spinal injuries.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Traffic/prevention & control , Head Protective Devices/statistics & numerical data , Motorcycles/statistics & numerical data , Spinal Injuries/prevention & control , Accidents, Traffic/mortality , Adult , Craniocerebral Trauma/prevention & control , Facial Injuries/prevention & control , Humans , Male , Protective Devices/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
14.
J Child Neurol ; 36(9): 768-775, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33834862

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between repetitive subconcussive head impacts and neurobehavioral outcomes in youth tackle football players. METHODS: Using helmet-based sensors, we measured head impacts for 3 consecutive seasons of play in 29 male players age 9-11. Cumulative impact g's were calculated. Players completed a battery of outcome measures before and after each season, including neuropsychological testing, vestibular-ocular sensitivity, and self- and parent-reported measures of symptoms and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). RESULTS: Average cumulative impact over 3 seasons was 13 900g. High-intensity hits predicted worse change for self-reported social adjustment (P = .001). Cumulative impact did not predict change in any of the outcome measures. History of ADHD, anxiety, and depression predicted worse change for self-reported symptoms and social adjustment, independent of head impacts. When players were stratified into 3 groups based on cumulative impact across all 3 seasons, differences in outcome measures existed prior to the start of the first season. These differences did not further increase over the course of the 3 seasons. CONCLUSION: Over 3 consecutive seasons of youth tackle football, we found no association between cumulative head impacts and neurobehavioral outcomes. Larger sample sizes and longer follow-up times would further assist in characterizing this relationship.


Subject(s)
Craniocerebral Trauma/classification , Football/injuries , Neurocognitive Disorders/etiology , Child , Cohort Studies , Craniocerebral Trauma/complications , Craniocerebral Trauma/epidemiology , Football/physiology , Head Protective Devices/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Michigan , Neurocognitive Disorders/epidemiology , Neuropsychological Tests/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Studies , Youth Sports/injuries , Youth Sports/physiology
15.
Traffic Inj Prev ; 22(3): 230-235, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33661065

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Composite road safety performance indicators (RSPIs) are useful tools in regional road safety planning. Among the indicators and data calculated by the World Health Organization (WHO), information on the effectiveness of law enforcement on various risk factors for road casualties were provided, which can be considered as qualitative indicators. The purpose of this study is to analyze the performance indicators related to the percentage of helmet and seat-belt use versus the qualitative enforcement scores attributed by WHO. METHODS: This analysis was performed for 30 member states of WHO and will show how and with what degree of efficiency the qualitative output of the enforcement score acts versus the input percentage of seat-belt and helmet use. The qualitative nature of the output index has led us to depart the traditional analysis of crisp numerical indicators related to road safety performance and to consider data as imprecise or fuzzy indices. In this study we used two methods including imprecise DEA-based CIs and fuzzy DEA-based CIs, respectively. RESULTS: Results show that the clear score achieved by the Imprecise DEA-based CI model is easy to interpret and use. Whereas, in the Fuzzy DEA-based CI model, the fuzzy indicator scores obtained based on the level of several probabilities are strong in capturing the uncertainties related to human behavior. CONCLUSIONS: Both RSPIs are applicable with slight differences that were in the order of countries and the ease of reading the results. We also found that each method has different strengths and that the FDEA-based CIs method is more accurate and more in line with the inputs than the IDEA-based CIs method.


Subject(s)
Automobile Driving/legislation & jurisprudence , Head Protective Devices/statistics & numerical data , Safety/legislation & jurisprudence , Seat Belts/statistics & numerical data , Accidents, Traffic , Automobile Driving/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Law Enforcement/methods , Risk Factors , Safety/statistics & numerical data , Seat Belts/legislation & jurisprudence , World Health Organization , Wounds and Injuries/prevention & control
16.
Traffic Inj Prev ; 22(3): 242-245, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33661080

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Electric scooters (e-scooters) are becoming increasingly common in major urban areas worldwide. Cities in some countries have even piloted programmes to promote their use to reduce general vehicular traffic. There have, however, been widespread media reports outlining concerns about their safety. We decided to investigate these concerns by reviewing the records of patients who presented to our center, a Level 1 Major Trauma Center in the United Kingdom, with orthopedic injuries associated with e-scooter use. METHODS: We reviewed the electronic medical records of all patients who presented to our center from January 2018 to January 2020 with e-scooter associated fractures. Demographic, injury, and surgical data were collected to characterize the types of e-scooter-related fractures and to investigate the frequency of such injuries over the duration of our search. A literature review of MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed to investigate specifically orthopedic injuries caused by electric scooter use. RESULTS: Six patients were identified (3 male, 3 female; mean age 35.43 years) who had sustained a variety of injuries. The presentation and clinical outcomes are presented. Three patients required operative management, and three patients were managed conservatively. CONCLUSION: This case series demonstrates an increasing frequency of significant orthopedic injury associated with e-scooter use treated at our center over the course of two years. This small series highlights an important problem given that this increase has occurred despite electric scooter usage in public spaces being illegal. Legalization might result in further increase in the incidence of injury.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data , Contusions/epidemiology , Fractures, Bone/epidemiology , Sprains and Strains/epidemiology , Adult , Cities/epidemiology , Female , Head Protective Devices/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Motor Vehicles , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , United Kingdom , Young Adult
17.
J Safety Res ; 76: 166-175, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33653548

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The U.S. experience with motorcycle helmets affords an important insight into the responses of adolescents to age-specific laws. Political contention has led to a number of U.S. state law changes back and forth between universal and age-specific laws. Because both kinds of law require adolescent motorcyclists to wear helmets, relatively few studies have focused on how the law type affects their behavior. METHOD: Differential behavior is tested by a systematic review of literature, leading to a meta-analysis, in relation to the experience of various states' motorcycle helmet laws. An electronic search was conducted for before-and-after studies in U.S. states that include data on adolescent helmet usage - both with a universally applicable motorcycle helmet law, and with an age-restricted law (usually, under-21 or under-18) - from observational, injury or fatality records for a certain period (e.g., 12 months) pre and post the state law change. RESULTS: The search yielded ten studies, including two that compared a set of age-specific law states with a set of universal law states over the same time period. Heterogeneity analysis of seven single-state studies with raw data revealed an acceptable fit for a random-effects model. Additional noncompliance with age-restricted laws was indicated by an attributable percentage among exposed of over 65% and odds ratio exceeding 4. CONCLUSIONS: About two-thirds of adolescent noncompliance with age-restricted motorcycle helmet usage laws disappears with universal applicability. Evidence from numerous international studies of youth reaction to helmet laws suggests that a large part of the greater compliance with universal laws is due to their conveying a more convincing message that helmets afford protection against injury. Practical Applications: The meta-analysis provides fresh, young-rider perspective on the continuing debate over motorcycle-helmet laws. Broader insight into adolescent psychology suggests considering alternatives to age-restricted laws more widely in safety and health policy.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data , Head Protective Devices/statistics & numerical data , Motorcycles/legislation & jurisprudence , Adolescent , Head Protective Devices/trends , Humans , United States
18.
N Z Med J ; 134(1530): 21-29, 2021 02 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33651774

ABSTRACT

AIM: E-scooters were introduced to New Zealand in 2018 as a means of city transport. Since their introduction, their use has resulted in high injury rates. No studies have directly compared e-scooters to other forms of transport. METHOD: The Auckland City Hospital trauma registry was retrospectively searched for patients admitted with an e-scooter injury. A comparison group of patients admitted with an injury secondary to cycling during the same period was collected. RESULTS: 178 patients were identified: 69 with e-scooter injuries and 109 with injuries sustained while cycling. The hospitalisation rate for e-scooter injuries was 326 hospitalisations per million hours. There was a significant difference found in blood ethanol levels (18.6 vs 6.4% positive, p-value=0.01), mechanism of injury (isolated falls: 87 vs 60.6%), time of injury (55.1 vs 40.4% between 5pm-8am) and protective gear use (worn in 10.1 vs 78.9%). No differences were found in injury severity, ICU admissions, length of stay or mortality. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates a concerningly high e-scooter-related hospitalisation rate and suggests e-scooters are currently not as safe as cycling. Strategies to improve e-scooter safety are needed and could include zero tolerance for alcohol, mandatory protective gear, restricted operating times and changes in road laws.


Subject(s)
Off-Road Motor Vehicles/statistics & numerical data , Play and Playthings/injuries , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Adult , Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Female , Head Protective Devices/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Urban , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , New Zealand/epidemiology , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Wounds and Injuries/etiology , Young Adult
19.
Am J Forensic Med Pathol ; 42(2): 141-146, 2021 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33346978

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: In recent years, there has been a significant increase in mortality among motorcyclists, which warrants a need to analyze the epidemiology and pattern of injuries among road users in Malaysia. Hence, prioritizing road safety in the government policy by implementing targeted actions is justified to reduce injury and fatality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cases of road accident deaths in motorcyclists received by UKM Medical Centre were studied over a period of 10 years, that is, between 2010 and 2019. This study was based on forensic autopsy records database and forensic autopsy. RESULTS: The most affected age group by road fatalities were young men. The most common injuries were intracranial hemorrhage (74%), thoracic hemorrhage (73%), and lung laceration (85.7%). About 39 (31%) fatally injured riders were positive for illicit drug and/or alcohol. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that men in the third decade of life are the major victims of motorcycle fatalities. Hence, urgent measures are necessary to establish road safety policy to reduce such fatalities.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Traffic/mortality , Motorcycles , Wounds and Injuries/mortality , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Driving Under the Influence/statistics & numerical data , Female , Head Protective Devices/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Malaysia/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Sex Distribution , Young Adult
20.
J Surg Res ; 259: 121-129, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33279837

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Downhill skiing accounts for a large portion of geriatric sport-related trauma. We assessed the national burden of geriatric versus nongeriatric ski trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adults presenting to level 1/2 trauma centers after ski-associated injuries from 2011 to 2015 were identified from the National Trauma Data Bank by ICD-9 code. We compared demographics, injury patterns, and outcomes between geriatric (age ≥65 y) and nongeriatric adult skiers (age 18-64 y). A multiple regression analysis assessed for risk factors associated with severe injury (Injury Severity Score >15). RESULTS: We identified 3255 adult ski trauma patients, and 16.7% (543) were geriatric. Mean ages for nongeriatric versus geriatric skiers were 40.8 and 72.1 y, respectively. Geriatric skiers more often suffered head (36.7 versus 24.3%, P < 0.0001), severe head (abbreviated injury scale score >3, 49.0 versus 31.5%, P < 0.0001) and thorax injuries (22.2 versus 18.1%, P = 0.03) as compared with nongeriatric skiers. Geriatric skiers were also more often admitted to the ICU (26.5 versus 14.9%, P < 0.0001), discharged to a facility (26.7 versus 11.6%, P < 0.0001), and suffered higher mortality rates (1.3 versus 0.4%, P = 0.004). Independent risk factors for severe injury included being male (OR: 1.68, CI: 1.22-2.31), helmeted (OR: 1.41, CI: 1.07-1.85), and having comorbidities (OR: 1.37, CI: 1.05-1.80). Geriatric age was not independently associated with severe injury. CONCLUSIONS: At level 1/2 trauma centers, geriatric age in ski trauma victims was associated with unique injury patterns, higher acuity, increased rates of facility care at discharge, and higher mortality as compared with nongeriatric skiers. Our findings indicate the need for specialized care after high impact geriatric ski trauma.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Craniocerebral Trauma/epidemiology , Skiing/injuries , Thoracic Injuries/epidemiology , Trauma Centers/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Comorbidity , Craniocerebral Trauma/diagnosis , Craniocerebral Trauma/etiology , Craniocerebral Trauma/prevention & control , Databases, Factual , Female , Head Protective Devices/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Skiing/statistics & numerical data , Thoracic Injuries/diagnosis , Thoracic Injuries/etiology , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...