Assessing hypertension care quality in Brazil: gender, race, and socioeconomic intersection in public and private services, 2013 and 2019 national health surveys.

We conducted a cross-sectional study of hypertension care in public and private services, analyzing gender, color, and socioeconomic status. Using data from the 2013 (n = 60,202) and 2019 (n = 90,846) national health surveys, hypertension prevalence increased from 21.4 to 23.9%. Quality of care declined from 41.7 to 35.4%, particularly in public services, disproportionately affecting low-income Black women. Poisson regression estimated prevalence ratios (PRs), with the lowest adjusted PR for high-quality care among low-income Black women. These findings highlight persistent health inequalities and the urgent need for intersectoral policies to promote health equity.

Disparities in Surgical Intervention and Health-Related Quality of Life Among Racial/Ethnic Groups With Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Racial and socioeconomic disparities in spine surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis persist in the United States, potentially contributing to unequal health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes. This is important as lumbar spondylolisthesis is one of the most common causes of surgical low back pain, and low back pain is the largest disabler of individuals worldwide. Our objective was to assess the relationship between race, socioeconomic factors, treatment utilization, and outcomes in patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis. METHODS: This cohort study analyzed prospectively collected data from 9941 patients diagnosed with lumbar spondylolisthesis between 2015 and 2020 at 5 academic hospitals. Exposures were race, socioeconomic status, health coverage, and HRQoL measures. Main outcomes and measures included treatment utilization rates between racial groups and the association between race and treatment outcomes using logistic regression, adjusting for patient characteristics, socioeconomic status, health coverage, and HRQoL measures. RESULTS: Of the 9941 patients included (mean [SD] age, 67.37 [12.40] years; 63% female; 1101 [11.1%] Black, Indigenous, and People of Color [BIPOC]), BIPOC patients were significantly less likely to use surgery than White patients (odds ratio [OR] = 0.68; 95% CI, 0.62-0.75). Furthermore, BIPOC race was associated with significantly lower odds of reaching the minimum clinically important difference for physical function (OR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.60; 0.91) and pain interference (OR = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.97). Medicaid beneficiaries were significantly less likely (OR = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46-0.92) to reach a clinically important improvement in HRQoL when accounting for race. CONCLUSION: This study found that BIPOC patients were less likely to use spine surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis despite reporting higher pain interference, suggesting an association between race and surgical utilization. These disparities may contribute to unequal HRQoL outcomes for patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis and warrant further investigation to address and reduce treatment disparities.

Racial Disparities in Clinical Outcomes of Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy: An Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample 2006 to 2018.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of race on in-hospital outcomes of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy using the National Inpatient Sample. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective study using data from the National Inpatient Sample database 2006 to 2018. We focused on Takotsubo cardiomyopathy hospitalizations, excluding those with acute coronary syndrome as the primary diagnosis. Two study groups consisted of White patients or Black patients. Univariate and multivariable logistic models evaluated race's effect on death, cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, length of stay, while adjusting for potential confounders. The Bayesian model averaging technique was used to further elucidate the factors influencing death within each racial group. Significant differences were observed between the 2 racial groups. Black patients presented at a younger age, had a higher proportion of men, a higher burden of comorbidities, and a lower median household income compared with their White counterparts. In the univariate model, the Black cohort showed an increased risk of cardiac arrest (odds ratio, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.15-1.82]). However, the difference did not reach statistical significance in the multivariable model. Black patients also had a significantly longer hospital stay in both the univariate model (risk ratio, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.22-1.31]) and the multivariable model (risk ratio, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.04-1.07]). No significant difference in all-cause death was observed between the racial groups. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome differences between 2 racial groups in our study are likely influenced by racial disparities in demographics, comorbidities, and socioeconomic factors. Individualized care based on racial group needs is crucial in clinical practice.

Risk factors underlying racial and ethnic disparities in tuberculosis diagnosis and treatment outcomes, 2011-19: a multiple mediation analysis of national surveillance data.

BACKGROUND: Despite an overall decline in tuberculosis incidence and mortality in the USA in the past two decades, racial and ethnic disparities in tuberculosis outcomes persist. We aimed to examine the extent to which inequalities in health and neighbourhood-level social vulnerability mediate these disparities. METHODS: We extracted data from the US National Tuberculosis Surveillance System on individuals with tuberculosis during 2011-19. Individuals with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis or missing data on race and ethnicity were excluded. We examined potential disparities in tuberculosis outcomes among US-born and non-US-born individuals and conducted a mediation analysis for groups with a higher risk of treatment incompletion (a summary outcome comprising diagnosis after death, treatment discontinuation, or death during treatment). We used sequential multiple mediation to evaluate eight potential mediators: three comorbid conditions (HIV, end-stage renal disease, and diabetes), homelessness, and four census tract-level measures (poverty, unemployment, insurance coverage, and racialised economic segregation [measured by Index of Concentration at the ExtremesRace-Income]). We estimated the marginal contribution of each mediator using Shapley values. FINDINGS: During 2011-19, 27 788 US-born individuals and 57 225 non-US-born individuals were diagnosed with active tuberculosis, of whom 27 605 and 56 253 individuals, respectively, met eligibility criteria for our analyses. We did not observe evidence of disparities in tuberculosis outcomes for non-US-born individuals by race and ethnicity. Therefore, subsequent analyses were restricted to US-born individuals. Relative to White individuals, Black and Hispanic individuals had a higher risk of not completing tuberculosis treatment (adjusted relative risk 1·27, 95% CI 1·19-1·35; 1·22, 1·11-1·33, respectively). In multiple mediator analysis, the eight measured mediators explained 67% of the disparity for Black individuals and 65% for Hispanic individuals. The biggest contributors to these disparities for Black individuals and Hispanic individuals were concomitant end-stage renal disease, concomitant HIV, census tract-level racialised economic segregation, and census tract-level poverty. INTERPRETATION: Our findings underscore the need for initiatives to reduce disparities in tuberculosis outcomes among US-born individuals, particularly in highly racially and economically polarised neighbourhoods. Mitigating the structural and environmental factors that lead to disparities in the prevalence of comorbidities and their case management should be a priority. FUNDING: US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and Tuberculosis Prevention Epidemiologic and Economic Modeling Agreement.

Health and social care experience and research perception of different ethnic minority populations in the East Midlands, United Kingdom (REPRESENT study).

INTRODUCTION: Ethnic minority populations experience significant health and social care disparities; despite experiencing a greater burden of diseases, these groups are underrepresented in health and social care research. Consequently, related research can be less applicable to these population groups. The REPRESENT study aims to explore the health and social care experiences of ethnic minorities and other minoritised populations, their research interests and appropriate research practices. METHODS: Focus groups and semistructured interviews were conducted between May and September 2022 with members of a number of ethnic minority communities in England. Data were audio recorded, transcribed and thematically coded using NVivo 12. Rigour was determined through extensive sampling, iterative data collection and analysis. FINDINGS: Fifty-two ethnic minority members were engaged in group interviews and one-to-one interviews. Participants included representatives of the following groups: African Caribbean, Eastern European, Gypsy Travellers, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Intersex and Asexual+, Refugee/Asylum Seekers, Somali and South Asian communities. Interviews were also conducted with ethnic minority healthcare providers and researchers. Three overarching categories were identified: health information, medical service experiences, health and social care concerns and health research. Health and social care services challenges were mostly attributed to discrimination, delayed services, poor cultural relevance and language and cultural barriers. The most influential information sources were local community organisations and word-of-mouth. The main health and social care concerns were chronic long-term health conditions, mental health, maternal health and child development. Recommendations for research involved understanding the motivations for participation, improving communication and empowering communities. Top research priorities were long-term health conditions, health promotion and education, early care interventions and understanding community needs. INTERPRETATION: Discrimination and bias in health and social care provision have severe implications for worsening ethnic health inequalities. Healthcare commissioning authorities and policymakers can leverage the preference of ethnic minority groups for pharmacy services and community organisations to improve access to care. Improving research interest and engagement requires understanding individual community needs, community sensitivity, research relevance and cultural appropriateness. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Members of ethnic minority Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement group and Community Advisory Board supported the REPRESENT study design, conceptualisation and report development.

Disparities in perioperative mortality outcomes between First Nations and non-First Nations peoples in Australia: protocol for a systematic review and planned meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Health inequities persist among First Nations people living in developed countries. Surgical care is pivotal in addressing a significant portion of the global disease burden. Evidence regarding surgical outcomes among First Nations people in Australia is limited. The perioperative mortality rate (POMR) indicates timely access to safe surgery and predicts long-term survival after major surgery. This systematic review will examine POMR among First Nations and non-First Nations peoples in Australia. METHODS: A systematic search strategy using MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, Global Health, and Scopus will identify studies that include First Nations people and non-First Nations people who underwent a surgical intervention under anaesthesia in Australia. The primary focus will be on documenting perioperative mortality outcomes. Title and abstract screening and full-text review will be conducted by independent reviewers, followed by data extraction and bias assessment using the ROBINS-E tool. Meta-analysis will be considered if there is sufficient homogeneity between studies. The quality of cumulative evidence will be evaluated following the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. DISCUSSION: This protocol describes the comprehensive methodology for the proposed systematic review. Evaluating disparities in perioperative mortality rates between First Nations and non-First Nations people remains essential in shaping the discourse surrounding health equity, particularly in addressing the surgical burden of disease. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021258970.

Interrogating and Uprooting Systemic Racism in the Emergency Department.

This Viewpoint discusses how recognizing systemic racism in emergency departments will allow for the mitigation of racial and ethnic disparities and promote equitable treatment for all patients.

Hospital Accreditation Status and Treatment Differences Among Black Patients With Colon Cancer.

Importance: Hospital-level factors, such as hospital type or volume, have been demonstrated to play a role in treatment disparities for Black patients with cancer. However, data evaluating the association of hospital accreditation status with differences in treatment among Black patients with cancer are lacking. Objective: To evaluate the association of Commission on Cancer (CoC) hospital accreditation status with receipt of guideline-concordant care and mortality among non-Hispanic Black patients with colon cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based cohort study used the National Program of Cancer Registries, which is a multicenter database with data from all 50 states and the District of Columbia, and covers 97% of the cancer population in the US. The participants included non-Hispanic Black patients aged 18 years or older diagnosed with colon cancer between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020. Race and ethnicity were abstracted from medical records as recorded by health care facilities and practitioners. The data were analyzed from December 7, 2023, to January 17, 2024. Exposure: CoC hospital accreditation. Main Outcome and Measures: Guideline-concordant care was defined as adequate lymphadenectomy during surgery for patients with stages I to III disease or chemotherapy administration for patients with stage III disease. Multivariable logistic regression models investigated associations with receipt of guideline-concordant care and Cox proportional hazards regression models assessed associations with 3-year cancer-specific mortality. Results: Of 17 249 non-Hispanic Black patients with colon cancer (mean [SD] age, 64.8 [12.8] years; 8724 females [50.6%]), 12 756 (74.0%; mean [SD] age, 64.7 [12.8] years) were treated at a CoC-accredited hospital and 4493 (26.0%; mean [SD] age, 65.1 [12.5] years) at a non-CoC-accredited hospital. Patients treated at CoC-accredited hospitals compared with those treated at non-CoC-accredited hospitals had higher odds of receiving guideline-concordant lymphadenectomy (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.89; 95% CI, 1.69-2.11) and chemotherapy (AOR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.97-2.72). Treatment at CoC-accredited hospitals was associated with lower cancer-specific mortality for patients with stages I to III disease who received surgery (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.76-0.98) and for patients with stage III disease eligible for chemotherapy (AHR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59-0.96). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of non-Hispanic Black patients with colon cancer, patients treated at CoC-accredited hospitals compared with those treated at non-CoC-accredited hospitals were more likely to receive guideline-concordant care and have lower mortality risk. These findings suggest that increasing access to high-quality guideline-concordant care at CoC-accredited hospitals may reduce variations in cancer treatment and outcomes for underserved populations.

Community level factors and racial inequities in delivery hospitalizations involving severe maternal morbidity in the United States, 2016-2019.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the racial and ethnic disparities in delivery hospitalizations involving severe maternal morbidity (SMM) by location of residence and community income. We used the 2016 to 2019 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample. International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes were used to identify delivery hospitalizations with SMM. Using logistic regression models, we examined the association between race and ethnicity and delivery hospitalizations involving SMM. In adjusted analyses, the models were stratified by location of residence and community income and adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics. In rural areas, non-Hispanic Black women (AOR 1.50; 95% CI 1.25-1.79) and women of other races (AOR 1.32; 95% CI 1.03-1.69) had an increased odds of experiencing a delivery hospitalization involving SMM when compared to non-Hispanic White women. In micropolitan areas, non-Hispanic Black women (AOR 1.88; 95% CI 1.79-1.97), non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander women (AOR 1.54; 95% CI 1.16-2.05), and women of other races (AOR 1.31; 95% CI 1.03-1.67) had an increased odds of experiencing a delivery hospitalization involving SMM when compared to non-Hispanic White women. Non-Hispanic Black women also had increased odds of experiencing a delivery hospitalization involving SMM in communities with the lowest income (quartile 1) (AOR 1.59; 95% CI 1.49-1.66), middle income (quartiles 2 and 3) (AOR 1.81; 95% CI 1.72-1.91), and highest income (AOR 2.09; 95% CI 1.90-2.29) when compared to non-Hispanic White women. We found that location of residence and community income are associated with racial and ethnic differences in SMM in the United States. These factors, outside of individual factors assessed in previous studies, provide a better understanding of some of the structural and systemic factors that may contribute to SMM.

Racial Disparities in Pulse Oximetry, in COVID-19 and ICU Settings.

OBJECTIVES BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the impact of race on pulse oximetry reliability, taking into account Spo2 ranges, COVID-19 diagnosis, and ICU admission. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study covering admissions from January 2020 to April 2024. SETTING: National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) database, consisting of electronic health records from 80 U.S. institutions. PATIENTS/SUBJECTS: Patients were selected from the N3C database based on the availability of data on self-identified race and both pulse oximetry estimated Spo2 and Sao2. Subgroups included patients in ICU and non-ICU settings, with or without a diagnosis of COVID-19 disease. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The agreement between Spo2 and Sao2 was assessed across racial groups (American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Black, Hispanic or Latino, Pacific Islander, and White). Each patient's initial Sao2 measurement was matched with the closest Spo2 values recorded within the preceding 10-minute time frame. The risk of hidden hypoxemia (Spo2 ≥ 88% but Sao2 < 88%) was determined for various Spo2 ranges, races, and clinical scenarios. We used a generalized logistic mixed-effects model to evaluate the impact of relevant variables, such as COVID-19, ICU admission, age, sex, race, and Spo2, on the risk of hidden hypoxemia, while accounting for the random effects within each hospital. A total of 80,541 patients were included, consisting of 596 American Indian or Alaska Native, 2,729 Asian, 11,889 Black, 13,154 Hispanic or Latino, 221 Pacific Islander, and 51,952 White individuals. Discrepancies between Spo2 and Sao2 were observed across all racial groups, with the most pronounced bias in Black patients. Hidden hypoxemia rates were higher in Black patients across all Spo2 subgroups, for all clinical scenarios. The odds of hidden hypoxemia were higher for Black and Hispanic or Latino patients and for those with COVID-19 disease. CONCLUSIONS: Race significantly impacts pulse oximetry reliability. Not only Black and Hispanic or Latino patients were at higher risk for hidden hypoxemia, but also those admitted with a COVID-19 diagnosis. Future in-depth explorations into the underlying causes and potential solutions are needed.

Parent and healthcare professional experiences of critical congenital heart disease in New Zealand to advance health equity.

BACKGROUND: Higher odds of survival have been reported in European infants compared to Indigenous Maori and Pasifika infants with critical congenital heart disease in New Zealand. We therefore aimed to understand how to mitigate this disparity by investigating the parent and healthcare professional experiences' of critical congenital heart disease healthcare in New Zealand. METHODS: A prospective qualitative study utilising semi-structured interviews was conducted on a cohort of purposefully sampled parents and health professionals with experience of critical congenital heart disease healthcare in New Zealand. Parents were recruited after a fetal critical congenital heart disease diagnosis and offered two interviews at least three months apart, whilst multidisciplinary fetal and cardiosurgical health professionals were interviewed once. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim before coding, categorization and qualitative analysis. RESULTS: During 2022 and 2023, 45 people participated in 57 interviews (25 parents: 19 mothers, 6 fathers; Indigenous Maori, n = 5; Pasifika, n = 6; Asian, n = 4; European, n = 10; and 20 healthcare professionals: European n = 17). The three lessons learned from participants were: (1) Minoritized groups experience disparate healthcare quality; (2) healthcare systems are under-resourced to provide equitable support for the differential needs of grieving parents; and (3) healthcare systems could engage minoritized families more optimally in shared decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: According to the experiences of parents and healthcare professionals, persisting inequities in CCHD healthcare quality occur by ethnic group, with the New Zealand healthcare system privileging European families. The concepts from this study could be translated by healthcare leaders, policymakers, and professionals into evidence-based healthcare system improvements to enhance experiences for non-European families more broadly.

Race and Ethnicity and Diagnostic Testing for Common Conditions in the Acute Care Setting.

Importance: Overuse of diagnostic testing is pervasive, but the extent to which it varies by race and ethnicity in the acute care setting is poorly understood. Objective: To use a previously validated diagnostic intensity index to evaluate differences in diagnostic testing rates by race and ethnicity in the acute care setting, which may serve as a surrogate for diagnostic test overuse. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a cross-sectional study of emergency department (ED) discharges, hospital observation stays, and hospital admissions using administrative claims among EDs and acute care hospitals in Kentucky, Maryland, North Carolina, and New Jersey, from 2016 through 2018. The diagnostic intensity index pairs nonspecific principal discharge diagnoses (nausea and vomiting, abdominal pain, chest pain, and syncope) with related diagnostic tests to estimate rates of nondiagnostic testing. Adults with an acute care encounter with a principal discharge diagnosis of interest were included. Data were analyzed from January to February 2024. Exposure: Race and ethnicity (Asian, Black, Hispanic, White, other [including American Indian, multiracial, and multiethnic], and missing). Main Outcomes and Measures: Receipt of a diagnostic test. Generalized linear models with a hospital-specific indicator variable were estimated to calculate the adjusted odds ratio of receiving a test related to the principal discharge diagnosis by race and ethnicity, controlling for primary payer and zip code income quartile. Results: Of 3 683 055 encounters (1 055 575 encounters [28.7%] for Black, 300 333 encounters [8.2%] for Hispanic, and 2 140 335 encounters [58.1%] for White patients; mean [SD] age of patients with encounters, 47.3 [18.8] years; 2 233 024 encounters among females [60.6%]), most (2 969 974 encounters [80.6%]) were ED discharges. Black compared with White patients discharged from the ED with a diagnosis of interest had an adjusted odds ratio of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.72-0.75) of having related diagnostic testing. No other racial or ethnic disparities of a similar magnitude were observed in any acute care settings. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, White patients discharged from the ED with a nonspecific diagnosis of interest were significantly more likely than Black patients to receive related diagnostic testing. The extent to which this represents diagnostic test overuse in White patients vs undertesting and missed diagnoses in Black patients deserves further study.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Providing Guideline-Concordant Care After Hip Fracture Surgery.

Importance: Institutions have adopted protocol-driven standardized hip fracture programs (SHFPs). However, concerns persist regarding bias in adherence to guideline-concordant care leading to disparities in implementing high-quality care for patients recovering from surgery for hip fracture. Objective: To assess disparities in the implementation of guideline-concordant care for patients after hip fracture surgery in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) Targeted Hip Fracture (THF) Database. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study was conducted using the ACS-NSQIP THF database from 2016 to 2021 for patients aged 65 years and older with hip fractures undergoing surgical fixation. Care outcomes of racial and ethnic minority patients (including American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Black or African American, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, or multiple races and Hispanic ethnicity) were compared with non-Hispanic White patients via risk difference, stratified by care institution SHFP status. Modified Poisson regression was used to measure interactions. Statistical analysis was performed from November 2022 to June 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes of interest encompassed weight-bearing as tolerated (WBAT) on postoperative day 1 (POD1), venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis, bone-protective medication, and the presence of SHFP at the institution. Results: Among 62 194 patients (mean [SD] age, 82.4 [7.3] years; 43 356 [69.7%] female) who met inclusion criteria and after multiple imputation, 11.2% (95% CI, 10.8%-11.5%) were racial and ethnic minority patients, 3.3% (95% CI, 3.1%-3.4%) were Hispanic patients, and 92.0% (95% CI, 91.7%-92.2%) were White. Receiving care at an institution with an SHFP was associated with improved likelihood of receiving guideline-concordant care for all patients to varying degrees across care outcomes. SHFP was associated with higher probability of being WBAT-POD1 (risk difference for racial and ethnic minority patients, 0.030 [95% CI, 0.004-0.056]; risk difference for non-Hispanic White patients, 0.037 [95% CI, 0.029-0.45]) and being prescribed VTE prophylaxis (risk difference for racial and ethnic minority patients, 0.066 [95% CI, 0.040-0.093]; risk difference for non-Hispanic White patients, 0.080 [95% CI, 0.071-0.089]), but SHFP was associated with the largest improvements in receipt of bone-protective medications (risk difference for racial and ethnic minority patients, 0.149 [95% CI, 0.121-0.178]; risk difference for non-Hispanic White patients, 0.181 [95% CI, 0.173-0.190]). While receiving care at an SHFP was associated with improved probability of receiving guideline-concordant care in both race and ethnicity groups, greater improvements were seen among non-Hispanic White patients compared with racial and ethnic minority patients. Conclusions and Relevance: Older adults who received care at an institution with an SHFP were more likely to receive guideline-concordant care (bone-protective medication, WBAT-POD1, and VTE prophylaxis), regardless of race and ethnicity. However, the probability of receiving guideline-concordant care at an institution with an SHFP increased more for non-Hispanic White patients than racial and ethnic minority patients.

Understanding Health Care Disparities Based on Medicare Use for Inflammatory and Infectious Eye Diseases.

Purpose: Inflammatory and infectious eye diseases are an important cause of visual impairment in patients older than 65 years of age. Health care disparities for eye care are present for general eye care. However, there is lack of national data on health disparities regarding eye care use for inflammatory and infectious eye diseases. Our study examines the effect of gender and race on eye care in patients with inflammatory and infectious eye diseases who are equal or greater than 65 years of age. Methods: We have used Medicare data to examine the effect gender and race on use of eye care services in patients with inflammatory and infectious eye diseases for 2014 to 2018. Medicare is a national insurance program administered by the government of United States to insure people age 65 years or older. Owing to its high enrollment, those in Medicare are representative of the U.S. population aged 65 and older. Results: We found that females have higher use for Medicare for inflammatory and infectious eye diseases across all races from 2014 to 2018. On examining the effect of race, African Americans have lower use as compared with Whites. People of Asian descent have the highest use, followed by Hispanic people. Conclusions: Health care disparities exist for eye care use for inflammatory and infectious eye diseases for patients 65 years of age and older. Future studies are required to address these disparities to provide equitable eye care. Translational Relevance: Identification of eye care disparities is the first step to addressing these disparities.

Understanding racial disparities in health care expenditures for cervical cancer.

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer demonstrates a notable efficacy in treatment, evidenced by a 92% 5-year survival rate among cases diagnosed at a localized stage. In 2020, the estimated annual national expenditure for cervical cancer care amounted to $2.3 billion in the United States. Limited real-world data are available for racial disparities in health care expenditures for cervical cancer. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate racial disparities associated with annual health care expenditures among patients diagnosed with cervical cancer in the United States. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study of annual health care expenditures in patients with cervical cancer diagnosed during 2014-2019 was performed using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data. In addition to the descriptive weighted analysis, an unadjusted analysis of the annual health care expenditure was conducted. An adjusted linear regression model with log transformation of the outcome variable was used to evaluate the total annual health care expenditure as well as expenditures by category across the racial groups. RESULTS: Overall, 826 patients with cervical cancer were identified from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey during 2014-2019. The majority were classified as White patients (81.2%) and in the age group of 45-64 years (44.65%). On average, the total annual health care expenditure was $11,537 (95% CI = $9,887-$13,186) among the White cohort, $10,659 (95% CI = $6,704-$14,614) among the African American cohort, and $8,726 (95% CI = $6,113-$11,340) among the Hispanic cohort. After adjusting for covariates, the average total annual health care expenditure for the Hispanic cohort was 35% of the total health care expenditure of the White cohort (P < 0.001) and 46% of the African American cohort's health care expenditure (P = 0.02). Specifically, adjusted costs of office-based and outpatient visits for the Hispanic cohort were 47% (P = 0.009) and 57% (P = 0.005) lower than for the White cohort, respectively. The total annual home health care expenditure for the African American cohort was 49% lower than White patients (P = 0.03), and the Hispanic cohort's total expenditure, excluding prescription medicines, was 57% lower than African American patients (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides valuable information regarding the health care disparities that need to be addressed among certain minority races. Reducing the disparities in health care spending across racial groups should be included as a crucial element in tackling well-established health care inequities.

THE ROLE OF HEALTH POLICY IN IMPROVING HEALTH OUTCOMES AND HEALTH EQUITY.

Despite higher per-capita health care spending than any other country, the United States lags far behind in health outcomes. Additionally, there are significant health inequities by race, ethnicity, socioeconomic position, and rurality. One set of potential solutions to improve these outcomes and reduce inequities is through health policy. Policy focused on improving access to care through insurance coverage, such as the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion, has led to better health and reduced mortality. Policy aimed at improving health care delivery, including value-based payment and alternative payment models, has improved quality of care but has had little impact on population health outcomes. Policies that influence broader issues of economic opportunity likely have a strong influence on health, but lack the evidence base of more targeted interventions. To advance health outcomes and equity, further policy change is crucial.

Provision of care for diabetic retinopathy in New Zealand: are there ethnic disparities?

AIMS: Ethnic disparities have been observed in treatment at first specialist appointments across various specialties within New Zealand. This study aimed to examine documentation and treatment decisions for diabetic retinopathy by ethnicity. METHODS: Retrospective audit of first specialist diabetic retinopathy clinic appointments for 388 patients at the Department of Ophthalmology, Te Whatu Ora Te Toka Tumai Auckland. Multiple domains of care were assessed, including comprehensiveness of history taking, examination, investigations and treatment decisions. RESULTS: Europeans comprised 42%, Maori only 9.5%, Pacific peoples 13.19%, Asian 32.7% and Middle Eastern/Latin American/African in 2%. Maori patients were eligible for a significantly greater number of treatments (p=0.001). The comprehensiveness of history taking (p=0.809), examination (p=0.513), investigations (p=0.623) and proportion of eligible treatments provided (p=0.788) was similar but did not reach the gold standard of care across all ethnicities. CONCLUSIONS: The standard of care provided in first specialist appointments for diabetic retinopathy appear to be similar across all ethnic groups, although Maori were underrepresented and had a higher disease burden at presentation. Our data highlights the need to reduce barriers faced by Maori in accessing GP, optometry and retinopathy screening referrals in Auckland, and improving local consultation and treatment guidelines.

¿No Hay Racismo?: application of the levels of racism framework to Latinx perspectives on barriers to health and wellbeing.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to increase understanding of the forms of systemic racism experienced by Latinx communities in North Carolina during the COVID-19 pandemic as identified by Latinx community health workers (CHWs) and community-based organization (CBO) leaders. METHODS: We held three focus groups in July 2022 (N = 16) with CHWs and CBO leaders in Spanish to discuss policy and community interventions that improved access to resources during the COVID-19 pandemic; policy or community interventions needed to improve care of Latinx communities; and lessons learned to improve the health of Latinx communities in the future. We performed directed and summative qualitative content analysis of the data in the original language using the Levels of Racism Framework by Dr. Camara Jones to identify examples of implicitly and explicitly discussed forms of systemic racism. RESULTS: Latinx CHWs and CBO leaders implicitly discussed numerous examples of all levels of racism when seeking and receiving health services, such as lack of resources for undocumented individuals and negative interactions with non-Latinx individuals, but did not explicitly name racism. Themes related to institutionalized racism included: differential access to resources due to language barriers; uninsured or undocumented status; exclusionary policies not accounting for cultural or socioeconomic differences; lack of action despite need; and difficulties obtaining sustainable funding. Themes related to personally-mediated racism included: lack of cultural awareness or humility; fear-inciting misinformation targeting Latinx populations; and negative interactions with non-Latinx individuals, organizations, or institutions. Themes related to internalized racism included: fear of seeking information or medical care; resignation or hopelessness; and competition among Latinx CBOs. Similarly, CHWs and CBO leaders discussed several interventions with systems-level impact without explicitly mentioning policy or policy change. CONCLUSION: Our research demonstrates community-identified examples of racism and confirms that Latinx populations often do not name racism explicitly. Such language gaps limit the ability of CHWs and CBOs to highlight injustices and limit the ability of communities to advocate for themselves. Although generally COVID-19 focused, themes identified represent long-standing, systemic barriers affecting Latinx communities. It is therefore critical that public and private policymakers consider these language gaps and engage with Latinx communities to develop community-informed anti-racist policies to sustainably reduce forms of racism experienced by this unique population.

Association of Race and Ethnicity and Social Factors With Postpartum Primary Care or Cardiology Follow-Up Visits Among Individuals With Preeclampsia.

BACKGROUND: Preeclampsia is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and death. Primary care or cardiology follow-up, in complement to routine postpartum obstetric care, provides an essential opportunity to address cardiovascular risk. Prior studies investigating racial differences in the recommended postpartum follow-up have incompletely assessed the influence of social factors. We hypothesized that racial and ethnic differences in follow-up with a primary care provider or cardiologist would be modified by income and education. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified adult individuals with preeclampsia (September 2014 to September 2019) in a national administrative database. We compared occurrence of a postpartum visit with a primary care provider or cardiologist within 1 year after delivery by race and ethnicity using multivariable logistic regression models. We examined whether education or income modified the association between race and ethnicity and the likelihood of follow-up. Of 18 050 individuals with preeclampsia (aged 31.8±5.7 years), Black individuals (11.7%) had lower odds of primary care provider or cardiology follow-up within 1 year after delivery compared with White individuals (adjusted odds ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.70-0.85]) as did Hispanic individuals (14.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.73-0.87]). Black and Hispanic individuals with higher educational attainment were more likely to have follow-up than those with lower educational attainment (P for interaction=0.033) as did those in higher income brackets (P for interaction=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: We identified racial and ethnic differences in primary care or cardiology follow-up in the year postpartum among individuals diagnosed with preeclampsia, a disparity that may be modified by social factors. Enhanced system-level interventions are needed to reduce barriers to follow-up care.

Neighborhood-Level Disparities in Hypertension Prevalence and Treatment Among Middle-Aged Adults.

Importance: Hypertension in middle-aged adults (35-50 years) is associated with poorer health outcomes in late life. Understanding how hypertension varies by race and ethnicity across levels of neighborhood disadvantage may allow for better characterization of persistent disparities. Objective: To evaluate spatial patterns of hypertension diagnosis and treatment by neighborhood socioeconomic position and racial and ethnic composition. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cross-sectional study of middle-aged adults in Cuyahoga County, Ohio, who encountered primary care in 2019, geocoded electronic health record data were linked to the area deprivation index (ADI), a neighborhood disadvantage measure, at the US Census Block Group level (ie, neighborhood). Neighborhoods were stratified by ADI quintiles, with the highest quintile indicating the most disadvantage. Data were analyzed between August 7, 2023, and June 1, 2024. Exposure: Essential hypertension. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a clinician diagnosis of essential hypertension. Spatial analysis was used to characterize neighborhood-level patterns of hypertension prevalence and treatment. Interaction analysis was used to compare hypertension prevalence by racial and ethnic group within similar ADI quintiles. Results: A total of 56 387 adults (median [IQR] age, 43.1 [39.1-46.9] years; 59.8% female) across 1157 neighborhoods, which comprised 3.4% Asian, 31.1% Black, 5.5% Hispanic, and 60.0% White patients, were analyzed. A gradient of hypertension prevalence across ADI quintiles was observed, with the highest vs lowest ADI quintile neighborhoods having a higher hypertension rate (50.7% vs 25.5%) and a lower treatment rate (61.3% vs 64.5%). Of the 315 neighborhoods with predominantly Black (>75%) patient populations, 200 (63%) had a hypertension rate greater than 35% combined with a treatment rate of less than 70%; only 31 of 263 neighborhoods (11.8%) comprising 5% or less Black patient populations met this same criterion. Compared with a spatial model without covariates, inclusion of ADI and percentage of Black patients accounted for 91% of variation in hypertension diagnosis prevalence among men and 98% among women. Men had a higher prevalence of hypertension than women across race and ADI quintiles, but the association of ADI and hypertension risk was stronger in women. Sex prevalence differences were smallest between Black men and women, particularly in the highest ADI quintile (1689 [60.0%] and 2592 [56.0%], respectively). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings show an association between neighborhood deprivation and hypertension prevalence, with disparities observed particularly among Black patients, emphasizing a need for structural interventions to improve community health.