Fractionated plasma separation and adsorption integrated with continuous veno-venous hemofiltration in patients with acute bipyridine herbicide poisoning.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of fractionated plasma separation and adsorption combined with continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (FPSA-CVVH) treatment in patients with acute bipyridine herbicide poisoning. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 18 patients with acute bipyridine herbicide poisoning was conducted, of which 9 patients were poisoned by diquat and 9 patients by paraquat. All patients underwent FPSA-CVVH treatment. The serum cytokine levels in pesticide-poisoned patients were assessed. The efficacy of FPSA-CVVH in eliminating cytokines, the 90-d survival rate of poisoned patients, and adverse reactions to the treatment were observed. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (77.8%) had acute kidney injuries and 10 (55.6%) had acute liver injuries. The serum cytokine levels of high mobility group protein B-1 (HMGB-1), interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-8, interferon-inducible protein-10 (IP-10), monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), and macrophage inflammatory protein-1ß (MIP-1ß) were significantly elevated. A total of 41 FPSA-CVVH treatment sessions were administered. After a single 8-h FPSA-CVVH treatment, the decreases in HMGB-1, IL-6, IL-8, IP-10, MCP-1, and MIP-1ß were 66.0%, 63.5%, 73.3%, 63.7%, 53.9%, and 54.1%, respectively. During FPSA-CVVH treatment, one patient required a filter change due to coagulation in the plasma component separator, and one experienced a bleeding adverse reaction. The 90-d patient survival rate was 50%, with 4 patients with diquat poisoning and 5 patients with paraquat poisoning, and both liver and kidney functions were restored to normal. CONCLUSION: Cytokine storms may play a significant role in the progression of multiorgan dysfunction in patients with acute bipyridine herbicide poisoning. FPSA-CVVH can effectively reduce cytokine levels, increase the survival rate of patients with acute bipyridine herbicide poisoning, and decrease the incidence of adverse events.

Preclinical and first-in-human safety studies on a novel magnetism-based haemofiltration method.

Extracorporeal haemofiltration devices that selectively remove cytokines could represent an adjunctive treatment in inflammatory diseases. One such device is the "IL-6-Sieve", wherein magnetic Anti-IL-6 Beads are introduced into an extracorporeal circuit via a Bead Adapter and then removed along with any surface-bound interleukin (IL)-6 by a Filter deployed in a Magnet, before the blood is returned to the patient. We report here on a series of animal studies, and a first-in-human study, on the safety of the IL-6-Sieve. Evaluations focused on the: (a) safety of Filter and Magnet placed in an extracorporeal circuit in sheep; (b) safety of Anti-IL-6 Beads-directly infused intravenously as worst case scenario of misuse; or injected into an extracorporeal circuit using the Bead Adapter, Filter, and Magnet as intended-in sheep; (c) biodistribution of Anti-IL-6 Beads intravenously infused in mice; and (d) safety of Filter and Magnet placed in an extracorporeal circuit in healthy volunteers. No serious adverse events or significant changes in vital signs or routine laboratory parameters occurred in any of the animals or humans. Although safety of the IL-6-Sieve requires further study, these initial evaluations represent a promising start for the translation of this new blood purification modality into clinical use.

Survival benefit of resin cartridge extracorporeal blood purification therapy in patients with septic shock.

Background/aim: Extracorporeal blood purification (EBP) therapies have shown promise as potential rescue treatments for patients with septic shock. However, precise evidence regarding their effectiveness is lacking. This case-control study aimed to evaluate the 28-day survival benefit of a resin cartridge-based EBP therapy compared to conventional therapies in patients with septic shock. Materials and methods: The study sample was collected retrospectively from the medical records of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) between 2015 and 2020. The study included patients with septic shock aged ≥18 years who had ICU stays >96 h and excluded those lost to follow-up by 28 days or readmitted. First, 28-day survival was compared between EBP patients and 1:1 matched conventionally treated controls. Second, the EBP patients were evaluated for clinical and laboratory improvements within 72 h of EBP therapy. Results: Of 3742 patients, 391 were included in this study, of whom 129 received EBP therapy and had a 28-day survival rate of 44%, compared to 262 matched controls who received conventional therapy alone and had a survival rate of 33% (p = 0.001, log-rank = 0.05, number needed to treat = 8, and odds ratio = 1.7). After receiving EBP therapy for 72 h, improvements were observed in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores (p < 0.05), shock indices (p < 0.05), partial pressure of oxygen in the arterial blood to the fraction of inspiratory oxygen concentration ratios (p < 0.001), vasopressor requirements (p < 0.001), pH (p < 0.05), lactate levels (p < 0.001), and C-reactive protein levels (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The findings suggest that administering resin cartridge-based EBP therapy to patients with septic shock may improve their survival compared to conventional therapies.

Septic Hyperinflammation-Is There a Role for Extracorporeal Blood Purification Techniques?

This manuscript investigates the role of extracorporeal blood purification techniques in managing septic hyperinflammation, a critical aspect of sepsis characterized by an uncontrolled immune response leading to multiorgan dysfunction. We provide an overview of sepsis, focusing on the dynamics of immune response, the involvement of neutrophils, and the role of the endothelium in the disease's progression. It evaluates the effectiveness of various blood purification methods, including high-cut-off membranes, high-volume hemofiltration, adsorption techniques, and albumin dialysis, in removing cytokines and endotoxin and improving hemodynamic stability. Despite some very promising results, we conclude that the current evidence does not strongly support these techniques in significantly improving survival rates in septic patients, clearly underlining the need for further research.

Effects of haemodiafiltration or haemofiltration compared with haemodialysis on prognosis in patients with end-stage renal disease: protocol an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials with trial sequential analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Haemodialysis is the most common treatment option for patients with life-sustaining end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). In recent years, haemodiafiltration or haemofiltration has been widely used in patients with ESKD, and there are still conflicting findings as to whether both are superior to traditional haemodialysis. This systematic review and meta-analysis were designed to determine whether haemodiafiltration or haemofiltration is more effective than haemodialysis in reducing all-cause mortality risk in patients with ESKD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will perform a systematic PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library and Scopus search, including studies published before September 2023. Randomised controlled trials will be included exploring the effects of haemodiafiltration or haemofiltration compared with haemodialysis on prognosis in patients with ESKD. Outcomes of interest include all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, dialysis adequacy and adverse effects. The Cochrane Collaboration tools (ROB-2) will assess the bias risk. Available data will be used to calculate effect sizes. Heterogeneity between studies will be evaluated with I2. The trial sequential analysis will be used to eliminate false-positive results. The certainty of the evidence will be assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systematic review and meta-analysis was deemed exempt from ethics review. Results will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and research conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023464509.

Development of a new miniaturized system for ultrafiltration.

Acute decompensated heart failure and fluid overload are the most common causes of hospitalization in heart failure patients, and often, they contribute to disease progression. Initial treatment encompasses intravenous diuretics although there might be a percentual of patients refractory to this pharmacological approach. New technologies have been developed to perform extracorporeal ultrafiltration in fluid overloaded patients. Current equipment allows to perform ultrafiltration in most hospital and acute care settings. Extracorporeal ultrafiltration is then prescribed and conducted by specialized teams, and fluid removal is planned to restore a status of hydration close to normal. Recent clinical trials and European and North American practice guidelines suggest that ultrafiltration is indicated for patients with refractory congestion not responding to medical therapy. Close interaction between nephrologists and cardiologists may be the key to a collaborative therapeutic effort in heart failure patients. Further studies are today suggesting that wearable technologies might become available soon to treat patients in ambulatory and de-hospitalized settings. These new technologies may help to cope with the increasing demand for the care of chronic heart failure patients. Herein, we provide a state-of-the-art review on extracorporeal ultrafiltration and describe the steps in the development of a new miniaturized system for ultrafiltration, called AD1 (Artificial Diuresis).

A single-center experience of non-bioartificial DFAPP support systems among Chinese patients with hyperlipidemic moderate/severe acute pancreatitis.

To assess the clinical efficacy of Double Filtration Plasmapheresis (DFAPP), a novel blood purification method, in treating hyperlipidemic moderate/severe pancreatitis (HL-M/SAP). A total of 68 HL-M/SAP patients were enrolled in this study. The observation group, comprising 34 patients, received DFAPP treatment, while the control group underwent CVVH + PA treatment. We compared the efficacy changes between the two groups post-treatment. Patients treated with DFAPP showed significant improvements in clinical outcomes. After 72 h of DFAPP treatment, HL-M/SAP patients exhibited notably lower multiple organ failure scores and a reduced mortality rate compared to those in the CVVH + PA group. Triglyceride levels in HL-M/SAP patients treated with DFAPP for 48 h averaged 3.75 ± 1.95, significantly lower than the 9.57 ± 3.84 levels in the CVVH + PA group (P < 0.05). Moreover, CRP levels decreased markedly, IL-17 levels diminished, IL-10 levels increased, and the decline in IL-35 levels was significantly less pronounced compared to the CVVH + PA group. The recurrence rate of pancreatitis was also significantly lower after 6 months. The early implementation of DFAPP in HL-M/SAP patients effectively reduces triglyceride levels, suppresses pro-inflammatory factors, enhances anti-inflammatory factors, and mitigates cytokine storm-induced sepsis damage. Consequently, this leads to a decrease in the incidence of multiple organ failure, improved patient survival rates, and a reduce the recurrence rate of lipogenic pancreatitis.Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2300076066.

Neurocognitive Function with Conventional Hemodialysis versus Post-Dilution Hemofiltration as Initial Treatment in ESKD Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial - The DA-VINCI Study.

INTRODUCTION: The ideal modality choice and dialysis prescription during the first renal replacement therapy (RRT) session remain unclear. We conducted a pilot study to determine the safety risk for hemodialysis (HD) versus hemofiltration (HF) and its relationship with neurocognitive assessment on incident RRT patients. METHODS: Twenty-four incident RRT patients were included. Patients were randomized to the conventional HD group or post-dilution HF group. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) tests were applied in all patients before and after session, and brain magnetic resonance image (MRI) was performed in 7 patients from the conventional HD group and 8 patients from the post-dilution HF group before and after the intervention. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Compared to conventional HD, post-dilution HF had longer treatment time. There were no significant changes in blood pressure after RRT in both groups. The MMSE test showed no significant differences between groups or within groups. The MOCA test showed an increase in the total score for the post-dilution HF group with no significant changes between groups. The MRI evaluation showed no differences between or within groups. CONCLUSION: Post-dilution HF is a safe alternative for the first HD session in incident RRT; it allows longer treatment time if ultrafiltration is required and has a similar neurological risk than conventional HD. This is a pilot study and that larger studies are needed to confirm the findings.

Extracorporeal Techniques in Kidney Failure.

During the last decades, various strategies have been optimized to enhance clearance of a variable spectrum of retained molecules to ensure hemodynamic tolerance to fluid removal and improve long-term survival in patients affected by kidney failure. Treatment effects are the result of the interaction of individual patient characteristics with device characteristics and treatment prescription. Historically, the nephrology community aimed to provide adequate treatment, along with the best possible quality of life and outcomes. In this article, we analyzed blood purification techniques that have been developed with their different characteristics.

Hemodiafiltración con reinfusión endógena del ultrafiltrado (HFR): hacia una diálisis convectiva, difusiva y adsortiva / Hemodiafiltration with endogenous reinfusion of the regenerated ultrafiltrate (HFR): Towards a convective, diffusive, and adsorptive dialysis

La hemodiafiltración con reinfusión endógena del ultrafiltrado (HFR) es una técnica de diálisis caracterizada por un cartucho de resina con poder adsorbente que combina los mecanismos difusión, convección y adsorción en un solo esquema terapéutico. Después de cerca de 20 años de experiencia clínica con HFR, el presente artículo revisa la evidencia acumulada con esta técnica, planteando si la adición de la adsorción, como tercer mecanismo depurativo, debería ser el siguiente paso en el tratamiento de los pacientes en hemodiálisis. La HFR, a pesar de producir una extensa eliminación de toxinas urémicas, ha demostrado reducir la pérdida de nutrientes y componentes fisiológicos durante la sesión de diálisis frente a la hemodiafiltración on-line, mitigando el estado inflamatorio y el estrés oxidativo en esta población. Además de su facilidad de uso, la técnica también es altamente biocompatible y puede utilizarse en situaciones de un acceso vascular comprometido. En base a estas observaciones, la HFR parece ser una técnica especialmente útil para pacientes con elevada comorbilidad, incluyendo aquellos con fragilidad, desnutrición o enfermedad cardiovascular. En esta revisión, como panel de consenso de nefrólogos con experiencia clínica en HFR, examinamos la literatura existente y resumimos nuestros puntos de vista sobre cómo usar esta técnica, qué perfil de paciente puede ser más adecuado para la HFR, y cómo prescribir y monitorizar de manera práctica esta modalidad de diálisis (AU)

Hemodiafiltration with endogenous reinfusion of the ultrafiltrate (HFR) is a dialysis technique characterized by a resin cartridge with adsorptive properties that combines the mechanisms of diffusion, convection, and adsorption in a single therapeutic regimen. After nearly 20 years of clinical experience with HFR, this article reviews the accumulated evidence with this technique, considering whether adsorption reduction, as a third purification mechanism, should be the next step in the treatment of hemodialysis patients. HFR, beyond producing an extensive removal of uremic toxins, has demonstrated to reduce the loss of nutrients and other physiological components during the dialysis session as compared to online hemodiafiltration, ameliorating the inflammatory state and oxidative stress in this population. In addition to its ease of use, the technique is also highly biocompatible and can be used in patients with a compromised vascular access. Based on these observations, HFR appears to be an especially useful therapy for high-comorbidity patients, including those with frailty, malnutrition, or cardiovascular disease. In this review, we, as a consensus panel of nephrologists experienced with HFR, survey existing literature and summarize our views on when to use this technique, which patients may be best suited for HFR, and how to effectively prescribe and monitor this modality of dialysis in daily clinical practice (AU)

Membrane-based therapeutic plasma exchange: Proposed techniques for preventing filter failure.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is commonly performed using membrane-based TPE (mTPE) and is prone to filter failure. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We report on 46 patients, with a total of 321 mTPE treatments using the NxStage machine. This was a retrospective study with an aim to evaluate the effect of heparin, pre-filter saline dilution and the impact of total plasma volume exchanged (< 3 L vs. ≥3 L) on the rate of filter failure. Primary outcome was the overall rate of filter failure. Secondary outcomes included factors that may have indirectly influenced the rate of filter failure, including hematocrit, platelet count, replacement fluid (Fresh Frozen Plasma vs. albumin), and access type. RESULTS: We found that treatments that received both pre-filter heparin and saline had a statistically significant decrease in filter failure rate as compared to those that received neither (28.6% vs. 5.3%, P = .001), and compared to the treatments that received pre-filter heparin alone (14.2% vs. 5.3%, P = .015). In treatments that received both pre-filter heparin and saline predilution, we noted a significantly higher filter failure rate when the plasma volume exchanged was ≥3 L as compared to those that had <3 L exchanged (12.2% vs. 0.9%, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Rate of filter failure in mTPE can be reduced by implementing several therapeutic interventions including pre-filter heparin and pre-filter saline solution. These interventions were not associated with any clinically significant adverse events. Despite the above-mentioned interventions, large plasma volume exchanges of ≥3 L can negatively impact filter life.

Hemoadsorption: Research Agenda and Potential Future Applications.

After initial tentative steps with bioincompatible sorbents, hemoadsorption is making a comeback. This has been fueled by improved coating technology and improved sorbent technology. Both have markedly increased the safety, biocompatibility, and efficiency of hemoadsorption. Despite such development and an emerging body of evidence, the research agenda for hemoadsorption is substantial and, in most ways, unfulfilled. In this chapter, we highlight the need for more extensive and sophisticated work to understand the biological effect of hemoadsorption in key areas (especially sepsis). We also explain why more technical research needs to be conducted ex vivo and in large animals to understand the performance characteristics of hemoadsorption sorbent cartridge, including optimal blood flow, optimal anticoagulation, and optimal duration of application. Finally, we focus on the need to develop registries of the use of this technique so that more extensive information can be obtained about current use and real-world performance.

A simplified protocol of regional citrate anticoagulation with phosphate-containing solutions in infants and children treated with continuous kidney replacement therapy.

BACKGROUND: Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) is the preferred modality of anticoagulation used in continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) in adults and less extensively in children. Potential metabolic complications limit widespread use in infants, neonates, and in children with liver failure. METHODS: We report our experience with a simplified protocol in 50 critically ill children, infants, and neonates, some of them with liver failure, with commercially available solutions containing phosphorous and higher concentration of potassium and magnesium. RESULTS: RCA allowed attainment of a mean filter lifetime of 54.5 ± 18.2 h, 42.5% of circuits lasted more than 70 h, and scheduled change was the most frequent cause of CKRT interruption. Patient Ca++ and circuit Ca++ were maintained in the target range with mean values of 1.15 ± 0.13 mmol/l and 0.38 ± 0.07 mmol/l, respectively. No session had to be stopped because of metabolic complications. The most frequent complications were hyponatremia, hypomagnesemia, and metabolic acidosis mostly related to primary disease and critical illness. No session had to be stopped because of citrate accumulation (CA). Transitory CA occurred in 6 patients and was managed without requiring RCA interruption. No patients with liver failure presented CA episodes. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, RCA with commercially available solutions was easily applied and managed in critically ill children, even in patients with low weight or with liver failure. Solutions containing phosphate and higher concentrations of magnesium and potassium allowed reduction of metabolic derangement during CKRT. Prolonged filter life was ensured with no detrimental effects on patients and reduced staff workload. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Simplified regional citrate anticoagulation protocol for CVVH, CVVHDF and SLED focused on the prevention of KRT-related hypophosphatemia while optimizing acid-base balance.

BACKGROUND: Hypophosphatemia is a common electrolyte disorder in critically ill patients undergoing prolonged kidney replacement therapy (KRT). We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a simplified regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) protocol for continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH), continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) and sustained low-efficiency dialysis filtration (SLED-f). We aimed at preventing KRT-related hypophosphatemia while optimizing acid-base equilibrium. METHODS: KRT was performed by the Prismax system (Baxter) and polyacrylonitrile AN69 filters (ST 150, 1.5 m2, Baxter), combining a 18 mmol/L pre-dilution citrate solution (Regiocit 18/0, Baxter) with a phosphate-containing solution (HPO42- 1.0 mmol/L, HCO3- 22.0 mmol/L; Biphozyl, Baxter). When needed, phosphate loss was replaced with sodium glycerophosphate pentahydrate (Glycophos™ 20 mmol/20 mL, Fresenius Kabi Norge AS, Halden, Norway). Serum citrate measurements were scheduled during each treatment. We analyzed data from three consecutive daily 8-h SLED-f sessions, as well as single 72-h CVVH or 72-h CVVHDF sessions. We used analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures to evaluate differences in variables means (i.e. serum phosphate, citrate). Because some patients received phosphate supplementation, we performed analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) for repeated measures modelling phosphate supplementation as a covariate. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) or end stage kidney disease (ESKD) requiring KRT were included [11 CVVH, 11 CVVHDF and 25 SLED-f sessions; mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score 25 ± 7.0]. Interruptions for irreversible filter clotting were negligible. The overall incidence of hypophosphatemia (s-P levels <2.5 mg/dL) was 6.6%, and s-P levels were kept in the normality range irrespective of baseline values and the KRT modality. The acid-base balance was preserved, with no episode of citrate accumulation. CONCLUSIONS: Our data obtained with a new simplified RCA protocol suggest that it is effective and safe for CVVH, CVVHDF and SLED, allowing to prevent KRT-related hypophosphatemia and maintain the acid-base balance without citrate accumulation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03976440 (registered 6 June 2019).

Adsorption and Clearance of the Novel Fluorescent Tracer Agent MB-102 During Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: In Vitro Results.

MB-102 is a novel fluorescent tracer agent that is exclusively removed from the body by glomerular filtration. This agent can be detected transdermally to provide a real-time measurement of glomerular filtration rate at the point-of-care and is currently in clinical studies for such. MB-102 clearance during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is unknown. Its plasma protein binding (~0%), molecular weight (~372 Da) and volume of distribution (15-20 L) suggest that it may be removed by renal replacement therapies. To determine the disposition of MB-102 during CRRT, an in vitro study assessing the transmembrane clearance (CL TM ) and adsorptive clearance of MB-102 was conducted. A validated in vitro bovine blood continuous hemofiltration (HF) and continuous hemodialysis (HD) models were performed using two types of hemodiafilters to evaluate CL TM of MB-102. For HF, three different ultrafiltration rates were evaluated. For HD, four different dialysate flow rates were evaluated. Urea was used as a control. No MB-102 adsorption to the CRRT apparatus or either of hemodiafilters was observed. MB-102 is readily removed by HF and HD. Dialysate and ultrafiltrate flow rates directly influence MB-102 CLTM. Hence MB-102 CLTM should be measurable for critically ill patients receiving CRRT.

Ceftaroline and Avibactam Removal by Continuous Renal Replacement Therapies: An in vitro Study.

INTRODUCTION: Continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRTs) are frequently used in critically ill patients; however, there are scarce in vitro and in vivo studies showing the extracorporeal elimination of ceftaroline and avibactam. The aim of this study was to assess, through an in vitro model, the extracorporeal elimination of ceftaroline and avibactam by continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH), continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF), and continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (CVVHD), using a polysulfone hemofilter. METHODS: Simulated in vitro experiments were performed using a multiFiltrate machine with a 1.4 m2 Ultraflux® AV600S polysulfone hemofilter. Isofundin® without or with bovine serum albumin was circulated as vehicle for ceftaroline or avibactam. Pre-filter, post-filter, and effluent samples were taken over a period of 60 min, and they were immediately stored at 4°C until processed in the same day. The quantification of ceftaroline and avibactam in the samples was performed by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. Protein binding, extraction coefficient (EC), and extracorporeal clearance (CLCRRT) were calculated. RESULTS: The elimination of both ceftaroline and avibactam during the three extracorporeal modalities followed first-order pharmacokinetics. Regardless of the CRRT technique, EC values for both molecules were around 1, similar to the unbound fraction of avibactam (0.96) and higher than the unbound fraction of ceftaroline (0.79). CLCRRT of ceftaroline ranged from 15.63 to 17.66 mL/min when CVVH and CVVHD were used with a flow rate of 1,000 mL/h, and from 29.25 to 32.95 mL/min for the CVVHDF modality with a flow rate of 2,000 mL/h. For avibactam, CLCRRT ranged from 15.07 to 18.82 mL/min for CVVH and CVVHD, and from 33.74 to 34.13 mL/min for CVVHDF. DISCUSSION: Avibactam and ceftaroline are extensively removed through the polysulfone membrane, and a dose adjustment may be recommended for patients under CRRT to ensure pharmacodynamic target achievement.

[Effect and safety of double plasma molecular absorption in treatment of patients with severe wasp stings injury: a multicenter historical cohort study].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect and safety of continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH)+double plasma molecular absorption (DPMA)+hemoperfusion (HP), CVVH+HP, and CVVH+plasma exchange (PE) in treatment of patient with severe wasp stings injury. METHODS: Multicenter, historical cohort study and superiority test were used. From July 2020 to October 2022, patients with wasp sting injury and multiple organ damage admitted to the intensive care units (ICU) of five hospitals were consecutively screened and recruited into the CVVH+DPMA+HP group (intervention group). Propensity score matching was used to establish historical cohorts. Patients with severe wasp sting injury who hospitalized from January 2016 to June 2020 in each ICU were collected and matched 1:1 with the intervention group, and divided into CVVH+HP group and CVVH+PE group according to their actual hemopurification protocols (historical control groups). The primary outcome was the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score on days 3 and 7 after initiation of treatment. Secondary outcomes included complications, length of ICU and hospital stays, and all-cause mortality. Multivariate Cox proportional risk regression was used to analyze the prognosis of patients. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 56 patients in intervention group and each of the two historical control groups were matched successfully. There were no significant differences in age, gender, comorbidities, biochemical test indices and critical illness scores among the groups. After treatment, APACHE II score markedly declined in all groups, and the decrease was faster in the intervention group; treatment with DPMA [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.04, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 1.02-1.08, P = 0.00], the decreased levels of body temperature (HR = 1.02, 95%CI was 1.00-1.03, P = 0.02), serum creatine kinase (CK; HR = 0.98, 95%CI was 0.96-1.00, P = 0.05) and myoglobin (MYO; HR = 2.88, 95%CI was 1.24-6.69, P = 0.01) were independent risk factors for APACHE II score decline to the target value (15 scores). There were no significant differences in the incidence of bleeding complications, filter or perfusion thrombosis, blood pressure reduction, catheter-related infection and anaphylaxis among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: CVVH+DPMA+HP regimen can significantly reduce the APACHE II score of patients with severe wasp sting injury, and the efficacy is superior to CVVH+HP and CVVH+PE regimens, with safety.

Pharmacokinetics of zanamivir in critically ill patients undergoing continuous venovenous hemofiltration.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist for dosing of zanamivir in the setting of CVVH in the intensive care unit (ICU). Our objective is to report the pharmacokinetics and sieving coefficient (Sv) of zanamivir in patients receiving continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH). METHODS: In this prospective observational study, patients of ≥18 years admitted to the ICU with a life-threatening Influenza A or B infection, treated with zanamivir i.v. undergoing CVVH were included. Patients received a zanamivir loading dose of 600 mg i.v., 12 h later followed by maintenance dosages two times daily according to the treating physician. Per patient, nine CFT plasma and nine ultrafiltrate samples were drawn on day 2 of treatment and analysed with a validated HPLC-MS/MS method. RESULTS: Four patients were included in the study. The zanamivir elimination half-life was prolonged with 5.6-9.9 h, compared to patients with normal renal function. A Sv of approximately 1.0 was identified, with unrestricted transport of zanamivir to the ultrafiltrate. CONCLUSIONS: Zanamivir is well cleared by CVVH. In absence of the possibility for therapeutic drug monitoring, the ultrafiltration rate seems as a good surrogate parameter to estimate the CLCVVH and may help guide the dosing of zanamivir.