Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 7.832
Filter
1.
World J Gastroenterol ; 30(22): 2881-2892, 2024 Jun 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38947296

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is one of the most important causes of death following liver resection. Heparin, an established anticoagulant, can protect liver function through a number of mechanisms, and thus, prevent liver failure. AIM: To look at the safety and efficacy of heparin in preventing hepatic dysfunction after hepatectomy. METHODS: The data was extracted from Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) v1. 4 pinpointed patients who had undergone hepatectomy for liver cancer, subdividing them into two cohorts: Those who were injected with heparin and those who were not. The statistical evaluations used were unpaired t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, chi-square tests, and Fisher's exact tests to assess the effect of heparin administration on PHLF, duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, need for mechanical ventilation, use of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), incidence of hypoxemia, development of acute kidney injury, and ICU mortality. Logistic regression was utilized to analyze the factors related to PHLF, with propensity score matching (PSM) aiming to balance the preoperative disparities between the two groups. RESULTS: In this study, 1388 patients who underwent liver cancer hepatectomy were analyzed. PSM yielded 213 matched pairs from the heparin-treated and control groups. Initial univariate analyses indicated that heparin potentially reduces the risk of PHLF in both matched and unmatched samples. Further analysis in the matched cohorts confirmed a significant association, with heparin reducing the risk of PHLF (odds ratio: 0.518; 95% confidence interval: 0.295-0.910; P = 0.022). Additionally, heparin treatment correlated with improved short-term postoperative outcomes such as reduced ICU stay durations, diminished requirements for respiratory support and CRRT, and lower incidences of hypoxemia and ICU mortality. CONCLUSION: Liver failure is an important hazard following hepatic surgery. During ICU care heparin administration has been proved to decrease the occurrence of hepatectomy induced liver failure. This indicates that heparin may provide a hopeful option for controlling PHLF.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , Heparin , Hepatectomy , Liver Failure , Liver Neoplasms , Postoperative Complications , Humans , Hepatectomy/adverse effects , Heparin/administration & dosage , Heparin/adverse effects , Heparin/therapeutic use , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Liver Failure/prevention & control , Liver Failure/mortality , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Propensity Score
2.
Am J Case Rep ; 25: e944121, 2024 Jun 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38944681

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a disease in which the immune response elicited by heparin results in a state of hypercoagulability and platelet activation, leading to thrombocytopenia and thromboembolism. Gustilo-Anderson type IIIC open fractures of the extremities are defined as open fractures presenting with arterial injuries that require repair and result in treatment challenges and complications. The diagnosis of HIT can be difficult in patients with severe trauma with consumptive thrombocytopenia associated with heavy bleeding and the use of heparin after vascular anastomosis. CASE REPORT A 48-year-old man was injured in a car accident, pinching his right lower leg and sustaining a Gustilo-Anderson type IIIc open fracture, for which he underwent emergency revascularization surgery. Heparin was administered continuously immediately after the surgery. On postoperative day 9, ischemic changes were observed in the right foot, and we performed suture re-anastomosis; however, the blood circulation in the right lower leg did not resume, and right lower leg amputation was performed due to ischemic necrosis with the onset of HIT. Postoperatively, the patient was switched to edoxaban after the recovery of his platelet count. Thereafter, the patient experienced no new thrombus occlusion or wound trouble, and was able to walk on a prosthetic leg and return to daily life. CONCLUSIONS It is important to consider the possibility of HIT as soon as thrombocytopenia appears in patients with Gustilo-Anderson type IIIC open fracture who are receiving heparin after vascular anastomosis, as a delayed diagnosis of HIT can make it difficult to save the limb.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Open , Heparin , Limb Salvage , Thrombocytopenia , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Heparin/adverse effects , Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced , Fractures, Open/surgery , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Ischemia/surgery , Ischemia/etiology , Ischemia/chemically induced
6.
Int J Mol Sci ; 25(12)2024 Jun 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38928208

ABSTRACT

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) and its low-molecular-weight fragments (LMWH) are widely used as anticoagulants for surgical procedures and extracorporeal blood purification therapies such as cardiovascular surgery and dialysis. The anticoagulant effect of heparin is essential for the optimal execution of extracorporeal blood circulation. However, at the end of these procedures, to avoid the risk of bleeding, it is necessary to neutralize it. Currently, the only antidote for heparin neutralization is protamine sulphate, a highly basic protein which constitutes a further source of serious side events and is ineffective in neutralizing LMWH. Furthermore, dialysis patients, due to the routine administration of heparin, often experience serious adverse effects, among which HIT (heparin-induced thrombocytopenia) is one of the most severe. For this reason, the finding of new heparin antagonists or alternative methods for heparin removal from blood is of great interest. Here, we describe the synthesis and characterization of a set of biocompatible macroporous cryogels based on poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (pHEMA) and L-lysine with strong filtering capability and remarkable neutralization performance with regard to UFH and LMWH. These properties could enable the design and creation of a filtering device to rapidly reverse heparin, protecting patients from the harmful consequences of the anticoagulant.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , Cryogels , Heparin , Lysine , Heparin/chemistry , Heparin/adverse effects , Humans , Cryogels/chemistry , Anticoagulants/chemistry , Lysine/chemistry , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/chemistry , Heparin Antagonists/chemistry
7.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr ; 48(5): 624-632, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38837803

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Selection of central venous catheter (CVC) lock solution impacts catheter mechanical complications and central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) in pediatric patients with intestinal failure. Disadvantages of the current clinical standards, heparin and ethanol lock therapy (ELT), led to the discovery of new lock solutions. High-risk pediatric patients with intestinal failure who lost access to ELT during a recent shortage were offered enrollment in a compassionate use trial with 4% tetrasodium EDTA (T-EDTA), a lock solution with antimicrobial, antibiofilm, and antithrombotic properties. METHODS: We performed a descriptive cohort study including 14 high-risk pediatric patients with intestinal failure receiving 4% T-EDTA as a daily catheter lock solution. CVC complications were documented (repairs, occlusions, replacements, and CLABSIs). Complication rates on 4% T-EDTA were compared with baseline rates, during which patients were receiving either heparin or ELT (designated as heparin/ELT). RESULTS: Patients initiated 4% T-EDTA at the time they were enrolled in the compassionate use protocol. Use of 4% T-EDTA resulted in a 50% reduction in CVC complications, compared with baseline rates on heparin/ELT (incidence rate ratio: 0.50; 95% CI, 0.25-1.004; P = 0.051). CONCLUSION: In a compassionate use protocol for high-risk pediatric patients with intestinal failure, the use of 4% T-EDTA reduced composite catheter complications, including those leading to emergency department visits, hospital admissions, additional procedures, and mortality. This outcome suggests 4% T-EDTA has benefits over currently available lock solutions.


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections , Catheterization, Central Venous , Central Venous Catheters , Edetic Acid , Intestinal Failure , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Edetic Acid/therapeutic use , Edetic Acid/administration & dosage , Central Venous Catheters/adverse effects , Female , Male , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Child, Preschool , Infant , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Child , Heparin/administration & dosage , Heparin/adverse effects , Compassionate Use Trials , Cohort Studies
8.
Kardiologiia ; 64(5): 18-25, 2024 May 31.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38841785

ABSTRACT

The extensive use of therapeutic doses of heparin to prevent thrombosis in critically ill patients with COVID-19 during the pandemic has led to an increased incidence of bleeding and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). In addition, the introduction of the AstraZeneca and Johnson&Johnson vaccines against COVID-19 into clinical practice was associated with the development of a rare but very severe, adverse thrombotic complication, vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT). Thrombotic complications of VITT turned out to be similar to HIT both clinically and pathophysiologically. HIT is a potentially fatal immune-mediated adverse drug response that results in emergence of antibodies that activate platelets in the presence of heparin. HIT is characterized by a high incidence of venous and arterial thromboses, often with fatal outcomes. Currently, there are clearly defined international guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of HIT. In case of thrombotic complications, non-heparin anticoagulants should be used.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , COVID-19 , Heparin , Thrombocytopenia , Humans , Heparin/adverse effects , Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , COVID-19/complications , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Thrombosis/prevention & control , Thrombosis/etiology
9.
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis ; 35(5): 265-270, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38874904

ABSTRACT

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a prothrombotic condition induced by platelet-activating IgG antibodies that recognize PF4/heparin complexes. Diagnosis of HIT relies on enzyme immunologic assays (EIAs) and functional assays [serotonin release assay (SRA)]. Our institution uses a latex immunoturbidimetric assay (LIA), which has shown a positive-predictive value (PPV) of 55.6%, and a negative-predictive value (NPV) of 99.7%. The low PPV of EIAs/LIAs, in combination with the clinical delay in obtaining results of a SRA, commonly leads to a false-positive diagnosis of HIT and inappropriate treatment. We performed a single-institution retrospective study at a large tertiary center to assess patient management decisions and economic costs following a false-positive HIT (LIA) test. This study found an 89.5% incidence of false-positive HIT (LIA) tests. 97.4% of patients underwent anticoagulation changes. 69.6% of patients were switched to argatroban. Of patients with a false-positive HIT immunoassay (LIA), 42 (40.7%) patients were on a prophylactic dose of anticoagulation at the time of HIT (LIA) positivity, of which 22 (52.4%) were switched to full anticoagulation with either argatroban or fondaparinux. Of the 22 patients switched to full anticoagulation, 15 (68%) had low-probability 4T scores. Seven (8.8%) of patients had bleeding events after HIT (LIA) positivity. All seven patients were switched to argatroban from a full-dose heparin anticoagulation. Five of the seven patients were considered major bleeds. Utilization of argatroban incurred substantial costs, estimated at approximately $73 000 for false-positive HIT cases. False-positive HIT (LIA) tests contribute to unwarranted anticoagulation changes, increased bleeding risks, and substantial healthcare costs. Incorporating the 4T score into diagnostic algorithms may help mitigate these risks by guiding appropriate clinical decisions. Future research should focus on refining diagnostic approaches and standardizing management strategies to improve patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness in HIT diagnosis and management.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , Heparin , Thrombocytopenia , Humans , Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced , Thrombocytopenia/diagnosis , Thrombocytopenia/economics , Heparin/adverse effects , False Positive Reactions , Retrospective Studies , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Aged , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Anticoagulants/economics , Immunoassay/economics , Immunoassay/methods , Arginine/analogs & derivatives , Pipecolic Acids/therapeutic use , Pipecolic Acids/economics , Sulfonamides/economics , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use
12.
Am J Nurs ; 124(6): 40-46, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38780339

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is a high-risk medication that can cause bleeding and/or thrombotic complications if not managed appropriately. Between January and July 2019, our institution experienced a high number of patient safety events related to UFH infusion for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). PURPOSE: The aim of this quality improvement (QI) initiative was to prevent these safety events by improving compliance with our institution's nurse-driven VTE UFH infusion protocol. METHODS: Baseline data for patients on the VTE UFH protocol were collected to identify improvement opportunities. Compliance with eight standards of care related to the VTE UFH infusion protocol was measured. Time to first therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) was recorded to assess the benefit of improved compliance. INTERVENTIONS: Institutional policy updates were made to clarify the management of UFH infusions and documentation in the electronic health record. A multidisciplinary workgroup implemented order set changes, nursing communication orders, UFH infusion reports, and a nursing education module to promote compliance with the protocol. RESULTS: The overall rate of compliance with the VTE UFH infusion protocol increased from 79.4% at baseline to 85.2% following implementation of the QI initiative, and the median time to first therapeutic aPTT decreased from 831.5 minutes to 808 minutes over the same period. CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary initiative to address improvement opportunities in a nurse-driven UFH protocol for VTE treatment increased compliance with the protocol and decreased the time to first therapeutic aPTT.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , Guideline Adherence , Heparin , Quality Improvement , Venous Thromboembolism , Humans , Venous Thromboembolism/drug therapy , Venous Thromboembolism/nursing , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Heparin/administration & dosage , Heparin/therapeutic use , Heparin/adverse effects , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Infusions, Intravenous , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Safety/standards
13.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis ; 117(5): 351-357, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38644068

ABSTRACT

Around 10% of patients with acute coronary syndrome are treated by vitamin K antagonists or non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for various indications. The initial management of these patients is highly complex, and new guidelines specify that, only during percutaneous coronary intervention, a bolus of unfractionated heparin is recommended in one of the following circumstances: (1) if the patient is receiving a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant; or (2) if the international normalized ratio is<2.5 in a patient being treated with a vitamin K antagonist. In this review, we report on five key messages essential for the management of these patients. There are no randomized studies to date, and we propose two diagnostic and/or therapeutic decision algorithms. However, randomized studies are needed to validate these strategies.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , Algorithms , Anticoagulants , Clinical Decision-Making , Decision Support Techniques , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Vitamin K , Humans , Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnosis , Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Administration, Oral , Vitamin K/antagonists & inhibitors , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Time Factors , Risk Factors , Predictive Value of Tests , International Normalized Ratio , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Blood Coagulation/drug effects , Heparin/adverse effects , Heparin/administration & dosage , Heparin/therapeutic use
14.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 35(6): 1212-1216, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38650520

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Early guidance recommended a bolus of intravenous heparin at the beginning of leadless pacemaker (LP) implantation procedures. However, due to concern about bleeding complications, more recent practice has tended toward omitting the bolus and only running a continuous heparin infusion through the introducer sheath. The impact of omitting the heparin bolus on procedural outcomes is not clear. METHODS: We reviewed all Medtronic Micra LP implants at our institution from 9/2014 to 9/2022. The decision to bolus with heparin was at operator discretion. RESULTS: Among 621 LP implants, 326 received an intravenous heparin bolus, 243 did not, and 52 patients were excluded because heparin bolus status could not be confirmed. There was a trend toward more frequent omission of the heparin bolus with more recent implants. Median follow-up after LP implant was 14.3 (interquartile range [IQR]: 8.4-27.9) months. There was no difference between heparin bolus and no bolus groups in the number of device deployments/recaptures (1.42 ± 0.81 vs. 1.31 ± 0.66, p = .15). Implant-related adverse events were also similar between heparin bolus and no bolus groups: access-site hematoma requiring intervention (7 vs. 5, p = .99), pseudoaneurysm (1 vs. 1, p = .99), cardiac perforation (1 vs. 1, p = .99), intraprocedural device thrombus formation (2 vs. 4, p = .41), 30-day rehospitalization (21 vs. 15, p = .98), and 30-day all-cause mortality (16 vs. 14, p = .70). There was one additional nonfatal cardiac perforation in a patient who was excluded due to unknown heparin bolus status. Regarding device electrical parameters between heparin bolus and no bolus groups, there were no significant differences at the time of implant: pacing capture threshold 0.5 ± 0.4 vs. 0.5 ± 0.3, p = .10; pacing impedance 739.9 ± 226.4 vs. 719.1 ± 215.4, p = .52; R wave sensing 11.7 ± 5.7 vs. 12.0 ± 5.4, p = .34). Long-term device performance was also similar between groups. CONCLUSION: Omission of the systemic heparin bolus at the time of LP implantation appears safe in appropriately selected patients. Heparin bolus may still be considered in long cases requiring multiple device deployments or in patients at high risk for thrombotic complications.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , Cardiac Pacing, Artificial , Heparin , Pacemaker, Artificial , Humans , Heparin/administration & dosage , Heparin/adverse effects , Male , Aged , Female , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Risk Factors , Aged, 80 and over , Middle Aged , Drug Administration Schedule , Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Prosthesis Design
15.
Cir Pediatr ; 37(2): 84-88, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38623802

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Hematomas are a rare cause of intestinal obstruction. Subcutaneous heparin can bring about direct punctures on small bowel loops, potentially leading to traumatic hematoma and intestinal obstruction. CASE REPORTS: We present three cases of pediatric patients with clinical signs of intestinal obstruction treated with subcutaneous heparin. Two cases had increased acute-phase reactants and radiological signs of intestinal suffering, so surgical treatment was decided upon, with intramural hematoma emerging as an intraoperative finding. The third case was conservatively managed with anticoagulant discontinuation and gut rest, since the patient had an adequate general condition and no findings compatible with ischemia or necrosis were noted in the complementary tests. DISCUSSION: The administration of subcutaneous heparin may cause intestinal wall hematomas due to its anticoagulating effect and to the risk of inadvertent punctures on small bowel loops.


INTRODUCCION: Los hematomas son una causa poco frecuente de obstrucción intestinal. La heparina subcutánea tiene riesgo de producir la punción directa de un asa intestinal, provocando un hematoma traumático que genere una obstrucción intestinal. CASOS CLINICOS: Se describen tres casos de pacientes pediátricos con clínica de obstrucción intestinal en tratamiento con heparina subcutánea. Dos casos presentaron elevación de reactantes de fase aguda y signos radiológicos de sufrimiento intestinal por lo que se optó por tratamiento quirúrgico, con el hallazgo intraoperatorio de hematoma intramural. El tercer caso fue manejado de manera conservadora con supresión de la anticoagulación y reposo intestinal, dado el adecuado estado general y ausencia de hallazgos compatibles con isquemia o necrosis en las pruebas complementarias. COMENTARIOS: La administración de heparina subcutánea puede provocar la aparición de hematomas de pared intestinal, tanto por su efecto anticoagulante, como por el riesgo de punción inadvertida de un asa intestinal.


Subject(s)
Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight , Intestinal Obstruction , Humans , Child , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/adverse effects , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Intestinal Obstruction/chemically induced , Intestinal Obstruction/surgery , Hematoma/chemically induced , Hematoma/complications , Hematoma/surgery , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/surgery , Heparin/adverse effects
17.
A A Pract ; 18(4): e01767, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38578015

ABSTRACT

Pulmonary embolism is a common complication after intracranial hemorrhage. As thrombolysis is contraindicated in this situation, surgical pulmonary embolectomy may be indicated in case of high-risk pulmonary embolism but requires transient anticoagulation with heparin during cardiopulmonary bypass. We report the case of a patient with a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia who presented with a high-risk pulmonary embolism 10 days after the spontaneous onset of a voluminous intracerebral hematoma. Despite high doses of heparin required to run the cardiopulmonary bypass and subsequent anticoagulation by danaparoid sodium, the brain hematoma remained stable and the patient was discharged without complications 30 days after surgery.


Subject(s)
Pulmonary Embolism , Thrombocytopenia , Humans , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Cardiopulmonary Bypass/adverse effects , Heparin/adverse effects , Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced , Thrombocytopenia/surgery , Pulmonary Embolism/drug therapy , Pulmonary Embolism/surgery , Pulmonary Embolism/complications , Intracranial Hemorrhages/surgery , Intracranial Hemorrhages/complications , Cerebral Hemorrhage , Embolectomy/adverse effects , Hematoma/surgery
18.
Thromb Res ; 237: 129-137, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38583310

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening situation in cancer patients. In this situation, anticoagulant therapy is complex to administer due to the risk of bleeding. Only few studies have been conducted when these patients are admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). The aim of this study was to assess the association between anticoagulation strategies as well as other factors with 90-day mortality in patients with cancer and PE admitted to ICU. Major bleeding was also evaluated according to the type of anticoagulation. METHODS: Retrospective study carried out in 4 ICUs in France over a 12-year period (2009-2021). All patients with cancer and PE were included. An overlap propensity score weighting analysis was performed in the subgroup of patients treated with either unfractionated heparins (UFH) alone or low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) alone on 90-day mortality and major bleeding. RESULTS: A total of 218 consecutive cancer patients admitted to ICU and presenting PE were included. The 90-day mortality rate was 42 % for the global cohort. After propensity score analysis in the subgroup of patients treated with either "UFH alone" (n = 80) or "LMWH alone" (n = 71), the 90-day mortality was similar in patients treated with UFH alone (42.6 %) vs LMWH alone (39.9 %): OR = 1.124, CI 95 % [0.571-2.214], p = 0.750. There was a significant increased toward major bleeding rates in the "UFH alone" group (25.5 %) as compared to "LMWH alone" group (11.5 %), p = 0.04. CONCLUSION: In 218 patients admitted to ICU and presenting PE, the 90-day mortality rate was 42 %. Treatment with UFH alone was associated with a mortality comparable to treatment with LMWH alone but it appeared to be more prone to major bleeding.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , Intensive Care Units , Neoplasms , Pulmonary Embolism , Humans , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Male , Pulmonary Embolism/mortality , Pulmonary Embolism/drug therapy , Female , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/mortality , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Aged , Risk Factors , Middle Aged , Hemorrhage/mortality , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/therapeutic use , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/adverse effects , Acute Disease , Heparin/therapeutic use , Heparin/adverse effects , France/epidemiology
19.
Blood Adv ; 8(11): 2825-2834, 2024 Jun 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38588487

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: New analytical techniques can assess hundreds of proteins simultaneously with high sensitivity, facilitating the observation of their complex interplay and role in disease mechanisms. We hypothesized that proteomic profiling targeting proteins involved in thrombus formation, inflammation, and the immune response would identify potentially new biomarkers for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Four existing panels of the Olink proximity extension assay covering 356 proteins involved in thrombus formation, inflammation, and immune response were applied to randomly selected patients with suspected HIT (confirmed HIT, n = 32; HIT ruled out, n = 38; and positive heparin/platelet factor 4 [H/PF4] antibodies, n = 28). The relative difference in protein concentration was analyzed using a linear regression model adjusted for sex and age. To confirm the test results, soluble P-selectin was determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in above mentioned patients and an additional second data set (n = 49). HIT was defined as a positive heparin-induced platelet activation assay (washed platelet assay). Among 98 patients of the primary data set, the median 4Ts score was 5 in patients with HIT, 4 in patients with positive H/PF4 antibodies, and 3 in patients without HIT. The median optical density of a polyspecific H/PF4 ELISA were 3.0, 0.9, and 0.3. Soluble P-selectin remained statistically significant after multiple test adjustments. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.81 for Olink and 0.8 for ELISA. Future studies shall assess the diagnostic and prognostic value of soluble P-selectin in the management of HIT.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers , Heparin , Proteomics , Thrombocytopenia , Humans , Heparin/adverse effects , Female , Proteomics/methods , Male , Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced , Thrombocytopenia/diagnosis , Thrombocytopenia/blood , Middle Aged , Aged , P-Selectin/blood , Platelet Factor 4 , Adult , Platelet Activation
20.
Saudi Med J ; 45(4): 341-348, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38657982

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban anticoagulation in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library electronic databases, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched to identify all relevant randomized controlled trial studies from December 2019 to July 2023. RESULTS: A total of 6 randomized controlled trials, which included a total of 3323 patients, were considered for evaluation. Overall, short-term all-cause mortality and hospitalization rates were not significantly different between the rivaroxaban and control groups. Thrombotic events were significantly reduced in the rivaroxaban prophylaxis group compared to the placebo control group. However, the reduction in thrombotic events was not significantly different between rivaroxaban therapy and heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). Rivaroxaban prophylaxis and the therapeutic dose may be associated with a higher rate of overall bleeding rate, but major bleeding rates did not differ substantially. CONCLUSION: Rivaroxaban may reduce thrombotic events in COVID-19 patients, but it does not appear to have an advantage over heparin or LMWH, and it may increase the risk of bleeding.INPLASY Reg. No.: INPLASY 202370097.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , COVID-19 , Hemorrhage , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Rivaroxaban , Humans , Rivaroxaban/therapeutic use , Rivaroxaban/adverse effects , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , COVID-19/complications , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/therapeutic use , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/adverse effects , Factor Xa Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Factor Xa Inhibitors/adverse effects , Thrombosis/prevention & control , Thrombosis/etiology , Treatment Outcome , Heparin/therapeutic use , Heparin/adverse effects , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...