Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 2.582
Filter
1.
Am J Case Rep ; 25: e943721, 2024 Jun 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38886994

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND rimary hepatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PHNEN) are exceedingly rare tumors with atypical clinical manifestations, accounting for less than 0.5% of all neuroendocrine tumors. Currently, there is a lack of consensus on their management, and guidelines do not recommend postoperative chemotherapy for patients with stage G1/G2 disease after curative resection. We present a case report of PHNEN, outlining its diagnostic challenges, treatment strategy, and clinical outcomes. CASE REPORT A 31-year-old man presented with jaundice and was initially diagnosed with suspected IgG4-related disease, which initially appeared to respond to steroid therapy, but manifested worsening jaundice 4 months after initial treatment. Subsequent evaluation revealed a PHNEN NET G2 with lymph node metastasis and invasion of the right hepatic artery; and involvement of the hepatic duct at the hepatic hilum, primarily the left hepatic duct. The patient underwent extended left hemi-hepatectomy with caudate lobe resection, bile duct resection, and lymphadenectomy, followed by reconstruction of the right hepatic artery. Postoperatively, the patient received adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of capecitabine (1000 mg bid D1-14) and temozolomide (200 mg qn D10-14) for 6 cycles. Currently, the patient remains disease free 43 months after treatment. CONCLUSIONS PHNEN presents diagnostic challenges due to its rarity and lack of specific markers. Surgical resection remains the cornerstone of treatment, with chemotherapy being considered in select cases with high-risk features. Further research is needed to refine treatment approaches and improve outcomes for patients with PHNEN.


Subject(s)
Hepatectomy , Hepatic Artery , Liver Neoplasms , Neuroendocrine Tumors , Humans , Male , Adult , Hepatic Artery/surgery , Hepatectomy/methods , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Neuroendocrine Tumors/surgery
2.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 31(7): 4688-4690, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38714624

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Locally advanced cancers of the pancreatic body can abut or involve the celiac axis, hepatic artery, or superior mesenteric artery. Recent evidence suggests that these tumors are amenable to surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (Hackert et al., Locally advanced pancreatic cancer: neoadjuvant therapy with FOLFIRINOX results in resectability in 60 % of the patients. Ann Surg 264:457-463, 2016; Rangelova et al., Surgery improves survival after neoadjuvant therapy for borderline and locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. Ann Surg 273:579-86, 2021). An arterial divestment technique can be used for these cancers to get an R0 clearance, thereby avoiding morbid arterial resections (Miao et al., Arterial divestment instead of resection for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Pancreatology 16:S59, 2016; Habib et al., Periadventitial dissection of the superior mesenteric artery for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: surgical planning with the "halo sign" and "string sign." Surgery 169(5):1026-1031, 2021; Diener et al., Periarterial divestment in pancreatic cancer surgery. Surgery 169(5):1026-31, 2020). Two techniques are described for arterial divestment. In the periarterial divestment technique, the plane of the dissection is between the tumor and the adventitia (Habib et al., Periadventitial dissection of the superior mesenteric artery for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: surgical planning with the "halo sign" and "string sign." Surgery 169(5):1026-1031, 2021; Diener et al., Periarterial divestment in pancreatic cancer surgery. Surgery 169(5):1026-31, 2020). In sub-adventitial dissection, the plane of dissection is between the tunica adventitia and the external elastic lamina (Gao et al., Sub-adventitial divestment technique for resecting artery-involved pancreatic cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 406:691-701, 2021). The TRIANGLE operation also is one of the surgical techniques to achieve R0 resection in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (Hackert et al., The TRIANGLE operation: radical surgery after neoadjuvant treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer: a single-arm observational study. HPB Oxford 19:1001-1007, 2017). This multimedia article aims to demonstrate peri-arterial and sub-adventitial divestment techniques as well as the TRIANGLE operation for a locally advanced cancer of the body of the pancreas. The video also highlights the technique of posterior radical antegrade modular pancreato-splenectomy (RAMPS) together with lymph node clearance. PATIENT AND METHODS: A 57-year-old women was detected to have pancreatic body adenocarcinoma with tumor contact of the artery and superior mesenteric artery. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, she was planned to undergo surgical resection. RESULTS: The surgical technique consisted of peri-arterial and sub-adventitial divestment, the TRIANGLE operation and RAMPS (Fig. 1). The procedure was performed within 240 min and involved blood loss of 250 mL. After the procedure, pancreatic leak (POPF-B), chyle leak and diarrhea developed, which were managed conservatively. The final histopathology showed residual, viable, moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma (ypT2N1M0) with all resection margins free. CONCLUSION: The surgical technique consisting of peri-arterial and sub-adventitial divestment, the TRIANGLE operation and RAMPS helps in R0 resection of locally advanced pancreatic body cancer without any compromise in oncologic outcomes and offers an alternative surgical approach to morbid arterial resection.


Subject(s)
Mesenteric Artery, Superior , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Humans , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Mesenteric Artery, Superior/surgery , Mesenteric Artery, Superior/pathology , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Celiac Artery/surgery , Celiac Artery/pathology , Hepatic Artery/surgery , Hepatic Artery/pathology , Pancreatectomy/methods , Prognosis , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Vascular Surgical Procedures/methods
3.
Surg Endosc ; 38(7): 3728-3737, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38780631

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In patients with hepatic artery variation (HAV), feasibility and justification of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) for periampullary lesions have been not been well established. METHODS: A total of 600 patients with periampullary lesions receiving RPD or open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) were identified from our prospectively collected computer database. Surgical outcomes, oncological radicality, and survival outcomes after RPD in HAV ( +) and (-) patients were compared. RESULTS: The incidence of HAV was 16%, including 12.7% in patients with RPD and 23.0% in those with OPD. In the HAV ( +) group, vascular injury rate had no statistical difference between the RPD (3.7%) and OPD (9.1%) patients, P = 0.404. Among the RPD patients, those with HAV ( +) had longer operation time (8.5 ± 2.5 vs. 7.7 ± 2.0 h, P = 0.013) and higher vascular injury (3.8% vs. 0.6%, P = 0.024) when compared with the HAV (-) patients. There was no significant difference between the HAV ( +) and (-) patients with RPD regarding blood loss, open conversion, vascular resection, and surgical mortality and morbidity. There was no survival difference between the HAV ( +) and (-) patients with pancreatic head adenocarcinoma after RPD. There was no survival difference between RPD and OPD in the HAV ( +) group. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with OPD, RPD is feasible and justifiable without increasing vascular injury rate for patients with HAV ( +). Hepatic artery variation has no negative impact on surgical, oncological, and survival outcomes following an RPD, if it is accurately identified pre-operatively and appropriately managed intraoperatively.


Subject(s)
Hepatic Artery , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Pancreaticoduodenectomy , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Humans , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/methods , Hepatic Artery/surgery , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Treatment Outcome , Operative Time , Retrospective Studies
4.
Exp Clin Transplant ; 22(3): 242-243, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38695594

ABSTRACT

Few case reports have documented the long-term outcomes of liver donor aneurysms, illustrating the apprehension of transplant surgeons about using these grafts. However,the presence of an aneurysm in the donor liver should not be an absolute contraindication for its use. As shown in our described patient, such grafts have the potential to achieve good results.


Subject(s)
Aneurysm , Hepatic Artery , Liver Transplantation , Tissue Donors , Humans , Hepatic Artery/surgery , Aneurysm/surgery , Aneurysm/diagnostic imaging , Treatment Outcome , Tissue Donors/supply & distribution , Male , Donor Selection , Middle Aged , Computed Tomography Angiography
5.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 31(7): 4449-4451, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38632219

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hepatic artery infusion pump (HAIP) with floxuridine/dexamethasone and systemic chemotherapy is an established treatment regimen, which had been reported about converting 47% of patients with stage 4 colorectal liver metastasis from unresectable to resectable.1,2 To this effect, HAIP chemotherapy contributes to prolonged survival of many patients, which otherwise may not have other treatment options. Biliary sclerosis, however, is a known complication of the HAIP treatment, which occurs in approximately 5.5% of patients receiving this modality as an adjuvant therapy after hepatectomy and in 2% of patients receiving HAIP treatment for unresectable disease.3 While biliary sclerosis diffusely affects the perihilar and intrahepatic biliary tree, a dominant stricture maybe found in select cases, which gives an opportunity for a local surgical treatment after failure of endoscopic stenting/dilations. While the use of minimally invasive approach to biliary surgery is gradually increasing,4 there have been no descriptions of its application in this scenario. In this video, we demonstrate the use of minimally invasive robotic technique for biliary stricturoplasty and Roux-en-Y (RY) hepaticojejunostomy to treat persistent right hepatic duct stricture after HAIP chemotherapy. PATIENT: A 68-year-old woman with history of multifocal bilobar stage 4 colorectal liver metastasis presented to our office with obstructive jaundice and recurrent cholangitis that required nine endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies (ERCPs) and a placement of internal-external percutaneous transhepatic biliary drain (PTBD) by interventional radiology within the past 2 years. Her past surgical history was consistent with laparoscopic right hemicolectomy 3 years prior, followed by a left lateral sectorectomy with placement of an HAIP for adjuvant treatment. The patient had more than ten metastatic liver lesions within the right and left lobe, ranging from 2 to 3 cm in size at the time of HAIP placement. The patient had a histologically normal background liver parenchyma before the HAIP chemotherapy treatment. The patient did not have any history of alcohol use, diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, or other underlying intrinsic liver disorders, which are known to contribute to the development of hepatic fibrosis. Despite a radiologically disease-free status, the patient started to have episodes of acute cholangitis 1 year after the placement of HAIP that required multiple admissions to a local hospital. The HAIP was subsequently removed once the diagnosis of biliary sclerosis was made despite dose reductions and treatment with intrahepatic dexamethasone for almost 1 year. In addition to this finding, the known liver metastases have shown complete radiological resolution. Therefore further treatment with HAIP was deemed unnecessary, and pump removal was undertaken. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a dominant stricture at the junction of the right anterior and right posterior sectoral hepatic duct. The location of the dominant stricture was confirmed by an ERCP and cholangioscopy. Absence of neoplasia was confirmed with multiple cholangioscopic biopsies. Multiple endoscopic and percutaneous attempts with stent placement failed to dilate the area of stricture. Postprocedural cholangiographies showed a persistent significant narrowing, which led to multiple recurrent obstructive jaundice and severe cholangitis. While the use of surgical approach is rarely needed in the treatment of biliary sclerosis, a decision was made after extensive multidisciplinary discussions to perform a robotic stricturoplasty and RY hepaticojejunostomy with preservation of the native common bile duct. TECHNIQUE: The operation began with a laparoscopic adhesiolysis to allow for identification of HAIP tubing (which was later removed) and placement of robotic ports. A peripheral liver biopsy was obtained to evaluate the degree of hepatic parenchymal fibrosis. Porta hepatic area was carefully exposed without causing an inadvertent injury to the surrounding hollow organs. Biopsy of perihepatic soft tissues was taken as appropriate to rule out any extrahepatic disease. The common bile duct and common hepatic duct with ERCP stents within it were identified with the use of ultrasonography. Anterior wall of the common hepatic duct was then opened, exposing the two plastic stents. Cephalad extension of the choledochotomy was made toward the biliary bifurcation and the right hepatic duct. The distal common bile duct was preserved for future endoscopic access to the biliary tree. After lowering the right-sided hilar plate, dense fibrosis around the right hepatic duct was divided sharply with robotic scissors, achieving a mechanical release of the dominant stricture. An intraoperative cholangioscopy was performed to confirm adequate openings of the right hepatic duct secondary and tertiary radicles, as well as patency of the left hepatic duct. A 4-Fr Fogarty catheter was used to sweep the potential biliary debris from within the right and left hepatic lobe. Finally, a confirmatory choledochoscopy was performed to ensure patency and clearance of the right-sided intrahepatic biliary ducts and the left hepatic duct before fashioning the hepaticojejunostomy. A 40-cm antecolic roux limb was next prepared for the RY hepaticojejunostomy. A side-to-side double staple technique was utilized to create the jejunojejunostomy. The common enterotomy was closed in a running watertight fashion. Once the roux limb was transposed to the porta hepatic in a tension-free manner, a side-to-side hepaticojejunostomy was constructed in a running fashion by using absorbable barbed sutures. The index suture was placed at 9 o'clock location, and the posterior wall of the anastomosis was run toward 3 o'clock location. This stabilized the roux limb to the bile duct. The anterior wall of the anastomosis was next fashioned by using a running technique from both corners of the anastomosis toward the middle (12 o'clock), where both sutures were tied together. This completed a wide side-to-side hepaticojejunostomy anastomosis encompassing the upper common hepatic duct, biliary bifurcation, and the right hepatic duct. A closed suction drain was placed before closing.5 RESULTS: The operative time was approximately 4 hr with 60 ml of blood loss. The postoperative course was uneventful. The patient was discharged home on postoperative Day 5 after removal of the closed suction drain, confirming the absence of bile leak. The patient had developed periportal/periductal fibrosis, cholestasis, and moderate-severe parenchymal fibrosis (F3-F4) based on liver biopsy, often seen in patients treated with a long course of floxuridine HAIP chemotherapy. The patient is clinically doing well at 1 year outpatient follow-up without any evidence of recurrent cholangitis at the time of this manuscript preparation. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic biliary stricturoplasty with RY hepaticojejunostomy for treatment of biliary sclerosis after HAIP chemotherapy is safe and feasible. Appropriate experience in minimally invasive hepatobiliary surgery is necessary to achieve this goal.


Subject(s)
Anastomosis, Roux-en-Y , Jejunostomy , Humans , Aged , Hepatic Artery/surgery , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Infusions, Intra-Arterial , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Constriction, Pathologic/etiology , Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures/methods , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Floxuridine/administration & dosage , Prognosis , Infusion Pumps
6.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 409(1): 111, 2024 Apr 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38587539

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The presence of an aberrant right hepatic artery (aRHA), arising from the superior mesenteric artery, is a common variant of the liver vascular anatomy. Considering that tumor spread occurs along vessels, the question arises, whether the presence of an aRHA influences the oncologic outcome after resection for cancer of the pancreatic head. METHODS: Patients with ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head, who underwent resection from 2011 to 2020 at the Frankfurt University Hospital, Germany, were analyzed retrospectively. Surgical records and computed tomography imaging were reviewed for the presence of aRHA. Overall and disease-free survival as well as hepatic recurrence were analyzed according to the presence of aRHA. RESULTS: aRHA was detected in 21 out of 145 patients (14.5%). The median overall survival was 26 months (95%CI 20.8-34.4), median disease-free survival was 12.1 months (95%CI 8.1-17.3). There was no significant difference in overall survival (26.1 versus 21.4 months, adjusted hazard ratio 1.31, 95%CI 0.7-2.46, p = 0.401) or disease-free survival (14.5 months versus 12 months, adjusted hazard ratio 0.98, 95%CI 0.57-1.71, p = 0.957) without and with aRHA. The hepatic recurrence rate was 24.4.% with conventional anatomy versus 30.8% with aRHA (adjusted odds ratio 1.36, 95%CI 0.3-5.38, p = 0.669). In the multivariable analysis, only lymphatic vessel invasion was an independent prognostic factor for hepatic recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of an aRHA does not seem to influence the long-term survival and hepatic recurrence after resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Hepatic Artery , Humans , Hepatic Artery/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Pancreas , Pancreatectomy
8.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 35(7): 963-970, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38519001

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and long-term clinical outcomes of stent-graft placement to treat hepatic arterial hemorrhage after pancreaticobiliary surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Outcomes were retrospectively evaluated in 61 patients (50 men and 11 women; mean age, 63 years) who underwent stent-graft placement for delayed arterial hemorrhage (after 24 hours) after pancreaticobiliary surgery from 2006 to 2023. Bleeding sites included the gastroduodenal artery stump (n = 54), common or proper hepatic artery (n = 5), and right hepatic artery (n = 2). The stent-grafts used were Viabahn (n = 27), Comvi (n = 11), Jostent (n = 3), Covera (n = 11), and Lifestream (n = 7). Technical and clinical success and adverse events (AE) were evaluated. After stent-graft placement, overall survival (OS), hemorrhage-free survival (HFS), and stent patency were evaluated. RESULTS: The technical and clinical success rates of stent-graft placement were 97% and 93%, respectively. The severe AE rate was 12% and was significantly higher in patients who underwent pylorus-sacrificing rather than pylorus-preserving surgery (P = .001). None of the severe AEs were associated with patient mortality. Median OS after stent-graft placement was 854 days, and median HFS was 822 days. The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year stent patency rates were 87%, 84%, 79%, and 72%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Stent-graft placement was safe and provided long-term control of hepatic arterial hemorrhage after pancreaticobiliary surgery.


Subject(s)
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Blood Vessel Prosthesis , Endovascular Procedures , Hepatic Artery , Postoperative Hemorrhage , Stents , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Hepatic Artery/surgery , Hepatic Artery/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Time Factors , Postoperative Hemorrhage/etiology , Postoperative Hemorrhage/therapy , Postoperative Hemorrhage/mortality , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation , Endovascular Procedures/mortality , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Adult , Vascular Patency , Aged, 80 and over , Prosthesis Design , Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures/mortality
9.
Asian J Endosc Surg ; 17(2): e13299, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38499011

ABSTRACT

Suprapancreatic lymph node dissection for patients with gastric cancer in whom the common hepatic artery is located neither at the suprapancreatic margin nor in front of the portal vein is a more difficult procedure than when the common hepatic artery is in a more typical position. There is an increased risk of injury to the vessels that need to be preserved and inadequate lymph node dissection. Measures that have been reported for use in this situation are preoperative diagnosis with three-dimensional computed tomography angiography, dissection using the portal vain as a guide, and safe exposure of the portal vein with dissection to preserve the nerves at the suprapancreatic margin and in front of the portal vein. We review the literature and report our experience with a patient whose common hepatic artery was not located in the suprapancreatic margin who safely underwent suprapancreatic lymph node dissection using these methods.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Hepatic Artery/surgery , Hepatic Artery/pathology , Laparoscopy/methods , Gastrectomy/methods , Lymph Node Excision/methods
10.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 31(6): 4022-4029, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38498089

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hepatic arterial infusion pump (HAIP) chemotherapy is an effective treatment for patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). HAIP chemotherapy requires a catheter inserted in the gastroduodenal artery and a subcutaneous pump. The catheter can be placed using an open or robotic approach. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare perioperative outcomes of robotic versus open HAIP placement in patients with unresectable iCCA. METHODS: We analyzed patients with unresectable iCCA included in the PUMP-II trial from January 2020 to September 2022 undergoing robotic or open HAIP placement at Amsterdam UMC, Erasmus MC, and UMC Utrecht. The primary outcome was time to functional recovery (TTFR). RESULTS: In total, 22 robotic and 28 open HAIP placements were performed. The median TTFR was 2 days after robotic placement versus 5 days after open HAIP placement (p < 0.001). One patient (4.5%) in the robotic group underwent a conversion to open because of a large bulky tumor leaning on the hilum immobilizing the liver. Postoperative complications were similar-36% (8/22) after robotic placement versus 39% (11/28) after open placement (p = 1.000). The median length of hospital stay was shorter in the robotic group-3 versus 5 days (p < 0.001). All 22 robotic patients initiated HAIP chemotherapy post-surgery, i.e. 93% (26/28) in the open group (p = 0.497). The median time to start HAIP chemotherapy was 14 versus 18 days (p = 0.153). CONCLUSION: Robotic HAIP placement in patients with unresectable iCCA is a safe and effective procedure and is associated with a significantly shorter TTFR and hospital stay than open HAIP placement.


Subject(s)
Bile Duct Neoplasms , Cholangiocarcinoma , Hepatic Artery , Infusions, Intra-Arterial , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Humans , Cholangiocarcinoma/surgery , Cholangiocarcinoma/drug therapy , Cholangiocarcinoma/pathology , Male , Female , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Bile Duct Neoplasms/surgery , Bile Duct Neoplasms/drug therapy , Bile Duct Neoplasms/pathology , Infusions, Intra-Arterial/methods , Middle Aged , Hepatic Artery/surgery , Aged , Follow-Up Studies , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Survival Rate , Prognosis
11.
BMC Surg ; 24(1): 96, 2024 Mar 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38521948

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The anastomosis of donor and recipient hepatic arteries is standard in liver transplantations. For transplant recipients with unusable hepatic arteries, appropriate artery selection should be conducted using evidence-based considerations; therefore, this network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to analyze the most suitable alternative recipient artery for anastomosis during liver transplantations. METHODS: Comprehensive searches of the Scopus, Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE databases were conducted to analyze observational studies containing non-standard anastomoses in liver transplantations that used the splenic artery, aorta, celiac, or branches of the gastric artery. The outcome parameters included intraoperative components, complications, and survival data. This NMA used the BUGSnet package in R studio and the results were presented in a Forest plot, league table, and SUCRA plot. RESULTS: Among the 13 studies included in this NMA, 5 arteries were used for the anastomoses. The splenic artery anastomosis showed a high risk of thrombosis and a low risk of stenosis (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.13-3.14) and biliary tract abnormalities (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.36-1.55). In addition, the graft survival (OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.96-1.23) and overall survival (1-year survival OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.94-1.26; 5-year survival OR 1.95% CI 0.83-1.22) showed favorable results using this artery. Constraints to the use of the splenic artery were longer operation and cold ischemic times. However, the duration of hospital stay (MD 1.36, 95% CI -7.47 to 10.8) was shorter than that when the other arteries were used, and the need for blood transfusions was minimal (MD -1.74, 95% CI -10.2 to 6.7). CONCLUSION: In recipients with unusable hepatic arteries, the splenic artery of the patient should be the first consideration for anastomosis selection in liver transplantations.


Subject(s)
Hepatic Artery , Liver Transplantation , Humans , Hepatic Artery/surgery , Liver Transplantation/methods , Bayes Theorem , Network Meta-Analysis , Anastomosis, Surgical/methods , Living Donors
12.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 409(1): 71, 2024 Feb 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38393349

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Anomalies of the right hepatic artery (RHA) may represent an additional challenge in pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). The aim of this study is to assess the potential impact of variations in hepatic arterial anatomy on perioperative outcomes. METHODS: PDs performed for periampullary malignancies between 2017 and 2022 were retrospectively enrolled and subdivided in two groups: modal pattern of vascularization (MPV) and anomalous pattern of vascularization (APV). A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was conducted to homogenize the two study populations. The two groups were then compared in terms of perioperative outcomes and pathological findings. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients (16.3%) out of 232 presented a vascular anomaly: an accessory RHA in 7 cases (3%), a replaced RHA in 26 cases (11.2%), and a replaced HA in 5 cases (2.1%). After PSM, 76 MPV patients were compared to the 38 APV patients. The incidence rate of postoperative complications was comparable between the two study populations (p=0.2). Similarly, no difference was detected in terms of histopathological data, including margin status. No difference was noted in terms of intraoperative hemorrhage and vascular resection. CONCLUSION: When PDs are performed in high-volume centers, the presence of an APV of the RHA does not relate to a significant impact on perioperative complications. Moreover, no influence was noted on histopathological findings.


Subject(s)
Duodenal Neoplasms , Hepatic Artery , Humans , Hepatic Artery/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers , Pancreaticoduodenectomy , Duodenal Neoplasms/surgery
13.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 31(5): 3086, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38319517

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hepatectomy combined with hepatic artery reconstruction in the operation for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (Klatskin tumor) is a challenging procedure. We present a video of left hepatectomy combined with right hepatic artery reconstruction for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. PATIENT AND METHODS: The patient was a 60-year-old male who presented with obstructive jaundice. The imaging examination showed that the confluence of left and right hepatic ducts and the wall of common hepatic duct were thickened, the local lumen was narrowed, the intrahepatic bile duct was dilated, and the right hepatic artery was invaded by tumors nearly 2.3 centimeters. Left hepatectomy with total caudate lobectomy, resection with reconstruction of right hepatic artery, hilar lymphadenectomy, and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy were performed. RESULTS: The operation time was 345 min, and the amount of bleeding was about 400 ml. There was no blood transfusion. The pathology showed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, with negative margins of common bile duct and right hepatic duct, and negative results of all lymph nodes. The patient's recovery was uneventful and he was discharged on postoperative day 14. The patient was disease free at 12-month follow-up evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic artery resection and reconstruction procedure is safe and feasible for hilar cholangiocarcinoma in a highly tertiary hepatobiliary center.


Subject(s)
Bile Duct Neoplasms , Cholangiocarcinoma , Klatskin Tumor , Male , Humans , Middle Aged , Klatskin Tumor/surgery , Klatskin Tumor/pathology , Hepatectomy/methods , Hepatic Artery/surgery , Hepatic Artery/pathology , Liver/surgery , Bile Duct Neoplasms/surgery , Bile Duct Neoplasms/pathology , Cholangiocarcinoma/surgery
14.
BMC Surg ; 24(1): 62, 2024 Feb 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38368356

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) is one of the critical conditions after an orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) and leads to severe problems if not corrected promptly. However, multiple treatments have been proposed for HAT, in which surgical revascularization with either auto-hepatic conduit interposition (AHCI) or revision of the anastomosis is more familiar indeed indicated for some patients and in specific situations. In this study, we want to evaluate the success and outcomes of treating early HAT (E-HAT), which defines HAT within 30 days after OLT with either of the surgical revascularization techniques. METHOD: In this retrospective study, we collected information from the medical records of patients who underwent either of the surgical revascularization procedures for E-HAT after OLT. Patients who needed early retransplantation (RT) or died without surgical intervention for E-HAT were excluded. Demographic data, OLT surgery information, and data regarding E-HAT were gathered. The study outcomes were secondary management for E-HAT in case of improper inflow, biliary complications (BC), RT, and death. RESULTS: A total of 37 adult patients with E-HAT after OLT included in this study. These E-HATs were diagnosed within a mean of 4.6 ± 3.6 days after OLT. Two patients had their HA revised for the initial management of E-HAT; however, it changed to AHCI intraoperatively and finally needed RT. Two and nine patients from the AHCI and revision groups had re-thrombosis (12.5% vs. 47.3%, respectively, p = 0.03). RT was used to manage rethrombosis in all patients of AHCI and two patients of the revision group (22.2%). In comparison to the AHCI, revision group had statistically insignificant higher rates of BC (47.4% vs. 31.2%); however, RT for nonvascular etiologies (12.5% vs. 5.3%) and death (12.5% vs. 10.5%) were nonsignificantly higher in AHCI group. All patients with more than one HA exploration who were in the revision group had BC; however, 28.5% of patients with just one HA exploration experienced BC (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Arterial conduit interposition seems a better approach for the initial management of E-HAT in comparison to revision of the HA anastomosis due to the lower risk of re-thrombosis and the number of HA explorations; indeed, BC, RT, and death remain because they are somewhat related to the ischemic event of E-HAT than to a surgical treatment itself.


Subject(s)
Hepatic Artery , Thrombosis , Adult , Humans , Hepatic Artery/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Liver/surgery , Thrombosis/etiology , Thrombosis/surgery , Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects
15.
Liver Transpl ; 30(6): 628-639, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38300692

ABSTRACT

Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) is a common cause of graft loss in living-donor liver transplantation, occurring in ~2.5%-8% of patients. Some right lobe grafts have 2 hepatic arteries (HAs), and the optimal reconstruction technique remains controversial. This study aimed to identify risk factors for HAT and to evaluate the efficacy of reconstructing 2 HAs in right lobe grafts. This retrospective, single-center study analyzed 1601 living-donor liver transplantation recipients with a right liver graft and divided them into 1 HA (n = 1524) and 2 HA (n = 77) groups. The reconstruction of all HAs was performed using a microscope with an interrupted suture. The primary outcome was any HAT event. Of the 1601 patients, 37.8% had a history of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, and 130 underwent pretransplant hepatectomy. Extra-anatomical arterial reconstruction was performed in 38 cases (2.4%). HAT occurred in 1.2% of patients (20/1601) who underwent surgical revascularization. In the multivariate analysis, undergoing pretransplant hepatectomy ( p = 0.008), having a female donor ( p = 0.02), having a smaller graft-to-recipient weight ratio ( p = 0.002), and undergoing extra-anatomical reconstruction ( p = 0.001) were identified as risk factors for HAT. However, having 2 HA openings in right liver grafts was not a risk factor for HAT in our series. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no significant difference in graft survival and patient survival rates between the 1 HA and 2 HA groups ( p = 0.09, p = 0.97). In our series, although the smaller HA in the 2 HA group should increase the risk of HAT, HAT did not occur in this group. Therefore, reconstructing both HAs when possible may be a reasonable approach in living-donor liver transplantation using a right liver graft with 2 HA openings.


Subject(s)
Graft Survival , Hepatectomy , Hepatic Artery , Liver Transplantation , Living Donors , Thrombosis , Humans , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Liver Transplantation/methods , Hepatic Artery/surgery , Female , Male , Retrospective Studies , Thrombosis/etiology , Thrombosis/epidemiology , Thrombosis/surgery , Middle Aged , Adult , Risk Factors , Hepatectomy/methods , Hepatectomy/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Liver/surgery , Liver/blood supply , Plastic Surgery Procedures/adverse effects , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Aged
16.
Surg Radiol Anat ; 46(2): 231-233, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38238595

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Knowing the anatomical variation of the coeliac trunk (CT) and its detailed interpretation in the preoperative period is important for the prevention of iatrogenic injury during liver surgery or endovascular intervention on the coeliac trunk and its branches. METHODS: A diagnostic abdominal computed tomography angiography (CTA) was performed in a 61-year-old male patient, who was investigated for a liver cancer and chemoembolization was planned. RESULTS: CTA reveals that right hepatic artery (RHA) arises directly from the abdominal aorta, at the level of CT. This vessel coursing to the right hepatic lobe, functioning therefore as a replaced right hepatic artery (RRHA). Also, the left gastric artery (LGA) arises directly from the abdominal aorta. This patient successfully underwent chemoembolization from RRHA. CONCLUSION: We presented a case of new anatomical variation involving the origination of RRHA and LGA from the abdominal aorta.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Chemoembolization, Therapeutic , Liver Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Aorta, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Gastric Artery , Hepatic Artery/diagnostic imaging , Hepatic Artery/surgery , Liver Neoplasms/therapy
17.
HPB (Oxford) ; 26(4): 476-485, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38195309

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate whether pedicled ligament flaps (PLF) covering around the hepatic and gastroduodenal artery stump can provide better clinical outcomes in pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search of databases (inception to January 2023) to identify studies comparing PD with or without PLF covering the skeletonized arteries. The perioperative and postoperative outcomes were compared. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed-effects models. RESULTS: Ten studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Six studies with 3538 patients met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. Patients in the PLF group had a significantly lower rate of PPH from the hepatic artery or gastroduodenal artery stump (H/G PPH) (OR: 0.41; 95 % CI, 0.22-0.75; P < 0.01) and overall PPH (OR: 0.65; 95 % CI, 0.46-0.93; P = 0.02). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of morbidity, grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula (B/C POPF), delayed gastric emptying (DGE), reoperation, or mortality. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic pedicled ligament flaps covering around the skeletonized arteries significantly reduced overall PPH and H/G PPH, and it seemed to have no obvious influence on other complications.


Subject(s)
Hepatic Artery , Pancreaticoduodenectomy , Humans , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/adverse effects , Hepatic Artery/surgery , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Hemorrhage , Pancreatic Fistula/surgery , Ligaments/surgery
18.
Pediatr Transplant ; 28(1): e14516, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37550273

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) is a reported complication of 5%-10% of pediatric liver transplantations, rates 3-4 times that seen in adults. Early HAT (seen within 14 days after transplant) can lead to severe allograft damage and possible urgent re-transplantation. In this report, we present our analysis of HAT in pediatric liver transplant from a national clinical database and examine the association of HAT with anticoagulant or antiplatelet medication administered in the post-operative period. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Pediatric Health Information System database maintained by the Children's Hospital Association. For each liver transplant recipient identified in a 10-year period, diagnosis, demographic, and medication data were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Our findings showed an average rate of HAT of 6.3% across 31 centers. Anticoagulant and antiplatelet medication strategies varied distinctly among and even within centers, likely due to the fact there are no consensus guidelines. Notably, in centers with similar medication usage, HAT rates continue to vary. At the patient level, use of aspirin within the first 72 h of transplantation was associated with a decreased risk of HAT, consistent with other reports in the literature. CONCLUSION: We suggest that concerted efforts to standardize anticoagulation approaches in pediatric liver transplant may be of benefit in the prevention of HAT. A prospective multi-institutional study of regimen-possibly including aspirin-following transplantation could have significant value.


Subject(s)
Liver Diseases , Liver Transplantation , Thrombosis , Adult , Child , Humans , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Hepatic Artery/surgery , Prospective Studies , Liver Diseases/complications , Aspirin/therapeutic use , Thrombosis/etiology , Thrombosis/prevention & control , Thrombosis/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies
19.
Asian J Endosc Surg ; 17(1): e13268, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38093466

ABSTRACT

Understanding anatomical anomalies of the branch of the celiac artery for safe gastrectomy is important. We report a case of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D1+ lymph node dissection for early gastric cancer with a vascular anatomical anomaly of the celiac artery. A 45-year-old woman was referred to our hospital because of early gastric cancer. Computed tomography showed an anatomical variation of the gastroduodenal artery, which branched from the celiac artery. The celiac artery also branched into the left gastric artery, the splenic artery, and the common hepatic artery. Preoperative understanding of an unusual branch of the celiac artery enabled a safe laparoscopic surgery. There were no postoperative complications. The Adachi classification or Michel classification is used for an anatomical anomaly of the celiac artery, but to the best of our knowledge, this case has not been previously classified and is the first reported case.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Abnormalities , Laparoscopy , Stomach Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Celiac Artery/diagnostic imaging , Celiac Artery/surgery , Celiac Artery/pathology , Hepatic Artery/surgery , Hepatic Artery/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Gastrectomy/methods , Splenic Artery/pathology , Cardiovascular Abnormalities/surgery
20.
Minerva Surg ; 79(1): 82-91, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37955856

ABSTRACT

We investigated the outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy in the presence of an aberrant right hepatic artery (aRHA). We systematically reviewed Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science until April 2023 for studies comparing pancreaticoduodenectomy outcomes with and without aRHA. Endpoints included postoperative mortality, R0 resection margins, pancreatic fistulae, hemorrhage, biliary leak/fistulae, delayed gastric emptying, operative duration, and blood loss. Eight retrospective studies involving 1514 patients were included. The risk ratio (RR) for postoperative mortality and odds ratio (OR) for R0 resection between the aRHA and normal anatomy groups were 1.37 (95%CI:0.74-256) (I2=0%, P=0.99) and 1.03 (95%CI:0.67-1.59) (I2=10%, P=0.35). Besides a longer operative duration in the aRHA group, mean difference (MD) 54.64 (95% CI: 8.51-100.77) (I2=94%, P<0.01), there were no significant differences in secondary endpoints. Meta-regression revealed a significant association between aRHA reconstruction and postoperative mortality (ß=0.0179, P<0.01). This review displayed non-statistically significant differences in terms of surgical and oncological outcomes between patients with aRHA and patients with normal hepatic artery anatomy undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. However, the observed trend of increased postoperative mortality in patients with aRHA, combined with extended surgical duration and the link between aRHA reconstruction and postoperative mortality, prevents drawing definitive conclusions. Further research through high-quality studies is warranted.


Subject(s)
Pancreatic Neoplasms , Pancreaticoduodenectomy , Humans , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Hepatic Artery/surgery , Hepatic Artery/pathology , Pancreatic Fistula/etiology , Pancreatic Fistula/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...