Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.681
Filter
1.
Pan Afr Med J ; 47: 160, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38974696

ABSTRACT

Introduction: recent worldwide data has shown a concerning decline in the number of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) related admissions and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We suspected a similar trend at Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital (CHBAH). Methods: a retrospective descriptive study was conducted to evaluate and compare all ACS-related admissions to the cardiac care unit (CCU) at CHBAH in the pre-COVID-19 (November 2019 to March 2020) and during COVID-19 periods (April 2020 to August 2020). Results: the study comprised 182 patients with a mean age of 57.9 ±10.9 years (22.5% females). Of these, 108 (59.32%) patients were admitted in the pre-COVID-19 period and 74 (40.66%) during COVID-19 (p=0.0109). During the pre-COVID-19 period, 42.9% of patients had ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), 39.2% with non-ST-segment -elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and unstable angina (UA) was noted in 18.52%. In contrast, STEMI was noted in 50%, NSTEMI in 43.24% and UA in 6.76% of patients during the COVID-19 period. A statistically significant difference in STEMI and NSTEMI-related admissions was not noted, however, there was a greater number of admissions for UA during the pre-COVID-19 period (18.52% vs 6.76%, P =0.013). Only a third of the patients with STEMI received thrombolysis during the pre-and COVID-19 periods (30.4% vs 37.8%, P=0.47). No difference in the number of PCI procedures was noted between the pre-and during the COVID-19 periods (78.7% vs 72.9%, P=0.37). Conclusion: there was a difference in overall ACS admissions to the CCU between pre-and during COVID-19 periods, however no difference between STEMI and NSTEMI in both periods. A higher number of UA admissions was noted during the pre-COVID-19 period. During both periods, the use of thrombolysis was low for STEMI and no difference in PCI was noted.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , COVID-19 , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , Female , Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Acute Coronary Syndrome/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Aged , South Africa/epidemiology , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/statistics & numerical data , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Hospitals, Urban/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Coronary Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Academic Medical Centers/statistics & numerical data
2.
Cent Eur J Public Health ; 32(2): 125-131, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39069316

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Measles cases are increasing remarkably in our country as well as all over the world. In this study, it was aimed to examine the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of measles cases detected in our hospital, as well as the measles seroprevalence in our region. METHODS: A total of 7,452 individuals whose measles IgG and/or IgM antibodies were studied between December 2021 and March 2023 in the Medical Virology Laboratory in Basaksehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital were included in this retrospective study. Measles IgG and IgM antibodies were analysed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Demographic information, clinical symptoms and laboratory data of the participants were obtained from the hospital's electronic medical records. RESULTS: A total of 102 measles cases were identified between December 2021 and March 2023. Of these cases, 77 (75.5%) patients were ≤ 18 years old. Of the 73 measles cases with vaccination information, 90% were unvaccinated. The measles seroprevalence rate was 72.8%. The lowest seroprevalence rate (4.8%) among the age groups was found in 8-11-month-old babies, the highest cases rate (35.7%) was detected in this age group. It was determined that measles immunity increased with age (r = 0.276, p < 0.001) and was over 89.3% over the age of 30. CONCLUSIONS: Measles immunity is insufficient in our region and measles remains an important public health problem until the age of 18. The recent increase in measles cases in our country and around the world shows that current vaccination programmes need to be implemented more decisively and strictly.


Subject(s)
Measles , Humans , Measles/epidemiology , Measles/prevention & control , Female , Male , Retrospective Studies , Infant , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Turkey/epidemiology , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Adult , Hospitals, Urban/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin M/blood , Measles Vaccine/administration & dosage
3.
J Surg Orthop Adv ; 33(2): 61-67, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38995058

ABSTRACT

Rural patients have poorer health indicators, including higher risk of developing osteoarthritis. The objective of this study is to compare rural patients undergoing primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) at rural hospitals with those undergoing primary TJA at urban hospitals with regards to demographics, comorbidities, and complications and to determine the preferred location of care for rural patients. Data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample between 2016 and 2018 were analyzed. Demographics, comorbidities, inpatient complications, hospital length of stay, inpatient mortality, and discharge disposition were compared between rural patients who underwent TJA at rural hospitals and urban hospitals. Rural patients undergoing primary TJA in rural hospitals were more likely to be women, to be treated in the South, to have Medicaid payer status, to have dementia, diabetes mellitus, lung disease, and postoperative pulmonary complications, and to have a longer hospital length of stay. Those patients were also less likely to have baseline obesity, heart disease, kidney disease, liver disease, cancer, postoperative infection, and cardiovascular complications, and were less likely to be discharged home. Rural patients undergoing primary TJA tend to pursue surgery in their rural hospital when their comorbidity profile is manageable. These patients get their surgery performed in an urban setting when they have the means for travel and cost, and when their comorbidity profile is more complicated, requiring more specialized care, Rural patients are choosing to undergo their primary TJA in urban hospitals as opposed to their local rural hospitals. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 33(2):061-067, 2024).


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Length of Stay , Humans , Female , Male , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , United States/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Hospitals, Urban/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Rural/statistics & numerical data , Comorbidity , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data
4.
JCO Precis Oncol ; 8: e2300699, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38935898

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Patients with hereditary cancer syndromes (HCS) have a high lifetime risk of developing cancer. Historically underserved populations have lower rates of genetic evaluation. We sought to characterize demographic factors that are associated with undergoing HCS evaluation in an urban safety-net patient population. METHODS: All patients who met inclusion criteria for this study from 2016 to 2021 at an urban safety-net hospital were included in this analysis. Inclusion criteria were pathologically confirmed breast, ovarian/fallopian tube, colon, pancreatic, and prostate cancers. Patients also qualified for hereditary breast and ovarian cancers or Lynch syndrome on the basis of National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Institutional review board approval was obtained. Demographic and oncologic data were collected through retrospective chart review. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were constructed. RESULTS: Of the 637 patients included, 40% underwent genetic testing. Variables associated with receiving genetic testing on univariable analysis included patients living at the time of data collection, female sex, Latinx ethnicity, Spanish language, family history of cancer, and referral for genetic testing. Patients identifying as Black, having Medicare, having pancreatic or prostate cancer, having stage IV disease, having Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) prognostic score ≥1, having medium or high Charlson comorbidity index, with current or previous cigarette use, and with previous alcohol use were negatively associated with testing. On multivariable modeling, family history of cancer was positively associated with testing. Patients identifying as Black, having colon or prostate cancer, and having ECOG score of 2 had significantly lower association with genetic testing. CONCLUSION: Uptake of HCS was lower in patients identifying as Black, those with colon or prostate cancer, and those with an ECOG score of 2. Efforts to increase HCS testing in these patients will be important to advance equitable cancer care.


Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer , Safety-net Providers , Humans , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Urban/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Genetic Testing/statistics & numerical data , Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary/genetics , Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary/diagnosis , Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary/epidemiology
5.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 39(1): 91, 2024 Jun 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38867089

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Surgery wait times after diagnosis of appendicitis are an important factor influencing the success of a patient's treatment. The proposed study will be a quantitative multicenter retrospective cohort design with the primary aim of assessing the difference between appendicectomy wait times between rural and urban hospitals in Western Australia and the effect of this on operative outcomes. Selected outcome measures will be examined by time from initial presentation at an emergency department to the patient being diagnosed and then time of diagnosis to surgery being performed. The secondary aim is to compare rates of negative appendicectomies between hospitals. METHODS: Appendicectomy patients will be identified from operating room register by medical student data collectors; then, each respective hospital's emergency room data collection will subsequently be accessed to complete case report forms based on demographics and clinical findings, pre-operative investigations, and management and follow-up. Case report forms with > 95% completeness will be accepted for pooled analysis. The expected duration of retrospective data collection will be 8 months. This study RGS6483 has received HREC approval by the Royal Perth Hospital HREC Ethics Committee, with a waiver of consent obtained and the HREC was notified of amendments to the protocol made on April 21, 2024. Dissemination of results. Data will be collected and stored online through a secure server running the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) web application. No patient-identifiable data will be entered into the system. Results will subsequently be shared via scientific journal publication and presentation at relevant meetings.


Subject(s)
Appendectomy , Humans , Appendectomy/statistics & numerical data , Western Australia , Treatment Outcome , Appendicitis/surgery , Geography , Waiting Lists , Time Factors , Time-to-Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Urban/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies
6.
J Surg Res ; 300: 279-286, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38833754

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Little research has focused on assessing the mortality for fall height based on field-relevant categories like falls from greater than standing (FFGS), falls from standing (FFS), and falls from less than standing. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included patients evaluated for a fall incident at an urban Level I Trauma Center or included in Medical Examiner's log from January 1, 2015, to June 31, 2017. Descriptive statistics characterized the sample based on demographic variables such as age, race, sex, and insurance type, as well as injury characteristics like relative fall height, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), traumatic brain injury, intensive care unit length of stay, and mortality. Bivariate analysis included Chi-square tests for categorical variables and Student t-tests for continuous variables. Subsequent multiple logistic regression modeled significant variables from bivariate analyses, including age, race, insurance status, fall height, ISS, and GCS. RESULTS: When adjusting for sex, age, race, insurance, ISS, and GCS, adults ≥65 who FFS had 1.93 times the odds of mortality than those who FFGS. However, those <65 who FFGS had 3.12 times the odds of mortality than those who FFS. Additionally, commercial insurance was not protective across age groups. CONCLUSIONS: The mortality for FFS may be higher than FFGS under certain circumstances, particularly among those ≥65 y. Therefore, prehospital collection should include accurate assessment of fall height and surface (i.e., water, concrete). Lastly, commercial insurance was likely a proxy for industrial falls, accounting for the surprising lack of protection against mortality.


Subject(s)
Accidental Falls , Trauma Centers , Humans , Male , Female , Accidental Falls/mortality , Accidental Falls/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Trauma Centers/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Aged , Adult , Injury Severity Score , Young Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Adolescent , Hospitals, Urban/statistics & numerical data , Wounds and Injuries/mortality , Glasgow Coma Scale
7.
Anaesth Intensive Care ; 52(4): 214-222, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38663872

ABSTRACT

This multicentre, retrospective medical record audit evaluated opioid analgesia prescribing within a Victorian metropolitan public hospital network. The study included all surgical patients discharged between January 2012 and December 2020 with one or more discharge prescriptions from three metropolitan hospitals (n = 117,989). The main outcome measures were mean oral morphine equivalent daily dose (OMEDD), mean number of opioid types and proportion of patients prescribed one or more slow-release opioids on discharge.Total opioid prescribing (mean OMEDD) peaked in 2013. Between 2017 and 2020 there was a trend towards prescribing fewer opioids on discharge. Over the study period, there was decreasing prescription of codeine and increasing prescription of oxycodone and tapentadol. The proportion of patients prescribed slow-release opioids increased in the earlier years of the study, reaching a peak of 20.6% in 2017. Since 2017 there has been a rapid reduction in the prescription of slow-release opioids.Subanalysis was undertaken to evaluate key changes in the opioid prescribing landscape in the health network. The removal of default opioid pack sizes in the electronic medication management system (December 2014) and the release of the Faculty of Pain Medicine-Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists' statement regarding the use of opioid analgesics in patients with chronic non-cancer pain (March 2018) were associated with significant reductions in mean OMEDD prescribed on discharge (136 mg vs 122 mg and 120 mg vs 85.4 mg, respectively, P < 0.001).In conclusion, the quantity of opioids prescribed on discharge in this patient group peaked in 2013 and has been decreasing since.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid , Patient Discharge , Humans , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Aged , Hospitals, Urban/statistics & numerical data , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy
8.
Ear Nose Throat J ; 103(1_suppl): 76S-84S, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38488168

ABSTRACT

Objective: To describe associations between patients' demographic characteristics and access to telemedicine services in an urban tertiary academic medical system across the COVID-19 pandemic, and to identify potential barriers to access. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at a single-center tertiary academic medical center. The study included adult patients undergoing outpatient otolaryngologic care in person or via telemedicine during 8 week timeframes: before the pandemic, at the onset of the pandemic, and during later parts of the pandemic. Patients were characterized by age, sex, race, insurance type, primary language, portal activation status, income estimate, and visit type. Where appropriate, chi-squared tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and logistic regression were used to compare demographic factors between the cohorts. Results: A total of 14,240 unique patients [median age, 58 years (range, 18-107 years); 56.5% were female] resulting in a total of 29,457 visits (94.8% in-person and 5.2% telemedicine) were analyzed. Patients seen in person were older than those using telemedicine. Telemedicine visits included a higher proportion of patients with private insurance, and fewer patients with government or no insurance compared to in-person visits. Race, income, and English as primary language were not found to have a significant effect on telemedicine use. Conclusion: In an urban tertiary medical center, we found significant differences in sociodemographic characteristics between patients who accessed otolaryngologic care in person versus via telemedicine through different phases of the COVID pandemic, reflecting possible barriers to care associated with telemedicine. Further studies are needed to develop interventions to improve access.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Health Services Accessibility , Otolaryngology , Telemedicine , Tertiary Care Centers , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Telemedicine/statistics & numerical data , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Adolescent , Aged, 80 and over , Otolaryngology/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemics , Hospitals, Urban/statistics & numerical data , Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases/therapy
9.
J Vasc Surg ; 80(1): 199-203, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38360191

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Common femoral endarterectomy (CFE) comprises the current standard-of-care for symptomatic common femoral artery occlusive disease. Although it provides effective inflow revascularization via a single incision, it remains an invasive procedure in an often-frail patient population. The purpose of this retrospective clinical study was to assess the morbidity and mortality of CFE in a contemporary cohort. METHODS: Consecutive CFEs performed at a large, urban hospital were reviewed. Six-month mortality, local complications (hematoma, lymphatic leak, pseudoaneurysm, wound infection, and/or dehiscence), and systemic complications were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: A total of 129 isolated CFEs were performed over 7 years for claudication (36%), rest pain (16%), tissue loss (29%), or acute on chronic limb ischemia (21%). Mean age was 75 ± 9 years, and 68% of patients were male. Comorbidities were prevalent, including coronary artery disease (54%), diabetes (41%), chronic pulmonary disease (25%), and congestive heart failure (22%). The majority of CFEs were performed under general anesthesia (98%) with patch angioplasty using bovine pericardium (73% vs 27% Dacron). Twenty-two patients (17%) sustained local complications following the procedure; their occurrence was significantly associated with obesity (P = .002) but no technical or operative factors. Nineteen patients (15%) sustained serious systemic complications; their occurrence was significantly associated with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (P < .001), and a high American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class (P = .002). By 6 months, 17 patients (13%) had died. Being on dialysis, presenting with chronic limb-threatening ischemia, and being in a high ASA class at the time of operation were all associated with 6-month mortality; a high ASA class at the time of operation was independently predictive of mortality (odds ratio, 3.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-9.24; P = .044). CONCLUSIONS: Although commonly performed, CFE is not a benign vascular procedure. Disease presentation, anesthetic risk, and expected longevity play an important role in clinical outcomes. Evolving endovascular approaches to the common femoral artery could serve to reduce morbidity and mortality in the future.


Subject(s)
Endarterectomy , Femoral Artery , Humans , Male , Female , Endarterectomy/adverse effects , Endarterectomy/mortality , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Femoral Artery/surgery , Risk Factors , Aged, 80 and over , Treatment Outcome , Time Factors , Comorbidity , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Intermittent Claudication/surgery , Intermittent Claudication/mortality , Risk Assessment , Peripheral Arterial Disease/surgery , Peripheral Arterial Disease/mortality , Ischemia/mortality , Ischemia/surgery , Hospitals, Urban/statistics & numerical data , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/surgery , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/mortality , Middle Aged
10.
Ann Am Thorac Soc ; 21(5): 774-781, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38294224

ABSTRACT

Rationale: Intermediate care (also termed "step-down" or "moderate care") has been proposed as a lower cost alternative to care for patients who may not clearly benefit from intensive care unit admission. Intermediate care units may be appealing to hospitals in financial crisis, including those in rural areas. Outcomes of patients receiving intermediate care are not widely described. Objectives: To examine relationships among rurality, location of care, and mortality for mechanically ventilated patients. Methods: Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older who received invasive mechanical ventilation between 2010 and 2019 were included. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the association between admission to a rural or an urban hospital and 30-day mortality, with separate analyses for patients in general, intermediate, and intensive care. Models were adjusted for age, sex, area deprivation index, primary diagnosis, severity of illness, year, comorbidities, and hospital volume. Results: There were 2,752,492 hospitalizations for patients receiving mechanical ventilation from 2010 to 2019, and 193,745 patients (7.0%) were in rural hospitals. The proportion of patients in rural intermediate care increased from 4.1% in 2010 to 6.3% in 2019. Patient admissions to urban hospitals remained relatively stable. Patients in rural and urban intensive care units had similar adjusted 30-day mortality, at 46.7% (adjusted absolute risk difference -0.1% [95% confidence interval, -0.7% to 0.6%]; P = 0.88). However, adjusted 30-day mortality for patients in rural intermediate care was significantly higher (36.9%) than for patients in urban intermediate care (31.3%) (adjusted absolute risk difference 5.6% [95% confidence interval, 3.7% to 7.6%]; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Hospitalization in rural intermediate care was associated with increased mortality. There is a need to better understand how intermediate care is used across hospitals and to carefully evaluate the types of patients admitted to intermediate care units.


Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units , Medicare , Respiration, Artificial , Humans , Female , Male , Aged , Respiration, Artificial/statistics & numerical data , United States/epidemiology , Aged, 80 and over , Medicare/statistics & numerical data , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Mortality/trends , Hospitals, Urban/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Rural/statistics & numerical data , Critical Care/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Logistic Models , Intermediate Care Facilities/statistics & numerical data
11.
J Subst Use Addict Treat ; 160: 209280, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38142042

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Hospitals are an ideal setting to stage opioid-related interventions with patients who are hospitalized due to overdose or other substance use-related complications. Transitional opioid programs-which initiate care and provide linkages upon discharge, such as screening, initiation of medications for opioid use disorder, and addiction consult services-have become the gold standard, but implementation has been uneven. The purpose of this study was to assess disparities in the availability of hospital-based transitional opioid programs, across rural and urban hospital settings in the United States. METHODS: Using hospital administrative data paired with county-level demographic data, we conducted bivariate and regression analyses to assess rural-urban differences in the availability of transitional opioid services including screening, addiction consult services, and MOUD in U.S general medical centers, controlling for hospital- and community-level factors. Our sample included 2846 general medical hospitals that completed the 2021 American Hospital Association (AHA) Annual Survey of Hospitals. Our primary outcomes were five self-reported measures: whether the hospital provided screening in the ED; provided screening in the inpatient setting; whether the hospital provided addiction consult services in the ED; provided addiction consult services in the inpatient setting; and whether the hospital provided medications for opioid use disorder. RESULTS: Rural hospitals did not have lower odds of screening for OUD or other SUDs than urban hospitals, but both micropolitan rural counties and noncore rural counties had significantly lower odds of having addiction consult services in either the ED (OR: 0.74, 95 % CI: 0.58, 0.95; OR: 0.68, 95 % CI: 0.50, 0.91) or inpatient setting (OR: 0.76, 95 % CI: 0.59, 0.97; OR: 0.68, 95 % CI: 0.50, 0.93), respectively, or of offering MOUD (OR: 0.69, 95 % CI: 0.52, 0.90; OR: 0.52, 95 % CI: 0.37, 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that evidence-based interventions, such as medications for opioid use disorder and addiction consult services, are less often available in rural hospitals, which may contribute to rural-urban disparities in health outcomes secondary to OUD. A priority for population health improvement should be developing implementation strategies to support rural hospital adoption of transitional opioid programs.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility , Healthcare Disparities , Opioid-Related Disorders , Referral and Consultation , Humans , Opioid-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Opioid-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy , United States/epidemiology , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Urban/statistics & numerical data , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data , Mass Screening , Hospitals, Rural/statistics & numerical data
12.
BMC Pediatr ; 22(1): 441, 2022 07 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35864482

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mortality among under-five children in Tanzania remains high. While early presentation for treatment increases likelihood of survival, delays to care are common and factors causing delay to presentation among critically ill children are unknown. In this study delay was defined as presentation to the emergency department of tertially hospital i.e. Muhimbili National Hospital, more than 48 h from the onset of the index illness. METHODOLOGY: This was a prospective cohort study of critically ill children aged 28 days to 14 years attending emergency department at Muhimbili National Hospital in Tanzania from September 2019 to January 2020. We documented demographics, time to ED presentation, ED interventions and 30-day outcome. The primary outcome was the association of delay with mortality and secondary outcomes were predictors of delay among critically ill paediatric patients. Logistic regression and relative risk were calculated to measure the strength of the predictor and the relationship between delay and mortality respectively. RESULTS: We enrolled 440 (59.1%) critically ill children, their median age was 12 [IQR = 9-60] months and 63.9% were males. The median time to Emergency Department arrival was 3 days [IQR = 1-5] and more than half (56.6%) of critically ill children presented to Emergency Department in > 48 h whereby being an infant, self-referral and belonging to poor family were independent predictors of delay. Infants and those referred from other facilities had 2.4(95% CI 1.4-4.0) and 1.8(95% CI 1.1-2.8) times increased odds of presenting late to the Emergency Department respectively. The overall 30-day in-hospital mortality was 26.5% in which those who presented late were 1.3 more likely to die than those who presented early (RR = 1.3, CI: 0.9-1.9). Majority died > 24 h of Emergency Department arrival (P-value = 0.021). CONCLUSION: The risk of in-hospital mortality among children who presented to the ED later than 48 h after onset of illness was 1.3 times higher than for children who presented earlier than 48 h. It could be anywhere from 10% lower to 90% higher than the point estimate. However, the effect size was statistically not significant since the confidence interval included the null value Qualitative and time-motion studies are needed to evaluate the care pathway of critically ill pediatric patients to identify preventable delays in care.


Subject(s)
Critical Illness , Emergency Service, Hospital , Hospitals, Urban , Child , Child, Preschool , Critical Illness/epidemiology , Critical Illness/mortality , Critical Illness/therapy , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Female , Hospital Mortality , Hospitals, Urban/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Prospective Studies , Tanzania/epidemiology , Time Factors
13.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 79(3): 267-279, 2022 01 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35057913

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: U.S. policy efforts have focused on reducing rural-urban health inequities. However, it is unclear whether gaps in care and outcomes remain among older adults with acute cardiovascular conditions. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate rural-urban differences in procedural care and mortality for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF), and ischemic stroke. METHODS: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged ≥65 years with acute cardiovascular conditions from 2016 to 2018. Cox proportional hazards models with random hospital intercepts were fit to examine the association of presenting to a rural (vs urban) hospital and 30- and 90-day patient-level mortality. RESULTS: There were 2,182,903 Medicare patients hospitalized with AMI, HF, or ischemic stroke from 2016 to 2018. Patients with AMI were less likely to undergo cardiac catherization (49.7% vs 63.6%, P < 0.001), percutaneous coronary intervention (42.1% vs 45.7%, P < 0.001) or coronary artery bypass graft (9.0% vs 10.2%, P < 0.001) within 30 days at rural versus urban hospitals. Thrombolysis rates (3.1% vs 10.1%, P < 0.001) and endovascular therapy (1.8% vs 3.6%, P < 0.001) for ischemic stroke were lower at rural hospitals. After adjustment for demographics and clinical comorbidities, the 30-day mortality HR was significantly higher among patients presenting to rural hospitals for AMI (HR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.12), HF (HR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.13 to 1.16), and ischemic stroke (HR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.18 to 1.22), with similar patterns at 90 days. These differences were most pronounced for the subset of critical access hospitals that serve remote, rural areas. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical, public health, and policy efforts are needed to improve rural-urban gaps in care and outcomes for acute cardiovascular conditions.


Subject(s)
Healthcare Disparities , Heart Failure/mortality , Hospitals, Rural/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Urban/statistics & numerical data , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Stroke/mortality , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiac Catheterization/statistics & numerical data , Coronary Artery Bypass/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Endovascular Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Heart Failure/therapy , Humans , Male , Medicare , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Rural Population , Stroke/therapy , Thrombolytic Therapy/statistics & numerical data , United States/epidemiology , Urban Population
14.
Am J Surg ; 223(1): 112-119, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34425989

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Structural factors limiting access to surgical care require elucidation. We hypothesize transportation time to hospitals with surgical capacity disproportionately burdens minority populations. METHODS: We identified hospitals with surgical capacity within a 20-mile radius of our city center. Using geocoding, we estimated travel times from each census tract to the nearest facility by car or public bus. RESULTS: For 143 tracts within the county, drive time was 13 ± 4 min and bus time was 33 ± 15 min. Only 41.2% of the population had a facility within 30 min by bus; access was further diminished for those with minority race/ethnicity and/or no insurance. Bus time was associated with percent minority population in a census tract: for each 10% increase in minority population there was a 4.3-min increase in bus time (p < 0.001) when controlling for socioeconomic status and other characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Geographic information systems analysis has potential to identify communities with disproportionate burden to access surgical services.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Urban/statistics & numerical data , Transportation/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Census Tract , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Humans , Social Determinants of Health/economics , Social Determinants of Health/statistics & numerical data , Socioeconomic Factors , Time Factors , Transportation/economics , Transportation/methods
15.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 15(11): e0009953, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34780462

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In April 2018, a diarrhea epidemic broke out in Dhaka city and adjoining areas, which continued through May. The Dhaka Hospital of the International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), a dedicated diarrheal disease hospital, had a large upsurge in patient visits during the epidemic. An enhanced understanding of the epidemiology of this epidemic may help health-related professionals better prepare for such events in the future. This study examined the microbial etiology and non-pathogen factors associated with diarrhea during the epidemic. The study also evaluated the patients' presentation and clinical course and estimated the potential mortality averted by treating patients during the epidemic. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Data from the patients who were treated at Dhaka Hospital during the diarrhea epidemic between April 2 and May 12, 2018 and were enrolled into the Diarrheal Disease Surveillance System (DDSS) at icddr,b were compared with the DDSS-enrolled patients treated during the seasonally-matched periods in the flanking years using logistic regression. icddr,b Dhaka Hospital treated 29,212 diarrheal patients during the 2018 epidemic period (and 25,950 patients per comparison period on average). Vibrio cholerae was the most common pathogen isolated (7,946 patients; 27%) and associated with diarrhea during the epidemic (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.5, 95% CI: 1.1-2.0). The interaction of Vibrio cholerae with ETEC (AOR 2.7, 95% CI: 1.3-5.9) or Campylobacter (AOR 2.4, 95% CI: 1.1-5.1) was associated with further increased odds of diarrhea during the epidemic. In children under five years old, rotavirus was the most common pathogen (2,029 patients; 26%). Those who were adolescents (AOR 2.0, 95% CI: 1.3-3.1) and young adults (AOR 1.9, 95% CI: 1.4-2.5) compared to children younger than five years, resided within a 10 km radius of Dhaka Hospital (AOR 1.6, 95% CI: 1.1-2.2) compared to those living outside 20 km, borrowed money or relied on aid to pay for the transport to the hospital (AOR 1.6, 95% CI: 1.2-2.0), used tap water (AOR 1.8, 95% CI: 1.4-2.4) for drinking compared to tubewell water, and disposed of the solid waste directly outside the house (AOR 4.0, 95% CI: 2.7-5.9) were more likely to present with diarrhea during the epidemic. During the epidemic, patients were more likely to present with severe dehydration (odds ratio [OR] 1.6, 95% CI: 1.3-2.0) and require inpatient admission (OR 2.5, 95% CI: 1.9-3.3), intravenous rehydration (OR 1.7, 95% CI: 1.4-2.1), and antibiotics (OR 2.2, 95% CI: 1.8-2.7). The in-hospital case fatality rate was low (13 patients; 0.04%), and the hospital averted between 12,523 and 17,265 deaths during the epidemic. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Vibrio cholerae played the primary role in the 2018 diarrhea epidemic in Dhaka. Campylobacter, enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli, and rotavirus had a secondary role. Adolescents and adults, residents of the metropolitan area, and those who were relatively poor and lacked safe water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) practices comprised the most vulnerable groups. Despite the increased disease severity during the epidemic, the case fatality rate was less than 0.1%. icddr,b Dhaka Hospital saved as many as 17,265 lives during the epidemic.


Subject(s)
Diarrhea/epidemiology , Diarrhea/mortality , Adolescent , Adult , Bangladesh/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Diarrhea/microbiology , Diarrhea/virology , Female , Hospitals, Urban/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant , Male , Young Adult
16.
West J Emerg Med ; 22(5): 1051-1059, 2021 Sep 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34546880

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Diverse coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mortalities have been reported but focused on identifying susceptible patients at risk of more severe disease or death. This study aims to investigate the mortality variations of COVID-19 from different hospital settings during different pandemic phases. METHODS: We retrospectively included adult (≥18 years) patients who visited emergency departments (ED) of five hospitals in the state of Texas and who were diagnosed with COVID-19 between March-November 2020. The included hospitals were dichotomized into urban and suburban based on their geographic location. The primary outcome was mortality that occurred either during hospital admission or within 30 days after the index ED visit. We used multivariable logistic regression to investigate the associations between independent variables and outcome. Generalized additive models were employed to explore the mortality variation during different pandemic phases. RESULTS: A total of 1,788 adult patients who tested positive for COVID-19 were included in the study. The median patient age was 54.6 years, and 897 (50%) patients were male. Urban hospitals saw approximately 59.5% of the total patients. A total of 197 patients died after the index ED visit. The analysis indicated visits to the urban hospitals (odds ratio [OR] 2.14, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41, 3.23), from March to April (OR 2.04, 95% CI, 1.08, 3.86), and from August to November (OR 2.15, 95% CI, 1.37, 3.38) were positively associated with mortality. CONCLUSION: Visits to the urban hospitals were associated with a higher risk of mortality in patients with COVID-19 when compared to visits to the suburban hospitals. The mortality risk rebounded and showed significant difference between urban and suburban hospitals since August 2020. Optimal allocation of medical resources may be necessary to bridge this gap in the foreseeable future.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/mortality , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Mortality , Hospitals, Urban/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics , Suburban Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Humans , Male , Medicare , Middle Aged , Residence Characteristics , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , United States/epidemiology
17.
J Am Coll Surg ; 233(6): 764-775.e1, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34438081

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Older patients with frailty syndrome have a greater risk of poor postoperative outcomes. In this study, we used a RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance) framework to implement an assessment tool to identify frail patients and targeted interventions to improve their outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: We implemented a 5-question frailty assessment tool for patients 65 years and older admitted to the general and vascular surgery services from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019. Identified frail patients received evidence-based clinical orders and nursing care plan interventions tailored to optimize recovery. A RE-AIM framework was used to assess implementation effectiveness through provider and nurse surveys, floor audits, and chart review. RESULTS: Of 1,158 patients included in this study, 696 (60.1%) were assessed for frailty. Among these, 611 patients (87.8%) scored as frail or intermediately frail. After implementation, there were significant increases in the completion rates of frailty-specific care orders for frail patients, including delirium precautions (52.1% vs 30.7%; p < 0.001), aspiration precautions (50.0% vs 26.9%; p < 0.001), and avoidance of overnight vitals (32.5% vs 0%). Floor audits, however, showed high variability in completion of care plan components by nursing staff. Multivariate analysis showed significant decreases in 30-day complication rates (odds ratio 0.532; p < 0.001) after implementation. CONCLUSIONS: A frailty assessment was able to identify elderly patients for provision of targeted, evidence-based frailty care. Despite limited uptake of the assessment by providers and completion of care plan components by nursing staff, implementation of the assessment and care interventions was associated with substantial decreases in complications among elderly surgical patients.


Subject(s)
Frailty/diagnosis , Geriatric Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Patient Care Planning/organization & administration , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Vascular Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Frailty/epidemiology , Frailty/therapy , Health Plan Implementation/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Urban/organization & administration , Hospitals, Urban/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Patient Care Planning/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Program Evaluation , Quality Improvement , Risk Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors , Safety-net Providers/organization & administration , Safety-net Providers/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires
18.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(25): e26433, 2021 Jun 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34160433

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: The subclinical severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection rate in hospitals during the pandemic remains unclear. To evaluate the effectiveness of our hospital's current nosocomial infection control measures, we conducted a serological survey of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (immunoglobulin [Ig] G) among the staff of our hospital, which is treating coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients.The study design was cross-sectional. We measured anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG in the participants using a laboratory-based quantitative test (Abbott immunoassay), which has a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 99.6%, respectively. To investigate the factors associated with seropositivity, we also obtained some information from the participants with an anonymous questionnaire. We invited 1133 staff members in our hospital, and 925 (82%) participated. The mean age of the participants was 40.0 ±â€Š11.8 years, and most were women (80.0%). According to job title, there were 149 medical doctors or dentists (16.0%), 489 nurses (52.9%), 140 medical technologists (14.2%), 49 healthcare providers (5.3%), and 98 administrative staff (10.5%). The overall prevalence of seropositivity for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG was 0.43% (4/925), which was similar to the control seroprevalence of 0.54% (16/2970) in the general population in Osaka during the same period according to a government survey conducted with the same assay. Seropositive rates did not significantly differ according to job title, exposure to suspected or confirmed COVID-19 patients, or any other investigated factors.The subclinical SARS-CoV-2 infection rate in our hospital was not higher than that in the general population under our nosocomial infection control measures.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Asymptomatic Infections/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Adult , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/transmission , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hospitals, Urban/organization & administration , Hospitals, Urban/standards , Hospitals, Urban/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Infection Control/organization & administration , Infection Control/standards , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/statistics & numerical data , Japan/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data
19.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(5): e2110084, 2021 05 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34003272

ABSTRACT

Importance: Given the mortality disparities among children and adolescents in rural vs urban areas, the unique health care needs of pediatric patients, and the annual emergency department volume for this patient population, understanding the availability of pediatric emergency physicians (EPs) is important. Information regarding the available pediatric EP workforce is limited, however. Objective: To describe the demographic characteristics, training, board certification, and geographic distribution of the 2020 clinically active pediatric EP workforce in the US. Design, Setting, and Participants: This national cross-sectional study of the 2020 pediatric EP workforce used the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile database, which was linked to American Board of Medical Specialties board certification information. Self-reported training data in the database were analyzed to identify clinically active physicians who self-reported pediatric emergency medicine (EM) as their primary or secondary specialty. The Physician Masterfile data were obtained on March 11, 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: The Physician Masterfile was used to identify all clinically active pediatric EPs in the US. The definition of EM training was completion of an EM program (inclusive of both an EM residency and/or a pediatric EM fellowship) or a combined EM program (internal medicine and EM, family medicine and EM, or pediatrics and EM). Physician location was linked and classified by county-level Urban Influence Codes. Pediatric EP density was calculated and mapped using US Census Bureau population estimates. Results: A total of 2403 clinically active pediatric EPs were working in 2020 (5% of all clinically active emergency physicians), of whom 1357 were women (56%) and the median (interquartile range) age was 46 (40-55) years. The overall pediatric EP population included 1718 physicians (71%) with EM training and 641 (27%) with pediatric training. Overall, 1639 (68%) were board certified in pediatric EM, of whom 1219 (74%) reported EM training and 400 (24%) reported pediatrics training. Nearly all pediatric EPs worked in urban areas (2369 of 2402 [99%]), and pediatric EPs in urban compared with rural areas were younger (median [interquartile range] age, 46 [40-55] years vs 59 [48-65] years). Pediatric EPs who completed their training 20 years ago or more compared with those who completed training more recently were less likely to work in urban settings (633 [97%] vs 0-4 years: 440 [99%], 5-9 years: 547 [99%], or 10-19 years: 723 [99%]; P = .006). Three states had 0 pediatric EPs (Montana, South Dakota, and Wyoming), and 3 states had pediatric EPs in only 1 county (Alaska, New Mexico, and North Dakota). Less than 1% of counties had 4 or more pediatric EPs per 100 000 population. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that almost all pediatric EPs worked in urban areas, leaving rural areas of the US with limited availability of pediatric emergency care. This finding may have profound implications for children and adolescents needing emergency care.


Subject(s)
Hospitals, Rural/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Urban/statistics & numerical data , Pediatric Emergency Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Physicians/supply & distribution , Physicians/statistics & numerical data , Workforce/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hospitals, Rural/supply & distribution , Hospitals, Urban/supply & distribution , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL