Comparative effectiveness trial of metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes in the USA: clinical trial protocol for the multicentre DECIDE study.

INTRODUCTION: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is one of the most common medical complications of pregnancy. Glycaemic control decreases the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes for the affected pregnant individual and the infant exposed in utero. One in four individuals with GDM will require pharmacotherapy to achieve glycaemic control. Injectable insulin has been the mainstay of pharmacotherapy. Oral metformin is an alternative option increasingly used in clinical practice. Both insulin and metformin reduce the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, but comparative effectiveness data from a well-characterised, adequately powered study of a diverse US population remain lacking. Because metformin crosses the placenta, long-term safety data, in particular, the risk of childhood obesity, from exposed children are also needed. In addition, the patient-reported experiences of individuals with GDM requiring pharmacotherapy remain to be characterised, including barriers to and facilitators of metformin versus insulin use. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In a two-arm open-label, pragmatic comparative effectiveness randomised controlled trial, we will determine if metformin is not inferior to insulin in reducing adverse pregnancy outcomes, is comparably safe for exposed individuals and children, and if patient-reported factors, including facilitators of and barriers to use, differ between metformin and insulin. We plan to recruit 1572 pregnant individuals with GDM who need pharmacotherapy at 20 US sites using consistent diagnostic and treatment criteria for oral metformin versus injectable insulin and follow them and their children through delivery to 2 years post partum. More information is available at www.decidestudy.org. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Institutional Review Board at The Ohio State University approved this study (IRB: 2024H0193; date: 7 December 2024). We plan to submit manuscripts describing the results of each study aim, including the pregnancy outcomes, the 2-year follow-up outcomes, and mixed-methods assessment of patient experiences for publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at international scientific meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06445946.

Effect of pioglitazone on inflammatory response and clinical outcome in T2DM patients with COVID-19: a randomized multicenter double-blind clinical trial.

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, has emerged as a rapidly spreading contagious disease across the globe. Recent studies showed that people with diabetes mellitus, severe obesity, and cardiovascular disease are at higher risk of mortality from COVID-19. It has been suggested that the increased risk is due to the chronic inflammatory state associated with type 2 diabetes. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of pioglitazone, a strong insulin sensitizer with anti-inflammatory properties, in improving the clinical outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes admitted with moderate-severe COVID-19. Method: We enrolled 350 patients with type 2 diabetes who were admitted to hospitals in Qatar and Kuwait with COVID-19. Patients were randomized to receive, in a double-blind fashion, pioglitazone (n = 189) or a matching placebo (n = 161) for 28 days. The study had two primary outcomes: (1) the incidence of a composite outcome composed of (a) the requirement for mechanical ventilation, (b) death, and (c) myocardial damage; and (2) an increase in C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. Results: The first primary outcome occurred in 28 participants (8%), and the secondary outcome occurred in 17. Treatment with pioglitazone showed a significant reduction in interleukin (IL)-3 levels compared with placebo treatment (mean (SD) 2.73 (± 2.14) [95% CI: 0.02, 1.1], p = 0.043 vs. 2.28 (± 1.67) [95% CI: - 0.23, 0.86], p = 0.3, respectively), with no effect seen in the levels of other inflammatory markers. Even though not significant, a few of the patients on pioglitazone exhibited serum troponin levels > 3 times higher than the normal range seen in patients on placebo. On the other hand, more patients on pioglitazone were admitted to the ICU than those with placebo, and no significant difference in the CRP reduction was observed between the two groups. Conclusion: The results of the present study demonstrate that pioglitazone treatment did not independently provide any additional clinical benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes admitted with a COVID-19 infection. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT04604223.

Automated Insulin Delivery for Young People with Type 1 Diabetes and Elevated A1c.

BACKGROUND: Automated insulin delivery is the treatment of choice in adults with type 1 diabetes. Data are needed on the efficacy and safety of automated insulin delivery for children and youth with diabetes and elevated glycated hemoglobin levels. METHODS: In this multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial, we assigned patients with type 1 diabetes in a 1:1 ratio either to use an automated insulin delivery system (MiniMed 780G) or to receive usual diabetes care of multiple daily injections or non--automated pump therapy (control). The patients were children and youth (defined as 7 to 25 years of age) with elevated glycemia (glycated hemoglobin ≥8.5% with no upper limit). The primary outcome was the baseline-adjusted between-group difference in glycated hemoglobin at 13 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 80 patients underwent randomization (37 to automated insulin delivery and 43 to control) and all patients completed the trial. At 13 weeks, the mean (±SD) glycated hemoglobin decreased from 10.5±1.9% to 8.1±1.8% in the automated insulin delivery group but remained relatively consistent in the control group, changing from 10.4±1.6% to 10.6±1.8% (baseline-adjusted between-group difference, -2.5 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.1 to -1.8; P<0.001). Patients in the automated insulin delivery group spent on average 8.4 hours more in the target glucose range of 70 to 180 mg/dl than those in the control group. One severe hypoglycemia event and two diabetic ketoacidosis events occurred in the control group, with no such events in the automated insulin delivery group. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial of 80 children and youth with elevated glycated hemoglobin, automated insulin delivery significantly reduced glycated hemoglobin compared with usual diabetes care, without resulting in severe hypoglycemia or diabetic ketoacidosis events. (Funded by Lions Clubs New Zealand District 202F and others; Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12622001454763.).

Liraglutide innovations: a comprehensive review of patents (2014-2024).

Type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a complicated long-term disorder associated with metabolism that is identified by insulin resistance, imbalance in glucose regulation and reduced secretion of insulin. GLP-1(Glucagon-like peptide-1) is an incretin mimetic that has excellent effects on the regulation of blood glucose levels and also the management of disorders associated with vital organs. GLP-1 agonist is an effective class of drug for the treatment of type-2 diabetes mellitus and associated complications. Liraglutide is one of the potent drugs of this class having similar effects as biological GLP-1. This review includes clinical trials and patents related to the pharmaceutical formulation, synthesis and biological action of liraglutide.

Insights to the emerging potential of glucokinase activators as antidiabetic agent.

The glucokinase enzyme (belongs to the hexokinase family) is present in liver cells and ß-cells of the pancreas. Glucokinase acts as a catalyst in the conversion of glucose-6-phosphate from glucose which is rate-limiting step in glucose metabolism. Glucokinase becomes malfunctional or remains inactivated in diabetes. Glucokinase activators are compounds that bind at the allosteric site of the glucokinase enzyme and activate it. This article highlights the patent and recent research papers history with possible SAR from year 2014-2023. The data comprises the discussion of novel chemotypes (GKAs) that are being targeted for drug development and entered into clinical trials. GK activators have attracted massive interest since successful results have been reported from clinical trials data.

[Box: see text].

Cardiovascular Effectiveness and Safety of Antidiabetic Drugs in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Peripheral Artery Disease: Systematic Review.

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is an atherosclerotic condition commonly complicating type 2 diabetes (T2D), leading to poor quality of life and increased risk of major adverse lower-limb (MALE) and cardiovascular (CV) events (MACE). Therapeutic management of PAD in T2D patients is much more arduous, often due to bilateral, multi-vessel, and distal vascular involvement, in addition to increased systemic polyvascular atherosclerotic burden. On the other hand, the pathophysiological link between PAD and T2D is very complex, involving mechanisms such as endothelial dysfunction and increased subclinical inflammation in addition to chronic hyperglycemia. Therefore, the clinical approach should not ignore vascular protection with the aim of reducing limb and overall CV events besides a mere glucose-lowering effect. However, the choice of the best medications in this setting is challenging due to low-grade evidence or lacking targeted studies in PAD patients. The present review highlighted the strong relationship between T2D and PAD, focusing on the best treatment strategy to reduce CV risk and prevent PAD occurrence and worsening in patients with T2D. The Medline databases were searched for studies including T2D and PAD up to June 2024 and reporting the CV effectiveness and safety of the most used glucose-lowering agents, with no restriction on PAD definition, study design, or country. The main outcomes considered were MACE-including nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and CV death-and MALE-defined as lower-limb complications, amputations, or need for revascularization. To the best of our current knowledge, GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors represent the best choice to reduce CV risk in T2D and PAD settings, but a personalized approach should be considered. GLP-1 receptor agonists should be preferred in subjects with prevalent atherosclerotic burden and a history of previous MALE, while SGLT2 inhibitors should be used in those with heart failure if overall CV benefits outweigh the risk of lower-limb complications.

Semaglutide and Opioid Overdose Risk in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Opioid Use Disorder.

This cohort study uses emulation target trial methods to evaluate whether semaglutide is associated with lower rates of opioid overdose among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and opioid use disorder (OUD).

Mitigation of Diabetes Mellitus Using Euphorbia helioscopia Leaf Ethanolic Extract by Modulating GCK, GLUT4, IGF, and G6P Expressions in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rats.

Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder. Synthetic antidiabetics are the commonly used treatment options associated with complications. The objective of this study was to explore the antioxidative and antidiabetic potential of Euphorbia helioscopia whole plant ethanolic extract using in vitro and in vivo models. For that purpose, the antioxidative potential was explored by using 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl analysis. In vitro antidiabetic potential of the extract was evaluated using amylase inhibitory analysis. In vivo antidiabetic activity of the extract was assessed in diabetic rats using streptozotocin/nicotinamide (60 mg/kg/120 mg/kg) as an inducing agent. Metformin was used as standard. The results indicated the presence of significant quantities of phenolic 82.18 ± 1.28 mgg-1 gallic acid equivalent (GAE) and flavonoid 66.55±1.22 mgg-1 quercetin equivalent (QE) contents in the extract. Quantitation of phytoconstituents exhibited the presence of sinapic acid, myricetin, and quercetin using HPLC analysis. The extract inhibited α-amylase by 84.71%, and an antiglycemic potential of 50.34% was assessed in the OGTT assay. Biochemical analysis demonstrated a reduction in urea, creatinine, cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, and alkaline phosphatase (p < 0.001) as compared to diabetic control rats at the dose of 500 mg/kg. An upregulation in the expressions of glucokinase, glucose transporter 4, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ, and insulin-like growth factor was observed in treated rats in contrast to G6P expression, which was downregulated upon treatment. In conclusion, this study provided evidence of the antioxidative and antidiabetic potential of E. helioscopia whole plant ethanolic extract through in vitro and in vivo analysis and emphasized its promising role as a natural alternative.

Impact of baseline FIB-4 score on efpeglenatide benefits on cardiovascular outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes: a participant-level exploratory analysis of the AMPLITUDE-O trial.

AIMS: To estimate the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), expanded MACE, and MACE or Death across Fibrosis- 4 score (FIB-4) categories in people with type 2 diabetes and to determine whether efpeglenatide's effect varies with increasing FIB-4 severity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: AMPLITUDE-O trial data were used to estimate the relationship of FIB-4 score categories to the hazard of MACE, expanded MACE, and MACE or death. Interactions on these outcomes between baseline FIB-4 score, and between FIB-4 score and efpeglenatide were also assessed. RESULTS: Baseline FIB-4 score was available for 4059 participants (99.6%) allowing subdivision of the population in tertiles. During a median follow-up of 1.8 years, numerical increases in the incidence of all 3 outcomes did not change significantly across tertiles of FIB-4 score (P for trend ≥ 0.25) with negligible relationship of the score to incident outcomes (MACE HR, per 1 SD higher score, 95% CI: 1.00, 0.89-1.13). Efpeglenatide's effect on all MACE outcomes did not vary across FIB-4 tertiles (all interaction p values ≥ 0.64). CONCLUSIONS: In high-risk people with type 2 diabetes, the degree of liver fibrosis, as estimated by FIB-4 score, was not related to incident cardiovascular outcomes. The beneficial effect of efpeglenatide on these outcomes is independent of FIB-4 category.

Evidence of a bi-directional relationship between heart failure and diabetes: a strategy for the detection of glucose abnormalities and diabetes prevention in patients with heart failure.

Prevalence of heart failure (HF) and diabetes are markedly increasing globally. In a population of HF patients, approximately 40% have diabetes which is associated with a more severe HF, poorer cardiovascular outcomes and higher hospitalization rates for HF than HF patients without diabetes. Similar trends were shown in HF patients with prediabetes. In addition, the association between HF and renal function decline was demonstrated in patients with or without diabetes. However, the exact prevalence of dysglycemia in HF patients requires further investigation aiming to clarify the most accurate test to detect dysglycemia in this population. The relationship between HF and diabetes is complex and probably bidirectional. In one way, patients with diabetes have a more than two-fold risk of developing incident HF with reduced or preserved ejection fraction than those without diabetes. In the other way, patients with HF, when compared with those without HF, show an increased risk for the onset of diabetes due to several mechanisms including insulin resistance (IR), which makes HF emerging as a precursor for diabetes development. This article provides epidemiological evidence of undetected dysglycemia (prediabetes or diabetes) in HF patients and reviews the pathophysiological mechanisms which favor the development of IR and the risks associated with these disorders in HF patients. This review also offers a discussion of various strategies for the prevention of diabetes in HF patients, based first on fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c measurement and if normal on an oral glucose tolerance test as diagnostic tools for prediabetes and unknown diabetes that should be performed more extensively in those patients. It discusses the implementation of diabetes prevention measures and well-structured management programs for HF patients who are generally overweight or obese, as well as current pharmacotherapeutic options for prediabetes, including sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors which are among the pillars of HF treatment and which recently showed a benefit in the reduction of incident diabetes in HF patients. Thus, there is an urgent need of routine screening for dysglycemia in all HF patients, which should contribute to reduce the incidence of diabetes and to treat earlier diabetes when already present.

Association of semaglutide treatment with coronary artery inflammation in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a retrospective study based on pericoronary adipose tissue attenuation.

BACKGROUND: The pericoronary fat attenuation index (FAI) has emerged as a novel and sensitive biomarker reflecting the degree of coronary artery inflammation. Semaglutide has been demonstrated to exert a cardiovascular protective effect independent of hypoglycemia; however, its impact on coronary artery inflammation remains elusive. This study aimed to investigate the association between semaglutide treatment and coronary artery inflammation based on FAI in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: This study enrolled 497 T2DM patients who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) at Hebei General Hospital, of whom 93 treated with semaglutide (Sema+) and 404 did not (Sema-). Clinical data, laboratory indicators, and CCTA parameters were collected and compared between the two groups at baseline. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for confounders, and pericoronary FAI was compared. Multivariate linear regression models were used to analyze the association between semaglutide treatment and pericoronary FAI. RESULTS: Before PSM, pericoronary FAI of the LAD and LCX was lower in patients treated with semaglutide than those without semaglutide treatment. The results of the PSM analysis revealed a lower FAI in all three major coronary arteries in the Sema + group compared to the Sema- group. Multivariate linear regression analyses revealed an independent association between semaglutide treatment and reduced FAI in all three major coronary arteries. This association varied across T2DM patients of differing profiles. CONCLUSION: Semaglutide treatment may be associated with lower coronary artery inflammation in patients with T2DM, which might partially explain its cardiovascular protective mechanism.

Predicting Antidiabetic Peptide Activity: A Machine Learning Perspective on Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes.

Diabetes mellitus (DM) presents a critical global health challenge, characterized by persistent hyperglycemia and associated with substantial economic and health-related burdens. This study employs advanced machine-learning techniques to improve the prediction and classification of antidiabetic peptides, with a particular focus on differentiating those effective against T1DM from those targeting T2DM. We integrate feature selection with analysis methods, including logistic regression, support vector machines (SVM), and adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), to classify antidiabetic peptides based on key features. Feature selection through the Lasso-penalized method identifies critical peptide characteristics that significantly influence antidiabetic activity, thereby establishing a robust foundation for future peptide design. A comprehensive evaluation of logistic regression, SVM, and AdaBoost shows that AdaBoost consistently outperforms the other methods, making it the most effective approach for classifying antidiabetic peptides. This research underscores the potential of machine learning in the systematic evaluation of bioactive peptides, contributing to the advancement of peptide-based therapies for diabetes management.

Advances in the Insulin-Heart Axis: Current Therapies and Future Directions.

The insulin-heart axis plays a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in insulin-resistant states, including type 2 diabetes mellitus. Insulin resistance disrupts glucose and lipid metabolism, leading to systemic inflammation, oxidative stress, and atherogenesis, which contribute to heart failure (HF) and other CVDs. This review was conducted by systematically searching PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for peer-reviewed studies published in the past decade, focusing on therapeutic interventions targeting the insulin-heart axis. Studies were selected based on their relevance to insulin resistance, cardiovascular outcomes, and the efficacy of pharmacologic treatments. Key findings from the review highlight the efficacy of lifestyle modifications, such as dietary changes and physical activity, which remain the cornerstone of managing insulin resistance and improving cardiovascular outcomes. Moreover, pharmacologic interventions, such as metformin, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, have shown efficacy in reducing cardiovascular risk by addressing metabolic dysfunction, reducing inflammation, and improving endothelial function. Furthermore, emerging treatments, such as angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, and mechanical interventions like ventricular assist devices offer new avenues for managing HF in insulin-resistant patients. The potential of these therapies to improve left ventricular ejection fraction and reverse pathological cardiac remodeling highlights the importance of early intervention. However, challenges remain in optimizing treatment regimens and understanding the long-term cardiovascular effects of these agents. Future research should focus on personalized approaches that integrate lifestyle and pharmacologic therapies to effectively target the insulin-heart axis and mitigate the burden of cardiovascular complications in insulin-resistant populations.

Review on the Role of Polyphenols in Preventing and Treating Type 2 Diabetes: Evidence from In Vitro and In Vivo Studies.

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is one of the leading causes of death globally. There was a 70% increase in diabetes-related deaths between 2000 and 2020, particularly among males. This non-communicable disease is characterized by increased insulin resistance, leading to elevated blood sugar levels and, if untreated, resulting in complications such as nerve damage, kidney disease, blindness, and poor wound healing. T2D management includes dietary intervention, physical exercise, and the administration of blood sugar-lowering medication. However, these medications often have side effects related to intestinal discomfort. Therefore, natural alternatives to standard diabetes medications are being sought to improve the quality of life for individuals with this condition. Polyphenols, which are naturally occurring plant metabolites, have emerged as strong candidates for T2D control. Various phenolic acids (e.g., chlorogenic acid), flavonoids (e.g., quercetin), proanthocyanidins (e.g., procyanidin B2), gallotannins (e.g., monogalloyl hexoside), and ellagitannins (e.g., ellagic acid hexoside) can enhance insulin sensitivity in tissues, reduce chronic inflammation, scavenge free radicals, improve insulin secretion, inhibit enzymes involved in carbohydrate digestion, regulate glucose transport across cell membranes, and modulate gut microbiota. This contribution compiles up-to-date evidence from in vitro and in vivo studies on the role of polyphenols in the prevention and management of T2D, emphasizing the mechanisms of action underlying these effects.

Huperzine A targets Apolipoprotein E: A potential therapeutic drug for diabetic nephropathy based on omics analysis.

AIMS: Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is a major complication of diabetes mellitus (DM) without curative interventions currently. Huperzine A (Hup A), a natural alkaloid, has demonstrated significant hypoglycemic and anti-inflammatory effects. We aim to investigate the protective effects of Hup A on DN and explore the underlying mechanisms METHODS: We applied STZ induced diabetic rats as DN model and leveraged combination analysis of the transcriptome, metabolome, microbiome, and network pharmacology (NP). The total effect of Hup A on DN was detected (i.e. urine protein, renal tissue structure) and the differential genes were further verified at the level of diabetic patients, db/db mice and cells. Clinical data and small interfering RNA (siRNA)-Apoe were adopted. RESULTS: Hup A alleviated kidney injury in DN rats. Transcriptomics data and Western blot indicated that the improvement in DN was primarily associated with Apoe and Apoc2. Additionally, metabolomics data demonstrated that DN-induced lipid metabolism disruption was regulated by Hup A, potentially involving sphingosine. Hup A also enriched microbial diversity and ameliorated DN-induced microbiota imbalance. Spearman's correlation analysis demonstrated significant associations among the transcriptome, metabolome, and microbiome. Apoe level was positively correlated with clinical biomarkers in DN patients. Si-Apoe also played protective role in podocytes. NP analysis also suggested that Hup A may treat DN by modulating lipid metabolism, microbial homeostasis, and apoptosis, further validating our findings. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, we provide the first evidence of the therapeutic effect of Hup A on DN, indicating that Hup A is a potential drug for the prevention and treatment of DN.

Association between diabetic status and risk of acute pancreatitis: A nationwide population-based study.

OBJECTIVE: There have been several epidemiologic studies on the association between diabetes mellitus and acute pancreatitis. However, there is no solid evidence, and the effect of diabetes mellitus severity on acute pancreatitis incidence is not well known. This study aimed to evaluate the association between diabetic status and the risk of acute pancreatitis in a nationwide population-based cohort. METHODS: Among the participants who underwent national health examinations between 2009 and 2012, patients with diabetes mellitus were included. Patients diagnosed with acute pancreatitis before the health examination or diagnosed with pancreatitis within 1 year following the examination were excluded. The association between the number of oral hypoglycemic agents (<3 or ≥3) or insulin use during examination and acute pancreatitis occurrence was analyzed after follow-up until December 31, 2018. RESULTS: Overall, 2,444,254 patients were included in the final analysis. During the follow-up period, acute pancreatitis occurred in 10,360 patients with an incidence ratio of 0.585 per 1,000 person-years, and it was observed that the risk of acute pancreatitis sequentially increased between patients taking oral hypoglycemic agents <3 (incidence ratio = 0.546), those taking ≥3 (incidence ratio = 0.665), and those using insulin (incidence ratio = 0.872). The adjusted hazard ratios of patients taking three or more hypoglycemic agents and those using insulin were 1.196 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.123-1.273) and 1.493 (95% CI 1.398-1.594), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: As diabetes mellitus severity increases, the risk of acute pancreatitis increases.