ABSTRACT
A large Argentine tegu (Salvator merianae) presented with anorexia. Initial radiographs revealed a metallic foreign body in the stomach. The tegu vomited and became inactive two days later. A follow-up radiograph revealed the persistence of the foreign body in the same region. The foreign body was identified as a cluster of multiple magnets resembling neodymium magnets reported missing by the owner. An emergent laparotomy was performed due to gastrointestinal perforations caused by the multiple magnets. The surgical intervention revealed perforations in the walls of the stomach and small intestine and progressing acute peritonitis. Three magnets were extracted from the abdominal cavity and the tegu showed recovery. At 200 days postoperatively, the tegu continued to demonstrate good appetite and energy levels.
Subject(s)
Foreign Bodies , Neodymium , Animals , Foreign Bodies/surgery , Foreign Bodies/veterinary , Magnets , Stomach/surgery , Stomach/injuries , Male , Intestinal Perforation/veterinary , Intestinal Perforation/surgery , Intestinal Perforation/etiologyABSTRACT
Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a potentially life-threatening surgical emergency. It is a rapidly progressive infection of soft tissues, and mortality is related to the degree of sepsis and the general condition of the patient. It is a rare condition that requires a rapid diagnosis and surgical treatment is aggressive debridement. There are a small number of reported cases of perforation of a rectal malignancy leading to NF of the thigh. We present a case with rectal cancer in which the sciatic foramen had provided a channel for the spread of pelvic infection into the thigh.
La fascitis necrotizante es una emergencia quirúrgica potencialmente mortal. Es una infección de tejidos blandos rápidamente progresiva y la mortalidad está relacionada con el grado de sepsis y el estado general del paciente. Es una condición poco común que requiere un diagnóstico rápido, y el tratamiento quirúrgico consiste en un desbridamiento agresivo. Existe un pequeño número de casos notificados de perforación de neoplasia maligna de recto que conduce a fascitis necrotizante del muslo. Presentamos un caso de cáncer de recto en el cual el foramen ciático fue el canal para la propagación de la infección pélvica al muslo.
Subject(s)
Fasciitis, Necrotizing , Intestinal Perforation , Rectal Neoplasms , Thigh , Humans , Fasciitis, Necrotizing/etiology , Fasciitis, Necrotizing/surgery , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Rectal Neoplasms/complications , Intestinal Perforation/etiology , Intestinal Perforation/surgery , Male , Debridement , Adenocarcinoma/complications , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Middle Aged , Sciatic Nerve/injuries , Pelvic Infection/etiologyABSTRACT
Enteral nutrition through jejunostomy is a common practice in any general surgery service; it carries a low risk of complications and morbidity and mortality. We present the case of a patient with an immediate history of subtotal gastrectomy that began nutrition through jejunostomy and complicated with intestinal necrosis due to non-occlusive ischemia in the short period. The purpose of this work is to report on this complication, its pathophysiology and risk factors to take it into account and be able to take appropriate therapeutic action early.
La nutrición enteral por yeyunostomía es una práctica frecuente en cualquier servicio de cirugía general, esta conlleva bajo riesgo de complicaciones y morbimortalidad. Presentamos el caso de una paciente con antecedente inmediato de gastrectomía subtotal que inició nutrición por yeyunostomía y complicó con necrosis intestinal por isquemia no oclusiva en el corto lapso. La finalidad de este trabajo es informar sobre esta complicación, su fisiopatología y factores de riesgo para tenerla en cuenta y poder tomar precozmente una conducta terapéutica adecuada.
Subject(s)
Enteral Nutrition , Intestinal Perforation , Jejunostomy , Necrosis , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Enteral Nutrition/adverse effects , Gastrectomy/adverse effects , Intestinal Perforation/etiology , Intestinal Perforation/surgery , Jejunostomy/adverse effects , Necrosis/etiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Isolated perforations of hollow viscus (HV) represent less than 1% of injuries in blunt abdominal trauma (BAT). When they do present, they are generally due to high-impact mechanisms in the segments of the intestine that are fixed. The aim of this study is to determine the incidence of major HV injuries in BAT at the "Dr. Domingo Luciani" General Hospital (HDL), and address the literature gap regarding updated HV perforations following BAT, especially in low-income settings. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on the medical records of patients admitted to our trauma center with a diagnosis of complicated BAT with HV perforation over 14 years. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Seven hundred sixty-one patients were admitted under the diagnosis of BAT. Of them, 36.79% underwent emergency surgical resolution, and 6.04% had HV perforation as an operative finding. Almost half (44.44%) of these cases presented as a single isolated injury, while the remaining were associated with other intra-abdominal organ injuries. The most common lesions were Grade II-III jejunum and Grade I transverse colon, affecting an equal proportion of patients at 13.33%. In recent years, an increased incidence of HV injuries secondary to BAT has been observed. Despite this, in many cases, the diagnosis is delayed, so even in the presence of negative diagnostic studies, the surgical approach based on the trauma mechanism, hemodynamic status, and systematic reevaluation of the polytraumatized patient should prevail.
Subject(s)
Abdominal Injuries , Intestinal Perforation , Wounds, Nonpenetrating , Humans , Trauma Centers , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/epidemiology , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/surgery , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/complications , Abdominal Injuries/epidemiology , Abdominal Injuries/surgery , Abdominal Injuries/complications , Jejunum , Intestinal Perforation/surgery , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
To determine if preoperative-intraoperative factors such as age, comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, body mass index (BMI), and severity of peritonitis affect the rate of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing a primary anastomosis (PA) or Hartmann Procedure (HP) for perforated diverticulitis. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis, conducted according to PRISMA, with an electronic search of the PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases. The search retrieved 614 studies, of which 11 were included. Preoperative-Intraoperative factors including age, ASA classification, BMI, severity of peritonitis, and comorbidities were collected. Primary endpoints were mortality and postoperative complications including sepsis, surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, hemorrhage, postoperative ileus, stoma complications, anastomotic leak, and stump leakage. 133,304 patients were included, of whom 126,504 (94.9%) underwent a HP and 6800 (5.1%) underwent a PA. There was no difference between the groups with regards to comorbidities (p = 0.32), BMI (p = 0.28), or severity of peritonitis (p = 0.09). There was no difference in mortality [RR 0.76 (0.44-1.33); p = 0.33]; [RR 0.66 (0.33-1.35); p = 0.25]. More non-surgical postoperative complications occurred in the HP group (p = 0.02). There was a significant association in the HP group between the severity of peritonitis and mortality (p = 0.01), and surgical site infection (p = 0.01). In patients with perforated diverticulitis, PA can be chosen. Age, comorbidities, and BMI do not influence postoperative outcomes. The severity of peritonitis should be taken into account as a predictor of postoperative morbidity and mortality.
Subject(s)
Intestinal Perforation , Peritonitis , Postoperative Complications , Humans , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Intestinal Perforation/mortality , Intestinal Perforation/surgery , Peritonitis/mortality , Peritonitis/surgery , Peritonitis/etiology , Body Mass Index , Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects , Anastomosis, Surgical/methods , Preoperative Period , Diverticulitis/surgery , Diverticulitis/complications , Diverticulitis/mortality , Severity of Illness Index , Age Factors , Comorbidity , Intraoperative Period , MorbidityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an endoscopic study in which the duodenum is observed laterally, and the bile duct is instrumented. There are several indications and complications in the procedure. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of duodenal perforations, using the Stapfer classification in the Hospital Juárez de Mexico over a period of 5 years, as well as the management implemented in such cases. METHOD: The study was carried out at the Hospital Juárez de Mexico of the Ministry of Health. All patients who underwent ERCP between January 1, 2017, to May 30, 2022 were included. RESULTS: 485 ERCP were performed in the study period. Incidence of 1.6% post-ERCP duodenal perforation. The average age of the subjects 56.37 years. In-hospital stay of post-ERCP perforations averaged 9.37 days. The time of the endoscopic study at the time of the surgical procedure is 10 h on average. CONCLUSIONS: Post-ERCP duodenal perforation is a complication that occurs with a low incidence, it tends to increase the number of days of in-hospital stay and increases morbimortality of patients; therefore, it is important to be always alert.
ANTECEDENTES: La colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica (CPRE) es un estudio endoscópico en el cual se observa lateralmente el duodeno y se instrumenta la vía biliar. Existen diversas indicaciones y complicaciones en el procedimiento. OBJETIVO: Determinar la incidencia de perforaciones duodenales utilizando la clasificación Stapfer para ubicación anatómica en el Hospital Juárez de México en un periodo de 5 años, así como el manejo implementado en dichos casos. MÉTODO: El estudio se realizó en el Hospital Juárez de México de la Secretaría de Salud. Se incluyeron todos los pacientes sometidos a CPRE entre el 1 de enero de 2017 y el 30 de mayo de 2022. RESULTADOS: Se realizaron 485 CPRE en el periodo de estudio. Hubo una incidencia del 1.6% de perforación duodenal post-CPRE. El promedio de edad de los sujetos fue de 56.37 años. La estancia hospitalaria de los pacientes con perforación post-CPRE fue en promedio de 9.37 días. El tiempo del estudio endoscópico al momento de realizar el procedimiento quirúrgico fue de 10 h en promedio. CONCLUSIONES: La perforación duodenal post-CPRE es una complicación que ocurre con una baja incidencia, suele aumentar los días de estancia intrahospitalaria y aumenta la morbimortalidad de los pacientes, y por ello es importante estar siempre alerta.
Subject(s)
Duodenal Ulcer , Intestinal Perforation , Peptic Ulcer Perforation , Humans , Middle Aged , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde/adverse effects , Mexico/epidemiology , Intestinal Perforation/epidemiology , Intestinal Perforation/etiology , Intestinal Perforation/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Duodenum/surgery , Duodenal Ulcer/complicationsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate whether infants randomized in the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network Necrotizing Enterocolitis Surgery Trial differed from eligible infants and whether differences affected the generalizability of trial results. STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of infants enrolled in Necrotizing Enterocolitis Surgery Trial (born 2010-2017, with follow-up through 2019) at 20 US academic medical centers and an observational data set of eligible infants through 2013. Infants born ≤1000 g and diagnosed with necrotizing enterocolitis or spontaneous intestinal perforation requiring surgical intervention at ≤8 weeks were eligible. The target population included trial-eligible infants (randomized and nonrandomized) born during the first half of the study with available detailed preoperative data. Using model-based weighting methods, we estimated the effect of initial laparotomy vs peritoneal drain had the target population been randomized. RESULTS: The trial included 308 randomized infants. The target population included 382 (156 randomized and 226 eligible, non-randomized) infants. Compared with the target population, fewer randomized infants had necrotizing enterocolitis (31% vs 47%) or died before discharge (27% vs 41%). However, incidence of the primary composite outcome, death or neurodevelopmental impairment, was similar (69% vs 72%). Effect estimates for initial laparotomy vs drain weighted to the target population were largely unchanged from the original trial after accounting for preoperative diagnosis of necrotizing enterocolitis (adjusted relative risk [95% CI]: 0.85 [0.71-1.03] in target population vs 0.81 [0.64-1.04] in trial) or spontaneous intestinal perforation (1.02 [0.79-1.30] vs 1.11 [0.95-1.31]). CONCLUSION: Despite differences between randomized and eligible infants, estimated treatment effects in the trial and target population were similar, supporting the generalizability of trial results. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01029353.
Subject(s)
Enterocolitis, Necrotizing , Infant, Newborn, Diseases , Infant, Premature, Diseases , Intestinal Perforation , Child , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Humans , Intestinal Perforation/surgery , Enterocolitis, Necrotizing/epidemiology , Enterocolitis, Necrotizing/surgery , Enterocolitis, Necrotizing/complications , Laparotomy/adverse effects , Infant, Premature, Diseases/surgeryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The role of proximal diversion in patients undergoing sigmoid resection and primary anastomosis for diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis is unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of sigmoid resection and primary anastomosis and sigmoid resection and primary anastomosis with a proximal diversion in perforated diverticulitis with diffuse peritonitis. METHOD: A systematic literature search on sigmoid resection and primary anastomosis and sigmoid resection and primary anastomosis with proximal diversion for diverticulitis with diffuse peritonitis was conducted in the Medline and EMBASE databases. Randomized clinical trials and observational studies reporting the primary outcome of interest (30-day mortality) were included. Secondary outcomes were major morbidity, anastomotic leak, reoperation, stoma nonreversal rates, and length of hospital stay. A meta-analysis of proportions and linear regression models were used to assess the effect of each procedure on the different outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 17 studies involving 544 patients (sigmoid resection and primary anastomosis: 287 versus sigmoid resection and primary anastomosis with proximal diversion: 257) were included. Thirty-day mortality (odds ratio 1.12, 95% confidence interval 0.53-2.40, P = .76), major morbidity (odds ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval 0.80-2.44, P = .24), anastomotic leak (odds ratio 0.34, 95% confidence interval 0.099-1.20, P = .10), reoperation (odds ratio 0.49, 95% confidence interval 0.17-1.46, P = .20), and length of stay (sigmoid resection and primary anastomosis: 12.1 vs resection and primary anastomosis with diverting ileostomy: 15 days, P = .44) were similar between groups. The risk of definitive stoma was significantly lower after sigmoid resection and primary anastomosis (odds ratio 0.05, 95% confidence interval 0.006-0.35, P = .003). CONCLUSION: Sigmoid resection and primary anastomosis with or without proximal diversion have similar postoperative outcomes in selected patients with diverticulitis and diffuse peritonitis. However, further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these results.
Subject(s)
Diverticulitis, Colonic , Diverticulitis , Intestinal Perforation , Peritonitis , Humans , Diverticulitis, Colonic/complications , Diverticulitis, Colonic/surgery , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Anastomotic Leak/surgery , Colostomy/adverse effects , Intestinal Perforation/etiology , Intestinal Perforation/surgery , Diverticulitis/surgery , Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects , Peritonitis/surgery , Peritonitis/complications , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Recently, treatment of Hinchey III diverticulitis by laparoscopic peritoneal lavage has been questioned. Moreover, long-term outcomes have been scarcely reported. Primary outcome was to determine the recurrence rate of diverticulitis after a successful laparoscopic peritoneal lavage in Hinchey III diverticulitis. Secondary outcomes were identification of associated risk factors for recurrence and elective sigmoidectomy rate. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study in a tertiary referral center was performed. Patients with Hinchey III diverticulitis who underwent a successful laparoscopic peritoneal lavage between June 2006 and December 2019 were eligible. Diverticulitis recurrence was analyzed according to the Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test, censoring for death, loss of follow-up, or elective sigmoid resection in the absence of recurrence. Risk factors for recurrence were identified using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients had a successful laparoscopic peritoneal lavage (mean age: 63 years; 53.6% women). Four patients had an elective sigmoid resection without recurrences. Recurrence rate was 42% (n = 29) after a median follow-up of 63 months. The cumulative global recurrence at 1, 3, and 5 years was 30% (95% CI, 20-43%), 37.5% (95% CI, 27-51%), and 48.9% (95% CI, 36-64%), respectively. Smoking (HR, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.22-6.5; p = 0.016) and episodes of diverticulitis prior to laparoscopic peritoneal lavage (HR, 5.2; 95% CI, 2.11-12.81; p < 0.001) were independently associated with an increased risk of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Diverticulitis recurrence after a successful laparoscopic peritoneal lavage is high, decreasing after the first year of follow-up. Smoking and previous episodes of acute diverticulitis independently increase the risk of new episodes of diverticulitis.
Subject(s)
Diverticulitis, Colonic , Diverticulitis , Intestinal Perforation , Laparoscopy , Peritonitis , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Male , Diverticulitis, Colonic/complications , Peritoneal Lavage/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Diverticulitis/therapy , Risk Factors , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Peritonitis/etiology , Peritonitis/surgery , Intestinal Perforation/surgery , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
El intestino delgado es el sitio de asiento más frecuente del melanoma metastásico. Su diagnóstico es un desafío por cursar asintomático o con síntomas inespecíficos. Son pocos los casos que presentan complicaciones, siendo infrecuente la peritonitis por perforación. El objetivo del trabajo es comunicar el caso clínico de una peritonitis por perforación de una metástasis de melanoma en intestino delgado. Caso clínico: Paciente de sexo masculino de 66 años con diagnóstico de melanoma de cuello y secundario óseo, encefálico y pulmonar, fue intervenido de urgencia por peritonitis aguda por perforación de metástasis en intestino delgado. El estudio histológico confirmó secundarismo de melanoma cutáneo. Conclusión: Sabiendo que el yeyuno íleon es el sitio de asiento más frecuente de las metástasis de melanoma, ante la presencia de síntomas digestivos inespecíficos o anemia se debe sospechar su compromiso y evaluar posibles alternativas terapéuticas.
The small intestine is the most frequent site of metastatic melanoma. However, its diagnosis continues to be a challenge since it is usually asymptomatic or with non-specific symptoms. Few cases result in complications, peritonitis due to perforation being infrequent. The objective of the work is to report a clinical case of peritonitis due to perforation of a melanoma metastasis in the small intestine. Clinical case: A 66-year-old male patient diagnosed with melanoma of the neck and secondary bone, brain and lung melanoma, underwent emergency surgery for acute peritonitis due to perforation of metastasis in the small intestine, which was resected and anastomosed. The histology confirmed the secondary nature of the cutaneous melanoma. Conclusion: Knowing that the jejunum-ileum is the most frequent site of melanoma metastases, in the presence of non-specific digestive symptoms or anemia, its involvement should be suspected and possible therapeutic alternatives should be evaluated.
O intestino delgado é o local mais frequente de melanoma metastático. O diagnóstico é um desafio por ser assintomático ou apresentar sintomas inespecíficos. Há poucos casos que apresentam complicações, sendo pouco frequente a peritonite por perfuração. O objetivo deste trabalho é relatar um caso clínico de peritonite por perfuração de metástase de melanoma no intestino delgado. Caso clínico: Paciente do sexo masculino, 66 anos, diagnosticado com melanoma no pescoço com metástase óssea, cefálica e pulmonar. Foi submetido a cirurgia de emergência por peritonite aguda por perfuração de metástases do intestino delgado. O estudo histológico confirmou melanoma cutâneo. Conclusão: Sabendo que o jejuno e o íleo é o local mais frequente de metástase de melanoma, na presença de sintomas digestivos inespecíficos ou anemia deve-se suspeitar de seu acometimento e avaliar possíveis alternativas terapêuticas.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Aged , Peritonitis/surgery , Peritonitis/diagnosis , Intestinal Perforation/surgery , Peritonitis/etiology , Skin Neoplasms/complications , Anastomosis, Surgical , Abdominal Pain , Acute Disease , Intestinal Neoplasms/secondary , Melanoma/complicationsABSTRACT
Calcifying fibrous tumor (CFT) is a rare, benign, mesenchymal tumor. It has a slight female predominance, and it can appear in any range of age. It can be in the extremities, neck, and gastrointestinal tract, but it has also been described in other locations. Even though it is a benign lesion, recurrence has been described in some cases in the literature. A free-margin surgical resection is the recommended treatment. We present a 56 -year-old woman who underwent surgery for an intestinal obstruction associated with middle jejunum perforation. Histopathological study described the presence of a calcifying fibrous tumor. Spindle cells were positive for CD34, Factor XIIIa and vimentin. To our knowledge, this is the first case of intestinal perforation secondary to a calcifying fibrous tumor described in the literature.
Subject(s)
Intestinal Perforation , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Intestinal Perforation/etiology , Intestinal Perforation/surgery , Intestinal Perforation/pathology , Calcinosis/pathology , Calcinosis/etiology , Calcinosis/diagnostic imaging , Neoplasms, Fibrous Tissue/pathology , Neoplasms, Fibrous Tissue/complications , Neoplasms, Fibrous Tissue/surgery , Jejunal Neoplasms/complications , Jejunal Neoplasms/pathology , Jejunal Neoplasms/surgery , Jejunal Neoplasms/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
Meckel's diverticulum is the most common congenital defect of the gastrointestinal tract. It is most often silent or asymptomatic. However, acute abdominal signs of obstruction, inflammation, hemorrhage and perforation are possible in other cases. Different foreign bodies can cause perforation of Meckel's diverticulum. We present an 18-year-old male who presented to the emergency department with abdominal pain within 48 previous hours. After evaluation, acute appendicitis was diagnosed and he underwent laparoscopic appendectomy. Meckel's diverticulum perforated by a fish bone was intraoperatively discovered. Incidental appendectomy and segmental resection of the ileum were performed.
Subject(s)
Foreign Bodies , Intestinal Perforation , Meckel Diverticulum , Male , Animals , Meckel Diverticulum/complications , Meckel Diverticulum/diagnosis , Meckel Diverticulum/surgery , Intestinal Perforation/diagnosis , Intestinal Perforation/etiology , Intestinal Perforation/surgery , Foreign Bodies/complications , Foreign Bodies/diagnosis , Abdominal Pain , InflammationABSTRACT
Small bowel injury in a sports setting is a rare occurrence with a paucity of reported cases. A 30-year old male patient consulted for generalized abdominal pain subsequent to secondary blunt abdominal trauma during kick-boxing practice. A computed tomography scan of the abdomen and pelvis revealed a moderate amount of free fluid in both the parietocolic space and the rectovesical pouch, with perihepatic pneumoperitoneum. Emergency laparoscopy was indicated and a closure of small bowel defect was performed. Diagnosis of small bowel injuries is difficult, resulting in delayed treatment and increased mortality and morbidity.
La lesión intestinal en un entorno deportivo es infrecuente con pocos casos comunicados. Un varón de 30 años consultó por dolor abdominal generalizado posterior a un traumatismo abdominal cerrado secundario a la práctica de kick-boxing. Una tomografía computarizada de abdomen y pelvis reveló líquido libre tanto en el espacio parietocólico como en la bolsa rectovesical, con neumoperitoneo perihepático. Se indicó laparoscopia exploradora con cirugía de rafia intestinal. El diagnóstico de las lesiones del intestino delgado es difícil, lo que provoca un retraso en el tratamiento y un aumento de la mortalidad y la morbilidad.
Subject(s)
Abdominal Injuries , Boxing , Intestinal Perforation , Laparoscopy , Wounds, Nonpenetrating , Abdominal Injuries/complications , Abdominal Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Abdominal Injuries/surgery , Adult , Humans , Intestinal Perforation/diagnostic imaging , Intestinal Perforation/etiology , Intestinal Perforation/surgery , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/methods , Male , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/complications , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnostic imaging , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/surgeryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Complications after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are rare, approximately 0.09% to 1.8% are duodenal perforation. This type of injury requires early diagnosis and proper management since the outcomes can be catastrophic, leading to death in 20% of cases. OBJECTIVE: To show our experience in the management of these injuries in order to establish if there is benefit from minimally invasive management versus conventional management. METHOD: Observational, retrospective and descriptive study comparing patients who required surgical management after post-ERCP duodenal perforation in three centers in Bogotá, Colombia, between January 2013 and December 2018. RESULTS: 13 patients were taken to surgical management after duodenal perforation post ERCP, 7 laparoscopically (53.8%), with an average hospital stay of 10.7 days and mortality of 0% and 6 by open route (46.1%), with an average hospital stay of 33 days and mortality of 50%, with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Post ERCP duodenal perforation, despite its low incidence, should be suspected due to its high mortality. Laparoscopic surgery is a good tool to address duodenal perforations after ERCP, because it presents a lower rate of complications and mortality.
ANTECEDENTES: Las complicaciones tras la colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica (CPRE) que necesitan manejo quirúrgico son limitadas y aproximadamente el 0.09-1.8% corresponden a perforación duodenal. Este tipo de lesiones requieren un diagnóstico temprano y un manejo adecuado, ya que los desenlaces pueden ser catastróficos, con una mortalidad reportada de hasta el 20%. OBJETIVO: Presentar nuestra experiencia en el manejo quirúrgico de estas lesiones. MÉTODO: Estudio observacional, retrospectivo y descriptivo, de pacientes que requirieron manejo quirúrgico por perforación duodenal tras CPRE en tres centros de Bogotá, Colombia, entre enero de 2013 y diciembre de 2018. RESULTADOS: Fueron llevados a manejo quirúrgico 13 pacientes, 7 (53.8%) por vía laparoscópica, con una estancia hospitalaria promedio de 10.7 días y una mortalidad del 0%, y 6 (46.1%) por vía abierta, con una estancia hospitalaria promedio de 33 días y una mortalidad del 50%, con seguimiento mínimo a 6 meses. CONCLUSIONES: La perforación duodenal tras una CPRE, pese a su baja incidencia, se debe sospechar por su alta morbimortalidad. La decisión del abordaje quirúrgico está condicionada por el estado clínico del paciente, y por ende está ligada al pronóstico de este.
Subject(s)
Duodenal Ulcer , Intestinal Perforation , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde/adverse effects , Humans , Intestinal Perforation/etiology , Intestinal Perforation/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Introducción: La ascariasis es una enteroparasitosis con alta prevalencia en la población pediátrica tercermundista, la cual puede asociarse a otras enfermedades intestinales y tener graves complicaciones que requieren tratamiento quirúrgico. Objetivo: Informar el caso de un infante operado por coinfección de ascariasis intestinal y fiebre tifoidea complicadas. Presentación del caso: Paciente masculino de 9 años de edad asistido y operado en el hospital provincial N´gola Kimbanda de la provincia Namibe, Angola, por presentar evidencia clínica de peritonitis aguda generalizada por perforación intestinal de causa tifoidea y por cuyo orificio salían además áscaris lumbricoides vivos. Su evolución no fue satisfactoria y falleció 24 horas después de la operación. Conclusiones: El diagnóstico y tratamiento quirúrgico oportuno de la coinfección letal de ascariasis y fiebre tifoidea complicadas permitirá disminuir la morbilidad y mortalidad por esta prevalente asociación(AU)
Introduction: Ascariasis is an enteroparasitosis with high prevalence in the third-world pediatric population, which can be associated with other bowel diseases and have serious complications that require surgical treatment. Objective: Report the case of an infant operated by the co-infection of complicated intestinal ascariasis and typhoid fever. Case presentation: 9-year-old male patient attended and operated at N'gola Kimbanda Provincial Hospital in Namibe Province, Angola, after presenting clinical evidence of generalized acute peritonitis due to intestinal perforation of typhoid-causing and through which live ascaris lumbricoide also came out. His evolution was unsatisfactory and he died 24 hours after the operation. Conclusions: The timely diagnosis and surgical treatment of lethal co-infection of complicated ascariasis and typhoid fever will reduce morbidity and mortality from this prevalent association(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Child , Peritonitis/etiology , Ascariasis/epidemiology , Ascaris lumbricoides/parasitology , Intestinal Diseases/complications , Intestinal Perforation/surgery , Coinfection/mortalityABSTRACT
Ingestion of foreign bodies is common in the pediatric population. Most foreign bodies have a benign behavior and are usually eliminated without generating greater morbidity and mortality. In relation to the intake of magnets, its frequency has increased to the point that it currently represents a public health problem in the pediatric population. The ingestion of a single magnet does not generate any risk, but the ingestion of 2 or more of these, or even of magnets and metals in succession is considered an emergency since they can attract each other and can cause serious symptoms of intestinal obstruction, bleeding, fistulas, perforation and even intestinal necrosis. We present 2 pediatric patients, who ingested multiple magnets, in these cases we highlight the variety in the clinical presentation, as well as the complications presented in relation to a late diagnosis.
Subject(s)
Foreign Bodies , Intestinal Obstruction , Intestinal Perforation , Pediatrics , Child , Eating , Foreign Bodies/diagnostic imaging , Foreign Bodies/surgery , Humans , Intestinal Perforation/diagnosis , Intestinal Perforation/etiology , Intestinal Perforation/surgery , MagnetsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of intestinal tuberculosis poses a dilemma to physicians due to nonspecific symptoms like abdominal pain, fever, nausea, and a change in bowel habit. In particular, the distinction between inflammatory bowel disease and intestinal tuberculosis remains challenging. CASE PRESENTATION: A 27-year-old man from Colombia presented with fever, night sweats, and progressive lower abdominal pain. Computed tomography revealed a thickening of the bowel wall with a mesenterial lymphadenopathy, ascites ,and a pleural tumor mass. Histology of intestinal and pleural biopsy specimens showed a granulomatous inflammation. Although microscopy and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) were negative, empirical MTB treatment was initiated on suspicion. Due to a massive post-stenotic atrophied intestinal bowel, MTB medications were administered parenterally in the initial phase of treatment to guarantee adequate systemic resorption. The complicated and critical further course included an intra-abdominal abscess and bowel perforation requiring a split stoma, before the patient could be discharged in good condition after 3 months of in-hospital care. CONCLUSIONS: This case highlights the clinical complexity and diagnostic challenges of intestinal MTB infection. A multidisciplinary team of physicians should be sensitized to a timely diagnosis of this disease, which often mimics inflammation similar to inflammatory bowel disease, other infections, or malignancies. In our case, radiological findings, histological results, and migratory background underpinned the suspected diagnosis and allowed early initiation of tuberculostatic treatment.