Colonoscopic removal of an intrauterine device with rectal perforation: A case report.

RATIONALE: The intrauterine device is one of the effective, safe, convenient, economical, and reversible contraceptive methods. Although its contraceptive effect is definite, some female patients may experience complications such as expulsion, bleeding, and pregnancy with the device in place. Rectal perforation is one of the rare and serious complications, which can lead to complications such as abdominal infection and intestinal adhesions, severely affecting the quality of life of patients. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 34-year-old female was sent to the Department of Gastroenterology with noticeable left lower quadrant abdominal pain. She had presented with abdominal discomfort and anal tenesmus 1 year earlier. Two months ago, her abdominal pain had gradually worsened and she was presented to our hospital. DIAGNOSES: Investigations, including colonoscopy and computed tomography scan, had revealed an intrauterine device migrated and perforated into the rectum. INTERVENTIONS AND OUTCOMES: The patient underwent successful colonoscopic removal of the intrauterine device. She recovered well after the treatment. LESSONS: This case proves that endoscopic therapy can be considered the preferred method for removing intrauterine devices displaced into the digestive tract lumen.

Ease of removal of malpositioned intrauterine devices: A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare removal timing, techniques, and success of malpositioned intrauterine device (IUDs) to nonmalpositioned IUDs. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study of IUD users with ultrasound performed between July 2014 and July 2017 within one medical system. We used Fisher exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests to compare clinical characteristics and IUD removal details between patients with malpositioned and nonmalpositioned IUDs. RESULTS: Of 1759 ultrasounds reporting the presence of an IUD, 436 described IUD malposition. Of these, 150 described the IUD as embedded and 16 as partially perforated. IUDs were more likely to be removed and removed sooner for patients with malpositioned compared with nonmalpositioned IUDs (281/436 vs 545/1323, p < 0.001 and median 17 days vs 236 days from the index ultrasound, p < 0.001). Most IUDs, malpositioned and nonmalpositioned, were removed on the first attempt (82%, 85%), by a generalist obstetrician and gynecologist (75%, 70%), using a ring forceps (73%, 65%). Most embedded and partially perforated IUDs were removed (68%, 69%), using a ring forceps (59%, 67%), on the first attempt (84%, 91%). CONCLUSIONS: Malpositioned IUDs were more likely to be removed and removed sooner than nonmalpositioned IUDs. Most IUDs, even IUDs labeled as partially perforated or embedded, were removed by a generalist obstetrician and gynecologist, using ring forceps, on first attempt. IMPLICATIONS: Ultrasound findings of IUD malposition are not associated with difficult IUD removal.

Asymptomatic uterine perforation and IUD migration to the broad ligament: A case report.

RATIONALE: Uterine perforation is a serious complication of intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) placement. However, as complete uterine perforation and extrauterine migration may remain asymptomatic, thorough localization of the IUD is important prior to reinsertion. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 33-year-old patient who has had 4 IUD insertions, wherein the location of the first IUD (inserted 14 years ago) was not identified prior to reinsertion and replacement of the subsequent three. She presented to hospital with a 6-month history of abdominal pain. Pelvic ultrasonography (US), radiography, hysteroscopy and laparoscopy examinations confirmed that a retained migrated IUD in the right broad ligament. DIAGNOSIS: Uterine perforation, IUD migration to the broad ligament. INTERVENTIONS: The patient underwent hysteroscopy and laparoscopy. OUTCOMES: Both IUDs were successfully removed without any complications.

Bladder Stone Formation due to Intravesical Migration of the Intrauterine Device: A Report of 2 Cases.

INTRODUCTION: Approximately 5% of bladder stones occur in women and are usually associated with foreign bodies or urinary stasis. Spontaneous migration of the intrauterine device (IUD) into the bladder is a rare complication. In this report, we present 2 cases of migrated IUD who had undergone surgery at our clinic due to bladder stones. CASE PRESENTATIONS: We detected migrated IUDs into the bladder in 2 female patients, aged 37 and 56 years, who presented with lower urinary tract symptoms and urinary tract infection. In the first case, endoscopic cystolithotripsy was performed, and the IUD was removed without complications. In the second case, the IUD could not be removed endoscopically since it had fractionally invaded the bladder wall, and the IUD was removed without complications by performing an open cystolithotomy. CONCLUSION: A comprehensive gynecological history should be taken from every female patient presenting with recurrent urinary tract infections and lower urinary tract symptoms. If these patients have a history of IUD placement, the possibility of the intravesical migration of this device should be kept in mind.

Intrauterine device migration into the bladder leading to stones formation.

An intrauterine device (IUD) is a popular method of contraception mainly used in developing countries. Perforation is one of the most serious but a rare complication secondary to the insertion of an IUD, while perforation into the intravesical organs such as the bladder is even more rare. A 30-year-old multipara in early 30s, with two previous caesarean sections (CS) and one curettage, was found to have her IUD puncturing the bladder during a cystoscopy procedure to remove her bladder stones. Transvesical migration of an IUD is an uncommon complication with a high rate of calculi formation, which is thought to be caused by the IUD's lithogenic potential. Imaging approaches such as ultrasound and pelvic X-rays are considered imperative in the accurate diagnosis. Any migrated IUD should be removed regardless of location. Prompt and continual monitoring of women using an IUD is essential and in a case where the IUD has migrated, the removal using the endoscopic approach is a safe and effective method.

[Endoscopic removal of intrauterine device perforating the sigmoid colon: case report]. / Retrait endoscopique d'un dispositif intra-utérin perforant le côlon sigmoïde: à propos d'un cas.

Intrauterine device (IUD) is the mainstay of family planning methods in developing countries. However, it is associated with severe complications such as bleeding, perforation and migration to adjacent organs. Although perforation of the uterus is not rare, migration to the sigmoid colon is exceptional. We here report a case of IUD migration into sigmoid colon; this was removed via low endoscopy. The study involved a 45-year-old woman using an IUD who presented with pelvic pain associated with a feeling of pelvic heaviness 6 years later of insertion. Clinical examination was without abnormalities, and computed tomography (CT) scan showed the IUD embedded in the sigmoid colon wall. Diagnostic and therapeutic laparoscopy was performed, which objectified IUD-related intestinal perforation. IUD was partially embedded in the sigmoid colon wall and couldn't be removed. The device was removed during colonoscopy by diathermy loop excision (15 mm in diameter).

Migración de un dispositivo intrauterino a vejiga con litiasis vesical secundaria y cistitis recurrente como forma clínica de presentación. Reporte de caso / Migration of an intrauterine device to the bladder with secondary bladder lithiasis and recurrent cystitis as a clinical presentation. Case report

RESUMEN Fundamento: El dispositivo intrauterino ha sido utilizado durante muchos años como método anticonceptivo; una complicación infrecuente posterior a su inserción es la migración fuera del útero. La localización vesical y la formación de vesicolitiasis, son complicaciones asociadas a la migración. Objetivo: Presentar un caso de migración de un dispositivo intrauterino a vejiga con litiasis sobreañadida como inusual etiología de una cistitis recurrente. Presentación del caso: Caso clínico de un dispositivo intrauterino en vejiga en una paciente de 43 años, cuyo diagnóstico se realizó incidentalmente en estudio de cistitis recurrente; se diagnosticó imagenológica y endoscópicamente en consulta de Urología; se decidió tratamiento quirúrgico mediante cistolitotomía a cielo abierto y se extrajo un cálculo de 4x5 cm de diámetro. La paciente evolucionó satisfactoriamente. Conclusiones: Considérese la posibilidad de migración del dispositivo intrauterino a la vejiga con litiasis sobreañadida como causa de cistitis recurrente, en pacientes femeninas que tengan antecedente de uso de este método anticonceptivo, lo que constituye un elemento importante en el diagnóstico y tratamiento de la infección urinaria baja.

ABSTRACT Background: The intrauterine device has been used for years as a contraceptive method; a non-frequent complication after its insertion is migration out of the uterus. The bladder location and the formation of vesicolithiasis are complications associated with migration. Objective: To present a migration case from an intrauterine device to the bladder with overadded lithiasis as an unusual etiology of recurrent cystitis. Case report: Clinical case of an intrauterine device in the bladder in a 43-year-old patient, whose diagnosis was made incidentally in a recurrent cystitis study, it was diagnosed by imaging and endoscopy in the Urology consultation; surgical treatment was decided by means of open cystolithotomy and a stone 4x5 cm in diameter was extracted. The patient evolved satisfactorily. Conclusions: To consider the possibility of migration of the intrauterine device to the bladder with overadded lithiasis as a cause of recurrent cystitis in female patients who have a preceding use of this contraceptive method, thus it constitutes an important element in the diagnosis and treatment of urinary lower infection.

Fístula utero-yeyunal secundaria a migración de dispositivo intrauterino: reporte de un caso / Utero-jejunal fistula secondary to intrauterine device migration: a case report

RESUMEN El dispositivo intrauterino (DIU) es un método anticonceptivo muy popular, eficaz y seguro. Aunque posee complicaciones bien descritas como es la migración, la que puede ser a otros órganos dentro de la cavidad peritoneal. La fístula uteroyeyunal es un evento clínico poco frecuente, pero de gran repercusión si no es diagnosticada y tratada. Se presenta el caso de una paciente usuaria de DIU, el que migra a cavidad abdominal, con posterior formación de fístula uteroyeyunal.

ABSTRACT The intrauterine device is a popular, efficient and safe contraceptive. Although it has some well described complications, such as migration, which may be to the different organs inside of the peritoneal cavity. The uterus-jejunal fistula is a rare clinical event, but with great repercussion if it is not well assessed and treated properly. We present the clinical case of a patient with a migrated intrauterine device and a fistula uterus-jejunal formation.

[Intravascular migration of a contraceptive implant]. / Intravasculaire migratie van een hormoonimplantaat.

BACKGROUND: The Implanon NXT is a commonly used contraceptive. Incorrect localization of the implant can cause complications. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 41-year-old woman is seen in the gynaecology outpatient clinic with a request to remove a recently placed Implanon NXT because of worsening mood symptoms. The implant can't be found on physical and ultrasound examination. Duringsurgicalexplorationthe implant is not found at theinsertion site' By means of X-ray scanning the implant becomes visible around the humeral head. The implant appears to be located in the cephalic vein and is subsequently removed. CONCLUSION: In case of a referral due to because of worsening mood symptoms after an Implanon NXT exchange, it is possible that the implant is localized incorrectly. It is recommended to use additional imaging before performing surgical exploration. Furthermore, it is important to insert the Implanon NXT according to the supplied instructions to prevent this complication.

[A woman with abdominal pain after insertion of an intra-uterine device]. / Een vrouw met buikpijn na insertie van een spiraaltje.

A clinical picture of a 35-year-old woman presented at the gynaecology department with a positive pregnancy test even though she had an intra-uterine device (IUD) inserted three months previously. During laparoscopy the Ballerina IUD turns out to be located in the appendix.

Migración intravesical de dispositivo intrauterino / Intravesical migration of intrauterine device

No disponible

Pelvic pain.

When a complete metabolic panel offered no clues, we turned to imaging. And that's when we had our diagnosis.

Dislocated intrauterine devices: clinical presentations, diagnosis and management.

OBJECTIVE: Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are globally one of the most popular methods of contraception. Uterine perforation is one of the most significant complications of IUD use and commonly occurs at the time of IUD insertion rather than presenting as delayed migration. This paper reports a series of 13 cases of displaced IUDs requiring retrieval by laparoscopy or laparotomy. All the IUDs were copper bearing and most perforations occurred immediately after IUD insertion. CASES: In two patients with sigmoid colon injury and IUD penetration of the appendix, laparoscopic management had failed and laparotomy was necessary owing to severe obliteration of the pelvic cavity. In one patient laparotomy was the preferred surgical approach owing to acute bowel perforation. In the remaining patients, the displaced devices were successfully removed by laparoscopy. CONCLUSION: Uterine perforation and IUD migration to the organs in the abdominopelvic cavity are serious complications of IUD insertion and can be successfully managed by laparoscopy, or by laparotomy in the presence of severe pelvic adhesions or unexpected complications.

A 47-Year-Old Woman with Gastric Transmigration of an Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Managed by Laparoscopic Wedge Gastric Resection.

BACKGROUND Intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUCD) are commonly used. Although IUCD use is considered safe, one adverse event is uterine perforation and its migration into surrounding organs. Migrations into the urinary bladder and the intestine have been sometimes reported. We here report a very rare case in which an IUCD migrated into the stomach; gastric endoscopy incidentally revealed the IUCD half embedded and half in the gastric lumen. To our knowledge, this is the second report ever of IUCD migration into the stomach. CASE REPORT A 47-year-old woman with BMI 36.2 visited us as a candidate for an intragastric balloon to reduce her weight. An IUCD was inserted 18 years ago and was not yet removed. Diagnostic gastric endoscopy revealed a foreign body appearing to be an IUCD. Endoscopic removal failed. Computed tomography indicated the presence of an IUCD through the gastric cavity and thus we performed laparoscopic removal of the IUCD with wedge resection of the stomach. A penetrating IUCD was confirmed. CONCLUSIONS A gastric foreign body can be a migrated IUCD. Although rare, we must be aware that IUCDs can migrate into unexpected organs.

Migración de dispositivo intrauterino a vejiga / Intrauterine device migration to bladder

Introducción: La litiasis vesical secundaria se forma en el reservorio vesical y requiere la existencia de condiciones patológicas previas como lo son los cuerpos extraños. Objetivo: Describir dos casos clínicos de litiasis vesical secundaria a migración de un dispositivo intrauterino. Caso clínico: Se presentan dos casos de migración intravesical de dispositivo intrauterino con litiasis vesical secundaria. Se diagnosticaron años después de su inserción, ante la aparición de dolor pélvico, cistitis a repetición y hematuria. La laparoscopia no fue útil para su diagnóstico. En consulta de Urología la ultrasonografía y la radiografía de pelvis fueron herramientas diagnósticas útiles ante la sospecha inicial de esta patología. Presentaron buena evolución y regresión total de los síntomas tras cistolitotomía suprapúbica. Conclusión: Se debe pensar en la posibilidad de migración de un dispositivo intrauterino a vejiga ante la cronicidad de síntomas urinarios irritativos bajos en toda mujer que emplee este método anticonceptivo y desconozca su paradero(AU)

Introduction: Secondary bladder lithiasis is formed in the bladder reservoir and requires the existence of previous pathological conditions such as foreign bodies. Objective: To describe two clinical cases of bladder lithiasis secondary to intrauterine device migration. Clinical case report: Two cases of intravesical migration of an intrauterine device with secondary bladder stones are reported. They were diagnosed years after insertion, due to the appearance of pelvic pain, recurrent cystitis and hematuria. Laparoscopy was not helpful for its diagnosis. In Urology consultation, ultrasound and pelvic radiography were useful diagnostic tools in the event of the initial suspicion of this pathology. They showed good evolution and total regression of symptoms after suprapubic cystolithotomy. Conclusion: The possibility of an intrauterine device migration to the bladder should be considered when chronicity of irritative low urinary symptoms in every woman who uses this contraceptive method and which locations are unknown(AU)