A European consensus recommendation on the management of delayed methotrexate elimination: supportive measures, leucovorin rescue and glucarpidase treatment.

High-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) is used in the treatment of a range of adult and childhood cancers. Although HDMTX can provide effective anti-tumor activity with an acceptable safety profile for most patients, delayed methotrexate elimination (DME) develops in a minority of patients receiving HDMTX and may be accompanied by renal dysfunction and potentially life-threatening toxicity. A panel of European physicians with experience in the use of HDMTX as well as of glucarpidase convened to develop a series of consensus statements to provide practical guidance on the prevention and treatment of DME, including the use of glucarpidase. Robust implementation of supportive measures including hyperhydration and urine alkalinization emerged as critical in order to reduce the risk of DME with HDMTX treatment, with leucovorin rescue critical in reducing the risk of DME complications. Early recognition of DME is important to promptly implement appropriate treatment including, intensified hydration, high-dose leucovorin and, when appropriate, glucarpidase.

Efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in patients with primary liver cancer with portal vein tumor thrombosis: a comparative analysis of different perfusion chemotherapeutic regimens.

BACKGROUND: Portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) commonly occurs in patients with primary liver cancer (PLC). Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a treatment for patients with PLC and PVTT. Some studies have shown that combining TACE therapy with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) might improve the survival rate of PLC patients with PVTT. However, few studies have compared the different regimens of PLC with PVTT. We aimed to compare the differences between the oxaliplatin + raltetrexed regimen and FOLFOX regimen. METHODS: We divided the 248 patients into two groups. There were 60 patients in the oxaliplatin + ratitetrexed group and 74 patients in the FOLFOX group. The primary endpoints were OS and PFS. The secondary endpoints were ORR and adverse events. We used SPSS software, the Kaplan-Meier method, the t test, and the rank sum test to compare the differences between the two groups. RESULTS: The median OS was 10.82 months in the oxaliplatin + raltitrexed group and 8.67 months in the FOLFOX group. The median PFS time was greater in the oxaliplatin + raltitrexed group (10.0 months) than that in the FOLFOX group (7.1 months). The ORR was greater in the oxaliplatin + raltitrexed group than that in the FOLFOX group (18.3% vs. 13.5%; P = 0.445). The DCR in the oxaliplatin + raltitrexed group was higher than that in the FOLFOX group (70.0% vs. 64.8%; P = 0.529). However, in the subgroup analysis, the difference between them was more significant in the type II PVTT subgroup. The OS was 12.08 months in the oxaliplatin + raltitrexed group and 7.26 months in the FOLFOX group (P = 0.008). The PFS was 11.68 months in the oxaliplatin + raltitrexed group and 6.26 months in the FOLFOX group (P = 0.014). In the right branch of type II PVTT, the OS was 13.54 months in the oxaliplatin + raltitrexed group and 6.89 months in the FOLFOX group (P = 0.015), and the PFS was 13.35 months in the oxaliplatin + raltitrexed group and 6.27 months in the FOLFOX group (P = 0.030). The incidence of adverse reactions was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the FOLFOX regimen, the oxaliplatin + raltitrexed chemoembolization regimen had longer OS, PFS time and ORR and DCR and it was safe and tolerable.

Irinotecan hydrochloride liposome HR070803 in combination with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma following prior gemcitabine-based therapy (PAN-HEROIC-1): a phase 3 trial.

Liposomal irinotecan has shown promising antitumor activity in patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who have undergone prior gemcitabine-based therapies. This randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled, multicenter phase 3 study (NCT05074589) assessed the efficacy and safety of liposomal irinotecan HR070803 combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) in this patient population. Patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic PDAC who had previously received gemcitabine-based therapies were randomized 1:1 to receive either HR070803 (60 mg/m2 anhydrous irinotecan hydrochloride, equal to 56.5 mg/m2 free base) or placebo, both in combination with 5-FU (2000 mg/m2) and LV (200 mg/m2), all given intravenously every two weeks. The primary endpoint of the study was overall survival (OS). A total of 298 patients were enrolled and received HR070803 plus 5-FU/LV (HR070803 group, n = 149) or placebo plus 5-FU/LV (placebo group, n = 149). Median OS was significantly improved in the HR070803 group compared to the placebo group (7.4 months [95% CI 6.1-8.4] versus 5.0 months [95% CI 4.3-6.0]; HR 0.63 [95% CI 0.48-0.84]; two-sided p = 0.0019). The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events in the HR070803 group were increased gamma-glutamyltransferase (19.0% versus 11.6% in placebo group) and decreased neutrophil count (12.9% versus 0 in placebo group). No treatment-related deaths occurred in the HR070803 group, while the placebo group reported one treatment-related death (abdominal infection). HR070803 in combination with 5-FU/LV has shown promising efficacy and manageable safety in advanced or metastatic PDAC in the second-line setting, representing a potential option in this patient population.

Sequential vs. concurrent systemic therapies in combination with FOLFOX-HAIC for locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-center, real-world cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Tri-combination therapy based on hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) of infusion fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-HAIC) plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for the locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients have been proven effective. However, whether it was best for these HCC patients to start with the most potent therapeutic pattern was still under debate. This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of FOLFOX-HAIC combined with systemic therapies in the patterns of sequential and concurrent schedules. METHODS: This real-world study included 117 unresectable HCC patients who initially received either FOLFOX-HAIC monotherapy (HAIC group, n = 44) or concurrent ICIs and TKIs (ConHAIC group, n = 73) from March 2020 and June 2022, during the period of FOLFOX-HAIC monotherapy in HAIC group, patients in the HAIC group (n = 30) experienced progressive disease (PD) would have their treatment pattern converted from the FOLFOX-HAIC monotherapy to the combination of FOLFOX-HAIC plus ICIs and TKIs sequentially (SeqHAIC group). The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), as primary outcomes, were compared between patients in the SeqHAIC and ConHAIC groups. RESULTS: The median follow-up time of the SeqHAIC group was 24.92 months (95% CI, 12.74-37.09 months) and of the ConHAIC group was 17.87 months (95% CI, 16.85-18.89 months) and no significant difference was observed in both PFS (HR, 1.572; 95% CI, 0.848-2.916; p = 0.151) and OS (HR, 1.212; 95% CI, 0.574-2.561; p = 0.614) between the SeqHAIC and the ConHAIC groups. As for the tumor responses, there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding tumor responses, overall response rates (p = 0.658) and disease control rates (p = 0.641) were 50.0%, 45.2%, and 83.3%, 89.0% for the SeqHAIC and the ConHAIC groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study revealed that sequential systemic ICIs and TKIs in combination with FOLFOX-HAIC provides similar long-term prognosis and better tolerability compared to concurrent therapy for locally advanced HCC patients. Prospective studies with a larger sample size and longer follow-up are required to validate these findings.

Collagen type I PET/MRI enables evaluation of treatment response in pancreatic cancer in pre-clinical and first-in-human translational studies.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an invasive and rapidly progressive malignancy. A major challenge in patient management is the lack of a reliable imaging tool to monitor tumor response to treatment. Tumor-associated fibrosis characterized by high type I collagen is a hallmark of PDAC, and fibrosis further increases in response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). We hypothesized that molecular positron emission tomography (PET) using a type I collagen-specific imaging probe, 68Ga-CBP8 can detect and measure changes in tumor fibrosis in response to standard treatment in mouse models and patients with PDAC. Methods: We evaluated the specificity of 68Ga-CBP8 PET to tumor collagen and its ability to differentiate responders from non-responders based on the dynamic changes of fibrosis in nude mouse models of human PDAC including FOLFIRNOX-sensitive (PANC-1 and PDAC6) and FOLFIRINOX-resistant (SU.86.86). Next, we demonstrated the specificity and sensitivity of 68Ga-CBP8 to the deposited collagen in resected human PDAC and pancreas tissues. Eight male participant (49-65 y) with newly diagnosed PDAC underwent dynamic 68Ga-CBP8 PET/MRI, and five underwent follow up 68Ga-CBP8 PET/MRI after completing standard CRT. PET parameters were correlated with tumor collagen content and markers of response on histology. Results: 68Ga-CBP8 showed specific binding to PDAC compared to non-binding 68Ga-CNBP probe in two mouse models of PDAC using PET imaging and to resected human PDAC using autoradiography (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). 68Ga-CBP8 PET showed 2-fold higher tumor signal in mouse models following FOLFIRINOX treatment in PANC-1 and PDAC6 models (P < 0.01), but no significant increase after treatment in FOLFIRINOX resistant SU.86.86 model. 68Ga-CBP8 binding to resected human PDAC was significantly higher (P < 0.0001) in treated versus untreated tissue. PET/MRI of PDAC patients prior to CRT showed significantly higher 68Ga-CBP8 uptake in tumor compared to pancreas (SUVmean: 2.35 ± 0.36 vs. 1.99 ± 0.25, P = 0.036, n = 8). PET tumor values significantly increased following CRT compared to untreated tumors (SUVmean: 2.83 ± 0.30 vs. 2.25 ± 0.41, P = 0.01, n = 5). Collagen deposition significantly increased in response to CRT (59 ± 9% vs. 30 ± 9%, P=0.0005 in treated vs. untreated tumors). Tumor and pancreas collagen content showed a positive direct correlation with SUVmean (R2 = 0.54, P = 0.0007). Conclusions: This study demonstrates the specificity of 68Ga-CBP8 PET to tumor type I collagen and its ability to differentiate responders from non-responders based on the dynamic changes of fibrosis in PDAC. The results highlight the potential use of collagen PET as a non-invasive tool for monitoring response to treatment in patients with PDAC.

mFOLFOX6 versus mFOLFOX6 + aflibercept as neoadjuvant treatment in MRI-defined T3-rectal cancer: a randomized phase-II-trial of the German Rectal Cancer Study Group (CAO/ARO/AIO 0214).

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an option for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer at low risk for local recurrence. This randomized phase II trial investigated whether the addition of aflibercept to modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) could improve the rates of centrally confirmed pathological complete remissions (pCR) and (disease-free) survival in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-staged cT3 rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with rectal cancer fulfilling the following criteria were included: lower border of tumor >5 cm and <16 cm from anal verge; circumferential resection margin >2 mm and T3-tumor with a maximum infiltration of 10 mm, as determined by MRI. Patients were randomized 1 : 2 to six cycles mFOLFOX6 ± aflibercept. Surgery was scheduled 4 weeks after chemotherapy. Primary endpoint was the rate of centrally confirmed pCR. The study was designed to detect an improvement of pCR from 10% to 27% (power 80%, type I error 20%). RESULTS: A total of 119 randomized patients started treatment (39 patients mFOLFOX6, arm A, and 80 mFOLFOX + aflibercept, arm B). The incidence of all grade adverse events was similar in both arms, however, adverse events grade ≥3 were more than twice as high in the experimental arm due to hypertension. Surgical complications were comparable. Aflibercept did not improve the pCR rate (arm A 26% versus arm B 19%, P = 0.47) and more patients in arm B had node positivity. With a median follow-up of 40.1 months, the 4-year disease-free survival was 83% in arm A and 85% in arm B (P = 0.82). Only two patients in arm A and one patient in arm B developed local recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and MRI-defined low risk of local recurrence, neoadjuvant mFOLFOX6 + aflibercept was feasible and did not compromise surgery. Survival data were favorable in both arms, but pCR rates were not increased by the addition of aflibercept.

Clinico-biological factors predicting the benefit of the LV5FU2 maintenance strategy as a first-line therapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Predictive markers of LV5FU2 maintenance benefit after first-line induction with FOLFIRINOX in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer are necessary to select patients who will not be harmed by this strategy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We focused on patients who received 12 cycles of FOLFIRINOX (arm A, N = 88) or 8 cycles of FOLFIRINOX followed by LV5FU2 maintenance in controlled patients (arm B, N = 91) from the PRODIGE-35 trial. Prognostic factors and predictors of efficiency were identified by using Cox regression. Median progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and time to deterioration of quality of life (TTD-QoL) were evaluated. RESULTS: Poor independent prognostic factors were primary tumor in place, age <65 years and the presence of liver metastases for PFS, a baseline neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥5 and CA19.9 ≥500 UI/L for OS, independent of the treatment arm. Patients with one metastatic site had a longer PFS in arm A, whereas patients with ≥2 metastatic sites had a longer PFS in arm B. We also identified predictors of OS and TTD-QoL in arm B but these differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Except for patients with one metastatic site who benefited more from 12 cycles of FOLFIRINOX, a maintenance strategy with LV5FU2 should be widely offered to mPC patients whose survival and QoL are preserved after 4 months of FOLFIRINOX. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02352337).

Phase 1b study of first-line fuzuloparib combined with modified FOLFIRINOX followed by fuzuloparib maintenance monotherapy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy remains the standard first-line treatment for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, but with limited efficacy. We aimed to explore the feasibility of adding the PARP inhibitor fuzuloparib to mFOLFIRINOX in the locally advanced/metastatic (LA/M) setting. METHODS: This was the dose-escalation and -expansion, phase 1b portion of a phase 1b/2 study. Patients were given oral fuzuloparib at escalating doses starting at 30 mg twice daily (BID) plus intravenous mFOLFIRINOX q2w for 8-12 cycles, followed by maintenance fuzuloparib at 150 mg BID. Cohorts at the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) and lower dose of fuzuloparib were expanded. Primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), MTD, and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). RESULTS: As of data cutoff on Jan 15, 2023, 39 patients were recruited. 12 patients were enrolled during dose escalation (30 mg [n = 4]; 60 mg [n = 6]; 100 mg [n = 2]). DLT occurred in 1 patient in 60 mg cohort and 1 patient in 100 mg cohort. 60 mg BID was determined to be the MTD, and then 60 and 30 mg cohorts were expanded to 22 and 15 patients, respectively. The most common grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events were hematologic toxicities. Efficacy in 60 mg cohort seemed to be most favorable, with an objective response rate of 50.0% (95% CI, 26.0-74.0) and disease control rate of 94.4% (95% CI, 72.7-99.9). CONCLUSIONS: First-line fuzuloparib plus mFOLFIRINOX followed by maintenance fuzuloparib was generally safe and showed encouraging anti-tumor activity in patients with LA/M pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The RP2D of fuzuloparib combination was 60 mg BID. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04228601.

Familial adenomatous polyposis: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Familial adenomatous polyposis is characterized by the presence of multiple colorectal adenomatous polyps and caused by germline mutations in the tumor suppressor gene and adenomatous polyposis coli, located on chromosome 5q21-q22. Familial adenomatous polyposis occurs in approximately 1/10,000 to 1/30,000 live births, and accounts for less than 1% of all colorectal cancers in the USA. It affects both sexes equally and has a worldwide distribution. The incidence of colon cancer in low- and middle-income countries is rising. In addition to the increasing incidence, lack of early detection and impeded access to optimal multidisciplinary treatment may worsen survival outcomes. Developing quality diagnostic services in the proper health context is crucial for early diagnosis and successful therapy of patients with colorectal cancer, and applying a resource-sensitive approach to prioritize essential treatments on the basis of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness is key to overcoming barriers in low- and middle-income countries. We report a case of familial adenomatous polyposis presenting as adenocarcinoma with multiple colorectal adenomatous polyps. The diagnosis of familial adenomatous polyposis was made by the presence of numerous colorectal adenomatous polyps and family history of colonic adenocarcinoma. Due to its rarity, we decided to report it. CASE PRESENTATION: A 22-year-old Ethiopian female patient presented to Addis Ababa University College of Health science, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia with rectal bleeding. Abdominopelvic computed tomography scan was done and showed distal rectal asymmetric anterior wall thickening in keeping with rectal tumor. Colonoscopy was done and she was diagnosed to have familial adenomatous polyposis with severe dysplasia. In the meantime, colonoscopy guided biopsy was taken and the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma with familial adenomatous polyposis was rendered. For this, total proctocolectomy was carried out. On laparotomy there was also incidental finding of left ovarian deposition for which left salpingo-oophorectomy was done, and 4 weeks after surgical resection, the patient was started on oxaliplatin, leucovorin, fluorouracil chemotherapy regimen. CONCLUSION: In the clinical evaluation of a patient with rectal bleeding, familial adenomatous polyposis must be considered as a differential diagnosis in subjects having family history of colonic adenocarcinoma for early diagnostic workup, management, family genetic counseling, and testing.

Internalization of extracellular vesicles of cancer patients by peripheral blood mononuclear cells during polychemotherapy: connection with neurotoxicity.

Extracellular vesicles (EVs), exhibiting their functional activity after internalization by recipient cells, are involved in the pathogenesis of drug-induced polyneuropathy (DIPN), a common complication of antitumor therapy. In this work, the internalization of EVs obtained from colorectal cancer patients undergoing polychemotherapy and its relationship with neurotoxicity were assessed using a model system of mononuclear leukocytes. Circulating EVs were isolated from 8 colorectal cancer patients who received antitumor therapy according to the FOLFOX or XELOX regimens before the start of chemotherapy (point 1) and after 3-4 courses (point 2). Mononuclear leukocytes of a healthy donor served as a cellular model system for EV internalization in vitro. EV internalization was assessed using fluorescence microscopy. It was shown that internalization of EVs obtained from colorectal cancer patients with high neurotoxicity was higher than in the group with low neurotoxicity. The ability of CD11b-positive (CD11b⁺) and CD11b-negative (CD11b⁻) mononuclear leukocytes of a healthy donor to internalize EVs obtained from patients before and after chemotherapy did not reveal significant differences. A direct relationship was found between the relative number of CD11b⁻ cells with internalized EVs and the integral index of neurotoxicity according to the NRS scale at the peak of its manifestation (point 2) (r=0.675, p.

Biomarker-stratified first-line treatment of right-sided metastatic colon cancer with interdisciplinary collaboration in the IVOPAK II trial.

Patients with right-sided metastatic colon carcinoma have a significantly worse prognosis than those with left-sided colorectal cancer (CRC), regardless of treatment. The aim of the prospective IVOPAK II study was to implement an interdisciplinary guideline-conform personalized CRC palliative therapy of metastatic colorectal carcinoma and to improve the overall survival (OS) by multidisciplinary approach via secondary metastatic resection. We present the efficacy data of first-line treatment and the benefit of interdisciplinary collaboration of right-sided metastatic colon carcinoma patients: n  = 25. RAS mutation: n  = 20 (80%): received systemic first-line treatment: FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab. All-RAS-wildtype: n  = 5 (20%): received systemic first-line treatment: FOLFIRI plus cetuximab. Last date evaluation: 31 January 2024. Median age: 59.6 years (range 42-71), men/women: 14/11. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) index: 0/1/2 : 11/10/4. Evaluable for response: n  = 25. Complete response: n  = 0, partial response: n  = 14 (56%), stable disease: n  = 8 (32%), progressive disease: n  = 3 (12%), early tumor shrinkage: n  = 13 (52%), estimates progression-free survival: 13 months (95% CI 8-17 months), estimated OS: 48 months (95% CI 25-71 months), median follow-up: 26 months (1-61 months), no evidence of disease: n  = 4 (16%). A chemotherapy doublette regimen with FOLFIRI plus a biological as first-line treatment shows promising efficacy and secondary metastatic resection after interdisciplinary discussion was associated with a survival benefit in right-sided metastatic colon carcinoma.

First-line Chemotherapy in Combination With Oral Recombinant Methioninase and a Low-methionine Diet for a Stage IV Inoperable Pancreatic-Cancer Patient Resulted in 40% Tumor Reduction and an 86% CA19-9 Biomarker Decrease.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Pancreatic cancer has a very poor prognosis with a 5-year survival rate of less than 5% among patients with distant metastasis, a figure that has not improved over many decades. Only 10 to 20% patients are candidates for curative surgery at presentation due to the aggressive nature and asymptomatic progression of pancreatic cancer. Although first-line chemotherapy, such as FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine + nab paclitaxel, improved the median survival from 8.5 to 11.1 months, more effective treatments are immediately needed. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of methionine restriction with oral rMETase (o-rMETase) and a low-methionine diet combined with first-line chemotherapy on a patient with stage IV metastatic pancreatic cancer. CASE REPORT: A 63-year-old female was diagnosed with metastatic pancreatic cancer in October 2023. The patient started FOLFIRINOX as first-line chemotherapy in combination with methionine restriction, which comprised o-rMETase 250 units twice a day and a low-methionine diet. The patient was monitored using computed tomography and CA19-9 blood tests. After five months from the start of combination therapy, the size of the primary tumor decreased by 40% along with liver-metastasis regression. The CA19-9 blood marker decreased by 86%. The patient sustains a high performance status and continues the combination therapy without severe side effects. CONCLUSION: Methionine restriction consisting of o-rMETase and a low-methionine diet, in combination with first-line chemotherapy, was highly effective in a patient with inoperable stage IV pancreatic cancer.

Germline BRCA1-Mutated Synchronous and Metachronous Pancreatic Acinar Cell Carcinoma With Long-Term Survival.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma (PACC) is a rare pancreatic neoplasm. Recently, molecular analysis revealed that PACC shows a high frequency of the BRCA1/2 mutation and is likely to be considered a cancer associated with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). Hereditary cancers, including HBOC, are characterized by multifocal and/or metachronous tumors. However, no case reports exist of germline BRCA1-mutated synchronous and metachronous PACC. CASE: A 58-year-old man was diagnosed with synchronous and metachronous PACC at the age of 56 and underwent two surgeries. Ten months after the second surgery, the patient developed multiple liver metastases. Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel therapy was administered as first-line chemotherapy. After seven cycles, computed tomography examination revealed progressive disease (PD). Therefore, modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) was administered as second- line chemotherapy. After 19 cycles of mFFX, comprehensive cancer genomic profiling (CGP) identified a BRCA1 pathogenic variant that was confirmed to be germline origin. Accordingly, we treated the patient with olaparib; however, he was diagnosed with PD after 4 months. He subsequently died 5 years and 9 months after the initial surgery, and 3 years and 10 months after chemotherapy. Based on the genetic data of the patients, his family members received genetic counseling followed by cascade testing. Consequently, the same gBRCA1 pathogenic variant was detected in the son and his surveillance for HBOC-related cancers was initiated. CONCLUSION: We diagnosed a 58-year-old man with a synchronous and metachronous PACC with germline BRCA1 pathogenic variant. Considering that PACC is likely to have BRCA1/2 mutations responsible for HBOC, we need to be aware of the possible presence of multifocal and/or metachronous tumors in patients with PACC. Additionally, patients with PACC should undergo genetic examinations, which would be beneficial in determining treatment strategies and health care for blood relatives.

A multicenter, prospective, non-interventional real-world study to assess the effectiveness of mecapegfilgrastim in preventing neutropenia in patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Mecapegfilgrastim, a long-acting granulocyte-colony stimulating factor has been approved for reducing the incidence of infection, particularly febrile neutropenia (FN), in China. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a multicenter prospective observational study to examine the safety and effectiveness of mecapegfilgrastim in preventing neutropenia in gastrointestinal patients receiving the chemotherapy, including S-1/capecitabine-based regimens or the fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI)/fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX)/fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX) regimens. METHOD: Five hundred and sixty-one gastrointestinal patients from 40 sites across China, between May 2019 and November 2021, were included. The administration of mecapegfilgrastim was prescribed at the discretion of local physicians. RESULTS: The most common adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of any grade for all patients was increased white blood cells (2.9%). Grade 3/4 ADRs were observed for anemia (0.2%), decreased white blood cells (0.2%), and decreased neutrophil count (0.2%). Among the 116 patients who received S-1/capecitabine-based chemotherapy throughout all cycles, ADRs of any grade included anemia (1.7%), myalgia (0.9%), and increased alanine aminotransferase (0.9%). No grade 3/4 ADRs were observed. In 414 cycles of patients who underwent S-1/capecitabine-based regimens, only one (0.2%) cycle experienced grade 4 neutropenia. In the FOLFIRINOX, FOLFOXIRI, and FOLFOX chemotherapy regimens, grade 4 neutropenia occurred in one (2.7%) of 37 cycles, four (4.7%) of 85 cycles, and two (1.2%) of 167 cycles, respectively. CONCLUSION: In a real-world setting, mecapegfilgrastim has proven effective in preventing severe neutropenia in gastrointestinal patients following chemotherapy. This includes commonly used moderate or high-risk FN regimens or regimens containing S1/capecitabine, all of which have demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety profiles.

Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer: An Observational Cohort Study.

Early pancreatic cancer diagnosis is crucial for timely intervention and better outcomes. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has disrupted routine health care globally. The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted routine health care globally. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer. This retrospective study compared pancreatic cancer patients from 2 tertiary hospitals in pre and COVID-19 periods. Pre-COVID-19 period spanned from January 1, 2018, to January 19, 2020, while the COVID-19 period extended from January 20, 2020, to December 31, 2021. Results: A total of 542 patients were included. In the pre-COVID-19 period, 280 new cases of pancreatic cancer were enrolled, compared to 262 during COVID-19. The annual incidence rates were 136.63 and 134.50 patients, respectively. The median age was significantly lower during COVID-19 (71.5 years) compared to pre-COVID-19 (77 years) (P < .001). In subgroup analyses for stage 3 and 4, the proportion of stage 4 pancreatic cancer increased during COVID-19 (χ2 = 5.53, P = .019), and the COVID-19 group had younger diagnoses, better performance status, more surgery, higher use of FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy, fewer hospital referrals, and better median overall survival compared to the pre-COVID-19 group. This study revealed changes in the characteristics and treatment of patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although further large-scale research is necessary, the findings of this study can function as foundational data for formulating policies for the management of patients with pancreatic cancer during future pandemics of other infectious diseases.

[Long-Term Survival of a Case with Peritoneal Dissemination from Appendiceal Goblet Cell Carcinoid Treated with Systemic Chemotherapy].

A 64-year-old man complained of lower abdominal pain and vomiting. The CT scan showed adhesional ileus; therefore, small bowel resection procedure was performed. Histological findings showed signet-ring cell carcinoma and poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. We performed ileocecal resection as an additional surgery. The operative findings revealed peritoneal nodules. The histological findings suggested goblet cell carcinoid with peritoneal dissemination. mFOLFOX+bevacizumab was administered, and no progression was observed for 30 months after the surgery. Appendiceal goblet cell carcinoid is rare and its prognosis is poor. Here, we report a case of appendiceal GCC that achieved a relatively long-term survival despite peritoneal dissemination.

Transarterial (chemo)embolisation versus systemic chemotherapy for colorectal cancer liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: The liver is affected by two groups of malignant tumours: primary liver cancers and liver metastases. Liver metastases are significantly more common than primary liver cancer, and five-year survival after radical surgical treatment of liver metastases ranges from 28% to 50%, depending on primary cancer site. However, R0 resection (resection for cure) is not feasible in most people; therefore, other treatments have to be considered in the case of non-resectability. One possible option is based on the concept that the blood supply to hepatic tumours originates predominantly from the hepatic artery. Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) of the peripheral branches of the hepatic artery can be achieved by administering a chemotherapeutic drug followed by vascular occlusive agents and can lead to selective necrosis of the cancer tissue while leaving normal liver parenchyma virtually unaffected. The entire procedure can be performed without infusion of chemotherapy and is then called bland transarterial embolisation (TAE). These procedures are usually applied over a few sessions. Another possible treatment option is systemic chemotherapy which, in the case of colorectal cancer metastases, is most commonly performed using FOLFOX (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) and FOLFIRI (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and irinotecan) regimens applied in multiple sessions over a long period of time. These therapies disrupt the cell cycle, leading to death of rapidly dividing malignant cells. Current guidelines determine the role of TAE and TACE as non-curative treatment options applicable in people with liver-only or liver-dominant metastatic disease that is unresectable or non-ablatable, and in people who have failed systemic chemotherapy. Regarding the treatment modalities in people with colorectal cancer liver metastases, we found no systematic reviews comparing the efficacy of TAE or TACE versus systemic chemotherapy. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of transarterial embolisation (TAE) or transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) compared with systemic chemotherapy in people with liver-dominant unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and three additional databases up to 4 April 2024. We also searched two trials registers and the European Medicines Agency database and checked reference lists of retrieved publications. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised clinical trials assessing beneficial and harmful effects of TAE or TACE versus systemic chemotherapy in adults (aged 18 years or older) with colorectal cancer liver metastases. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were all-cause mortality; overall survival (time to mortality); and any adverse events or complications. Our secondary outcomes were cancer mortality; health-related quality of life; progression-free survival; proportion of participants dying or surviving with progression of the disease; time to progression of liver metastases; recurrence of liver metastases; and tumour response measures (complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease). For the purpose of the review and to perform necessary analyses, whenever possible, we converted survival rates to mortality rates, as this was our primary outcome. For the analysis of dichotomous outcomes, we used the risk ratio (RR); for continuous outcomes, we used the mean difference; and for time to event outcomes, we calculated hazard ratios (HRs), all with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We used the standardised mean difference with 95% CIs when the trials used different instruments. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome. We based our conclusions on outcomes analysed at the longest follow-up. MAIN RESULTS: We included three trials with 118 participants randomised to TACE versus 120 participants to systemic chemotherapy. Four participants were excluded; one due to disease progression prior to treatment and three due to decline in health. The trials reported data on one or more outcomes. Two trials were performed in China and one in Italy. The trials differed in terms of embolisation techniques and chemotherapeutic agents. Follow-up ranged from 12 months to 50 months. TACE may reduce mortality at longest follow-up (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.94; 3 trials, 234 participants; very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. TACE may have little to no effect on overall survival (time to mortality) (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.01; 1 trial, 70 participants; very low-certainty evidence), any adverse events or complications (3 trials, 234 participants; very low-certainty evidence), health-related quality of life (2 trials, 154 participants; very low-certainty evidence), progression-free survival (1 trial, 70 participants; very low-certainty evidence), and tumour response measures (presented as the overall response rate) (RR 1.81, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.96; 3 trials, 234 participants; very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. No trials reported cancer mortality, proportion of participants dying or surviving with progression of the disease, and recurrence of liver metastases. We found no trials comparing the effects of TAE versus systemic chemotherapy in people with colorectal cancer liver metastases. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The evidence regarding effectiveness of TACE versus systemic chemotherapy in people with colorectal cancer liver metastases is of very low certainty and is based on three trials. Our confidence in the results is limited due to the risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, and imprecision. It is very uncertain whether TACE confers benefits with regard to reduction in mortality, overall survival (time to mortality), reduction in adverse events or complications, improvement in health-related quality of life, improvement in progression-free survival, and tumour response measures (presented as the overall response rate). Data on cancer mortality, proportion of participants dying or surviving with progression of the disease, and recurrence of liver metastases are lacking. We found no trials assessing TAE versus systemic chemotherapy. More randomised clinical trials are needed to strengthen the body of evidence and provide insight into the benefits and harms of TACE or TAE in comparison with systemic chemotherapy in people with liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

Mature MUC5AC Expression in Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Predicts Treatment Response and Outcomes.

Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for early-stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) has recently gained prominence. We investigated the clinical significance of mucin 5 AC (MUC5AC), which exists in two major glycoforms, a less-glycosylated immature isoform (IM) and a heavily glycosylated mature isoform (MM), as a biomarker in resected PDA. Immunohistochemistry was performed on 100 resected PDAs to evaluate the expression of the IM and MM of MUC5AC using their respective monoclonal antibodies, CLH2 (NBP2-44455) and 45M1 (ab3649). MUC5AC localization (cytoplasmic, apical, and extra-cellular (EC)) was determined, and the H-scores were calculated. Univariate and multivariate (MVA) Cox regression models were used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Of 100 resected PDA patients, 43 received NAT, and 57 were treatment-naïve with upfront surgery (UpS). In the study population (n = 100), IM expression (H-scores for objective response vs. no response vs. UpS = 104 vs. 152 vs. 163, p = 0.01) and MM-MUC5AC detection rates (56% vs. 63% vs. 82%, p = 0.02) were significantly different. In the NAT group, MM-MUC5AC-negative patients had significantly better PFS according to the MVA (Hazard Ratio: 0.2, 95% CI: 0.059-0.766, p = 0.01). Similar results were noted in a FOLFIRINOX sub-group (n = 36). We established an association of MUC5AC expression with treatment response and outcomes.

Transcriptome-based classification to predict FOLFIRINOX response in a real-world metastatic pancreatic cancer cohort.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is often diagnosed at metastatic stage and typically treated with fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX). Few patients benefit from this treatment. Molecular subtypes are prognostic in particularly resectable PDAC and might predict treatment response. This study aims to correlate molecular subtypes in metastatic PDAC with FOLFIRINOX responses using real-world data, providing assistance in counselling patients. We collected 131 RNA-sequenced metastatic biopsies and applied a network-based meta-analysis using published PDAC classifiers. Subsequent survival analysis was performed using the most suitable classifier. For validation, we developed an immunohistochemistry (IHC) classifier using GATA6 and keratin-17 (KRT17), and applied it to 86 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples of advanced PDAC. Lastly, GATA6 knockdown models were generated in PDAC organoids and cell lines. We showed that the PurIST classifier was the most suitable classifier. With this classifier, classical tumors had longer PFS and OS than basal-like tumors (PFS: 216 vs. 78 days, p = 0.0002; OS: 251 vs. 195 days, p = 0.049). The validation cohort showed a similar trend. Importantly, IHC GATA6low patients had significantly shorter survival with FOLFIRINOX (323 vs. 746 days, p = 0.006), but no difference in non-treated patients (61 vs. 54 days, p = 0.925). This suggests that GATA6 H-score predicts therapy response. GATA6 knockdown models did not lead to increased FOLFIRINOX responsiveness. These data suggest a predictive role for subtyping (transcriptomic and GATA6 IHC), though no direct causal relationship was found between GATA6 expression and chemoresistance. GATA6 immunohistochemistry should be seamlessly added to current diagnostics and integrated into upcoming clinical trials.