Successful application of percutaneous endoscopic cholangioscopy + electrohydraulic lithotripsy for hepatolithiasis post-liver transplantation: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation in pediatric patients is a crucial intervention for treating end-stage hepatic diseases. Despite significant advances in surgical techniques and postoperative care, complications remain a substantial challenge in this population. Biliary stones, an infrequent complication, present challenges in this context. Given the impossibility of endoscopic treatments, different strategies have been explored to address post-liver transplantation gallstones in children by implementing percutaneous treatment with intraductal lithotripsy. CASE PRESENTATION: A 7-year-old Latin patient, who had a diagnosis of biliary atresia at the age of 2, underwent a liver transplant from a living donor. However, 4 months after the transplant, the patient experienced recurring episodes of cholangitis. Cholangioresonance revealed intrahepatic lithiasis and anastomotic stenosis. Attempted gallstone removal through percutaneous cholangiography proved unsuccessful, as multiple peripheral stones in all ducts remained immobile. Subsequently, a percutaneous endoscopic cholangioscopy using the SpyGlass Discover system for visual examination of the bile ducts + electrohydraulic lithotripsy was performed, effectively removing the stones without any complications. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous cholangioscopy with intraductal lithotripsy enables accurate identification and extraction of intrahepatic stones without the need for surgical intervention. This method proves to be a valuable alternative in addressing post-transplant biliary stone. In our case, it was performed on a pediatric patient who underwent liver transplantation, which makes it interesting and relevant as there is currently insufficient literature on this approach in such cases in this population.

PCNL vs. two staged RIRS for kidney stones greater than 20 mm: systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is considered the gold standard treatment for kidney stones greater than 20 mm. However, retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) may achieve the same stone-free rate with repeated procedures, and potentially fewer complications. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of PCNL and two-staged RIRS. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We conducted a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science for studies comparing PCNL and RIRS for kidney stones greater than 20mm. The primary outcome is stone-free rate (SFR) of PCNL and RIRS (repeated once if needed). Secondary outcomes were SFR of PCNL versus RIRS (single procedure), operative time, hospital stay, need for auxiliary procedures, and complications. We performed a subgroup analysis for randomized trials, non-randomized trials, and patients with solitary kidney. We performed a trial sequential analysis for the main outcome. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We included 31 articles, with 1987 patients in the PCNL and 1724 patients in RIRS. We confirmed the traditional result that after a single procedure PCNL has a higher SFR. We also found that comparing the SFR of PCNL and RIRS, repeated up to two times if needed, no difference in SFR was observed. Surprisingly, only 26% (CI95 23%-28%) of the patients required a second RIRS. In the trial sequential analysis, the last point of the z-curve was within futility borders. We observed that PCNL has a higher incidence of complications (RR=1.51; CI95 1.24, 1.83; P<0.0001; I2=28%), specifically CD2 (RR=1.82; CI95 1.30, 2.54; P=0.0004; I2=26%) and longer hospital stay (MD 2.57; 2.18, 2.96; P<0.00001; I2-98%). No difference was observed regarding operative time. CONCLUSIONS: RIRS repeated up to two times is equivalent to PCNL in terms of the SFR and may have the same safety.

Comparison of intravascular lithotripsy and rotational atherectomy for the treatment of heavily calcified coronary lesions: the STIFF ( S tenoses with calcificaTIon treated with angioplasty e FF ected with dedicated interventional tools) study.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary interventions in heavily calcified coronary lesions are associated with technical difficulties and the worse prognosis. Lesion preparation is important to reduce complications and improve outcomes. The aim of this study is to compare the results of rotational atherectomy (RA) and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) at achieving optimal stent implantation using intravascular ultrasound criteria. METHODS: Retrospective, single-center study comparing patients with heavily calcified coronary lesions that underwent percutaneous coronary interventions using RA or IVL. RESULTS IN TOTAL: 25 patients (13 in the RA group and 12 in the IVL group) were included. Reference vessel diameter was similar between the groups [2.59 (2.51-3.63) mm in the RA group vs. 2.79 (2.59-3.16) mm in the IVL group; P = 0.89], as were minimal lumen area [1.02 (0.80-1.23) mm vs. 1.40 (1.01-1.40) mm; P = 0.43] and diameter stenosis [60.4% (52.3-72.3) vs. 56.1% (47.8-61.3); P = 0.56). The final minimal lumen area was significantly larger in the IVL group [7.6 mm 2 (5.8-8.6) vs. 5.4 mm 2 (4.5-6.2); P = 0.01] as were lumen area gain [4.1 mm 2 (2.6-5.9) vs. 2.3 mm 2 (1.4-3.6); P = 0.01] and final stent volume [491.2 mm 3 (372.2-729.8) vs. 326.2 mm 3 (257.1-435.4); P = 0.03]. In the RA group, 69.2% of the patients achieved the preestablished intravascular ultrasound-based criteria for successful stent implantation, vs. 100% of the patients in the IVL group ( P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Patients in the IVL group achieved the Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Angiography-Guided Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation trial criteria of successful stent implantation more frequently than those treated with RA.

Litotricia endovascular para el tratamiento de la calcificación arterial periférica / Endovascular lithotripsy for the treatment of peripheral arterial calcification

DESCRIPCIÓN Y CARACTERÍSTICAS TÉCNICAS DE LA TECNOLOGIA: La litotricia es un tratamiento bien caracterizado, adoptado para los cálculos renales calcificados, en los que las calcificaciones se fragmentan mediante ondas de choque acústicas de alta potencia (2). La litoplastia es una tecnología basada en la litotricia, en la que varios emisores montados en un catéter con balón tradicional, proporcionan energía pulsátil circunferencial para actuar sobre la placa calcificada (a nivel profundo y superficial), fracturándola, proporcionando de inmediato un incremento en la luz vascular y respetando la integridad del vaso. El sistema de litotricia intravascular (LIV) de Shockwave Medical (1) integra un generador portátil, un cable conector y un catéter desechable estéril de un solo uso que contiene múltiples emisores de litotricia incluidos en el balón integrado en dicho catéter. El dispositivo LIV para su uso en arterias periféricas está disponible en distintos tamaños y 2 longitudes de catéter: 110 cm con diámetros de 3,5 mm a 7 mm y longitud de balón de 60mm y 135 cm con diámetros de 2,5mm a 4mm y longitud de balón de 40mm. DESCRIPCIÓN DEL PROBLEMA DE SALUD: La enfermedad arterial periférica (EAP) de origen arterioesclerótico, que se caracteriza por el depósito lipídico y la calcificación de las paredes arteriales, afecta muy frecuentemente a las arterias de las extremidades inferiores (4) y su asociación con la enfermedad coronaria y cerebrovascular ha

Assessing safety and efficacy of flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy in elderly patients / Evaluación de la seguridad y eficacia de la ureteroscopia flexible y la litotricia láser en pacientes de edad avanzada

Objective: The objective of the study was to determine the efficacy and safety of flexible ureteroscopy (F-URS) for the management of intrarenal or proximal ureteral lithiasis in aged patients. Materials and methods: In this retrospective, multicenter observational study, we collected the anonymized clinical data of patients who underwent F-URS at two institutions in Cali, Colombia between June 2015 and May 2018. The patients were divided into two groups based on age: Group A defined as aged patients (> 65 years) and Group B as patients of non-advanced age (< 65 years). Results: A total of 201 patients were included in this study. The average age for Group A was 75 years (± 4.5) and for Group B was 51 years (± 10). The anesthetic risk classification (American Society of Anesthesiology [ASA]) and comorbidities were significantly higher for Group A with an ASA II and III of 74% versus 50% in Group B. No significant differences were shown in the stone-free rates (SFRs) or significant ureteral injury (Grade III and IV). There was no difference in intraoperative or post-operative complications between both groups. Conclusions: Age > 65 years was not associated with a negative impact on the outcomes of F-URS for the management of intrarenal or proximal ureteral lithiasis in this cohort of patients. F-URS appears as a safe and effective procedure and should not be withheld from older patients

Objetivo: Determinar la efectividad y seguridad de la ureteroscopia flexible (F-URS) para el manejo de la litiasis ureteral intrarrenal o proximal en pacientes ancianos. Materiales y métodos: En este estudio observacional multicéntrico y retrospectivo, se recogieron los datos clínicos de los pacientes sometidos a F-URS en dos instituciones de Cali, Colombia, entre junio de 2015 y mayo de 2018. Los pacientes se dividieron en dos grupos según la edad. El grupo A se definió como pacientes de edad avanzada (> 65 años) y el grupo B como pacientes de edad no avanzada (< 65 años). Resultados: Un total de 201 pacientes fueron incluidos en este estudio. La edad media para el grupo A fue de 75 años (± 4,5) y para el grupo B fue de 51 años (± 10). La clasificación de riesgo anestésico (ASA) y las comorbilidades fueron significativamente mayores para el grupo A con un ASA II y III del 74% frente al 50% en el grupo B. No se observaron diferencias significativas en las tasas libres de cálculos ni en la lesión ureteral significativa (grado III y IV). No hubo diferencias en las complicaciones anestésicas, intraoperatorias o postoperatorias entre ambos grupos. Conclusiones: La edad > 65 años no se asoció con un impacto negativo en los resultados urológicos ni en la tasa de éxito de la F-URS para el manejo de la litiasis ureteral intrarrenal o proximal en esta cohorte de pacientes. La F-URS es un procedimiento seguro y eficaz, y no debe contraindicarse en los pacientes de edad avanzada

Does displacement of lower pole stones during retrograde intrarenal surgery improves stone-free status? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Kidney stones are one of the most common urological diseases worldwide. The size and location of the stone are the most important factors in determining the most suitable treatment options. The aim of this review was to evaluate the displacement of lower pole stones. METHODS: Three studies assessing the efficacy of translocating kidney stones from the lower pole of the kidney to other locations during retrograde intrarenal surgery published in the last 20 years were included. A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), and Web of Science databases using the following search terms: "Lower pole," "Lithotripsy." Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager version 5.4. RESULTS: Stone-free rates were improved through displacement (odds ratio - OR = -0.15; 95% confidence interval-95%CI -0.24--0.05; p = 0.002; I2 = 21%), but at the cost of increased surgical duration (mean difference = -12.50; 95%CI -24.06--0.95; p = 0.03; I2 = 94%). Although this represents a potentially negative outcome, the improvement in clearance rates justifies the additional investment of time and effort. CONCLUSIONS: Displacement of lower pole kidney stones for subsequent lithotripsy brings significant benefits in terms of stone-free rate, with no difference in laser energy usage. However, it results in increased surgical time. Despite these factors, the benefits to patients undergoing the procedure are substantial.

Patient's preferences: an unmet need by current urolithiasis guidelines: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Shared decision making (SDM) in surgical specialties was demonstrated to diminish decisional regret, decisional anxiety and decisional conflict. Urolithiasis guidelines do not explicit patient preference to choose treatment. The aim of this review article was to perform a systematic evaluation of published evidence regarding SDM in urinary stone treatment. METHODS: A systematic review in accordance PRISMA checklist was conducted using the MEDLINE (PubMed) database. Inclusion criteria were studies that evaluated stone treatment preferences. Reviews, editorials, case reports and video abstracts were excluded. ROBUST checklist was used to assess quality of the studies. RESULTS: 188 articles were obtained. After applying the predefined selection criteria, seven articles were included for final analysis. Six out of seven studies were questionnaires that propose clinical scenarios and treatment alternatives. The last study was a patient preference trial. A general trend among included studies showed a patient preference towards the least invasive option (SWL over URS). The main reasons to choose one treatment over the other were stone-free rates, risk of complications and invasiveness. DISCUSSION: This review provides an overview of the patients' preferences towards stone treatment in small- and medium-sized stones. There was a clear preference towards the least invasive management strategy. The main reason was less invasiveness. This is opposed to the global trends of performing more ureteroscopies and less SWL. Physicians played a pivotal role in counselling patients. SDM should be encouraged and improved. The main limitation of this study is the characteristics of the included studies.

[Coronary lithotripsy in calcified lesions: fragmented calcium]. / Litotricia coronaria en lesiones calcificadas: fragmentando el calcio.

Background: Complex calcified coronary lesions are a frequent finding during percutaneous coronary intervention, representing for decades a challenge and limitation in patients with indication of revascularization, due to suboptimal angiographic results, high incidence of perioperative complications and long-term adverse events despite the multiple strategies employed, such as the use of cutting balloon, high-pressure balloons or rotational or orbital atherectomy, interventions with limitations that have hindered its routine use, recently a new plaque modification technique known as coronary intravascular lithotripsy has burst into the treatment of this complex entity, which consists in the use of a specially modified balloon for the emission of pulsatile mechanical energy (sonic pressure waves) that allows modifying the calcified plate. Clinical case: By presenting a series of clinical cases and reviewing the literature, our initial experience is presented, key elements are summarized and discussed in the understanding of this new intervention technique necessary for decision making. Conclusion: Coronary intravascular lithotripsy is projected as a promising technique for the modification and preparation of superficial and deep calcified coronary lesions, through microfractures that allow the apposition and effective expansion of the stent, strategy that according to different trials (Disrupt CAD series, SOLSTICE assay) and records presents a high efficiency and good safety profile, data consistent with our initial experience.

Introducción: las lesiones coronarias calcificadas complejas son un hallazgo frecuente durante el intervencionismo coronario percutáneo, han representado durante décadas un desafío y limitante en pacientes con indicación de revascularización, debido a resultados angiográficos subóptimos, alta incidencia de complicaciones perioperatorias y eventos adversos a largo plazo a pesar de las múltiples estrategias empleadas, como el uso de balones de corte, balones de alta presión o la aterectomía rotacional u orbital, intervenciones con limitantes que han dificultado su uso rutinario. Recientemente, una nueva técnica de modificación de placa conocida como litotricia intravascular coronaria ha irrumpido en el tratamiento de esta compleja entidad, la cual consiste en la utilización de un balón especialmente modificado para la emisión de energía mecánica pulsátil (ondas de presión sónicas) que permite modificar la placa calcificada. Caso clínico: mediante la presentación de una serie de casos clínico y revisión de literatura se presenta nuestra experiencia inicial, se resume y discuten elementos claves en el entendimiento de esta nueva técnica de intervencionismo necesarios para la toma de decisiones. Conclusión: la litotricia intravascular coronaria se proyecta como una técnica prometedora para la modificación y preparación de lesiones coronarias calcificadas superficiales y profundas, mediante microfracturas que permiten la aposición y expansión efectiva del stent; estrategia que de acuerdo con diferentes ensayos (serie Disrupt CAD, ensayo SOLSTICE) y registros presenta una eficacia alta y buen perfil de seguridad, datos concordantes con nuestra experiencia inicial.

Effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in urolithiasis patients under 2 years of age.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we present our extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) outcomes in urolithiasis patients under the age of two. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The procedure was performed with patients < 2 years of age sedated, under anesthesia using ketamine and Dormicum (midazolam), in the supine position. Fragmentation was evaluated by fluoroscopy after the procedure. RESULTS: A total of 74 procedures were performed on 65 kidneys. One patient with bilateral stones had two sessions of ESWL on the right side; three sessions of ESWL were performed in one patient with a unilateral stone, and two sessions were performed in seven patients with unilateral stones. All other patients underwent one session of ESWL. As post-procedural complications, hematuria was observed in 14 patients (12 mild and 2 significant), and vomiting occurred in 1 patient. Ureterorenoscopy was performed in 5 patients, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in 6 patients due to a failed procedure. CONCLUSION: As a result, ESWL treatment is effective and has advantages such as a short hospitalization time, good reproducibility, cost-effectiveness, and a low rate of complications. Therefore, we recommend ESWL as the first-line treatment for renal and proximal ureteral stones in infants < 2 years of age.

OBIETIVO: En este estudio, presentamos nuestros resultados de ESWL en pacientes con urolitiasis menores de dos años. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: El procedimiento se realizó con pacientes menores de dos años sedados, bajo anestesia con ketamina y Dormicum (midazolam), en posición supina. La fragmentación se evaluó mediante fluoroscopia después del procedimiento. RESULTADOS: Se realizaron total de 74 procedimientos en 65 riñones. Un paciente con cálculos bilaterales tuvo dos sesiones de ESWL en el lado derecho; se realizaron tres sesiones de LEOC en un paciente con litiasis unilateral y dos sesiones en siete pacientes con litiasis unilateral. Todos los demás pacientes se sometieron a una sesión de ESWL. Como complicaciones post-procedimiento se observó hematuria en 14 pacientes (12 leves y 2 significativas) y vómitos en 1 paciente. Se realizó URS en 5 pacientes y NLP en 6 pacientes debido a un procedimiento fallido. CONCLUSIONES: Como resultado, el tratamiento de la ESWL es efectivo y tiene ventajas como un tiempo de hospitalización corto, buena reproducibilidad, costo-efectividad y baja tasa de complicaciones. Por tanto, recomendamos la ESWL como tratamiento de primera línea para cálculos renales y ureterales proximales en bebés < 2 años de edad.

Clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of difficult biliary stones in a reference hospital in Colombia.

The local experience and the success rate of different available treatments for difficult biliary stones in Colombia are poorly described. We made an observational study reporting patients treated for difficult biliary stones, at Hospital Universitario San Ignacio in Bogotá, Colombia between January 2015, and November 2021. Clinical characteristics, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) findings, and outcomes are presented. Additionally, the success rates of Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Plus Large Balloon Dilation (ESLBD), Mechanical Lithotripsy (ML), temporary stenting (TS), cholangioscopy-guided laser lithotripsy (CGLL), and surgery are described. A total of 146 patients were included (median age 69 years, IQR 58.5-78.5, 33.8% men). The median stone diameter was 15 mm (IQR 10 - 18 mm). One stone was presented in 39.9%, two stones in 18.2%, and ≥3 stones in the remaining stone. A 67.6% disproportion rate was observed between the stone and distal common bile duct. Successful stone extraction was achieved in 56.2% in the first procedure, 22.6% in the second, 17.1% in the third, 3.4% in the fourth, and 0.7% in the fifth procedures. The successful extraction rates were 56.8% for ESLBD, 75% for ML, 23.4% for TS, 57.7% for CGLL, and 100% for surgery. Endoscopic management of difficult stones is usually successful, although it usually requires 2 or more ERCPs procedures. The surgical requirements were low. ESLBD is an effective technique unlike TS. Few patients required advanced techniques such as ML or CGLL. Endoscopic procedures are associated with a low rate of complications.

Dusting efficacy between the regular setting of holmium laser (Ho:YAG) versus Vapor Tunnel pulse modality for non-complex kidney stones.

The new pulse modality Vapor-Tunnel™ (VT) consists of a very long pulse that uses the minimum peak power, causing the energy to pass through a previously created vapor channel or tunnel. The first part of the pulse creates a vapor channel, whereas the remaining energy is discharged immediately after, passing straight through the previously created tunnel. The aim of this study is to compare the dusting efficacy between Ho:YAG laser with long pulse and Ho:YAG laser with VT for non-complex kidney stones. A retrospective comparative study of 236 patients who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery using Ho:YAG laser (long pulse vs. VT) was performed. Stone size, stone density, laser settings, laser emission time, and total operative time were recorded. We also assessed the lithotripsy efficacy (J/mm3). The stone-free rate was defined as the absence of stone fragments in a non-contrast abdominal computed tomography 4 weeks after the procedure. A total of 118 patients were included in each group. There was no significant difference in age, gender, and body mass index. Median stone volume (737 mm3 vs. 636 mm3) and stone density (788 HU vs. 656 HU) were higher in the VT group. Total energy used (14.5 J vs. 18.2 J), the laser emission time (20 min vs. 26 min), and the total operative time (79.5 min vs. 95 min) were significantly lower in the VT group. The stone-free rate was comparable between both groups (74.5% for VT and 66.1% for the long-pulse group, p = 0.15). When we evaluated the efficacy of laser lithotripsy, a significantly lower difference was obtained in the VT group (median 12.5 J/mm3 vs. median 23.1 J/mm3). The VT pulse modality was associated with decreased laser time and operative time. Additionally, it increased lithotripsy efficacy compared to Ho:YAG long pulse laser, but with a comparable free-stone rate.

Does displacement of lower pole stones during retrograde intrarenal surgery improves stone-free status?: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose: Kidney stones are one of the most common urological diseases worldwide. The size and location of the stone are the most important factors in determining the most suitable treatment options. The aim of this review was to evaluate the displacement of lower pole stones. Methods: Three studies assessing the efficacy of translocating kidney stones from the lower pole of the kidney to other locations during retrograde intrarenal surgery published in the last 20 years were included. A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), and Web of Science databases using the following search terms: "Lower pole," "Lithotripsy." Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager version 5.4. Results: Stone-free rates were improved through displacement (odds ratio - OR = -0.15; 95% confidence interval-95%CI -0.24--0.05; p = 0.002; I2 = 21%), but at the cost of increased surgical duration (mean difference = -12.50; 95%CI -24.06--0.95; p = 0.03; I2 = 94%). Although this represents a potentially negative outcome, the improvement in clearance rates justifies the additional investment of time and effort. Conclusions: Displacement of lower pole kidney stones for subsequent lithotripsy brings significant benefits in terms of stone-free rate, with no difference in laser energy usage. However, it results in increased surgical time. Despite these factors, the benefits to patients undergoing the procedure are substantial.

Complementary Ureterorenoscopy after extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in proximal ureteral stones: success and complications.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the effect of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy application on the success and complications of ureteroscopic lithotripsy in proximal ureter stones. METHODS: The data of 87 patients who did not respond to shock wave lithotripsy and underwent ureteroscopic lithotripsy were retrospectively analyzed and classified as group I, and 99 patients who received ureteroscopic lithotripsy as primary treatment were classified as group II. Demographic features, response to treatment, and preoperative and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There was no difference between the two groups in terms of gender, operation times, stone sizes, and ureteroscope diameters. (p>0.05). Infective complications such as postoperative fever, pyelonephritis, and urosepsis were similar in both groups (p=0.142, p=0.291, and p=0.948). Stone migration was observed in 10 (11.5%) and 6 (6.1%) patients in groups I and II, respectively (p=0.291). Impacted stone was seen in 47 (54%) patients in group I and in 15 (15.2%) patients in group II (p<0.0001). Mucosal laceration occurred in 11 (12.6%) and 3 (3%) patients in groups I and II, respectively (p=0.028). Ureteral perforation was detected in 3 (3.4%) patients in group I and 1 (1%) patient in group II, whereas ureteral avulsion was not observed in either group (p=0.524). CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that the application of shock wave lithotripsy before ureteroscopic lithotripsy in proximal ureter stones did not affect the success. Although the results are similar in terms of postoperative infection, shock wave lithotripsy application has been found to increase the risk of stone impaction into the mucosa and ureteral laceration.

Efficacy of Adjuvant Tamsulosin for Improving the Stone-Free Rate after Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Renal Stones: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Introduction: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is an effective treatment for urolithiasis. Tamsulosin is capable of causing dilation and facilitating the migration of stones. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant treatment with tamsulosin for improving the stone-free rate after a single session of ESWL in the treatment of kidney stones. Methods: This is a randomized, nonplacebo-controlled study with a sample of 60 adults with a single radiopaque kidney stone of 5-20 mm in diameter. After the ESWL session, the patients were divided into two groups. The control group received standard treatment for analgesia consisting of oral diclofenac (75 mg/12 h) as needed. The tamsulosin group received standard treatment for analgesia plus oral tamsulosin (0.4 mg/day) for eight weeks. In both groups, stone-free status was determined using a CT scan eight weeks after ESWL. The protocol of this study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04819828. Results: Only 57 patients completed the study (28 tamsulosin and 29 control). Overall, the average stone diameter was 11.42 ± 4.52 mm. The stone-free rate was 50.88% (29 of 57) overall, 53.57% (15 of 28) for the tamsulosin group, and 48.27% (14 of 29) for the control group (p = 0.680). The estimated relative risk in favor of the tamsulosin group to achieve a stone-free status was 1.11 (95% CI 0.67-1.9). The estimated number needed to treat to achieve a single patient with renal stone-free status after eight weeks of ESWL adjuvant treatment with tamsulosin was 19. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that tamsulosin as adjuvant treatment after a single ESWL session is well tolerated and safe, but it does not increase the stone-free rate in patients with a single radiopaque renal stone of 5-20 mm in diameter. Our results may support the use of tamsulosin with ESWL in the case of patients with a single radiopaque renal stone of 11-20 mm in diameter based on an apparent higher stone-free rate and a low rate of complications.