Clinical significance of serum CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 in patients with lupus nephritis.

STUDY DESIGN: Lupus nephritis (LN) is an autoimmune disease as a complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). LN is typically diagnosed through a combination of clinical evaluation as index scoring, and kidney biopsy as a more accurate but invasive examination. In the current study, we assessed serological markers including IFN-γ-inducible chemokines C-X-C motif chemokine ligand (CXCL)9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 in diagnosing LN. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 160 SLE patients with and without LN. Fasting venous blood was collected from the study subjects for measuring serum levels of CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11. The assessment of clinical disease activity in SLE was conducted using the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI)-2000 scoring system. LN disease activity was conducted using the Austin scoring system. LN was further confirmed following kidney biopsy, and data were compared by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: SLE patients with LN showed longer SLE duration, enhanced SLEDAI scores, lower serum anti-ds-DNA antibody levels when compared to SLE patients without LN. Specifically, these patients had significantly higher serum levels of CXCL9, CXCL10 and CXCL11. CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 showed positive correlation with SLE disease activity in SLE patients with LN. ROC analysis of CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 showed substantial enhancement of sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of LN in the patients with SLE. CONCLUSIONS: Serum CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 levels may improve the sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of LN in SLE patients.

Circulating extracellular vesicles in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: physicochemical properties and phenotype.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify the physicochemical and phenotypic characteristics of circulating Extracellular Vesicles (EVs) in the plasma of patients with SLE, with or without Lupus Nephritis (LN), and their potential utility as disease biomarkers. METHODS: Plasma-circulating EVs were concentrated using differential centrifugation from adult female patients (n=38) who met the 'American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology 2019' criteria for SLE diagnosis with (LN) or without LN (nLN), confirmed by renal biopsy. Controls (n=18) were healthy volunteers matched by gender and similar age. The structure, size and Energy Dispersion Spectrum (EDS) of EVs were observed by electron microscopy. The surface charge and size distribution were evaluated using dynamic light scattering. The counts and phenotype of EVs from patients (SLE-EVs) and controls (Ctrl-EVs) were obtained using flow cytometry. Non-parametric statistical tests and exploratory analysis of multiple variables were performed. The discriminatory power of some variables as potential biomarkers of the disease was also evaluated. RESULTS: Circulating EVs were heterogeneous in morphology and size, but SLE-EVs reached larger diameters than Ctrl-EVs (p<0.0001). Small SLE-EVs and large SLE-EVs were increased compared with Ctrl-EV (p<0.0001 and p<0.05, respectively). Likewise, patients with SLE (LN or nLN) had higher concentrations of large EVs compared with controls (p<0.001 and p<0.0001, respectively). SLE-EVs showed a different EDS (p<0.001) and were less electronegative (p<0.0001) than Ctrl-EVs. EV-CD45+, EV-CD14+ and EV-IgM+ were more frequent in patients with SLE compared with controls (p<0.001, p<0.05 and p<0.001, respectively). The concentrations of large EVs and EV-IgM+ allowed better discrimination of patients from controls. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma-circulating EVs from patients with SLE with and without nephritis are increased in peripheral blood and have different physicochemical properties than controls. Characteristics of EVs such as larger size and the presence of IgM on the surface could help discriminate patients from controls.

Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells and Serum Cytokines in Patients with Lupus Nephritis after COVID-19.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients have an increased risk of infections and infection-related mortality. Therefore, during the global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, SLE patients were particularly vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infections. Also, compared to other patients, SLE patients seem to develop more severe manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), with higher rates of hospitalization, invasive ventilation requirements, or death. This study evaluated the immune parameters after SARS-CoV-2 infection in SLE patients. We analyzed subpopulations of peripheral blood cells collected from patients with renal manifestation of SLE (lupus nephritis, LN). LN patients were divided into two subgroups: those unexposed to SARS-CoV-2 (LN CoV-2(-)) and those who had confirmed COVID-19 (LN-CoV-2(+)) six months earlier. We analyzed basic subpopulations of T cells, B cells, monocytes, dendritic cells (DCs), and serum cytokines using flow cytometry. All collected data were compared to a healthy control group without SARS-CoV-2 infection in medical history. LN patients were characterized by a decreased percentage of helper T (Th) cells and an increased percentage of cytotoxic T (Tc) cells regardless of SARS-CoV-2 infection. LN CoV-2(+) patients had a higher percentage of regulatory T cells (Tregs) and plasmablasts (PBs) and a lower percentage of non-switched memory (NSM) B cells compared to LN CoV-2(-) patients or healthy controls (HC CoV-2(-)). LN patients had a higher percentage of total monocytes compared with HC CoV-2(-). LN CoV-2(+) patients had a higher percentage of classical and intermediate monocytes than LN CoV-2(-) patients and HC CoV-2(-). LN CoV-2(+) patients had higher serum IL-6 levels than HC CoV-2(-), while LN CoV-2(-) patients had higher levels of serum IL-10. LN patients are characterized by disturbances in the blood's basic immunological parameters. However, SARS-CoV-2 infection influences B-cell and monocyte compartments.

[Correlation of anti-C1q antibodies with active systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis in children]. / 抗C1qæŠ—ä½“ä¸Žå„¿ç«¥æ´»åŠ¨æ€§ç³»ç»Ÿæ€§çº¢æ–‘ç‹¼ç–®å’Œæ´»åŠ¨æ€§ç‹¼ç–®æ€§è‚¾ç‚Žçš„ç›¸å ³æ€§åˆ†æž.

OBJECTIVES: To study the correlation of anti-C1q antibodies with active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis (LN) in children, as well as their diagnostic value for active SLE and LN. METHODS: A retrospective selection of 90 hospitalized children with SLE at the Children's Medical Center of Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University from January 2016 to March 2019 as the SLE group, all of whom were tested for anti-C1q antibodies. A control group was formed by collecting 70 hospitalized children with other autoimmune diseases (OAD) during the same period. The differences in anti-C1q antibody levels were compared between two groups.The correlation of anti-C1q antibodies with various indicators of SLE and LN was analyzed, and the diagnostic value of anti-C1q in SLE and LN was evaluated. RESULTS: The serum levels of anti-C1q antibodies in the SLE group were higher than those in the OAD group (P<0.05). The SLE disease activity index score was positively correlated with anti-C1q antibodies (rs=0.371, P<0.001) and positively correlated with anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies (rs=0.370, P<0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of anti-C1q antibodies for diagnosing active SLE were 89.90% and 53.90%, respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.720 (P<0.05) and a critical value of 5.45 U/mL. The sensitivity and specificity of anti-C1q antibody levels for diagnosing active LN were 58.50% and 85.00%, respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.675 (P<0.05) and a critical value of 22.05 U/mL. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-C1q antibodies can serve as non-invasive biomarkers for evaluating the activity of SLE or predicting the activity of LN in children.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in systemic lupus erythematosus.

The wide range of clinical and serological manifestations in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and the lack of accepted diagnostic criteria warrant the identification of novel, more accurate biomarkers. Hematological indices derived from full blood cell counts, particularly the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), have shown promise in SLE; however, a critical appraisal of their diagnostic accuracy is lacking. We sought to address this issue by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of the NLR and PLR in SLE. The electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched from inception to 15 March 2024 for studies reporting the sensitivity and specificity of the NLR and PLR, obtained by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, for the presence of SLE, disease severity, organ involvement (lupus nephritis, pericarditis, and pleural disease), and complications (infections). The risk of bias was assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024531446). The NLR exhibited good accuracy for the diagnosis of SLE (eight studies; area under the curve, AUC = 0.81, 95% CI 0.78-0.85) and lupus nephritis (nine studies; AUC = 0.81, 95% CI 0.77-0.84), but not for severe disease (nine studies; AUC = 0.69, 95% CI 0.65-0.73) or infections (six studies; AUC = 0.73, 95% CI 0.69-0.77). The PLR exhibited good accuracy for the diagnosis of severe disease (six studies; AUC = 0.85, 95% CI 0.81-0.87). There were an insufficient number of studies to assess the accuracy of the PLR for the diagnosis of SLE, lupus nephritis, or infections. No study investigated the NLR and PLR in SLE patients with pericarditis or pleural disease. Therefore, the NLR and the PLR have a relatively high diagnostic accuracy for the presence of SLE and lupus nephritis (NLR) and severe disease (PLR). Further studies are warranted to determine whether the NLR and PLR, in combination with clinical evaluation and other serological biomarkers, can enhance the diagnosis and management of SLE.

The Expression of Toll-like Receptors (TLR7 and TLR9) in Class III and Class IV of Recently Diagnosed Lupus Nephritis with 12-Month Follow-Up.

Renal involvement is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The present study included patients with recently diagnosed Class III and Class IV lupus nephritis (LN) treated by Rheumatology who, upon the detection of alterations in their kidney function, were referred to Nephrology for the joint management of both medical specialties. The purpose of this study was to compare the plasma expression of Toll-Like Receptor 7 (TLR7) and TLR9 in healthy control (HC) subjects and newly diagnosed Class III and Class IV LN patients with 12-month follow-ups. The plasma expression of TLR7 and TLR9 proteins was determined by the ELISA method. A significant increase in the expression of TLR7 protein was found in Class III LN in the basal determination compared to the expression in the HC (p = 0.002) and at 12 months of follow-up (p = 0.03) vs. HC. The expression of TLR9 showed a behavior opposite to that of TLR7. TLR9 showed decreased protein expression in LN Class III patients' baseline and final measurements. The result was similar in the basal and final determinations of LN Class IV compared to the expression in HC. A significant decrease in SLEDAI -2K was observed at 12 months of follow-up in patients in Class III (p = 0.01) and Class IV (p = 0.0001) of LN. Complement C3 levels improved significantly at 12-month follow-up in Class IV patients (p = 0.0001). Complement C4 levels decreased significantly at 12-month follow-up in LN Class III compared to baseline (p = 0.01). Anti-DNA antibodies decreased significantly at 12 months of follow-up in Class IV LN (p = 0.01). A significant increase in proteinuria was found at 12 months of follow-up in Class III LN, compared to the baseline determination (p = 0.02). In LN Class IV, proteinuria decreased at 12 months of follow-up compared to baseline (p = 0.0001). Albuminuria decreased at 12 months of follow-up in LN Class IV (p = 0.006). Class IV LN, albuminuria also decreased at 12 months of follow-up (p = 0.009). Hematuria persisted in all patients and the glomerular filtration rate did not change. Three Class IV patients died before 12 months of follow-up from various causes. In conclusion, although the rheumatologic data appeared to improve, the renal function data remained inconsistent. Decreased expression of TLR9 and increased expression of TLR7 could be useful in the early diagnosis of Class III and Class IV LN is correct.

Anti-C1q antibodies: a biomarker for diagnosis and management of lupus nephritis. A narrative review.

Nephritis is a frequent and severe complication of Systemic Lupus Erythematous (SLE). The clinical course of lupus nephritis (LN) is usually characterized by alternating phases of remission and exacerbation. Flares of LN can lead to deterioration of kidney function, necessitating timely diagnosis and therapy. The presence of autoantibodies against C1q (anti-C1qAb) in the sera of SLE patients has been reported in various studies. Some research suggests that the presence and changes in the titer of anti-C1qAb may be associated with the development of LN, as well as with LN activity and renal flares. However, the exact role of anti-C1qAb in LN remains a subject of debate. Despite variability in the results of published studies, anti-C1qAb hold promise as noninvasive markers for assessing LN activity in SLE patients. Measuring anti-C1qAb levels could aid in diagnosing and managing LN during periods of both inactive disease and renal flares. Nevertheless, larger controlled trials with standardized laboratory assays are necessary to further establish the utility of anti-C1qAb in predicting the reactivation and remission of LN and guiding treatment strategies.

Anti-dsDNA IgE: a potential non-invasive test for prediction of lupus nephritis relapse.

OBJECTIVES: Discontinuation or continuation of maintenance immunosuppressive therapy (MIST) after a severe lupus nephritis (LN) requires measuring the risk of relapse but reliable clinical and biological markers are lacking. The WIN-IgE study assesses the value of serum anti-dsDNA IgE autoantibodies as a biomarker for the prediction of relapse in severe LN. METHODS: WIN-IgE is an ancillary study of the WIN-Lupus study (NCT01284725), a prospective controlled clinical trial which evaluated the discontinuation of MIST after 2-3 years in class III or IV±V LN with active lesions. WIN-IgE included all patients with available serum collected at randomisation for continuation or discontinuation of MIST. In these sera, anti-dsDNA antibodies, IgE and IgG, were quantified by ELISA and compared between patients who experienced LN relapse and those who did not during the 24 months of follow-up. RESULTS: 52 patients were included, 25 in the MIST continuation group and 27 in the MIST discontinuation group, 12 experienced a biopsy-proven relapse of LN. Initial anti-dsDNA IgE antibodies levels were higher in patients with subsequent LN relapse. Anti-dsDNA IgG was not associated with relapse. Survival without LN relapse was lower in patients with anti-dsDNA IgE levels above vs below a threshold of 1.9 arbitrary units (p=0.019), particularly in the subgroup of patients randomised to discontinue MIST (p=0.002). In all patients, anti-dsDNA IgE above 1.9 arbitrary units had a positive predictive value of 0.8 for severe LN relapse. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest blood anti-dsDNA IgE as a non-invasive predictive marker of LN relapse.

[NETosis in lupus nephritis].

AIM: To evaluate the levels of MPO-DNA complex in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and its association with the presence of lupus nephritis (LN). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 77 patients with SLE, of whom 30 had SLE without anti phospholipid syndrome (APS), 47 had SLE with APS, and 20 were healthy individuals serving as the control group. The MPO-DNA complex in the serum was investigated using ELISA. RESULTS: The levels of MPO-DNA complex in serum were significantly higher in patients with SLE compared to healthy controls (p=0.001). Among the patients with SLE, 30 (39%) had elevated levels of MPO-DNA complex. The presence of elevated MPO-DNA complex was significantly associated with the presence of a history of LN (p=0.009). Moreover, among the patients included in the study, 20 had active LN, and patients with elevated MPO-DNA complex levels were more likely to have active LN than patients without elevated MPO-DNA complex concentrations [12 (40%) of 30 vs 8 (17%) of 47, χ2=5.029; p=0.034]. An association was found between elevated levels of MPO-DNA complex and the presence of proteinuria, hematuria, cellular hematic/granular casts and aseptic leukocyturia. A direct correlation of MPO-DNA complex with SLEDAI-R was found in patients with active LN (rs=0.497; p=0.026). CONCLUSION: Elevated levels of MPO-DNA complex were detected in 39% of patients with SLE. These patients had a higher prevalence of LN in their medical history and at the time of inclusion in the study. The correlation between MPO-DNA complex levels and the activity of LN according to SLEDAI-R indicates the potential role of MPO-DNA complex as a biomarker for assessing the activity of renal damage in SLE.

Serum antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody positivity at the time of renal biopsy is associated with disease activity of lupus nephritis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the correlations between serum antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) and clinicopathological features, induction treatment response, and prognosis of lupus nephritis (LN) patients. METHODS: In this retrospective study, biopsy-proven LN patients from October 2010 to September 2020 were tested for serum ANCA by indirect immunofluorescence and ELISA and were divided into ANCA-positive group and ANCA-negative group. The clinicopathological data of the two groups were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: Thirty-five of 115 patients (30.43%) were seropositive for ANCA. ANCA-positive patients had significantly higher systemic lupus erythematosus activity index and activity index scores, higher 24-h urinary protein, and lower complement three levels (p = 0.001, 0.028, 0.023, 0.009, respectively). The incidences of oral ulcers, thrombocytopenia, and leukocyturia, and the positive rates of anti-dsDNA antibody and anti-histone antibody were significantly higher in ANCA-positive group (p = 0.006, 0.019, 0.012, 0.001, 0.019, respectively). Class IV LN and fibrinoid necrosis/karyorrhexis were significantly more common in the ANCA-positive group (p = 0.027, 0.002). There was no significant difference in the total remission rate of ANCA-positive patients receiving cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil as induction therapies (83.33% vs. 66.67%, p > 0.05), while patients receiving cyclophosphamide as induction therapy had a higher total remission rate than those receiving other immunosuppressants (83.33% vs. 20%, p = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: LN patients with ANCA seropositivity at renal biopsy have a significantly higher disease activity, and their pathological manifestations are predominantly proliferative LN. These patients require a more active immunosuppressive therapy with cyclophosphamide or mycophenolate mofetil to improve their remission rate.

Tubular biomarkers and histology in lupus nephritis.

INTRODUCTION: The relevance of tubulo-interstitial involvement for kidney prognosis has recently been emphasized, but validated biomarkers for predicting histology are still lacking. The aim of our study was to evaluate different serum and urinary markers of tubular damage in patients with lupus nephritis (LN) and to correlate them with kidney histopathology. METHODS: A single-center retrospective study was conducted from January 2016 to December 2021. Serum and urine samples were collected on the same day of kidney biopsy and correlated with histologic data from a cohort of 15 LN patients. We analyzed the following urinary markers, adjusted for urine creatinine: beta 2-microglobulin, alpha 1-microglobulin, NGAL, uKIM-1, MCP-1, uDKK-3, and uUMOD. The serum markers sKIM-1 and sUMOD were also analyzed. RESULTS: A positive and strong correlation was observed between the degree of interstitial fibrosis (rho = 0.785, p = .001) and tubular atrophy (rho = 0.781, p = .001) and the levels of uDKK3. uUMOD also showed an inverse and moderate correlation with interstitial fibrosis (rho = -0.562, p = .037) and tubular atrophy (rho = -0.694, p = .006). Patients with >10% cortical interstitial inflammation had higher levels of uKIM-1 [4.9 (3.9, 5.5) vs. 0.8 (0.6, 1.5) mcg/mg, p = .001], MCP-1 [3.8 (2. 3, 4.2) vs. 0.7 (0.3, 1.2) mcg/mg, p = .001], sKIM-1 [9.2 (5.9, 32.7) vs. 1.4 (0, 3.5) pg/mL, p = .001], and lower sUMOD [8.7 (0, 39.7) vs. 46.1 (35.7, 53) ng/mL, p = .028]. CONCLUSION: The use of specific urinary and serum biomarkers of tubular dysfunction or injury may help to predict certain histologic parameters in LN patients.

Growth arrest-specific protein 6 as a marker of nephritis in systemic sclerosis and juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus patients.

Background: Renal impairments commonly occur as a complication of autoimmune connective tissue diseases (CTDs). Therefore, early nephritis prediction is vital for patient outcomes. Growth Arrest-Specific Protein 6 (GAS6) was found to be upregulated in many types of inflammatory renal disease, including diabetic nephropathy.Aim: To evaluate GAS6 as a predictor of renal impairment in adults with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and children with systemic lupus Erythematosus (SLE).Methods: The study included 60 patients with SSc and 40 children with SLE. The serum level of GAS6 was measured using the ELISA technique. In adults with SSc, total proteins in 24-h urine concentration of >300 mg/24 h indicated renal inflammation, while in children with SLE, nephritis was diagnosed by abnormal renal pathology.Results: In SSc patients, GAS6 significantly increased in patients with proteinuria. GAS6 is an independent predictor of nephritis with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.06 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.0-1.1. at cutoff 12.2 ng/mL GAS6 predicted proteinuria with sensitivity 86.7% (95% CI: 59.5% to 98.3%), specificity 57.8% (95% CI: 42.1% to 72.3%), positive predictive value 40.6% (95% CI: 31.5% to 50.4%), negative predictive value 92.9% (95% CI: 77.7% to 97.73%), and accuracy 65.0% (95% CI: 51.6% to 76.9%). In SLE patients, Serum GAS6 did not differ significantly between children with and without lupus nephritis.Conclusion: GAS6 is an independent predictor of nephritis in patients with SSc. However, there is no association between GAS6 and nephritis in juvenile patients with SLE.

Development of clinical and laboratory biomarkers in an international cohort of 428 children with lupus nephritis.

BACKGROUND: Lupus nephritis (LN) is a very severe manifestation of lupus. There is no consensus on which treatment goals should be achieved to protect kidney function in children with LN. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed trends of commonly used laboratory biomarkers of 428 patients (≤ 18 years old) with biopsy-proven LN class ≥ III. We compared data of patients who developed stable kidney remission from 6 to 24 months with those who did not. RESULTS: Twenty-five percent of patients maintained kidney stable remission while 75% did not. More patients with stable kidney remission showed normal hemoglobin and erythrocyte sedimentation rate from 6 to 24 months compared to the group without stable kidney remission. eGFR ≥ 90 ml/min/1.73m2 at onset predicted the development of stable kidney remission (93.8%) compared to 64.7% in those without stable remission (P < 0.00001). At diagnosis, 5.9% and 20.2% of the patients showed no proteinuria in the group with and without stable kidney remission, respectively (P = 0.0001). dsDNA antibodies decreased from onset of treatment mainly during the first 3 months in all groups, but more than 50% of all patients in both groups never normalized after 6 months. Complement C3 and C4 increased mainly in the first 3 months in all patients without any significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: Normal eGFR and the absence of proteinuria at onset were predictors of stable kidney remission. Significantly more children showed normal levels of Hb and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) from 6 to 24 months in the group with stable kidney remission.

Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as a biomarker of systemic inflammation in systemic lupus erythematosus: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Additionally, the study aimed to establish an association between PLR and SLE disease activity, specifically lupus nephritis (LN). METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search across Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify relevant articles. Subsequently, we performed meta-analyses to compare PLR between SLE patients and controls, as well as active and inactive SLE cases, along with LN and non-LN groups. Furthermore, a meta-analysis was conducted on correlation coefficients between PLR and various parameters in SLE patients, including the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), C3, C4, anti-dsDNA, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP). RESULTS: In total, fifteen studies comprising 1,522 SLE patients and 1,424 controls were eligible for inclusion. The meta-analysis demonstrated a significant elevation of PLR in the SLE group compared to the control group (Standardized Mean Difference [SMD] = 0.604, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] = 0.299-0.909, p < 0.001). Upon stratification by ethnicity, an elevated PLR was observed in the SLE group among both Asian and Arab populations. Subgroup analysis based on sample size revealed consistently higher PLR in both small (n < 200) and large sample (n ≥ 200) SLE groups. Moreover, when considering disease activity, there was a noteworthy trend of increased PLR in the active disease group compared to the inactive group (SMD = 0.553, 95% CI = 0.000-1.106, p = 0.050). However, the meta-analysis did not demonstrate a significant distinction in PLR between the LN and non-LN groups. Notably, a positive association was established between PLR and SLEDAI (correlation coefficient = 0.325, 95% CI = 0.176-0.459, p < 0.001). Furthermore, PLR exhibited positive correlations with ESR, CRP, proteinuria, C3, and anti-dsDNA antibody levels. CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes of this meta-analysis underscored the elevated PLR in SLE patients, suggesting its potential as a biomarker for gauging systemic inflammation in SLE. Additionally, PLR exhibited correlations with SLEDAI, as well as with key indicators such as ESR, CRP, proteinuria, C3, and anti-dsDNA antibody levels.

Serum Uric Acid Combined with Homocysteine as a Predictive Biomarker of Lupus Nephritis.

Serum uric acid (UA) and homocysteine (Hcy) are potential biomarkers of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). In this study, the expressions of UA and Hcy in SLE patients and the predictive value of these two parameters for lupus nephritis (LN) were studied. A total of 476 SLE patients were recruited to this case-control study, of which 176 SLE patients diagnosed with LN and 300 without LN. Serum UA and Hcy levels were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between serum UA and Hcy and LN. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to predict the role of combination of serum UA and Hcy in LN. We found that serum UA and Hcy levels in SLE patients with LN were significantly higher than those in controls (p<0.05). Multivariate logistic regressions showed that serum UA (OR+=+1.003, 95+% CI: 1.001-1.006, p+=+0.003), apolipoprotein B (Apo B) (OR+=+21.361, 95+% CI: 2.312-195.373, p+=+0.007) and Hcy (OR+=+1.042, 95+% CI: 1.011-1.080, p+=+0.014) were independent markers of LN. Combined serum UA and Hcy revealed a better result (AUC+=+0.718, 95+% CI: 0.670-0.676, p<0.001) in prediction of LN compared to that of the serum UA (AUC+=+0.710) and Hcy (AUC+=+0.657) independently. In conclusion, serum UA and Hcy could be predictive biomarkers of LN, and joint detection of serum UA and Hcy might be useful in the clinical setting.

Efficacy and safety of telitacicept in patients with lupus nephritis: a single-center, real-world retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Telitacicept, an innovative drug used for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), can effectively control disease progression and achieve favorable outcomes. While case reports have mentioned the use of Telitacicept in lupus nephritis (LN) treatment, its safety and efficacy in treating patients with LN have not been explored. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Telitacicept in managing patients with LN. METHODS: In a single-center, real-world retrospective study, 30 LN patients with poor response or adverse reactions to conventional glucocorticoids at our Hospital were enrolled to receive Telitacicept. Patients were administered 160 mg of Telitacicept subcutaneously once a week for at least 24 weeks in addition to standard treatment. We assessed the SLE responder index-4 (SRI-4) at the beginning and the end of the treatment period, measured laboratory test indicators at 3, 6, and 9 months, and observed the occurrence of adverse events in these patients. RESULTS: The SRI-4 response rate was 86.67% (n = 26), with a significantly lower systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index (SLEDAI) score compared to the baseline. Post Telitacicept treatment, glucocorticoid intake of patients with LN significantly reduced from 50 (IQR:40, 51.25) at baseline to 10 (IQR:5,10) at the endpoint (Z = - 6.547, p < 0.001). Patients with LN showed significantly improved urine occult blood levels after Telitacicept therapy. While the complement (C3 and C4) contents increased, immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA and IgM) reduced markedly (p < 0.001). The negative rate of dsDNA reached 26.67% and adverse events were alleviated post treatment. Only two cases of LN-related adverse reactions were reported, including herpes and infectious fever, respectively. Telitacicept primarily serves as an agent for the induction of remission therapy, with an attainment of complete remission rate standing at a commendable 73.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Telitacicept treatment reduced disease severity in patients with LN. The initial clinical trial provided supportive evidence for the effectiveness and safety of Telitacicept as a viable treatment option for LN, allowing a reduction in the daily glucocorticoid intake while maintaining a good safety profile, and improving hypocomplementation in LN management.

Long noncoding RNAs (CTC-471J1.2, NeST) as epigenetic risk factors of active juvenile lupus nephritis: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Measurement of the circulating levels of long-non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in lupus nephritis (LN) patients could dramatically explore more insights about the disease pathogenesis. Hence, we aimed to quantify the level of expression of CTC-471J1.2 and NeST in LN patients and to correlate it with the disease activity. METHOD: This case-control study was conducted on a group of children with juvenile LN attending to Mansoura University Children's Hospital (MUCH). Demographics, clinical, and laboratory findings were collected besides the measurement of lncRNAs by quantitative real-time PCR. RESULTS: The expression level of lncRNAs-CTC-471J1.2 was significantly down-regulated in children with active LN versus inactive cases or controls. In contrast, the NeST was significantly up-regulated in active LN cases. A significant correlation was found between CTC-471J1.2 expression and LN activity parameters. Additionally, both lncRNAs showed a reasonable sensitivity and specificity in differentiation of active LN. A regression analysis model revealed that CTC-471J1.2 and NeST were independent predictors of active nephritis. CONCLUSION: The expression level of circulatory lncRNAs-CTC-471J1.2 and NeST can be used as sensitive and specific biomarkers for active LN. Furthermore, both could serve as predictors for nephritis activity.

Predictive modeling of co-infection in lupus nephritis using multiple machine learning algorithms.

This study aimed to analyze peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets in lupus nephritis (LN) patients and use machine learning (ML) methods to establish an effective algorithm for predicting co-infection in LN. This study included 111 non-infected LN patients, 72 infected LN patients, and 206 healthy controls (HCs). Patient information, infection characteristics, medication, and laboratory indexes were recorded. Eight ML methods were compared to establish a model through a training group and verify the results in a test group. We trained the ML models, including Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, K-Nearest Neighbors, Support Vector Machine, Multi-Layer Perceptron, Random Forest, Ada boost, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), and further evaluated potential predictors of infection. Infected LN patients had significantly decreased levels of T, B, helper T, suppressor T, and natural killer cells compared to non-infected LN patients and HCs. The number of regulatory T cells (Tregs) in LN patients was significantly lower than in HCs, with infected patients having the lowest Tregs count. Among the ML algorithms, XGB demonstrated the highest accuracy and precision for predicting LN infections. The innate and adaptive immune systems are disrupted in LN patients, and monitoring lymphocyte subsets can help prevent and treat infections. The XGB algorithm was recommended for predicting co-infection in LN.

Assessment of Interleukin 17 in Egyptian Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients as a Biomarker in Disease Activity.

INTRODUCTION: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic idiopathic systemic autoimmune disorder with dysregulation of adaptive and innate immune systems. Interleukin (IL)-17 is the prototypical pro-inflammatory cytokine of T helper 17 (Th17) cells. Therefore, it contributes to the pathogenesis of human SLE. AIM: The aim of the research paper was the evaluation of IL-17 level as a biomarker in the SLE cohort and its relation to disease activity and analysis of IL-17 concentration in patients with lupus nephritis and non-lupus nephritis. METHODS: The research enrolled 45 SLE patients according to Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Classification Criteria (SLICC), and age and sex-matched. The patients underwent full history, clinical examination, laboratory investigation, and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) calculation. RESULTS: The mean age ± SD of the participants equaled 32 ± 11 years, and serum IL-17 in SLE cases was statistically significantly high (p < 0.001). No statistically significant correlations were reported between disease activity according to SLEDAI and IL-17. In addition, a statistically significant positive correlation was reported between IL-17 and ESR, and a high statistically significant negative correlation was reported between IL-17 and C3 and C4 (P < 0.001). A statistically significant positive correlation was reported between IL-17 and 24-hour urinary proteins with a Pvalue of 0.01. CONCLUSION: SLE cases demonstrated higher levels of serum IL-17, contributing to SLE pathogenesis. However, no statistically significant difference was reported between IL-17 and Lupus nephritis. IL-17 and SLE activity (SLEDAI) did not correlate. A statistically significant positive relation was reported between IL-17 and 24-hour urinary proteins. Additionally, a high statistically significant negative correlation was reported between IL-17 and C3 and C4.