Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 6.627
Filter
1.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1423736, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38952729

ABSTRACT

The continuation of high-quality care is under threat for the over 70 million children in the United States. Inequities between Medicaid and Medicare payments and the current procedural-based reimbursement model have resulted in the undervaluing of pediatric medical care and lack of prioritization of children's health by institutions. The number of pediatricians, including pediatric subspecialists, and pediatric healthcare centers are declining due to mounting financial obstacles and this crucial healthcare supply is no longer able to keep up with demand. The reasons contributing to these inequities are clear and rational: Medicaid has significantly lower rates of reimbursement compared to Medicare, yet Medicaid covers almost half of children in the United States and creates the natural incentive for medical institutions to prioritize the care of adults. Additionally, certain aspects of children's healthcare are unique from adults and are not adequately covered in the current payment model. The result of decades of devaluing children's healthcare has led to a substantial decrease in the availability of services, medications, and equipment needed to provide healthcare to children across the nation. Fortunately, the solution is just as clear as the problem: we must value the healthcare of children as much as that of adults by increasing Medicaid funding to be on par with Medicare and appreciate the complexities of care beyond procedures. If these changes are not made, the high-quality care for children in the US will continue to decline and increase strain on the overall healthcare system as these children age into adulthood.


Subject(s)
Medicaid , Medicare , Humans , United States , Medicaid/economics , Medicare/economics , Child , Quality of Health Care , Child Health Services , Healthcare Disparities , Health Services Accessibility
3.
Inquiry ; 61: 469580241258653, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38910529

ABSTRACT

Several states are considering competitive procurement to help shape Medicaid managed care markets. In New York state, the focus of our study, regulators propose contracts that reward quality improvement and simplify state administration by rewarding plans that operate across several of the state's 62 counties. This case analysis uses novel regulatory data from New York state, obtained via public records request, to examine incentives underlying Medicaid markets and help inform contracting design. The data report plan enrollment by county and plan spending across administrative activities for all 16 Medicaid plans in New York state for 2018. We examine the counties in which plans operate, profitability, and administrative resource allocation. We compare outcomes by tertile of plan profitability, measured as net income per member-month. Plan profitability ranged widely, with the most profitable plan realizing nearly $30 per member-month while the least profitable 5 plans realized net negative earnings. Operational differences across plan profitability emerged most clearly in administrative spending. The most profitable plans reported greater spending on salaries overall and for executive management, and taxes, while the least profitable plans spent more on operational functions including utilization management/ quality improvement, claims processing, and informational systems. We observe modest differences in county rurality and little in geographic breadth. Procurement design that rewards capacity-building in key administrative functions might impact market evolution, given that on average, highly profitable firms spent less on these activities in New York's Medicaid managed care market in 2018.


Subject(s)
Managed Care Programs , Medicaid , Managed Care Programs/economics , Managed Care Programs/organization & administration , New York , Medicaid/economics , United States , Humans , Motivation
4.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 43(7): 910-921, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38865652

ABSTRACT

Health care spending growth is expected to outpace that of the gross domestic product (GDP) during the coming decade, resulting in a health share of GDP that reaches 19.7 percent by 2032 (up from 17.3 percent in 2022). National health expenditures are projected to have grown 7.5 percent in 2023, when the COVID-19 public health emergency ended. This reflects broad increases in the use of health care, which is associated with an estimated 93.1 percent of the population being insured that year. In 2024, Medicaid enrollment is projected to decline significantly as states continue their eligibility redeterminations. Simultaneously, private health insurance enrollment is projected to increase because of the extension of enhanced subsidies for direct-purchase health insurance under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of 2022, as well as a temporary special enrollment period for qualified people losing Medicaid coverage (after eligibility redeterminations). Over the course of 2024-26, the IRA expands Medicare's drug benefit generosity and implements drug price negotiations for beneficiaries; concurrently, the extended enhanced subsidies for direct-purchase health insurance expire in 2026. During 2027-32, personal health care price inflation and growth in the use of health care services and goods contribute to projected health spending that grows at a faster rate than the rest of the economy.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Health Expenditures , Medicaid , Medicare , Humans , Health Expenditures/trends , United States , Medicaid/economics , Medicare/economics , Pandemics , Insurance, Health/economics , SARS-CoV-2 , Health Policy , Forecasting
5.
PLoS One ; 19(6): e0306047, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38917201

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Self-harm presents an important public health challenge. It imposes a notable burden on the utilization of emergency department (ED) services and medical expenses from patients and family. The Medicaid system is vital in providing financial support for individuals who struggle with medical expenses. This study explored the association of Medicaid coverage with ED visits following incidents of self-harm, utilizing nationwide ED surveillance data in Korea. METHODS: Data of all patients older than 14 years who presented to EDs following incidents of self-harm irrespective of intention to end their life, including cases of self-poisoning, were gathered from the National ED Information System (NEDIS). The annual self-harm visit rate (SHVR) per 100,000 people was calculated for each province and a generalized linear model analysis was conducted, with SHVR as a dependent variable and factors related to Medicaid coverage as independent variables. RESULTS: A 1% increase in Medicaid enrollment rate was linked to a significant decrease of 14% in SHVR. Each additional 1,000 Korean Won of Medicaid spending per enrollee was correlated with a 1% reduction in SHVR. However, an increase in Medicaid visits per enrollee and an extension of Medicaid coverage days were associated with an increase in SHVR. SHVR exhibited a stronger associated with parameters of Medicaid coverage in adolescents and young adults than in older adult population. CONCLUSION: Expansion of Medicaid coverage coupled with careful monitoring of shifts in Medicaid utilization patterns can mitigate ED overloading by reducing visits related to self-harm.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital , Medicaid , Registries , Self-Injurious Behavior , Humans , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Medicaid/economics , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Service, Hospital/economics , Female , Male , Self-Injurious Behavior/epidemiology , Self-Injurious Behavior/economics , Adult , Middle Aged , United States , Adolescent , Young Adult , Aged , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data
7.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 30(6): 549-559, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38824623

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder require long-term antipsychotic treatment with antipsychotic medications, but poor medication adherence can lead to increased health care utilization and costs. Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) offer potential therapeutic advantages in that they require less frequent dosing and improved medication adherence. South Carolina has the highest adoption of LAIs among US states, making it an ideal population for comparing the effectiveness of LAIs vs oral antipsychotics (OAPs) in treating schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of LAIs compared with OAPs on medication adherence, health care resource utilization, and costs among South Carolina Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. METHODS: South Carolina Medicaid beneficiaries with at least 1 claim for an LAI or OAP between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2018, aged 18 to 65, with at least 2 claims with diagnoses of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were included. Propensity scores (PSs) were calculated using logistic regression adjusting for confounders and predictors of the outcome. We estimated the "average treatment effect on the treated" by employing PS-weighted t-tests and chi-square tests. RESULTS: A total of 3,531 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 1,537 (44.5%) treated with LAIs and 1,994 (56.5%) treated with OAPs. In PS-weighted analyses, the LAI cohort had a greater proportion of days covered than the OAP cohort with a 365-day fixed denominator (69% vs 64%; P < 0.0001), higher medication possession ratio with a variable denominator while on therapy (85% vs 80%; P < 0.0001), and higher persistence (82% vs 64%; P < 0.0001). The average number of inpatient visits and emergency department visits did not significantly differ between cohorts (0.28 hospitalizations, P = 0.90; 3.68 vs 2.96 emergency department visits, P = 0.19). The number of outpatient visits, including visits for medication administration, were greater in the LAI cohort (23.1 [SD 24.2]) vs OAP (16.9 [SD 21.2]; P < 0.0001); however, including the costs for medication administration visits, outpatient costs (per member) were approximately $2,500 lower in the LAI cohort (P < 0.0001). The number of pharmacy visits was greater in the OAP cohort (LAI 21.0 [SD 17.0] vs OAP 23.0 [SD 15.0]; P = 0.006). All-cause total costs were greater in the LAI cohort ($26,025 [SD $29,909]) vs the OAP cohort ($17,291 [SD $25,261]; P < 0.0001) and were driven by the difference in pharmaceutical costs (LAI $15,273 [SD $16,183] vs OAP $4,696 [SD $10,371]; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Among South Carolina Medicaid beneficiaries, treatment with LAIs for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder was associated with greater medication adherence rates. Patients using LAIs had higher drug costs and total costs, but lower outpatient and total nondrug costs compared with those using OAPs.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Delayed-Action Preparations , Medicaid , Medication Adherence , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Schizophrenia , Humans , Antipsychotic Agents/economics , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Medicaid/economics , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Schizophrenia/economics , Male , Female , Adult , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , United States , Middle Aged , South Carolina , Administration, Oral , Young Adult , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Injections , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Psychotic Disorders/economics
8.
Ann Hepatol ; 29(4): 101509, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38710472

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) with nucelos(t)ide analogues (NA) can improve outcomes, but NA treatment is expensive for insurance plans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services database was assessed from 2012 to 2021 to assess the use of NA for CHB in patients on Medicaid. Data extracted included the number of claims, units, and costs of each agent stratified by originator and generic. RESULTS: Over the study period, 1.9 billion USD was spent on NA, with spending peaking in 2016 at $289 million US, which has subsequently decreased. Lower expenditures since 2016 have been associated with increased use of generics. The use of generic tenofovir or entecavir led to savings of $669 million US over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Increased generic use has significantly reduced expenditures for NA drugs; policy shifts towards generic drug use may help with sustainability.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents , Drug Costs , Drugs, Generic , Health Expenditures , Hepatitis B, Chronic , Medicaid , Humans , United States , Medicaid/economics , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/economics , Hepatitis B, Chronic/drug therapy , Hepatitis B, Chronic/economics , Drugs, Generic/economics , Drugs, Generic/therapeutic use , Nucleosides/therapeutic use , Nucleosides/economics , Tenofovir/therapeutic use , Tenofovir/economics , Guanine/analogs & derivatives , Guanine/therapeutic use , Guanine/economics
9.
Int J Drug Policy ; 128: 104449, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38733650

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Opioid use disorder (OUD) imposes significant costs on state and local governments. Medicaid expansion may lead to a reduction in the cost burden of OUD to the state. METHODS: We estimated the health care, criminal justice and child welfare costs, and tax revenue losses, attributable to OUD and borne by the state of North Carolina in 2022, and then estimated changes in the same domains following Medicaid expansion in North Carolina (adopted in December 2023). Analyses used existing literature on the national and state-level costs attributable to OUD to estimate individual-level health care, criminal justice, and child welfare system costs, and lost tax revenues. We combined Individual-level costs and prevalence estimates to estimate costs borne by the state before Medicaid expansion. Changes in costs after expansion were computed based on a) medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) access for new enrollees and b) shifting of responsibility for some health care costs from the state to the federal government. Monte Carlo simulation accounted for the impact of parameter uncertainty. Dollar estimates are from the 2022 price year, and costs following the first year were discounted at 3 %. RESULTS: In 2022, North Carolina incurred costs of $749 million (95 % credible interval [CI]: $305 M-$1,526 M) associated with OUD (53 % in health care, 36 % in criminal justice, 7 % in lost tax revenue, and 4 % in child welfare costs). Expanding Medicaid lowered the cost burden of OUD incurred by the state. The state was predicted to save an estimated $72 million per year (95 % CI: $6 M-$241 M) for the first two years and $30 million per year (95 % CI: -$28 M-$176 M) in subsequent years. Over five years, savings totaled $224 million (95 % CI: -$47 M-$949 M). CONCLUSION: Medicaid expansion has the potential to decrease the burden of OUD in North Carolina, and policymakers should expedite its implementation.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Health Care Costs , Medicaid , Opioid-Related Disorders , Humans , North Carolina/epidemiology , Medicaid/economics , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Opioid-Related Disorders/economics , Opioid-Related Disorders/epidemiology , United States , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Criminal Law/economics , Female , Male , Taxes/economics
11.
BMJ Open ; 14(5): e078592, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38692729

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Opioid overdoses in the USA have increased to unprecedented levels. Administration of the opioid antagonist naloxone can prevent overdoses. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to reveal the pharmacoepidemiologic patterns in naloxone prescribing to Medicaid patients from 2018 to 2021 as well as Medicare in 2019. DESIGN: Observational pharmacoepidemiologic study SETTING: US Medicare and Medicaid naloxone claims INTERVENTION: The Medicaid State Drug Utilisation Data File was utilised to extract information on the number of prescriptions and the amount prescribed of naloxone at a national and state level. The Medicare Provider Utilisation and Payment was also utilised to analyse prescription data from 2019. OUTCOME MEASURES: States with naloxone prescription rates that were outliers of quartile analysis were noted. RESULTS: The number of generic naloxone prescriptions per 100 000 Medicaid enrollees decreased by 5.3%, whereas brand naloxone prescriptions increased by 245.1% from 2018 to 2021. There was a 33.1-fold difference in prescriptions between the highest (New Mexico=1809.5) and lowest (South Dakota=54.6) states in 2019. Medicare saw a 30.4-fold difference in prescriptions between the highest (New Mexico) and lowest states (also South Dakota) after correcting per 100 000 enrollees. CONCLUSIONS: This pronounced increase in the number of naloxone prescriptions to Medicaid patients from 2018 to 2021 indicates a national response to this widespread public health emergency. Further research into the origins of the pronounced state-level disparities is warranted.


Subject(s)
Medicaid , Medicare , Naloxone , Narcotic Antagonists , United States , Humans , Medicaid/economics , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Naloxone/therapeutic use , Naloxone/economics , Medicare/economics , Narcotic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Narcotic Antagonists/economics , Retrospective Studies , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Drug Prescriptions/economics , Male
13.
Science ; 384(6697): 726, 2024 May 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38753794

ABSTRACT

Universities could no longer store Medicare and Medicaid data, and costs would rise.


Subject(s)
Access to Information , Medicaid , Medicare , Humans , Medicaid/economics , Medicare/economics , United States , Universities
15.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM ; 6(5): 101364, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38574857

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Emergency Medicaid is a restricted benefits program for individuals who have low-income status and who are immigrants. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of 2 strategies of pregnancy coverage for Emergency Medicaid recipients: the federal minimum of covering the delivery only vs extended coverage to 60 days after delivery. STUDY DESIGN: A decision analytical Markov model was developed to evaluate the outcomes and costs of these policies, and the results in a theoretical cohort of 100,000 postpartum Emergency Medicaid recipients were considered. The payor perspective was adopted. Health outcomes and cost-effectiveness over a 1- and 3-year time horizon were investigated. All probabilities, utilities, and costs were obtained from the literature. Our primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the competing strategies. RESULTS: Extending Emergency Medicaid to 60 days after delivery was determined to be a cost-saving strategy. Providing postpartum and contraceptive care resulted in 33,900 additional people receiving effective contraception in the first year and prevented 7290 additional unintended pregnancies. Over 1 year, it resulted in a gain of 1566 quality-adjusted life year at a cost of $10,903 per quality-adjusted life year. By 3 years of policy change, greater improvements were observed in all outcomes, and the expansion of Emergency Medicaid became cost saving and the dominant strategy. CONCLUSION: The inclusion of postpartum care and contraception for immigrant women who have low-income status resulted in lower costs and improved health outcomes.


Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Markov Chains , Medicaid , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Humans , Female , Medicaid/economics , Pregnancy , United States , Pregnancy, Unplanned , Adult , Poverty , Emigrants and Immigrants/statistics & numerical data , Comprehensive Health Care/economics , Postnatal Care/economics , Postnatal Care/methods , Postnatal Care/statistics & numerical data , Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
16.
Soc Sci Med ; 349: 116851, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38642520

ABSTRACT

The characteristic features of 21st-century corporate capitalism - monopoly and financialization - are increasingly being recognized by public health scholars as undermining the foundations of human health. While the "vectors" through which this is occurring are well known - poverty, inequality, climate change among others - locating the root cause of this process in the nature and institutions of contemporary capitalism is relatively new. Researchers have been somewhat slow to study the relationship between contemporary capitalism and human health. In this paper, we focus on one of the leading causes of death in the United States; cancer, and empirically estimate the relationship between various measures of financialization and monopoly in the US healthcare system and cancer mortality. The measures we focus on are for the hospital industry, the health insurance industry, and the pharmaceutical industry. Using a fixed effects model with different specifications and control variables, our analysis is at the state level for the years 2012-2019. These variables include data on population demographic controls, social and economic factors, and health behavior and clinical care. We compare Medicaid expansion states with non-Medicaid expansion states to investigate variations in state-level funded health insurance coverage. The results show a statistically significant positive correlation between the HHI index in the individual healthcare market and cancer mortality and the opioid dispensing rate and cancer mortality.


Subject(s)
Capitalism , Health Care Sector , Neoplasms , Humans , United States/epidemiology , Neoplasms/mortality , Health Care Sector/economics , Drug Industry/economics , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Medicaid/economics , Insurance, Health/statistics & numerical data , Insurance, Health/economics
17.
JAMA Psychiatry ; 81(6): 537-538, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38568603

ABSTRACT

This Viewpoint explains the Medicaid Reentry Section 1115 Demonstration Opportunity of April 2023 and recommends strategies to optimize this opportunity for community connection and mental health care.


Subject(s)
Medicaid , United States , Medicaid/economics , Humans , Mental Health Services/economics , Prisoners/psychology
19.
Am J Rhinol Allergy ; 38(4): 218-222, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38544439

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Obtaining insurance approval is a necessary component of healthcare in the United States and denials of these claims have been estimated to result in a loss of 3% to 5% of revenue. OBJECTIVE: Examine the trends in insurance denials for rhinological procedures. METHODS: A retrospective review of deidentified financial data of patients who were treated by participating physicians across 3 institutions from January 1, 2021, to June 30, 2023. The data was queried for rhinological and non-rhinological procedures via CPT codes. Cumulative insurance denials were calculated and stratified by procedure and insurance type. Write-offs were dollar amounts associated with final denials. RESULTS: A sample of 102,984 procedures and visits revealed a final denial rate between 2.2% and 2.9% across institutions (p = .72). The top three rhinological procedures for final write-offs were: nasal endoscopy (16.24%, $111,836.87), nasal debridement or polypectomy (6.48%, $79,457.51), and destruction of intranasal lesion (2.11%, $56,932.20). The write-off percentage for each procedure was highest among commercial insurance payers as opposed to Medicare or Medicaid. CONCLUSION: Final denial rates of rhinology procedures ranged between 2% and 3%. Common procedures such as nasal endoscopy and nasal debridement are among the highest written-off procedures. Insurance denials can lead to notable revenue loss. Rhinology practices must continue to remain knowledgeable of the changes and effects of insurance reimbursement on their practice.


Subject(s)
Otolaryngology , Humans , United States , Retrospective Studies , Otolaryngology/economics , Medicare/economics , Endoscopy/economics , Endoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Insurance, Health/economics , Insurance, Health/statistics & numerical data , Medicaid/economics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...