Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 44
Filter
1.
Rev Alerg Mex ; 71(1): 76, 2024 Feb 01.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38683093

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To relate the topical use of cannabis as an analgesic therapeutic alternative in patients with some inflammatory diseases in Salud Social I.P.S during May to July 2023. METHODS: An analytical, retrospective study was carried out. The population from which the sample was obtained corresponds to patients diagnosed with Arthrosis, Unspecified, Non-Toxic Multinodular Goiter, Epilepsy, Unspecified Type Venous Insufficiency (Chronic) (Peripheral), Unspecified Lumbago, Secondary Gonarthrosis, Rotator Cuff Syndrome, Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, in Salud Social I.P.S of Barranquilla, Atlántico. A sample of 23 patients diagnosed with these pathologies was obtained by non-probabilistic convenience sampling. RESULTS: All patients showed pain relief after two months of follow-up, two experienced adverse effects. Some studies suggest that cannabinoids present in cannabis, such as CBD and THC, may have analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties that could alleviate pain and inflammation associated with these conditions. This is consistent with the present study. CONCLUSION: Topical cannabis is presented as a therapeutic alternative in inflammatory diseases, however, it is important to highlight that research on the use of cannabis in these diseases is limited and more studies are needed to fully understand its effects and potential benefits.


OBJETIVO: Relacionar el uso tópico de cannabis como alternativa terapéutica analgésica en pacientes con algunas enfermedades inflamatorias, de la IPS Salud Social, entre mayo y julio de 2023. MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio analítico, retrospectivo. La población de donde se obtuvo la muestra, corresponde a pacientes diagnosticados con Artrosis no especificada, bocio multinodular no tóxico, Epilepsia tipo no especificado, insuficiencia venosa crónica y periférica, Lumbago no especificado, gonartrosis secundaria, síndrome de manguito rotador, síndrome del túnel carpiano, de la IPS Salud Social de Barranquilla, Atlántico. Se obtuvo una muestra de 23 pacientes diagnosticados con estas patologías mediante muestreo no probabilístico por conveniencia. RESULTADOS: Todos los pacientes mostraron alivio del dolor, después de dos meses de seguimiento; dos experimentaron efectos adversos. Algunos estudios sugieren que los cannabinoides presentes en el cannabis, como el CBD y el THC, podrían tener propiedades analgésicas y antiinflamatorias que podrían aliviar el dolor y la inflamación asociados con estas afecciones, lo que es coherente con el presente estudio. CONCLUSIÓN: El cannabis tópico se presenta como una alternativa terapéutica para enfermedades inflamatorias, sin embargo, es importante destacar que la investigación sobre el uso del cannabis en estas enfermedades es limitada y se necesitan más estudios para comprender completamente sus efectos y beneficios potenciales.


Subject(s)
Inflammation , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Male , Colombia , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Inflammation/drug therapy , Aged , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Analgesics/administration & dosage , Administration, Topical , Medical Marijuana/therapeutic use , Medical Marijuana/administration & dosage
2.
Rev. ADM ; 81(2): 87-90, mar.-abr. 2024.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1561906

ABSTRACT

Aun cuando las autoridades del Sector Salud en México no se han declarado respecto al uso medicinal de la marihuana, con el objetivo de conocer el estado actual internacional sobre sus riesgos y usos terapéuticos, investigamos los avances reportados en la actualidad, así como las comunidades que han despenalizado su uso. Se presenta su origen como elemento terapéutico, pueblos involucrados, diversas denominaciones, historicidad, las diversas preparaciones, farmacodinamia, sus efectos nocivos a la salud en general y particularmente en boca, sus posibles usos en odontología tomando en cuenta sus propiedades terapéuticas. ampliamente reseñadas en relación a otros lugares del organismo. Finalmente, la propuesta de investigación en odontología con especial énfasis en aquellas especialidades donde la inflamación y el dolor agudo estén presentes de manera significativa (AU)


Although health authorities in Mexico have not officially declared their stance on the medicinal use of marijuana, our research aims to explore the current international status regarding its risks and therapeutic uses. We have investigated the latest reported advancements and examined communities that have decriminalized its usage. This presentation encompasses its therapeutic origin, involved communities, various designations, historical context, diverse preparations, pharmacodynamics, its adverse effects on overall health and particularly oral health, as well as its potential applications in dentistry, considering its widely documented therapeutic properties in comparison to other areas of the body. Finally, our research proposal in dentistry places special emphasis on specialties where inflammation and acute pain are significantly present (AU)


Subject(s)
Cannabidiol , Cannabis/adverse effects , Mouth Diseases/etiology , Dronabinol/adverse effects , Cannabinoids/history , Medical Marijuana/therapeutic use , Mouth Mucosa/drug effects
3.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 30(4): 737-751, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38477532

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Natural and synthetic cannabinoids are being used worldwide to treat various symptoms in cancer patients. This study aims to map the therapeutic benefits and adverse effects associated with the use of cannabis-based drugs in these outcomes. METHODS: Following Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines a scoping review was conducted. The study protocol was available in the Open Science Framework public repository. An extensive search strategy involving databases like Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, Medline/PubMed, Lilacs, Google Scholar, and Open Gray for gray literature analysis was executed by a skilled librarian. The inclusion criteria were primary studies (observational and randomized) that evaluated the efficacy and safety of cannabinoids in cancer patients. The review encompassed studies of diverse designs, publication years, and types, as long as they addressed cannabinoids' impact in oncology. RESULTS: Twenty-nine (82.86%) out of total of 35 were randomized and 6 (14.14%) were non-randomized. About 57.1% of studies utilized registered products as interventions, with THC being the most natural cannabinoid cited in variable doses and administration routes. Moreover, 62.85% of studies specified the cancer types (breast, lung, sarcomas, hematological and reproductive system), while only one study detailed cancer staging. The evaluated outcomes encompassed nausea and vomiting (77.14%), appetite (11.43%), pain (8.57%), and tumor regression (2.86%) across different proportions of studies. CONCLUSION: Cannabinoids show promise in managing pain, emesis, and anorexia/cachexia linked to cancer progression. New randomized clinical trials with a larger number of participants and observational studies on long-term safety are crucial to affirm their medicinal utility for cancer patients unresponsive to conventional drugs.


Subject(s)
Cannabinoids , Medical Marijuana , Neoplasms , Humans , Medical Marijuana/therapeutic use , Medical Marijuana/adverse effects , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Cannabinoids/therapeutic use , Cannabinoids/adverse effects , Vomiting/chemically induced , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Nausea/chemically induced
4.
Cannabis Cannabinoid Res ; 9(1): 21-34, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38252501

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The use of medical Cannabis remains unregulated in several countries due to the scarcity of clinical studies with high scientific evidence that establish safety and efficacy of Cannabis products. This study aimed to comprehensively analyze how knowledge has been created in this field, as well as perform a bibliographic mapping to identify knowledge gaps, and investigate key authors and journals that have significantly contributed to advancing our understanding of Cannabis. Method: The study protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Review (CRD42020223084). A systematic search was conducted in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Lilacs, Google Scholar, PubMed, SciELO, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. The bibliographic analysis and mapping were registered using the VOSviewer, Sci2tool, CiteSpace, and PoP software. Results: The systematic search identified 27,597 records, with 17,020 duplicates, resulting in a total of 10,577 articles included. The authors who published the most were Marilyn Ann Huestis (n=108) and Sagnik Bhattacharyya (n=71), while Elisaldo A. Carlini and Raphael Mechoulam published 8 and 22 articles, respectively. The journals Drug and Alcohol Dependence (n=297), Psychopharmacology (n=159) and Addictive Behaviors (n=150) were the ones that published the most on Cannabis. The journals suggest that the articles are correlated with the adverse and toxicological effects of recreational Cannabis use; however, most articles focus on medical Cannabis. The peak of publications was in 2021 (n=1,481). The countries that published the most were the United States (n=9,735), while Brazil occupied the 11th position (n=422). Most publications were carried out in "Pharmacology and Pharmacy" (11.31%), followed by "Psychiatry" (7.66%) and "Medicine" (5.80%). The areas of "Neurosciences" (1.59%), "Biochemistry," "Genetics," and "Molecular Biology" (0.79%) were little explored. Conclusion: This study captured the characteristics of publications about Cannabis and clinical studies in the scientific literature, yielding >10,000 articles, representing a large literature review, to date. Therefore, the most productive countries included the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada, while the most productive authors were Marilyn Ann Huestis and Sagnik Bhattacharyya, with a peak of publications in 2021. Finally, the most chosen journals were Drug and Alcohol Dependence and Psychopharmacology.


Subject(s)
Bibliometrics , Cannabis , Medical Marijuana , Humans , Medical Marijuana/therapeutic use
5.
Rev. méd. Urug ; 39(3): e201, sept. 2023.
Article in Spanish | LILACS, BNUY | ID: biblio-1515426

ABSTRACT

Introducción: los cannabinoides pueden ser una opción válida para el tratamiento del dolor crónico no oncológico de acuerdo a los estudios publicados hasta el momento y a nuestra experiencia clínica. Objetivo: valorar el beneficio clínico de preparados de cannabis medicinal (CM) para dolor crónico no oncológico en pacientes que consultaron en la Clínica de Endocannabinología del Uruguay (CEDU). Material y método: estudio descriptivo, observacional, longitudinal, de una población atendida en un centro privado de salud. Se trata de una cohorte de 438 pacientes que consultaron espontáneamente en CEDU desde septiembre de 2016 a marzo de 2020. El motivo de consulta fue dolor crónico no oncológico que no respondió al tratamiento estándar. Resultados: en la cohorte estudiada predominaron las mujeres (74%), promedio 69 años, que se asisten en el sistema privado de salud en el 95% de los casos, en su mayoría con instrucción secundaria. El tipo de dolor más frecuente fue el dolor osteoarticular. El quimiotipo de CM más usado fue cannabidiol (CBD) al 5%, con buena respuesta al tratamiento en el descenso del nivel del dolor y suspensión o disminución de uso de opioides (y derivados) y antiinflamatorios no esteroideos (AINES). Se observaron escasos y leves efectos adversos (EA) en la gran mayoría de los pacientes. Abandonaron el tratamiento 12 pacientes (menos del 3%). Conclusiones: esta investigación retrospectiva mostró una caída del nivel del dolor de 3,14 (valor p ≤ 0,0001), indicando que el CM puede ser una opción para el tratamiento del dolor crónico no oncológico. Se requieren más estudios para demostrar la efectividad y seguridad de los cannabinoides. Esto depende de muchos factores (leyes que faciliten la accesibilidad a variedad de productos de CM de grado médico, incentivos a la ciencia e investigación). De todas formas, podemos afirmar que los resultados presentados son prometedores en relación con su potencial terapéutico.


Introduction: Cannabinoids can be a valid option for the treatment of chronic non-cancer pain, according to the studies published to date and our clinical experience. Objectives: To evaluate the clinical benefit of medicinal cannabis preparations (MCPs) for chronic non-cancer pain in patients seen at the Endocannabinology Clinic of Uruguay (CEDU). Method: Descriptive, observational, longitudinal study of a population treated at a private healthcare center. This involves a cohort of 438 patients who spontaneously consulted at CEDU from September 2016 to March 2020. The reason for consultation was chronic non-cancer pain that did not respond to standard treatment. Results: in the studied cohort, women prevailed and accounted for 74% of patients. Average age was 69 years old and 95% of them sought care within the private healthcare system. Most women had completed secondary school education. The most frequent type of pain was osteoarticular pain. The most used chemovar of Medicinal Cannabis (MC) was 5% cannabidiol (CBD), showing a favorable treatment response in reducing pain levels and the discontinuation or reduction of opioid and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) usage. Few and mild adverse effects (AE) were observed in the vast majority of patients. Twelve patients (less than 3%) discontinued the treatment. Conclusions: This retrospective study demonstrated a reduction in pain level of 3.14 (p-value ≤ 0.0001) indicating that MC could be an option for the treatment of non-oncological chronic pain. Further studies are needed to demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of cannabinoids. This depends on many factors (laws facilitating accessibility to a variety of medical-grade MC products, incentives for science and research). Nevertheless, we can assert that the presented results are promising in consideration of their therapeutic potential.


Introdução: os canabinoides podem ser uma opção válida para o tratamento da dor crônica não oncológica de acordo com estudos publicados até o momento e nossa experiência clínica. Objetivos: avaliar o benefício clínico das preparações de Cannabis Medicinal (CM) para dor crônica não oncológica em pacientes que consultaram a Clínica de Endocanabinologia do Uruguai (CEDU). Método: estudo descritivo, observacional, longitudinal de uma população atendida em um centro de saúde privado. Esta é uma coorte de 438 pacientes que consultaram espontaneamente no CEDU no período setembro de 2016 - março de 2020. O motivo da consulta foi dor crônica não oncológica que não respondeu ao tratamento padrão. Resultados: na coorte estudada, 74% eram mulheres, a idade média foi 69 anos, 95% frequentam a rede privada de saúde e a maioria com ensino médio. O tipo de dor mais frequente foi a osteoarticular. O quimiotipo de MC mais utilizado foi o Canabidiol 5% (CBD), com boa resposta ao tratamento em termos de redução do nível de dor e suspensão ou redução do uso de opioides (e derivados) e anti-inflamatórios não esteroides (AINEs). A grande maioria dos pacientes apresentou poucos e leves efeitos adversos (EAs). Menos de 3% dos 12 pacientes abandonou o tratamento. Conclusões: Esta investigação retrospectiva mostrou uma queda no nível de dor de 3,14 (valor de p ≤ 0,0001), indicando que o MC pode ser uma opção para o tratamento da dor crônica não oncológica. São necessários mais estudos para demonstrar a eficácia e segurança dos canabinoides. Isso depende de muitos fatores (leis que facilitem o acesso a uma variedade de produtos CM de grau médico, incentivos para ciência e pesquisa). De qualquer forma, podemos afirmar que os resultados apresentados são promissores em relação ao seu potencial terapêutico.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain/therapy , Medical Marijuana/therapeutic use , Dronabinol , Cannabidiol , Cannabis , Epidemiology, Descriptive , Longitudinal Studies , Observational Study
6.
Medicina (B Aires) ; 83(1): 163-171, 2023.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36774616

ABSTRACT

The scientific, technological, and economic development of medicinal cannabis requires the evolution of public regulations and policies that address the phenomenon of the rediscovery of the scientific and therapeutic power of medicinal cannabis of pharmaceutical quality. To address the problem of the non-existence of cannabisderived products from the national industry with health approval, the Government of Jujuy decided to implement a comprehensive state approach to public health. In this article we develop the central axes of a management model, which includes the creation of a legal and institutional framework, the implementation of a health program that includes professional training, research and the preparation of scientific evidence of high quality, within the framework of a program for the public production of pharmaceutical-grade cannabis that covers the entire production chain, from cultivation to pharmaceutical preparation and subsequent distribution in pharmacies under international standards of good practice. The program has been in force since 2017, focusing on the challenges of a developing national regulatory landscape that coexists with the stigmatization of the cannabis plant in the social and medical framework, the difficulties of financing and the scarce world evidence in effective health plans of medical cannabis. Our experience can collaborate with other health administrators, with similar or different socio-demographics and regulatory environment, to resolve barriers to access to medical cannabis and improve the conditions of patients who require it.


El desarrollo científico, tecnológico y económico del cannabis medicinal requiere la evolución de las normas y políticas públicas que abordan el fenómeno del redescubrimiento de la potencia científica y terapéutica del cannabis medicinal de calidad farmacéutica. Para encarar la problemática de la inexistencia de productos derivados de cannabis de industria nacional con aprobación sanitaria, el Gobierno de Jujuy decidió implementar un abordaje estatal integral de salud pública. En este artículo desarrollamos los ejes centrales de un modelo de gestión que comprende la creación de un marco legal e institucional, la implementación de un programa sanitario que incluye la capacitación profesional, la investigación y la elaboración de evidencia científica de alta calidad, en el marco de un programa de producción pública de cannabis de grado farmacéutico que abarca toda la cadena productiva, desde el cultivo hasta la ela boración farmacéutica y la posterior distribución en farmacias bajo normas internacionales de buenas prácticas. El programa se encuentra en vigencia desde 2017, dentro de un panorama regulatorio nacional en desarrollo que convive con la estigmatización de la planta de cannabis en el marco social y médico, las dificultades de financiación y la escasa evidencia mundial en planes sanitarios efectivos de cannabis medicinal. Nuestra experiencia puede colaborar con otros administradores de salud, con semejante o diferente socio-demografía y entorno regulatorio, para resolver las barreras de acceso al cannabis medicinal y mejorar las condiciones de los pacientes que lo requieran.


Subject(s)
Cannabis , Medical Marijuana , Humans , Medical Marijuana/therapeutic use , Argentina
8.
Rev. méd. Urug ; 39(2): e201, 2023.
Article in Spanish | LILACS, BNUY | ID: biblio-1442062

ABSTRACT

Introducción: el conocimiento del cannabis medicinal data de hace más de 10.000 años y tiene sus orígenes en el continente asiático y en la medicina oriental. En el último tiempo ha surgido especial interés en su uso terapéutico, y Uruguay desde 2013 cuenta con una ley que regula la tenencia y uso de la planta de cannabis. Objetivo: caracterizar el uso de los derivados de cannabis medicinal (DCM) en una población de usuarios uruguayos. Metodología: se realizó un estudio observacional, prospectivo, en una población de usuarios de DCM, a través de encuestas telefónicas. Los datos obtenidos se analizaron utilizando Excel®, mediante estadística descriptiva. Resultados: se incluyeron 32 usuarios entre 29 y 78 años, la mayoría de sexo femenino. La forma farmacéutica más utilizada fue el aceite y la principal indicación fue para el tratamiento del dolor. Se observó una disminución en la intensidad del dolor postratamiento. El principal efecto adverso observado fue la sequedad de boca. Conclusiones: es el primer estudio nacional en caracterizar el uso de DCM artesanal. Se incluyeron 32 usuarios de DCM artesanal. La principal indicación de DCM fue para el tratamiento del dolor, siendo la artrosis su principal causa. Todos los usos fueron para indicaciones no aprobadas si se compara con sus equivalentes industrializados. Predominó el uso en mujeres adultas. Se destacó una gran expectativa frente al inicio del uso. Los eventos adversos observados estuvieron dentro de los esperados y de entidad leve.


Summary: Introduction: knowledge on medical cannabis is over 10,000 years old and stems from Asian and Eastern medicine. In recent years, special interest on its therapeutic use has arisen, and in 2013 Uruguay passed a law to regulate possession and use of cannabis plants. Objective: to characterize the use of medicinal cannabis derivatives in a population of Uruguayan users. Method: observational, prospective study in a population of medicinal cannabis derivatives users through telephone surveys. Data obtained were analysed with Excel®, by using descriptive statistics. Results: thirty two users were included in the study, between 29 and 78 years old, most of which were female. The most widely used pharmaceutical form was oil and the main indication was to treat pain. A decline in pain intensity after treatment was observed. The main adverse effect observed was dry mouth. Conclusions: this is the first national study to characterize the use of artisanal medicinal cannabis derivatives. Thirty two users of artisanal medicinal cannabis derivatives were included in the study. The main indication for artisanal medicinal cannabis derivatives was the treatment of pain, arthrosis being the main cause. All users followed non-approved indications if compared to industrialized equivalents. The use was more extended among women. Great expectation upon initiation of use was noticed. Adverse events observed were mild and the expected.


Introdução: o conhecimento da cannabis medicinal remonta a mais de 10.000 anos e tem suas origens no continente asiático e na medicina oriental. Nos últimos tempos, surgiu um interesse especial em seu uso terapêutico e, desde 2013, o Uruguai possui uma lei que regula a posse e o uso da planta de cannabis. Objetivo: caracterizar o uso de derivados de cannabis medicinal (DCM) em uma população de usuários uruguaios. Metodologia: Foi realizado um estudo observacional, prospectivo, em uma população de usuários de DCM, por meio de inquéritos telefônicos. Os dados obtidos foram analisados ​​no programa Excel®, por meio de estatística descritiva. Resultados: foram incluídos 32 usuários entre 29 e 78 anos, a maioria do sexo feminino. A forma farmacêutica mais utilizada foi o óleo e a principal indicação foi para o tratamento da dor. Observou-se diminuição da intensidade da dor pós-tratamento. O principal efeito adverso observado foi boca seca. Conclusões: este é o primeiro estudo nacional a caracterizar o uso de DCM artesanal. Foram incluídos 32 usuários artesanais de DCM. A principal indicação da CMD foi para o tratamento da dor, sendo a osteoartrite sua principal causa. Todos os usos foram para indicações não aprovadas quando comparados aos seus equivalentes industrializados. Predominou o uso em mulheres adultas. Houve uma grande expectativa desde o início do uso. Os eventos adversos observados estavam dentro do esperado e de entidade leve.


Subject(s)
Cannabis , Medical Marijuana/therapeutic use , Osteoarthritis , Pain , Uruguay , Population Characteristics
9.
Rev. ANACEM (Impresa) ; 17(1): 13-21, 2023. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1525884

ABSTRACT

La presente es una revisión bibliográfica actualizada sobre el manejo de la Esclerosis Múltiple (EM), enfermedad neurológica progresiva de tipo desmielinizante más frecuente a nivel mundial. En Chile, su presentación remitente-recurrente (RRMS) es patología GES, por lo que se vuelve relevante para el médico general y estudiantes del área de la salud reconocer e identificar las terapias disponibles para el control de esta patología. Si bien la EM no es un cuadro frecuente, su sintomatología es alarmante e incapacitante, por lo que, con frecuencia, el primer acercamiento del paciente es a los servicios de urgencia, tornándose necesario contar con nociones básicas sobre el tratamiento y manejo. La presente revisión recopiló artículos publicados entre 2019 y 2023 de distintos motores de búsqueda con énfasis en el tratamiento farmacológico y no farmacológico de esta enfermedad. Además de describir el tratamiento convencional como la inmunomodulación, las terapias biológicas, el soporte con glucocorticoides y los fármacos remielinizantes, se abordan nuevas líneas de investigación prometedoras, como el rol inmunogénico de la microbiota intestinal, la capacidad epigenética de la dieta, estrategias de rehabilitación cognitiva y el potencial uso de cannabinoides para el manejo paliativo del dolor. Se concluye que un tratamiento oportuno con fármacos modificadores de la enfermedad, tanto de primera línea como de segunda, son imprescindibles para el manejo de la EM, sin embargo, la calidad de vida puede verse significativamente acrecentada por la incorporación de estrategias que se encuentran al alcance del médico general y que no requieren de derivación a nivel secundario.


This is an updated bibliographical review on the management of Multiple Sclerosis (MS), the most common progressive neurological disease of demyelinating disorders worldwide. In Chile, its relapsing-remitting presentation (RRMS) is a state-covered illness pathology, so it becomes relevant for the general practitioner and med students to recognize and identify therapies available for the control of this desease. Although MS is not a frequent condition, its symptoms are alarming and disabling, which is why, frequently, the first approach of the patient is to the emergency services, making it necessary to have basic knowledge about treatment and management. The present review compiled articles published between 2019 and 2023 from different search engines with an emphasis on the pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of the MS. In addition to describing conventional treatment such as immunomodulation, biological therapies, glucocorticoid support and remyelinating drugs, new promising lines of research are addressed, such as the immunogenic role of the intestinal microbiota, the epigenetic capacity of the diet, strategies on cognition rehabilitation and the potential use of cannabinoids for the palliative management of pain. It is concluded that the classic treatment with disease-modifying drugs, both first-line and second-line, are essential for the management of MS; however, quality of life can be significantly increased by incorporating strategies found at the reach of the general practitioner and do not require referral at a greater complexity center.


Subject(s)
Humans , Multiple Sclerosis/therapy , Vitamin D/therapeutic use , Interferons/therapeutic use , Demyelinating Diseases , Immunomodulation , Medical Marijuana/therapeutic use , Fingolimod Hydrochloride/therapeutic use , Dimethyl Fumarate/therapeutic use , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Glucocorticoids , Multiple Sclerosis/diagnosis
10.
Biomedica ; 42(3): 450-459, 2022 09 02.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36122285

ABSTRACT

Since ancient times cannabis has been used for recreational and medicinal purposes. It is a significant source of chemical compounds, most of them called phytocannabinoids. These compounds have several physiological effects and produce their effects primarily by binding to endogenous cannabinoid receptors such as CB1 and CB2, among others. Cannabis has potential therapeutic properties and its preparations have been used as traditional remedies to treat pain and emesis. Synthetic cannabinoids are used clinically as analgesics, antispastics, antiemetics, and appetite stimulants. Significant cannabis toxicity is rare in adults; however, it can produce countless acute and chronic side effects. The quality of the evidence in this field is limited by the short duration of the trials, poor sample sizes, lack of a control group, and the existence of bias in most of the reviewed studies. Therefore, a larger number of studies with better methodological quality is required to support the safe use of this therapy. The decision to include cannabinoids as a treatment for any of the conditions described will depend on the evidence, the use of previous therapies, and the type of patient.


El cannabis se ha utilizado desde la antigüedad con fines recreativos y medicinales. Es una fuente muy rica de compuestos químicos, la mayoría denominados fitocannabinoides, que tienen una variedad de efectos fisiológicos, principalmente por su unión a receptores cannabinoides endógenos como el CB1 y CB2, entre otros. El cannabis tiene propiedades terapéuticas potenciales y sus preparaciones se han utilizado como remedios tradicionales para tratar el dolor y la emesis. Los cannabinoides sintéticos se utilizan clínicamente como analgésicos, antiespasmódico, antieméticos y estimulantes del apetito. La toxicidad significativa del cannabis es poco común en los adultos, sin embargo, puede tener múltiples efectos adversos agudos y crónicos. La calidad de la evidencia en este campo se ha visto limitada por la corta duración de los estudios, los reducidos tamaños de las muestras, la falta de grupos de control y la existencia de sesgos en la mayoría de los estudios revisados. En este contexto, son necesarios más estudios de mejor calidad metodológica para apoyar el uso seguro de esta terapia en otras enfermedades. La decisión de incorporar los cannabinoides como terapia en alguna de las condiciones descritas depende de la evidencia, el uso de terapias previas y el tipo de paciente.


Subject(s)
Antiemetics , Cannabinoids , Cannabis , Medical Marijuana , Analgesics , Antiemetics/therapeutic use , Appetite Stimulants/therapeutic use , Cannabinoids/therapeutic use , Humans , Medical Marijuana/therapeutic use , Receptors, Cannabinoid
11.
Med. infant ; 29(3): 205-211, Septiembre 2022. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS, UNISALUD, BINACIS | ID: biblio-1399593

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: Reportamos resultados sobre la efectividad, seguridad y tolerancia del cannabidiol como adyuvante terapéutico en pacientes pediátricos con encefalopatías epilépticas del desarrollo (EED) resistentes al tratamiento farmacológico y no farmacológico tras un seguimiento promedio de 20 meses. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio de cohorte prospectivo para evaluar la eficacia, la seguridad y la tolerancia del aceite de cannabis medicinal enriquecido con CBD añadido a los medicamentos anticonvulsivos estándar en niños con EED resistentes a los medicamentos atendidos en un único centro. Resultados: Entre octubre de 2018 y marzo de 2020, se incluyeron 59 pacientes. La edad media en el momento del inicio del protocolo fue de 10,5 años (rango, 2-17 años). La mediana de la duración del tratamiento fue de 20 meses (rango, 12-32). La mediana de edad en el momento de la primera convulsión fue de 8 meses (rango, 1 día - 10 años). Al final del seguimiento, el 78% de los niños tenía una disminución ≥ 50% en frecuencia de las crisis y el 47,5% tenía una disminución > 75%. Siete pacientes (11,9%) estaban libres de convulsiones. El número de crisis se redujo de una mediana de 305/mes a 90/mes, que supone una reducción media del 57% y una mediana del 71% (p < 0,0001). Los efectos adversos fueron en su mayoría leves o moderados. El CBD se interrumpió en 17 pacientes (28,8%) por falta de respuesta al tratamiento, aumento de la frecuencia de las convulsiones, intolerancia al fármaco o cumplimiento terapéutico insuficiente. Conclusión: En los niños con EED resistentes a los fármacos, el tratamiento a largo plazo del cannabis medicinal enriquecido con CBD como terapia adyuvante resultó ser seguro, bien tolerado y eficaz. Las reducciones sostenidas en la frecuencia de las convulsiones y la mejora de los aspectos de la vida diaria se observaron en comparación con nuestros preliminares (AU)


Objective: We report results on the effectiveness, safety, and tolerance of cannabidiol (CBD) as add-on therapy in children with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEE) resistant to pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment after a mean follow-up of 20 months. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of CBD-enriched medical cannabis oil added to standard antiseizure medications in children with drug-resistant DEEs seen at a single center. Results: Between October 2018 and March 2020, 59 patients were included. The median age at protocol initiation was 10.5 years (range, 2-17 years). Median treatment duration was 20 months (range, 12-32). The median age at the time of the first seizure was 8 months (range, 1 day - 10 years). At the end of follow-up, 78% of the children had a decrease ≥ 50% in seizure frequency and 47.5% had a decrease of > 75%. Seven patients (11.9%) were seizure free. The number of seizures was reduced from a median of 305/month to 90/month, accounting for a mean reduction of 57% and a median of 71% (p < 0.0001). Adverse effects were mostly mild or moderate. CBD was discontinued in 17 patients (28.8%) due to lack of response to treatment, increased seizure frequency, drug intolerance, or poor compliance. Conclusion: In children with drug-resistant DEE, long-term treatment with CBD-enriched medicinal cannabis as add-on therapy proved to be safe, well tolerated, and effective. Sustained reductions in seizure frequency and improvement in aspects of daily living were observed compared to our preliminary results (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Child, Preschool , Child , Adolescent , Cannabidiol/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Medical Marijuana/therapeutic use , Lennox Gastaut Syndrome/drug therapy , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/drug therapy , Hospitals, Pediatric , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Cohort Studies
13.
Article in English, Portuguese | LILACS, BDENF - Nursing | ID: biblio-1398946

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: apresentar o estado da arte das publicações expressas na literatura cientifica mundial sobre a temática, bem como identificar os benefícios terapêuticos da Cannabis medicinal no tratamento da dor. Método: trata-se de uma revisão integrativa da literatura, cuja busca de dados foi realizada nas bibliotecas virtuais. Web of Science, Scopus, Medline, IBECS, Lilacs, Cochrane Library, Emerald Insight e Scielo no período de agosto a outubro de 2021. Resultados: foram encontrados 367 artigos. Quarenta e três artigos foram selecionados para serem lidos na íntegra e 15 atenderam aos critérios desta revisão. Conclusão: as evidências mostram que embora cada vez mais prescritos ou autorizados, a cannabis medicinal ou os Canabinóides para a dor crónica continuam a ser controversos para muitos médicos.


Objective: to present the state of the art of publications expressed in the world scientific literature on the subject, as well as to identify the therapeutic benefits of medicinal cannabis in the treatment of pain. Method: this is an integrative literature review, whose data search was performed in virtual libraries. Web of Science, Scopus, Medline, IBECS, Lilacs, Cochrane Library, Emerald Insight and Scielo from August to October 2021. Results: 367 articles were found. Forty-three articles were selected to be read in full and 15 met the criteria of this review. Conclusion: evidence shows that although increasingly prescribed or authorized, medical cannabis or Cannabinoids for chronic pain remain controversial for many physicians.


Objetivo: presentar el estado del arte de las publicaciones expresadas en la literatura científica mundial sobre el tema, así como identificar los beneficios terapéuticos del cannabis medicinal en el tratamiento del dolor. Método: se trata de una revisión integradora de la literatura, cuya búsqueda de datos se realizó en bibliotecas virtuales. Web of Science, Scopus, Medline, IBECS, Lilacs, Cochrane Library, Emerald Insight y Scielo de agosto a octubre de 2021. Resultados: se encontraron 367 artículos. Se seleccionaron 43 artículos para ser leídos en su totalidad y 15 cumplieron con los criterios de esta revisión. Conclusión: la evidencia muestra que, aunque cada vez más se prescribe o autoriza, el cannabis medicinal o los cannabinoides para el dolor crónico siguen siendo controvertidos para muchos médicos.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Cannabinoids/therapeutic use , Chronic Pain/therapy , Medical Marijuana/therapeutic use , Neoplasms/therapy , Cannabis/drug effects
14.
P R Health Sci J ; 40(3): 110-114, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34792923

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In 2017, the government of Puerto Rico legalized medical cannabis for several conditions including Crohn's disease (CD). There is little information about cannabis use in this population. This study aimed to develop a demographic characterization and evaluate patient perception on cannabis use for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) at the University of Puerto Rico Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. METHODS: One hundred patients of ages 21 or older with a confirmed diagnosis of IBD were recruited to complete a voluntary anonymous questionnaire. RESULTS: 27% of the surveyed participants reported use of cannabis. Of these, 39% reported moderate knowledge and 53% reported little to no knowledge of medical cannabis. The majority did not discuss cannabis use with their physician (78%), and most saw improvement of their symptoms (68%). CONCLUSION: Cannabis is frequently considered by patients as a treatment option for IBD but most have limited knowledge about its use. The low number of patients that discuss cannabis use with their physician suggests the need for physician awareness of unreported use. It should also lead to the development of strategies for patient orientation regarding the uses, properties, and expectations of cannabis as a therapy.


Subject(s)
Cannabis/chemistry , Crohn Disease/drug therapy , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Medical Marijuana/therapeutic use , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Perception , Puerto Rico , Young Adult
16.
Expert Rev Neurother ; 20(8): 849-854, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32515670

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) may suffer from spasticity and pain during their disease course. Baclofen, dantrolene, diazepam and gabapentin have been used as first-line options to treat these conditions, with modest results. Medical use of marijuana smoking has bypassed traditional clinical trials and has been legalized as a therapeutic option for MS-related spasticity and pain in some countries. Cannabis-derived drugs have been tested and approved for medical use. AREAS COVERED: With the development of nabiximols by the pharmaceutical industry, more countries have made it possible for patients with MS to have legal access to cannabis-related therapies. The evidence-based data on nabiximols and MS-related spasticity, pain, and urinary symptoms is consistent. There are over 7,500 patients reported in 33 studies (12 from the United Kingdom and 11 from Italy). EXPERT OPINION: Nabiximols is safe and effective for patients with MS whose spasticity could not be treated with the first-line oral drugs. At present, legislation, bureaucracy and costs involved in prescribing this drug limit the experience of neurologists from many countries. There is no scientific evidence that smoking marijuana can be beneficial to patients with MS.


Subject(s)
Cannabidiol/therapeutic use , Cannabinoid Receptor Modulators/therapeutic use , Dronabinol/therapeutic use , Medical Marijuana/therapeutic use , Multiple Sclerosis/drug therapy , Muscle Spasticity/drug therapy , Pain/drug therapy , Urologic Diseases/drug therapy , Drug Combinations , Humans , Multiple Sclerosis/complications , Muscle Spasticity/etiology , Pain/etiology , Urologic Diseases/etiology
17.
BMC Complement Med Ther ; 20(1): 12, 2020 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32020875

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although cannabis and cannabinoids are widely used with therapeutic purposes, their claimed efficacy is highly controversial. For this reason, medical cannabis use is a broad field of research that is rapidly expanding. Our objectives are to identify, characterize, appraise, and organize the current available evidence surrounding therapeutic use of cannabis and cannabinoids, using evidence maps. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and CINAHL, to identify systematic reviews (SRs) published from their inception up to December 2017. Two authors assessed eligibility and extracted data independently. We assessed methodological quality of the included SRs using the AMSTAR tool. To illustrate the extent of use of medical cannabis, we organized the results according to identified PICO questions using bubble plots corresponding to different clinical scenarios. RESULTS: A total of 44 SRs published between 2001 and 2017 were included in this evidence mapping with data from 158 individual studies. We extracted 96 PICO questions in the following medical conditions: multiple sclerosis, movement disorders (e.g. Tourette Syndrome, Parkinson Disease), psychiatry conditions, Alzheimer disease, epilepsy, acute and chronic pain, cancer, neuropathic pain, symptoms related to cancer (e.g. emesis and anorexia related with chemotherapy), rheumatic disorders, HIV-related symptoms, glaucoma, and COPD. The evidence about these conditions is heterogeneous regarding the conclusions and the quality of the individual primary studies. The quality of the SRs was moderate to high according to AMSTAR scores. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence on medical uses of cannabis is broad. However, due to methodological limitations, conclusions were weak in most of the assessed comparisons. Evidence mapping methodology is useful to perform an overview of available research, since it is possible to systematically describe the extent and distribution of evidence, and to organize scattered data.


Subject(s)
Cannabinoids/therapeutic use , Cannabis , Medical Marijuana/therapeutic use , Humans , Systematic Reviews as Topic
19.
Arch. argent. pediatr ; 118(1): 64-67, 2020-02-00.
Article in English, Spanish | LILACS, BINACIS | ID: biblio-1095682

ABSTRACT

En los últimos años, se ha observado un incremento significativo en el interés por la prescripción del cannabis medicinal. En el siguiente artículo, se informa acerca de la escasa base científica que avala la prescripción de estos compuestos en un listado amplio y diverso de patologías médicas. Se considera fundamental que cualquier sustancia que vaya a ser utilizada en humanos siga un protocolo de aprobación estricto y científico, que pueda desligarse de modas o de resultados individuales. Es necesario que, antes de la prescripción de una droga en personas, deba tenerse un panorama claro de cuáles son los usos del compuesto en cuestión, pero, sobre todo, de su seguridad, que es prácticamente desconocida en el cannabis medicinal.


In recent years, the interest in medical cannabis prescription has increased significantly. This article provides information about the little scientific basis supporting the prescription of these products for a wide and diverse range of medical conditions. It is critical for any substance to be used in human beings to follow a strict scientific approval protocol, detached from any trend or individual outcome. Before prescribing any drug to human beings, it is necessary to have a clear picture of its uses, especially its safety, which is practically unknown in the case of medical cannabis.


Subject(s)
Humans , Cannabidiol/adverse effects , Cannabidiol/therapeutic use , Medical Marijuana/adverse effects , Medical Marijuana/therapeutic use , Safety , Dronabinol/therapeutic use , Cannabidiol/pharmacology , Compassionate Use Trials , Legislation, Drug
20.
Arch Argent Pediatr ; 118(1): 64-67, 2020 02.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31984702

ABSTRACT

In recent years, the interest in medical cannabis prescription has increased significantly. This article provides information about the little scientific basis supporting the prescription of these products for a wide and diverse range of medical conditions. It is critical for any substance to be used in human beings to follow a strict scientific approval protocol, detached from any trend or individual outcome. Before prescribing any drug to human beings, it is necessary to have a clear picture of its uses, especially its safety, which is practically unknown in the case of medical cannabis.


En los últimos años, se ha observado un incremento significativo en el interés por la prescripción del cannabis medicinal. En el siguiente artículo, se informa acerca de la escasa base científica que avala la prescripción de estos compuestos en un listado amplio y diverso de patologías médicas. Se considera fundamental que cualquier sustancia que vaya a ser utilizada en humanos siga un protocolo de aprobación estricto y científico, que pueda desligarse de modas o de resultados individuales. Es necesario que, antes de la prescripción de una droga en personas, deba tenerse un panorama claro de cuáles son los usos del compuesto en cuestión, pero, sobre todo, de su seguridad, que es prácticamente desconocida en el cannabis medicinal.


Subject(s)
Drug Approval , Medical Marijuana/therapeutic use , Argentina , Drug Approval/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Medical Marijuana/adverse effects , Risk
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL