Rasch validation of the revised body awareness rating questionnaire (BARQ-R) in adults with and without musculoskeletal pain.

BACKGROUND: The Revised Body Awareness Rating Questionnaire (BARQ-R) is a self-report measure of body awareness. First aim: evaluate the structural validity of BARQ-R with Rasch analysis in community-dwelling Americans with and without musculoskeletal pain. Subaim: validate a Rasch analysis of BARQ-R done in Norwegian adults with musculoskeletal pain, through a secondary analysis in our sample of Americans with musculoskeletal pain. METHODS: BARQ-R has 12 items with scores ranging from 0 (completely disagree) to 3 (completely agree), with higher total scores reflecting lower degrees of body awareness. Through Rasch analysis, we evaluated unidimensionality, item hierarchy, and structural validity with item and person fit, targeting, person separation reliability (PSR), local item dependence (LID), differential item functioning (DIF), and principal components analysis of residuals (PCAR). RESULTS: We recruited 623 adults with and without musculoskeletal pain (average age = 50.27 ± 17.25 years). After rescoring 1 item and deleting 3 items, the 9-item Rasch-based BARQ-R had no misfitting items, the hierarchical ordering of the items followed clinical expectations, 3 (0.48%) misfitting persons, person mean location: -0.62 ± 1.03 logits (max -0.53, min 0.72 logits), minimal floor effect (1.93%) and ceiling effect (0.48%), no DIF, and PSR = 0.72. LID was found in 5 item pairs. The PCAR's eigenvalue was 2.18. The secondary Rasch analysis in 152 adults with musculoskeletal pain (average age = 52.26 ± 16.13 years), demonstrated that, after rescoring 2 items, BARQ-R had no misfitting items and only 2 (1.32%) misfitting persons, good targeting (person mean location: -0.36 ± 0.88 logits), minimal floor effect (0.01%), no ceiling effect (0.00%), and PSR = 0.75. LID was found in 6 item pairs. The PCAR's eigenvalue was 2.47. CONCLUSIONS: BARQ-R had good item and person fit. PSR with items covering a limited logit range suggests that differing levels of body awareness are measured with only modest precision. Adding and revising items to cover a wider range of body awareness and to better address concepts of internal body awareness and body movements would improve BARQ-R's utility. Further analyses are needed before BARQ-R's use for research or in the clinic. In addition, future BARQ-R Rasch validation is needed in other populations with body awareness deficits, such as stroke or spinal cord injury.

'Pain free if I ever will be': lived experience of workers seeking care for pain attributed to musculoskeletal disorders.

BACKGROUND: Pain attributed to musculoskeletal disorders are a significant hinderance to work ability and economic growth, especially in developing countries. Quality of life and lived experience of workers with musculoskeletal disorders have not been explored enough to determine whether person-centred care is provided. There is a wealth of evidence for using the biomedical approach in the management of workers with musculoskeletal disorders, which has proved ineffective in reducing absenteeism and symptoms experienced by workers. The purpose of this study was to explore the lived experience of workers seeking care for musculoskeletal disorders and how their pain attitudes and beliefs influenced their experience. METHODS: A qualitative approach with thematic analysis was used. Purposive sampling was used to recruit six participants for semi-structured interviews. All participants were either experiencing pain attributed to a musculoskeletal disorder or had received care for a musculoskeletal disorder. RESULTS: Pain attitudes and beliefs of workers with a musculoskeletal disorder and healthcare professionals greatly influenced the care and recovery process of musculoskeletal disorders. There is a primary biomedical lens informing care of workers with musculoskeletal disorders received. Workers expect healthcare professionals to explore their concerns further, but the focus of care for most participants was their presenting complaint. There is also a need for the autonomy of workers to be preserved, and communication between healthcare professionals and workers with musculoskeletal disorders needs to improve. CONCLUSIONS: Many stakeholders are involved in the recovery process from musculoskeletal disorders. There is a need for a biopsychosocial informed practice to improve return-to-work (RTW) in workers with musculoskeletal disorders. Change is needed at all healthcare system levels to reduce the negative experiences of workers and maladaptive pain beliefs that is associated with persisting symptoms and extended absenteeism.

The relationship between static and dynamic postural deformities with pain and quality of life in non-athletic women.

BACKGROUND: The assessment of the postural condition with functional tests are used with the least facilities in the shortest time, for a wide the range of movements for different parts of the body. Both static and dynamic posture measurements are predictive of injury. These two assessments provide different information regarding posture control. Also, with the advancement of this technology, the speed of posture assessment and deformity diagnosis can be increased and done with the minimum facilities. This can signal a new method for the quick diagnosis of abnormalities and ultimately prevent or correct psychological effects and musculoskeletal pain in the future. Because as seen according to the citations, abnormalities cause musculoskeletal pains, movement restrictions and ultimately affect the quality of life. METHODS: The current research is of the applied and semi-experimental type, and in terms of the results it is of the relational and correlational type. In this research, 148 non-Athletic women from Fardis City participated, in which the results obtained from the static evaluation was analyzed by the Posture Screen application after taking photos from four directions using a smartphone, and also the dynamic evaluation was identified and analyzed by the researcher using the overhead squat test of compensatory movements, with the data that from Cornell pain and quality of life SF-36 questionnaires was. Data description and correlation between variables were done with the η coefficient method. RESULTS: According to the findings there is a positive and significant correlation between the prevalence of uneven pelvic deformity and the amount of pain in non-athletic women (P = 0.036, η (148) = 0.17). In other words, pain increased significantly when the pelvis was changed from a normal position to a lateral deviation position. Also, there is a negative and significant relationship between the prevalence of deformity of knee movement, back arch, straight back, heel lift and the quality of life in non-athletic women (P = 0.020, η (148) = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: According to the results, deformities have an effect on pain and the frequency of pain, on the other hand, in the present study, dynamic evaluations showed deformities more accurately than static evaluations.

The feasibility and acceptability of using EMA and physiological data to measure day-to-day occupational stress, musculoskeletal pain and mental health.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of using EMA questionnaires and physiological data via wristbands to measure day-to-day occupational stress, musculoskeletal pain, and mental health among university employees (N = 23), across 10 work days. Adherence to the study protocol as well as participant experiences (via semi-structured interviews) with the protocol were used to assess feasibility and acceptability of the method. RESULTS: Adherence to the study protocol was excellent. Participants wore the wristband for a mean of 9.7 days. Participants completed a mean of 24.5 EMAs (out of 30). Semi-structured interviews with participants revealed that a small number of participants had difficulties uploading data from the wristband. The timing of EMAs was challenging for some participants, resulting in missed EMAs, raising questions about whether EMA frequency and timing could be changed to improve adherence. Some EMA items were difficult to answer due to the nature of participants' roles and the work undertaken. Overall, the protocol was feasible and acceptable but highlighted future potential changes including using a different physiological data collection tool, reducing the number of EMAs, adjusting EMA timings, and reviewing EMA items.

Medical Ozone as a Therapeutic Option in Musculoskeletal Pain Control: A Critical Review of Clinical Trials Considering Safety and Quality Indicators for Procedures and Devices.

Background: Drug therapies have been widely applied for pain management, however, there are important side effects such as those related to corticosteroids and opioids. Recent studies demonstrated promising results using medical ozone as a safe, effective, and low-cost intervention for pain control. Objective: to review and critically analyze clinical studies that used ozone therapy for musculoskeletal pain. Methods: a literature search of various databases was performed to identify relevant studies. From a total of 249 records, 27 studies were included. Quality indicators, human and device factors that strongly influence the generation of evidence were considered, such as study design and device safety. We also mitigated biases, considering the safety and efficacy of the intervention itself. Results: Regarding safety, 77 (8%) of studies reported no adverse effects; concerning efficacy outcomes, medical ozone shows to be an effective intervention on musculoskeletal pain control. Important information about used devices were missing. Conclusions: medical ozone shows to be safe and effective; qualification of health professionals as well as the device safety are mandatory. However, there is a lack of requirements to identify the best therapeutic scheme; further longer, clinical and rigorous trials are needed.

Musculoskeletal Pain and Right Leg Paresthesia Revealed as Large Ovarian Mucinous Cystadenoma: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND Epithelial neoplasms are the most common and heterogenous group of ovarian tumors. Approximately 10-15% are primary ovarian mucinous neoplasms. Almost 80% of these consist of benign mucinous neoplasms, while the rest are borderline neoplasms, non-invasive (intraepithelial and intraglandular) carcinomas, and invasive carcinomas. Small ovarian cystadenomas are generally asymptomatic and are mainly found incidentally during an ultrasound examination for another gynecologic disorder. As their size increases, nonspecific symptoms and clinical signs develop as a result of mass effect to adjacent structures or because of tumor torsion. The main clinical symptoms are abdominal and/or pelvic pain, fullness, and discomfort. Large cystadenomas have also been associated with nausea and vomiting, urinary problems, persistent cough, back pain, metrorrhagia, and feminization. CASE REPORT We report a case of a 31-year-old woman with a body mass index of 39 who presented with increasing sacrococcygeal pain and right leg paresthesia over a 2-year period. She was treated for possible musculoskeletal and spine problems. She was finally diagnosed with a large right ovarian mucinous cystadenoma expanding in the sacrococcygeal region. She was successfully treated with complete excision of the tumor and achieved complete remission of all her symptoms. CONCLUSIONS Large ovarian mucinous cystadenomas, which develop in the sacrococcygeal region, can lead to symptoms that mimic musculoskeletal and spine problems. Early diagnosis is of great importance towards the goal of implementing proper therapeutic approaches and achieve complete remission of all clinical symptoms.

What Is Plantar Fasciitis?

This JAMA Patient Page describes the condition of plantar fasciitis and its diagnosis and treatment.

Role of serum estradiol and C-telopeptide on musculoskeletal pain in menopausal women.

Musculoskeletal pain is one of the common symptoms of menopause syndrome throughout the world. Estradiol is the most potent and abundant derivative of estrogen and is associated with musculoskeletal pain, stiffness, and depressed mood during the menopausal transition. C-telopeptide is a molecule released during osteoclastic bone resorption and degradation of type I collagen, which is reported to have higher levels in individuals with musculoskeletal pain. An observational analytical study with a cross-sectional design was used in this research. Estradiol and C-telopeptide levels were measured in this study using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Musculoskeletal pain was assessed using the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ) and the Menopause Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL). Musculoskeletal pain was determined if the participant answered "yes" on questions number 12, 14 and 25 on the MENQOL. Data analysis was performed using the independent Student t-test for normally distributed data and the Mann-Whitney test for non-normally distributed data. A correlation test was performed using the Pearson correlation test for normally distributed data and the Spearman correlation test for non-normally distributed data. The results showed a non-significant relationship between estradiol and C-telopeptide levels with musculoskeletal pain assessed using the NMQ or MENQOL questionnaires. The correlation test also showed no correlation between estradiol and C-telopeptide levels in women with and without musculoskeletal pain.

Development of prediction model for risks of musculoskeletal chronic lumbopelvic pain in Indian women.

Chronic lumbopelvic pain (CLPP) and its associated disabilities significantly affect women's social, professional, and personal lives. However, the specific factors contributing to CLPP in women remain unclear. To address this gap, this prospective cross-sectional study aims to identify the risk factors predicting CLPP in women and develop a prediction model that can predict CLPP in women. The study was conducted across Delhi, India, where free health camps were held, and 2400 women were assessed. Among the assessed individuals, the study revealed a high prevalence rate of CLPP among Indian women, standing at 70.4%. Seven risk factors namely, hamstring muscle tightness (> 20° on passive knee extension test), increased lumbar lordosis (> 11.5 cm of the lumbar lordotic index), reduced hip flexibility (> 15 cm on bent knee fallout test), altered foot posture (≥ 20 on foot posture index score), increased perception of psychological stress (> 25 on cohen's perceived stress scale-10 score), reduced physical activity level (< 475 metabolic/minute on international physical activity questionnaire) and reduced performance of transversus abdominis muscle (≤ 5 on deep muscle contraction scale score) strongly predict the risks of CLPP in women. Identifying these risk factors is crucial for effectively preventing and managing CLPP symptoms, especially considering its high prevalence among Indian women. Health professionals should prioritize raising awareness about CLPP and its causative factors, as well as implementing strategies for early detection and intervention.

Examining the relationship between smartphone characteristics and the prevalence of hand discomfort among university students.

BACKGROUND: Students are among the groups that use smartphones for long periods throughout the day and night. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the relationship between smartphone characteristics and the prevalence of hand discomfort among university students. METHODS: This study included 204 university students, selected based on their willingness to participate and inclusion criteria. Participants reported hand pain and discomfort by completing the Cornell Hand Discomfort Questionnaire (CHDQ). Personal information was collected through a demographic questionnaire. Smartphone characteristics were obtained from the Internet based on the smartphone model self-reported by students. RESULTS: According to the Cornell questionnaire, 59.3% of students reported experiencing discomfort in their right hand, while 38.2% reported discomfort in their left hand due to smartphone use. Furthermore, 36.3% of students reported experiencing pain in two or more regions on their right hand, while 20.1% reported pain in two or more areas on their left hand. More than half of the students in the right hand (53.5%) and more than one-third (33.3%) in the left hand obtained pain scores of more than 1.5. The chi-square test indicated a statistically significant relationship between the weight of the smartphone and the prevalence of discomfort in the right hand (χ2 = 4.80, p = 0.03). Furthermore, a statistically significant relationship was found between the discomfort or pain scores experienced in both hands and the number of painful areas in those hands (right hand: χ2 = 219.04, p = 0.00; left hand: χ2 = 213.13, p = 0.00). CONCLUSIONS: Smartphone use can cause discomfort and pain in the hands of university students. The physical characteristics of the smartphone, such as its weight, play a significant role in contributing to right-hand-related pain among students. It is important to consider ergonomic factors in smartphone design and usage to reduce musculoskeletal problems among users, especially students.

Association between persistent musculoskeletal pain and incident sarcopenia in China: the mediating effect of depressive symptoms.

Objective: To evaluate the association between musculoskeletal pain and incident sarcopenia and further explore the mediating effect of depressive symptoms among middle-aged and older Chinese adults. Methods: Using the data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study 2011 and 2015, we included 12,788 participants in the cross-sectional analysis and 8,322 for the longitudinal analysis. Musculoskeletal pains located in the neck, back, waist, shoulder, arm, wrist, leg, knee, and ankle were self-reported at baseline and follow-up. The diagnosis criteria of sarcopenia was based on the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between musculoskeletal pain, and the Karlson-Holm-Breen (KHB) method was used to explore the mediating effect of depressive symptoms. Results: Over the 4-year follow-up, 445 participants were identified with incident sarcopenia. In the longitudinal analysis, participants with baseline musculoskeletal pain (adjusted odds ratio (OR): 1.37, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07-1.76), persistent musculoskeletal pain (OR:1.68, 95%CI: 1.28-2.24), and persistent waist pain (OR:1.46, 95%CI: 1.04-2.03) were significantly associated with increased the risk of incident sarcopenia. Furthermore, depressive symptoms were found to partially mediate the association between musculoskeletal pain and incident sarcopenia. Conclusion: Persistent musculoskeletal pain, especially in waist area, was positively associated with a higher risk of sarcopenia among the middle-aged and older Chinese. Depressive symptoms played a partial mediating role in this association.

The impact of COVID-19 infection on musculoskeletal pain and its associating factors: a cross-sectional study.

Objectives: Musculoskeletal pain after COVID-19 infection remains a concerning long-term complication of COVID-19. Here, our study aimed to investigate the prevalence of musculoskeletal pain associated with COVID-19 (MSPC) and healthcare-seeking behaviors, as well as the associating factors. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted using convenience sampling and distributed to participants anonymously through the online platform Credamo. Demographic and characteristic data of the participants were collected and analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was employed to investigate potential factors associated with MSPC and healthcare-seeking tendencies. Results: A total of 1,510 participants responded to the survey, with 42.6% (643 individuals) exhibiting MSPC. Higher education level and a greater number of concomitant symptoms were significant risk factors for MSPC, while longer exercise duration and higher PSS-10 scores were protective factors. Additionally, higher income level, frequency and severity of pain, and greater PSS-10 scores increased healthcare-seeking intention. Conclusion: A significant proportion of individuals experience MSPC. Education level and concomitant symptoms were risk factors for MSPC, while exercise duration and PSS-10 score were potential protective factors. Income level, frequency and severity of pain, and PSS-10 score are significantly related to the willingness to seek medical treatment for MSPC.

The impact of chiropractic care on prescription opioid use for non-cancer spine pain: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: In recent studies, receipt of chiropractic care has been associated with lower odds of receiving prescription opioids and, among those already prescribed, reduced doses of opioids among patients with non-cancer spine pain. These findings suggest that access to chiropractic services may reduce reliance on opioids for musculoskeletal pain. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of chiropractic care on initiation, or continued use, of prescription opioids among patients with non-cancer spine pain. METHODS: We will search for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies indexed in MEDLINE, Embase, AMED, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Index to Chiropractic Literature from database inception to June 2024. Article screening, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment will be conducted independently by pairs of reviewers. We will conduct separate analyses for RCTs and observational studies and pool binary outcomes (e.g. prescribed opioid receipt, long-term opioid use, and higher versus lower opioid dose) as odds ratios (ORs) with associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs). When studies provide hazard ratios (HRs) or relative risks (RRs) for time-to-event data (e.g. time-to-first opioid prescription) or incidence rates (number of opioid prescriptions over time), we will first convert them to an OR before pooling. Continuous outcomes such as pain intensity, sleep quality, or morphine equivalent dose will be pooled as weighted mean differences with associated 95% CIs. We will conduct meta-analyses using random-effects models and explore sources of heterogeneity using subgroup analyses and meta-regression. We will evaluate the certainty of evidence of all outcomes using the GRADE approach and the credibility of all subgroup effects with ICEMAN criteria. Our systematic review will follow the PRISMA statement and MOOSE guidelines. DISCUSSION: Our review will establish the current evidence informing the impact of chiropractic care on new or continued prescription opioid use for non-cancer spine pain. We will disseminate our results through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations. The findings of our review will be of interest to patients, health care providers, and policy-makers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42023432277.

Most physical interventions for musculoskeletal pain in children and adolescents cannot be reproduced in clinical practice: a meta-research study of randomized clinical trials.

INTRODUCTION: Conservative treatments such as physical therapies are usually the most indicated for the management of musculoskeletal pain; therefore, a detailed description of interventions enables the reproducibility of interventions in clinical practice and future research. The objective of this study is to evaluate the description of physical interventions for musculoskeletal pain in children and adolescents. METHODS: We considered randomized controlled trials that included children and adolescents between 4 and 19 years old with acute or chronic/persistent musculoskeletal pain. We included physical therapies related to all types of physical modalities aimed at reducing the intensity of pain or disability in children and adolescents with musculoskeletal pain. The description of interventions was assessed using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist. We performed electronic searches in the following databases: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsyINFO and PEDro up to April 2024. The description of physical interventions was presented using frequencies, percentages and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the TIDieR checklist items described in each study. We also calculated the total TIDieR score for each study and presented these data as mean and standard deviation. RESULTS: We included 17 randomized controlled trials. The description measured through the TIDieR checklist scored an average of 11 (5.2) points out of 24. The item of the TIDieR that was most described was item 1 (brief name) and most absent was item 10 (modifications). CONCLUSION: The descriptions of physical interventions for the treatment of musculoskeletal pain in children and adolescents are partially described, indicating the need for strategies to improve the quality of description to enable true clinical reproducibility.

Prevalencia de desórdenes musculoesqueléticos y riesgo ergonómico en cirujanos de cabeza y cuello: Revisión sistemática y metaanálisis / Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders and ergonomic risk in head and neck surgeons: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Introducción. Las lesiones musculoesqueléticas traen consecuencias en los profesionales quirúrgicos, y más aún en cirujanos de cabeza y cuello, que conllevan gran carga de discapacidad y ausentismo laboral, ocasionando retiro temprano, restricciones o modificaciones en la práctica quirúrgica. Métodos. Se seleccionaron publicaciones de las bases de datos Pubmed, Embase y LILACS. Se incluyeron todos los estudios que midieron la prevalencia de lesiones musculoesqueléticas y la presencia de riesgo ergonómico, síntomas asociados, uso de escalas de medición y estrategias de prevención. Los efectos estimados de los estudios se mostraron con intervalo de confianza del 95 %. Resultados. Se encontraron 438 estudios. Después de la revisión, se incluyeron 7 estudios, con un total de 868 pacientes. Se estimó mediante un metaanálisis de efectos aleatorios una prevalencia del 81 %. Conclusiones. Los problemas posturales en cirujanos de cabeza y cuello tienen una prevalencia de 81 %. Esto genera un gran impacto en su salud física y mental, aumentando las incapacidades y pérdida de años laborales. Las herramientas utilizadas para la evaluación son heterogéneas y algunos estudios no incluyen datos como los años de práctica y el nivel de entrenamiento.

Introduction. Musculoskeletal injuries have consequences for surgical professionals, and even more so for head and neck surgeons, which entail a large burden of disability and absenteeism from work, causing early retirement, restrictions or modifications in surgical practice. Methods. Publications were selected from the Pubmed, Embase and LILACS databases. All studies that measured the prevalence of musculoskeletal injuries and the presence of ergonomic risk, associated symptoms, use of measurement scales and prevention strategies were included. The estimated effects of the studies were shown with a 95% confidence interval. Results. 438 studies were found. After the review, seven studies were included, with a total of 868 patients. A prevalence of 81% was estimated through a random effects meta-analysis. Conclusions. Postural problems in head and neck surgeons have a prevalence of 81%. This generates a great impact on their physical and mental health, increasing disabilities and loss of working years. The tools used for evaluation are heterogeneous and some studies do not include data such as years of practice and level of training.

Osteopathic manipulation and its applicability in the emergency department: A narrative review.

BACKGROUND: Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT), also known as osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM), is a set of manual techniques, developed by Dr. Andrew Taylor Still, founder of osteopathic medicine, initially limited to osteopathic medicine, for the treatment of painful conditions. This toolset is now used by allopathic physicians, international osteopaths, physical therapists, chiropractors, and other healthcare workers for the treatment of musculoskeletal pain. OMT can be used in the emergency department (ED) for the treatment of musculoskeletal complaints as an adjunct to pharmacologic agents (e.g., NSAIDs), or an alternative to opioids. OBJECTIVE: This narrative review provides emergency clinicians with an understanding of OMT, including a broad overview of the basis, development, and common subtypes of OMT; data on OMT efficacy and on the use of conditions commonly encountered in the ED setting; and information on how to implement the use of OMT in emergency medicine and urgent care settings. DISCUSSION: OMT can be used for a wide variety of acute and chronic pain conditions, particularly back pain, headaches, neck pain, and extremity pain (assuming that life-threatening conditions have been excluded). There are small studies and case series demonstrating both efficacy and subjective improvement with OMT, including in the ED. However, limitations to the current body of literature include: small numbers of patients, challenges with blinding and standardization, limited adverse event reporting, and most research has been outside of the ED setting. There is great opportunity for future studies and application of OMT in the ED. There are an increasing number of emergency clinicians incorporating OMT in their practice and despite the perception of OMT requiring extended periods of time to perform, current data suggests OMT does not prolong ED visits or cost to patients. OMT is a procedure with billing codes, and courses and training in OMT are available for both osteopathic and allopathic physicians. CONCLUSION: OMT is being used and has great potential in the management of acute and chronic musculoskeletal pain in the ED in addition to, or instead of pharmacologic agents, in particular as an opioid-sparing option.

Immersive and Nonimmersive Virtual Reality-Assisted Active Training in Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Virtual reality (VR) in different immersive conditions has been increasingly used as a nonpharmacological method for managing chronic musculoskeletal pain. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the effectiveness of VR-assisted active training versus conventional exercise or physiotherapy in chronic musculoskeletal pain and to analyze the effects of immersive versus nonimmersive VR on pain outcomes. METHODS: This systematic review of randomized control trials (RCTs) searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from inception to June 9, 2024. RCTs comparing adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain receiving VR-assisted training were included. The primary outcome was pain intensity; secondary outcomes included functional disability and kinesiophobia. Available data were pooled in a meta-analysis. Studies were graded using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool version 2. RESULTS: In total, 28 RCTs including 1114 participants with some concerns for a high risk of bias were identified, and 25 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. In low back pain, short-term outcomes measured post intervention showed that nonimmersive VR is effective in reducing pain (standardized mean difference [SMD] -1.79, 95% CI -2.72 to -0.87; P<.001), improving disability (SMD -0.44, 95% CI -0.72 to -0.16; P=.002), and kinesiophobia (SMD -2.94, 95% CI -5.20 to -0.68; P=.01). Intermediate-term outcomes measured at 6 months also showed that nonimmersive VR is effective in reducing pain (SMD -8.15, 95% CI -15.29 to -1.01; P=.03), and kinesiophobia (SMD -4.28, 95% CI -8.12 to -0.44; P=.03) compared to conventional active training. For neck pain, immersive VR reduced pain intensity (SMD -0.55, 95% CI -1.02 to -0.08; P=.02) but not disability and kinesiophobia in the short term. No statistical significances were detected for knee pain or other pain regions at all time points. In addition, 2 (8%) studies had a high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: Both nonimmersive and immersive VR-assisted active training is effective in reducing back and neck pain symptoms. Our study findings suggest that VR is effective in alleviating chronic musculoskeletal pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022302912; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=302912.

Pain intensity scales: A cross-sectional study on the preferences and knowledge of physiotherapists and participants with musculoskeletal pain.

BACKGROUND: Subjective pain intensity can be measured using instruments like the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R), Verbal Rating Scale (VRS), Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). However, information on physiotherapists' and patients' knowledge and preference for these tools is scarce. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the knowledge and preference of physiotherapists and participants with musculoskeletal pain (MP) regarding the pain intensity measurement scales. METHODS: This cross-sectional study consisted of physiotherapists and participants with MP. Physiotherapists were recruited via social media for an online open survey, gathering sociodemographic, professional data, and their knowledge and preferences for pain intensity scales. Participants over 18 with MP, participated in interviews focusing on their familiarity and preferences for pain intensity scales. Data was analyzed descriptively, and Chi-squared test evaluated scale preferences. RESULTS: We included 352 physiotherapists (mean experience = 10.5 years) and 94 participants with MP. Of the physiotherapists, 94.3% were familiar with pain scales, but 30.4% struggled to differentiate them. The NPRS was the most used (56.3%) and preferred scale (52.4%). Among participants with MP, unfamiliarity was noted with all scales. After instruction, 46% preferred FPS-R, with preference varying by income and education levels (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: We found a knowledge gap among physiotherapists in identifying pain intensity scales, with a preference for the NPRS among those familiar with the scales. Participants with MP had limited familiarity with these scales. After instructions, these participants preferred the FPS-R, particularly those with lower income and education levels.

Comparison of ultrasound- vs. landmark-guided injections for musculoskeletal pain: an umbrella review.

OBJECTIVE: This umbrella review synthesizes systematic reviews and meta-analyses to reach a conclusion concerning the overall effectiveness of ultrasound-guided vs landmark-guided injections for treating musculoskeletal pain. DESIGN: Umbrella review. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Web of Science were searched for relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses from inception to March 2024. Critical appraisal, data extraction, and synthesis were performed in accordance with the criteria for conducting an umbrella review. RESULTS: Seventeen articles, comprising 4 systematic reviews and 13 meta-analyses, were included. Using the AMSTAR2 instrument for quality assessment, 3 articles were rated as high quality, 1 as moderate, 7 as low, and 6 as critically low. Generally, ultrasound-guided injections were found to be more accurate than landmark-guided injections, particularly in the shoulder joint, though the results for pain relief and functional outcomes varied. Ultrasound guidance was notably effective for injections into the bicipital groove, wrist, hip, and knee - yielding greater accuracy and improved pain management. Both ultrasound-guided and landmark-guided techniques showed low incidence of adverse effects. CONCLUSION: This umbrella review offers an in-depth analysis of the comparative effectiveness of ultrasound-guided and landmark-guided injections across a range of musculoskeletal sites/conditions. The findings suggest that ultrasound-guided is a reliable method.

Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia in people with chronic musculoskeletal pain. A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.

The aims were (i) to determine the effects of Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) on sleep disturbances, pain intensity and disability in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP), and (ii) to determine the dose-response association between CBT-I dose (total minutes) and improvements in sleep disorders, pain intensity and disability in patients with CMP. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, and SCOPUS until December 17, 2023. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) using CBT-I without co-interventions in people with CMP and sleep disorders were eligible. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias and certainty of the evidence. A random effects meta-analysis was applied to determine the effects on the variables of interest. The dose-response association was assessed using a restricted cubic spline model. Eleven RCTs (n = 1801 participants) were included. We found a significant effect in favor of CBT-I for insomnia (SMD: -1.34; 95%CI: -2.12 to -0.56), with a peak effect size at 450 min of CBT-I (-1.65, 95%CI: -1.89 to -1.40). A non-significant effect was found for pain intensity. A meta-analysis of disability was not possible due to the lack of data. This review found benefits of CBT-I for insomnia compared to control interventions, with a large effect size. In addition, it was estimated that a 250-min dose of CBT-I had a large effect on reducing insomnia and that the peak effect was reached at 450 min. These novel findings may guide clinicians in optimizing the use of CBT-I in people with CMP and insomnia.