Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 835
Filter
1.
World J Gastroenterol ; 30(29): 3461-3464, 2024 Aug 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39156501

ABSTRACT

Achalasia can significantly impair the quality of life. The clinical presentation typically includes dysphagia to both solids and liquids, chest pain, and regurgitation. Diagnosis can be delayed in patients with atypical presentations, and they might receive a wrong diagnosis, such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), owing to overlapping symptoms of both disorders. Although the cause of achalasia is poorly understood, its impact on the motility of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction is well established. Several treatment modalities have been utilized, with the most common being surgical Heller myotomy with concomitant fundoplication and pneumatic balloon dilatation. Recently, peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has gained popularity as an effective treatment for achalasia, despite a relatively high incidence of GERD occurring after treatment compared to other modalities. The magnitude of post-POEM GERD depends on its definition and is influenced by patient and procedure-related factors. The long-term sequelae of post-POEM GERD are yet to be determined, but it appears to have a benign course and is usually manageable with clinically available modalities. Identifying risk factors for post-POEM GERD and modifying the POEM procedure in selected patients may improve the overall success of this technique.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Achalasia , Gastroesophageal Reflux , Esophageal Achalasia/surgery , Esophageal Achalasia/diagnosis , Humans , Gastroesophageal Reflux/etiology , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Gastroesophageal Reflux/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Risk Factors , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/adverse effects , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Heller Myotomy/adverse effects , Heller Myotomy/methods , Fundoplication/adverse effects , Fundoplication/methods , Quality of Life , Myotomy/methods , Myotomy/adverse effects , Esophagoscopy/methods , Esophagoscopy/adverse effects , Esophagus/surgery
2.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(32): e38970, 2024 Aug 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39121306

ABSTRACT

Achalasia, a rare esophageal motility disorder characterized by the inability of the lower esophageal sphincter to relax and loss of esophageal peristalsis, significantly impacts pediatric patient quality of life through symptoms like dysphagia, chest pain, and weight loss. This nationwide retrospective cohort study evaluates the efficacy and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for pediatric achalasia in Mongolia, contributing to the limited global data on this minimally invasive treatment in children. Conducted between February 2020 and March 2022 at 2 tertiary centers, the study included symptomatic achalasia patients, treatment-naive or those with unsatisfactory outcomes from previous esophageal dilations. The POEM procedure was assessed for its impact on esophageal structure and function, symptom severity via the Eckardt score, and procedure-related safety, with outcomes measured at baseline, 3 days, and 12 months post-procedure. The study demonstrated notable post-procedure improvements across all measured outcomes: abnormal contraction length and esophageal width significantly reduced, underscoring the procedure's effectiveness. More precisely, the integrated relaxation pressure showed a significant improvement from a mean of 26.8 mm Hg (standard deviation [SD], 5.4 mm Hg) pre-procedure to 10.8 mm Hg (SD, 1.1 mm Hg) 12 months (P < .001). Similarly, Eckardt scores, which assess symptom severity, improved significantly from a pre-procedure mean of 7.0 (SD, 1.0) to a substantially lower score post-procedure (P < .001), reflecting enhanced patient quality of life and symptom alleviation. This study underscores POEM's role as an effective, minimally invasive option for pediatric achalasia management within the Mongolian population, offering significant symptomatic relief and improved esophageal function.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Achalasia , Myotomy , Humans , Esophageal Achalasia/surgery , Male , Child , Female , Retrospective Studies , Adolescent , Myotomy/methods , Myotomy/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Child, Preschool , Quality of Life , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/adverse effects , Esophagoscopy/methods , Esophagoscopy/adverse effects
3.
N Z Med J ; 137(1601): 48-54, 2024 Aug 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39173161

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a recognised treatment for achalasia, with the accepted approach involving admission for imaging and dietary progression. However, recent publications suggest same-day discharge (SDD) may be possible, which could be time and cost-saving. We sought to investigate the safety of SDD following POEM. METHODS: Fifty consecutive POEMs at two referral centres in New Zealand were performed between 2020-2023. All patients were planned for early dietary introduction and were eligible for SDD if symptoms were managed. Analgesia was available in recovery and supplied at discharge. Imaging and endoscopy were performed only if there were clinical concerns. Rates of discharge clearance, discharge, complications and re-admission were analysed. RESULTS: All 50 POEMs were technically successful. A total of 41/50 (82%) received clearance for SDD. Additionally, 35/50 (70%) achieved discharge and 6/50 (12%) were observed overnight for social reasons, including lack of transport to the referring domicile. Of the patients not cleared for SDD, 7/9 (78%) were discharged within 24 hours, and the others after 48 and 72 hours. Procedural complications were recorded in three patients (6%), with one requiring endoscopic assessment and clipping. There were two re-admissions (4%), both lt;24-hour hospital stays, and managed medically. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients achieved same-day discharge clearance (82%) and 96% required less than 24 hours hospital stay. Complication and re-admission rates were low overall. We have demonstrated that POEM can be an SDD procedure facilitated by early dietary introduction and liberal analgesia, without the need for routine imaging or endoscopy.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Achalasia , Feasibility Studies , Patient Discharge , Humans , Male , Esophageal Achalasia/surgery , Female , Middle Aged , New Zealand , Adult , Aged , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Myotomy/methods , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data
5.
Turk J Gastroenterol ; 35(3): 186-192, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39128099

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIMS:  This retrospective single-center study aimed to assess the safety of early feeding in patients who met certain criteria following peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). MATERIALS AND METHODS:  Data from 100 patients who underwent POEM at our center between January and December 2022 were collected. Early feeding was defined as the introduction of clear liquid foods at 4 hours post procedure. At 4 and 24 hours, the pain was rated using the visual analog scale (VAS) in all patients. Patients without intraoperative complications (pneumoperitoneum requiring needle drainage, severe arterial bleeding requiring the use of hemostatic forceps, severe mucosal injury) and severe pain (VAS score > 6) and nausea-vomiting at the fourth postoperative hour were given the early feeding approach. In patients who did not meet these requirements, enteral feeding was initiated after 24 hours (late feeding). RESULTS:  Among the 100 patients, 50 patients were categorized early feeding. No patients had a control esophagogram. In the early and late enteral feeding groups, VAS scores were 4 (0-6) and 6 (1-8) (P< 001) at 4 hours and 1 (0-3) and 1 (0-6) (P = .043) at 24 hours, respectively. No severe complications were developed after early feeding. The median hospital stay in the early feeding group was 1 (1-3) day. There was no emergency readmission in any of early feeding patients. CONCLUSION:  Our study showed early feeding following POEM can be begun in achalasia patients who do not have intraoperative complications, severe pain, or nausea/vomiting.


Subject(s)
Enteral Nutrition , Esophageal Achalasia , Humans , Esophageal Achalasia/surgery , Female , Retrospective Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Adult , Enteral Nutrition/methods , Enteral Nutrition/adverse effects , Tertiary Care Centers , Myotomy/methods , Myotomy/adverse effects , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Aged , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/adverse effects , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Pain Measurement , Postoperative Care/methods , Young Adult
6.
World J Gastroenterol ; 30(22): 2834-2838, 2024 Jun 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38947293

ABSTRACT

This editorial is an analysis the review article by Nabi et al recently published in this journal. Achalasia Cardia is a disease whose pathophysiology is still unclear. It is known that there is inflammation of unknown aetiology leading to loss of ganglion cells in the muscularis propria. The end result is lower oesophageal sphincter spasm, loss of receptive relaxation, decreased oesophageal peristalsis, all leading on to varying degrees of dysphagia. The treatment of this condition is palliative in nature, performed by myotomy of the lower oesophagus either surgically or endoscopically. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been associated with the myotomy performed, particularly with the Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) procedure. Nabi et al have provided an excellent overview of the latest developments in predicting, preventing, evaluating, and managing GERD subsequent to POEM. Based on this theme, this review article explores the concept of using histology of the oesophageal muscle layer, to grade the disease and thereby help tailoring the length/type of myotomy performed during the POEM procedure. In the future, will a histology based algorithm available preoperatively, help modify the POEM procedure, thereby decreasing the incidence of GERD associated with POEM?


Subject(s)
Esophageal Achalasia , Esophageal Sphincter, Lower , Gastroesophageal Reflux , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery , Humans , Esophageal Achalasia/surgery , Esophageal Achalasia/physiopathology , Esophageal Achalasia/diagnosis , Esophageal Sphincter, Lower/surgery , Esophageal Sphincter, Lower/physiopathology , Esophagoscopy/methods , Esophagoscopy/adverse effects , Gastroesophageal Reflux/surgery , Gastroesophageal Reflux/etiology , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Myotomy/methods , Myotomy/adverse effects , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/adverse effects , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Pyloromyotomy/adverse effects , Pyloromyotomy/methods , Treatment Outcome
8.
World J Gastroenterol ; 30(23): 2947-2953, 2024 Jun 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38946871

ABSTRACT

In this editorial, we respond to a review article by Nabi et al, in which the authors discussed gastroesophageal reflux (GER) following peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). POEM is presently the primary therapeutic option for achalasia, which is both safe and effective. A few adverse effects were documented after POEM, including GER. The diagnostic criteria were not clear enough because approximately 60% of patients have a long acid exposure time, while only 10% experience reflux symptoms. Multiple predictors of high disease incidence have been identified, including old age, female sex, obesity, and a baseline lower esophageal sphincter pressure of less than 45 mmHg. Some technical steps during the procedure, such as a lengthy or full-thickness myotomy, may further enhance the risk. Proton pump inhibitors are currently the first line of treatment. Emerging voices are increasingly advocating for the routine combining of POEM with an endoscopic fundoplication method, such as peroral endoscopic fundoplication or transoral incisionless fundoplication. However, more research is necessary to determine the safety and effectiveness of these procedures in the long term for patients who have undergone them.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Achalasia , Fundoplication , Gastroesophageal Reflux , Myotomy , Proton Pump Inhibitors , Humans , Esophageal Achalasia/surgery , Esophageal Achalasia/diagnosis , Esophageal Achalasia/physiopathology , Esophageal Sphincter, Lower/surgery , Esophageal Sphincter, Lower/physiopathology , Esophagoscopy/adverse effects , Esophagoscopy/methods , Fundoplication/methods , Fundoplication/adverse effects , Gastroesophageal Reflux/surgery , Gastroesophageal Reflux/etiology , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Myotomy/methods , Myotomy/adverse effects , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/adverse effects , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
10.
BMJ Open Gastroenterol ; 11(1)2024 Jun 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38844375

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a standard treatment option for achalasia patients. Treatment response varies due to factors such as achalasia type, degree of dilatation, pressure and distensibility indices. We present an innovative approach for treatment response prediction based on an automatic three-dimensional (3-D) reconstruction of the tubular oesophagus (TE) and the lower oesophageal sphincter (LES) in patients undergoing POEM for achalasia. METHODS: A software was developed, integrating data from high-resolution manometry, timed barium oesophagogram and endoscopic images to automatically generate 3-D reconstructions of the TE and LES. Novel normative indices for TE (volume×pressure) and LES (volume/pressure) were automatically integrated, facilitating pre-POEM and post-POEM comparisons. Treatment response was evaluated by changes in volumetric and pressure indices for the TE and the LES before as well as 3 and 12 months after POEM. In addition, these values were compared with normal value indices of non-achalasia patients. RESULTS: 50 treatment-naive achalasia patients were enrolled prospectively. The mean TE index decreased significantly (p<0.0001) and the mean LES index increased significantly 3 months post-POEM (p<0.0001). In the 12-month follow-up, no further significant change of value indices between 3 and 12 months post-POEM was seen. 3 months post-POEM mean LES index approached the mean LES of the healthy control group (p=0.077). CONCLUSION: 3-D reconstruction provides an interactive, dynamic visualisation of the oesophagus, serving as a comprehensive tool for evaluating treatment response. It may contribute to refining our approach to achalasia treatment and optimising treatment outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 22-0149.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Achalasia , Esophageal Sphincter, Lower , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Manometry , Humans , Esophageal Achalasia/surgery , Male , Female , Manometry/methods , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Adult , Esophageal Sphincter, Lower/surgery , Esophageal Sphincter, Lower/physiopathology , Prospective Studies , Aged , Esophagus/surgery , Esophagoscopy/methods , Myotomy/methods , Software , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Young Adult
12.
A A Pract ; 18(6): e01799, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38842199

ABSTRACT

In tracheobronchomalacia, the structural weakening of the airway results in altered ventilatory mechanics. This case report describes a patient with known tracheobronchomalacia who experienced expiratory central airway collapse and dynamic pulmonary hyperinflation during peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) to treat symptomatic achalasia. We discuss the physiological considerations and potential complications of a POEM procedure with superimposed tracheobronchomalacia and present perioperative strategies for the prevention and management of this potentially deleterious combination. Although tracheobronchomalacia was a known condition in our patient, it is likely an underdiagnosed condition that may first present intraoperatively.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Achalasia , Myotomy , Humans , Middle Aged , Esophageal Achalasia/surgery , Myotomy/methods , Tracheobronchomalacia/surgery
14.
Surg Endosc ; 38(8): 4686-4694, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38849652

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although myotomy is crucial in peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) surgeries, its optimum length remains controversial. Herein, we propose a modified POEM with new method of tailoring myotomy length aim to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and clinical outcomes of this modified POEM compared with standard POEM in type I or II achalasia. METHODS: Seventy-five patients with type I or II achalasia who underwent POEM at the First Hospital of Jilin University between January 2018 and December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the myotomy approach, these patients were divided into the retrograde on-demand myotomy (RDM, n = 34), with myotomy beginning on gastric side and length tailored by determining the degree of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) distention, and standard myotomy (SM, n = 41) groups. The baseline data, myotomy length, operation time, clinical success rate, adverse event rate, and reflux-related adverse events were compared and analyzed. RESULTS: The median myotomy length in the RDM group was significantly shorter than that in the SM group (6 vs. 8 cm, respectively; p < 0.001). Moreover, the median myotomy time in the RDM group was significantly shorter than that in the SM group (10 vs. 16 min, respectively; p < 0.001). POEM was successfully performed in all the patients. At the 2-year follow-up, high clinical success rates were observed in both the RDM and SM groups (92.0% vs. 93.3%, respectively; p = 1.000). The incidence of intraoperative adverse events and postoperative reflux-related adverse events was low and comparable in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: RDM POEM is a safe and effective method for patients with type I or II achalasia. Furthermore, it has a shorter myotomy length and operation time than standard POEM technique.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Achalasia , Myotomy , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery , Humans , Esophageal Achalasia/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Adult , Myotomy/methods , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Treatment Outcome , Operative Time , Aged , Esophageal Sphincter, Lower/surgery , Esophagoscopy/methods
15.
Surg Endosc ; 38(8): 4543-4549, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38937313

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To explore the feasibility of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in patients with achalasia and hiatal hernia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 2136 patients with achalasia between January 2016 and December 2022. Patients with achalasia and hiatal hernia were assigned into study group, and matched patients with achalasia but no hiatal hernia were assigned into control group. The preoperative baseline information, procedure-related adverse events (AEs) and follow-up data were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Hiatal hernia was identified in 56/1564 (3.6%) patients with achalasia. All of these patients underwent POEM with success. The preoperative baseline characteristics were similar between the study and control group. The study group presented with a similar rate of mucosal injury (12.5% vs 16.1, P = 0.589), pneumothorax (3.6% vs 1.8%, P = 1.000), pleural effusion (8.9% vs 12.5%, P = 0.541) and major AEs (1.8% vs 1.8%, P = 1.000) compared with the control group. As for the follow-up data, no significant differences were observed in clinical success (96.4% vs 92.9%, P = 0.679; 93.6% vs 94.0%, P = 1.000; 86.5% vs 91.4%, P = 0.711) clinical reflux (25.0% vs 19.6%, P = 0.496; 31.9% vs 26.0%, P = 0.521; 35.1% vs 31.4%, P = 0.739) and proton pump inhibitor usage (17.9% vs 16.1%, P = 0.801; 29.8% vs 24.0%, P = 0.520; 32.4% vs 25.7%, P = 0.531) between the study group and control group at 1-year, 2-year and 3-year follow-ups. CONCLUSIONS: POEM is a safe and effective treatment for achalasia combined with hiatal hernia.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Achalasia , Hernia, Hiatal , Myotomy , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery , Humans , Esophageal Achalasia/surgery , Esophageal Achalasia/complications , Hernia, Hiatal/surgery , Hernia, Hiatal/complications , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Adult , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Treatment Outcome , Myotomy/methods , Feasibility Studies , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Aged , Esophagoscopy/methods
18.
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol ; 48(7): 102401, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38897558

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the impact of the depth of myotomy (selective inner layer myotomy (SIM) vs. full-thickness myotomy (FTM)) on the outcome of patients treated with POEM for achalasia. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational, conducted in two tertiary centers between October 2018 and September 2022. Patients were divided into two groups: SIM and FTM. The primary endpoint was clinical efficacy at 6 months, while secondary endpoints were postoperative criteria (such as pain, length of hospital stay, complications) and occurrence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (esophagitis at 6 months, heartburn, and pH-metry). RESULTS: 158 patients were included in the study (33 in the FTM group and 125 in the SIM group). The success rates at 6 and 12 months were similar in both groups, with 84 % and 70 % in the SIM group versus 90 % and 80 % in the FTM group, respectively (p = 0.57 and p = 0.74). However, more opioid analgesics were consumed in the FTM group compared to the SIM group (41% vs 21 %, p < 0.01). The length of hospitalization was longer in the FTM group than in the SIM group (2.17 ± 2.62 vs 2.94 ± 2.33, p < 0.001). The rate of esophagitis at 6 months was comparable (16 % in the SIM group vs 12 % in the FTM group, p = 0.73). There was no significant difference in terms of heartburn at 6 or 12 months between the SIM and FTM groups (18.5% vs 3.8 %, p = 0.07 and 27% vs 12.5 %, p = 0.35, respectively). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in terms of clinical efficacy and GERD occurrence between FTM and SIM. However, full-thickness myotomy was associated with more postoperative pain and a longer length of hospital stay. Therefore, selective internal myotomy should be preferred over full-thickness myotomy.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Achalasia , Pain, Postoperative , Humans , Esophageal Achalasia/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Treatment Outcome , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Myotomy/methods , Aged , Gastroesophageal Reflux/surgery
19.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 49(9): 102691, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38857665

ABSTRACT

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) with left ventricular outflow tract obstruction that doesn't improve with pharmacological management often requires septal myectomy. However, there are few centers with experience in the practice of this procedure in our country. We describe the clinical and echocardiographic characteristics and postoperative outcomes of patients with HCM indicated for septal myectomy at a reference center in Colombia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study. Patients undergoing septal myectomy between 2010 and 2023 were included. Data were collected before and two years after surgery. RESULTS: 18 patients were included. The mean age was 50 years. The predominant functional class was NYHA II/III (94 %). Asymmetric septal variant (83.3 %) was the most frequent as well as obstructive phenotype (88.8 %). After myectomy, 70.5 % improved to NYHA I and 62.4 % had no significant gradient (<30 mmHg), and the most of patient improved SAM. One patient died post-procedure, anymore complications were presented. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: Septal myectomy is a safe procedure, with clinical and echocardiographic improvement, with low complication rates.


Subject(s)
Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic , Echocardiography , Heart Septum , Humans , Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic/surgery , Middle Aged , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Heart Septum/surgery , Heart Septum/diagnostic imaging , Treatment Outcome , Echocardiography/methods , Adult , Ventricular Outflow Obstruction/surgery , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/methods , Colombia/epidemiology , Aged , Myotomy/methods
20.
Surg Endosc ; 38(7): 3503-3519, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38782829

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an emerging effective treatment for achalasia. However, a significant proportion of patients do not respond well to the treatment. After over a decade of clinical practice, potential risk factors associated with POEM failure have been identified. This meta-analysis aimed to summarize the evidence of risk factors for POEM failure. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from inception to June 10th, 2022. We included English studies that reported POEM outcomes in achalasia patients and identified risk factors for POEM failure. Relevant information was extracted and analyzed using fixed- or randomized-effect models to pool the effect size. RESULTS: A total of 27 studies comprising 9371 patients with achalasia were included in this review. The pooled failure rate was 8% (90% CI 7%-10%). We identified sigmoid esophagus (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.45-2.47), type I achalasia (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.04-1.63), and type III achalasia (OR 1.26, 95% CI 0.89-1.78) were associated with a worse clinical response. Conversely, type II achalasia was associated with a better response (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.47-0.75). Prior treatment with Heller myotomy (OR 5.75, 95% CI 3.97-8.34) and prior balloon dilation (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.07-1.29) were also associated with a higher risk of clinical failure. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis results demonstrated that sigmoid esophagus, manometric achalasia subtype, and prior treatment were associated with POEM failure. This information could be used to guide treatment decisions and improve the success rate of POEM in achalasia patients.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Achalasia , Myotomy , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery , Esophageal Achalasia/surgery , Humans , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Myotomy/methods , Risk Factors , Treatment Failure , Treatment Outcome , Esophagoscopy/methods , Heller Myotomy/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL