ABSTRACT
Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a severe adverse reaction associated with neuroleptic or antipsychotic drugs. This case report discusses a 43-year-old man with a history of bipolar disorder and polysubstance abuse who presented with altered mental status, autonomic dysfunction, and muscular rigidity. The patient had recently started on ziprasidone, a second-generation antipsychotic, leading to an atypical presentation of NMS. Unlike classic findings associated with NMS induced by first-generation antipsychotics, this case lacked high fever, lead pipe rigidity, or elevated creatine kinase levels greater than 1000 on initial presentation. The delay in diagnosis was attributed to the milder symptoms and absence of typical findings, resulting in extensive diagnostic workup and interventions. The patient responded positively to treatment with lorazepam based on the Woodbury severity stage guidelines. This case underscores the complexity of diagnosing NMS induced by second-generation antipsychotics and highlights the need for awareness and tailored treatment approaches for atypical presentations.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome , Piperazines , Thiazoles , Humans , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome/diagnosis , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome/etiology , Male , Adult , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Thiazoles/adverse effects , Piperazines/adverse effects , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Lorazepam/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a rare yet severe condition typically associated with antipsychotic medications. Here, we present a case of NMS induced by prochlorperazine in a 76-year-old male with multiple comorbidities, aiming to delineate its clinical manifestation, diagnostic complexities, and treatment approaches. Our methodology involved a thorough documentation of the patient's medical history, initial symptoms, physical examination findings, laboratory results, diagnostic processes, and subsequent therapeutic interventions. The patient exhibited classic NMS symptoms, including fever, altered mental status, autonomic dysregulation, and generalized rigidity, consistent with diagnostic criteria. Notably, laboratory investigations failed to reveal the typical abnormalities often seen in NMS cases, highlighting the diverse presentation of this syndrome. Management strategies primarily focused on benzodiazepines and amantadine, leading to a gradual improvement in symptoms and eventual resolution of NMS. This underscores the critical role of early recognition and appropriate pharmacotherapy in managing prochlorperazine-induced NMS, even at standard dosage levels. The absence of characteristic laboratory findings in NMS poses challenges in diagnosis, necessitating a comprehensive clinical assessment for accurate identification. Moreover, this case emphasizes the need for further research to better understand the pathophysiology of prochlorperazine-induced NMS and optimize treatment protocols. In conclusion, our case report sheds light on the complexities surrounding NMS induced by prochlorperazine, emphasizing the importance of vigilant monitoring and tailored therapeutic strategies in mitigating its potentially life-threatening consequences.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome , Prochlorperazine , Humans , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome/diagnosis , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome/etiology , Male , Prochlorperazine/therapeutic use , Prochlorperazine/adverse effects , Aged , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS), which most often occurs after the use of antipsychotics, is a rare but life-threatening condition. In this article, a 56-year-old male patient with a diagnosis of bipolar affective disorder (BPD) who developed NMS after a COVID-19 infection will be presented. The patient had been brought to the emergency room with high fever, fatigue, and slowness of movements that had been going on for two days. The examination revealed tachycardia, tachypnea, lethargy and rigidity. Upon further investigation the COVID-19 test came out positive and the serum levels of creatine kinase were considerably high. He was admitted to the psychiatric ward with diagnoses of COVID-19 infection and NMS. COVID-19 infection might have been a risk factor for NMS in this patient. Especially in patients who are taking antipsychotic drugs, if COVID-19 is present, the risk of NMS should be taken into consideration. Keyword: COVID-19, Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome, Risperidone, Antipsikotik, Enfeksiyon.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , COVID-19 , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome , Male , Humans , Middle Aged , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome/diagnosis , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome/etiology , COVID-19/complications , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Risperidone/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Significant elevation of creatine kinase levels (above three digits) and leucocytosis in the absence of muscle rigidity, tremors, or autonomic dysfunction can pose a real challenge in the context of antipsychotic treatment as an early herald of neuroleptic malignant syndrome. CASE PRESENTATION: We present here two cases of adult male patients of Black British heritage, ages 51 years and 28 years, respectively. Both received a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder and presented with massive increase of creatine kinase blood level after aripiprazole depot administration, one with pernicious increase associated with silent neuroleptic malignant syndrome, and the second with asymptomatic benign enzyme elevation. CONCLUSION: Though aripiprazole use is less likely to cause neuroleptic malignant syndrome, on rare occasions it can produce massive symptomatic or asymptomatic increase in serum creatine kinase enzyme levels, raising the need for close monitoring, especially at the initial doses of the drug.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome , Psychotic Disorders , Adult , Humans , Male , Aripiprazole , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome/diagnosis , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome/drug therapy , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome/etiology , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Creatine KinaseABSTRACT
An incarcerated male patient with a psychiatric history of schizoaffective disorder presented to the emergency department with muscle rigidity and mutism after receiving a 150 mg haloperidol decanoate injection. At the peak of his illness, symptoms included muscular rigidity, mutism, excessive drooling, an altered level of consciousness, tachycardia, diaphoresis and tremors. Atypical neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) was diagnosed after discrediting similar illnesses through clinical reasoning, laboratory and imaging studies. He was successfully treated during a 40-day hospitalisation with lorazepam, amantadine, methocarbamol and supportive care. This case represents an atypical presentation of NMS due to the patient's lack of fever development. Nonetheless, he satisfied many other criteria, most notably rapid symptom onset after receiving a first-generation antipsychotic medication. The case also provides an opportunity to discuss the prevalence of psychiatric illness among the US incarcerated population and incarceration as a risk factor for developing NMS.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Mutism , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome , Prisoners , Male , Humans , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome/diagnosis , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome/etiology , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome/drug therapy , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , DemographyABSTRACT
Catatonia occurs secondary to both primary psychiatric and neuromedical etiologies. Emerging evidence suggests possible linkages between causes of catatonia and neuroinflammation. These include obvious infectious and inflammatory etiologies, common neuromedical illnesses such as delirium, and psychiatric entities such as depression and autism-spectrum disorders. Symptoms of sickness behavior, thought to be a downstream effect of the cytokine response, are common in many of these etiologies and overlap significantly with symptoms of catatonia. Furthermore, there are syndromes that overlap with catatonia that some would consider variants, including neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) and akinetic mutism, which may also have neuroinflammatory underpinnings. Low serum iron, a common finding in NMS and malignant catatonia, may be caused by the acute phase response. Cellular hits involving either pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMP) danger signals or the damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMP) danger signals of severe psychosocial stress may set the stage for a common pathway immunoactivation state that could lower the threshold for a catatonic state in susceptible individuals. Immunoactivation leading to dysfunction in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC)/mid-cingulate cortex (MCC)/medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC)/paralimbic cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical (CSTC) circuit, involved in motivation and movement, may be particularly important in generating the motor and behavioral symptoms of catatonia.
Subject(s)
Catatonia , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome , Humans , Catatonia/diagnosis , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome/etiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a rare life-threatening condition that providers should be cognizant of when prescribing dopamine-receptor antagonists. Atypical antipsychotic agents were initially considered to have a lower risk of inducing the development of NMS compared with conventional antipsychotic. Considerable evidence, however, has suggested that atypical antipsychotics are associated with NMS, including the partial dopamine agonist, aripiprazole. There is growing evidence that other psychotropics, including lithium, cause this condition. Here, the authors present a case of a patient who developed NMS from lithium and aripiprazole and provide a literature review of reported NMS cases with either psychotropic. METHOD AND RESULTS: The authors report the case of 60-year-old male patient who developed NMS over a hospital course during which both aripiprazole and lithium were prescribed. In addition, a literature review was performed and a summary of cases of NMS induced by either lithium and/or aripiprazole is provided. CONCLUSIONS: This case adds to the growing body of literature of aripiprazole and lithium-induced NMS. Only 2 other cases are reported where concomitant aripiprazole and lithium use lead to NMS. Interestingly, our patient did develop lithium toxicity during hospitalization, but the NMS diagnosis occurred after lithium toxicity resolved. This varies from the other 2 cases where NMS developed despite lithium levels always being therapeutic. Unfortunately, there are more questions than answers surrounding this rare complication involving these 2 psychotropics and clinical vigilance is warranted when using these psychotropics especially in cases where aripiprazole and lithium are used in combination.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome , Male , Humans , Middle Aged , Aripiprazole/adverse effects , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome/diagnosis , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome/etiology , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome/drug therapy , Lithium , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Dopamine AntagonistsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis (ANMDARE) is a neuroimmunological disorder that frequently improves with immunotherapy. Symptomatic treatment with antipsychotics is common in the early stages when psychiatric symptoms predominate, and their use has been associated with serious side effects including neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS). The observation of an adverse response to antipsychotics, raising the suspicion of NMS, has been included as a criterion for possible autoimmune psychosis. METHODS: This case-control study included patients who received antipsychotics before referral to the National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery of Mexico, where they were diagnosed as having definite ANMDARE, and patients with ANMDARE who did not receive antipsychotics before referral. The neurologic and systemic features that are used to measure an adverse response to antipsychotics, raising the suspicion of NMS, were measured in both groups, including akinesia, autonomic instability, generalized rigidity, elevated concentrations of creatine phosphokinase, and hyperthermia. A logistic regression analysis was used to determine the relationship between the previous use of antipsychotics and the occurrence of NMS-like reactions. RESULTS: A total sample of 112 patients with definite ANMDARE were included in the study. Fifty patients received antipsychotics before being referred to our institution. In this group, thirty-six patients (72%) were initially classified as having an adverse response, raising the suspicion of NMS, with the following features: akinesia (64%), autonomic instability (58%), generalized rigidity (52%), elevated concentrations of creatine phosphokinase (50%), and hyperthermia (14%). Six patients fulfilled the criteria for NMS (12%). The comparison with patients who did not receive antipsychotics before the clinical assessment did not show a significant difference between groups regarding the frequency of akinesia, autonomic instability, generalized rigidity, elevated concentrations of creatine phosphokinase, or hyperthermia. Among different antipsychotics, only haloperidol was significantly associated with generalized rigidity as compared to patients who did not receive antipsychotics. CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports previous observations about the high frequency of autonomic dysfunction, hyperthermia, tachycardia, rigidity, and elevated creatine phosphokinase levels in patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis following the administration of antipsychotic medications. Nevertheless, our study does not suggest a causal link between atypical antipsychotics and the onset of these neurological symptoms, as they were equally frequent among the group of patients who did not receive antipsychotic treatment.
Subject(s)
Anti-N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Encephalitis , Antipsychotic Agents , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Anti-N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Encephalitis/complications , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Case-Control Studies , Mexico/epidemiology , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome/drug therapy , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome/etiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a neurologic emergency potentially fatal. This rare side effect is most commonly associated with first-generation antipsychotics and less frequently with atypical or second-generation antipsychotics. The diagnosis relies on both clinical and laboratory criteria, with other organic and psychiatric conditions being ruled out. CASE REPORT: A 39-year-old female patient, who is institutionalized and completely dependent, has a medical history of recurrent urinary infections and colonization by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Her regular medication regimen included sertraline, valproic acid, quetiapine, risperidone, lorazepam, diazepam, haloperidol, baclofen, and fentanyl. The patient began experiencing dyspnea. Upon physical examination, she exhibited hypotension and a diminished vesicular murmur at the right base during pulmonary auscultation. Initially, after hospitalization, she developed high febrile peaks associated with hemodynamic instability, prompting the initiation of antibiotic treatment. Despite this, her fever persisted without an increase in blood inflammatory parameters, and she developed purulent sputum, necessitating antibiotherapy escalation. The seventh day of hospitalization showed no improvement in symptoms, suggesting NNMS as a differential diagnosis. All antipsychotic and sedative drugs, as well as antibiotherapy, were discontinued, after which the patient showed significant clinical improvement. CONCLUSION: Antipsychotic agents are commonly employed to manage behavioral changes linked to various disorders. However, their severe side effects necessitate a high degree of vigilance, the cessation of all medications, and the implementation of supportive care measures. A prompt and accurate diagnosis of NMS is crucial to alleviating the severe, prolonged morbidity and potential mortality associated with this syndrome.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome , Female , Humans , Adult , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Haloperidol/adverse effects , Quetiapine Fumarate/adverse effects , Risperidone/adverse effects , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome/diagnosis , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome/drug therapy , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome/etiologySubject(s)
Antiemetics , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome , Rhabdomyolysis , Humans , Droperidol/adverse effects , Metoclopramide/adverse effects , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome/etiology , Antiemetics/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Rhabdomyolysis/chemically induced , Double-Blind MethodABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a life-threatening condition that occurs as an adverse reaction to antipsychotic and antiemetic agents or sudden withdrawal of dopaminergic medications. Given the metabolic and functional reserves and the comorbidities in older adults, NMS may show an atypical course. METHODS: The medical records of patients with neurodegenerative diseases leading to dementia between 2013 and 2020 were reviewed for the diagnosis of NMS. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients were obtained from the records of laboratory parameters, management, and length of stay. RESULTS: Fifteen older adults (19 episodes) diagnosed with NMS were included. The median age was 76 years, and 5 were female. Ten of 15 NMS patients were atypical. Most of them had an infection accompanying NMS. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome was caused by antidopaminergic agents (5 antipsychotics, 1 metoclopramide) in 6 episodes and discontinuation of a dopaminergic agent, l -DOPA, in 12 episodes. In 1 patient, it was associated with simultaneous use of domperidone and amantadine withdrawal. Rigidity in NMS due to l -DOPA discontinuation was higher than in those due to antipsychotic use ( P = 0.027). Two of our patients needed intensive care, and 1 died. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the high frequency of atypical NMS and the importance of early recognition of this potentially fatal syndrome, which can accompany neurodegenerative diseases and infections in older adults.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Dementia , Neurodegenerative Diseases , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome , Humans , Female , Aged , Male , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome/diagnosis , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome/etiology , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome/drug therapy , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Neurodegenerative Diseases/complications , Dementia/complications , Dementia/drug therapy , Dihydroxyphenylalanine/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a rare but serious and sometimes fatal complication in patients taking antipsychotic drugs, and its underlying mechanism still remains unclear. The pharmacotherapy for psychotic disorders is complicated and often involves a combination of two or more drugs, including drugs other than antipsychotics. In the present study, we used the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database to broadly investigate the drugs associated with NMS, following their related pathways, as well as the drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in NMS. All analyses were performed using data from the JADER database from April 2004 to May 2022. Single-drug signals were evaluated using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and proportional reporting ratio (PRR), and drug pathways were investigated using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG). DDIs were evaluated using the Ω shrinkage measure and Chi-square statistics models. All drugs associated with 20 or more NMS cases in the JADER database exhibited signals for NMS, including non-antipsychotics. Pathways associated with the drugs included the dopaminergic or serotonergic synapses related to antipsychotics. DDIs leading to NMS were confirmed for several drug combinations exhibiting single-drug signals. This study confirmed the significant association of various drugs, including non-psychotics, with NMS and suggested that various pathways related to these drugs may be involved in the progression of NMS. In addition, several combinations of these drugs were found to interact (DDI), increasing the risk of NMS, which suggests that appropriate caution should be taken when administering these drugs.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome , Psychotic Disorders , Humans , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome/etiology , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome/drug therapy , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/complications , Drug InteractionsSubject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome , Humans , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome/diagnosis , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome/etiology , Lithium , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/etiology , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/drug therapy , Antisocial Personality Disorder/drug therapyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Antipsychotic-induced catatonia (AIC) and neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) are life-threatening adverse reactions to antipsychotic medication. We conducted a systematic review of literature following the PRISMA statement guidelines to obtain a description of these syndromes (population, context of occurrence, antipsychotic agents implicated) and draw conclusions about their links. METHODS: We searched Medline and Web of science databases from January 1951 to May 2019 (further restricted from 2000 to 2019) using search terms including "catatonia", "neuroleptic malignant syndrome" and "antipsychotic agents" for case reports, case series and analytic studies. After screening 4082 records, 410 full-text articles (describing 555 events) were assessed for eligibility. We included events of AIC and/or NMS according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) criteria and extracted data about patients' characteristics, context of occurrence, antipsychotic agent(s) involved and treatment outcomes. RESULTS: We included 165 events (16 AIC, 129 NMS and 20 AIC + NMS) from 144 case reports and case series. The most reported diagnosis was schizophrenia. Comorbid pre-existing conditions such as central nervous system diseases and acute medical events were common. Most of the events (63.3 %) occurred during antipsychotic monotherapy. Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs, 63.8 %) were overall more implicated than first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs, 36.2 %). DISCUSSION: Our findings highlight that any antipsychotic medication, even SGA monotherapy prescribed at recommended dose, is at risk for these side effects. FGAs and polypharmacy seem to represent risk factors for malignant catatonia in AIC. The clinical overlap observed between AIC and NMS events in our review suggests a clinical continuum between catatonia and NMS.