Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 16.468
Filter
1.
Int Ophthalmol ; 44(1): 242, 2024 Jun 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38904666

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) calculations is one of the key indicators for determining the success of cataract surgery. However, in highly myopic patients, the calculation errors are relatively larger than those in general patients. With the continuous development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology, there has also been a constant emergence of AI-related calculation formulas. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the accuracy of AI calculation formulas in calculating the power of IOL for highly myopic patients. METHODS: We searched the relevant literature through August 2023 using three databases: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Six IOL calculation formulas were compared: Kane, Hill-RBF, EVO, Barrett II, Haigis, and SRK/T. The included metrics were the mean absolute error (MAE) and percentage of errors within ± 0.25 D, ± 0.50 D, and ± 1.00 D. RESULTS: The results showed that the MAE of Kane was significantly lower than that of Barrett II (mean difference = - 0.03 D, P = 0.02), SRK/T (MD = - 0.08 D, P = 0.02), and Haigis (MD = - 0.12 D, P < 0.00001). The percentage refractive prediction errors for Kane at ± 0.25 D, ± 0.50 D, and ± 1.00 D were significantly greater than those for SRK/T (P = 0.007, 0.003, and 0.01, respectively) and Haigis (P = 0.009, 0.0001, and 0.001, respectively). No statistically significant differences were noted between Hill-RBF and Barret, but Hill-RBF was significantly better than SRK/T and Haigis. CONCLUSION: The AI calculation formulas showed more accurate results compared with traditional formulas. Among them, Kane has the best performance in calculating IOL degrees for highly myopic patients.


Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , Lenses, Intraocular , Refraction, Ocular , Visual Acuity , Humans , Refraction, Ocular/physiology , Optics and Photonics , Biometry/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Myopia, Degenerative/physiopathology , Myopia, Degenerative/diagnosis , Myopia/physiopathology , Myopia/diagnosis
2.
Int Ophthalmol ; 44(1): 261, 2024 Jun 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38913082

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the visual and refractive outcomes in patients with pseudoexfoliation (PXF) undergoing routine cataract surgery and to compare the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulae. METHODS: Retrospective case-series study from Shamir medical center, a public hospital, Israel. Medical records of patients who underwent routine cataract surgery between January 2019 and August 2021 were investigated. Postoperative visual acuity and manifest refraction were examined. The error in predicted refraction and IOL power calculation accuracy within a range of ± 0.50 to ± 1.00 diopters were compared between different IOL calculating formulae. RESULTS: 151 eyes of 151 patients ages 73.9 ± 7.1 years were included in this study- 58 eyes in the PXF group and 93 eyes in the control group. The mean absolute error (MAE) for the BUII formula was 0.63D ± 0.87 for the PXF group and 0.36D ± 0.48 for the control group (p < 0.05). The MAE for the Hill-RBF 3.0 formula was 0.61D ± 0.84 for the PXF group and 0.42D ± 0.55 for the control group (p = 0.05). There were significant differences in MAE and MedAE between PXF group and control group measures (p < 0.05). In the PXF group there were no significant differences between the different formulae. CONCLUSIONS: There were significant differences in accuracy of IOL power calculations in all formulae between PXF group and control group measures. PXF patients show hyperopic shift from predicted refraction. Barret universal II formula had the highest proportion of eyes with absolute error in prediction below or equal to 0.50 D in both PXF and control groups.


Subject(s)
Exfoliation Syndrome , Lenses, Intraocular , Refraction, Ocular , Visual Acuity , Humans , Exfoliation Syndrome/physiopathology , Exfoliation Syndrome/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Female , Male , Visual Acuity/physiology , Refraction, Ocular/physiology , Biometry/methods , Aged, 80 and over , Optics and Photonics , Reproducibility of Results
3.
J Refract Surg ; 40(6): e354-e361, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38848053

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the predictive accuracy of new-generation online intraocular lens (IOL) power formulas in eyes with previous myopic laser refractive surgery (LRS) and to evaluate the influence of corneal asphericity on the predictive accuracy. METHODS: The authors retrospectively evaluated 52 patients (78 eyes) with a history of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) who subsequently underwent cataract surgery. Refractive prediction errors were calculated for 12 no-history new online formulas: 8 formulas with post-LRS versions (Barrett True-K, EVO 2.0, Hoffer QST, and Pearl DGS) using keratometry and posterior/total keratometry measured by IOLMaster 700 and 4 formulas without post-LRS versions (Cooke K6 and Kane) using keratometry and total keratometry. The refractive prediction error, mean absolute error (MAE), and percentages of eyes with prediction errors of ±0.25, ±0.50, ±0.75, ±1.00, and ±1.50 diopters (D) were compared. RESULTS: The MAEs of the 12 formulas were significantly different (F = 83.66, P < .001). The MAEs ranged from 0.62 to 0.94 D and from 1.07 to 1.84 D in the formulas with and without post-LRS versions, respectively. The EVO formula produced the lowest MAE (0.60) and MedAE (0.47), followed by the Barrett True-K (0.69 and 0.50, respectively). Each percentage of eyes with refractive prediction error was also significantly different among the 12 formulas (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The EVO and Barrett True-K formulas demonstrate comparable performance to the other existing formulas in eyes with a history of myopic LASIK/PRK. Surgeons should use these formulas with post-LRS versions and input keratometric values whenever possible. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(6):e354-e361.].


Subject(s)
Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ , Lens Implantation, Intraocular , Lenses, Intraocular , Myopia , Optics and Photonics , Photorefractive Keratectomy , Refraction, Ocular , Visual Acuity , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Myopia/surgery , Myopia/physiopathology , Female , Male , Refraction, Ocular/physiology , Middle Aged , Photorefractive Keratectomy/methods , Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ/methods , Adult , Visual Acuity/physiology , Lasers, Excimer/therapeutic use , Cornea/surgery , Cornea/physiopathology , Reproducibility of Results , Biometry/methods , Phacoemulsification , Aged
4.
J Biomed Opt ; 29(Suppl 1): S11500, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38846410

ABSTRACT

The editorial concludes the JBO Special Issue Honoring Lihong V. Wang, outlining Prof. Wang's salient contributions to advancing the field of biomedical optics.


Subject(s)
Optics and Photonics , Optics and Photonics/history , History, 21st Century , History, 20th Century , Humans
5.
Transl Vis Sci Technol ; 13(6): 2, 2024 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38837172

ABSTRACT

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop a simplified method to approximate constants minimizing the standard deviation (SD) and the root mean square (RMS) of the prediction error in single-optimized intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas. Methods: The study introduces analytical formulas to determine the optimal constant value for minimizing SD and RMS in single-optimized IOL power calculation formulas. These formulas were tested against various datasets containing biometric measurements from cataractous populations and included 10,330 eyes and 4 different IOL models. The study evaluated the effectiveness of the proposed method by comparing the outcomes with those obtained using traditional reference methods. Results: In optimizing IOL constants, minor differences between reference and estimated A-constants were found, with the maximum deviation at -0.086 (SD, SRK/T, and Vivinex) and -0.003 (RMS, PEARL DGS, and Vivinex). The largest discrepancy for third-generation formulas was -0.027 mm (SD, Haigis, and Vivinex) and 0.002 mm (RMS, Hoffer Q, and PCB00/SN60WF). Maximum RMS differences were -0.021 and +0.021, both involving Hoffer Q. Post-minimization, the largest mean prediction error was 0.726 diopters (D; SD) and 0.043 D (RMS), with the highest SD and RMS after adjustments at 0.529 D and 0.875 D, respectively, indicating effective minimization strategies. Conclusions: The study simplifies the process of minimizing SD and RMS in single-optimized IOL power predictions, offering a valuable tool for clinicians. However, it also underscores the complexity of achieving balanced optimization and suggests the need for further research in this area. Translational Relevance: The study presents a novel, clinically practical approach for optimizing IOL power calculations.


Subject(s)
Lenses, Intraocular , Optics and Photonics , Humans , Optics and Photonics/methods , Biometry/methods , Refraction, Ocular/physiology , Female , Male , Lens Implantation, Intraocular/methods , Aged , Visual Acuity/physiology , Middle Aged
6.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 72(7): 1021-1025, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38905462

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The anterior segment in individuals with high myopia has different features compared to those without myopia. IOLMaster 700 and Oculus Pentacam AXL are two accurate optical biometers. Both devices measure the cornea differently and thus yield different results when measuring intraocular lens (IOL) power. The purpose of this study is to assess the agreement of the IOL power calculation between IOLMaster 700 and Oculus Pentacam AXL in patients with high myopia. METHODS: A prospective, analytical cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the agreement between the IOL power calculation with IOLMaster 700 and Oculus Pentacam AXL. In this study, 44 eyes were examined using Oculus Pentacam AXL and IOLMaster 700, and IOL power was calculated using the Barret Universal II formula and the AMO Sensar AR40E. The Bland-Altman plot was used to evaluate the agreement between the two devices. RESULTS: Based on the IOLMaster 700 examination, 44 eyes with high myopia had axial lengths ranging from 26.05 to 34.02 mm. The mean IOL power was 8.26 ± 4.755 and 8.58 ± 4.776 based on IOLMaster 700 and Oculus Pentacam AXL, respectively. The Bland-Altman plot revealed good agreement between the two devices, with a mean difference of -0.3182 in the IOL power calculation and a 95% LoA of 0.88099-0.24462 with a 95% confidence interval. CONCLUSION: Both devices showed good agreement in the IOL power calculation in patients with high myopia.


Subject(s)
Biometry , Lenses, Intraocular , Refraction, Ocular , Humans , Prospective Studies , Male , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Biometry/instrumentation , Biometry/methods , Refraction, Ocular/physiology , Adult , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Optics and Photonics , Myopia/physiopathology , Myopia/diagnosis , Axial Length, Eye , Myopia, Degenerative/diagnosis , Myopia, Degenerative/physiopathology
7.
Luminescence ; 39(6): e4802, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38923760

ABSTRACT

Erbium-incorporated silicophosphate glasses are very desirable in principal sectors such as photonics, optoelectronics, lasers, and illuminating diodes. The focus of the current investigation has been on determining how the erbium dopant affects the optical, physical, and structural characteristics of the silicophosphate-based glasses. The pure silicophosphate glasses and doped with various contents of erbium were prepared by the sol-gel process in this work. The noncrystalline character of the glasses synthesized was confirmed by the XRD patterns that were obtained. The optical measurement showed that the addition of trivalent erbium ions resulted in an increase in the refractive index of the samples and a decrease in their energy band gap values. It demonstrated the presence of P-O-P linkage stretching vibration modes that were both symmetrical and asymmetrical, P-O in PO4 bending vibration modes, OH group elongating and flexure vibrations, and P-O-H water absorption in glasses. The theoretical values of the optical basicity (Ʌth) increased from 0.465 to 0.472, while the values of the interaction parameter (A) decreased from 0.218 to 0.214 Š- 3 $$ {\overset{\ocirc }{\mathrm{A}}}^{-3} $$ . Silicophosphate glasses doped with trivalent erbium ions show promise as optoelectronic and optical filter system materials.


Subject(s)
Erbium , Glass , Phosphates , Glass/chemistry , Erbium/chemistry , Phosphates/chemistry , Optics and Photonics , Optical Phenomena , X-Ray Diffraction
8.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt ; 44(5): 867-875, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38699941

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The fit and optical performance of a scleral lens is affected by the alignment of the landing zone with the underlying ocular surface. The aim of this research was to quantify the effect of landing zone toricity upon scleral lens fitting characteristics (rotation and decentration) and optics (lens flexure) during short-term wear. METHODS: Scleral lenses with nominal landing zone toricities of 0, 100, 150 and 200 µm were worn in a randomised order by 10 young healthy participants (mean [SD] 24 [7] years) for 30 min, with other lens parameters held constant. Scleral toricity was quantified using a corneo-scleral profilometer, and lens flexure, rotation, and decentration were quantified using over-topography during lens wear. Repeated measures analyses were conducted as a function of landing zone toricity and residual scleral toricity (the difference between scleral and lens toricity) for eyes with 'low' magnitude scleral toricity (mean: 96 µm) and 'high' magnitude scleral toricity (mean: 319 µm). RESULTS: Toric landing zones significantly reduced lens flexure (by 0.37 [0.21] D, p < 0.05) and lens rotation (by 20 [24]°, p < 0.05) compared with a spherical landing zone. Horizontal and vertical lens decentration did not vary significantly with landing zone toricity. These trends for flexure, rotation, and decentration were also observed for eyes with 'low' and 'high' magnitude scleral toricity as a function of residual scleral toricity. CONCLUSION: Landing zones with 100-200 µm toricity significantly reduced lens flexure (by ~62%) and rotation (by ~77%) but not horizontal or vertical lens decentration, compared with a spherical landing zone, when controlling for other confounding variables. The incorporation of a toric landing zone, even for eyes with lower magnitude scleral toricity (~100 µm), may be beneficial, particularly for front surface optical designs.


Subject(s)
Contact Lenses , Refraction, Ocular , Sclera , Humans , Male , Young Adult , Adult , Female , Refraction, Ocular/physiology , Prosthesis Fitting , Optics and Photonics , Corneal Topography , Visual Acuity/physiology
9.
Biomed Phys Eng Express ; 10(4)2024 Jun 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38714186

ABSTRACT

Keratoprosthesis (KPro) is a surgical procedure largely confined to end-stage corneal blindness correction, where artificial cornea substitutes the native tissue. Though the problem of bio integration was addressed partially by strategic utilization of synthetic polymers and native tissue, major challenges like optical performance and design-associated post-operative complications of KPro were overlooked. Herein, a novel intralamellar KPro design is conceptualized to address these challenges using a light-transparent poly(2-hydroxy ethylmethacrylate) (pHEMA) hydrogel with good shape memory. pHEMA-based optics' theoretically modelled refractive surfaces for both phakic and aphakic conditions were investigated against the standard Navarro model and optimized to new aspheric geometries having high optical functionality utilizing the Zemax OpticStudio software. The optical clear aperture size standardized achieved a 15% improvement in the illumination field. The introduction of asphericity on the two refractive surfaces of the optic on both models resulted in substantial improvements in the spot spread confinement on the retina, spatial resolution, and Seidel aberration. The design simulation study shows that the developed materials' optical characteristics coupled with newly optimized refractive surface geometries can indeed deliver very high visual performance. Furthermore, the procedure can be adapted to analyze and optimize the optical performance of a KPro, intraocular lens, or contact lens.


Subject(s)
Cornea , Hydrogels , Polyhydroxyethyl Methacrylate , Prostheses and Implants , Prosthesis Design , Cornea/surgery , Humans , Hydrogels/chemistry , Polyhydroxyethyl Methacrylate/chemistry , Computer Simulation , Optics and Photonics
10.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 10921, 2024 05 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38769346

ABSTRACT

Differentiation between leukocyte subtypes like monocytes and lymphocytes is essential for cell therapy and research applications. To guarantee the cost-effective delivery of functional cells in cell therapies, billions of cells must be processed in a limited time. Yet, the sorting rates of commercial cell sorters are not high enough to reach the required yield. Process parallelization by using multiple instruments increases variability and production cost. A compact solution with higher throughput can be provided by multichannel flow cytometers combining fluidics and optics on-chip. In this work, we present a micro-flow cytometer with monolithically integrated photonics and fluidics and demonstrate that both the illumination of cells, as well as the collection of scattered light, can be realized using photonic integrated circuits. Our device is the first with sufficient resolution for the discrimination of lymphocytes and monocytes. Innovations in microfabrication have enabled complete integration of miniaturized photonic components and fluidics in a CMOS-compatible wafer stack. In combination with external optics, the device is ready for the collection of fluorescence using the on-chip excitation.


Subject(s)
Flow Cytometry , Lab-On-A-Chip Devices , Leukocytes , Humans , Flow Cytometry/methods , Flow Cytometry/instrumentation , Leukocytes/cytology , Optics and Photonics/instrumentation , Optics and Photonics/methods , Monocytes/cytology , Lymphocytes/cytology , Equipment Design
11.
J Biomed Opt ; 29(5): 052901, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38817337

ABSTRACT

The editorial introduces the two-issue JBO Special Section on Polarimetry in Biomedical Optics and provides resources for further exploration.


Subject(s)
Optics and Photonics , Humans
12.
Vestn Oftalmol ; 140(2): 34-39, 2024.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38742496

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study evaluates the accuracy of modern intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas using axial length (AL) data obtained by ultrasound biometry (UBM) compared to the third-generation SRK/T calculator. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 230 patients (267 eyes) with severe lens opacities that prevented optical biometry, who underwent phacoemulsification (PE) with IOL implantation. IOL power calculation according to the SRK/T formula was based on AL and anterior chamber depth obtained by UBM (Tomey Biometer Al-100) and keratometry on the Topcon KR 8800 autorefractometer. To adapt AL for new generation calculators - Barrett Universal II (BUII), Hill RBF ver. 3.0 (RBF), Kane and Ladas Super Formula (LSF) - the retinal thickness (0.20 mm) was added to the axial length determined by UBM, and then the optical power of the artificial lens was calculated. The mean error and its modulus value were used as criteria for the accuracy of IOL calculation. RESULTS: A significant difference (p=0.008) in the mean IOL calculation error was found between the formulas. Pairwise analysis revealed differences between SRK/T (-0.32±0.58 D) and other formulas - BUII (-0.16±0.52 D; p=0.014), RBF (-0.17±0.51 D; p=0.024), Kane (-0.17±0.52 D; p=0.029), but not with the LSF calculator (-0.19±0.53 D; p=0.071). No significant differences between the formulas were found in terms of mean error modulus (p=0.238). New generation calculators showed a more frequent success in hitting target refraction (within ±1.00 D in more than 95% of cases) than the SRK/T formula (86%). CONCLUSION: The proposed method of adding 0.20 mm to the AL determined by UBM allows using this parameter in modern IOL calculation formulas and improving the refractive results of PE, especially in eyes with non-standard anterior segment structure.


Subject(s)
Biometry , Lenses, Intraocular , Phacoemulsification , Refraction, Ocular , Humans , Biometry/methods , Male , Female , Aged , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Refraction, Ocular/physiology , Phacoemulsification/methods , Axial Length, Eye/diagnostic imaging , Lens Implantation, Intraocular/methods , Cataract/physiopathology , Cataract/diagnosis , Optics and Photonics/methods , Microscopy, Acoustic/methods
13.
J Refract Surg ; 40(4): e253-e259, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38593262

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare simulated keratometry (SimK) and total corneal power (TCP) in keratoconic eyes, to determine whether the differences are systematic and predictable and to evaluate an adjusted TCP-based formula for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation. METHODS: In a consecutive series of keratoconic eyes, measurements of SimK, TCP, posterior keratometry, and anterior and posterior corneal asphericities (Q-values) were retrospectively collected. The difference between SimK and TCP was linearly correlated to the biometric parameters. In a separate sample of keratoconic eyes that had undergone cataract surgery, IOL power was calculated with the Barrett Universal II, Hoffer QST, Holladay 1, Kane, and SRK/T formulas using the SimK and an adjusted TCP power. The respective prediction errors were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 382 keratoconic eyes (271 patients) were enrolled. An increasing overestimation of SimK by TCP was detected from stage I to III, with a significant correlation between the SimK and TCP difference and SimK in the whole sample (P < .0001, r2 = 0.1322). Approximately 7% of cases presented an underestimation of SimK by TCP. IOL power calculation with the adjusted TCP improved outcomes, achieving a maximum of 80% of eyes with a prediction error within ±0.50 diopters with the Hoffer QST, Holladay 1, and Kane formulas. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, SimK overestimated TCP. Such a difference could not be predicted by any variable. The proposed TCP-adjustment formula (TCPadj = TCP + 0.56 diopters) in keratoconic eyes for IOL power calculation might be valuable for improving refractive outcomes. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(4):e253-e259.].


Subject(s)
Keratoconus , Lenses, Intraocular , Phacoemulsification , Humans , Keratoconus/diagnosis , Lens Implantation, Intraocular/methods , Retrospective Studies , Phacoemulsification/methods , Optics and Photonics , Refraction, Ocular , Biometry/methods
14.
ACS Biomater Sci Eng ; 10(5): 2784-2804, 2024 05 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38597279

ABSTRACT

Flexible electronics, applicable to enlarged health, AI big data medications, etc., have been one of the most important technologies of this century. Due to its particular mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and biodegradability, cocoon silk (or SF, silk fibroin) plays a key role in flexible electronics/photonics. The review begins with an examination of the hierarchical meso network structures of SF materials and introduces the concepts of meso reconstruction, meso doping, and meso hybridization based on the correlation between the structure and performance of silk materials. The SF meso functionalization was developed according to intermolecular nuclear templating. By implementation of the techniques of meso reconstruction and functionalization in the refolding of SF materials, extraordinary performance can be achieved. Relying on this strategy, particularly designed flexible electronic and photonic components can be developed. This review covers the latest ideas and technologies of meso flexible electronics and photonics based on SF materials/meso functionalization. As silk materials are biocompatible and human skin-friendly, SF meso flexible electronic/photonic components can be applied to wearable or implanted devices. These devices are applicable in human physiological signals and activities sensing/monitoring. In the case of human-machine interaction, the devices can be applicable in in-body information transmission, computation, and storage, with the potential for the combination of artificial intelligence and human intelligence.


Subject(s)
Electronics , Humans , Animals , Biocompatible Materials/chemistry , Silk/chemistry , Fibroins/chemistry , Wearable Electronic Devices , Optics and Photonics , Bombyx
15.
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi ; 60(6): 494-502, 2024 Jun 11.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38679584

ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate the in vitro optical performance of three types of non-diffractive extended depth-of-focus (EDoF) intraocular lenses (IOLs). Methods: Experimental study. Three Vivity IOLs, three Eyhance IOLs, and three ES60 IOLs were included. The professional optical bench OptiSpheric® IOL PRO 2 and an ISO-2 corneal model were applied. The through-focus modulation transfer function (MTF) and predicted visual acuity (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) of different spatial frequencies and different focuses under apertures of 3.0 mm and 4.5 mm were recorded. The aspheric monofocal (Tecnis ZCB00), diffractive EDoF (Tecnis Symfony), and trifocus (STF1) IOLs, as well as the lowest visual requirement criteria of EDoF IOLs of American Academy of Ophthalmology served as assessment controls. Results: For the 3.0-mm aperture, the peak value of the MTF was highest with ZCB00, followed by Eyhance, ES60, Vivity, Symfony, and STF1. All experimental non-diffractive EDoF IOLs had two MTF peaks, and the distance between both peaks was longest with Vivity (1.76 D), followed by ES60 (1.43 D) and Eyhance (1.36 D). Among the control IOLs, Symfony had two MTF peaks, and the peak MTF of the intermediate focus was highest. STF1 had three MTF peaks, and the peak MTF of the near focus was highest. For the 4.5-mm aperture, the ranking of the MTF peak of the six types of IOLs was the same as that for the 3.0-mm aperture. Vivity had an increased MTF peak of the distance focus, but a decreased intermediate focus MTF peak, while the MTF peaks of the distance, intermediate, and near focuses in the other IOLs decreased, compared to those for the 3.0-mm aperture. The predicted visual acuity of the distance focus of the three types of non-diffractive EDoF IOLs was all better than 0.0. The predicted visual acuity of the intermediate focus of the Vivity IOL and the ES60 IOL was 0.11 and 0.05 better than that of the Eyhance IOL, respectively. Based on the predicted visual acuity of 0.2, Vivity and ES60 had a depth of focus of at least 0.50 D exceeding ZCB00, while Eyhance had a depth of focus of 0.40 D exceeding ZCB00. Conclusions: In the experiments in vitro, the three types of non-diffractive EDoF IOLs exhibited varying degrees of intermediate to near focus optical performance while maintaining distance focus optical performance. The Eyhance IOL showed better distance focus optical performance than ES60 and Vivity IOL. The Vivity IOL and the ES60 IOL showed better depth of focus extensions than the Eyhance IOL and met the lowest visual requirement criteria of EDoF IOLs of American Academy of Ophthalmology.(This article was published ahead of print on the Online-First Publishing Platform for Excellent Scientific Researches of Chinese Medical Association Publishing House on April 29, 2024).


Subject(s)
Lenses, Intraocular , Humans , Prosthesis Design , Depth Perception , Visual Acuity , Refraction, Ocular , Optics and Photonics
16.
Eye (Lond) ; 38(Suppl 1): 4-8, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38580743

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the optical and expected clinical performance of a new refractive Extended Depth of Focus (EDF) intraocular lens (IOL) designed to maintain a monofocal-like dysphotopsia profile. METHODS: Simulated visual acuity (sVA) with varying defocus was calculated using the area under the Modulation Transfer Function measured in an average eye model and from computer simulations in eye models with corneal higher-order aberrations. Tolerance to defocus was evaluated using computer simulations of the uncorrected distance sVA under defocus. To evaluate the dysphotopsia profile, halo pictures obtained using an IOL-telescope, as well as simulated images in a realistic eye model under defocus were assessed. The results of the refractive EDF were compared to those of a diffractive EDF of the same platform. RESULTS: The refractive EDF IOL provides similar range of vision to the diffractive EDF IOL with the same distance, and similar intermediate and near sVA. The refractive EDF IOL provides the same tolerance to hyperopia as the diffractive EDF but more tolerance to myopia. Halo pictures and simulations showed that the refractive EDF provides comparable dysphotopsia profile to the monofocal IOL and better than the diffractive EDF. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this preclinical study in clinically relevant conditions show that the new refractive EDF IOL is expected to provide similar range of vision to the diffractive IOL of the same platform and higher tolerance to refractive errors. The refractive EDF provides a dysphotopsia profile that is better than the diffractive EDF and comparable to that of the monofocal IOL, also in the presence of residual refractive errors.


Subject(s)
Computer Simulation , Lenses, Intraocular , Visual Acuity , Humans , Visual Acuity/physiology , Refraction, Ocular/physiology , Depth Perception/physiology , Prosthesis Design , Optics and Photonics , Vision Disorders/physiopathology , Lens Implantation, Intraocular/methods
17.
BMC Ophthalmol ; 24(1): 198, 2024 Apr 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38671381

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Postoperative performance, including best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) and optical metrics (from the OQAS and iTrace devices), was compared among 4 different intraocular lenses (IOLs). METHODS: This prospective observational study included 104 eyes from 104 subjects who underwent cataract surgery combined with implantation of 4 different IOLs: monofocal (Mon) IOLs, segmental refractive (SegRef) IOLs, diffractive (Dif) IOLs and extended depth of focus (EDoF) IOLs. Postoperative BCDVA and optical metrics were collected at the 6th month. The OQAS optical metrics included the objective scattering index (OSI), Strehl ratio (SR), modulation transfer function (MTF) cut-off frequency, and predicted visual acuity (PVA); the iTrace optical metrics included blur/double vision, glare/halo, starburst, mixed focus, night myopia, and night hyperopia. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in BCDVA among the 4 groups (P = 0.059; power = 70.3%). Differences were observed in all OQAS optical metrics among the groups (all P < 0.001). Overall, Mon IOLs and EDoF IOLs exhibited better performance than Dif IOLs and SegRef IOLs. Starburst was the only iTrace optical metric that differed among the groups (P < 0.001): SegRef IOLs caused more starbursts than Mon IOLs (P = 0.001), Dif IOLs (P = 0.006) and EDoF IOLs (P < 0.001). Spearman rank correlation analysis was used to determine the relationships among the iTrace optical metrics, OQAS optical metrics and BCDVA: starburst was negatively correlated with BCDVA, PVA at contrasts of 100% and 20%, OSI, and MTF cut-off frequency (all P ≤ 0.001); mixed focus was positively correlated with BCDVA, PVA at contrasts of 100% and 20%, OSI, and MTF cut-off frequency (all P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative BCDVA and optical metrics varied among the different IOLs, which should be taken into account in the selection and management of IOLs for cataract patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was approved by the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University Ethical Review Board (No. 50 2022).


Subject(s)
Lenses, Intraocular , Visual Acuity , Humans , Prospective Studies , Visual Acuity/physiology , Female , Male , Aged , Middle Aged , Phacoemulsification , Refraction, Ocular/physiology , Lens Implantation, Intraocular , Prosthesis Design , Postoperative Period , Pseudophakia/physiopathology , Optics and Photonics
18.
J Cataract Refract Surg ; 50(7): 668-675, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38446495

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To describe gender differences in the biometric parameters of a large sample of patients with cataract. Cataract surgery has evolved from a vision restoration to a refractive procedure, and population-based studies are vital to optimize normative databases and postsurgical outcomes. SETTING: Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain. DESIGN: Retrospective single-center observational study. METHODS: The study included 34 589 eyes (20 004 patients with cataract). Biometric data were obtained from IOL Master 700 and Pentacam HR. Linear mixed models were used to account for intereye correlation. HofferQST formula was used to calculate the hypothetical distribution of intraocular lens (IOL) power (arbitrary lens; A = 119.2). RESULTS: Most biometric variables showed significant differences between sexes ( P < .0001), such as 0.53 mm shorter eyes found in females, of which 0.16 mm are explained by shorter aqueous depth. Steeper anterior keratometries (∼0.75 diopter [D]) were found in women, to end up in no difference on anterior astigmatism magnitude, but different orientation ( P < .0001). The distribution of IOL power differed between sexes ( P < .001), with the interquartile range shifting 1 D toward more powerful lenses in women and odds ratio (power >26 D) = 2.26, P < .0001 (Fisher). CONCLUSIONS: Large sample size studies provide smaller margin of error, higher power, and controlled risk of reporting false (negative or positive) findings. Highly significant differences between sexes in ocular biometry were found; this supports the idea that including sex as a parameter in IOL calculation should be explored and may improve results. In addition, the distribution of IOL powers was provided, which may be useful for manufacturers and hospital stock planning.


Subject(s)
Biometry , Lenses, Intraocular , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Female , Aged , Phacoemulsification , Lens Implantation, Intraocular , Middle Aged , Cataract Extraction , Refraction, Ocular/physiology , Sex Factors , Cataract , Aged, 80 and over , Visual Acuity/physiology , Axial Length, Eye/pathology , Optics and Photonics
19.
Am J Ophthalmol ; 262: 237-245, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38452920

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between effective lens position (ELP) and patient characteristics, and to further develop a new intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formula for cataract patients with previous pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: A total of 2793 age-related cataract patients (group 1) and 915 post-PPV cataract patients (group 2) who underwent phacoemulsification with IOL implantation were included. The ELP of 2 groups was compared and the association between ELP and patient characteristics was further evaluated using standardized multivariate regression coefficients. An ensemble artificial intelligence-based ELP prediction model was developed using a training set of 810 vitrectomized eyes, and a thick-lens IOL formula (LISA-PPV) was constructed and compared with 7 existing formulas on an external multi-center testing set of 105 eyes. RESULTS: Compared to eyes with age-related cataract, vitrectomized eyes showed a similar ELP distribution (P = .19), but different standardized coefficients of preoperative biometry for ELP. The standardized coefficients also varied with the type of vitreous tamponade, history of scleral buckling, and ciliary sulcus IOL implantation. The LISA-PPV formula showed the lowest mean and median absolute prediction error (MAE: 0.63 D; MedAE: 0.44 D), and the highest percentages of eyes within ±0.5 D of prediction error (57.14%) in the testing dataset. CONCLUSIONS: The ELP prediction required optimization specifically for vitrectomized eyes based on their biometric and surgical characteristics. The LISA-PPV formula is a useful and accurate tool for determining IOL power in cataract patients with previous PPV (available at http://ppv-iolcalculator.com/).


Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , Biometry , Lens Implantation, Intraocular , Lenses, Intraocular , Optics and Photonics , Phacoemulsification , Vitrectomy , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Male , Female , Aged , Vitrectomy/methods , Biometry/methods , Middle Aged , Visual Acuity/physiology , Aged, 80 and over , Refraction, Ocular/physiology , Cataract/physiopathology , Cataract/complications , Retrospective Studies
20.
ACS Sens ; 9(4): 1799-1808, 2024 04 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38549498

ABSTRACT

Photonic technologies promise to deliver quantitative, multiplex, and inexpensive medical diagnostic platforms by leveraging the highly scalable processes developed for the fabrication of semiconductor microchips. However, in practice, the affordability of these platforms is limited by complex and expensive sample handling and optical alignment. We previously reported the development of a disposable photonic assay that incorporates inexpensive plastic micropillar microfluidic cards for sample delivery. That system as developed was limited to singleplex assays due to its optical configuration. To enable multiplexing, we report a new approach addressing multiplex light I/O, in which the outputs of individual grating couplers on a photonic chip are mapped to fibers in a fiber bundle. As demonstrated in the context of detecting antibody responses to influenza and SARS-CoV-2 antigens in human serum and saliva, this enables multiplexing in an inexpensive, disposable, and compact format.


Subject(s)
Biosensing Techniques , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Biosensing Techniques/methods , Biosensing Techniques/instrumentation , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/immunology , Saliva/chemistry , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Optics and Photonics , Lab-On-A-Chip Devices
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...