Using learning-by-concordance to develop reasoning in epistaxis management with online feedback: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Epistaxis is a recurring cause for referral to emergency departments. Its management can be complex; hence, it is critical to provide appropriate support to Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS) residents to develop clinical reasoning skills to manage such cases. Learning-by-Concordance (LbC) is a recently developed educational tool that encourages learners to think through simulated clinical scenarios. A panel of ENTs provides insightful feedback to residents, reflecting a diversity of opinions about practice. Our study aimed to assess LbC's feasibility and perceived value for training OHNS residents in epistaxis management. METHODS: In this qualitative study, three OHNS surgeons, including two faculty members and one resident, wrote the LbC scenarios. The LbC tool was made available to participants through an online platform. A panel of four OHNS faculty provided feedback on answers to LbC questions. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery residents participated and provided their opinion on the value of this educational tool through an online questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 10 one-hour sessions were required to create and upload the training tool. To provide insightful feedback embedded in the learning tool, the four panelists needed 60 min each. Of the 37 participating residents, 25 (68%) completed the training. Overall satisfaction was high: 88% appreciated the training method, and 92% wanted to use this type of training again. Most residents felt the training enabled them to improve their clinical reasoning when encountering a patient with epistaxis (92%) and their knowledge about epistaxis (96%). CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that OHNS residents could benefit from clinical reasoning exercises with panelist feedback using the LbC approach for clinical presentations that require complex approaches to manage conditions such as epistaxis.

3D-printed temporal bone models for training: Does material transparency matter?

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of 3D-printed temporal bone models with two different material transparencies on trainees' mastoidectomy performance. METHODS: Eleven ORL residents performed two anatomical mastoidectomies with posterior tympanotomy on two 3D-printed models with different transparency and VR simulation training. Participants where divided into two groups based on their experience. Within each group participants were randomized to start with the model printed in a completely opaque material or in a material featuring some degree of transparency. After drilling on 3D-printed models, the participants performed two similar mastoidectomies on human cadavers: one on the left side of one cadaver and one on the right side of another cadaver. After drilling 3D-printed models and cadavers, the final-product performances were evaluated by two experienced raters using the 26-item modified Welling Scale. Participants also evaluated the models using a questionnaire. RESULTS: Overall, the participants performed 25 % better on the 3D-printed models featuring transparency compared to the opaque models (18.6 points vs 14.9 points, mean difference = 3.7, 95 % CI 2.0-5.3, P < 0.001)). This difference in performance was independent of which material the participants had drilled first. In addition, the residents also subjectively rated the transparent model to be closer to cadaver dissection. The experienced group starting with the 3D-printed models scored 21.5 points (95 % CI 20.0-23.1), while the group starting with VR simulation training score 18.4 points (95 % CI 16.6-20.3). CONCLUSION: We propose that material used for 3D-printing temporal bone models should feature some degree of transparency, like natural bone, for trainees to learn and exploit key visual cues during drilling.

Evaluation of the BOPPPS model on otolaryngologic education for five-year undergraduates.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the BOPPPS model (bridge-in, learning objective, pre-test, participatory learning, post-test, and summary) in otolaryngology education for five-year undergraduate students. METHODS: A non-randomized controlled trial was conducted with 167 five-year undergraduate students from Anhui Medical University, who were allocated to an experimental group and a control group. The experimental group received instruction using the BOPPPS model, while the control group underwent traditional teaching methods. The evaluation of the teaching effectiveness was performed through an anonymous questionnaire based on the course evaluation questionnaire. Students' perspectives and self-evaluations were quantified using a five-point Likert scale. Furthermore, students' comprehension of the course content was measured through a comprehensive final examination at the end of the semester. RESULTS: Students in the experimental group reported significantly higher scores in various competencies compared to the control group: planning work (4.27 ± 0.676 vs. 4.03 ± 0.581, P < 0.05), problem-solving skills (4.31 ± 0.624 vs. 4.03 ± 0.559, P < 0.01), teamwork abilities (4.19 ± 0.704 vs. 3.87 ± 0.758, P < 0.05), and analytical skills (4.31 ± 0.719 vs. 4.05 ± 0.622, P < 0.05). They also reported higher motivation for learning (4.48 ± 0.618 vs. 4.09 ± 0.582, P < 0.01). Additionally, students in the experimental group felt more confident tackling unfamiliar problems (4.21 ± 0.743 vs. 3.95 ± 0.636, P < 0.05), had a clearer understanding of teachers' expectations (4.31 ± 0.552 vs. 4.08 ± 0.555, P < 0.05), and perceived more effort from teachers to understand their difficulties (4.42 ± 0.577 vs. 4.13 ± 0.59, P < 0.01). They emphasized comprehension over memorization (3.65 ± 1.176 vs. 3.18 ± 1.065, P < 0.05) and received more helpful feedback (4.40 ± 0.574 vs. 4.08 ± 0.585, P < 0.01). Lecturers were rated better at explaining concepts (4.42 ± 0.539 vs. 4.08 ± 0.619, P < 0.01) and making subjects interesting (4.50 ± 0.546 vs. 4.08 ± 0.632, P < 0.01). Overall, the experimental group expressed higher course satisfaction (4.56 ± 0.542 vs. 4.34 ± 0.641, P < 0.05). In terms of examination performance, the experimental group scored higher on the final examination (87.7 ± 6.7 vs. 84.0 ± 7.7, P < 0.01) and in noun-interpretation (27.0 ± 1.6 vs. 26.1 ± 2.4, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The BOPPPS model emerged as an effective and innovative teaching method, particularly in enhancing students' competencies in otolaryngology education. Based on the findings of this study, educators and institutions were encouraged to consider incorporating the BOPPPS model into their curricula to enhance the learning experiences and outcomes of students.

A qualitative analysis of pediatric otolaryngology fellowship websites.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the availability and breadth of information provided by program-created pediatric otolaryngology fellowship websites as well as the American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology (ASPO) program directory. METHODS: Program-created pediatric otolaryngology fellowship websites and the ASPO directory were evaluated for 16 key criteria deemed to be relevant to fellowship applicants. RESULTS: All 36 ACGME-accredited pediatric otolaryngology fellowship programs had websites that were readily available by Google search, and the ASPO program directory contained direct links to 17 (47.2 %) program-created websites. On average, program-created websites fulfilled 6.9 (43.1 %, range 1-11) and the ASPO directory fulfilled 6.9 (43.1 %, range 3-11) of the 16 key criteria. When utilizing both resources, the average increased to 8.3 (51.2 %) - criteria included program description (94.4 %), location description (30.4 %), fellowship director contact information (94.4 %), program coordinator contact information (72.2 %), teaching responsibilities (68.6 %), call responsibilities/schedule (41.7 %), operative volume (80 %), breadth of surgical exposure (94.4 %), research opportunities (72.2 %), research expectations (63.9 %), current fellow(s) (42.9 %), post-fellowship placement (28.6 %), fellow clinic (28.6 %), medical missions/outreach (20 %), and resident coverage (36.1 %). CONCLUSION: Pediatric otolaryngology fellowship websites as well as program-specific data sheets from ASPO lack many key criteria that would otherwise be valuable to applicants. Inclusion of these criteria could help applicants make a more well-informed decision when applying into pediatric otolaryngology fellowship.

Real-time surgical simulation training for recurrent laryngeal nerve and facial nerve dissection.

BACKGROUND: Head and neck surgical simulation training (SST) is an important part in otolaryngology head and neck surgical education. In this study, we provide a live porcine model for SST in recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) and facial nerve (FN) dissection for otolaryngology head and neck residents. METHODS: A lecture with surgical manual is provided to illustrate the surgical landmarks of pig, and step-by-step procedures for thyroid and parotid surgery, as well as neck dissection. We used 4-month-old pig weighting 32 kg for the SST. The mentor demonstrated result of RLN injury with continuous nerve monitoring. Participants used monopolar stimulation probe (4 pulse/s, 100 µs, 3-8 mA; Medtronic) to identify and intermittent monitor the RLN and FN during the SST. After the dissection course, we conducted a questionnaire survey to check the effectiveness of this training model. RESULTS: Total 30 participants were recruited, including 16 female and 14 male resident doctors. There were 1, 4 and 25 learners for 3rd year, 4th and 5th years residents, respectively. Before this training course, 53 % (16/30) and 63 % (19/30) had successful experience in finding the RLN and FN, respectively. After the SST, all of our participants had successful identify the RLN and FN (p-value <0.01); all had positive response to stimulation and familiar with the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The live porcine model is effectiveness in SST for RLN and FN dissection. Live porcine model with real-time RLN and FN monitoring should be provided for otolaryngology head and neck resident training.

Medical School Characteristics Associated with Matched Otolaryngology Residency Applicants.

OBJECTIVE: Identify which medical schools produce the most otolaryngology residents, and associated characteristics which may contribute to this productivity. DESIGN: The medical school and residency program of each otolaryngology-matched student was identified. Various characteristics for each medical school and residency were compared in univariate and multivariate analysis after adjusting for class size. Percentage of matched students relative to class size was identified and compared for each geographic region. SETTING: Cross-sectional study of publicly available match data from otomatch.com and otolaryngology residency program websites from 2020-2023. PARTICIPANTS: 1411 students from 174 medical schools matched into 126 otolaryngology residencies were identified. RESULTS: Private medical schools (ß = 0.50, p = 0.03), larger otolaryngology departments (ß = 0.01, p = 0.04), and higher U.S. News and World Report (USNWR) ranking (ß = -0.01, p = 0.02) was associated with a greater percentage of otolaryngology-matched students while schools in the Mountain region were associated with a lower percentage of matched students (ß = -1.08, p = 0.02). A difference in percentage of matched students was observed when comparing across all regions (p < 0.01) but no significant differences were observed between any individual regions. The East North Central Region and the Middle Atlantic regions were more likely to match students from their respective regions compared to the Mountain region (OR: 4.98, 95% CI: 1.18, 21.01; OR: 8.20, 95% CI: 1.92, 34.99, respectively). Additionally, the Mountain region was less likely to match students from their own region compared to the Pacific (OR: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.05, 0.90), South Atlantic (OR: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.05, 0.85), and West South Central (OR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.03, 0.67) regions. CONCLUSIONS: Medical school characteristics such as private vs public status, size of otolaryngology department, higher USNWR ranking, and geographic region impact the number of otolaryngology-matched students. Applicants should consider the impact of their geographic region when allocating signals during the residency application process.

Developing and validating a knowledge-based AI assessment system for learning clinical core medical knowledge in otolaryngology.

BACKGROUND: Clinical core medical knowledge (CCMK) learning is essential for medical trainees. Adaptive assessment systems can facilitate self-learning, but extracting experts' CCMK is challenging, especially using modern data-driven artificial intelligence (AI) approaches (e.g., deep learning). OBJECTIVES: This study aims to develop a multi-expert knowledge-aggregated adaptive assessment scheme (MEKAS) using knowledge-based AI approaches to facilitate the learning of CCMK in otolaryngology (CCMK-OTO) and validate its effectiveness through a one-month training program for CCMK-OTO education at a tertiary referral hospital. METHODS: The MEKAS utilized the repertory grid technique and case-based reasoning to aggregate experts' knowledge to construct a representative CCMK base, thereby enabling adaptive assessment for CCMK-OTO training. The effects of longitudinal training were compared between the experimental group (EG) and the control group (CG). Both groups received a normal training program (routine meeting, outpatient/operation room teaching, and classroom teaching), while EG received MEKAS for self-learning. The EG comprised 22 UPGY trainees (6 postgraduate [PGY] and 16 undergraduate [UGY] trainees) and 8 otolaryngology residents (ENT-R); the CG comprised 24 UPGY trainees (8 PGY and 16 UGY trainees). The training effectiveness was compared through pre- and post-test CCMK-OTO scores, and user experiences were evaluated using a technology acceptance model-based questionnaire. RESULTS: Both UPGY (z = -3.976, P < 0.001) and ENT-R (z = -2.038, P = 0.042) groups in EG exhibited significant improvements in their CCMK-OTO scores, while UPGY in CG did not (z = -1.204, P = 0.228). The UPGY group in EG also demonstrated a substantial improvement compared to the UPGY group in CG (z = -4.943, P < 0.001). The EG participants were highly satisfied with the MEKAS system concerning self-learning assistance, adaptive testing, perceived satisfaction, intention to use, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and perceived enjoyment, rating it between an overall average of 3.8 and 4.1 out of 5.0 on all scales. CONCLUSIONS: The MEKAS system facilitates CCMK-OTO learning and provides an efficient knowledge aggregation scheme that can be applied to other medical subjects to efficiently build adaptive assessment systems for CCMK learning. Larger-scale validation across diverse institutions and settings is warranted further to assess MEKAS's scalability, generalizability, and long-term impact.

Association of Medical School Gap Year Research and Degree Programs With Otolaryngology Interview and Match Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether a gap year for either research or a master's degree is associated with interview offers or match outcomes among otolaryngology applicants. METHODS: Using the Texas Seeking Transparency in Application to Residency (Texas STAR) database, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis of otolaryngology applicants from 2018 to 2022. Applicants were stratified based on the presence and type of gap year during medical school. Applicant characteristics, signaling, research productivity, and application costs were analyzed, with primary outcomes including number of interview offers and match status. RESULTS: Among 564 otolaryngology applicant respondents to the Texas STAR survey, 160 (28%) reported a gap year, including 64 (40%) applicants participating in a research year, 65 (41%) completing a Master of Public Health or Science (MPH and MSc), and 31 (19%) completing a Master of Business Administration, Education, or other degree (MBA and MEd). Gap-year applicants who completed a research year or MPH/MSc degree received more interview offers (P < .01) than MBA, MEd applicants, or those without a gap year. Applicants with a research year had the most publications, oral presentations, abstracts, posters, and research experiences (all P < .01). When controlling for USMLE scores, clerkship honors, and applications submitted, applicants completing a research year or an MPH/MSc-degree received increased interview offers (P < .01). No significant differences were seen in expenditures or match rates. CONCLUSIONS: Research and MPH/MSc gap years were associated with increased residency interview offers but not increased match success. Further longitudinal studies are needed to assess how yearlong experiences affect long-term career outcomes.

Regulatory and Implementation Considerations for Artificial Intelligence.

Successful artificial intelligence (AI) implementation is predicated on the trust of clinicians and patients, and is achieved through a culture of responsible use, focusing on regulations, standards, and education. Otolaryngologists can overcome barriers in AI implementation by promoting data standardization through professional societies, engaging in institutional efforts to integrate AI, and developing otolaryngology-specific AI education for both trainees and practitioners.

Standardization, Collaboration, and Education in the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Otolaryngology: The Key to Scalable Impact.

The study delves into the crucial role of standardization, collaboration, and education in the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in otolaryngology. It emphasizes the necessity of large, diverse datasets for effective AI implementation in health care, particularly in otolaryngology, due to its reliance on medical imagery and diverse instruments. The text identifies current barriers, including siloed work in academia and sparse academic-industrial partnerships, while proposing solutions like forming interdisciplinary teams and aligning incentives. Moreover, it discusses the importance of standardizing AI projects through system reporting and advocates for AI education and literacy among otolaryngology practitioners.

Does a junior doctor focused 'Bootcamp' improve the confidence and preparedness of newly appointed ENT registrars to perform their job roles?

BACKGROUND: To assess changes in confidence and preparedness after conducting a 2-day induction bootcamp for novice Ear Nose and Throat (ENT) first year specialty trainee registrars (ST3s) in the United Kingdom (UK). The bootcamp covered common ENT presentations on the ward, and in the elective and emergency settings. METHODS: A total of 32 trainees (ST3 or research fellow) voluntarily registered via an online application form to the Southern ST3 accelerated learning course bootcamp through ENT UK. ENT UK is a membership body that supports ENT trainees throughout their careers. They completed a two-day bootcamp that was hosted at St Mary's Hospital, London and 10 skills sessions were delivered by either a senior ENT registrar or an ENT consultant. A pre-session questionnaire was distributed to all participants and a post-session questionnaire was provided that assessed the changes in confidence and preparedness of the participants, if any. The responses were scored by a 10-point Likert scale. Only participants who fully completed the pre and post questionnaire were included, which was 29 in total. RESULTS: Participants self-reported a significant increase in confidence (p < 0.001) and preparedness (p < 0.001) following the bootcamp course. The greatest improvements in comparison to all other stations were self-preparedness in the rigid bronchoscopy station and self-confidence in the sphenopalatine artery (SPA) ligation station. CONCLUSION: The use of a two-day bootcamp improved confidence and preparedness of managing common ENT presentations in the ward, elective and emergency settings for ENT ST3s. It provides a useful adjunct in the acquisition of technical and non-technical skills alongside the traditional surgical apprenticeship. In the future, more work is required to assess the impact of bootcamps on patient outcomes and long-term benefits on trainees' skill retention and clinical proficiency.

Concurrent Pregnancies and Parental Leaves Among Trainees in a Residency Program.

This Viewpoint shares the experience of a single Otolaryngology−Head & Neck Surgery residency program that faced the scheduling challenges of having nearly a quarter of its residents expecting a child and on parental leave.

Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery resident and medical school characteristics: Current paradigm amidst changing application criteria.

PURPOSE: To determine the characteristics of current US Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (Oto-HNS) residents and their medical school. METHODS: Data were manually collected between Dec 2022 and Jan 2023 for 1649 residents attending 163 US-based ACGME accredited Oto-HNS residency programs, reflecting the 2018-2022 cohort. All data were collected from publicly available sources including residency and medical school program websites, web of science, and professional networking sites (ex: LinkedIn, Doximity). Data were analyzed to determine the "feeder" schools which contributed the greatest number and percent of residents. Using univariable linear regression models, we characterized factors which were associated with feeder school status. RESULTS: Of 1649 residents analyzed, 364 (22 %) matched to their home program and 918 (56 %) stayed in the region of their medical school. The median [IQR] number of published papers and abstracts was 5 [3, 9] with an h-index of 2 [1,4]. Factors associated with producing a greater percent of Oto-HNS residents include presence of an interest group, presence of a home program, USNWR research rank of the medical school, Doximity reputation rank of the home residency program, average pre-residency h-index of the school's graduates, and total NIH research funding (each p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In the changing landscape of residency applications after the USMLE Step 1 exam's transition in January 2022 to pass/fail scoring, it is important to objectively characterize current Oto-HNS residents. Findings from this study will inform prospective residents and residency programs seeking to improve access to Oto-HNS. Future small-scale studies may help further identify driving factors within medical school curricula.

Implementing a formal curriculum on surgical ethics and palliative care for otolaryngology residents.

OBJECTIVE: Residents are faced with ethical issues every day but most residency curriculums do not routinely include formal ethics skills training. In order to address this, a comprehensive curriculum on ethics and surgical palliative care was implemented for otolaryngology residents. METHODS: An 8-h ethics didactics curriculum was designed in collaboration with our institution's Institute of Ethics. Varied strategies were used to cover basic principles and practical skills. Anonymous assessments were completed by learners at 3 points during the curriculum on a 5-point scale. RESULTS: Nine residents were surveyed. Prior to the curriculum, a large majority of residents (85 %) expressed little to no familiarity with basic ethical principles. There was statistically significant improvement in understanding of and familiarity with bioethics topics, including the four principles of bioethics (Δ = 2.4, p = 0.004). There was also statistically significant improvement in comfort with the implementation of ethical decision making and palliative care skills, including with difficult conversations with patients (Δ = 1.3, p = 0.03). Participation in sessions was excellent with positive qualitative feedback. CONCLUSION: An interactive curriculum in ethics and palliative care can be engaging and practical for busy surgical residents, with measurable improvement in comfort with challenging cases and ethical, patient-centered care.

Relationship between otolaryngology interest groups and residency match results.

BACKGROUND: Many students have limited exposure to otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (OTOHNS) throughout medical school, limiting recruitment of medical students early in their medical careers. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between otolaryngology interest groups (OIGs) at medical schools and percentage of students matching into OTOHNS residency programs. To characterize specific aspects of OIGs that may impact the percentage of students matching into OTOHNS residency programs from a given medical school. METHODS: Data was obtained from web searches of 141 accredited U.S. allopathic medical schools to see if they possessed OIGs. Information on the various activities and opportunities that OIGs participated in was collected through medical school websites. 2020 NRMP® match results data were obtained. RESULTS: Web searches found that 73 % (103 out of 141) of U.S. allopathic medical schools have OIGs. Medical schools with OIGs were associated with a 35 % increase in the median percentage of OTOHNS matches (P = 0.022). Of the 103 medical schools with OIGs, 53 % (55) of the schools had information on their websites describing activities and opportunities that their OIGs participate in. OIGs with research and/or mentorship opportunities were associated with increases in OTOHNS matches by 32 % (P = 0.043) and 83 % (P = 0.012), respectively. CONCLUSION: The presence of an OIG at a medical school is associated with an increased percentage of students matching into OTOHNS from that medical school. OIGs that provide research or mentorship opportunities are associated with an increased percentage of students matching into OTOHNS from those medical schools.

The role of artificial intelligence in training ENT residents: a survey on ChatGPT, a new method of investigation.

Objective: The primary focus of this study was to analyze the adoption of ChatGPT among Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) trainees, encompassing its role in scientific research and personal study. We examined in which year ENT trainees become involved in clinical research and how many scientific investigations they have been engaged in. Methods: An online survey was distributed to ENT residents employed in Italian University Hospitals. Results: Out of 609 Italian ENT trainees, 181 (29.7%) responded to the survey. Among these, 67.4% were familiar with ChatGPT, and 18.9% of them used artificial intelligence as a tool for research and study. In all, 32.6% were not familiar with ChatGPT and its functions. Within our sample, there was an increasing trend of participation by ENT trainees in scientific publications throughout their training. Conclusions: ChatGPT remains relatively unfamiliar and underutilised in Italy, even though it could be a valuable and efficient tool for ENT trainees, providing quick access for study and research through both personal computers and smartphones.

Conceptualizing Fit in Surgical Residency Selection: The Experience in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Fit is a crucial factor in surgical residency selection, but how this abstract concept is applied in practice is poorly understood. Person-environment (PE) fit theory suggests that there are multiple fit domains that can clarify usage: person-job, person-organization, and person-workgroup fit. We used PE fit theory to explore how otolaryngology residency selection committee (RSC) members operationalize the concept of fit. DESIGN: One-hour focus groups were conducted in November 2022. Interview questions explored participants' definitions and uses of fit in the resident selection process. Transcripts were analyzed using directed qualitative content analysis to generate themes and evaluate how these align with PE fit domains. SETTING: Society of University Otolaryngologists Annual Meeting breakout session in November 2022. PARTICIPANTS: 21 RSC members from 20 different otolaryngology-head and neck surgery departments participated in three seven-person focus groups. RESULTS: Participants described aspects of fit that aligned with PE fit domains. Person-job included how applicants fit as both surgeons and residents. Person-organization included how applicants fit with the program's characteristics, program's mission, and the local community. Person-workgroup emphasized how applicants fit with current residents. Various challenges in the selection process limited the extent to which PE fit was operationalized, including 1) ambiguous uses of fit, 2) unique features of the match process, 3) lack of outcomes data for selection decisions, and 4) interactions with diversity, equity, and inclusion goals. CONCLUSIONS: Fit manifests in various ways during the surgical residency selection process that parallel domains of PE fit theory. Recommendations are made to assist programs in using fit in resident selection, including clearly articulating definitions of fit to increase transparency in conversations. Further work on selection challenges is needed to maximize the utility of fit in practice.

The Use of Artificial Intelligence to Improve Readability of Otolaryngology Patient Education Materials.

OBJECTIVE: The recommended readability of health education materials is at the sixth-grade level. Artificial intelligence (AI) large language models such as the newly released ChatGPT4 might facilitate the conversion of patient-education materials at scale. We sought to ascertain whether online otolaryngology education materials meet recommended reading levels and whether ChatGPT4 could rewrite these materials to the sixth-grade level. We also wished to ensure that converted materials were accurate and retained sufficient content. METHODS: Seventy-one articles from patient educational materials published online by the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery were selected. Articles were entered into ChatGPT4 with the prompt "translate this text to a sixth-grade reading level." Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES) and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) were determined for each article before and after AI conversion. Each article and conversion were reviewed for factual inaccuracies, and each conversion was reviewed for content retention. RESULTS: The 71 articles had an initial average FKGL of 11.03 and FRES of 46.79. After conversion by ChatGPT4, the average FKGL across all articles was 5.80 and FRES was 77.27. Converted materials provided enough detail for patient education with no factual errors. DISCUSSION: We found that ChatGPT4 improved the reading accessibility of otolaryngology online patient education materials to recommended levels quickly and effectively. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Physicians can determine whether their patient education materials exceed current recommended reading levels by using widely available measurement tools, and then apply AI dialogue platforms to modify materials to more accessible levels as needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 5.

Safety and efficacy of three-dimensional versus two-dimensional endoscopy in otolaryngology surgery and training: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Three-dimensional (3D) endoscopy has been developed to provide depth perception to allow for improved visualisation during otolaryngology surgery. We conducted a systematic review to determine the surgical safety and efficacy of 3D endoscopy in comparison to two-dimensional (2D) endoscopy in performing otolaryngology procedures, and the role of 3D endoscopy as a training tool for novice otolaryngology surgeons. METHODS: Primary studies were identified through MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science databases, which were searched for articles published through June 2022 that compared the outcomes of 2D and 3D endoscopy in otolaryngology surgical procedures or otolaryngology-relevant simulations. Candidate articles were independently reviewed by two authors. RESULTS: A total of 18 full-text articles met inclusion criteria for this study. In clinical trials (n = 8 studies, 362 subjects), there were no significant differences in performance time, intraoperative or postoperative complications with 3D endoscopes when compared to 2D. In simulation studies (n = 10 studies, 336 participants), 3D endoscopes demonstrated a decreased error rate (n = 5 studies) and shorter performance time (n = 3 studies). Studies also reported improved depth perception (n = 14 studies) and visualisation preference (n = 5 studies) with 3D over 2D systems. The 3D systems were found to have a shorter learning curve and better manoeuvrability among novice surgeons. CONCLUSION: 3D endoscopy showed equivalent safety and efficacy compared to 2D endoscopy in otolaryngology surgery. The improved depth perception and performance for novices using 3D endoscopes suggests the technology may be superior to 2D endoscopes as a training tool for otolaryngology surgeons.