Unmasking an unusual presentation of Hodgkin's lymphoma masquerading as ocular inflammation: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) is an extremely rare cause of ocular inflammation that is usually not considered in the typical workup of uveitis and other eye diseases. A few cases of ocular inflammation were reported previously showcasing HL with absence of typical symptoms of HL at presentation. Acknowledging the potential ocular inflammation associated with HL can prompt ophthalmologists to broaden their diagnostic approach and collaborate with internal medicine departments to investigate this rare yet significant etiology. CASE PRESENTATION: A 17-year-old Caucasian woman presenting unilateral panuveitis was later diagnosed with HL. The ocular findings were non-necrotizing scleritis, anterior uveitis, vitritis, white/yellowish chorioretinal lesions, papillitis and vasculitis. A left supra-clavicular lymph node biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of nodular sclerosing Hodgkin's lymphoma stage IIB. Other causes of uveitis were excluded. Chemotherapy led to remission of the disease and the ocular lesions became quiescent with persistent pigmented chorioretinal scars. CONCLUSIONS: Hodgkin's lymphoma should be considered in the differential diagnosis of diseases that can occasionally be revealed by unilateral ocular inflammation. A comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach is key to properly assessing such cases.

A Case of Refractory Posterior Scleritis with Marked Retinochoroidal Detachment Associated with Panuveitis.

An 84-year-old man presented with decreased right-eye visual acuity. Upon initial examination, the rightand left-eye visual acuities were 0.03 and 1.2, respectively; moreover, the right- and left-eye intraocular pressure was 12 mmHg and 13 mmHg, respectively. Examination revealed a shallow anterior chamber of the right eye, anterior chamber inflammation, vitreous opacity, and marked retinochoroidal detachment. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) revealed retinal detachment (RD) and choroidal folds; moreover, B-scan ultrasonography (B-scan) showed RD as well as thickened sclera with fluid in Tenon's space. Fluorescent fundus angiography revealed hyperfluorescence in the optic disc and vascular hyperpermeability in the right eye. The left eye lacked extra-ocular symptoms or abnormalities. The right ocular axis measured 23.4 mm with no apparent subretinal fluid migration due to positional changes. Accordingly, the patient was diagnosed with panuveitis associated with posterior scleritis and immediately started on 40 mg prednisolone, which improved his symptoms. However, at 3 post-treatment months, choroidal folds were observed and was restarted on 20 mg prednisolone. The choroidal folds subsequently disappeared, with a current visual acuity of 0.3 in the right eye and no recurrence. Our findings indicated the utility of accurate diagnosis of posterior scleritis by B-scan and prompt systemic steroid administration.

Fundus Autofluorescence in Posterior and Panuveitis-An Under-Estimated Imaging Technique: A Review and Case Series.

Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) is a prompt and non-invasive imaging modality helpful in detecting pathological abnormalities within the retina and the choroid. This narrative review and case series provides an overview on the current application of FAF in posterior and panuveitis. The literature was reviewed for articles on lesion characteristics on FAF of specific posterior and panuveitis entities as well as benefits and limitations of FAF for diagnosing and monitoring disease. FAF characteristics are described for non-infectious and infectious uveitis forms as well as masquerade syndromes. Dependent on the uveitis entity, FAF is of diagnostic value in detecting disease and following the clinical course. Currently available FAF modalities which differ in excitation wavelengths can provide different pathological insights depending on disease entity and activity. Further studies on the comparison of FAF modalities and their individual value for uveitis diagnosis and monitoring are warranted.

Extranodal Rosai-Dorfman disease manifesting as Sjögren's syndrome combined with panuveitis and hypertrophic pachymeningitis: a case report and review of literature.

Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD) is a rare non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis characterized by massive lymphadenopathy and systemic extranodal lesions. We present the case of a 28-year-old woman who presented with recurrent blurred vision in her right eye for 3 months. She developed blindness and atrophy in her left eye a decade prior to presentation. She subsequently developed headache, fever, and impaired mental status. Cranial magnetic resonance imaging indicated hypertrophic pachymeningitis (HP), and 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-2-d-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography revealed significant FDG uptake in the left dura mater. Autoimmune testing revealed elevated anti-nuclear, anti-SS-A, and anti-SS-B antibody levels. Incisional biopsy of the atrophic eyeball revealed RDD with marked polyclonal plasmacytosis. The patient was diagnosed with RDD accompanied by multisystem involvement, including Sjögren's syndrome (SS), panuveitis, and HP. Treatment with methylprednisolone for several weeks resulted in significant improvement. This is the first reported case of RDD presenting with SS in combination with panuveitis and HP. Although RDD is rarely diagnosed in young patients, interdisciplinary collaboration is essential to prevent a delayed diagnosis.

Long-term clinical outcomes of patients with sympathetic ophthalmia.

PURPOSE: To present the long-term clinical outcomes of patients with sympathetic ophthalmia (SO). METHODS: Retrospective review of patients' medical files between 2002 and 2022. RESULTS: Included were seven patients (four males). The mean ± SD age at presentation was 37.9 ± 22.5 years. Four patients had co-morbidities: three had diabetes mellitus type 2 and one had Turner Syndrome. Trauma was the inciting event in six patients and postoperative endophthalmitis in one patient. Decreased visual acuity (VA) was the leading symptom in the sympathizing eye and all of the patients presented with panuveitis. The mean ± SD interval between the triggering incident and the onset of SO in six cases was 4.3 ± 4.2 months. One case presented 30 years following the eye injury. Five patients underwent enucleation/evisceration of the exciting eye. The mean ± SD presenting LogMAR BCVA in the sympathizing eye was 0.57 ± 0.82, and the final LogMAR BCVA was 0.61 ± 0.95. Inflammation was completely controlled in 5 patients at a mean ± SD of 8.55 ± 9.21 months following the institution of immunomodulatory therapy, and it was partially controlled in 2 patients. VA deteriorated in all 3 diabetic patients and improved or remained stable in the 4 young and healthy patients. The mean ± SD follow-up period after achieving drug-free remission was 28 ± 22.8 months. The mean ± SD follow-up time was 6.8 ± 5.6 years. CONCLUSIONS: SO is one of the most sight-threatening conditions, affecting the healthy eye. In this cohort, the favorable visual outcome was especially seen in young and healthy individuals. Visual prognosis is directly related to prompt diagnosis and treatment.

OUTCOMES OF INFECTIOUS PANUVEITIS ASSOCIATED WITH SIMULTANEOUS MULTI-POSITIVE OCULAR FLUID POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION.

PURPOSE: To evaluate features of infectious panuveitis associated with multiple pathogens detected by ocular fluid sampling. METHODS: Single-center, retrospective, consecutive case series of patients with aqueous/vitreous polymerase chain reaction testing with >1 positive result in a single sample from 2001 to 2021. RESULTS: Of 1,588 polymerase chain reaction samples, 28 (1.76%) were positive for two pathogens. Most common pathogens were cytomegalovirus (n = 16, 57.1%) and Epstein-Barr virus (n = 13, 46.4%), followed by varicella zoster virus (n = 8, 28.6%), Toxoplasma gondii (n = 6, 21.4%), herpes simplex virus 2 (n = 6, 21.4%), herpes simplex virus 1 (n = 6, 21.4%), and Toxocara (n = 1, 3.6%). Mean initial and final visual acuity (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) were 1.3 ± 0.9 (Snellen ∼20/400) and 1.3 ± 1.1 (Snellen ∼20/400), respectively. Cytomegalovirus-positive eyes (n = 16, 61.5%) had a mean final visual acuity of 0.94 ± 1.1 (Snellen ∼20/175), whereas cytomegalovirus-negative eyes (n = 10, 38%) had a final visual acuity of 1.82 ± 1.0 (Snellen ∼20/1,320) ( P < 0.05). Main clinical features included intraocular inflammation (100%), retinal whitening (84.6%), immunosuppression (65.4%), retinal hemorrhage (38.5%), and retinal detachment (34.6%). CONCLUSION: Cytomegalovirus or Epstein-Barr virus were common unique pathogens identified in multi-PCR-positive samples. Most patients with co-infection were immunosuppressed with a high rate of retinal detachment and poor final visual acuity. Cytomegalovirus-positive eyes had better visual outcomes compared with cytomegalovirus-negative eyes.

Seasonal Hyperacute Panuveitis (SHAPU) in Bhutan.

PURPOSE: To report the first series of Seasonal Hyperacute Pan Uveitis (SHAPU) from Bhutan. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the patients with clinically diagnosed SHAPU treated in the referral center in the last 5 years. Data included demographics (age, sex, laterality), region, time of presentation (year, season) and treatment received. RESULTS: The series included 3 males and 2 females. The mean age was 16 years. Three patients had presented in autumn of 2021, and two in autumn of 2019. Four patients presented within 2 weeks of the onset of symptoms. All patients had either exposure or contact with white moths. All patients presented with unilateral sudden painless reduction in vision and low Intraocular pressure. Four patients required vitrectomy. The final visual acuity of 3 patients was >6/36, and one patient was 6/60. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: The time of presentation and early treatment intervention are crucial in achieving good visual prognosis in SHAPU.

An Unusual Manifestation of Brucella-Associated Uveitis in a Young Male Patient.

This is a unique case of retinoschisis as an ocular manifestation of brucellosis. A 38-year-old male presented with recurrent episodes of bilateral eye redness, predominately in his left eye. His visual acuity was not affected, and he did not report any other symptoms. On slit lamp examination, binocular Koeppe nodules of the iris and cells in the left anterior chamber were observed. Fundoscopy followed by meticulous multimodal imaging confirmed left inferior retinoschisis. The patient was diagnosed with panuveitis, and a series of laboratory examinations revealed positive anti-IgM Brucella antibodies. Ocular brucellosis can cause variable, atypical, and serious presentations, hence, early diagnosis is paramount to avoid complications.

A case of panuveitis caused by caterpillar setae.

INTRODUCTION: Panuveitis is a serious inflammatory disease. Setae are fibers produced by many insects and plants. Many case reports have described caterpillar and spider fibers entering the eye. These hairs are covered with tiny barbs that help them enter and migrate into the eye tissue, leading to severe inflammation. Normally, they are buried mainly in the conjunctiva and cornea. However, in the present case, they entered the posterior segment of the eye, which is very rare. CASE DESCRIPTION: A female patient presented with a complaint of repeated foreign body sensation, redness, pain, and photophobia in the left eye for 9 years following initial exposure to caterpillars. She visited the doctor in January after aggravation of symptoms. Slit-lamp examination, ultrasound biomicroscopy, ultrasound B-scan, fluorescein angiography, and indocyanine green angiography revealed the presence of a foreign body in the vitreous, which caused discomfort in the patient's left eye and subsequently, panuveitis of the left eye. The symptoms improved significantly after foreign body removal using vitrectomy. Microscopic examination revealed that the foreign body was caterpillar setae. CONCLUSION: Clinicians should be more vigilant about history of contact with caterpillars while examining uveitis that has recurred for many years. Identification of the root cause of the disease can ensure better treatment.

Clinical Features and Course in Patients Diagnosed with Ocular Sarcoidosis without Previously Known Systemic Disease at a Tertiary Referral Center in Turkey.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the ocular features, course, and prognosis of uveitis in the ocular sarcoidosis (OS) subgroups without previously known systemic sarcoidosis. METHODS: Ninety-one eyes of 49 patients were included. Definite OS patients were classified as group 1 (n = 15), presumed OS patients as group 2 (n = 15), and probable OS patients as group 3 (n = 19). RESULTS: The most common presentation of OS was panuveitis in all groups. During the follow-up, bilateral ocular involvement was observed in 85.7% of the patients. The most common extraocular involvement was pulmonary involvement, which was detected in 61.2% of the patients at the time of diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Ophthalmologists should be aware that uveitis may be the first sign of systemic sarcoidosis. In all subgroups of OS, uveitis tends to be bilateral and the most common type is panuveitis. Therefore, the eye without obvious clinical findings should be carefully evaluated clinically and angiographically.

Encefalitis límbica secundaria a neuro-Behçet: una presentación insólita / Limbic encephalitis secondary to neuro-Behçet disease: an uncommon presentation

Introducción: La encefalitis límbica (EL) puede tener un amplio abanico de etiologías, más frecuentemente la infecciosa (sobre todo viral) o autoinmune. La enfermedad de Behçet (EB) puede presentarse con manifestaciones neurológicas heterogéneas. Sin embargo, la EL no se considera una presentación típica del neuro-Behçet (NB). Caso clínico: Un varón de 40 años consultó por cefalea de novo subaguda, problemas de memoria y apatía. La anamnesis por sistemas reveló una historia no conocida previamente de aftas orales recurrentes durante años, fiebre y afectación general reciente, así como un episodio de panuveítis bilateral cuatro meses antes de la presentación. Su exploración general y neurológica reveló febrícula, una afta oral aislada, amnesia anterógrada y signos de vasculitis retiniana bilateral. La resonancia magnética mostró un patrón de afectación de meningoencefalitis límbica y su líquido cefalorraquídeo presentaba inflamación mononuclear. El paciente cumplía los criterios diagnósticos de la EB. Considerando que la EL es una presentación muy rara del NB, se buscaron exhaustivamente y se excluyeron otras etiologías alternativas, incluyendo las encefalitis infecciosas, autoinmunes y paraneoplásicas. En consecuencia, el paciente se diagnosticó de NB y mostró una buena recuperación con tratamiento inmunosupresor. Discusión: Sólo dos casos de NB con presentación en forma de EL se han publicado previamente. Comunicamos el tercer caso de esta rara manifestación clínica de la EB y lo comparamos con los dos anteriores, con el objetivo de destacar dicha asociación y contribuir a expandir el rico espectro clínico del NB.(AU)

Introduction: Limbic encephalitis (LE) can have a wide range of etiologies, most frequently infectious (especially viral) or autoimmune. Behçet’s disease (BD) can present with heterogeneous neurological manifestations. However, LE is not considered a typical presentation of neuro-Behçet’s disease (NBD). Case report: A 40-years-old male presented with new-onset subacute headaches, memory problems and apathy. A review of systems revealed an unrecorded past history of recurrent oral sores for years, recent malaise and fever, as well as an episode of bilateral panuveitis four months before presentation. His general and neurologic examination revealed slight fever, an isolated oral aphtha, anterograde amnesia and signs of bilateral retinal vasculitis. Brain magnetic resonance imaging displayed a pattern of limbic meningoencephalitis, and his cerebrospinal fluid showed mononuclear inflammation. The patient met BD diagnostic criteria. Considering LE is a very rare presentation of NBD, alternative etiologies were thoroughly assessed and excluded, including infectious, autoimmune and paraneoplastic encephalitis. Therefore, he was diagnosed with NBD, and he recovered well after immunosuppression. Discussion: Only two cases of NBD presenting with LE have been previously reported. We report a third case of this rare presentation and compare it with the previous two. We aim to highlight this association and contribute to enlarge the rich clinical spectrum of NBD.(AU)

Recomendaciones SER sobre el tratamiento de la uveítis / SER recommendations for the treatment of uveitis

Objetivo: Elaborar recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia disponible y el consenso de expertos para el manejo terapéutico de los pacientes con uveítis no infecciosas, no neoplásicas y no asociadas a enfermedad desmielinizante. Métodos: Se identificaron preguntas clínicas de investigación relevantes para el objetivo del documento, reformuladas en formato PICO (paciente, intervención, comparación, outcome o desenlace) por un panel de expertos seleccionados en base a su experiencia en el área. Se realizó una revisión sistemática de la evidencia, graduándose de acuerdo a los criterios Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). Subsecuentemente, se formularon las recomendaciones. Resultados: Se seleccionaron tres preguntas PICO, referentes a uveítis anteriores, no anteriores y complicadas con edema macular. Se formularon un total de 19 recomendaciones con base en la evidencia encontrada y/o en el consenso de expertos. Conclusiones: Se presenta el primer documento oficial de la Sociedad Española de Reumatología de recomendaciones para el tratamiento de las uveítis. Pueden aplicarse directamente al sistema sanitario español como herramienta de ayuda y homogenización terapéutica.(AU)

Objective: To develop evidence-based expert-consensus recommendations for the management of non-infectious, non-neoplastic, non-demyelinating disease associated uveitis. Methods: Clinical research questions relevant to the objective of the document were identified, and reformulated into PICO format (patient, intervention, comparison, outcome) by a panel of experts selected based on their experience in the field. A systematic review of the available evidence was conducted, and evidence was graded according to GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) criteria. Subsequently, recommendations were developed. Results: Three PICO questions were constructed referring to uveitis anterior, non-anterior and complicated with macular edema. A total of 19 recommendations were formulated, based on the evidence found and/or expert consensus. Conclusions: Here we present the first official recommendations of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology for the treatment of non-infectious and non-demyelinating disease associated uveitis. They can be directly applied to the Spanish healthcare system as a tool for assistance and therapeutic homogenisation.(AU)

Involvement of the systemic microcirculation in pediatric uveitis.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric uveitis is a severe inflammatory ocular condition that can lead to sight-threatening complications and can negatively impact quality of life. The retinal microcirculation is often affected in intermediate uveitis and panuveitis. Here, we examined the extraocular (i.e., systemic) microcirculation in pediatric uveitis cases and healthy controls using nailfold capillaroscopy (NFC). METHODS: We performed NFC in 119 children with noninfectious uveitis and 25 healthy pediatric controls, and assessed the following parameters: capillary density (number of capillaries/mm), dilated capillaries (apex > 20 µm), avascular area, the presence of microhemorrhages, and capillary morphology. Differences in NFC parameters between cases and controls were calculated using regression analysis after adjusting for age and sex. RESULTS: The mean (± SD) age of the patient group was 13.7 (± 3) years, with 56% females; 46%, 18%, and 36% of cases presented as anterior uveitis, intermediate uveitis, and panuveitis, respectively, with an overall mean disease duration of 4.7 (± 4.0) years. Compared to the control group, the pediatric uveitis cases had a significantly higher number of dilated capillaries/mm and a higher prevalence of ramified capillaries. Moreover, compared to the control group the intermediate uveitis cases had a significantly higher number of dilated capillaries, whereas the anterior uveitis cases had a lower capillary density and a higher prevalence of ramified capillaries. CONCLUSIONS: Children with uveitis without systemic disease can present with changes in systemic microcirculation. These changes vary amongst the subtypes of uveitis.

Clinical features of infectious uveitis in a Tunisian population.

INTRODUCTION: Infectious uveitis (IU), one of the main causes of ocular inflammation in Tunisia, has various etiologies and clinical presentations. AIM: To report the causes and clinical features of IU in a Tunisian population. METHODS: Patients with IU referred to our department from February 2019 to January 2022 were included in a retrospective observational study. Ophthalmic examination and appropriate ancillary tests were performed. RESULTS: Eighty eyes of 63 patients were included (37 female and 26 male). The mean age was 45 years. IU was unilateral in 43 cases, bilateral in 17, and unilateral alternating in three cases. Panuveitis was the most common anatomic location (35% of cases) followed by posterior (31%), anterior (18 eyes), intermediate (6 eyes) and anterior and intermediate uveitis (3 eyes). Non granulomatous uveitis (55%) occurred more frequently than granulomatous uveitis (45%). Etiologies were dominated by bacterial infections (29 patients; 46%), mainly tuberculosis (23 patients), followed by viruses (19 patients), mainly Herpes simplex virus. Fungal infection was found in one patient, while parasites accounted for 14 cases, mostly toxoplasmosis. Mean initial diagnostic delay was 16 months. The most common complications included occlusive retinal vasculitis (19 eyes), cataract (17 eyes), cystoid macular edema (17 eyes) and papilledema (15 eyes). CONCLUSION: This study highlighted the causes and clinical features of IU in our setting. Tuberculosis remains one of its most frequent etiologies in Tunisia. However, a larger multicenter national study would allow a more precise evaluation.

Ocular syphilis on the rise: a 10-year analysis from 2010 to 2020.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the incidence of ocular syphilis as well as diagnostic parameters, comorbidities, and visual outcomes over a 10-year time period in West Virginia. METHODS: A retrospective chart review included 25 eyes of 17 patients with ocular syphilis between 2010 and 2020. RESULTS: The incidence of systemic syphilis at a large tertiary referral center has increased from 27 cases in 2010 to 105 cases in 2020. Seventeen patients were identified with ocular syphilis. Bilaterality was present in 47.1% of cases. In this study, 70.6% of patients were male and 29.4% were female. The median age of presentation was 40.2 years (range 21-63). Panuveitis was the most common (60.0%) followed by isolated anterior uveitis (16.0%), chorioretinitis (12.0%), inner retinitis (4.0%), and papillitis (8.0%). Forty percent of patients had visual acuity worse than 20/400 on presentation. Post-treatment visual acuity improved in all patients. Rapid plasma reagin (RPR) and Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TP-PA) tests were positive in 84.6% and 100% of cases, respectively. CSF venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL) was positive in 36.4%, CSF pleocytosis was present in 72.7%, and elevated CSF protein was observed in 81.8%. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection was present in 31.3%. A majority of patients experienced maculopapular rash and/or history of genital chancre. The anatomic classification of presenting uveitis (anterior, intermediate, posterior, and panuveitis) did not correlate with clinical variables including age, gender, HIV status, serologic test, presence of rash, or year of diagnosis (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Ocular syphilis is becoming increasingly prevalent and can present with a variety of ocular findings; therefore, it should be considered in the differential diagnosis for patients with ocular inflammation. Visual prognosis is excellent with timely diagnosis and treatment.

Corticosteroid implants for chronic non-infectious uveitis.

BACKGROUND: Uveitis is a term used to describe a group of intraocular inflammatory diseases. Uveitis is the fifth most common cause of vision loss in high-income countries, with the highest incidence of disease in the working-age population. Corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment for all subtypes of non-infectious uveitis. They can be administered orally, topically with drops, by periocular (around the eye) or intravitreal (inside the eye) injection, or by surgical implantation. OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and safety of steroid implants in people with chronic non-infectious posterior uveitis, intermediate uveitis, and panuveitis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register), MEDLINE Ovid, Embase, PubMed, LILACS, and three trials registries to November 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials comparing either fluocinolone acetonide (FA) or dexamethasone (DEX) intravitreal implants with standard-of-care therapy or sham procedures, with at least six months of follow-up after treatment. We included studies that enrolled participants of all ages, who had chronic non-infectious posterior uveitis, intermediate uveitis, or panuveitis with vision that was better than hand-motion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We applied standard Cochrane methodology. MAIN RESULTS: We included data from four trials (683 participants, 907 eyes) that compared corticosteroid implants with either sham or standard-of-care therapy. Study characteristics and risk of bias Of the two trials that compared corticosteroid implants with sham procedure, one examined a 0.18 mg FA implant, and the other, a 0.7 mg DEX implant. The other two trials compared a 0.59 mg FA implant with standard-of-care therapy, which included systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressive medications, if needed. Considering improvement in visual acuity, we assessed the four trials to be at either low risk, or with some concerns of risk of bias across all domains. Findings Using sham procedure as control, combined results at the six-month primary time point suggested that corticosteroid implants may decrease the risk of uveitis recurrence by 60% (relative risk [RR] 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30 to 0.54; 2 trials, 282 participants; low-certainty evidence); and lead to a greater improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; mean difference [MD] 0.15 logMAR, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.24; 1 trial, 153 participants; low-certainty evidence). Evidence based on a single-study report (146 participants) suggested that steroid implants may have no effects on visual functioning quality of life, measured on the National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (MD 2.85, 95%CI -3.64 to 9.34; 1 trial, 146 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Using standard-of care therapy as control, combined estimates at the 24-month primary time point suggested that corticosteroid implants were likely to decrease the risk of recurrence of uveitis by 54% (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.60; 2 trials, 619 eyes). Combined estimates at 24 months also suggested that steroid implants may have little to no effects on improving BCVA (MD 0.05 logMAR, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.12; 2 trials, 619 eyes; low-certainty evidence). Evidence based on a single-study report (232 participants) suggested that steroid implants may have minimal clinical effects on visual functioning (MD 4.64, 95% CI 0.13 to 9.15; 1 trial, 232 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); physical functioning (SF-36 physical subscale MD 2.95, 95% CI 0.55 to 5.35; 1 trial, 232 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); or mental health (SF-36 mental subscale MD 3.65, 95% CI 0.52 to 6.78; 1 trial, 232 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); but not on EuroQoL (MD 6.17, 95% CI 1.87 to 10.47; 1 trial, 232 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); or EuroQoL-5D scale (MD 0.02, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.08; 1 trial, 232 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Adverse effects Compared with sham procedures, corticosteroid implants may slightly increase the risk of cataract formation (RR 2.69, 95% CI 1.17 to 6.18; 1 trial, 90 eyes; low-certainty evidence), but not the risk of cataract progression (RR 2.00, 95% CI 0.65 to 6.12; 1 trial, 117 eyes; low-certainty evidence); or the need for surgery (RR 2.98, 95% CI 0.82 to 10.81; 1 trial, 180 eyes; low-certainty evidence), during up to 12 months of follow-up. These implants may increase the risk of elevated intraocular pressure ([IOP] RR 2.81, 95% CI 1.42 to 5.56; 2 trials, 282 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); and the need for IOP-lowering eyedrops (RR 1.85, 95% CI 1.05 to 3.25; 2 trials, 282 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); but not the need for IOP-lowering surgery (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.13 to 4.17; 2 trials, 282 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Evidence comparing the 0.59 mg FA implant with standard-of-care suggested that the implant may increase the risk of cataract progression (RR 2.71, 95% CI 2.06 to 3.56; 2 trials, 210 eyes; low-certainty evidence); and the need for surgery (RR 2.98, 95% CI 2.33 to 3.79; 2 trials, 371 eyes; low-certainty evidence); along with the risk of elevated IOP (RR 3.64, 95% CI 2.71 to 4.87; 2 trials, 605 eyes; moderate-certainty evidence); and the need for medical (RR 3.04, 95% CI 2.36 to 3.91; 2 trials, 544 eyes; moderate-certainty evidence); or surgical interventions (RR 5.43, 95% CI 3.12 to 9.45; 2 trials, 599 eyes; moderate-certainty evidence). In either comparison, these implants did not increase the risk for endophthalmitis, retinal tear, or retinal detachment (moderate-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Our confidence is limited that local corticosteroid implants are superior to sham therapy or standard-of-care therapy in reducing the risk of uveitis recurrence. We demonstrated different effectiveness on BCVA relative to comparators in people with non-infectious uveitis. Nevertheless, the evidence suggests that these implants may increase the risk of cataract progression and IOP elevation, which will require interventions over time. To better understand the efficacy and safety profiles of corticosteroid implants, we need future trials that examine implants of different doses, used for different durations. The trials should measure core standard outcomes that are universally defined, and measured at comparable follow-up time points.

PRESUMED PANUVEITIS FOLLOWING COVID-19 VACCINATION IN A PATIENT WITH GRANULOMATOUS TATTOO INFLAMMATION.

PURPOSE: To report a case of panuveitis that developed following COVID-19 vaccination in a patient with a recent history of granulomatous tattoo inflammation. METHODS: Case report. RESULTS: A 25-year-old woman with a recent history of biopsy-proven granulomatous tattoo inflammation developed bilateral eye pain and blurred vision 1 week following her second mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccination (Moderna, Inc, Cambridge, MA). Examination revealed bilateral panuveitis. Workup for infectious etiologies and sarcoidosis was negative. The intraocular inflammation initially resolved with systemic prednisone therapy but then recurred following tapering, requiring the initiation of mycophenolate mofetil. CONCLUSION: A case of panuveitis that developed following a COVID-19 vaccination in a patient with a recent history of tattoo inflammation is reported. The temporal relationship between the vaccine and the development of uveitis in this patient may be coincidental and should be interpreted with caution, but multiple vaccines have been associated with uveitis, presumably as a result of their generalized stimulation of the immune system. It is believed that this case of tattoo-associated uveitis may have been exacerbated by the generalized inflammatory effect of COVID-19 vaccination.

Protothecosis in four dogs in New Zealand.

CASE HISTORIES: Medical records of four dogs diagnosed with protothecosis in New Zealand were reviewed. The dogs were aged between 4 and 9 years and three of the four dogs were female. Breeds were one Labrador, one Miniature Schnauzer and two crossbreeds. The reasons for initial veterinary evaluation were a cough and opaque appearance of the right eye (Case 1), diarrhoea (Cases 2 and 3), and cutaneous disease (Case 4). CLINICAL FINDINGS: The ocular signs were characterised by panuveitis, retinal detachment and secondary glaucoma. Gastrointestinal signs included chronic haemorrhagic diarrhoea due to colitis. Three cases had disseminated infection and developed both bilateral, blinding, ocular disease and chronic gastrointestinal disease. Cutaneous signs consisted of draining fistulae over the olecranon, multifocal cutaneous nodules, and ulceration and tracts of the foot pads. Disseminated protothecosis was confirmed by histopathology of biopsied ocular tissues in Cases 1 and 2 and by gastrointestinal biopsies in Case 3. Prototheca spp. were also identified in cytological specimens from Cases 1 and 4 and recovered by culture in Cases 2 and 4. Cutaneous protothecosis was diagnosed in Case 4 initially by cytology and histopathology of skin lesions, and Prototheca zopfii was confirmed by PCR of cultured organisms. TREATMENT AND OUTCOME: Prior to diagnosis of protothecosis, a variety of treatments were prescribed to treat the gastrointestinal and ocular signs. After diagnosis, only Cases 2 and 4 received medication aimed at treating the protothecal infection, which was itraconazole in both cases. Following the progression of clinical signs and concerns about quality of life, all four dogs were euthanised. DIAGNOSIS: Disseminated protothecosis in three dogs, cutaneous protothecosis in one dog. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Canine protothecosis is rarely reported, despite the ubiquity of the causal algae, and the disease usually carries an extremely grave prognosis when infection is generalised. In New Zealand, protothecosis should be considered as a differential diagnosis in dogs with panuveitis, chorioretinitis or retinal detachment, colitis, or nodular, ulcerative or fistulating cutaneous lesions.