Portability of IMRT QA between matched linear accelerators.

PURPOSE: To determine if patient-specific IMRT quality assurance can be measured on any matched treatment delivery system (TDS) for patient treatment delivery on another. METHODS: Three VMAT plans of varying complexity were created for each available energy for head and neck, SBRT lung, and right chestwall anatomical sites. Each plan was delivered on three matched Varian TrueBeam TDSs to the same Scandidos Delta4 Phantom+ diode array with only energy-specific device calibrations. Dose distributions were corrected for TDS output and then compared to TPS calculations using gamma analysis. Round-robin comparisons between measurements from each TDS were also performed using point-by-point dose difference, median dose difference, and the percent of point dose differences within 2% of the mean metrics. RESULTS: All plans had more than 95% of points passing a gamma analysis using 3%/3 mm criteria with global normalization and a 20% threshold when comparing measurements to calculations. The tightest gamma analysis criteria where a plan still passed > 95% were similar across delivery systems-within 0.5%/0.5 mm for all but three plan/energy combinations. Median dose deviations in measurement-to-measurement comparisons were within 0.7% and 1.0% for global and local normalization, respectively. More than 90% of the point differences were within 2%. CONCLUSION: A set of plans spanning available energies and complexity levels were delivered by three matched TDSs. Comparisons to calculations and between measurements showed dose distributions delivered by each TDS using the same DICOM RT-plan file meet tolerances much smaller than typical clinical IMRT QA criteria. This demonstrates each TDS is modeled to a similar accuracy by a common class (shared) beam model. Additionally, it demonstrates that dose distributions from one TDS show small differences in median dose to the others. This is an important validation component of the common beam model approach, allowing for operational improvements in the clinic.

Energy resolution improvement in simplified alpha spectroscopy for radionuclidic purity tests on 225Ac production floors.

This study investigated the feasibility of a simplified method of alpha spectroscopy for radionuclidic purity tests at 225Ac production sites that eliminates the need for a vacuum chamber. The impact of enhancing the energy resolution using a collimator was evaluated through radiation transport simulations. The results showed that a full width at tenth maximum (FWTM) of <300 keV was achieved for alpha particles from 241Am, for which the main energy peak was 5.5 MeV. Experimental validation using an electrodeposition source containing 237Np, 241Am, and 244Cm confirmed an FWTM of 272 keV for both 241Am and 244Cm. These two peaks, with a difference of ~300 keV, were effectively separated. In response to the growing demand for targeted radioisotope therapy, this simplified alpha spectroscopy method offers the potential to detect 226Ra mixed with 225Ac generated by accelerators, given the alpha energy difference of ~700 keV.

Validation of MLC leaf open time calculation methods for PSQA in adaptive radiotherapy with tomotherapy units.

BACKGROUND: Treatment delivery safety and accuracy are essential to control the disease and protect healthy tissues in radiation therapy. For usual treatment, a phantom-based patient specific quality assurance (PSQA) is performed to verify the delivery prior to the treatment. The emergence of adaptive radiation therapy (ART) adds new complexities to PSQA. In fact, organ at risks and target volume re-contouring as well as plan re-optimization and treatment delivery are performed with the patient immobilized on the treatment couch, making phantom-based pretreatment PSQA impractical. In this case, phantomless PSQA tools based on multileaf collimator (MLC) leaf open times (LOTs) verifications provide alternative approaches for the Radixact® treatment units. However, their validity is compromised by the lack of independent and reliable methods for calculating the LOT performed by the MLC during deliveries. PURPOSE: To provide independent and reliable methods of LOT calculation for the Radixact® treatment units. METHODS: Two methods for calculating the LOTs performed by the MLC during deliveries have been implemented. The first method uses the signal recorded by the build-in detector and the second method uses the signal recorded by optical sensors mounted on the MLC. To calibrate the methods to the ground truth, in-phantom ionization chamber LOT measurements have been conducted on a Radixact® treatment unit. The methods were validated by comparing LOT calculations with in-phantom ionization chamber LOT measurements performed on two Radixact® treatment units. RESULTS: The study shows a good agreement between the two LOT calculation methods and the in-phantom ionization chamber measurements. There are no notable differences between the two methods and the same results were observed on the different treatment units. CONCLUSIONS: The two implemented methods have the potential to be part of a PSQA solution for ART in tomotherapy.

Setup errors analysis in iterative kV CBCT: A clinical study of cervical cancer treated with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to analyze setup errors in pelvic Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) for patients with non-surgical primary cervical cancer, utilizing the onboard iterative kV cone beam CT (iCBCT) imaging system on the Varian Halcyon 2.0 ring gantry structure accelerator to enhance radiotherapy precision. METHOD: We selected 132 cervical cancer patients who underwent VMAT with daily iCBCT imaging guidance. Before each treatment session, a registration method based on the bony structure was employed to acquire iCBCT images with the corresponding planning CT images. Following verification and adjustment of image registration results along the three axes (but not rotational), setup errors in the lateral (X-axis), longitudinal (Y-axis), and vertical (Z-axis) directions were recorded for each patient. Subsequently, we analyzed 3642 iCBCT image setup errors. RESULTS: The mean setup errors for the X, Y, and Z axes were 4.50 ± 3.79 mm, 6.08 ± 6.30 mm, and 1.48 ± 2.23 mm, respectively. Before correction with iCBCT, setup margins based on the Van Herk formula for the X, Y, and Z axes were 6.28, 12.52, and 3.26 mm, respectively. In individuals aged 60 years and older, setup errors in the X and Y axes were significantly larger than those in the younger group (p < 0.05). Additionally, there is no significant linear correlation between setup errors and treatment fraction numbers. CONCLUSION: Data analysis underscores the importance of precise Y-axis setup for cervical cancer patients undergoing VMAT. Radiotherapy centers without daily iCBCT should appropriately extend the planning target volume (PTV) along the Y-axis for cervical cancer patients receiving pelvic VMAT. Elderly patients exhibit significantly larger setup errors compared to younger counterparts. In conclusion, iCBCT-guided radiotherapy is recommended for cervical cancer patients undergoing VMAT to improve setup precision.

Commissioning and validation of a single photon beam model in RayStation for multiple matched Elekta Linacs.

PURPOSE: A single treatment planning system (TPS) model for matched linacs provides flexible clinical workflows from patient treatment to intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) quality assurance (QA) measurement. Since general guidelines for building a single TPS model and its validation for matched linacs are not well established, we present our RayStation photon TPS modeling strategy for matched Elekta VersaHD linacs. METHOD: The four linacs installed from 2013 to 2020 were matched in terms of Percent Depth Dose (PDD), profile, output factor and wedge factors for 6-MV, 10-MV, 15-MV, and 6-MV-FFF, and maintained following TG-142 recommendations until RayStation commissioning. The RayStation single model was built to represent all four linacs within the tolerance limits recommended by MPPG-5.a. The comprehensive validation tests were performed for one linac following MPPG-5.a and TG-119 guidelines, and spot checks for the other three. Our TPS modeling/validation method was evaluated by re-analyzing the previous 103 patient-specific IMRT/volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) QA measurements with the calculated planar doses by the single model in comparison with the analysis results using four individual Pinnacle TPS models. RESULTS: For all energies, our single model PDDs were within 1% agreement of the four-linac commissioning measurements. The MPPG-5.a validation tests from 5.1 through 7.5 and all TG-119 measurements passed within the recommended tolerance limits. The IMRT QA results (mean ± standard deviation) for RayStation single model versus Pinnacle individual models were 98.9% ± 1.3% and 98.0% ± 1.4% for 6-MV, 99.9% ± 0.1% and 99.1% ± 1.9% for 10-MV, and 98.2% ± 1.3% and 97.9% ± 1.8% for 6-MV-FFF, respectively. CONCLUSION: We successfully built and validated a single photon beam model in RayStation for four Elekta Linacs. The proposed new validation methods were proven to be both efficient and effective.

Quality assurance for cancer patient safety: Clinical assessment for precise angles in linac during radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: Quality assurance for stereotactic body radiation treatment requires that isocentric verification be ensured during gantry rotation at various angles. This study examined statistical parameters on Winston-Lutz tests to distinguish the deviation of angles from isocenter during gantry rotation using machine learning. METHOD: The Varian TrueBeam linac was aligned with the marked lines on the Ruby phantom. Eight images were captured while the gantry was rotating at a 45° shift. The statistical features were derived from IsoCheck EPID software. The decision tree model was applied to these Winston-Lutz tests to cluster data into two groups: precise and error angles. RESULTS: At 90° and 270° angles, the gantry exhibits isocentric stability compared to other angles. In these angles, the most statistical features were inside the range. Most variations were observed at 0° and 180° angles. In most tests, the angles 45°, 135°, 225°, and 315° showed reasonable performance and with less variation. CONCLUSION: The comprehensive statistical analyses for gantry rotation of angles assists expert radiotherapists in determining the contribution of each feature that highly affects gantry movement at specific angles. Misalignment between radiation isocenter and imaging isocenter, tuning of the beam at each angle, or a slight change in the position of the Ruby phantom can further improve the inaccuracy that causes the most variations. Better precision can effectively increase patient safety and quality during cancer treatment.

Dose rate correction for the novel 2D diode array MapCHECK 3.

PURPOSE: To investigate the dose rate dependence of MapCHECK3 and its influence on measurement accuracy, as well as the effect of dose rate correction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The average and instantaneous dose rate dependence of MapCHECK2 and MapCHECK3 were studied. The accuracy of measurements was investigated where the dose rate differed significantly between dose calibration of the MapCHECK and the measurement. Measurements investigated include: the central axis dose for different fields at different depths, off-axis doses outside the field, and off-axis doses along the wedge direction. Measurements using an ion chamber were taken as the reference. Exponential functions were fit to account for average and instantaneous dose rate dependence for MapCHECK3 and used for dose rate correction. The effect of the dose rate correction was studied by comparing the differences between the measurements for MapCHECK (with and without the correction) and the reference. RESULTS: The maximum dose rate dependence of MapCHECK3 is greater than 2.5%. If the dose calibration factor derived from a 10 × 10 cm2 open field at 10 cm depth was used for measurements, the average differences in central diode dose were 0.8% ± 1.0% and 1.0% ± 0.8% for the studied field sizes and measurement depths, respectively. The introduction of wedge would not only induce -1.8% ± 1.3% difference in central diode dose, but also overestimate the effective wedge angle. After the instantaneous dose rate correction, above differences can be changed to 1.9% ± 8.1%, 0.2% ± 0.1%, and 0.0% ± 0.9%. The pass rate can be improved from 98.4% to 98.8%, 98.3%-100.0%, and 96.3%-100.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Compared with MapCHECK2 (SunPoint1 diodes), the more pronounced dose rate dependence of MapCHECK3 (SunPoint2 diodes) should be carefully considered. To ensure highly accurate measurement, it is suggested to perform the dose calibration at the same condition where measurement will be performed. Otherwise, the dose rate correction should be applied.

3D printed heterogeneous paediatric head and adult thorax phantoms for linear accelerator radiotherapy quality assurance: from fabrication to treatment delivery.

Objective. This study aims to design and fabricate a 3D printed heterogeneous paediatric head phantom and to customize a thorax phantom for radiotherapy dosimetry.Approach. This study designed, fabricated, and tested 3D printed radiotherapy phantoms that can simulate soft tissue, lung, brain, and bone. Various polymers were considered in designing the phantoms. Polylactic acid+, nylon, and plaster were used in simulating different tissue equivalence. Dimensional accuracy, and CT number were investigated. The phantoms were subjected to a complete radiotherapy clinical workflow. Several treatment plans were delivered in both the head and the thorax phantom from a simple single 6 MV beam, parallel opposed beams, and five-field intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) beams. Dose measurements using an ionization chamber and radiochromic films were compared with the calculated doses of the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS).Main results. The fabricated heterogeneous phantoms represent paediatric human head and adult thorax based on its radiation attenuation and anatomy. The measured CT number ranges are within -786.23 ± 10.55, 0.98 ± 3.86, 129.51 ± 12.83, and 651.14 ± 47.76 HU for lung, water/brain, soft tissue, and bone, respectively. It has a good radiological imaging visual similarity relative to a real human head and thorax depicting soft tissue, lung, bone, and brain. The accumulated dose readings for both conformal radiotherapy and IMRT match with the TPS calculated dose within ±2% and ±4% for head and thorax phantom, respectively. The mean pass rate for all the plans delivered are above 90% for gamma analysis criterion of 3%/3 mm.Significance and conclusion. The fabricated heterogeneous paediatric head and thorax phantoms are useful in Linac end-to-end radiotherapy quality assurance based on its CT image and measured radiation dose. The manufacturing and dosimetry workflow of this study can be utilized by other institutions for dosimetry and trainings.

Investigation of the beam quality and dose rate dependence of PAKAG polymer gel dosimeter in optical readout technique.

This study aims to evaluate the optical response dependence of the PAKAG polymer gel dosimeter on photon energy and dose rate. The produced gel dosimeters were irradiated using a Varian CL 21EX medical linear accelerator with delivered doses of 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 Gy. To examine the response dependence on the delivered dose rate, dose rates of 50, 100, 200, and 350 cGy min-1were investigated. Additionally, two incident beam qualities of 6 and 18 MV were examined to study the response dependence on the incident beam energy. The irradiated polymer gel dosimeters were readout using a UV-vis spectrophotometer in the 300 to 800 nm scan range. The results reveal that a wide variation in dose rate (50-350 cGy.min-1) influences the absorbance-dose response and the sensitivity of PAKAG gel. However, smaller variations did not show a significant effect on the response. Furthermore, the response changed insignificantly with beam quality for investigated energies. It was concluded that the optical reading response of the PAKAG polymer gel dosimeter is satisfactorily independent of external parameters, including dose rate and incident beam quality.

Quantification of Treatment Plan Deliverability in Breast Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy With Agility Multi-leaf Collimator.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim was to assess the complexity of breast volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans using various indices and to evaluate their performance through gamma analysis in predicting plan deliverability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 285 VMAT plans for 260 patients were created using the VersaHD™ linear accelerator with a Monaco treatment planning system. Corresponding verification plans were generated using the ArcCHECK® detector, and gamma analysis was conducted employing various criteria. Twenty-eight plan complexity metrics were computed, and Pearson's correlation coefficients were determined between the gamma passing rate (GPR) and these metrics. RESULTS: The average GPR values for all plans were 97.7%, 89.9%, and 78.0% for the 2 mm/2%, 1 mm/2%, and 1 mm/1% criteria, respectively. While most complexity metrics exhibited weak correlations with GPRs under the 2 mm/2% criterion, leaf sequence variability (LSV), plan-averaged beam area (PA), converted area metric (CAM), and edge area metric (EAM) demonstrated the most robust performance, with Pearson's correlation coefficients of 0.57, 0.50, -0.70, and -0.56, respectively. CONCLUSION: Metrics related to beam aperture size and irregularity, such as LSV, PA, CAM and EAM, proved to be reasonable predictors of plan deliverability in breast VMAT.

Off-iso Winston-Lutz test on seven linear accelerators.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to find optimal gantry, collimator, and couch angles for performing single isocenter, multiple target stereotactic radiosurgery (SIMT-SRS). Nineteen angle sets were tested across seven linear accelerators for radiation-isocenter coincidence and off-isocenter coincidence. The off-isocenter Winston-Lutz test was performed to evaluate the accuracy of isocenter alignment for each angle set, and optimal angle sets as well as maximum off-isocenter distance to target for each angle set was determined. The influence of simulated patient weight on off-iso Winston-Lutz test accuracy was also inspected. METHOD: The SNC MultiMet-WL phantom and MultiMet-WL QA Software v2.1 were used for the direct measurement and analysis of the off-iso Winston-Lutz test (also referred to as Winston-Lutz-Gao test). A two-step method was developed to ensure precise initial placement of the target. Nineteen beams were delivered at 6X energy and 2 × 2 cm field size to each of six targets on the MultiMet Cube with couch kicks at five cardinal angles (90°, 45°, 0°, 315°, and 270°). To reduce imaging uncertainty, only EPID was used in target alignment and test image acquisition. A total of 200 Ibs (90.7 kg) of weight was also used to mimic patient weight. All tests were performed on both the free table and the weighted table. RESULTS: For two new TrueBeam machines, the maximum offset was within the 1 mm tolerance when the off-iso distance is less than 7 cm. Two older VitalBeam machines exhibited unfavorable gantry, couch, and collimator (GCC) angle sets: Linac No. 3 at (0,90,0), (0,270,0) and Linac No. 4 at (0,45,45) and (0,90,0). The C-Series Linacs failed in the majority of GCC angle sets, with Linac No. 5 exhibiting a maximum offset of 1.53 mm. Four of seven machines show a clear trend that offset increases with off-isocenter distance. Additionally, the IGRT table was less susceptible to the addition of simulated patient weight than the ExactCouch. CONCLUSION: Among the seven linear accelerators addressed, newer model machines such as the Varian TrueBeam were more precise than older models, especially in comparison to the C-Series Linacs. The newer machines are more suitable for delivering SIMT-SRS procedures in all GCC angle sets, and the results indicate that newer TrueBeams are capable of performing SIMT-SRS procedures at all angle sets for targets of off-iso distances up to 7 cm. The trend that offset between the target center and radiation field center increases with off-iso distance, however, does not always hold true across machines. This may be comprised by the EPID's severe off-axis horn effect. Lastly, the IGRT couch was less susceptible to patient weight compared to ExactCouch in the off-isocenter Winston-Lutz test.

A novel EPID-based MLC QA method with log files achieving submillimeter accuracy.

The purpose of this study is to develop an electronic portal imaging device-based multi-leaf collimator calibration procedure using log files. Picket fence fields with 2-14 mm nominal strip widths were performed and normalized by open field. Normalized pixel intensity profiles along the direction of leaf motion for each leaf pair were taken. Three independent algorithms and an integration method derived from them were developed according to the valley value, valley area, full-width half-maximum (FWHM) of the profile, and the abutment width of the leaf pairs obtained from the log files. Three data processing schemes (Scheme A, Scheme B, and Scheme C) were performed based on different data processing methods. To test the usefulness and robustness of the algorithm, the known leaf position errors along the direction of perpendicular leaf motion via the treatment planning system were introduced in the picket fence field with nominal 5, 8, and 11 mm. Algorithm tests were performed every 2 weeks over 4 months. According to the log files, about 17.628% and 1.060% of the leaves had position errors beyond ± 0.1 and ± 0.2 mm, respectively. The absolute position errors of the algorithm tests for different data schemes were 0.062 ± 0.067 (Scheme A), 0.041 ± 0.045 (Scheme B), and 0.037 ± 0.043 (Scheme C). The absolute position errors of the algorithms developed by Scheme C were 0.054 ± 0.063 (valley depth method), 0.040 ± 0.038 (valley area method), 0.031 ± 0.031 (FWHM method), and 0.021 ± 0.024 (integrated method). For the efficiency and robustness test of the algorithm, the absolute position errors of the integration method of Scheme C were 0.020 ± 0.024 (5 mm), 0.024 ± 0.026 (8 mm), and 0.018 ± 0.024 (11 mm). Different data processing schemes could affect the accuracy of the developed algorithms. The integration method could integrate the benefits of each algorithm, which improved the level of robustness and accuracy of the algorithm. The integration method can perform multi-leaf collimator (MLC) quality assurance with an accuracy of 0.1 mm. This method is simple, effective, robust, quantitative, and can detect a wide range of MLC leaf position errors.

Characterization of a commercial plastic scintillator for electron FLASH dosimetry.

PURPOSE: This study investigated the potential of a commercially available plastic scintillator, the Exradin W2, as a real-time dosimeter for ultra-high-dose-rate (UHDR) electron beams. This work aimed to characterize this system's performance under UHDR conditions and addressed limitations inherent to other conventional dosimetry systems. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We assessed the W2's performance as a UHDR electron dosimeter using a 16 MeV UHDR electron beam from the FLASH research extension (FLEX) system. Additionally, the vendor provided a beta firmware upgrade to better handle the processing of the high signal generated in the UHDR environment. We evaluated the W2 regarding dose-per-pulse, pulse repetition rate, charge versus distance, and pulse linearity. Absorbed dose measurements were compared against those from a plane-parallel ionization chamber, optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters and radiochromic film. RESULTS: We observed that the 1 × 1 mm W2 scintillator with the MAX SD was more suitable for UHDR dosimetry compared to the 1 × 3 mm W2 scintillator, capable of matching film measurements within 2% accuracy for dose-per-pulse up to 3.6 Gy/pulse. The W2 accurately ascertained the inverse square relationship regarding charge versus virtual source distance with R2 of ∼1.00 for all channels. Pulse linearity was accurately measured with the W2, demonstrating a proportional response to the delivered pulse number. There was no discernible impact on the measured charge of the W2 when switching between the available repetition rates of the FLEX system (18-180 pulses/s), solidifying consistent beam output across pulse frequencies. CONCLUSIONS: This study tested a commercial plastic scintillator detector in a UHDR electron beam, paving the way for its potential use as a real-time, patient-specific dosimetry tool for future FLASH radiotherapy treatments. Further research is warranted to test and improve the signal processing of the W2 dosimetry system to accurately measure in UHDR environments using exceedingly high dose-per-pulse and pulse numbers.

Small field measurements using electronic portal imaging device.

Purpose/Objective. Small-field measurement poses challenges. Although many high-resolution detectors are commercially available, the EPID for small-field dosimetry remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of EPID for small-field measurements and to derive tailored correction factors for precise small-field dosimetry verification.Material/Methods. Six high-resolution radiation detectors, including W2 and W1 plastic scintillators, Edge-detector, microSilicon, microDiamond and EPID were utilized. The output factors, depth doses and profiles, were measured for various beam energies (6 MV-FF, 6 MV-FFF, 10 MV-FF, and 10 MV-FFF) and field sizes (10 × 10 cm2, 5 × 5 cm2, 4 × 4 cm2, 3 × 3 cm2, 2 × 2 cm2, 1 × 1 cm2, 0.5 × 0.5 cm2) using a Varian Truebeam linear accelerator. During measurements, acrylic plates of appropriate depth were placed on the EPID, while a 3D water tank was used with five-point detectors. EPID measured data were compared with W2 plastic scintillator and measurements from other high-resolution detectors. The analysis included percentage deviations in output factors, differences in percentage for PDD and for the profiles, FWHM, maximum difference in the flat region, penumbra, and 1D gamma were analyzed. The output factor and depth dose ratios were fitted using exponential functions and fractional polynomial fitting in STATA 16.2, with W2 scintillator as reference, and corresponding formulae were obtained. The established correction factors were validated using two Truebeam machines.Results. When comparing EPID and W2-PSD across all field-sizes and energies, the deviation for output factors ranged from 1% to 15%. Depth doses, the percentage difference beyond dmax ranged from 1% to 19%. For profiles, maximum of 4% was observed in the 100%-80% region. The correction factor formulae were validated with two independent EPIDs and closely matched within 3%.Conclusion. EPID can effectively serve as small-field dosimetry verification tool with appropriate correction factors.

Comparison Flattening Filter and Flattening Filter-Free Techniques in Small-Fields Dosimetry with Various Types of Detectors.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the detector size effect on small-field dosimetry and compare the performance of 6MV WFF/FFF techniques. METHODS: We investigated the detector size effect on small-field dosimetry and compared the performance of 6MV WFF/FFF techniques. PDD, profile curves, and absorbed dose were measured in water under reference conditions with 6MV (WFF/FFF) techniques. We employed Farmer FC65-P, CC13, CC01, and IBA Razor diode, with Versa Lineac. Subsequently, we replicated this assessment for small-fields under 5cmx5cm dimensions. RESULTS: For both 6MV WFF/FFF, significant dose differences (Dmax=1.47cm), were ±4.55%, ±6.7, ±12.75% and ±33.3% for 4cmx4cm, 3cmx3cm, 2cmx2cm, and 1cmx1cm, respectively. The average difference relative to D10 was observed to be ±4.66%, ±5.73%, ±6.58%, and ±8.75% for the previous field sizes. Differences between WFF/FFF are neglected values at all field sizes>2.3%, also, the output of the largest detector FC65-P is lower at 55% in the smallest field size. Variation in the profile doesn't exceed a difference of >5% in flatness between WFF/FFF at depth10cm, across all fields, while symmetry is >1%, but radiation output is considerably lower at 55% for FC65-P chamber in 2cmx2cm, 1cmx1cm compared to the CC01 chamber and Razor diode. Significant differences in 1cmx1cm, where FC65-P chamber exhibits around 49% difference compared to Razor diode with 6MV (WFF/FFF).  Conclusions: Significant differences were observed in doses with various detectors. Detector-size influences the dose. WFF/FFF techniques show no major differences in small-fields dosimetry. Utilize some situations the advantage of FFF boasting a higher dose rate, consequently reducing treatment time to half.

Accuracy of Beamscan Software in Determining the Inflection Point from the FFF Beam Profile Using Several Array Detectors.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study is to determine the accuracy of the PTW Beamscan program in determining the inflection point from Flattening Filter Free Beam Profile utilizing Multiple Detectors. METHODS: True Beam Linear Accelerator with 6FFF and 10FFF Photon Energies and 10 cm, 15 cm and 20 cm Field Sizes were used for this study. Profile measurements were taken with PTW's 729, 1,500, and 1,600 and the Starcheck system, the Pinpoint 3D with Beamscan system, and Linac's EPID. The first-order derivative was utilized in both the Excel spreadsheet and Beamscan software to analyse raw measured data to locate inflection point and the FWHM was calculated. The accuracy of inflection points and FWHM between the Excel sheet calculation and the software program were investigated. RESULTS: For 10X10 cm2 in the 729 Array, the greatest differences in FWHM were 5.16 mm and 5.04 mm for the X6 FFF and X10 FFF Energies, respectively. The largest difference was 2.26 mm for 1,600 SRS arrays with a 15×15 cm2 field size. The difference in FWHM between Manual and software analysis for 10X10 cm2 and 20X20 cm2 Field Sizes is in decreasing order for detectors from 729, 1,500, 1,600 SRS, Starcheck, Pinpoint 3D, and EPID. In contrast, there is no climbing or declining pattern detected in the difference in Field Width for the 15×15 cm2 Field Size. Similarly, for all detectors except the 1,600 SRS array, the peak of the first-order derivative occurs at the chamber position for a 15X15 cm2 field size. CONCLUSION: The higher resolution of measurement yields more accuracy in inflection point and the FWHM. Irrespective of measurement resolution, the Beamscan software provided the FWHM closer to the respective nominal Field Size. Out of all detectors, results obtained with Excel Starcheck and EPID are good in agreement with values obtained by the software analysis. Thus, it is shown that Beamscan software is so accurate in determining inflection point of a FFF beam profile and used for routine profile analysis.

CERN-based experiments and Monte-Carlo studies on focused dose delivery with very high energy electron (VHEE) beams for radiotherapy applications.

Very High Energy Electron (VHEE) beams are a promising alternative to conventional radiotherapy due to their highly penetrating nature and their applicability as a modality for FLASH (ultra-high dose-rate) radiotherapy. The dose distributions due to VHEE need to be optimised; one option is through the use of quadrupole magnets to focus the beam, reducing the dose to healthy tissue and allowing for targeted dose delivery at conventional or FLASH dose-rates. This paper presents an in depth exploration of the focusing achievable at the current CLEAR (CERN Linear Electron Accelerator for Research) facility, for beam energies >200 MeV. A shorter, more optimal quadrupole setup was also investigated using the TOPAS code in Monte Carlo simulations, with dimensions and beam parameters more appropriate to a clinical situation. This work provides insight into how a focused VHEE radiotherapy beam delivery system might be achieved.

Development of shielding evaluation and management program for O-ring type linear accelerators.

The shielding parameters can vary depending on the geometrical structure of the linear accelerators (LINAC), treatment techniques, and beam energies. Recently, the introduction of O-ring type linear accelerators is increasing. The objective of this study is to evaluate the shielding parameters of new type of linac using a dedicated program developed by us named ORSE (O-ring type Radiation therapy equipment Shielding Evaluation). The shielding evaluation was conducted for a total of four treatment rooms including Elekta Unity, Varian Halcyon, and Accuray Tomotherapy. The developed program possesses the capability to calculate transmitted dose, maximum treatable patient capacity, and shielding wall thickness based on patient data. The doses were measured for five days using glass dosimeters to compare with the results of program. The IMRT factors and use factors obtained from patient data showed differences of up to 65.0% and 33.8%, respectively, compared to safety management report. The shielding evaluation conducted in each treatment room showed that the transmitted dose at every location was below 1% of the dose limit. The results of program and measurements showed a maximum difference of 0.003 mSv/week in transmitted dose. The ORSE program allows for the shielding evaluation results to the clinical environment of each institution based on patient data.

Evaluating optimal quality assurance and quality control conditions of activation measurements at the accelerator-based boron neutron capture therapy system employing a lithium target.

Evaluating neutron output is important to ensure proper dose delivery for patients in boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT). It requires efficient quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) while maintaining measurement accuracy. This study investigated the optimal measurement conditions for QA/QC of activation measurements using a high-purity germanium (HP-Ge) detector in an accelerator-based boron neutron capture therapy (AB-BNCT) system employing a lithium target. The QA/QC uncertainty of the activation measurement was evaluated based on counts, reproducibility, and standard radiation source uncertainties. Measurements in a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) cylindrical phantom using aluminum-manganese (Al-Mn) foils and aluminum-gold (Al-Au) foils and measurements in a water phantom using gold wire with and without cadmium cover were performed to determine the optimal measurement conditions. The QA/QC uncertainties of the activation measurements were 4.5% for Au and 4.6% for Mn. The optimum irradiation proton charge and measurement time were determined to be 36 C and 900 s for measurements in a PMMA cylindrical phantom, 7.0 C and 900 s for gold wire measurements in a water phantom, and 54 C and 900 s at 0-2.2 cm depth and 3,600 s at deeper depths for gold wire measurements with cadmium cover. Our results serve as a reference for determining measurement conditions when performing QA/QC of activation measurements using HP-Ge detectors at an AB-BNCT employing a lithium target.

Simulating the head of a TrueBeam linear particle accelerator and calculating the photoneutron spectrum on the central axis of a 10-MV photon using particle and heavy-ion transport system code.

Photon energy is higher than the (γ,n) threshold, allowing it to interact with the nuclei of materials with high z properties and liberate fast neutrons. This represents a potentially harmful source of radiation for humans and the environment. This study validated the Monte Carlo simulation, using the particle and heavy-ion transport code system (PHITS) on a TrueBeam 10-MV linear particle accelerator's head shielding model and then used this PHITS code to simulate a photo-neutron spectrum for the transport of the beam. The results showed that, when comparing the simulated to measured PDD and crosslines, 100% of the γ-indexes were <1 (γ3%/3mm) for both simulations, for both phase-space data source and a mono energy source. Neutron spectra were recorded in all parts of the TrueBeam's head, as well as photon neutron spectra at three points on the beamline.