Conservative treatment in uterine perivascular epithelioid cell tumor of uncertain malignant potential: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Perivascular epithelioid cell tumors are uncommon mesenchymal tumors. The genital tract is the most common extrarenal location. Preoperative diagnosis is rarely achieved owing to non-specific symptoms and imaging features. Consensus on treatment strategies remains elusive. Case presentation We report the case a 38 year-old north African woman with a primary sterility, who was diagnosed with a uterine Perivascular epithelioid cell tumor of uncertain malignant potential on a resection specimen of an intracavity polypoid mass. Immunohistochemistry confirmed the diagnosis and we opted for conservative surgery to preserve the patient's fertility desires. CONCLUSION: Uterine perivascular epithelioid cell tumor is a rare entity that warrants consideration in the differential diagnosis of uterine tumors. Treatment modalities, follow-up protocols, and prognosis remain ambiguous. Given their unpredictable behavior, accurate diagnosis and long-term monitoring are imperative.

Malignant Perivascular epithelioid cell tumour of the uterus without TFE3 gene rearrangement: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Perivascular epithelioid cell tumours (PEComas) are soft tissue tumours. These neoplasms belong to the family of mesenchymal tumours, which include angiomyolipomas, clear-cell sugar tumours of the lung, and PEComas not otherwise specified (NOS). The probability of a perivascular epithelioid cell tumour (PEComa) occurring in the uterus is low, and the incidence, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of such tumours are still unclear. CASE PRESENTATION: A 51-year-old woman presented a 4-year history of natural menopause. An intrauterine mass was detected via ultrasound examination; the mass showed a tendency to increase but caused no symptoms. The levels of tumour markers were within the normal range. Pathological analysis of the curettage revealed perivascular epithelioid differentiation of the endometrial tumour. Consequently, a laparoscopic total hysterectomy with bilateral adnexectomy was performed. No distant metastasis was detected via whole-body positron emission computed tomography (PETCT) after the operation. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) revealed no TFE3 gene rearrangement. Next-generation sequencing of bone and soft tissue revealed negative TSC1/2 and TP53 expression. No recurrence or metastasis was observed during the 18-month follow-up period. CONCLUSION: PEComa of the gynecologic tract is a rare and challenging entity. Diffuse HMB-45 expression, TSC alterations and TFE3 rearrangement are characteristic of uterine PEComas. Surgical resection is the first choice. Genetic testing is helpful for determining the nature of the mass and for choosing targeted therapy. Further research is needed to establish treatment protocols.

TFE3-rearranged nonmelanotic renal PEComa: a case series expanding their phenotypic and fusion landscape.

AIMS: A subset of exceptionally rare primary renal perivascular epithelioid cell tumours (PEComas) that harbour Xp11.2 translocation have been reported, but no larger series devoted to this topic have been published. METHODS AND RESULTS: We describe the clinicopathological and molecular features of 10 renal PEComas, collected from our routine and consultation files. There were five female and five male patients aged 14-65 (median: 32 years). One patient had a history of childhood neuroblastoma, but no patients were known to have a tuberous sclerosis complex or other hereditary disorder. Complete surgical excision was the treatment for all patients. The available follow-up in five patients indicated a favourable outcome in 4/5 cases. Tumour size ranged from 2.8 to 15.2 cm (median, 5.2 cm). Immunohistochemistry revealed consistently strong TFE3 expression in all tumours, whereas PAX8 and keratin cocktails were uniformly negative. Other positive markers included HMB45 (7/9 tumours), CathepsinK (7/9 tumours), and CD117 (KIT) (3/5 tumours). TFE3 rearrangements were detected in 8/9 tumours (by targeted RNA sequencing in seven and by FISH in one). The identified fusion partners included SFPQ (n = 2) and one tumour each with ASPSCR1, ZC3H4, MED15, RBMX, and PRCC. One tumour that lacked TFE3 rearrangement by next-generation sequencing (NGS) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) revealed a large intrachromosomal deletion involving PKD1 and TSC2 by DNA-based NGS. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the morphologic and genetic diversity of TFE3-rearranged primary renal PEComas and underlines the value of surrogate TFE3 immunohistochemistry in identifying them. The lack of PAX8 and keratin expression represents the mainstay for distinguishing these tumours from MiTF-associated renal cell carcinomas. In addition, we report rare (ZC3H4, RBMX) and novel (MED15) TFE3 fusion partners in PEComa.

[TFE3-rearranged perivascular epithelioid cell tumors: a clinicopathological analysis of eight cases].

Objective: To investigate the clinicopathological, immunohistochemical and molecular genetic characteristics of TFE3-rearranged perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa). Methods: Eight cases of PEComa with TFE3 rearrangement diagnosed in the First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University from January 2014 to July 2022 were collected. Three were consultation cases and 5 were collected from our hospital; 7 cases were resection specimens and 1 case was a needle biopsy specimen. Routine histolopathological analysis, immunohistochemical staining, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and the next-generation sequencing were performed. Clinical data were collected and the prognosis was assessed. Results: The 8 patients consisted of 5 females and 3 males with a median age of 45 years (ranged from 25 to 65 years). The tumor location included 1 uterus, 1 liver, 1 urachus, 2 kidneys, 1 abdominal cavity, 1 colon, and 1 retroperitoneum (3 subsequent recurrences in the abdominal cavity, pelvis and ovary, and abdominal cavity, respectively). Morphologically, the tumor cells were uniform and epithelioid with translucent or eosinophilic cytoplasm. They were arranged in nests or sheets, most of which were separated by thin-walled blood vessels. There were no papillary structures, and no overt smooth muscle or fat components. Atypical features were seen in 3 cases, with bizarre nuclei and tumor giant cells. Large areas of necrosis were visible, and mitosis was common (up to 28/50 HPF). Melanin deposition was present in 3 cases. Immunohistochemical staining showed diffuse and strong positivity for TFE3 in 8/8 cases and for HMB45 in 6/8 cases; focal positivity for Cathepsin K and Melan-A in 6/8 cases and for SMA in 2/8 of cases. All cases were negative for CKpan, PAX8 and Desmin. TFE3 gene break-apart was detected by FISH in all 8 cases, 4 of which underwent next-generation sequencing, and it revealed that 2 cases presented with SFPQ::TFE3 fusion, 1 case with ASPSCR1::TFE3 fusion, and 1 case with no chimeric fusion. Seven cases were followed up for 4-94 months. All cases were alive; 4 cases were disease-free, 2 cases showed recurrence, and 1 case had metastasis at initial diagnosis. Conclusions: TFE3-rearranged PEComa has unique histomorphological, immunohistochemical and molecular characteristics. The biological behavior is aggressive, which could lead to recurrence and metastasis, and warrants close clinical follow-up.

Challenges in Diagnosing Metastatic Uterine PEComa: Insights from Two Case Studies.

BACKGROUND Perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) is usually a benign perivascular tumor that expresses both melanocytic and myogenic cell markers. We report 2 cases of advanced malignant uterine perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) in a 74-year-old woman and a 50-year-old woman undergoing surgery in our center. CASE REPORT Case 1: A 74-year-old woman presented with a painful and massive abdominal mass. The imaging revealed a 19-cm necrotic mass close to the mesentery, a suspicious lesion in the uterus, and a probable liver metastasis. The pathological diagnosis was quite difficult with mixed features of leiomyosarcoma and PEComa with an uncommon immunohistochemistry staining pattern. Therefore, we gave a diagnosis of sarcoma with PEComa-like features. Case 2: A 50-year-old woman with metrorrhagia and abdominal pain. Imaging revealed a 7-cm mass in the uterus and suspicious metastatic lesions in the lung and the liver. The immunohistochemistry pattern was typical, with a strong positivity of Human Melanoma Black-45 (HMB-45) and focal positivity of H-Caldesmon. The patient benefited from targeted adjuvant therapy (MTOR inhibitor-based), with 8-month a follow-up showing no recurrence for this Grade IV PEComa mutated for TP53, ATRX, and TSC1. CONCLUSIONS We have report 2 cases of metastatic PEComa with different clinicopathological features. An overlap remains between characteristics of PEComas and smooth-muscle tumors. At present, there are no known pathognomonic findings or specific diagnostic markers.

Unusual PEComa With PRCC :: TFE3 Fusion Mimicking Sinonasal Tract Melanoma.

BACKGROUND: We report a nasal cavity unusual perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) mimicking mucosal melanoma. METHODS: Immunohistochemistry was performed using BenchMark Ultra and panel of antibodies. The Ion Torrent platform and Ion AmpliSeq cancer hotspot panel were utilized for DNA genotyping. Target-specific RNA libraries for the detection of fusion transcripts were constructed using Archer Universal RNA Reagent Kit v2 and Archer FusionPlex Solid Tumor panel and sequenced on the MiSeqDx instrument. RESULTS: The tumor, diagnosed in 46-year-old female, was composed of spindle cells, and lacked pigmentation. Immunohistochemically, it showed a patchy HMB-45 positivity. Other melanocytic markers (S100 protein, Melan-A, SOX10) were negative. The tumor cells were weakly positive for KIT (CD117) while negative for smooth muscle actin, pancytokeratin cocktail (AE1/AE3), and synaptophysin. Diagnosis of primary sinonasal tract mucosal melanoma was favored. Additional molecular studies detected PRCC :: TFE3 fusion as the sole genetic change, and suggested the diagnosis of unusual PEComa. Previously, TFE3 fusions were reported in a subset of PEComas but not in melanomas, while PRCC involvement has only been documented once in an ocular PEComa. Immunohistochemistry revealed strong nuclear TFE3 expression concordant with the molecular findings. CONCLUSIONS: This report emphasis the importance of molecular testing in the differential diagnosis between PEComa and melanoma, especially when the tumor arises in a site typical of melanoma but showing an unusual morphology and immunophenotype. The detection of TFE3 fusion transcripts suggested the diagnosis of SNT PEComa, although it cannot be excluded that this and similar tumors represent a distinct diagnostic category.

An orbital perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) in a 9-year-old boy: Case report and review of the literature.

Perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComas) are a family of benign neoplasms characterized by smooth muscle and melanocytic differentiation. Orbital cases are rare. A 9-year-old male presented with a slowly growing orbital mass. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a well-defined orbital mass without intracranial extension. The microscopic appearance of the complete resection specimen showed large nests of epithelioid cells with wide cytoplasm containing melanin pigment and round to oval nuclei with mild cytonuclear atypia and low mitotic activity. Immunohistochemistry was positive for HMB45 and negative for melanA, smooth muscle actin, desmin and S-100 protein. Pangenomic RNA-sequencing identified an in-frame NONO-TFE3 rearrangement, and clustering data showed that the tumor's gene expression profile was grouped with other previously studied PEComas. A diagnosis of orbital pigmented PEComa with uncertain malignant potential associated with a NONO-TFE3 rearrangement was made. There was no recurrence after 1 year of follow-up.

Uterine perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComa) and the accuracy of proposed classification systems in predicting the malignant versus non-malignant behavior.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of available classification systems (Folpe, modified Folpe, Bennet, and Schoolmester) in predicting the behavior of uterine Perivascular Epithelioid Cell tumors (PEComas). METHODS: We reviewed the pathology registry to identify all uterine PEComas treated at our center. We conducted a systematic literature review searching electronic databases from inception to November 2023. We included all references reporting at least one case of uterine PEComa; cases associated with tuberous sclerosis complex were excluded. Patient-level data were extracted by identified records. Survival analysis was used to assess the accuracy of all proposed classification systems to classify uterine PEComas as malignant versus non-malignant. RESULTS: Six uterine PEComas were treated at our center. The literature search identified 101 uterine PEComas from 32 studies. Eighty-five out of 107 PEComas (28 studies and our series) reported enough follow-up data and details to apply all four classifications. The modified Folpe classification demonstrated the highest hazard ratio (HR) for relapse (HR:8.63; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.06-36.1) and death due to PEComa (HR:6.8, 95%CI:0.89-51.6) for malignant versus non-malignant PEComas. Changing the cut-off of PEComa size to ≥8 cm and mitotic figures per 50 high power fields to ≥5, the HR for recurrence lowered (HR:6.26; 95% CI 2.20-17.80), but HR for death increased (HR:10.3; 95% CI 1.35-77.80). CONCLUSIONS: The modified Folpe classification was the most accurate in predicting the PEComa behavior. Changing the cut-off of PEComa size and number of mitotic figures may improve the accuracy in predicting death due to disease.

Hepatic perivascular epithelioid cell tumors: Benign, malignant, and uncertain malignant potential.

In 2013, the World Health Organization defined perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) as "a mesenchymal tumor which shows a local association with vessel walls and usually expresses melanocyte and smooth muscle markers." This generic definition seems to better fit the PEComa family, which includes angiomyolipoma, clear cell sugar tumor of the lung, lymphangioleiomyomatosis, and a group of histologically and immunophenotypically similar tumors that include primary extrapulmonary sugar tumor and clear cell myomelanocytic tumor. Clear cell tumors with this immunophenotypic pattern have also had their malignant variants described. When localizing to the liver, preoperative radiological diagnosis has proven to be very difficult, and most patients have been diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma, focal nodular hyperplasia, hemangioma, or hepatic adenoma based on imaging findings. Examples of a malignant variant of the liver have been described. Finally, reports of malignant variants of these lesions have increased in recent years. Therefore, we support the use of the Folpe criteria, which in 2005 established the criteria for categorizing a PEComa as benign, malignant, or of uncertain malignant potential. Although they are not considered ideal, they currently seem to be the best approach and could be used for the categorization of liver tumors.

Hepatic perivascular epithelioid cell tumors: The importance of preoperative diagnosis.

Accurate preoperative diagnosis is highly important for the treatment of perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComas) because PEComas are mainly benign tumors and may not require surgical intervention. By analyzing the causes, properties and clinical manifestations of PEComas, we summarize the challenges and solutions in the diagnosis of PEComas.

A case of pancreatic PEComa with prominent inflammatory cell infiltration: the inflammatory subtype is a distinct histologic group of PEComa.

BACKGROUND: PEComa is a mesenchymal tumor that can occur in various organs including the uterus and soft tissues. PEComas are composed of perivascular epithelioid cells, and angiomyolipoma (AML), clear cell sugar tumor (CCST), and lymphangiomyomatosis (LAM) are considered lesions of the same lineage as tumors of the PEComa family. Histologically, a common PEComa shows solid or sheet-like proliferation of epithelioid cells. This is accompanied by an increase in the number of dilated blood vessels. Here, we report a case of pancreatic PEComa with marked inflammatory cell infiltration. CASE PRESENTATION: A 74-year-old male patient underwent an appendectomy for acute appendicitis. Postoperative computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a 30 × 25 mm non-contrast-enhanced circular lesion in the tail of the pancreas. The imaging findings were consistent with a malignant tumor, and distal pancreatectomy was performed. Histologically, most area of the lesion was infiltrated with inflammatory cells. A few epithelioid cells with large, round nuclei, distinct nucleoli, and eosinophilic granular cytoplasm were observed. Spindle-shaped tumor cells were observed. Delicate and dilated blood vessels were observed around the tumor cells. Immunohistochemically, the atypical cells were positive for αSMA, Melan A, HMB-45, and TFE3. The cytological characteristics of the tumor cells and the results of immunohistochemical staining led to a diagnosis of pancreatic PEComa. CONCLUSIONS: A histological variant known as the inflammatory subtype has been defined for hepatic AML. A small number of tumor cells present with marked inflammatory cell infiltration, accounting for more than half of the lesions, and an inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor-like appearance. To our knowledge, this is the first report of pancreatic PEComa with severe inflammation. PEComa is also a generic term for tumors derived from perivascular epithelioid cells, such as AML, CCST, and LAM. Thus, this case is considered an inflammatory subtype of PEComa. It has a distinctive morphology that is not typical of PEComa. This histological phenotype should be widely recognized.

A retrospective clinical analysis of 11 cases of PEComa from different sites.

PURPOSE: The objective of this paper is to offer a thorough examination of the clinical presentations, etiology, and treatment strategies associated with perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComas). METHODS: This retrospective study examined the comprehensive archival data of PEComa cases diagnosed at Beijing Hospital from 2015 to 2023. The pathology slides of all patients were thoroughly reassessed by two experienced pathologists. A thorough retrospective analysis was undertaken, incorporating clinicopathological data including gender, age at diagnosis, initial clinical manifestations, signs, disease onset site, tumor markers, imaging findings, therapeutic modalities, pathological features, immunohistochemical profiles, treatment responses, and prognostic indicators. Patients were evaluated for disease severity according to established pathological classification criteria and were followed up until the designated analysis cut-off date. In instances where patients were unable to be monitored on-site, they were contacted via telephone for postoperative follow-up inquiries. RESULTS: This study included 11 patients with ages ranging from 17 to 66 years old, presenting with the disease in multiple anatomical sites, including the retroperitoneum (2/11), liver (4/11), kidney (4/11), lung (1/11), and broad ligament of the uterus (1/11). Most patients presented with non-specific clinical symptoms and were subsequently diagnosed with space-occupying lesions upon physical examination. The tumor demonstrated progressive growth and enlargement, which could result in compression of neighboring organs. Preoperative imaging alone is insufficient for a definitive diagnosis of PEComa, but MRI can provide an initial evaluation of the tumor's potential malignancy. Molecular marker testing specific to PEComa, such as HMB-45 (90.0%), SMA (81.8%), Melan-A (90.9%), vimentin (90.9%), and Desmin (36.3%), was conducted on all patients. No adjuvant therapies were administered postoperatively. Upon analysis, no instances of relapse at the primary site or the development of new tumors at other sites were observed. Regular imaging reviews of three patients with malignant PEComa post-surgery showed no evidence of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical presentation, tumor biomarkers, and imaging characteristics of PEComa lack specificity, necessitating dependence on pathology and immunohistochemistry for precise diagnosis. The mainstay of treatment consists of surgical resection, with patients typically experiencing a favorable prognosis.

TFE3 -Rearranged PEComa/PEComa-like Neoplasms : Report of 25 New Cases Expanding the Clinicopathologic Spectrum and Highlighting its Association With Prior Exposure to Chemotherapy.

Since their original description as a distinctive neoplastic entity, ~50 TFE3 -rearranged perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComas) have been reported. We herein report 25 new TFE3 -rearranged PEComas and review the published literature to further investigate their clinicopathologic spectrum. Notably, 5 of the 25 cases were associated with a prior history of chemotherapy treatment for cancer. This is in keeping with prior reports, based mainly on small case series, with overall 11% of TFE3 -rearranged PEComas being diagnosed postchemotherapy. The median age of our cohort was 38 years. Most neoplasms demonstrated characteristic features such as nested architecture, epithelioid cytology, HMB45 positive, and muscle marker negative immunophenotype. SFPQ was the most common TFE3 fusion partner present in half of the cases, followed by ASPSCR1 and NONO genes. Four of 7 cases in our cohort with meaningful follow-up presented with or developed systemic metastasis, while over half of the reported cases either recurred locally, metastasized, or caused patient death. Follow-up for the remaining cases was limited (median 18.5 months), suggesting that the prognosis may be worse. Size, mitotic activity, and necrosis were correlated with aggressive behavior. There is little evidence that treatment with MTOR inhibitors, which are beneficial against TSC -mutated PEComas, is effective against TFE3 -rearranged PEComas: only one of 6 reported cases demonstrated disease stabilization. As co-expression of melanocytic and muscle markers, a hallmark of conventional TSC -mutated PEComa is uncommon in the spectrum of TFE3 -rearranged PEComa, an alternative terminology may be more appropriate, such as " TFE3 -rearranged PEComa-like neoplasms," highlighting their distinctive morphologic features and therapeutic implications.

Solitary Pulmonary Perivascular Epithelial Cell Tumor Mimicking Pulmonary Metastasis on 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in a Patient With Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor.

ABSTRACT: We report the findings of 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in a 56-year-old woman with solitary pulmonary perivascular epithelioid cell tumor. 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT showed a lesion with intense uptake in the region of pancreatic head and a solitary nodule with moderate uptake in the left lung. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor with pulmonary metastasis was considered. The postoperative pathological results showed a benign perivascular epithelioid cell tumor of the lung. This case emphasizes the need to increase awareness of benign perivascular epithelioid cell tumors in the differential diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodule with moderate DOTATATE activity.

Gynecologic perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComas): a review of recent evidence.

Gynecologic perivascular epithelioid cell (PEC) tumors, or 'PEComas,' represent a rare and intriguing subset of tumors within the female reproductive tract. This systematic literature review aims to provide an updated understanding of gynecologic PEComas based on available literature and data. Although PEComa is rare, there are varied tumor-site presentations across gynecologic organs, with uterine PEComas being the most prevalent. There is scarce high-quality literature regarding gynecologic PEComa, and studies on malignant PEComa underscore the challenges in diagnosis. Among the diverse mutations, mTOR alterations are the most prominent. Survival analysis reveals a high rate of local recurrence and metastatic disease, which commonly affects the lungs. Treatment strategies are limited, however mTOR inhibitors have pivotal role when indicated and chemotherapy may also be used. with some cases demonstrating promising responses. The paucity of data underscores the need for multicentric studies, an international registry for PEComas, and standardized reporting in case series to enhance clinical and pathological data.

Uterine Leiomyosarcoma Associated With Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Tumor: A Phenomenon of Differentiation/Dedifferentiation and Evidence Suggesting Cell-of-Origin.

Perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) is a mesenchymal tumor thought to originate from perivascular epithelioid cells (PECs). The normal counterpart to PEC, however, has not been identified in any human organ, and the debate as to whether PEComa is related to smooth muscle tumors has persisted for many years. The current series characterizes 4 cases of uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS) coexisting with PEComas. All cases exhibited an abrupt transition from the LMS to PEComa components. The LMS component displayed typical spindled morphology and fascicular growth pattern and was diffusely positive for desmin and smooth muscle myosin heavy chain, completely negative for HMB-45 and Melan A, and either negative or had focal/weak expression of cathepsin K and GPNMB. In contrast, the PEComa tumor cells in case 1 contained glycogen or lipid-distended cytoplasm with a foamy appearance (low grade), and in cases 2, 3, and 4, they displayed a similar morphology characterized by epithelioid cells with eosinophilic and granular cytoplasm and high-grade nuclear atypia. Different from the LMS component, the epithelioid PEComa cells in all cases were focally positive for HMB-45, and diffusely immunoreactive for cathepsin K and GPNMB. Melan A was focally positive in cases 1 and 3. Loss of fumarate hydratase expression (case 1) and RB1 expression (cases 2, 3, 4) was identified in both LMS and PEComa components, indicating that they are clonally related. In addition, both components showed an identical TP53 p.R196* somatic mutation and complete loss of p53 and ATRX expression in case 2 and complete loss of p53 expression in case 3. We hypothesize that LMSs containing smooth muscle progenitor cells may give rise to divergent, lineage-specific PEComatous lesions through differentiation or dedifferentiation. While we do not dispute the recognition of PEComas as a distinct entity, we advocate the hypothesis that modified smooth muscle cells represent the origin of a subset of PEComas, and our case series provides evidence to suggest this theory.