ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The 2016 IDSA guideline recommends a treatment duration of at least 7 days for hospital-acquired (HAP)/ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). The limited literature has demonstrated higher rates of recurrence for non-glucose fermenting gram-negative bacilli with short course therapy, raising the concern of optimal treatment duration for these pathogens. Therefore, we aimed to compare the outcomes for patients receiving shorter therapy treatment (≤ 8 days) versus longer regimen (> 8 days) for the treatment of multidrug resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas pneumonia. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate adult patients receiving an antimicrobial regimen with activity against MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa in respiratory culture between 2017 and 2020 for a minimum of 6 consecutive days. Exclusion criteria were inmates, those with polymicrobial pneumonia, community-acquired pneumonia, and infections requiring prolonged antibiotic therapy. RESULTS: Of 427 patients with MDR P. aeruginosa respiratory isolates, 85 patients were included. Baseline characteristics were similar among groups with a median age of 65.5 years and median APACHE 2 score of 20. Roughly 75% had ventilator-associated pneumonia. Compared to those who received ≤ 8 days of therapy, no difference was seen for clinical success in patients treated for more than 8 days (80% vs. 65.5%, p = 0.16). The number of 30-day and 90-day in-hospital mortality, 30-days relapse, and other secondary outcomes did not significantly differ among the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonging treatment duration beyond 8 days did not improve patient outcomes for MDR P. aeruginosa HAP/VAP.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Pseudomonas Infections , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Humans , Male , Female , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Retrospective Studies , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Aged , Middle Aged , Pseudomonas Infections/drug therapy , Pseudomonas Infections/microbiology , Pseudomonas Infections/mortality , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/microbiology , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/mortality , Treatment Outcome , Pneumonia, Bacterial/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Bacterial/microbiology , Pneumonia, Bacterial/mortality , Duration of TherapyABSTRACT
Ventilator-associated pneumonia is defined as pneumonia that develops in a patient who has been on mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours through an endotracheal tube. It is caused by biofilm formation on the indwelling tube, which introduces pathogenic microbes such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Candida albicans into the patient's lower airways. Currently, there is a lack of accurate in vitro models of ventilator-associated pneumonia development. This greatly limits our understanding of how the in-host environment alters pathogen physiology and the efficacy of ventilator-associated pneumonia prevention or treatment strategies. Here, we showcase a reproducible model that simulates the biofilm formation of these pathogens in a host-mimicking environment and demonstrate that the biofilm matrix produced differs from that observed in standard laboratory growth medium. In our model, pathogens are grown on endotracheal tube segments in the presence of a novel synthetic ventilated airway mucus medium that simulates the in-host environment. Matrix-degrading enzymes and cryo-scanning electron microscopy were employed to characterize the system in terms of biofilm matrix composition and structure, as compared to standard laboratory growth medium. As seen in patients, the biofilms of ventilator-associated pneumonia pathogens in our model either required very high concentrations of antimicrobials for eradication or could not be eradicated. However, combining matrix-degrading enzymes with antimicrobials greatly improved the biofilm eradication of all pathogens. Our in vitro endotracheal tube model informs on fundamental microbiology in the ventilator-associated pneumonia context and has broad applicability as a screening platform for antibiofilm measures including the use of matrix-degrading enzymes as antimicrobial adjuvants.
Subject(s)
Biofilms , Candida albicans , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Biofilms/drug effects , Biofilms/growth & development , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/microbiology , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/drug therapy , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/physiology , Humans , Candida albicans/drug effects , Candida albicans/physiology , Klebsiella pneumoniae/drug effects , Klebsiella pneumoniae/physiology , Klebsiella pneumoniae/growth & development , Intubation, Intratracheal , Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Prior antibiotic exposure has been identified as a risk factor for VAP occurrence, making it a growing concern among clinical practitioners. But there is a lack of systematic research on the types of antibiotics and the duration of exposure that influence VAP occurrence in children at current. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 278 children admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) and underwent invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) between January 2020 and December 2022. Of these, 171 patients with MV duration ≥ 48 h were included in the study, with 61 of them developing VAP (VAP group) and the remaining 110 as the non-VAP group. We analyzed the relationship between early antibiotic exposure and VAP occurrence. RESULTS: The incidence of VAP was 21.94% (61/278). The VAP group had significantly longer length of hospital stay (32.00 vs. 20.00 days, p<0.001), PICU stay(25.00 vs. 10.00 days, p<0.001), and duration of mechanical ventilation(16.00 vs. 6.00 days, p<0.001) compared to the non-VAP group. The mortality in the VAP group was significantly higher than that in the non-VAP group (36.07% vs. 21.82%, p = 0.044). The VAP group had a significantly higher rate of carbapenem exposure (65.57% vs. 41.82%, p = 0.003) and duration of usage (9.00 vs. 5.00 days, p = 0.004) than the non-VAP group. Vancomycin and/or linezolid exposure rates (57.38% vs. 40.00%, p = 0.029) and duration (8 vs. 4.5 days, p = 0.010) in the VAP group were significantly higher than that in the non-VAP group, either. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified the use of carbapenem (≥ 7 days) (OR = 5.156, 95% CI: 1.881-14.137, p = 0.001), repeated intubation (OR = 3.575, 95% CI: 1.449-8.823, p = 0.006), and tracheostomy (OR = 5.767, 95% CI:1.686-19.729, p = 0.005) as the independent risk factors for the occurrence of VAP, while early intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) was a protective factor against VAP (OR = 0.426, 95% CI: 0.185-0.98, p = 0.045). CONCLUSION: Prior carbapenem exposure (more than 7 days) was an independent risk factor for the occurrence of VAP. For critically ill children, reducing carbapenem use and duration as much as possible should be considered.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Carbapenems , Critical Illness , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Respiration, Artificial , Humans , Male , Female , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/microbiology , Retrospective Studies , Incidence , Child, Preschool , Carbapenems/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric/statistics & numerical data , Infant , Child , Risk Factors , Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects , Respiration, Artificial/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections are a major public health problem, requiring the use of last-resort antibiotics such as colistin. However, there is concern regarding the emergence of isolates resistant to this agent. The report describes two patients with urinary tract infection (UTI) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) infection caused by CRKP strains. The first case was a 23-year-old male with UTI caused by a strain of ST16 co-harboring blaCTX-M, blaTEM, blaSHV, blaNDM, blaOXA-48-like genes. The second case was a 39-year-old woman with VAP due to hypervirulent ST337-K2 co-harboring blaSHV, blaNDM, blaOXA-48-like, iucA, rmpA2 and rmpA. The patients' general condition improved after combination therapy with colistin (plus meropenem and rifampin, respectively) and both of them recovered and were discharged from the hospital. This study highlights the necessary prevention and control steps to prevent the further spread of CRKP strains should be a priority in our hospital.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Colistin , Klebsiella Infections , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Urinary Tract Infections , beta-Lactamases , Humans , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genetics , Klebsiella pneumoniae/drug effects , Klebsiella pneumoniae/isolation & purification , Klebsiella pneumoniae/enzymology , Klebsiella pneumoniae/pathogenicity , beta-Lactamases/genetics , beta-Lactamases/metabolism , Male , Adult , Klebsiella Infections/microbiology , Klebsiella Infections/drug therapy , Female , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Young Adult , Urinary Tract Infections/microbiology , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy , Colistin/therapeutic use , Colistin/pharmacology , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/microbiology , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/drug therapy , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Meropenem/therapeutic use , Meropenem/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/geneticsABSTRACT
Background and Objectives: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a common complication in critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation. The incidence rates of VAP vary, and it poses significant challenges due to microbial resistance and the potential for adverse outcomes. This study aims to explore the microbial profile of VAP and evaluate the utility of biomarkers and illness severity scores in predicting survival. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 130 patients diagnosed with VAP. Microbial analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, as well as measurements of C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) levels, were performed. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores were calculated to assess illness severity. Statistical analyses were conducted to determine correlations and associations. Results: The study revealed that Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) (50.7%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) (27.69%) were the most identified microorganisms in VAP cases. SOFA (p-value < 0.0001) and APACHE II (p-value < 0.0001) scores were effective in assessing the severity of illness and predicting mortality in VAP patients. Additionally, our investigation highlighted the prognostic potential of CRP levels (odds ratio [OR]: 0.980, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.968 to 0.992, p = 0.001). Elevated levels of CRP were associated with reduced survival probabilities in VAP patients. Conclusion: This study highlights the microbial profile of VAP and the importance of biomarkers and illness severity scores in predicting survival. Conclusions: The findings emphasize the need for appropriate management strategies to combat microbial resistance and improve outcomes in VAP patients.
Subject(s)
APACHE , Biomarkers , C-Reactive Protein , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Humans , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/microbiology , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Biomarkers/blood , Biomarkers/analysis , Aged , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Adult , Procalcitonin/blood , Procalcitonin/analysis , Organ Dysfunction Scores , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/isolation & purification , Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid/microbiology , Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid/chemistry , Cohort Studies , Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects , Severity of Illness IndexABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis is a common condition among invasively ventilated patients in intensive care units, for which the best treatment strategy is currently unknown. We designed the VATICAN (Ventilator-Associated Tracheobronchitis Initiative to Conduct Antibiotic Evaluation) trial to assess whether a watchful waiting antibiotic treatment strategy is noninferior to routine antibiotic treatment for ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis regarding days free of mechanical ventilation. METHODS: VATICAN is a randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter noninferiority trial. Patients with suspected ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis without evidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia or hemodynamic instability due to probable infection will be assigned to either a watchful waiting strategy, without antimicrobial administration for ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis and prescription of antimicrobials only in cases of ventilator-associated pneumonia, sepsis or septic shock, or another infectious diagnosis, or to a routine antimicrobial treatment strategy for seven days. The primary outcome will be mechanical ventilation-free days at 28 days, and a key secondary outcome will be ventilator-associated pneumonia-free survival. Through an intention-to-treat framework with a per-protocol sensitivity analysis, the primary outcome analysis will address noninferiority with a 20% margin, which translates to a 1.5 difference in ventilator-free days. Other analyses will follow a superiority analysis framework. CONCLUSION: The VATICAN trial will follow all national and international ethical standards. We aim to publish the trial in a high-visibility general journal and present it at critical care and infectious disease conferences for dissemination. These results will likely be immediately applicable to the bedside upon trial completion and will provide information with a low risk of bias for guideline development.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Bronchitis , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Respiration, Artificial , Tracheitis , Watchful Waiting , Humans , Bronchitis/drug therapy , Bronchitis/microbiology , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/microbiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects , Tracheitis/drug therapy , Intensive Care UnitsABSTRACT
Nosocomial pneumonia is defined as pneumonia occurring ≥â¯48â¯h after hospital admission in a patient without severe immunosuppression. It can occur in spontaneously breathing patients or with noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and mechanically ventilated patients. In patients with suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) (semi)quantitative cultures of tracheobronchial aspirates or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid should be perfomed. The initial empirical antimicrobial treatment is determined by the risk for multidrug-resistant pathogens (MDRP). The advantage of combination treatment increases with the prevalence of MDRPs. The antibiotic treatment should be adapted when the microbiological results are available. After 72â¯h a standardized re-evaluation including the response to treatment and also checking of the suspected diagnosis of pneumonia in a structured form is mandatory. Treatment failure can occur as a primary or secondary failure and in the case of primary progression necessitates another comprehensive diagnostic work-up before any further antibiotic treatment.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia/microbiology , Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia/diagnosis , Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/microbiology , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/drug therapy , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross Infection/diagnosis , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Drug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialABSTRACT
We compared clinical outcomes of patients who received monotherapy and combination therapy for treatment of MDR A. baumannii VAP. 170 patients were included. Vasopressor use and mortality rate were higher for combination therapy (69.3% versus 28.6%, p=0.024; 67.5% versus 14.3%, p=0.007; respectively). Majority received polymyxin B-based combination therapy, with higher mortality than those without polymyxin B (80.2% versus 19.8%, p=0.043). After adjusting for vasopressor use, monotherapy, dual combination, and triple combination therapy were not associated with mortality (aHR 0.24, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.79, p=0.169; aHR 1.26, 95% CI 0.79 to 2.00, p=0.367; aHR 0.93, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.49, p=0.744; respectively). There was no difference in adverse effects and length of stay between the two groups. Mortality from MDR A. baumannii VAP was high and not associated with monotherapy or combination therapy after adjustment for vasopressor use. Antibiotic regimens other than those containing polymyxin are urgently needed for the treatment of these infections.
Subject(s)
Acinetobacter Infections , Acinetobacter baumannii , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Drug Therapy, Combination , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Tertiary Care Centers , Humans , Acinetobacter baumannii/drug effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Male , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/microbiology , Middle Aged , Acinetobacter Infections/drug therapy , Acinetobacter Infections/mortality , Acinetobacter Infections/microbiology , Aged , Treatment Outcome , Adult , Polymyxin B/therapeutic use , Polymyxin B/administration & dosage , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Invasive device-associated nosocomial infections commonly occur in intensive care units (ICUs). These infections include intravascular catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), and catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI). This study aimed to evaluate the factors associated with invasive device-associated nosocomial infections based on the underlying diseases of the patients and antibiotic resistance profiles of the pathogens causing the infections detected in the ICU in our hospital over a five-year period. METHODOLOGY: Invasive device-associated infections (CRBSI, VAP, and CAUTI) were detected retrospectively by the laboratory- and clinic-based active surveillance system according to the criteria of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in patients hospitalized in the ICU of the tertiary hospital between 1 January 2018 and 30 June 2023. RESULTS: A total of 425 invasive device-associated nosocomial infections and 441 culture results were detected (179 CRBSI, 176 VAP, 70 CAUTI). Out of them, 57 (13.4%) patients had hematological malignancy, 145 (34.1%) had solid organ malignancy, and 223 (52.5%) had no histopathologic diagnosis of any malignancy. An increase in extended-spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) and carbapenem resistance in pathogens was detected during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic resistance of the Gram-negative bacteria associated with invasive device-associated infections increased during the study period. Antimicrobial stewardship will reduce rates of nosocomial infections, reduce mortality, and shorten hospital stay. Long-term catheterization and unnecessary antibiotic use should be avoided.
Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections , Cross Infection , Intensive Care Units , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Female , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Catheter-Related Infections/microbiology , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Aged , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/microbiology , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/epidemiology , Adult , Urinary Tract Infections/microbiology , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data , Aged, 80 and overABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Device-associated infections (DAIs) are a significant cause of morbidity following living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We aimed to assess the impact of bundled care on reducing rates of device-associated infections. METHODS: We performed a before-and-after comparative study at a liver transplantation facility over a three-year period, spanning from January 2016 to December 2018. The study included a total of 57 patients who underwent LDLT. We investigated the implementation of a care bundle, which consists of multiple evidence-based procedures that are consistently performed as a unified unit. We divided our study into three phases and implemented a bundled care approach in the second phase. Rates of pneumonia related to ventilators [VAP], bloodstream infections associated with central line [CLABSI], and urinary tract infections associated with catheters [CAUTI] were assessed throughout the study period. Bacterial identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing were performed using the automated Vitek-2 system. The comparison between different phases was assessed using the chi-square test or the Fisher exact test for qualitative values and the Kruskal-Wallis H test for quantitative values with non-normal distribution. RESULTS: In the baseline phase, the VAP rates were 73.5, the CAUTI rates were 47.2, and the CLABSI rates were 7.4 per one thousand device days (PDD). During the bundle care phase, the rates decreased to 33.3, 18.18, and 4.78. In the follow-up phase, the rates further decreased to 35.7%, 16.8%, and 2.7% PDD. The prevalence of Klebsiella pneumonia (37.5%) and Methicillin resistance Staph aureus (37.5%) in VAP were noted. The primary causative agent of CAUTI was Candida albicans, accounting for 33.3% of cases, whereas Coagulase-negative Staph was the predominant organism responsible for CLABSI, with a prevalence of 40%. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the effectiveness of utilizing the care bundle approach to reduce DAI in LDLT, especially in low socioeconomic countries with limited resources. By implementing a comprehensive set of evidence-based interventions, healthcare systems can effectively reduce the burden of DAI, enhance infection prevention strategies and improve patient outcomes in resource-constrained settings.
Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections , Liver Transplantation , Living Donors , Patient Care Bundles , Tertiary Care Centers , Humans , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data , Female , Male , Egypt/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Catheter-Related Infections/microbiology , Adult , Middle Aged , Patient Care Bundles/methods , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/microbiology , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology , Urinary Tract Infections/prevention & control , Urinary Tract Infections/microbiologyABSTRACT
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is one of the main causes of healthcare-associated infection in Europe that increases patient morbidity and mortality. Multi-resistant pathogens are a major public health issue in burn centers. Mortality increases when the initial antibiotic treatment is inappropriate, especially if the patient is infected with P. aeruginosa strains that are resistant to many antibiotics. Phage therapy is an emerging option to treat severe P. aeruginosa infections. It involves using natural viruses called bacteriophages, which have the ability to infect, replicate, and, theoretically, destroy the P. aeruginosa population in an infected patient. We report here the case of a severely burned patient who experienced relapsing ventilator-associated pneumonia associated with skin graft infection and bacteremia due to extensively drug-resistant P. aeruginosa. The patient was successfully treated with personalized nebulized and intravenous phage therapy in combination with immunostimulation (interferon-γ) and last-resort antimicrobial therapy (imipenem-relebactam).
Subject(s)
Bacteremia , Burns , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Phage Therapy , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Pseudomonas Infections , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Humans , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/virology , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/therapy , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/microbiology , Phage Therapy/methods , Pseudomonas Infections/therapy , Pseudomonas Infections/drug therapy , Burns/complications , Burns/therapy , Bacteremia/therapy , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Bacteremia/microbiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Male , Recurrence , Bacteriophages/physiologyABSTRACT
Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) affects up to 20% of critically ill patients and induces significant antibiotic prescription pressure, accounting for half of all antibiotic use in the ICU. VAP significantly increases hospital length of stay and healthcare costs yet is also associated with long-term morbidity and mortality. The diagnosis of VAP continues to present challenges and pitfalls for the currently available clinical, radiological and microbiological diagnostic armamentarium. Biomarkers and artificial intelligence offer an innovative potential direction for ongoing future research. In this Review, we summarise the pathobiological heterogeneity and diagnostic challenges associated with VAP.
Subject(s)
Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/microbiology , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Biomarkers , Intensive Care Units , Critical Illness , Length of StayABSTRACT
Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a common healthcare-acquired infection often arising during artificial ventilation using endotracheal intubation (ETT), which offers a platform for bacterial colonization and biofilm development. In particular, the effects of prolonged COVID-19 on the respiratory system. Herein, we developed an antimicrobial coating (FK-MEM@CMCO-CS) capable of visualizing pH changes based on bacterial infection and releasing meropenem (MEM) and FK13-a1 in a controlled manner. Using a simple dip-coating process with controlled loading, chitosan was cross-linked with sodium carboxymethyl cellulose oxidation (CMCO) and coated onto PVC-based ETT to form a hydrogel coating. Subsequently, the coated segments were immersed in an indicator solution containing bromothymol blue (BTB), MEM, and FK13-a1 to fabricate the FK-MEM@CMCO-CS coating. In vitro studies have shown that MEM and FK13-a1 can be released from coatings in a pH-responsive manner. Moreover, anti-biofilm and antibacterial adhesion results showed that FK-MEM@CMCO-CS coating significantly inhibited biofilm formation and prevented their colonization of the coating surface. In the VAP rat model, the coating inhibited bacterial growth, reduced lung inflammation, and had good biocompatibility. The coating can be applied to the entire ETT and has the potential for industrial production.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Biofilms , Hydrogels , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Animals , Hydrogels/chemistry , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/chemistry , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/microbiology , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/prevention & control , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Biofilms/drug effects , Biofilms/growth & development , Rats , Chitosan/chemistry , Chitosan/pharmacology , Male , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium/chemistry , Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium/pharmacology , Humans , Coated Materials, Biocompatible/pharmacology , Coated Materials, Biocompatible/chemistryABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Early antibiotic discontinuation in clinically suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) may lead to infection relapse/recurrence and increase mortality. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and potential predictors of treatment failure with this approach. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective observational study was conducted between September 2014 and November 2016 in a mixed intensive care unit. We included clinically suspected VAP patients whose quantitative sputum cultures from endotracheal aspirate were negative, allowing antibiotic discontinuation within 24 hours. Patients were monitored for signs and symptoms of recurrent VAP. Incidence and risk factors for treatment failure, defined as pneumonia recurrence, were determined using univariate logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: Forty-three patients met the inclusion criteria. The incidence of treatment failure among culture-negative VAP following early antibiotic discontinuation was 27.9% (12 patients). There were no significant differences in procalcitonin levels, leukocyte counts or body temperature between the two groups, except for the modified clinical pulmonary infection score (mCPIS) (5.42 ± 2.19 versus 3.9 ± 1.54, p = 0.014). Procalcitonin levels at VAP diagnosis and antibiotic cessation both showed low predictive capacity for treatment failure (AUC 0.56, CI 95% 0.36-0.76 and AUC 0.57, CI 95% 0.37-0.76, respectively). However, combining mCPIS with procalcitonin improved the predictive value for treatment failure (AUC 0.765, CI 95% 0.56-0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Early antibiotic discontinuation may lead to a high incidence of treatment failure among culture-negative VAP patients. Procalcitonin alone should not guide antibiotic discontinuation decisions while combining mCPIS and procalcitonin enhances predictive accuracy for treatment failure.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Treatment Failure , Humans , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/microbiology , Male , Retrospective Studies , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Intensive Care Units , Adult , Risk Factors , Incidence , ROC Curve , Withholding TreatmentABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Severe infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) have been reported increasingly over the past few years. Many in-vivo and in-vitro studies have suggested a possible role of intravenous fosfomycin for the treatment of CRAB infections. METHODS: This multi-centre, retrospective study included patients treated with intravenous fosfomycin for severe infections caused by CRAB admitted consecutively to four hospitals in Italy from December 2017 to December 2022. The primary goal of the study was to evaluate the risk factors associated with 30-day mortality in the study population. A propensity score matched analysis was added to the model. RESULTS: One hundred and two patients with severe infections caused by CRAB treated with an intravenous fosfomycin-containing regimen were enrolled in this study. Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) was diagnosed in 59% of patients, primary bacteraemia in 22% of patients, and central-venous-catheter-related infection in 16% of patients. All patients were treated with a regimen containing intravenous fosfomycin, mainly in combination with cefiderocol (n=54), colistin (n=48) or ampicillin/sulbactam (n=18). Forty-eight (47%) patients died within 30 days. Fifty-eight (57%) patients experienced clinical therapeutic failure. Cox regression analysis showed that diabetes, primary bacteraemia and a colistin-containing regimen were independently associated with 30-day mortality, whereas adequate source control of infection, early 24-h active in-vitro therapy, and a cefiderocol-containing regimen were associated with survival. A colistin-based regimen, A. baumannii colonization and primary bacteraemia were independently associated with clinical failure. Conversely, adequate source control of infection, a cefiderocol-containing regimen, and early 24-h active in-vitro therapy were associated with clinical success. CONCLUSIONS: Different antibiotic regimens containing fosfomycin in combination can be used for treatment of severe infections caused by CRAB.
Subject(s)
Acinetobacter Infections , Acinetobacter baumannii , Administration, Intravenous , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Carbapenems , Fosfomycin , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Sulbactam , Humans , Fosfomycin/therapeutic use , Fosfomycin/administration & dosage , Acinetobacter baumannii/drug effects , Acinetobacter Infections/drug therapy , Acinetobacter Infections/mortality , Acinetobacter Infections/microbiology , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Aged , Middle Aged , Carbapenems/therapeutic use , Sulbactam/therapeutic use , Sulbactam/administration & dosage , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/microbiology , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/mortality , Colistin/therapeutic use , Colistin/administration & dosage , Italy , Ampicillin/therapeutic use , Ampicillin/administration & dosage , Cefiderocol , Aged, 80 and over , Drug Therapy, Combination , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Bacteremia/microbiology , Bacteremia/mortality , Drug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialABSTRACT
Background: This study aimed to explore the risk factors for failed treatment of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii ventilator-associated pneumonia (CRAB-VAP) with tigecycline and to establish a predictive model to predict the incidence of failed treatment and the prognosis of CRAB-VAP. Methods: A total of 189 CRAB-VAP patients were included in the safety analysis set from two Grade 3 A national-level hospitals between 1 January 2022 and 31 December 2022. The risk factors for failed treatment with CRAB-VAP were identified using univariate analysis, multivariate logistic analysis, and an independent nomogram to show the results. Results: Of the 189 patients, 106 (56.1%) patients were in the successful treatment group, and 83 (43.9%) patients were in the failed treatment group. The multivariate logistic model analysis showed that age (OR = 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.07, p = 0.001), yes. of hypoproteinemia (OR = 2.43, 95% CI: 1.20, 4.90, p = 0.013), the daily dose of 200 mg (OR = 2.31, 95% CI: 1.07, 5.00, p = 0.034), yes. of medication within 14 days prior to surgical intervention (OR = 2.98, 95% CI: 1.19, 7.44, p = 0.019), and no. of microbial clearance (OR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.14, 0.70, p = 0.005) were risk factors for the failure of tigecycline treatment. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that the AUC area of the prediction model was 0.745 (0.675-0.815), and the decision curve analysis (DCA) showed that the model was effective in clinical practice. Conclusion: Age, hypoproteinemia, daily dose, medication within 14 days prior to surgical intervention, and microbial clearance are all significant risk factors for failed treatment with CRAB-VAP, with the nomogram model indicating that high age was the most important factor. Because the failure rate of CRAB-VAP treatment with tigecycline was high, this prediction model can help doctors correct or avoid risk factors during clinical treatment.
Subject(s)
Acinetobacter Infections , Acinetobacter baumannii , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Carbapenems , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Tigecycline , Treatment Failure , Humans , Acinetobacter baumannii/drug effects , Risk Factors , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Carbapenems/therapeutic use , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/microbiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Aged , Logistic Models , Acinetobacter Infections/drug therapy , Tigecycline/therapeutic use , Adult , Retrospective Studies , China , Drug Resistance, BacterialABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) is a diverse group of environmental bacteria associated with opportunistic infections. The identification of Bcc using conventional methods poses challenges. Bcc infections are difficult to treat due to intrinsic antibiotic resistance. The study aimed to investigate the species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of clinical Bcc isolates. METHODS: A total of 153 Bcc isolates obtained from clinical samples were analysed. Species identification was carried out using automated methods, including MALDI-TOF MS and VITEK2. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the disc diffusion method. RESULTS: Burkholderia cenocepacia (70.5%) emerged as the most prevalent species, followed by Burkholderia contaminans (9.8%) and Burkholderia cepacia (7.2%). Ventilator-associated pneumonia (38.6%) was the most common infection, followed by sepsis (28.1%). Co-existence of Bcc with other pathogens in many cases suggested potential co-infection scenarios. Antimicrobial susceptibility revealed that ceftazidime, co-trimoxazole and meropenem were the most effective drugs, while levofloxacin proved to be the least effective. Moderate susceptibility was noted to minocycline, with 4.6% of isolates exhibiting multi-drug resistance. CONCLUSION: This study provides valuable insights into the prevalence, clinical associations, and antibiotic susceptibility of Bcc in India. It highlights the importance of Bcc as a nosocomial pathogen, especially in vulnerable patient populations. The findings contribute to understanding Bcc infections, their distribution, and emphasize the necessity for accurate identification methods in clinical settings.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Burkholderia Infections , Burkholderia cepacia complex , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Tertiary Care Centers , Humans , India/epidemiology , Burkholderia Infections/microbiology , Burkholderia cepacia complex/drug effects , Burkholderia cepacia complex/isolation & purification , Burkholderia cepacia complex/classification , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Adolescent , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Infant , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/microbiology , Sepsis/microbiology , Aged, 80 and over , Coinfection/microbiology , Ceftazidime/pharmacologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has increased the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) among critically ill patients. However, a comparison of VAP incidence in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 cohorts, particularly in a context with a high prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms, is lacking. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a single-center, mixed prospective and retrospective cohort study comparing COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of the "Città della Salute e della Scienza" University Hospital in Turin, Italy, between March 2020 and December 2021 (COVID-19 group), with a historical cohort of ICU patients admitted between June 2016 and March 2018 (NON-COVID-19 group). The primary objective was to define the incidence of VAP in both cohorts. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the microbial cause, resistance patters, risk factors and impact on 28 days, ICU and in-hospital mortality, duration of ICU stay, and duration of hospitalization). RESULTS: We found a significantly higher incidence of VAP (51.9% - n = 125) among the 241 COVID-19 patients compared to that observed (31.2% - n = 78) among the 252 NON-COVID-19 patients. The median SOFA score was significantly lower in the COVID-19 group (9, Interquartile range, IQR: 7-11 vs. 10, IQR: 8-13, p < 0.001). The COVID-19 group had a higher prevalence of Gram-positive bacteria-related VAP (30% vs. 9%, p < 0.001), but no significant difference was observed in the prevalence of difficult-to-treat (DTR) or MDR bacteria. ICU and in-hospital mortality in the COVID-19 and NON-COVID-19 groups were 71% and 74%, vs. 33% and 43%, respectively. The presence of COVID-19 was significantly associated with an increased risk of 28-day all-cause hospital mortality (Hazard ratio, HR: 7.95, 95% Confidence Intervals, 95% CI: 3.10-20.36, p < 0.001). Tracheostomy and a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation were protective against 28-day mortality, while dialysis and a high SOFA score were associated with a higher risk of 28-day mortality. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 patients with VAP appear to have a significantly higher ICU and in-hospital mortality risk regardless of the presence of MDR and DTR pathogens. Tracheostomy and a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation appear to be associated with better outcomes.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Critical Illness/epidemiology , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/microbiology , Prospective Studies , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The emergence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli and the development of new antibiotics have complicated the selection of optimal regimens. International guidelines are valuable tools, but are limited by the scarcity of high-quality randomized trials in many situations. METHODS: A panel of experts from the French and Italian Societies of Infectious Diseases aimed to address unresolved issues in clinical practice based on their experience, an updated literature review and open discussions. RESULTS: The panel reached consensus for the following 'first choices': (i) cefepime for ventilator-acquired pneumonia due to AmpC ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales; (ii) the ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination most active in vitro, or cefiderocol combined with fosfomycin, and aerosolized colistin or aminoglycosides, for severe pneumonia due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant to ceftolozane-tazobactam; (iii) high-dose piperacillin-tazobactam (including loading dose and continuous infusion) for complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) caused by extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales with piperacillin-tazobactam minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≤8 mg/L; (iv) high-dose cefepime for cUTIs due to AmpC ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales other than Enterobacter spp. if cefepime MIC ≤2 mg/L; (v) ceftolozane-tazobactam or ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole for intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) due to third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales; (vi) ceftazidime-avibactam plus aztreonam plus metronidazole for IAIs due to metallo-ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales; (vii) ampicillin-sulbactam plus colistin for bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii; (viii) meropenem-vaborbactam for BSIs caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales; and (ix) ceftazidime-avibactam plus fosfomycin for neurological infections caused by carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa. CONCLUSIONS: These expert choices were based on the necessary balance between antimicrobial stewardship principles and the need to provide optimal treatment for individual patients in each situation.