ABSTRACT
â¢Although congenital syphilis has a known etiological agent, accessible diagnosis and low-cost, effective treatment with low fetal toxicity, it continues to challenge obstetric and antenatal care services. â¢The increasing rates of syphilis in the general population have direct repercussions on the increase in cases of congenital syphilis, a situation of objective interest for public health. â¢Although transforming the recording of syphilis and congenital syphilis into notifiable diseases improved the records and has made it possible to measure the occurrence of these diseases and create solutions, no effects on reducing their frequency have been reached yet. â¢The failure to control syphilis/congenital syphilis is multifactorial, and associates variables that range from the deficiency in teaching about these diseases in schools and in the training system of the various health professional segments, as well as the lack of rigid policies for quality control from antenatal care until the clinical follow-up of children exposed to Treponema pallidum during pregnancy. â¢To date, benzathine penicillin is the only antimicrobial accepted as effective by the main health authorities on the planet for the treatment of syphilis in pregnant women. â¢The fear of anaphylaxis in response to the treatment of syphilis with benzathine penicillin is an important factor hindering the prompt and correct treatment of pregnant women with syphilis, even though health authorities have made efforts to face the problem with solid arguments, still insufficient to resolve the question. â¢Although specific protocols are published, the failure to control the treatment of syphilis in pregnant women is still observed with high frequency, indicating and reinforcing a failure in the quality control of these care principles. The National Specialized Commission on Infectious Diseases of the Brazilian Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Associations (Febrasgo) endorses this document. Content production is based on scientific evidence on the proposed topic and the results presented contribute to clinical practice.
Subject(s)
Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Syphilis, Congenital , Syphilis , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/therapy , Prenatal Care , Syphilis/diagnosis , Syphilis/epidemiology , Syphilis/therapy , Syphilis/transmission , Syphilis, Congenital/diagnosis , Syphilis, Congenital/epidemiology , Syphilis, Congenital/therapy , Syphilis, Congenital/transmissionABSTRACT
Objective: To compare the effectiveness and safety of non-mRNA versus mRNA COVID-19 vaccines on pregnant women and their newborns in a systematic review with meta-analysis. Data sources: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central in May 2023. Study selection: The search strategy yielded 4451 results, 16 studies were fully reviewed. We selected case-control studies analysing non-mRNA versus mRNA vaccines. Data collection and analysis: we assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Standardised mean differences were pooled using random-effect models. Data synthesis: We identified 8 prospective and retrospective studies with a total of 32,153 patients. Non-mRNA vaccines were associated with a higher incidence of fever (OR 2.67; 95% CI 2.08-3.43; p<0.001), and a lower incidence of fetal or neonatal death (OR 0.16; 95% CI 0.08-0.33; p<0.001). In subgroup analyses, the Jansen vaccine (Ad26.COV2.S) was found to have a higher rate of premature labor/delivery (OR 4.48; 95% CI 1.45-13.83; p=0.009) and missed/spontaneous abortion (OR 1.90; 95% CI 1.09-3.30; p=0.02), as compared with the Pfizer (BNT162b2) vaccine. Conclusion: non-mRNA vaccines are associated with a lower incidence of fetal or neonatal death among pregnant women who receive a Covid19 vaccine, although at an increased rate of pyrexia compared with mRNA vaccines. Other studies are required for better assessment. PROSPERO: CRD42023421814.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , mRNA Vaccines , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , mRNA Vaccines/administration & dosage , mRNA Vaccines/adverse effects , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Pregnancy Outcome , SARS-CoV-2/immunologyABSTRACT
Objective: This systematic review accompanied by a meta-analysis aimed to estimate the prevalence of syphilis in pregnant women in Brazil and describe its associated factors. Methods: Following the establishment the search strategies and the registration of the review protocol in PROSPERO, we conducted a search for relevant articles in the Pubmed, LILACS, Science Direct, SciELO and Web of Science databases. Our inclusion criteria were cross-sectional studies published between 2005 and 2023, with no language restrictions. The combined prevalence of syphilis infection was estimated using the random effects model in the R Software with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) and p < 0.01 as statistically significant. Results: A total of 24 articles were recruited, which together investigated 221,884 women. The combined prevalence of syphilis in pregnant women in Brazil was 1.79% (95% CI: 1.24-2.57%), and the main factors associated with its occurrence were black and brown skin color, low education and factors related to the partner. Conclusion: There was a high prevalence of syphilis in pregnancy in Brazil, mainly associated with socioeconomic factors.
Subject(s)
Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Syphilis , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Brazil/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , Syphilis/epidemiologySubject(s)
Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections , Humans , Pregnancy , Female , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/prevention & control , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Aged , AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: In this study, we aimed to systematically review the literature of the prevalence of systemic antibacterial use during pregnancy and to perform a descriptive analysis focused on methodological characteristics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was registered in PROSPERO under protocol number CRD42022376634. Medline, Embase, Scientific Electronic Library Online, Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Web of Science databases were searched (published studies until November 3rd, 2022). Selected studies were population-based cross-sectional or cohort, carried out with pregnant women, and providing information about the prevalence of systemic antibacterial use at least in one trimester of pregnancy. Reviewers conducted in pairs the title and abstract screening, eligibility criteria check, and data extraction of selected studies. Quality appraisal was performed with an adapted version of the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Prevalence Studies. Data of included studies were pooled into a graphical and tabular summary. RESULTS: A total of 16,251,280 pregnant women and 5,169,959 pregnancy registers were identified. The prevalence estimates of systemic antibacterial use during pregnancy ranged from 2.0% (95%CI 2.0-2.0) to 64.3% (95%CI not reported) in the 79 included studies. The majority were performed in high-income countries (91.5%). Overall, the studies revealed considerable prevalence heterogeneity in terms of study type and dataset used. The 95% confidence intervals were not reported in 41% of studies. CONCLUSION: The disparities in the prevalence of systemic antibacterial use during pregnancy can be related to methodological issues and different health policies. Lack of uniform databases and changes in data collection methods over time should be taken into account in public health strategy planning. The scarce evidence in low- and middle-income settings hampers the comprehensiveness of the global prevalence of antibacterial use during pregnancy.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Humans , Pregnancy , Female , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Prevalence , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/drug therapyABSTRACT
This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the association between urinary tract infections (UTIs) during pregnancy and the risk of preterm birth (PTB). We searched multiple databases for relevant observational studies, categorizing them as UTI-based (comparing PTB incidence in women with and without UTIs) or PTB-based (comparing UTI prevalence in women with and without PTB). Using a random-effects model in Stata software version 17.0, we estimated pooled and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and performed subgroup, sensitivity, and cumulative analyses to explore heterogeneity. In total, 30 studies comprising 32 datasets were included, involving a total of 249,810 cases and 2,626,985 healthy controls. The meta-analysis revealed a significant positive association between UTIs during pregnancy and PTB occurrence (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.62-2.27). A sub-group analysis based on studies, the participants showed significant association in both PTB-based (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.58-2.56) and UTI-based studies (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.42-2.26). However, Egger's test indicated the presence of publication bias (p=0.020), and substantial heterogeneity was observed across the included studies (I2=96.6; p< 0.001). These findings emphasize the critical importance of early detection and effective management of UTIs in pregnant women to reduce the risk of PTB and its associated adverse outcomes. While the results highlight a robust link between UTIs during pregnancy and PTB risk, the potential influence of publication bias and substantial heterogeneity should be considered to interpret these findings. Further research is needed to better understand the underlying mechanisms and to develop targeted interventions for high-risk pregnant women.
Subject(s)
Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Premature Birth , Urinary Tract Infections , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Incidence , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Premature Birth/etiology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Urinary Tract Infections/complications , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Abortion is a public health problem in Latin America and is more common among women living with HIV. OBJECTIVE: to verify the incidence and factors associated with induced abortion in a cohort of women living with HIV assisted in a reference service for care for individuals with HIV/AIDS in Rio de Janeiro/Brazil. METHODS: Prospective cohort during the period 1996-2016. We estimated the incidence of induced abortions during follow-up in the cohort by calculating person-time incidence rates [per 100 persons-years (PY)] and investigated the factors associated with the outcome "induced abortion" using a generalized linear mixed model. RESULTS: 753 women and 210 pregnancies were included in the present analysis. We estimated an induced abortion incidence rate of 0.68/100 persons-years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.47; 0.94) in the study period, with a significant reduction after 2006. The main factors associated with an induced abortion were currently living with a partner (adjusted OR [AdjOR] 0.32 95% CI: 0.10-0.98), number of children (2 children AdjOR 0.12, 95% CI: 0.02-0.95) and the type of antiretroviral treatment used (regimen without Efavirenz: AdjOR: 0.11, 95% CI 0.02-0.70). CONCLUSIONS: We showed a significant reduction in the incidence of induced abortions in a cohort of women living with HIV in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, probably due to a decrease in the incidence of pregnancies observed in the same period. The factors associated with a lower occurrence of induced abortion suggest a good integration between the clinical and reproductive assistance offered to those women.
Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced , HIV Infections , Humans , Female , Brazil/epidemiology , Adult , Incidence , Abortion, Induced/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Prospective Studies , Young Adult , Risk Factors , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/virology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/drug therapy , Adolescent , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic useABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: to evaluate the factors associated with COVID-19 death in pregnant women hospitalized in Intensive Care Units in Brazil. METHODS: this ecological study was conducted using secondary data from Brazilian pregnant women with COVID-19 hospitalized in Intensive Care Units between March 2020 and March 2022. Univariate analysis and logistic regression were employed. RESULTS: out of 3,547 pregnant women with COVID-19 hospitalized in Intensive Care Units, 811 died (22.8%). It was found that lack of COVID-19 vaccination (OR: 2.73; 95% CI: 1.83; 4.04), dyspnea (OR: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.17; 2.56), obesity (OR: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.05; 2.17), chronic cardiovascular disease (OR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.14; 2.38), and non-white race/color (OR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.00; 1.66) were independently and significantly associated with death. CONCLUSIONS: it is concluded that vaccination status, presence of comorbidities, and clinical and ethnic-racial characteristics are associated with COVID-19 death in pregnant women hospitalized in Intensive Care Units in Brazil.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Intensive Care Units , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Humans , Female , COVID-19/mortality , Pregnancy , Brazil/epidemiology , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Adult , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/mortality , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Comorbidity , Pregnant WomenABSTRACT
The emergence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has led to the global COVID-19 pandemic, significantly impacting the health of pregnant women. Obstetric populations, already vulnerable, face increased morbidity and mortality related to COVID-19, aggravated by preexisting comorbidities. Recent studies have shed light on the potential correlation between COVID-19 and preeclampsia (PE), a leading cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity worldwide, emphasizing the significance of exploring the relationship between these two conditions. Here, we review the pathophysiological similarities that PE shares with COVID-19, with a particular focus on severe COVID-19 cases and in PE-like syndrome cases related with SARS-CoV-2 infection. We highlight cellular and molecular mechanistic inter-connectivity between these two conditions, for example, regulation of renin-angiotensin system, tight junction and barrier integrity, and the complement system. Finally, we discuss how COVID-19 pandemic dynamics, including the emergence of variants and vaccination efforts, has shaped the clinical scenario and influenced the severity and management of both COVID-19 and PE. Continued research on the mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy and the potential risk of developing PE from previous infections is warranted to delineate the complexities of COVID-19 and PE interactions and to improve clinical management of both conditions.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pre-Eclampsia , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/physiopathology , COVID-19/immunology , Pregnancy , Female , Pre-Eclampsia/physiopathology , Pre-Eclampsia/epidemiology , Pre-Eclampsia/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/immunology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/virology , Renin-Angiotensin SystemABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To analyze risk factors (maternal, obstetric and demographic) associated with congenital syphilis and the clinical characteristics of the newborns. METHOD: A cross-sectional study carried out in ten public maternity hospitals in Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil that included cases of live births reported with congenital syphilis in 2015. RESULTS: 469 cases were analyzed; 199 (42.4 %) showed some sign or symptom suggestive of congenital syphilis; of these, 65 (32.7 %) were preterm, 87 (43.7 %) had low birth weight, 116 (58.3 %) had jaundice that required phototherapy, 13 (6.5 %) had hepatomegaly, 10 (5 %) had skin lesions, eight (4.0 %) had splenomegaly and one (0.5 %) had limb pseudoparalysis. Records of other clinical changes were identified in 36 (7.7 %) children. Children whose mothers were not treated or who received a drug other than penicillin and those whose mothers had a VDRL titer ≥ 1:16 at birth were 3.7 and 3.2 times more likely to be born with signs of congenital syphilis (p < 0.001- 95 % CI 2.41-5.58; p < 0.001 - 95 % CI 2.41-5.58) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study draw attention to the importance of improving the quality of prenatal care and the development of studies aimed at finding alternative drugs for the treatment of syphilis in pregnant women and the prevention of congenital syphilis.
Subject(s)
Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Syphilis, Congenital , Humans , Syphilis, Congenital/diagnosis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Infant, Newborn , Female , Brazil/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Pregnancy , Male , Adult , Young Adult , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & controlABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The WHO presented the initiative: "Global elimination of congenital syphilis (CS): rationale and strategies for action". It establishes that CS is a preventable disease that can be eliminated. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the proportion of missed opportunities for prevention (MOP) of (CS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study. We studied women with children with confirmed diagnosis of CS (NOM-039-SSA2-2002) in the Mexican Social Security Institute in Jalisco from 01/01/2016 to 08/01/2022. The clinical records of the mother, the newborn and the epidemiological study (ES) were reviewed. Each case was classified into one of the MOP categories. RESULTS: 52 cases were reported: 46.2 % (n = 24) were ruled out, 34.6 % (n = 18) confirmed, 15.4 % (n = 8) unknown and 3.8 % (n = 2) probable cases. The HIV test was performed in 61.1 % (n = 11) and syphilis in 72.2 % (n = 13) of the mothers. The MOP in 27.8 % (n = 5) was inadequate treatment or omission of maternal treatment despite a timely diagnosis of syphilis. Treatment was inadequate in 63.6 % (n = 7) of the women who received it. CONCLUSION: The classification of MOP identifies gaps in CS prevention and can guide stakeholders, policy makers and public health prevention programs to reduce the incidence of CS.
ANTECEDENTES: La Organización Mundial de la Salud estableció que la sífilis congénita es una enfermedad prevenible que puede eliminarse. OBJETIVO: Estimar la proporción de oportunidades perdidas en la prevención (OPP) de la sífilis congénita. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio transversal descriptivo. Se eligieron mujeres en cuyos hijos recién nacidos se identificó sífilis congénita entre 2016 y 2022. Se revisaron los expedientes clínicos de la madre, el recién nacido y el estudio epidemiológico. Cada caso se clasificó en una de las categorías de las OPP. RESULTADOS: Se notificaron 52 casos: 46.2 % (n = 24) fue descartado, 34.6 % (n = 18) confirmado, 15.4 % (n = 8) desconocido y 3.8 % (n = 2) probable. Las pruebas para identificar infección por VIH y sífilis se realizaron en 61.1 % (n = 11) y 72.2 % de las madres (n = 13). La OPP en 27.8 % (n = 5) consistió en el tratamiento inadecuado u omisión de tratamiento materno a pesar de diagnóstico oportuno de la sífilis. De quienes recibieron tratamiento, en 63.6 % fue inadecuado (n = 7). CONCLUSIÓN: La clasificación de OPP de sífilis congénita permite identificar brechas en la prevención y dirigir intervenciones de salud pública hacia las principales causas para reducir la incidencia.
Subject(s)
Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Syphilis, Congenital , Humans , Syphilis, Congenital/prevention & control , Syphilis, Congenital/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Mexico/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Adult , Young Adult , Missed DiagnosisABSTRACT
Approximately 10-12 million new syphilis infections occur annually worldwide, including in pregnant women. This study identified the factors associated with syphilis in pregnant women admitted to a tertiary maternity ward in the State of Paraná, Brazil. This is an ambispective, paired case-control study (1:2 ratio) conducted from September 2020 to October 2021. Pregnant patients (n = 93) admitted to the maternity ward, who were tested with the Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) and rapid reagent test, were compared with 186 controls, matched by age and period of hospital admission. Sociodemographic, behavioral, prenatal, and maternity healthcare information was collected through interviews. The data were analyzed using binary logistic regression. Results showed that race/skin color other than white (OR: 2.12; 95%CI: 1.19-3.80; p < 0.001), having more than one sexual partner (OR: 3.69; 95%CI: 1.70-8.00; p = 0.001), being a former smoker (OR: 2.07; 95%CI: 1.07-4.01; p = 0.030) and a current smoker (OR: 4.31; 95%CI: 1.55-11.98; p = 0.005), as well as having a history of sexually transmitted infections (OR: 10.87; 95%CI: 4.04-29.27; p < 0.0.01) were risk factors for gestational syphilis. In summary, the study indicated that sociodemographic, behavioral, and healthcare-related variables were associated with gestational syphilis. Therefore, practitioners could benefit from incorporating these factors to deliver evidence-based treatment for gestational syphilis.
Subject(s)
Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Syphilis , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Brazil/epidemiology , Syphilis/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Adult , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/microbiology , Risk Factors , Young Adult , Tertiary Healthcare , AdolescentABSTRACT
AIMS: To evaluate the prevalence, molecular characteristics, antimicrobial susceptibility, and epithelial invasion of Streptococcus agalactiae strains isolated from pregnant women and newborns in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 67 S. agalactiae isolates, 48 isolates from pregnant women and 19 from neonates, were analyzed. Capsular type Ia and V were predominant (35.8%/each). The multilocus sequence typing analysis revealed the presence of 19 STs grouped into 6 clonal complexes with prevalence of CC17/40.3% and CC23/34.3%. The lmb and iag virulence genes were found in 100% of isolates. Four S. agalactiae strains, belonging to CC17/ST1249 and CC23/ST23, were able to adhere to A549 respiratory epithelial cells. Antimicrobial resistance was verified mainly to tetracycline (85%), erythromycin (70.8%), and clindamycin (58.3%). Four S. agalactiae isolates were multidrug resistant. The resistance genes tested were found in 92.5% of isolates for tetM, 58.2% for ermB, 28.4% for mefAE, and 10.4% for tetO. CONCLUSION: The study showed a high prevalence of virulence and antimicrobial genes in S. agalactiae strains isolated from pregnant women and newborns, supporting the idea that continued surveillance is necessary to identify risk factors and perform long-term follow-up in pregnant women and neonates in Rio de Janeiro.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Epithelial Cells , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Multilocus Sequence Typing , Streptococcal Infections , Streptococcus agalactiae , Streptococcus agalactiae/genetics , Streptococcus agalactiae/drug effects , Streptococcus agalactiae/isolation & purification , Female , Humans , Brazil , Pregnancy , Streptococcal Infections/microbiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Infant, Newborn , Epithelial Cells/microbiology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial/genetics , Adult , Virulence Factors/genetics , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/microbiology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/genetics , Virulence/geneticsABSTRACT
Motivation for the study. There is a gap in knowledge about vertical transmission of SARS- CoV-2 and its implications for maternal and neonatal health, despite evidence of multisystem involvement in pregnant women with COVID-19. Main findings. The study results suggest low incidence of vertical transmission during pregnancy, with only one PCR-positive case in the placenta and one asymptomatic neonate. Implications. Our results can inform strategies for prevention and management of COVID-19 in pregnant women, as well as guide the development of health policies aimed at protecting maternal and neonatal health during the pandemic. The aim of this study was to analyze the vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in pregnant women with COVID-19 in the Gynecology and Obstetrics Department of the Edgardo Rebagliati Martins National Hospital (HNERM). Twelve pregnant women who met the inclusion criteria were included. Real-time PCR (RT-PCR) tests for SARS-CoV-2 were performed when each woman was admitted to the hospital, placenta samples were collected for pathological evaluation as well. The results showed that vertical transmission of the virus was rare, with an overall low positivity rate in newborns. Although the study has limitations, such as the small number of cases and the lack of electron microscope analysis, it is the first attempt to evaluate vertical transmission in Peru. It is concluded that more research is needed to better understand the relationship between COVID-19 infection and complications during pregnancy.
Se realizó un estudio en el departamento de Ginecología y Obstetricia del Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins (HNERM) con el objetivo analizar la transmisión vertical del SARS-CoV-2 en mujeres embarazadas con COVID-19. Se incluyeron 12 gestantes que cumplían con los criterios de inclusión. Se realizaron pruebas diagnósticas de PCR en tiempo real (RT-PCR) para SARS-CoV-2 durante la admisión de cada gestante y se recolectaron muestras de placenta para su evaluación anatomopatológica. Los resultados mostraron que la transmisión vertical del virus fue poco común, con una tasa general de positividad baja en los recién nacidos. Aunque el estudio presenta limitaciones, como el número reducido de casos y la falta de análisis con microscopio electrónico, constituye el primer intento en Perú de evaluar la transmisión vertical. Se concluye que se necesita más investigación para comprender mejor la relación entre la infección por la COVID-19 y las complicaciones durante el embarazo. Motivación para realizar el estudio. A pesar de la evidencia de una afectación multisistémica en mujeres embarazadas con la COVID-19, existe un vacío de conocimiento sobre la transmisión vertical del virus y sus implicancias en la salud materna y neonatal. Principales hallazgos. Los resultados del estudio sugieren una baja incidencia de transmisión vertical durante el embarazo, con solo un caso positivo de PCR en la placenta y un neonato asintomático. Implicancias. Este resultado pueden informar las estrategias de prevención y manejo de la COVID-19 en mujeres embarazadas, así como guiar el desarrollo de políticas sanitarias dirigidas a proteger la salud materna y neonatal durante la pandemia.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Humans , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/diagnosis , Female , Pregnancy , Peru/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/virology , Adult , Infant, Newborn , Young Adult , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid TestingABSTRACT
Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a complex condition with unclear origins, involving genetic susceptibility and environmental triggers that lead to immune system dysfunction. We report a case of a pregnant woman from a mosquito-borne disease-endemic area who presented jaundice, abdominal pain, and pruritus, complicated by acute liver failure. Immunological markers showed AIH triggered by dengue virus infection, which was confirmed by a positive IgM test. Treatment with supportive care followed by steroids and azathioprine resulted in favorable outcomes, averting the need for a liver transplant. Although AIH can be triggered by viruses, the role of dengue in its pathogenesis remains poorly understood. Regular clinical monitoring is vital for managing AIH, particularly during pregnancy, due to variable immune status and treatment responses. Further research is necessary to understand the link between dengue infection and AIH. Individualized treatment strategies are crucial, especially during pregnancy, in order to ensure favorable outcomes.
La hepatitis autoinmune (HAI) es una condición compleja con etiología poco clara, que engloba componentes genéticos y ambientales que pueden desencadenar disfunción del sistema inmunológico. Presentamos el caso de una gestante de una zona endémica de dengue que se presentó con ictericia, dolor abdominal y prurito, complicándose con insuficiencia hepática aguda. Los marcadores inmunológicos indicaron HAI desencadenada por la infección del virus del dengue, confirmada por una prueba positiva de IgM. El tratamiento con cuidados de soporte seguido de corticoterapia y azatioprina tuvo resultados clínicos y laboratoriales favorables, evitando la necesidad de un trasplante de hígado. Diversos virus han sido descritos como desencadenantes de HAI; sin embargo, el papel del virus del dengue en su patogénesis sigue siendo desconocido. El monitoreo clínico regular es vital para el manejo de la HAI, especialmente durante el embarazo, debido a las alteraciones inmunológicas y las diversas respuestas al tratamiento. Se necesita más investigación para dilucidar el vínculo entre la infección por dengue y el desarrollo de HAI. El tratamiento individualizado en estos pacientes es crucial, especialmente durante el embarazo, para disminuir el riesgo de complicaciones.
Subject(s)
Dengue , Hepatitis, Autoimmune , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Hepatitis, Autoimmune/etiology , Dengue/complications , Adult , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Liver Failure/etiologyABSTRACT
Zika virus (ZIKV) infection was first reported in 2015 in Brazil as causing microcephaly and other developmental abnormalities in newborns, leading to the identification of Congenital Zika Syndrome (CZS). Viral infections have been considered an environmental risk factor for neurodevelopmental disorders outcome, such as Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Moreover, not only the infection per se, but maternal immune system activation during pregnancy, has been linked to fetal neurodevelopmental disorders. To understand the impact of ZIKV vertical infection on brain development, we derived induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) from Brazilian children born with CZS, some of the patients also being diagnosed with ASD. Comparing iPSC-derived neurons from CZS with a control group, we found lower levels of pre- and postsynaptic proteins and reduced functional synapses by puncta co-localization. Furthermore, neurons and astrocytes derived from the CZS group showed decreased glutamate levels. Additionally, the CZS group exhibited elevated levels of cytokine production, one of which being IL-6, already associated with the ASD phenotype. These preliminary findings suggest that ZIKV vertical infection may cause long-lasting disruptions in brain development during fetal stages, even in the absence of the virus after birth. These disruptions could contribute to neurodevelopmental disorders manifestations such as ASD. Our study contributes with novel knowledge of the CZS outcomes and paves the way for clinical validation and the development of potential interventions to mitigate the impact of ZIKV vertical infection on neurodevelopment.
Subject(s)
Brain , Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical , Synapses , Zika Virus Infection , Zika Virus , Humans , Zika Virus Infection/virology , Zika Virus Infection/pathology , Female , Zika Virus/pathogenicity , Synapses/pathology , Synapses/metabolism , Brain/virology , Brain/pathology , Pregnancy , Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells/metabolism , Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells/virology , Neurons/virology , Neurons/metabolism , Neurons/pathology , Male , Astrocytes/virology , Astrocytes/metabolism , Neuroinflammatory Diseases/virology , Neuroinflammatory Diseases/pathology , Neuroinflammatory Diseases/metabolism , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/virology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/pathology , Brazil , Infant, Newborn , Autism Spectrum Disorder/virology , ChildABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess the impact of the Gamma coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) variant on pregnant and postpartum women with Cardiovascular Disease (CVD). METHODS: The Influenza Epidemiological Surveillance System database (SIVEP-Gripe), a compulsory notification system for cases of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), was investigated for notified cases of pregnant and postpartum women with reported CVD and SARS due to COVID-19 between February 16, 2020 and May 1, 2021 (when vaccination began), was investigated. In this retrospective cohort, two groups were formed based on symptom onset date, according to the predominance of the variants: original (group 2020) and Gamma (group 2021). Cases with missing information on the presence or absence of CVD were excluded. The comparative analysis was controlled for confounding variables. RESULTS: Among 703 COVID-19 cases notified with CVD (406 patients in 2020 and 297 patients in 2021), compared to 2020, cases in 2021 had more respiratory symptoms (90.6 % vs. 80.1 %, p < 0.001), greater ventilatory support need (75.3 % vs. 53.9 %, p < 0.001), more ICU admission (46.6 % vs. 34.3 %, p = 0.002), longer duration (20.59 ± 14.47 vs. 16.52 ± 12.98 days, p < 0.001), higher mortality (25.6 % vs. 15.5 %, p < 0.001), with more than two-times mortality likelihood in the third trimester (adjusted OR = 2.41, 95 % CI 1.50-3.88, p < 0.001) or puerperium periods (adjusted_OR = 2.15, 95 % CI 1.34-3.44, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In Brazil, pregnant and postpartum women with CVDs in the Gamma variant phase have higher morbidity and mortality than those affected by the original variant of Coronavirus-19.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiovascular Diseases , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/epidemiology , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Brazil/epidemiology , Prognosis , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/virology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Postpartum Period , Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Current protocols aim to prevent some infant GBS infection through screening and peripartum antibiotics, however such strategies cannot be widely implemented in resource-limited settings. On the other hand, maternal vaccines in development against Group B Streptococcus (GBS) can provide a feasible universal approach. The success of any vaccine will depend on uptake in the population. Rates of maternal GBS colonization in the Dominican Republic (DR) and Caribbean region are among the highest in the world, but little is known about attitudes towards maternal vaccines in this region. METHODS: A cross-sectional, multicenter, mixed-methodology survey evaluated facilitators and barriers to maternal immunization and acceptability of a hypothetical Group B Streptococcus vaccine among pregnant women in three hospitals in the DR. RESULTS: Six-hundred and fifty women completed the survey of whom 85 % had never heard of GBS. Following receipt of information about GBS and a vaccine, 94 % of women stated that they would be likely or very likely to receive a vaccine. Being 18 years or younger was associated with a lower likelihood of GBS vaccine receipt (AOR 0.32, 95 % CI 0.14-0.69). Being born in the DR was associated with a higher likelihood of GBS vaccine receipt (AOR 2.73, 95 % CI 1.25-5.97). Among women who were unlikely to receive the vaccine, uncertainty about potential harm from a novel vaccine was the prominent theme elicited from free text responses. CONCLUSION: There was a high level of acceptance of a future GBS vaccine among this sample of pregnant women in the DR. However, knowledge of vaccines and vaccine-preventable diseases was low, and most women had concerns about the safety of new vaccines. Interventions that strengthen existing maternal immunisation infrastructures, including increasing education of pregnant women about vaccines, will aid the successful implementation of a future GBS vaccine.
Subject(s)
Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Pregnant Women , Streptococcal Infections , Streptococcal Vaccines , Streptococcus agalactiae , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Dominican Republic , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Streptococcal Infections/prevention & control , Streptococcal Vaccines/immunology , Streptococcal Vaccines/administration & dosage , Streptococcus agalactiae/immunology , Young Adult , Pregnant Women/psychology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Adolescent , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vaccination/psychology , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pregnant persons are susceptible to significant complications following COVID-19, even death. However, worldwide COVID-19 vaccination coverage during pregnancy remains suboptimal. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines administered to pregnant persons and shared this evidence via an interactive online website. METHODS: We followed Cochrane methods to conduct this living systematic review. We included studies assessing the effects of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant persons. We conducted searches every other week for studies until October 2023, without restrictions on language or publication status, in ten databases, guidelines, preprint servers, and COVID-19 websites. The reference lists of eligible studies were hand searched to identify additional relevant studies. Pairs of review authors independently selected eligible studies using the web-based software COVIDENCE. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed independently by pairs of authors. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. We performed random-effects meta-analyses of adjusted relative effects for relevant confounders of comparative studies and proportional meta-analyses to summarize frequencies from one-sample studies using R statistical software. We present the GRADE certainty of evidence from comparative studies. Findings are available on an interactive living systematic review webpage, including an updated evidence map and real-time meta-analyses customizable by subgroups and filters. RESULTS: We included 177 studies involving 638,791 participants from 41 countries. Among the 11 types of COVID-19 vaccines identified, the most frequently used platforms were mRNA (154 studies), viral vector (51), and inactivated virus vaccines (17). Low to very low-certainty evidence suggests that vaccination may result in minimal to no important differences compared to no vaccination in all assessed maternal and infant safety outcomes from 26 fewer to 17 more events per 1000 pregnant persons, and 13 fewer to 9 more events per 1000 neonates, respectively. We found statistically significant reductions in emergency cesarean deliveries (9%) with mRNA vaccines, and in stillbirth (75-83%) with mRNA/viral vector vaccines. Low to very low-certainty evidence suggests that vaccination during pregnancy with mRNA vaccines may reduce severe cases or hospitalizations in pregnant persons with COVID-19 (72%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 42-86), symptomatic COVID-19 (78%; 95% CI 21-94), and virologically confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (82%; 95% CI 39-95). Reductions were lower with other vaccine types and during Omicron variant dominance than Alpha and Delta dominance. Infants also presented with fewer severe cases or hospitalizations due to COVID-19 and laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (64%; 95% CI 37-80 and 66%; 95% CI 37-81, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We found a large body of evidence supporting the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy. While the certainty of evidence is not high, it stands as the most reliable option available, given the current absence of pregnant individuals in clinical trials. Results are shared in near real time in an accessible and interactive format for scientists, decision makers, clinicians, and the general public. This living systematic review highlights the relevance of continuous vaccine safety and effectiveness monitoring, particularly in at-risk populations for COVID-19 impact such as pregnant persons, during the introduction of new vaccines. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD42021281290.