Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 9.674
Filter
1.
Reprod Domest Anim ; 59(8): e14699, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39104057

ABSTRACT

Many of the reproductive tract infections in the bitches are caused by bacteria that can normally be present on the vaginal mucosa. These bacteria also might have an important role as the cause responsible for pregnancy loss and fetal deaths. The choice of antibiotic therapy for the pregnant animal is narrow and represents a severe problem in veterinary practice, especially due to increased antimicrobial resistance. Due to incorrect antimicrobials use in breeding kennels, the aim of the present study was to assess the occurrence of the bacterial flora isolated from the pregnant bitches and their antibiotic sensitivity. The study was carried out at the private Veterinary clinic in Novi Sad, Serbia. The vaginal swabs were taken from 60 bitches diagnosed with pregnancy and were sent to be laboratory tested. Based on the results, the most common isolated pathogens were Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (20%) and beta-hemolytic streptococci (18.33%). Furthermore, significant resistance to antibiotics from beta-lactams group was detected. It is of particular importance that antimicrobial treatment be evidence based in order to reduce the overuse of antimicrobials due to increased concern regarding antimicrobial resistance.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Dog Diseases , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Staphylococcus , Vagina , Animals , Female , Dogs , Pregnancy , Vagina/microbiology , Dog Diseases/microbiology , Dog Diseases/epidemiology , Dog Diseases/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Staphylococcus/drug effects , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/veterinary , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/microbiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Prevalence , Streptococcus/drug effects , Streptococcus/isolation & purification , Serbia/epidemiology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests
2.
Med Trop Sante Int ; 4(2)2024 06 30.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39099710

ABSTRACT

Zika virus infection, most oft n responsible for a benign arboviral disease or an asymptomatic infection, rarely Guillain-Barré syndrome, can become problematic in pregnant women, due to a risk of fetal malformations, in particular microcephaly linked to its neurotropism. The most recent large-scale epidemic was observed throughout Latin America between 2015 and 2017, causing several hundred thousand cases. Transmission is predominantly vector-borne, but sexual transmission has been described, mainly among travelers, although it undoubtedly accounts for a significant proportion of transmission in epidemic areas. The aim of this review is to describe this sexual transmission, mainly through examples linked to this large-scale epidemic in Latin America, to describe the link with prolonged excretion of infectious viral particles in genital secretions, especially semen but also vaginal secretions, and to highlight possible preventive measures apart from vector transmission, in particular the need for pregnant women or women wishing to become pregnant to avoid visiting countries where circulation of Zika virus is described.


Subject(s)
Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral , Zika Virus Infection , Zika Virus Infection/transmission , Zika Virus Infection/prevention & control , Zika Virus Infection/epidemiology , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral/transmission , Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral/prevention & control , Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/virology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Male , Latin America/epidemiology
3.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr ; 97(1): 6-12, 2024 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39116327

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The number of perinatal HIV cases have continued to decline since the United States achieved the goal of perinatal HIV elimination in 2019. We aimed to evaluate dynamics in perinatal HIV transmission in the metropolitan District of Columbia (DC) area during 2018-2022. SETTING: Children's National Hospital's (CNH) is a major referral site for the metropolitan DC area, including suburban Maryland and Virginia, and evaluates >95% of HIV-exposed infants (HEI) in the region. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of mother-infant pairs with perinatal HIV exposure seen at CNH during 2018-2022. We describe the demographics, intrapartum/postpartum management, and outcomes among mothers and HEI. RESULTS: We analyzed 503 HEI; most (78.9%) were at low risk for perinatal HIV. Most mothers were African or African American (87.1%) and had HIV RNA <50 copies/mL around delivery (78.1%). The proportion of HEI at high risk for perinatal HIV decreased from 28.2% to 15.5% in 2018 and 2020, respectively, but increased to 24.8% in 2022. Most HEI received postnatal antiretroviral drugs for at least 4 weeks (95.3%). Seventy-nine infants (15.7%) were born to mothers diagnosed with HIV during pregnancy. Two infants (0.4%) were diagnosed with perinatally acquired HIV. CONCLUSIONS: We report high rates of antiretroviral drugs use among mother-infant pairs and a low rate of perinatal HIV transmission in metropolitan DC. Despite a 1.8-fold decrease in the number of high-risk perinatal HIV exposures since 2018, this rate rebounded in 2022. There remain opportunities to optimize maternal care and reduce the number of high-risk HEI.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Humans , HIV Infections/transmission , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , Female , Retrospective Studies , Pregnancy , District of Columbia/epidemiology , Adult , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/drug therapy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Young Adult , Infant , Male , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use
4.
Gac Med Mex ; 160(2): 178-185, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39116846

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The WHO presented the initiative: "Global elimination of congenital syphilis (CS): rationale and strategies for action". It establishes that CS is a preventable disease that can be eliminated. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the proportion of missed opportunities for prevention (MOP) of (CS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study. We studied women with children with confirmed diagnosis of CS (NOM-039-SSA2-2002) in the Mexican Social Security Institute in Jalisco from 01/01/2016 to 08/01/2022. The clinical records of the mother, the newborn and the epidemiological study (ES) were reviewed. Each case was classified into one of the MOP categories. RESULTS: 52 cases were reported: 46.2 % (n = 24) were ruled out, 34.6 % (n = 18) confirmed, 15.4 % (n = 8) unknown and 3.8 % (n = 2) probable cases. The HIV test was performed in 61.1 % (n = 11) and syphilis in 72.2 % (n = 13) of the mothers. The MOP in 27.8 % (n = 5) was inadequate treatment or omission of maternal treatment despite a timely diagnosis of syphilis. Treatment was inadequate in 63.6 % (n = 7) of the women who received it. CONCLUSION: The classification of MOP identifies gaps in CS prevention and can guide stakeholders, policy makers and public health prevention programs to reduce the incidence of CS.


ANTECEDENTES: La Organización Mundial de la Salud estableció que la sífilis congénita es una enfermedad prevenible que puede eliminarse. OBJETIVO: Estimar la proporción de oportunidades perdidas en la prevención (OPP) de la sífilis congénita. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio transversal descriptivo. Se eligieron mujeres en cuyos hijos recién nacidos se identificó sífilis congénita entre 2016 y 2022. Se revisaron los expedientes clínicos de la madre, el recién nacido y el estudio epidemiológico. Cada caso se clasificó en una de las categorías de las OPP. RESULTADOS: Se notificaron 52 casos: 46.2 % (n = 24) fue descartado, 34.6 % (n = 18) confirmado, 15.4 % (n = 8) desconocido y 3.8 % (n = 2) probable. Las pruebas para identificar infección por VIH y sífilis se realizaron en 61.1 % (n = 11) y 72.2 % de las madres (n = 13). La OPP en 27.8 % (n = 5) consistió en el tratamiento inadecuado u omisión de tratamiento materno a pesar de diagnóstico oportuno de la sífilis. De quienes recibieron tratamiento, en 63.6 % fue inadecuado (n = 7). CONCLUSIÓN: La clasificación de OPP de sífilis congénita permite identificar brechas en la prevención y dirigir intervenciones de salud pública hacia las principales causas para reducir la incidencia.


Subject(s)
Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Syphilis, Congenital , Humans , Syphilis, Congenital/prevention & control , Syphilis, Congenital/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Mexico/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Adult , Young Adult , Missed Diagnosis
5.
Clinics (Sao Paulo) ; 79: 100454, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39121513

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess the impact of the Gamma coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) variant on pregnant and postpartum women with Cardiovascular Disease (CVD). METHODS: The Influenza Epidemiological Surveillance System database (SIVEP-Gripe), a compulsory notification system for cases of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), was investigated for notified cases of pregnant and postpartum women with reported CVD and SARS due to COVID-19 between February 16, 2020 and May 1, 2021 (when vaccination began), was investigated. In this retrospective cohort, two groups were formed based on symptom onset date, according to the predominance of the variants: original (group 2020) and Gamma (group 2021). Cases with missing information on the presence or absence of CVD were excluded. The comparative analysis was controlled for confounding variables. RESULTS: Among 703 COVID-19 cases notified with CVD (406 patients in 2020 and 297 patients in 2021), compared to 2020, cases in 2021 had more respiratory symptoms (90.6 % vs. 80.1 %, p < 0.001), greater ventilatory support need (75.3 % vs. 53.9 %, p < 0.001), more ICU admission (46.6 % vs. 34.3 %, p = 0.002), longer duration (20.59 ± 14.47 vs. 16.52 ± 12.98 days, p < 0.001), higher mortality (25.6 % vs. 15.5 %, p < 0.001), with more than two-times mortality likelihood in the third trimester (adjusted OR = 2.41, 95 % CI 1.50-3.88, p < 0.001) or puerperium periods (adjusted_OR = 2.15, 95 % CI 1.34-3.44, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In Brazil, pregnant and postpartum women with CVDs in the Gamma variant phase have higher morbidity and mortality than those affected by the original variant of Coronavirus-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiovascular Diseases , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/epidemiology , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Brazil/epidemiology , Prognosis , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/virology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Postpartum Period , Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular , Risk Factors
6.
J Pregnancy ; 2024: 1177119, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39139715

ABSTRACT

Background: The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was more devastating in people with comorbidities such as advanced age and immunodeficiency. Another group affected by COVID-19 was pregnant women. Immunological changes during pregnancy and conditions such as gestational diabetes and pre-eclampsia that occur during pregnancy also have effects on the fetus. The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of PCR-proven COVID-19 infection during pregnancy on fetus and newborn. Methods: Between December 2019 and October 2021, data from pregnant women with COVID-19 symptoms or a history of contact with people with COVID-19, infected with PCR-proven COVID-19 virus, were analyzed retrospectively. Clinical and laboratory data of pregnant women were analyzed. Death data associated with COVID-19 were evaluated. Clinical and laboratory findings of newborns related to COVID-19 and mortality data related to COVID-19 were recorded. The study received approval from the Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital ethics committee (09.07.2021/853). Results: We evaluated 327 pregnant women who were followed up in our hospital and whose deliveries ended in live birth, stillbirth, miscarriage, or curettage. One hundred eighty-five (56.6%) of the pregnant women had at least one COVID-19-related symptom. We evaluated the data of 306 live births, 21 intrauterine fetal deaths, and 13 postnatal deaths. Among the postnatal deaths, five infants succumbed directly due to COVID-19 infection. A total of 23 live-born babies (7.5%) were classified as small for gestational age (SGA), while 80 babies (26.1%) were born before 37 weeks of gestation, and 32 babies (10.4%) were born before 32 weeks. Cord blood gas analysis revealed that 19 infants (6.3%) had pH < 7 and base excess (BE) < -12. The rate of perinatal asphyxia was significantly higher in babies born to mothers who did not survive (p = 0.027). A considerable number of infants, 119 (40.3%), were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Among the seven infants with positive PCR results admitted to the NICU, five (4.2%) did not survive. Conclusion: While COVID-19 infection in pregnancy seriously affects mortality and morbidity in pregnant women, it also causes mortality and morbidity on the fetus.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Pregnancy Outcome , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Pregnancy , Female , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Infant, Newborn , Adult , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Stillbirth/epidemiology , Turkey/epidemiology , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/statistics & numerical data , Abortion, Spontaneous/epidemiology , Abortion, Spontaneous/virology
7.
BMC Pediatr ; 24(1): 526, 2024 Aug 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39143544

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Early-onset neonatal sepsis (EONS) significantly impacts neonatal morbidity and mortality, with maternal bacteremia during the peripartum period being a potential risk factor. This study aims to explore the association between peripartum maternal bacteremia and EONS. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study at the Women's Wellness and Research Center in Doha, Qatar (2015-2019) compared women with and without bacteremia, based on blood cultures taken from up to seven days before to 48 h after delivery, examining the association with EONS. RESULTS: Among the 536 maternal blood cultures analyzed, 102 (19.0%) were positive. The most prevalent organisms were Group B streptococcus (GBS) (39.2%), followed by Escherichia coli (14.7%) and anaerobes (10.8%). Neonates from bacteremic mothers had lower birth weights (2913 ± 86 g vs. 3140 ± 745 g; MD 227.63 g; 95% CI 61.72 - 393.55; p = 0.007), required more resuscitation (27.5% vs. 13.2%; OR 2.48; 95% CI 1.48 - 4.17; p < 0.001), and received antibiotics for ≥ 7 days more frequently (41.2% vs. 16.6%; OR 3.51; 95% CI 2.20 - 5.62; p < 0.001) compared to those from non-bacteremic mothers. Maternal Gram-positive (GP) organisms were more commonly isolated in term gestation (67.9%) compared to Gram-negative (GN) (22.2%) and anaerobic bacteremias (9.9%). During intrapartum, GP bacteremia was predominant (67.1%) vs. GN (21.4%) and Anaerobes (11.4%), with GN bacteremia being more common in postpartum samples. Culture-proven EONS occurred in 0.75% of the cohort, affecting 3.9% of infants from bacteremic mothers vs. none in controls (OR 2.34; 95% CI 1.27 - 4.31; p < 0.001). Culture-negative EONS appeared in 14.7% of infants from bacteremic mothers vs. 7.8% in controls (OR 2.02; 95% CI, 1.05 - 3.88; p = 0.03). Among 40 cases of maternal GBS bacteremia, culture-proven GBS EONS occurred in 3 neonates (7.5%), all from mothers with negative GBS screening, compared to none in the control group. A strong association was found between EONS and maternal bacteremia due to any organism (aOR 2.34; 95% CI, 1.24 - 4.41; p = 0.009), GP bacteremia (aOR 3.66; 95% CI, 1.82 - 7.34; p < 0.001), or GBS (aOR 5.74; 95% CI, 2.57 - 12.81; p < 0.001). Bacteremia due to GN and Anaerobic organisms were not associated with EONS. Chorioamnionitis and antepartum fever were independent predictors for EONS associated with significant bacterial isolates. CONCLUSION: This study underscores the significant impact of maternal GP bacteremia, particularly from GBS, on EONS. The strong association highlights the need for vigilant monitoring and interventions in pregnancies complicated by bacteremia to reduce adverse neonatal outcomes.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia , Neonatal Sepsis , Peripartum Period , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Female , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Bacteremia/microbiology , Neonatal Sepsis/microbiology , Neonatal Sepsis/epidemiology , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Adult , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/microbiology , Qatar/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Streptococcal Infections/epidemiology , Young Adult
8.
PLoS One ; 19(8): e0305525, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39116054

ABSTRACT

Approximately 10-12 million new syphilis infections occur annually worldwide, including in pregnant women. This study identified the factors associated with syphilis in pregnant women admitted to a tertiary maternity ward in the State of Paraná, Brazil. This is an ambispective, paired case-control study (1:2 ratio) conducted from September 2020 to October 2021. Pregnant patients (n = 93) admitted to the maternity ward, who were tested with the Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) and rapid reagent test, were compared with 186 controls, matched by age and period of hospital admission. Sociodemographic, behavioral, prenatal, and maternity healthcare information was collected through interviews. The data were analyzed using binary logistic regression. Results showed that race/skin color other than white (OR: 2.12; 95%CI: 1.19-3.80; p < 0.001), having more than one sexual partner (OR: 3.69; 95%CI: 1.70-8.00; p = 0.001), being a former smoker (OR: 2.07; 95%CI: 1.07-4.01; p = 0.030) and a current smoker (OR: 4.31; 95%CI: 1.55-11.98; p = 0.005), as well as having a history of sexually transmitted infections (OR: 10.87; 95%CI: 4.04-29.27; p < 0.0.01) were risk factors for gestational syphilis. In summary, the study indicated that sociodemographic, behavioral, and healthcare-related variables were associated with gestational syphilis. Therefore, practitioners could benefit from incorporating these factors to deliver evidence-based treatment for gestational syphilis.


Subject(s)
Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Syphilis , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Brazil/epidemiology , Syphilis/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Adult , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/microbiology , Risk Factors , Young Adult , Tertiary Healthcare , Adolescent
9.
PLoS One ; 19(8): e0308634, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39116169

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Co-infections involving human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and syphilis pose significant public health problems during pregnancy. It can increase the risk of adverse outcomes for both the woman and the infant more than each infection alone does. However, the magnitude of these co-infections remains insufficiently documented. Hence, this study aimed to determine the seroprevalence of HIV, HBV, and syphilis co-infections and associated risk factors among pregnant women attending antenatal care in Amhara region referral hospitals in northern Ethiopia. METHODS: A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted in Amhara regional state referral hospitals from January 1 to February 30, 2024, among 606 pregnant women. Pregnant women were selected using a systematic random sampling technique. An interviewer-administered questionnaire and chart review were used to collect data. Data were analyzed in SPSSV26.0. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the magnitude of co-infections, and binary logistic regression was used to determine associated factors. Variables with a P-value < 0.05 were used to declare statistical significance. RESULT: Overall, 4.1% (95% CI: 2.7, 6.1) of pregnant women were co-infected. The prevalence of specific co-infections was 2% (95% CI: 1, 3.5) for HIV/HBV, 1.3% (95% CI: 0.6, 2.6) for HIV/syphilis, and 0.8% (95% CI: 0.3, 1.9) for HBV/syphilis. No cases of triple co-infection were observed. Women with a history of unsafe sex (AOR = 8.2, 95% CI: 1.5, 16.7) and incarceration (AOR = 9.3, 95% CI: 1.6, 20.8) were associated with HIV/syphilis co-infection. For HIV/HBV co-infection, contact with jaundice patients (AOR = 5.5, 95% CI: 1.3, 22.5) and women with a history of STIs (AOR = 4.6, 95% CI: 1.4, 14.9) was significantly associated. Women with STI history (AOR = 6.3, 95% CI: 1.2, 15.9) were also significantly associated with HBV/syphilis co-infection. CONCLUSION: Despite the government's elimination efforts, a relatively high prevalence of coinfections with the infections studied was found among pregnant women. Therefore, HIV, HBV, and syphilis testing and treatment packages should be strengthened by targeting pregnant women with a history of STIs, contact with patients with jaundice, a history of incarceration, and unsafe sex.


Subject(s)
Coinfection , HIV Infections , Hepatitis B , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Prenatal Care , Syphilis , Humans , Female , Syphilis/epidemiology , Syphilis/complications , Pregnancy , Ethiopia/epidemiology , Hepatitis B/epidemiology , Adult , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/complications , Cross-Sectional Studies , Coinfection/epidemiology , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Young Adult , Adolescent , Risk Factors , Prevalence
11.
Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica ; 41(2): 178-184, 2024 Aug 19.
Article in Spanish, English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39166641

ABSTRACT

Motivation for the study. There is a gap in knowledge about vertical transmission of SARS- CoV-2 and its implications for maternal and neonatal health, despite evidence of multisystem involvement in pregnant women with COVID-19. Main findings. The study results suggest low incidence of vertical transmission during pregnancy, with only one PCR-positive case in the placenta and one asymptomatic neonate. Implications. Our results can inform strategies for prevention and management of COVID-19 in pregnant women, as well as guide the development of health policies aimed at protecting maternal and neonatal health during the pandemic. The aim of this study was to analyze the vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in pregnant women with COVID-19 in the Gynecology and Obstetrics Department of the Edgardo Rebagliati Martins National Hospital (HNERM). Twelve pregnant women who met the inclusion criteria were included. Real-time PCR (RT-PCR) tests for SARS-CoV-2 were performed when each woman was admitted to the hospital, placenta samples were collected for pathological evaluation as well. The results showed that vertical transmission of the virus was rare, with an overall low positivity rate in newborns. Although the study has limitations, such as the small number of cases and the lack of electron microscope analysis, it is the first attempt to evaluate vertical transmission in Peru. It is concluded that more research is needed to better understand the relationship between COVID-19 infection and complications during pregnancy.


Se realizó un estudio en el departamento de Ginecología y Obstetricia del Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins (HNERM) con el objetivo analizar la transmisión vertical del SARS-CoV-2 en mujeres embarazadas con COVID-19. Se incluyeron 12 gestantes que cumplían con los criterios de inclusión. Se realizaron pruebas diagnósticas de PCR en tiempo real (RT-PCR) para SARS-CoV-2 durante la admisión de cada gestante y se recolectaron muestras de placenta para su evaluación anatomopatológica. Los resultados mostraron que la transmisión vertical del virus fue poco común, con una tasa general de positividad baja en los recién nacidos. Aunque el estudio presenta limitaciones, como el número reducido de casos y la falta de análisis con microscopio electrónico, constituye el primer intento en Perú de evaluar la transmisión vertical. Se concluye que se necesita más investigación para comprender mejor la relación entre la infección por la COVID-19 y las complicaciones durante el embarazo. Motivación para realizar el estudio. A pesar de la evidencia de una afectación multisistémica en mujeres embarazadas con la COVID-19, existe un vacío de conocimiento sobre la transmisión vertical del virus y sus implicancias en la salud materna y neonatal. Principales hallazgos. Los resultados del estudio sugieren una baja incidencia de transmisión vertical durante el embarazo, con solo un caso positivo de PCR en la placenta y un neonato asintomático. Implicancias. Este resultado pueden informar las estrategias de prevención y manejo de la COVID-19 en mujeres embarazadas, así como guiar el desarrollo de políticas sanitarias dirigidas a proteger la salud materna y neonatal durante la pandemia.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Humans , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/diagnosis , Female , Pregnancy , Peru/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/virology , Adult , Infant, Newborn , Young Adult , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing
12.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol ; 14: 1434677, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39170986

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Candida species, opportunistic yeast, are the second most common cause of female vulvovaginal candidiasis. This study aimed to evaluate the antifungal susceptibility profile of the isolated Candida species in pregnant women in Hajjah governorate, Yemen. Methods: A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 396 pregnant women attending Authority AL-Gumhorri Hospital Hajjah between February and July 2023. Vaginal swabs were collected, and Candida species were isolated and identified based on the standard laboratory method. Furthermore, the antifungal drug susceptibility of Candida species was determined by the Kirby-Bauer technique. Results and discussion: The prevalence of vaginal Candida infection among pregnant women was 61.4%. Candida albicans was the most predominant species (59.26%), followed by Candida krusei(13.58%), Candida Tropicalis (11.12%), Candida Grabata (9.87%), and Candida dubliniensis (6.17%). The highest rate of Candida infections was among women aged 24-30 years (71.9%) who finished primary school (77.8%), with the third trimester (80%), multigravida (66.1%), and recurrent infection (67.7%) showing significant differences (P < 0.05). The Candida albicans isolates were resistant to clotrimazole and itraconazole at 34.7% and 23.6%, respectively.In addition, the resistance of Candida krusei, Candida tropicalis, Candida glabrata, and Candida dublinensis isolates to fluconazole, voriconazole, voriconazole, and nystatin was 57.6%, 63%, 43.8%, and 60%, respectively. Additionally, approximately 46.2% of isolated Candida albicans exhibited one kind of antifungal drug resistance, whereas 38.7% of isolated non-albicans exhibited resistance to three different antifungal agents. According to the above findings, Candida infection is highly prevalent in Yemen and quite widespread. Interventions in health education are advised to increase women's knowledge of vaginitis and its prevention. The antifungal susceptibility test may also be helpful in determining the best medication for each patient.


Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents , Candida , Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Humans , Female , Candida/drug effects , Candida/isolation & purification , Candida/classification , Antifungal Agents/pharmacology , Pregnancy , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Young Adult , Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal/microbiology , Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal/epidemiology , Yemen/epidemiology , Prevalence , Drug Resistance, Fungal , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/microbiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Adolescent , Vagina/microbiology
13.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1417712, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39118975

ABSTRACT

Health emergencies, including pandemics, are not new occurrences; some notable ones occurred in the past. However, the scale of the COVID-19 pandemic is unprecedented. The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the unpreparedness of national health systems in effectively managing health emergencies. During the pandemic, controlling the spread of the virus and hopes of exiting into a post-pandemic era were reliant on research to improve patient care and inform government policies. Nonetheless, research implementation during health emergencies can be challenging in low-resourced settings. This paper presents anecdotes of experiences and offers insight into ways research can be supported during health emergencies. We implemented a longitudinal study to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, including SARS-CoV-2 infection, during pregnancy on maternal and child health outcomes. The study utilized hospital databases to recruit women who were infected and with no known SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy. Mother-infant pairs in the infected and uninfected group were then followed longitudinally for 3 years. Observations, including challenges during planning, record retrieval, tracking, recruitment, and follow-up of eligible women, were reported by research staff. The challenges observed were group into three overarching themes: (a) individual factors, (b) health system challenges, and (c) research operational challenges. Some notable observations include misinformation, misconception, mistrust, underdeveloped health record systems, stigma, and hesitance. Early planning, effective communication, and community awareness can help in implementing a successful research project. Additionally, efforts to improve collaboration and co-creation between health practitioners, researchers, and the public may benefit the implementation of research projects during a health emergency.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , India/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Longitudinal Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Emergencies , Public Health , Adult , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pandemics
14.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 24(1): 518, 2024 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39090584

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To investigate the association between maternal sepsis during pregnancy and poor pregnancy outcome and to identify risk factors for poor birth outcomes and adverse perinatal events. METHODS: We linked the Taiwan Birth Cohort Study (TBCS) database and the Taiwanese National Health Insurance Database (NHID) to conduct this population-based study. We analysed the data of pregnant women who met the criteria for sepsis-3 during pregnancy between 2005 and 2017 as the maternal sepsis cases and selected pregnant women without infection as the non-sepsis comparison cohort. Sepsis during pregnancy and fulfilled the sepsis-3 definition proposed in 2016. The primary outcome included low birth weight (LBW, < 2500 g) and preterm birth (< 34 weeks), and the secondary outcome was the occurrence of adverse perinatal events. RESULTS: We enrolled 2,732 women who met the criteria for sepsis-3 during pregnancy and 196,333 non-sepsis controls. We found that the development of maternal sepsis was highly associated with unfavourable pregnancy outcomes, including LBW (adjOR 9.51, 95% CI 8.73-10.36), preterm birth < 34 weeks (adjOR 11.69, 95%CI 10.64-12.84), and the adverse perinatal events (adjOR 3.09, 95% CI 2.83-3.36). We also identified that socio-economically disadvantaged status was slightly associated with an increased risk for low birth weight and preterm birth. CONCLUSION: We found that the development of maternal sepsis was highly associated with LBW, preterm birth and adverse perinatal events. Our findings highlight the prolonged impact of maternal sepsis on pregnancy outcomes and indicate the need for vigilance among pregnant women with sepsis.


Subject(s)
Infant, Low Birth Weight , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Pregnancy Outcome , Premature Birth , Sepsis , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Taiwan/epidemiology , Sepsis/epidemiology , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Databases, Factual , Young Adult
15.
J Med Life ; 17(5): 471-477, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39144686

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic had a major impact on health systems worldwide, and Romania was no exception. The impact on healthcare expenses for pregnant women was considerable, especially in COVID-19-only tertiary centers. This study aimed to analyze the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare costs in a designated COVID-19 maternity ward. We conducted an observational study comparing pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 (study group) to those without the infection (control group). Patients were recruited at Bucur Maternity Hospital from March 2020 to March 2022. We evaluated expenses for the entire period of hospitalization, treatment, medical supplies, and medical investigations. The study included 600 pregnant women, divided equally into two groups of 300 each. Significant cost differences were observed between the COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 groups: medication costs (664.56 EUR vs. 39.49 EUR), administrative costs (191.79 EUR vs. 30.28 EUR), and medical investigation costs (191.15 EUR vs. 29.42 EUR). The costs for a severe case of COVID-19 were about two times higher than a mild case and 70 times higher than a non-COVID-19 case (P <0.001). We identified a significant cost increase due to SARS-CoV-2 infection in our unit. The expenses were augmented by the time of hospitalization, medication, and medical investigations. COVID-19 had a significant impact on healthcare costs, mostly among pregnant women with severe disease. The strategy of operating exclusively as a COVID-19 unit proved to be inefficient and highly costly to our hospital.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Health Care Costs , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , SARS-CoV-2 , Tertiary Care Centers , Humans , Female , COVID-19/economics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Adult , Romania/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/economics , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/virology , Tertiary Care Centers/economics , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Maternity/economics , Cost of Illness , Hospitalization/economics , Pandemics/economics
16.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 1762, 2024 Jul 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38956517

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pregnant women are a vulnerable population to COVID-19 given an increased susceptibility to severe SARS-CoV-2 infection and pregnancy complications. However, few SARS-CoV-2 serological surveys have been performed among this population to assess the extent of the infection in sub-Saharan countries. The objectives of this study were to determine SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among Beninese pregnant women, to identify spatial seropositivity clusters and to analyse factors associated with the infection. METHODS: A cross-sectional study including women in their third trimester of pregnancy attending the antenatal care (ANC) clinics at Allada (south Benin) and Natitingou (north Benin) was conducted. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) for detection of IgG/IgM against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein were performed using capillary blood. Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and associations between SARS-CoV-2 serostatus and maternal characteristics were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression. Spatial analyses were performed using the spatial scan statistics to identify spatial clusters of SARS-CoV-2 infection. RESULTS: A total of 861 pregnant women were enrolled between May 4 and June 29, 2022. 58/861 (6.7%) participants reported having received COVID-19 vaccine. None of the participants had been diagnosed with COVID-19 during their pregnancy. SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were detected in 607/802 (75.7%; 95% CI 72.56%-78.62%) of unvaccinated participants. Several urban and rural spatial clusters of SARS-CoV-2 cases were identified in Allada and one urban spatial cluster was identified in Natitingou. Unvaccinated participants from Allada with at least one previous morbidity were at a three-times higher risk of presenting SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (OR = 2.89; 95%CI 1.19%-7.00%). CONCLUSION: Three out of four pregnant women had SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, suggesting a high virus circulation among pregnant women in Benin, while COVID-19 vaccination coverage was low. Pregnant women with comorbidities may be at increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. This population should be prioritized for COVID-19 diagnosis and vaccination in order to prevent its deleterious effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT06170320 (retrospectively registered on December 21, 2023).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/diagnosis , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Benin/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Young Adult , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Pregnancy Trimester, Third
17.
PLoS One ; 19(7): e0306992, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38985777

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Clinical risk score tools require validation in diverse settings and populations before they are widely implemented. We aimed to externally validate an HIV risk assessment tool for predicting HIV acquisition among pregnant and postpartum women. In the context of prevention of mother-to-child transmission programs, risk score tools could be used to prioritize retesting efforts and delivery of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to pregnant and postpartum women most at risk for HIV acquisition while minimizing unnecessary perinatal exposure. METHODS: Data from women enrolled in a cross-sectional study of programmatic HIV retesting and/or receiving maternal and child health care services at five facilities in Western Kenya were used to validate the predictive ability of a simplified risk score previously developed for pregnant/postpartum women. Incident HIV infections were defined as new HIV diagnoses following confirmed negative or unknown status during pregnancy. Predictive performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and Brier score. RESULTS: Among 1266 women with 35 incident HIV infections, we found an AUC for predicting HIV acquisition of 0.60 (95% CI, 0.51, 0.69), with a Brier score of 0.27. A risk score >6 was associated with a 2.9-fold increase in the odds of HIV acquisition (95% CI, 1.48, 5.70; p = 0.002) vs scores ≤6. Women with risk scores >6 were 27% (346/1266) of the population but accounted for 52% of HIV acquisitions. Syphilis, age at sexual debut, and unknown partner HIV status were significantly associated with increased risk of HIV in this cohort. CONCLUSION: The simplified risk score performed moderately at predicting risk of HIV acquisition in this population of pregnant and postpartum women and may be useful to guide PrEP use or counseling.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Postpartum Period , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/diagnosis , Kenya/epidemiology , Adult , Risk Assessment/methods , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Young Adult , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , Risk Factors , ROC Curve , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis , Adolescent
18.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 18(6): 925-931, 2024 Jun 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38990996

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is the most frequent vaginal infection affecting women of childbearing age worldwide. It is associated with significant adverse healthcare outcomes, especially during pregnancy. Although screening for BV could reduce potential pregnancy-related obstetric complications, there is no routine screening of pregnant women for BV in Vietnam. We aimed to identify the prevalence of BV among pregnant women and the associated factors in two tertiary hospitals in Hue, Vietnam. METHODOLOGY: This cross-sectional descriptive study included 885 pregnant women in third trimester, who received routine antenatal care in the Hue Central Hospital and Hue University Hospital of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue city, Thua Thien Hue province, Vietnam. Gram-stained vaginal smears were used for calculating the Nugent score and recording the fungal elements. RESULTS: In total, 435 (49.1%) women had a normal BV score, 352 (39.8%) had intermediate vaginal microbiota, and 98 (11.1%) had BV. Among the 98 women with BV, 71 (72.4%) also had fungal infection. There was a significant association of BV with discharge (p = 0.004) and abnormal cervix (p = 0.014). BV was significantly more frequent among the women who reported previous abortion or miscarriage (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: About a tenth of women in Thua Thien Hue province have BV in the third trimester of pregnancy being associated with previous adverse outcome. Discharge with fishy odour is still a characteristic feature among subtle clinical presentations of BV. Better awareness about this disease and routine test-and-treat management during pregnancy may improve pregnancy outcome.


Subject(s)
Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Vaginosis, Bacterial , Humans , Female , Vaginosis, Bacterial/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Vietnam/epidemiology , Adult , Prevalence , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/microbiology , Young Adult , Risk Factors , Adolescent , Vagina/microbiology , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy Trimester, Third
19.
Am J Reprod Immunol ; 92(1): e13896, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38994889

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recent data in nonpregnant individuals suggest a protective effect of influenza vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection and its severity. OBJECTIVES: Our primary objective was to evaluate whether influenza vaccination was associated with COVID-19 severity and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes among those infected with SARS-CoV-2. The secondary objective was to examine the association between influenza vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection. STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a multicenter retrospective cohort of pregnant people who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 between March and August 2020, and a cohort of random deliveries during the same time period. The associations between 2019 influenza vaccination and the primary outcome of moderate-to-critical COVID-19 as well as maternal and perinatal outcomes were examined among all people who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 between March and August 2020. The association between 2019 influenza vaccination and having a positive SARS-CoV-2 test was examined among a cohort of individuals who delivered on randomly selected dates between March and August 2020. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of 2325 people who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, 1068 (45.9%) were vaccinated against influenza in 2019. Those who received the influenza vaccine were older, leaner, more likely to have private insurance, and identify as White or Hispanic. They were less likely to smoke tobacco and identify as Black. Overall, 419 (18.0%) had moderate, 193 (8.3%) severe, and 52 (2.2%) critical COVID-19. There was no association between influenza vaccination and moderate-to-critical COVID-19 (29.2% vs. 28.0%, adjusted OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.90-1.34) or adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes among those who tested positive. Of 8152 people who delivered in 2020, 4658 (57.1%) received the influenza vaccine. Prior vaccination was not associated with a difference in the odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection (3.8% vs. 4.2%, adjusted OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.74-1.19). CONCLUSION: Prior influenza vaccination was not associated with decreased severity of COVID-19 or lower odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/epidemiology , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Adult , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Pregnancy Outcome , Infant, Newborn , Young Adult , Severity of Illness Index
20.
PLoS One ; 19(7): e0305838, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39012904

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Africa exhibits a considerably high prevalence of the hepatitis B virus among pregnant women. Furthermore, there is a discernible lack of a well-established surveillance system to adequately monitor and comprehend the epidemiology of the hepatitis B virus, particularly among pregnant women. The eradication efforts of the virus in Africa have been impeded by the significant disease burden in the region, and there is a lack of evidence regarding the pooled prevalence of the hepatitis B virus in Africa. Consequently, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to determine the prevalence of hepatitis B virus infection among pregnant women in Africa. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search using reputable databases such as PubMed, Advanced Google Scholar, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. The search spanned from July 2013 to July 2023 and included all relevant articles published within this period. To identify potentially eligible articles, we conducted a comprehensive manual review of the reference lists of the identified studies. Our review encompassed articles from the African Journal Online. The analysis focused on observational studies published in peer-reviewed journals that reported the prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen-positive testing among pregnant women. We utilized the Newcastle-Ottawa critical appraisal checklist to assess the methodological quality of each paper. Finally, a meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Out of the 774 studies identified, 31 studies involving 33,967 pregnant women were selected for the meta-analysis. According to the random-effects model, the combined prevalence of hepatitis B virus among pregnant women was 6.77% [95% CI: 5.72, 7.83]. The I2 statistic was calculated to be 95.57% (p = 0.00), indicating significant heterogeneity among the studies. The high I2 value of 95.57% suggests a substantial degree of heterogeneity. A subgroup meta-analysis revealed that factors such as time-dependent bias, sample size dependence, or individual variation among study participants contributed to this heterogeneity (p-difference < 0.05). CONCLUSION: According to the findings of this study, the pooled prevalence of hepatitis B infection among pregnant women in Africa was found to be intermediate-high. It is recommended that policymakers implement hepatitis B virus immunization programs targeting pregnant women and their new-born babies at higher risk of exposure.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis B virus , Hepatitis B , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Humans , Pregnancy , Female , Hepatitis B/epidemiology , Prevalence , Africa/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/virology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL