Advances and applications of RNA vaccines in tumor treatment.

Compared to other types of tumor vaccines, RNA vaccines have emerged as promising alternatives to conventional vaccine therapy due to their high efficiency, rapid development capability, and potential for low-cost manufacturing and safe drug delivery. RNA vaccines mainly include mRNA, circular RNA (circRNA), and Self-amplifying mRNA(SAM). Different RNA vaccine platforms for different tumors have shown encouraging results in animal and human models. This review comprehensively describes the advances and applications of RNA vaccines in antitumor therapy. Future directions for extending this promising vaccine platform to a wide range of therapeutic uses are also discussed.

Beyond the danger signal: RNA aggregates orchestrate immunotherapy.

Mendez-Gomez et al. recently demonstrated the transformative potential of RNA-lipid particle aggregates (RNA-LPAs) in immunotherapy. By reprogramming the tumor microenvironment (TME) and potentiating antitumor immunity, RNA-LPAs target primary tumors and elicit robust systemic immunity. This innovative platform holds promise for translating preclinical success into tangible clinical benefits.

The potential of RNA therapeutics in dermatology.

Ribonucleic acid (RNA) therapeutics hold great potential for the advancement of dermatological treatments due to, among other reasons, the possibility of treating previously undruggable targets, high specificity with minimal side effects, and ability to include multiple RNA targets in a single product. Although there have been research relating to RNA therapeutics for decades, there have not been many products translated for clinical use until recently. This may be because of challenges to the application of RNA therapeutics, including the dearth of effective modes of delivery to the target, and rapid degradation of RNA in the human body and environment. This article aims to provide insight on (1) the wide-ranging possibilities of RNA therapeutics in the field of dermatology as well as (2) how key challenges can be addressed, so as to encourage the development of novel dermatological treatments. We also share our experience on how RNA therapeutics have been applied in the management of hypertrophic and keloid scars.

Targeting pediatric solid tumors in the new era of RNA therapeutics.

Despite substantial progress in pediatric cancer treatment, poor prognosis remained for patients with recurrent or metastatic disease, given the limitations of approved targeted treatments and immunotherapies. RNA therapeutics offer significant potential for addressing a broad spectrum of diseases, including cancer. Advances in manufacturing and delivery systems are paving the way for the rapid development of therapeutic RNAs for clinical applications. This review summarizes therapeutic RNA classifications and the mechanisms of action, highlighting their potential in manipulating major cancer-related pathways and biological effects. We also focus on the pre-clinical investigation of RNA molecules with efficient delivery systems for their therapeutic potential targeting pediatric solid tumors.

Advancements in clinical RNA therapeutics: Present developments and prospective outlooks.

RNA molecules have emerged as promising clinical therapeutics due to their ability to target "undruggable" proteins or molecules with high precision and minimal side effects. Nevertheless, the primary challenge in RNA therapeutics lies in rapid degradation and clearance from systemic circulation, the inability to traverse cell membranes, and the efficient intracellular delivery of bioactive RNA molecules. In this review, we explore the implications of RNAs in diseases and provide a chronological overview of the development of RNA therapeutics. Additionally, we summarize the technological advances in RNA-screening design, encompassing various RNA databases and design platforms. The paper then presents an update on FDA-approved RNA therapeutics and those currently undergoing clinical trials for various diseases, with a specific emphasis on RNA medicine and RNA vaccines.

RNA aggregates harness the danger response for potent cancer immunotherapy.

Cancer immunotherapy remains limited by poor antigenicity and a regulatory tumor microenvironment (TME). Here, we create "onion-like" multi-lamellar RNA lipid particle aggregates (LPAs) to substantially enhance the payload packaging and immunogenicity of tumor mRNA antigens. Unlike current mRNA vaccine designs that rely on payload packaging into nanoparticle cores for Toll-like receptor engagement in immune cells, systemically administered RNA-LPAs activate RIG-I in stromal cells, eliciting massive cytokine/chemokine response and dendritic cell/lymphocyte trafficking that provokes cancer immunogenicity and mediates rejection of both early- and late-stage murine tumor models. In client-owned canines with terminal gliomas, RNA-LPAs improved survivorship and reprogrammed the TME, which became "hot" within days of a single infusion. In a first-in-human trial, RNA-LPAs elicited rapid cytokine/chemokine release, immune activation/trafficking, tissue-confirmed pseudoprogression, and glioma-specific immune responses in glioblastoma patients. These data support RNA-LPAs as a new technology that simultaneously reprograms the TME while eliciting rapid and enduring cancer immunotherapy.

Frameworks for transformational breakthroughs in RNA-based medicines.

RNA has sparked a revolution in modern medicine, with the potential to transform the way we treat diseases. Recent regulatory approvals, hundreds of new clinical trials, the emergence of CRISPR gene editing, and the effectiveness of mRNA vaccines in dramatic response to the COVID-19 pandemic have converged to create tremendous momentum and expectation. However, challenges with this relatively new class of drugs persist and require specialized knowledge and expertise to overcome. This Review explores shared strategies for developing RNA drug platforms, including layering technologies, addressing common biases and identifying gaps in understanding. It discusses the potential of RNA-based therapeutics to transform medicine, as well as the challenges associated with improving applicability, efficacy and safety profiles. Insights gained from RNA modalities such as antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) and small interfering RNAs are used to identify important next steps for mRNA and gene editing technologies.

Blood RNA biomarkers for tuberculosis screening in people living with HIV before antiretroviral therapy initiation: a diagnostic accuracy study.

BACKGROUND: Undiagnosed tuberculosis remains a major threat for people living with HIV. Multiple blood transcriptomic biomarkers have shown promise for tuberculosis diagnosis. We sought to evaluate their diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility for systematic pre-antiretroviral therapy (ART) tuberculosis screening. METHODS: We enrolled consecutive adults (age ≥18 years) referred to start ART at a community health centre in Cape Town, South Africa, irrespective of symptoms. Sputa were obtained (using induction if required) for two liquid cultures. Whole-blood RNA samples underwent transcriptional profiling using a custom Nanostring gene panel. We measured the diagnostic accuracy of seven candidate RNA signatures (one single gene biomarker [BATF2] and six multigene biomarkers) for the reference standard of Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture status, using area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analysis, and sensitivity and specificity at prespecified thresholds (two standard scores above the mean of healthy controls; Z2). Clinical utility was assessed by calculating net benefit in decision curve analysis. We compared performance with C-reactive protein (CRP; threshold ≥5 mg/L), WHO four-symptom screen (W4SS), and the WHO target product profile for tuberculosis triage tests. FINDINGS: A total of 707 people living with HIV (407 [58%] female and 300 [42%] male) were included, with median CD4 count 306 cells per mm3 (IQR 184-486). Of 676 participants with available sputum culture results, 89 (13%) had culture-confirmed tuberculosis. The seven RNA signatures were moderately to highly correlated (Spearman rank coefficients 0·42-0·93) and discriminated tuberculosis culture positivity with similar AUROCs (0·73-0·80), but none statistically better than CRP (AUROC 0·78, 95% CI 0·72-0·83). Diagnostic accuracy was similar across CD4 count strata, but lower among participants with negative W4SS (AUROCs 0·56-0·65) compared with positive (AUROCs 0·75-0·84). The RNA biomarker with the highest AUROC point estimate was a four-gene signature (Suliman4; AUROC 0·80, 95% CI 0·75-0·86), with sensitivity 83% (95% CI 74-90) and specificity 59% (55-63) at the Z2 threshold. In decision curve analysis, Suliman4 and CRP had similar clinical utility to guide confirmatory tuberculosis testing, but both had higher net benefit than W4SS. In exploratory analyses, an approach combining CRP (≥5 mg/L) and Suliman4 (≥Z2) had sensitivity of 80% (70-87), specificity of 70% (66-74), and higher net benefit than either biomarker alone. INTERPRETATION: RNA biomarkers showed better clinical utility to guide confirmatory tuberculosis testing for people living with HIV before ART initiation than symptom-based screening, but their performance did not exceed that of CRP and fell short of WHO recommended targets. Interferon-independent approaches might be required to improve accuracy of host-response biomarkers to support tuberculosis screening before ART initiation. FUNDING: South African Medical Research Council, European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership 2, National Institutes of Health National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, The Wellcome Trust, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Royal College of Physicians London.

HMOX1 regulates ferroptosis via mic14 and its impact on chemotherapy resistance in small-cell lung cancer.

This study aimed to investigate the role and molecular mechanism of heme oxygenase-1 (HMOX1) in chemotherapy resistance in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Employed bioinformatics, qPCR, and Western Blot to assess HMOX1 levels in SCLC versus normal tissues and its prognostic relevance. CCK-8, flow cytometry, and thiobarbituric acid assays determined HMOX1's impact on SCLC chemosensitivity, ferroptosis markers, lipid peroxidation, and mic14's role in chemoresistance. In the GSE40275 and GSE60052 cohorts, HMOX1 expression was downregulated in SCLC tissues compared to normal tissues. Higher HMOX1 expression was associated with improved prognosis in the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Hospital cohort and GSE60052 cohort. The RNA and protein levels of HMOX1 were reduced in drug-resistant SCLC cell lines compared to chemosensitive cell lines. Upregulation of HMOX1 increased chemosensitivity and reduced drug resistance in SCLC, while downregulation of HMOX1 decreased chemosensitivity and increased drug resistance. Upregulation of HMOX1 elevated the expression of ferroptosis-related proteins ACSL4, CD71, Transferrin, Ferritin Heavy Chain, and Ferritin Light Chain, while decreasing the expression of GPX4 and xCT. Conversely, downregulation of HMOX1 decreased the expression of ACSL4, CD71, Transferrin, Ferritin Heavy Chain, and Ferritin Light Chain, while increasing the expression of GPX4 and xCT. Upregulation of HMOX1 promoted cellular lipid peroxidation, whereas downregulation of HMOX1 inhibited cellular lipid peroxidation. Upregulation of HMOX1 reduced the RNA level of mic14, while downregulation of HMOX1 increased the RNA level of mic14. mic14 exhibited inhibitory effects on cellular lipid peroxidation in SCLC cells and contributed to reduced chemosensitivity and increased drug resistance in chemoresistant SCLC cell lines. HMOX1 plays a role in ferroptosis by regulating mic14 expression, thereby reversing chemoresistance in SCLC.

Translational adaptation in breast cancer metastasis and emerging therapeutic opportunities.

Breast cancer's tendency to metastasize poses a critical barrier to effective treatment, making it a leading cause of mortality among women worldwide. A growing body of evidence is showing that translational adaptation is emerging as a key mechanism enabling cancer cells to thrive in the dynamic tumor microenvironment (TME). Here, we systematically summarize how breast cancer cells utilize translational adaptation to drive metastasis, highlighting the intricate regulation by specific translation machinery and mRNA attributes such as sequences and structures, along with the involvement of tRNAs and other trans-acting RNAs. We provide an overview of the latest findings and emerging concepts in this area, discussing their potential implications for therapeutic strategies in breast cancer.

RNA therapeutics for regenerative medicine.

It is estimated that millions of people around the world experience various types of tissue injuries every year. Regenerative medicine was born and developed for understanding and application with the aim of replacing affected organs or some cells. The research, manufacture, production, and distribution of RNA in cells have acted as a basic foundation for the development and testing of therapies and treatments that are widely applied in different fields of medicine. Vaccines against COVID-19 are considered one of the brilliant and outstanding successes of RNA therapeutics research. With the characteristics of bio-derived RNA therapeutics, the mechanism of rapid implementation, safe production, and flexibility to create proteins depending on actual requirements. Based on the advantages above in this review, we discuss RNA therapeutics for regenerative medicine, and the types of RNA therapies currently being used for regenerative medicine. The relationship between disease and regenerative medicine is currently being studied or tested in RNA therapeutics. We have also covered the mechanisms of action of RNA therapy for regenerative medicine and some of the limitations in our current understanding of the effects of RNA therapy in this area. Additionally, we have also covered developing RNA therapeutics for regenerative medicine, focusing on RNA therapeutics for regenerative medicine. As a final point, we discuss potential applications for therapeutics for regenerative medicine in the future, as well as their mechanisms.

[Research Progress of Circular RNA in Acute Myeloid Leukemia --Review].

Acute myeloid leukemia(AML) is a malignant tumor of the blood system that is highly heterogeneous in terms of pathogenesis, genetic background and prognostic outcome, with an extremely high fatality rate and recurrence rate. Therefore, exploring new treatment methods and diagnostic strategies is one of the ways to improve the survival rate of patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Circular RNA (circRNA) is a special kind of noncoding RNA, which plays an important role in gene transcription, translation and epigenetic modification, and participates in the disease progression and prognosis of multiple solid tumors. At present, it has found that the abnormal expression of circRNA is closely related to the occurrence, development, drug resistance and prognosis of acute myeloid leukemia.Clinically, it can be used as a new biomarker and potential therapeutic target for AML. This article briefly reviews the research progress of circRNA in acute myeloid leukemia, aiming to provide new strategies for optimizing the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of leukemia.

Recent applications of RNA therapeutic in clinics.

Ribonucleic acid (RNA) therapy has been extensively researched for several decades and has garnered significant attention in recent years owing to its potential in treating a broad spectrum of diseases. It falls under the domain of gene therapy, leveraging RNA molecules as a therapeutic approach in medicine. RNA can be targeted using small-molecule drugs, or RNA molecules themselves can serve as drugs by interacting with proteins or other RNA molecules. While several RNA drugs have been granted clinical approval, numerous RNA-based therapeutics are presently undergoing clinical investigation or testing for various conditions, including genetic disorders, viral infections, and diverse forms of cancer. These therapies offer several advantages, such as high specificity, enabling precise targeting of disease-related genes or proteins, cost-effectiveness, and a relatively straightforward manufacturing process. Nevertheless, successful translation of RNA therapies into widespread clinical use necessitates addressing challenges related to delivery, stability, and potential off-target effects. This chapter provides a comprehensive overview of the general concepts of various classes of RNA-based therapeutics, the mechanistic basis of their function, as well as recent applications of RNA therapeutic in clinics.

Advantages and disadvantages of RNA therapeutics.

RNA therapeutics is an innovative and rapidly evolving field at the forefront of medical research and biotechnology. Recently, many studies have shown that diverse RNA types play important roles in cells. Besides the protein translation coding, they also express and regulate a variety of cellular pathways. Indeed, along with the research and studies, many drugs and vaccines were developed from RNAs, including both coding and non-coding RNA. Some cases were approved to be medicines or under clinical trial. After years of use and application, they have shown a bright opportunity to prevent and treat many fatal and rare diseases with many strong points, such as fast production and long-term effects. Besides, they still have some drawbacks that need to be overcome, like stability or delivery to become the new generation of medicine. Therefore, this chapter focuses on providing an overview of the advantages and disadvantages of RNA therapeutics as well as some crucial points for future development.

RNA therapeutics for the treatment of blood disorders.

Blood disorders are defined as diseases related to the structure, function, and formation of blood cells. These diseases lead to increased years of life loss, reduced quality of life, and increased financial burden for social security systems around the world. Common blood disorder treatments such as using chemical drugs, organ transplants, or stem cell therapy have not yet approached the best goals, and treatment costs are also very high. RNA with a research history dating back several decades has emerged as a potential method to treat hematological diseases. A number of clinical trials have been conducted to pave the way for the use of RNA molecules to cure blood disorders. This novel approach takes advantage of regulatory mechanisms and the versatility of RNA-based oligonucleotides to target genes and cellular pathways involved in the pathogenesis of specific diseases. Despite positive results, currently, there is no RNA drug to treat blood-related diseases approved or marketed. Before the clinical adoption of RNA-based therapies, challenges such as safe delivery of RNA molecules to the target site and off-target effects of injected RNA in the body need to be addressed. In brief, RNA-based therapies open novel avenues for the treatment of hematological diseases, and clinical trials for approval and practical use of RNA-targeted are crucial.

Switching to dolutegravir plus rilpivirine versus maintaining current antiretroviral therapy regimen in virologically suppressed people with HIV-1 and the Lys103Asn (K103N) mutation: 48-week results from a randomised, open-label pilot clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The combination of dolutegravir plus rilpivirine has been studied in people with virologically suppressed HIV with no previous history of treatment failure or resistance. We investigated the potential to maintain viral suppression with dolutegravir plus rilpivirine in people with Lys103Asn mutations whose HIV was previously managed with other treatment regimens. METHODS: In this open-label pilot trial at 32 clinical sites in seven European countries, virologically suppressed, HBsAg-negative adults aged 18 years or older with HIV-1 and Lys103Asn mutations were randomly assigned (2:1) to switch to 50 mg dolutegravir plus 25 mg rilpivirine (given as a single tablet) once daily or to continue their current antiretroviral therapy regimen (control group). After 48 weeks, participants in the control group also switched to dolutegravir plus rilpivirine. Randomisation was stratified by country, and a computer-generated randomisation list with permuted blocks within strata was used to assign participants to treatment groups. The primary endpoints were virological failure (ie, two consecutive measurements of 50 copies or more of HIV RNA per mL at least 2 weeks apart) and virological suppression (the proportion of participants with fewer than 50 copies of HIV RNA per mL) at week 48 (week 96 data will be reported separately). Analyses were done in the modified intention-to-treat population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of the study medication. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05349838, and EudraCT, 2017-004040-38. FINDINGS: Between Nov 5, 2018, and Dec 9, 2020, 140 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned, 95 to the dolutegravir plus rilpivirine group and 45 to the control group. Virological failure was recorded in three participants (3·2%, 95% CI 0·7 to 9·0) in the the dolutegravir plus rilpivirine group and one (2·2%, 0·1 to 11·8) in the control group. The proportion of participants in whom virological suppression was maintained at week 48 was 88·4% (80·2 to 94·1) in the dolutegravir plus rilpivirine group versus 88·9% (75·9 to 96·3) in the control group (difference -0·5, -11·7 to 10·7). Significantly more adverse events were recorded in the dolutegravir plus rilpivirine group than in the control group (234 vs 72; p=0·0034), but the proportion of participants who reported at least one adverse event was similar between groups (76 [80%] of 95 vs 33 [73%] of 45; p=0·39). The frequency of serious adverse events was low and similar between groups. INTERPRETATION: Virological suppression was maintained at week 48 in most participants with Lys103Asn mutations when they switched from standard regimens to dolutegravir plus rilpivirine. The results of this pilot study, if maintained when the week 96 data are reported, support conduct of a large, well-powered trial of dolutegravir plus rilpivirine. FUNDING: ViiV Healthcare.

Safety of teropavimab and zinlirvimab with lenacapavir once every 6 months for HIV treatment: a phase 1b, randomised, proof-of-concept study.

BACKGROUND: Long-acting treatment for HIV has potential to improve adherence, provide durable viral suppression, and have long-term individual and public health benefits. We evaluated treatment with two antibodies that broadly and potently neutralise HIV (broadly neutralising antibodies; bNAbs), combined with lenacapavir, a long-acting capsid inhibitor, as a long-acting regimen. METHODS: This ongoing, randomised, blind, phase 1b proof-of-concept study conducted at 11 HIV treatment centres in the USA included adults with a plasma HIV-1 RNA concentration below 50 copies per mL who had at least 18 months on oral antiretroviral therapy (ART), CD4 counts of at least 500 cells per µL, and protocol-defined susceptibility to bNAbs teropavimab (3BNC117-LS) and zinlirvimab (10-1074-LS). Participants stopped oral ART and were randomly assigned (1:1) to one dose of 927 mg subcutaneous lenacapavir plus an oral loading dose, 30 mg/kg intravenous teropavimab, and 10 mg/kg or 30 mg/kg intravenous zinlirvimab on day 1. Investigational site personnel and participants were masked to treatment assignment throughout the randomised period. The primary endpoint was incidence of serious adverse events until week 26 in all randomly assigned participants who received one dose or more of any study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04811040. FINDINGS: Between June 29 and Dec 8, 2021, 21 participants were randomly assigned, ten in each group received the complete study regimen and one withdrew before completing the regimen on day 1. 18 (86%) of 21 participants were male; participants ranged in age from 25 years to 61 years and had a median CD4 cell count of 909 (IQR 687-1270) cells per µL at study entry. No serious adverse events occurred. Two grade 3 adverse events occurred (lenacapavir injection-site erythaema and injection-site cellulitis), which had both resolved. The most common adverse events were symptoms of injection-site reactions, reported in 17 (85%) of 20 participants who received subcutaneous lenacapavir; 12 (60%) of 20 were grade 1. One (10%; 95% CI 0-45) participant had viral rebound (confirmed HIV-1 RNA concentration of ≥50 copies per mL) in the zinlirvimab 10 mg/kg group, which was resuppressed on ART, and one participant in the zinlirvimab 30 mg/kg group withdrew at week 12 with HIV RNA <50 copies per mL. INTERPRETATION: Lenacapavir with teropavimab and zinlirvimab 10 mg/kg or 30 mg/kg was generally well tolerated with no serious adverse events. HIV-1 suppression for at least 26 weeks is feasible with this regimen at either zinlirvimab dose in selected people with HIV-1. FUNDING: Gilead Sciences.

An engineered poly(A) tail attenuates gut ischemia/reperfusion-induced acute lung injury.

BACKGROUND: Gut ischemia/reperfusion causes the release of damage-associated molecular patterns, leading to acute lung injury and high mortality. Cold-inducible ribonucleic acid-binding protein is a ribonucleic acid chaperon that binds the polyadenylation tail of messenger ribonucleic acid intracellularly. Upon cell stress, cold-inducible ribonucleic acid-binding protein is released, and extracellular cold-inducible ribonucleic acid-binding protein acts as a damage-associated molecular pattern, worsening inflammation. To inhibit extracellular cold-inducible ribonucleic acid-binding protein, we have recently developed an engineered polyadenylation tail named A12. Here, we sought to investigate the therapeutic potential of A12 in gut ischemia/reperfusion-induced acute lung injury. METHODS: Male C57BL6/J mice underwent superior mesenteric artery occlusion and were treated with intraperitoneal A12 (0.5 nmol/g body weight) or vehicle at the time of reperfusion. Blood and lungs were collected 4 hours after gut ischemia/reperfusion. Systemic levels of extracellular cold-inducible ribonucleic acid-binding protein, interleukin-6, aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase, and lactate dehydrogenase were determined. The pulmonary gene expression of cytokines (interleukin-6, interleukin-1ß) and chemokines (macrophage-inflammatory protein-2, keratinocyte-derived chemokine) was also assessed. In addition, lung myeloperoxidase, injury score, and cell death were determined. Mice were monitored for 48 hours after gut ischemia/reperfusion for survival assessment. RESULTS: Gut ischemia/reperfusion significantly increased the serum extracellular cold-inducible ribonucleic acid-binding protein levels. A12 treatment markedly reduced the elevated serum interleukin-6, alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, and lactate dehydrogenase by 53%, 23%, 23%, and 24%, respectively, in gut ischemia/reperfusion mice. A12 also significantly decreased cytokine and chemokine messenger ribonucleic acids and myeloperoxidase activity in the lungs of gut ischemia/reperfusion mice. Histological analysis revealed that A12 attenuated tissue injury and cell death in the lungs of gut ischemia/reperfusion mice. Finally, administration of A12 markedly improved the survival of gut ischemia/reperfusion mice. CONCLUSION: A12, a novel extracellular cold-inducible ribonucleic acid-binding protein inhibitor, diminishes inflammation and mitigates acute lung injury when employed as a treatment during gut ischemia/reperfusion. Hence, the targeted approach toward extracellular cold-inducible ribonucleic acid-binding protein emerges as a promising therapeutic strategy for alleviating gut ischemia/reperfusion-induced acute lung injury.