Assessment of performance and comparison of three commercial HDV RNA detection assays: implications for diagnosis and treatment monitoring.

Objectives: Precise HDV-RNA detection and quantification are pivotal for diagnosis and monitoring of response to newly approved treatment. We evaluate the performance of three HDV RNA detection and quantification assays. Methods: Hepatitis Delta RT-PCR system kit, EurobioPlex HDV assay, and RoboGene HDV RNA Quantification kit 2.0 were used for testing 151 HBsAg-positive samples, 90 HDV-RNA negative and 61 HDV-RNA positive. We also evaluated serial dilutions of the WHO international standard for HDV, PEI 7657/12. All HDV-RNA positive samples were genotyped using a next-generation sequencing strategy. Results: Qualitative results indicated a 100% concordance between tests. Quantitative results correlated well, r2 = 0.703 (Vircell-vs-Eurobio), r2 = 0.833 (Vircell-vs-RoboGene), r2 = 0.835 (Robogene-vs-Eurobio). Bias index was 2.083 (Vircell-vs-Eurobio), -1.283 (Vircell-vs-RoboGene), and -3.36 (Robogene-vs-Eurobio). Using the WHO IS, Vircell overestimated the viral load by 0.98 log IU/mL, Eurobio by 1.46 log IU/mL, and RoboGene underestimated it by 0.98 log IU/mL. Fifty-nine samples were successfully genotyped (Genotype 1, n=52; Genotype 5, n=7; Genotype 6, n=1), with similar results for correlation and bias. Conclusion: This study underscores the necessity of using reliable HDV-RNA detection and quantification assays, as evidenced by the high concordance rates in qualitative detection and the observed variability in quantitative results. These findings highlight the importance of consistent assay use in clinical practice to ensure accurate diagnosis and effective treatment monitoring of HDV infection.

Serological diagnosis of strongyloidiasis: An evaluation of three commercial assays.

BACKGROUND: Strongyloidiasis is caused by a neglected nematode, manifesting as chronic intestinal infection with potentially severe manifestations. The disease is an emerging problem in non-endemic countries affecting travelers and migrants. Diagnosis of strongyloidiasis is hampered by the lack of standardization and absence of a gold standard. Since adequate direct methods to detect the motile larvae in stool samples are not widely available, other techniques such as serology have been developed. METHODS: We evaluated three commercial ELISA kits (DRG Instruments, IVD Research, and Bordier Affinity Products) to detect IgG antibodies against Strongyloides stercoralis assays utilizing serum samples from travelers with microscopically confirmed strongyloidiasis (n = 50) and other imported helminthic infections (n = 159) as well as healthy controls (n = 50). RESULTS: The DRG, IVD, and Bordier assays showed sensitivities of 58.0%, 64.0%, and 56.0%, respectively. Specificity values were 96.0%, 96.0%, and 92.0% in healthy controls, and 67.3%, 62.9%, and 76.7% in cases with other helminth infections, respectively. Cross-reactions were mostly observed in cases with other nematodes (37.5%, 42.5%, and 20.0%, respectively), but also in trematode (33.3%, 38.1%, and 19.0%, respectively) and in cestode infections (25.0%, 30.0%, and 32.5%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates the diagnostic limitations of serological assays to detect or exclude cases of strongyloidiasis in returning travelers, who frequently present with recent or acute infections.

[Comparison of Cytomegalovirus Polymerase Chain Reaction Test Results Obtained with Fully Automated Systems: Roche Cobas 6800 and Qiagen NeuMoDx Experience]. / Tam Otomatize Sistemlerde Çalisilan Sitomegalovirüs Polimeraz Zincir Reaksiyonu Test Sonuçlarinin Karsilastirilmasi: Roche Cobas 6800 ile Qiagen NeuMoDx Deneyimi.

Viral load monitoring is important in identifying patients at risk of developing cytomegalovirus (CMV) related complications after transplantation and for this purpose, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (Rt-qPCR) tests are most commonly used. The main problem in CMV DNA Rt-qPCR tests that make quantitative measurements is that there are significant differences in measurements performed with different kits in different laboratories. Comparability of viral load measurements between laboratories has increased with the introduction of quantitative PCR tests calibrated with the CMV International Quantitation Standard (IQS) developed by the World Health Organization (WHO). However, quantitative agreement between measurements made with different kits has still not been fully achieved. In this study, it was aimed to investigate the quantitative compatibility between measurements made with Cobas 6800 (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) and NeuMoDx (Qiagen, Ann Arbor, USA) CMV DNA Rt-qPCR tests, which are fully automated new generation systems calibrated with the WHO CMV IQS. The results of 214 plasma samples, which were studied simultaneously with Cobas 6800 CMV Rt-qPCR and NeuMoDx CMV Rt-qPCR tests were analyzed. In the tests, the extraction, amplification and detection stages were carried out fully automatically. CMV DNA was detected in 144 (67.28%) samples in both tests and was not detected in 53 (24.76%) samples. Incompatible results were obtained in a total of 17 (7.94%) samples. Good agreement was found between the qualitative results of both tests (kappa= 0.80, p< 0.001). When the quantitative results (n= 129) obtained in the dynamic measurement range of both tests were examined, the median viral load values measured by Cobas 6800 CMV Rt-qPCR and NeuMoDx CMV Rt-qPCR tests were 513 IU/mL (range= 35-37000) and 741 IU/mL (range= 68-48978), respectively. According to the correlation analysis, a very strong correlation was found between the results of both tests (r= 0.94, p< 0.001). According to Bland-Altman analysis; the average difference between the results of the NeuMoDx CMV Rt-qPCR test and the Cobas 6800 CMV Rt-qPCR test was found to be -0.14 log10 [standard deviation (SD)= 0.23] IU/mL and it was determined that the Cobas 6800 CMV Rt-qPCR test had lower measurements than the NeuMoDx CMV Rt-qPCR test. In 120 of 129 samples (93%) whose results were within the dynamic measurement range of both tests, the measurement difference was within ± 0.5 log10 IU/mL and in 9 (7%), it was detected as more than ± 0.5 log10 (median 0.54 log10 IU/ml; range= 0.51-0.81). No measurement difference of more than ± 1.0 log10 was detected in any sample. In this study, quantitative agreement was found in the measurements made in plasma samples with the fully automated Cobas 6800 CMV Rt-qPCR and NeuMoDx CMV Rt-qPCR tests calibrated with the CMV IQS. To the best of our knowledge, a study comparing viral load measurements made with Cobas 6800 and NeuMoDx fully automated systems in the detection of CMV DNA has not yet been conducted, and this is the first study on this subject.

Comparative analysis of commercially available kits for optimal DNA extraction from bovine fecal samples.

In the field of metagenomic research, the choice of DNA extraction methods plays a pivotal yet often underestimated role in shaping the reliability and interpretability of microbial community data. This study delves into the impact of five commercially available DNA extraction kits on the analysis of bovine fecal microbiota. Recognizing the importance of accurate DNA extraction in elucidating microbial community dynamics, we systematically assessed DNA yield, quality, and microbial composition across these kits using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Notably, the FastDNA spin soil kit yielded the highest DNA concentration, while significant variations in quality were observed across kits. Furthermore, differential abundance analysis revealed kit-specific biases that impacted taxa representation. Microbial richness and diversity were significantly influenced by the choice of extraction kit, with QIAamp DNA stool minikit, QIAamp Power Pro, and DNeasy PowerSoil outperforming the Stool DNA Kit. Principal-coordinate analysis revealed distinct clustering based on DNA isolation procedures, particularly highlighting the unique microbial community composition derived from the Stool DNA Kit. This study also addressed practical implications, demonstrating how kit selection influences the concentration of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial taxa in samples. This research highlights the need for consideration of DNA extraction kits in metagenomic studies, offering valuable insights for researchers striving to advance the precision and depth of microbiota analyses in ruminants.

Evaluation of rapid diagnostic test kits for detection of Treponema pallidum antibody.

Rapid syphilis testing plays a crucial role in global health strategies, addressing the urgent need for prompt and accurate diagnostics, especially in settings with limited resources. Despite their practical utility, these tests often lack thorough validation, leading to concerns about their efficacy and reliability. This study aims to evaluate two prototypes of the Onsite Syphilis Ab Combo Rapid Test (Fd and Ff) and compare their performance with the established chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) method. Employing a reverse algorithm approach, the study analyzed 450 serum samples, including those from syphilis patients, healthy individuals, and cases with potential cross-reactions. Results of the rapid test kit were then correlated with CMIA findings, RPR, and TPPA titers. The results showed that prototype Fd exhibited a sensitivity of 100.0%, specificity of 98.8%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 8.4%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 100.00% and accuracy of 98.8%. Similarly, prototype Ff exhibited sensitivity of 100.0%, but with a slightly higher specificity of 99.6%, PPV of 21.5%, NPV of 100.0% and accuracy of 99.6%. Moreover, both prototypes Fd and Ff of the Onsite Syphilis Ab Combo Rapid Test demonstrated significant efficacy diagnostic tool, offering clear and straightforward interpretation for clinicians in varied CMIA, RPR and TPPA titer scenarios. The Onsite Syphilis Ab Combo Rapid Test prototypes, Fd and Ff, demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, comparable to CMIA methods. The effectiveness highlights their suitability for syphilis screening, particularly in non-laboratory settings or situations requiring immediate results. The validation of these prototypes supports their integration into current syphilis diagnostic algorithms, potentially contributing to improved public health outcomes.

How to verify the analytical and clinical performance of ELISA immunoanalysis in the real laboratory practice. PCSK9 as an example.

BACKGROUND: Manufacturers and diagnostic companies often recommend on-site verification of analytical performance in the clinical laboratory. The validation process used by manufacturers is rarely described in detail, and certain information on analytical performance is missing from the product sheet, especially for immunoanalytical methods. We describe an approach to the detailed validation of an ELISA method for the measurement of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) plasma concentrations. We compared manufacturers' claims of analytical performance with data obtained in the field laboratory using several approaches. METHODS: We used the Human Proprotein Convertase 9/PCSK9 Quantikine ELISA diagnostic kit (R&D systems, Bio-Techne Ltd., Abingdon Science Park, Abingdon, UK) and three levels of quality control solution Quantikine Immunoassay Control Group 235 (R&D systems, Bio-Techne Ltd., Abingdon Science Park, Abingdon, UK) to verify precision. We measured the concentration of PCSK9 using the DS2 ELISA Reader (Dynex Technologies GmbH, Denkendorf, Germany). We used analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the R statistical package (R core team, version 1.4.5). Statistical analysis and terminology were performed according to protocol CLSI EP15-A3, and the reference interval was checked according to CLSI/IFCC C28-A3c. RESULTS: We found a significant difference between the manufacturer's claims of analytical performance and real data measured in the routine clinical laboratory. The calculated CV (%) for repeatability (calculated by simple estimation of the mean and SD, as used by the manufacturer) was between 5.5% and 7.4%, but the manufacturer's claim was between 4.1% and 6.5%. Using ANOVA, the true repeatability was between 5.0% and 6.9%. Similarly, ANOVA revealed values of CV (%) for within-laboratory imprecision between 6.5% and 9.1%, while the manufacturer's claims were between 4.1% and 5.9%. The recovery ranged from 105.5% to 121.8%. The manufacturer's recommended reference interval was checked and we didn't find any significant difference between men and women. CONCLUSIONS: We describe a comprehensive approach to verify the analytical performance of an ELISA method using the measurement of PCSK9 plasma concentration as an example. We found differences between the results of this approach based on the CLSI EP15-A3 protocol and data provided by the manufacturer. We recommend the verification of analytical performance by more complex statistical tools in laboratory practice.

Comparison of the NeuMoDx™ HBV quant assay and artus QS-RGQ® kit for HBV DNA quantitation in plasma samples.

We aimed to compare the NeuMoDx HBV Assay with the artus HBV Assay using residual plasma samples and to evaluate the discordant results. The study included 200 patient samples analyzed with the NMD assay and stored at -80 °C. Samples were analyzed by artus in 2023. Discordant results were evaluated by cobas 6800 HBV DNA Test. Excellent agreement was found between both tests. Of the 100 samples that were HBV DNA negative by NMD, 93 were negative and 7 were positive by artus. With the Cobas test, 5 samples were positive. Of the100 HBV DNA positive samples detected by NMD, 99 were positive with the artus assay. This sample was also HBV DNA negative by the Cobas test. The sensitivity and specificity of NeuMoDx were found 93 % and 99 %, respectively. There was excellent qualitative agreement and strong quantitative correlation between the NeuMoDx and artus assays for HBV DNA detection and quantitation.

Performance evaluation of a newly developed 2019-nCoV nucleic acid detection kit based on Ion Proton sequencing platform and its comparison with the MGI Tech (DNBSEQ-G99) platform.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of a newly developed 2019-nCoV nucleic acid detection kit based on Ion Proton sequencing platform and make comparation with MGI Tech (DNBSEQ-G99) platform. METHODS: References and clinical samples were used to evaluate the precision, agreement rate, limit of detection (LOD), anti-interference ability and analytical specificity. Twenty-seven clinical specimens were used to make comparison between two platforms. RESULTS: The kit showed good intra-assay, inter-assay, inter-day precision between different operators and laboratories, fine agreement rate with references, a relatively low LOD of 1 × 103 copies/ml, anti-interference capability of 5 % whole blood and 1mg/ml mucin and no cross reaction with twenty-nine common clinical pathogens. Consistency of variant classification was observed between two platforms. The WGS from Ion Proton tended to have higher coverage and less missing data. CONCLUSIONS: The newly developed kit has shown satisfactory performances and excellent consistency with DNBSEQ-G99, making it a good alternative choice clinically.

[Six Sigma driven QC management in hepatitis C serology]. / La méthodologie six sigma dans la gestion des contrôles de qualité en sérologie de l'hépatite C.

The Westgard quality control (QC) rules are often applied in infectious diseases serology to validate the quality of results, but this requires a reasonable tradeoff between maximum sensitivity to errors and minimum false rejections. This article, in addition to illustrate the six sigma methodology in the QC management of the (anti-HCV Architect®) test, it discusses the main influencing factors on sigma value. Data from low positive and in-kit control materials spreading over 6 months and using four reagent kits, were used to calculate the precision of the test. The difference between the control material reactivity and the cut-off defined the error budget. Sigma values were > 6, which indicates that the method produces four erroneous results per million tests. The application of the six sigma concept made it possible to argue the choice of the new QC strategy (use of 13S rule with one positive control) and to relax the existing QC rules. This work provides a framework for infectious diseases serology laboratories to evaluate tests performances against a quality requirement and design an optimal QC strategy.

Diagnostic performance of the bioline dengue duo rapid test on symptomatic patients assisted at Armed Forces Hospital (Hfa) in Brasília, Brazil.

Dengue necessitates accurate diagnosis. Rapid tests such as Bioline™ DENGUE DUO have gained traction, but validation in specific populations is essential. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the Bioline™ test, alongside assessing the socio-epidemiological profile of symptomatic patients in a Brasília Military Hospital. The serum of 404 symptomatic patients was analyzed by the Bioline™ DENGUE DUO test, followed by Dengue virus detection and discrimination of the four serotypes by RT-qPCR. Accuracy was assessed using parameters including sensitivity (S), specificity (E), positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV), and positive (RV +) and negative (RV-) likelihood ratios. The NS1 component exhibited a sensitivity of 70.37%, a specificity of 97.30%, and an overall efficiency of 90.10% when compared to RT-qPCR as the gold standard. The IgM component demonstrated a sensitivity of 26.85%, a specificity of 89.53%, and an overall efficiency of 72.77% when compared to RT-qPCR as the gold standard. The IgG component demonstrated a sensitivity of 23.15%, a specificity of 68.92%, and an overall efficiency of 56.68% when compared to RT-qPCR as the gold standard. Several rapid tests are commercially available. However, considering variations across regions and demographic groups, it is important to question their accuracy in specific populations. Rapid tests are important screening tools, but they can have limitations for the certainty of diagnosis. Bioline™ DENGUE DUO displayed good specificity, but sensitivity was slightly below optimal levels. While helpful for confirming dengue, improvements are needed to effectively rule out the disease.

Analytical and clinical evaluation of the cobas Epstein-Barr virus test at a tertiary care cancer hospital.

BACKGROUND: Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) viral loads in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients are typically monitored using quantitative molecular assays. The Cobas EBV test (Roche Molecular, Pleasanton, CA) has recently been FDA-cleared for the monitoring of EBV viral loads in plasma samples of transplant patients. In this study, we compared the viral loads obtained by a laboratory-developed test (EBV LDT) using Altona Analyte specific reagents (ASR) to those obtained on the Cobas EBV test. METHODS: The analytical performance of the assay was established using the EBV verification panel from Exact Diagnostics and the EBV ATCC strain B95-8. The clinical evaluation was performed using 343 plasma samples initially tested on the EBV LDT. RESULTS: The analytical sensitivity (<18.8 IU/mL), precision (SD < 0.17 log) and linear range (35.0 IU/mL to 1E + 08 IU/mL) of the Cobas EBV assay established by the manufacturers were confirmed. The strength of the qualitative agreement was substantial between the cobas EBV and the EBV LDT (85.6 %; κ = 0.71) and almost perfect when discordant results were resolved (96.4 %; κ = 0.93). The quantitative agreement was moderate (82.9 %; κ = 0.53) with the viral load obtained on the Cobas EBV test being lower across the linear range of the two tests (mean log difference of 1.0). While the absolute values of the viral loads were markedly different, the overall trends observed in patients with multiple consecutive results were similar between the two tests. CONCLUSIONS: The Cobas EBV test provides an accurate and valid, in vitro diagnostic (IVD) option for monitoring of EBV viral loads in transplant patients and should provide an opportunity for increased standardization and commutability of tests results across laboratories.

Comparison of diagnostic performance among Abbott RealTime HCV Genotyping II, Abbott HCV Genotype plus RUO, and Roche Cobas HCV Genotyping assays for hepatitis C virus genotyping.

Comparison of diagnostic accuracy for commercial hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotyping (Abbott RealTime HCV Genotyping II, Roche Cobas Genotyping) and investigational Abbott HCV Genotype plus RUO assays designed to discriminate genotype (GT)-1a, 1b or 6 in cases of ambiguous GT from the Abbott commercial assay remains limited. 743 HCV-viremic samples were subjected to analysis using Abbott and Roche commercial as well as Abbott HCV Genotype plus RUO assays. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) targeting core region was employed as the reference standard. Diagnostic accuracy was reported as the number of participants (percentages) along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Using NGS, 741 samples (99.7%) yielded valid genotyping results. The diagnostic accuracies were 97.6% (95% CI: 96.1%-98.5%) and 95.3% (95% CI: 93.4%-96.6%) using Abbott and Roche commercial assays (p = 0.0174). Abbott commercial assay accurately diagnosed HCV GT-6a and 6w, whereas Roche commercial assay accurately diagnosed HCV GT-6a. Both assays demonstrated low accuracies for HCV GT-6b, 6e, 6g, and 6n. Abbott HCV Genotype plus RUO assay discriminated 13 of the 14 samples (92.9%; 95% CI: 64.2%-99.6%) that yielded ambiguous GT. Both assays were capable of diagnosing mixed HCV infections when the minor genotype comprised >8.4% of the viral load. The diagnostic performance of commercial HCV genotyping assays is commendable. Abbott assay demonstrated superior performance compared to Roche assay in diagnosing HCV GT-6. Abbott HCV Genotype plus RUO assay aids in discriminating ambiguous GT. Both commercial assays are proficient in diagnosing mixed HCV infections at a cut-off viral load of 8.4% in minor genotype.

Development and evaluation of a lyophilization protocol for colorimetric RT-LAMP diagnostic assay for COVID-19.

Molecular diagnostics involving nucleic acids (DNA and RNA) are regarded as extremely functional tools. During the 2020 global health crisis, efforts intensified to optimize the production and delivery of molecular diagnostic kits for detecting SARS-CoV-2. During this period, RT-LAMP emerged as a significant focus. However, the thermolability of the reagents used in this technique necessitates special low-temperature infrastructure for transport, storage, and conservation. These requirements limit distribution capacity and necessitate cost-increasing adaptations. Consequently, this report details the development of a lyophilization protocol for reagents in a colorimetric RT-LAMP diagnostic kit to detect SARS-CoV-2, facilitating room-temperature transport and storage. We conducted tests to identify the ideal excipients that maintain the molecular integrity of the reagents and ensure their stability during room-temperature storage and transport. The optimal condition identified involved adding 5% PEG 8000 and 75 mM trehalose to the RT-LAMP reaction, which enabled stability at room temperature for up to 28 days and yielded an analytical and diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 83.33% and 90%, respectively, for detecting SARS-CoV-2. This study presents the results of a lyophilized colorimetric RT-LAMP COVID-19 detection assay with diagnostic sensitivity and specificity comparable to RT-qPCR, particularly in samples with high viral load.

Evaluation of the ELITe InGenius and Bordetella ELITe MGB Kit for the detection and identification of B. pertussis, B. parapertussis and B. holmesii.

Bordetella pertussis is the causative pathogen of whooping cough or pertussis, a contagious respiratory disease. Aside from serodiagnosis, laboratory confirmation of pertussis is done through PCR, as B. pertussis is difficult to culture. The ELITe InGenius instrument (ELITechGroup, France) with accompanying Bordetella ELITe MGB Kit was evaluated against a laboratory-developed assay. Both assays combine two screening (IS481, IS1001) and two confirmation targets (recA, ptxA-Pr or IS1002) for optimal sensitivity and specificity. The company's stated claims on sensitivity and reproducibility were confirmed. Accuracy testing showed full concordance between both assays for the screening targets. Minor discrepancies were seen for the B. pertussis confirmation target. Some cross-reactivity with other Bordetella species was observed for the IS481-target, however, none of these were confirmed in the ptxA-Pr target. These results show the suitability of the Bordetella ELITe MGB Kit for the detection and differentiation of B. pertussis, B. parapertussis and B. holmesii.

Comparative evaluation of the diagnostic accuracies of four different malaria rapid diagnostic test kits available in Ghana.

Malaria rapid diagnostic test (mRDT) kit is one of the techniques for diagnosing malaria. Due to its inherent advantages over the microscopy technique, several brands of the kit have flooded malaria endemic countries, without prior in-country evaluation. Two of such mRDT kits are Oscar (India) and Standard Q (Korea Republic). In this study, the performance of Oscar and Standard Q mRDT kits were compared to First Response (India) and CareStart (USA) mRDTs, which have been evaluated and deployed for use approved by the Ministry of Health (MOH). In this comparative study, whole blood samples were collected from patients suspected of malaria. Plasmodium falciparum was detected in each sample using nested polymerase chain reaction (nPCR), microscopy and the four mRDTs. The sensitivities, specificities, accuracies, positive and negative predictive values and accuracies of the mRDTs were determined using nPCR as a reference technique. Kappa statistic was used to determine the level of agreement among the techniques. Two hundred (200) blood samples were analyzed in this study. The overall detection rates of P. falciparum by microscopy, First Response, CareStart, Oscar-PfHRP2, Standard Q mRDT kits and nPCR were 31.5%, 34.5%, 33.5%, 32%, 31% and 43% (x2 = 6.1, p = 0.046), respectively. The accuracies of CareStart and First Response were comparable (90.5% vs. 89.5%). Further, comparing their sensitivities, Oscar-PfHRP2 was 74.4% (95% confidence interval (CI): 63.9-83.2) while that of Standard Q was 72.1% (95% CI: 61.4-81.2), with comparable accuracies (Oscar-PfHRP2-89% and Standard Q -88%). Apart from First Response that was 98.3% specific, the others were 100% specific. Kappa test revealed perfect diagnostic agreement (κ = 0.90-0.98) among the four mRDTs. That notwithstanding, Oscar-PfHRP2 agreed better with CareStart (κ = 0.94) and First Response (κ = 0.92) compared to the agreement between Standard Q and, CareStart (κ = 0.92) and First Response (κ = 0.90). Taken together, the diagnostic performance of the four mRDT kits were statistically similar. That notwithstanding, new mRDT kits should be evaluated prior to deployment for use.

Performance of the Applied Biosystems HIV-1 Genotyping Kit with Integrase.

HIV genotyping is used to assess HIV susceptibility to antiretroviral drugs. The Applied Biosystems HIV-1 Genotyping Kit with Integrase (AB kit, Thermo Fisher Scientific) detects resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) in HIV protease (PR), reverse transcriptase (RT), and integrase (IN). We compared results from the AB kit with results obtained previously with the ViroSeq HIV-1 Genotyping System. DNA amplicons from the AB kit were also analyzed using next-generation sequencing (NGS). HIV RNA was extracted using the MagNA Pure 24 instrument (Roche Diagnostics; 96 plasma samples, HIV subtype B, viral load range: 530-737,741 copies/mL). FASTA files were generated from AB kit data using Exatype (Hyrax Biosciences). DNA amplicons from the AB kit were also analyzed by NGS using the Nextera XT kit (Illumina). Drug resistance was predicted using the Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database. The mean genetic distance for sequences from ViroSeq and the AB kit was 0.02% for PR/RT and 0.04% for IN; 103 major RAMs were detected by both methods. Four additional major RAMs were detected by the AB kit only. These four major RAMs were also detected by NGS (detected in 18.1%-38.2% of NGS reads). NGS detected 27 major RAMs that were not detected with either of the Sanger sequencing-based kits. All major RAMs detected with ViroSeq were detected with the AB kit; additional RAMs were detected with the AB kit only. DNA amplicons from the AB kit can be used for NGS for more sensitive detection of RAMs.

Comparison of Fecal MicroRNA Isolation Using Various Total RNA Isolation Kits.

Fecal specimens have long been regarded as promising sources for gastrointestinal cancer screening and have, thus, been extensively investigated in biomarker research. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small, non-coding RNA molecules involved in regulating various biological processes. They are commonly dysregulated during tumor development and exhibit differential expression in feces. To assess the preanalytical feasibility of fecal miRNA analysis, we systematically compared the performance of commonly used total RNA extraction methods. Fecal samples from healthy subjects were utilized for this evaluation. Various methods, including miRNeasy, Universal, Trizol, RNeasy, and mirVana kits, were employed to isolate total RNA. MiRNA expression analyses were conducted using TaqMan or SYBR Green qRT-PCR for a subset of miRNAs, with externally spiked-in cel-miR-39 used for normalization. Most methods demonstrated similar performance in terms of the total RNA concentration and purity. Externally spiked cel-miR-39 and endogenous miRNAs (RNU6b, miR-16, and miR-21) exhibited comparable concentrations across the different RNA isolation methods, whereas the RNeasy mini kit consistently yielded lower values. Our findings suggest that various isolation methods produce reproducible and comparable miRNA expression results, supporting the potential comparability and translational applicability of miRNA-based biomarker research in the future.

Real-world performance of the NeuMoDx™ HCV Quant Test for quantification of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA.

Quantification of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA in serum or plasma samples is an essential parameter in HCV diagnostics. Here, the NeuMoDx™Molecular System (Qiagen) was tested for the most common HCV genotypes and compared to the cobas c6800 system (Roche). HCV-RNA from 131 plasma/serum samples from chronically infected patients was determined in parallel on the NeuMoDx and c6800 systems. Linearity was analysed using the four most common HCV genotypes (1-4) in our cohort. The coefficient of variation (CV) within (intra-assay) and between (inter-assay) runs was calculated based on HCV-RNA concentration. Quantitative HCV-RNA results were highly correlated on both test systems (R2 = 0.7947; y = 0.94 x + 0.37). On average, the NeuMoDx and c6800 HCV RNA levels showed a mean difference of only 0.05 log10 IU/mL but with a broad distribution (±1.2 2 x SD). The NeuMoDx demonstrated very good linearity across all HCV genotypes tested at concentrations between 1.7 and 6.2 log10 IU/mL (R2 range: 0.9257-0.9991) with the highest mean coefficient of determination for genotype 1 (R2 = 0.9909). The mean intra- and inter-assay CV for both serum and plasma samples was <5 %. The NeuMoDx HCV-RNA Assay demonstrates high subtype-independent comparability, linearity, and reproducibility for the quantification of HCV-RNA in serum and plasma samples from chronically infected patients.

Evaluation of the SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection reagent LAMPdirect Genelyzer KIT using nasopharyngeal swab and saliva samples.

The LAMPdirect Genelyzer KIT allows for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in saliva samples with a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) method and generates results within 20 min. It has been approved by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency in Japan. In this study, the performance of the LAMPdirect Genelyzer KIT was compared with that of the RT-qPCR reference method using 50 nasopharyngeal swabs and 100 saliva samples. In addition, we evaluated the applicability of an alternative reverse transcriptase and the effects of an inactivation buffer. The total agreement rates were 80.0 % and 82.0 % for nasopharyngeal and saliva samples, respectively. When considering samples at the detection limit (50 copies/reaction) that increases the chance of transmission between humans, the total agreement rates were 100% and 94.1% for nasopharyngeal and saliva samples, respectively. The LAMP method is simple, fast, and inexpensive, making it useful for small medical institutions or rural areas.

Performance Assessment of Treponemal and Nontreponemal Tests for the Diagnosis of Acquired Syphilis.

There are a variety of nontreponemal test (NTT) and treponemal test (TT) kits for the serologic diagnosis of syphilis. Because of the complexity of the infection (multiple clinical stages) and the different antigens used in these kits, a systematic evaluation of the accuracy of the currently available commercial tests is warranted. Our objective was to evaluate the performance of commercially available tests for the diagnosis of syphilis infection. In this study, we analyzed one NTT (Venereal Disease Research Laboratory [VDRL] test, Wiener Laboratories, Rosario, Argentina) and two TTs (fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption [FTA-ABS] test, Euroimmun, Lübeck, Germany, and syphilis recombinant ELISA v. 4.0 test [ELISA], Wiener Laboratories, Rosario, Argentina) using a panel of 187 samples, including serum samples from 31 individuals with primary syphilis, 77 with secondary syphilis, and 79 with latent syphilis. An additional 192 samples from uninfected individuals and 323 serum samples from individuals with other diseases were included. The sensitivities of the VDRL, ELISA, and FTA-ABS tests were 97.9%, 100%, and 96.3%, respectively. The VDRL and ELISA tests showed a specificity of 100%, and the FTA-ABS test showed a specificity of 99.5%. Accuracy was 98.9% for the VDRL test, 100% for the ELISA, and 97.9% for the FTA-ABS test. For primary, secondary, and latent syphilis, the ELISA achieved a diagnostic performance of 100%, whereas the sensitivity for the VDRL and FTA-ABS tests ranged from 96.8% to 98.7% and 93.7% to 98.7%, respectively. No difference was observed when the tests were used as traditional or reverse algorithms. In general, all three tests are able to discriminate positive and negative samples for syphilis, regardless of the diagnostic algorithm.