Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 78
Filter
1.
Int Braz J Urol ; 50(6): 785-786, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39133791

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Minimally invasive radical nephrectomy is often preferred for larger renal tumours not suitable for partial nephrectomy (1). When performed with a multiport robot, the procedure is routinely performed with a transperitoneal approach, with recent studies highlighting important factors for surgical outcomes, including predictive factors (2), segmental artery unclamping techniques (3), and comparisons of robotic techniques (4). This video shows that SP Robot-Assisted Radical Nephrectomy (RARN) via a lower anterior approach is valuable in challenging cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed SP-RARN on two complex patients using a retroperitoneal lower anterior approach. The first patient, a 54-year-old female with a BMI of 36.8 kg/m², had a ventral hernia and bowel obstruction history, with a 9 cm right middle kidney mass. The second patient, a 58-year-old male with a BMI of 31.19 kg/m², had ESRD and was on peritoneal dialysis for 8 years, with a 3.4x3.7 cm mass in the right superior pole, suspected to be RCC. The surgical technique is detailed in the video. RESULTS: Both procedures were successful, with operative times of 173 and 203 minutes and blood loss of 150 mL. No complications occurred. Patients were discharged after 31 and 38 hours, respectively. Histopathology confirmed RCC. At the 3-month follow-up, no complications or readmissions were reported. Second patient continued peritoneal dialysis without issues. CONCLUSION: Retroperitoneal SP-RARN via the lower anterior approach avoids the peritoneal cavity, making it suitable for certain patients. In these patients, more so than in others, this procedure is feasible, safe, and less morbid than the standard multiport approach.


Subject(s)
Kidney Neoplasms , Nephrectomy , Operative Time , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Humans , Nephrectomy/methods , Middle Aged , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Female , Male , Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Retroperitoneal Space/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/surgery , Feasibility Studies , Reproducibility of Results
2.
JBRA Assist Reprod ; 28(3): 497-502, 2024 Aug 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38838161

ABSTRACT

Ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation (OTCT) has emerged in recent years as a potential method for reversing abnormal endocrine and reproductive functions, particularly in patients receiving gonadotoxic cancer treatments having longer survival rates. From its first rodent experiments to human trials, OTCT has evolved tremendously, opening new windows for further utilization. Since then, significant progress has been achieved in terms of techniques used for surgical removal of the tissue, optimal fragment size, freezing and thawing procedures, and appropriate surgical sites for the subsequent reimplementation of the graft. In addition, various approaches have been proposed to decrease the risk of ischemic injury, which is the leading cause of significant follicle loss during neo-angiogenesis. This review aims to discuss the pros and cons of ovarian and retroperitoneal transplantation sites, highlighting the justifications for the viability and efficacy of different transplantation sites as well as the potential advantages and drawbacks of retroperitoneal or preperitoneal area.


Subject(s)
Cryopreservation , Fertility Preservation , Ovary , Humans , Female , Ovary/transplantation , Cryopreservation/methods , Fertility Preservation/methods , Retroperitoneal Space/surgery
3.
Int Braz J Urol ; 49(2): 269-270, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36037258

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (RPLND) is well established as a primary treatment, especially for high-risk stage I and stage IIA/B nonseminomatous tumors, but its value in seminomatous tumors is underreported (1). Classically, seminomas with isolated retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy are treated with external beam radiation therapy or systemic chemotherapy. Although these modalities are effective, they are associated with significant long-term morbidity (2, 3). Some retrospective studies have demonstrated the potential of RPLND as a first-line treatment for stage IIa seminoma, and two very recent prospective trials, still with interim results: SEMS TRIAL and PRIMETEST(3-7). The RPLND robotic technique has been previously described in the post-chemotherapy scenario, however, surgical videos of primary laparoscopic approach are lacking, especially in seminomatous disease (8). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We present two cases of primary videolaparoscopic RPLND, using different approaches. Case 1: Thirty four years-old, with prior right orchiectomy for mixed tumor. After 8 months he presented an two cm enlarged interaortocaval lymph node. Percutaneous biopsy showed pure seminoma metastasis. Case 2: Thirty three years-old, with previous left orchiectomy for stage I pure seminoma, without risk factors. After nine months, the patient had a three cm enlarged para-aortic lymph node. RESULTS: The surgical time ranged from 150 to 210 minutes, with a maximum bleeding of 300 mL and hospital discharge in 48 hours. In one of the cases, we identified a significant desmoplastic reaction, with firm adhesions to the great vessels, requiring vascular sutures, however, no major complication occurred. Pathological anatomy confirmed pure seminoma lymph node metastases in both cases. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic primary RPLND proved to be technically feasible, with less postoperative pain and early hospital discharge. We understand that more studies should be performed to confirm our oncological results.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Seminoma , Testicular Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Adult , Seminoma/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Feasibility Studies , Testicular Neoplasms/pathology , Retroperitoneal Space/surgery , Lymph Node Excision/methods , Laparoscopy/methods , Biopsy , Neoplasm Staging
4.
JBJS Case Connect ; 12(1)2022 03 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35294409

ABSTRACT

CASE: The modified direct anterior approach (MDAA) is a recently popular surgical technique for total hip arthroplasty (THA), with well-documented challenges. Characterized as acute hip and back pain, we present the case of a 78-year-old woman who developed an iliopsoas hematoma after an MDAA THA and discuss the management of this incident. CONCLUSIONS: Iliopsoas hematoma after THA poses a unique challenge and should be considered in patients with acute hip and back pain, with loss of strength on the affected limb after an MDAA THA.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Aged , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Female , Hematoma/diagnostic imaging , Hematoma/etiology , Hematoma/surgery , Hip/surgery , Humans , Retroperitoneal Space/surgery , Thigh/surgery
5.
Eur J Radiol ; 145: 110042, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34801877

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the effectiveness of a new technique of hydrodissection for peritoneal structures displacement during preoperative localization markers placement. We retrospectively reviewed two cases of percutaneous fiducial marker placement prior rescue retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. In both cases pressurized 5% dextrose in water (D5W) was used to hydrodissect the peritoneal space and securely reach the lymph nodes. Two patients were submitted to water jet technique for transperitoneal trespassing to reach the retroperitoneum. The volume of fluid used to navigate was 125-200 mL and the mean time to cross the peritoneum was 6 min 47 s (ranging from 3″26' to 10″24'). In conclusion, Bowel and small vessels displacement using pressurized D5W is a safe method to reach retroperitoneal space during percutaneous procedures.


Subject(s)
Peritoneum , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Humans , Peritoneum/diagnostic imaging , Peritoneum/surgery , Retroperitoneal Space/diagnostic imaging , Retroperitoneal Space/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Water
6.
Cir Cir ; 89(5): 669-673, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34665183

ABSTRACT

Anterior cage migration is the most infrequent and dangerous complication seen in posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) procedures. We report the case of a 74-year-old woman who underwent PLIF at the L5-S1 level. During the surgery, one of the PLIF-cages dislodged anteriorly into the abdominal cavity without vascular injury. An anterior retroperitoneal approach to remove the cage and complete the fusion was made. The patient was discharged 2 weeks later with encouraging clinical results. In a patient hemodynamically stable, removing the cage by a vascular surgeon, and complete the Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion could be a feasible option at L5-S1.


La migración anterior del implante para fusión lumbar es la complicación más infrecuente y peligrosa asociada a la fusión intersomática posterior (PLIF). Reportamos el caso de un paciente femenino de 74 años, operada de PLIF en L5-S1. Durante la cirugía, una de las cajas usadas migró a la cavidad abdominal, sin ocasionar lesión vascular. Para remover el implante y completar la fusión lumbar un abordaje retroperitoneal anterior fue realizado. La paciente fue egresada 2 semanas después con éxito. En un paciente hemodinamicamente estable, este abordaje puede ser una opción para revertir la complicación y completar la fusión lumbar vía anterior.


Subject(s)
Lumbar Vertebrae , Spinal Fusion , Aged , Female , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Lumbosacral Region , Retroperitoneal Space/surgery , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
8.
Int Braz J Urol ; 46(4): 538-544, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32213211

ABSTRACT

The indication for simultaneous bilateral native nephrectomy and the choice of surgical technique is of key importance, as these patients are burdened with a large comorbidity. The paper reports our experience of seven successful and completed simultaneous bilateral native nephrectomy procedures with retroperitoneal approach in the patient's flank position. Seven patients (mean age 34), were indicated for the removal of both kidneys before the planned transplant. Six patients underwent haemodialysis from 48 to 84 months, and one underwent peritoneal dialysis for 60 months. Two patients had undergone graftectomy. The indications were chronic infection or hypertension. The length of the kidneys ranged from 5.8 to 10cm. All procedures were performed by the laparoscopic technique with retroperitoneal approach, with the patient in the flank position. Three trocars were used on each side. The retroperitoneal space created did not require balloon dilatation. The kidneys were removed through the 10mm trocar hole after splitting. The duration of the procedure ranged from 150 to 240 minutes, average 139 minutes and blood loss ranged from100 to 250mL, average 142mL. There were no complications. In 6 patients, the postoperative dialysis was performed at zero-day. One patient continued peritoneal dialysis. Patients were discharged on the 2nd day, except one with peritoneal dialysis, who was discharged on the 3rd day. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic bilateral native nephrectomy is a safe and effective technique, and it can be considered as an ideal approach for native nephrectomy. It allows for the preservation of peritoneal integrity and vessels for future vascular access.


Subject(s)
Nephrectomy , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Kidney Transplantation , Laparoscopy , Male , Peritoneal Dialysis , Retroperitoneal Space/surgery
9.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 46(4): 538-544, 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1134207

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT The indication for simultaneous bilateral native nephrectomy and the choice of surgical technique is of key importance, as these patients are burdened with a large comorbidity. The paper reports our experience of seven successful and completed simultaneous bilateral native nephrectomy procedures with retroperitoneal approach in the patient's flank position. Seven patients (mean age 34), were indicated for the removal of both kidneys before the planned transplant. Six patients underwent haemodialysis from 48 to 84 months, and one underwent peritoneal dialysis for 60 months. Two patients had undergone graftectomy. The indications were chronic infection or hypertension. The length of the kidneys ranged from 5.8 to 10cm. All procedures were performed by the laparoscopic technique with retroperitoneal approach, with the patient in the flank position. Three trocars were used on each side. The retroperitoneal space created did not require balloon dilatation. The kidneys were removed through the 10mm trocar hole after splitting. The duration of the procedure ranged from 150 to 240 minutes, average 139 minutes and blood loss ranged from100 to 250mL, average 142mL. There were no complications. In 6 patients, the postoperative dialysis was performed at zero-day. One patient continued peritoneal dialysis. Patients were discharged on the 2nd day, except one with peritoneal dialysis, who was discharged on the 3rd day. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic bilateral native nephrectomy is a safe and effective technique, and it can be considered as an ideal approach for native nephrectomy. It allows for the preservation of peritoneal integrity and vessels for future vascular access.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Aged , Nephrectomy , Retroperitoneal Space/surgery , Kidney Transplantation , Peritoneal Dialysis , Laparoscopy
10.
Int Braz J Urol ; 45(6): 1144-1152, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31808402

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic retroperitoneal simple nephrectomy (LRSN) has been widely accepted as a mainstay option for benign non-functioning kidney. The complexity of the procedure, however, differs and remains a subject of controversy. OBJECTIVE: To develop a standardised Harbin Medical University nephrectomy score (HMUNS) system for evaluating LRSN complexity. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 6 variables with different factors comprising primary diseases, history of upper urinary tract surgery, body mass index (BMI), surgeon's learning curve, kidney volume, and Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) scores were included in the HMUN score. 95 consecutive patients who underwent LRSN at our institution were divided into low (2 to 6 points) and high (7 to 17 points) complexity groups with HMUNS and investigated the differences of operative time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), postoperative hospitalisation time (PHT), rate of intraoperative conversion to open surgery, and the Clavien-Dindo classifi cation (CDC) between both groups. RESULTS: Longer mean operative times (193.2±69.3 min vs. 151.9±46.3 min, p <0.05), more median estimated blood loss (100.0mL vs. 50.0mL, p <0.05), and higher rates of conversion to open surgery (1.2% vs. 25%, p <0.05) were observed in the high-complexity group (n=12) than in the low-complexity group (n=83). However, there were no remarkable differences between the two groups related to the baseline characteristics, post-surgical hospitalisation times, and postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: The HMUNS can effectively reflect LRSN complexity, thus providing a quantitative system for risk estimation and treatment decisions. Because of some limitations, further well-designed studies are necessary to confirm our fi ndings. Patient summary: The HMUNS, including primary diseases, history of upper urinary tract surgery, BMI, surgeon's learning curve, kidney volume, and MAP score, can provide an effective quantitative tool to evaluate the complexity of LRSN.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy/methods , Nephrectomy/methods , Risk Assessment/methods , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Laparoscopy/standards , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Nephrectomy/standards , Operative Time , Postoperative Complications , Reference Values , Reproducibility of Results , Retroperitoneal Space/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Statistics, Nonparametric
11.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 45(6): 1144-1152, Nov.-Dec. 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1056343

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Background: Laparoscopic retroperitoneal simple nephrectomy (LRSN) has been widely accepted as a mainstay option for benign non-functioning kidney. The complexity of the procedure, however, differs and remains a subject of controversy. Objective: To develop a standardised Harbin Medical University nephrectomy score (HMUNS) system for evaluating LRSN complexity. Subjects and methods: A total of 6 variables with different factors comprising primary diseases, history of upper urinary tract surgery, body mass index (BMI), surgeon's learning curve, kidney volume, and Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) scores were included in the HMUN score. 95 consecutive patients who underwent LRSN at our institution were divided into low (2 to 6 points) and high (7 to 17 points) complexity groups with HMUNS and investigated the differences of operative time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), postoperative hospitalisation time (PHT), rate of intraoperative conversion to open surgery, and the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) between both groups. Results: Longer mean operative times (193.2±69.3 min vs. 151.9±46.3 min, p <0.05), more median estimated blood loss (100.0mL vs. 50.0mL, p <0.05), and higher rates of conversion to open surgery (1.2% vs. 25%, p <0.05) were observed in the high-complexity group (n=12) than in the low-complexity group (n=83). However, there were no remarkable differences between the two groups related to the baseline characteristics, post-surgical hospitalisation times, and postoperative complications. Conclusions: The HMUNS can effectively reflect LRSN complexity, thus providing a quantitative system for risk estimation and treatment decisions. Because of some limitations, further well-designed studies are necessary to confirm our findings. Patient summary: The HMUNS, including primary diseases, history of upper urinary tract surgery, BMI, surgeon's learning curve, kidney volume, and MAP score, can provide an effective quantitative tool to evaluate the complexity of LRSN.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Aged , Laparoscopy/methods , Risk Assessment/methods , Nephrectomy/methods , Postoperative Complications , Reference Values , Retroperitoneal Space/surgery , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Laparoscopy/standards , Statistics, Nonparametric , Operative Time , Length of Stay , Middle Aged , Nephrectomy/standards
12.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) ; 65(5): 578-585, 2019 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31166429

ABSTRACT

The Guidelines Project, an initiative of the Brazilian Medical Association, aims to combine information from the medical field in order to standardize producers to assist the reasoning and decision-making of doctors. The information provided through this project must be assessed and criticized by the physician responsible for the conduct that will be adopted, depending on the conditions and the clinical status of each patient.


Subject(s)
Adrenalectomy/methods , Laparoscopy/methods , Adrenal Gland Neoplasms/surgery , Adrenalectomy/standards , Humans , Laparoscopy/standards , Peritoneum/surgery , Reproducibility of Results , Retroperitoneal Space/surgery , Treatment Outcome
13.
Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. (1992, Impr.) ; Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. (1992, Impr.);65(5): 578-585, May 2019.
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1012969

ABSTRACT

The Guidelines Project, an initiative of the Brazilian Medical Association, aims to combine information from the medical field in order to standardize producers to assist the reasoning and decision-making of doctors. The information provided through this project must be assessed and criticized by the physician responsible for the conduct that will be adopted, depending on the conditions and the clinical status of each patient.


Subject(s)
Humans , Laparoscopy/methods , Adrenalectomy/methods , Peritoneum/surgery , Retroperitoneal Space/surgery , Reproducibility of Results , Treatment Outcome , Laparoscopy/standards , Adrenal Gland Neoplasms/surgery , Adrenalectomy/standards
15.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 44(6): 1174-1181, Nov.-Dec. 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-975656

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of total retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy with urinary-bladder junction resection for a tuberculous nonfunctional kidney. Materials and Methods: A total of 27 individuals diagnosed with unilateral nonfunctional kidney secondary to tuberculosis were treated between June 2011 and June 2015. All patients had normal renal function on the contralateral side and underwent the standard four-drug anti-tuberculosis treatment for at least four weeks before surgery. Total retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy was performed in all patients, and the urinary-bladder junction of distal ureter was managed using different auto-suture techniques. Results: Nineteen male and 8 female patients with an average age of 47.3 years (range, 36-64 years) underwent surgery. All the operations were successfully performed without conversion. The median operative time was 109.3 min (range, 75-138 min), the median blood loss was 157.5 mL (range, 70-250 mL), and the median hospitalization time was 3.7 days (range, 3-6 days). No serious perioperative complications occurred. Anti-tuberculosis chemotherapy was prescribed to all patients, with the entire course of treatment lasting six months. No recurrence of tuberculosis of the bladder or the contralateral kidney was observed during the median follow-up period of 26.7 months (range, 6-54 months). Conclusion: Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy with urinary-bladder junction resection is a safe and feasible approach for the treatment of tuberculous non-functional kidneys.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Tuberculosis, Renal/surgery , Laparoscopy/methods , Nephroureterectomy/methods , Retroperitoneal Space/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Operative Time , Middle Aged
16.
Rev. argent. cir ; 110(2): 81-85, jun. 2018. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-957898

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: comparar los resultados obtenidos en adrenalectomía retroperitoneoscópica posterior (ARP) con los obtenidos por vía transperitoneal lateral (ATL) a corto y mediano plazo. Material y métodos: estudio de cohortes prospectivo. Se incluyeron 22 pacientes a quienes se les realizaron 24 adrenalectomías (12 ARP y 12 ATL) entre los meses de enero de 2015 y mayo de 2016. En el grupo ARP se realizó a 1 paciente adrenalectomía bilateral simultánea y a 1 paciente, bilateral sincrónica. Fueron comparados datos basales, clínicos, quirúrgicos y evolutivos. Resultados: la mediana de tiempo de seguimiento fue de 6,5 meses (r 1-16). Los grupos ARP y ATL fueron comparables en edad, sexo, BMI y presencia de cirugías previas. Los adenomas fueron las lesiones predominantes (41,7% en cada grupo). El promedio de tiempo operatorio en ART y ATL fue 104,3 ± 21,2 y 146 ± 32,9 minutos, respectivamente (p 0,05). No hallamos diferencias en tiempo de internación, sangrado y complicaciones. Todos los pacientes lograron curación clínica. Conclusiones: la técnica ARP es una vía segura, con resultados comparables a ATL y menor tiempo operatorio. También permite intervenir de manera simultánea y sincrónica ambas glándulas adrenales sin necesidad de reposicionar al paciente.


Objetive: to compare the results of posterior retroperitoneoscopic (PRA) or lateral transperitoneal approach (LTA) in laparoscopic adrenalectomy in the short and medium term. Material y methods: prospective cohort study. We included 22 patients who underwent 24 adrenalectomies (12 PRA and 12 LTA) between January 2015 and May 2016. In the PRA group, two simultaneous bilateral laparoscopic adrenalectomies were performed (1 synchronous bilateral adrenalectomy). Baseline, clinical and surgical outcome were compared. Results: the median follow-up time was 6.5 months (range: 1-16). The PRA and LTA groups were comparable in age, gender, BMI and presence of previous surgeries. Adenomas were the predominant lesions (41.7% in each group). The average operating time in PRA and LTA was 104.3 ± 21.2 and 146 ± 32.9 minutes, respectively (p=0.05). We found no differences in length of hospital stay, bleeding and complications. All patients achieved clinical cure. Conclusions: the PRA technique is a safe approach, with results comparable to LTA and shorter operating time. It also allows to intervene simultaneously and synchronously both adrenal glands without the need of repositioning the patient.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Retroperitoneal Space/surgery , Laparoscopy/methods , Adrenalectomy , Body Mass Index , Prospective Studies , Cohort Studies
17.
Int Braz J Urol ; 44(6): 1174-1181, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29617083

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of total retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy with urinary-bladder junction resection for a tuberculous non-functional kidney. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 27 individuals diagnosed with unilateral non-functional kidney secondary to tuberculosis were treated between June 2011 and June 2015. All patients had normal renal function on the contralateral side and underwent the standard four-drug anti-tuberculosis treatment for at least four weeks before surgery. Total retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy was performed in all patients, and the urinary-bladder junction of distal ureter was managed using different auto-suture techniques. RESULTS: Nineteen male and 8 female patients with an average age of 47.3 years (range, 36-64 years) underwent surgery. All the operations were successfully performed without conversion. The median operative time was 109.3 min (range, 75-138 min), the median blood loss was 157.5 mL (range, 70-250 mL), and the median hospitalization time was 3.7 days (range, 3-6 days). No serious perioperative complications occurred. Anti-tuberculosis chemotherapy was prescribed to all patients, with the entire course of treatment lasting six months. No recurrence of tuberculosis of the bladder or the contralateral kidney was observed during the median follow-up period of 26.7 months (range, 6-54 months). CONCLUSION: Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy with urinary-bladder junction resection is a safe and feasible approach for the treatment of tuberculous non-functional kidneys.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy/methods , Nephroureterectomy/methods , Tuberculosis, Renal/surgery , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Operative Time , Retroperitoneal Space/surgery , Treatment Outcome
18.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 44(1): 63-68, Jan.-Feb. 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-892940

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objectives The aim of our study is to present early outcomes of our series of retroperitoneal-RAPN (Robot Assisted Partial Nephrectomy). Materials and methods From September 2010 until December 2015, we performed 81 RAPN procedures (44 at left kidney and 37 at right). Average size was 3cm (1-9). Average PADUA score 7.1 (5-10). Average surgical time (overall and only robot time), ischemia time, blood loss, pathological stage, complications and hospital stay have been recorded. Results All of the cases were completed successfully without any operative complication or surgical conversion. Average surgical time was 177 minutes (75-340). Operative time was 145 minutes (80-300), overall blood loss was 142cc (60-310cc). In 30 cases the pedicle was late clamped with an average ischemia time of 4 minutes (2-7). None of the patient had positive surgical margins at definitive histology (49pT1a, 12pT1b, 3pT2a, 2pT3a). Hospital stay was 3 days (2-7). Conclusions The retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy approach is safe and allows treatment of even quite complex tumors. It also combines the already well known advantages guaranteed by the da Vinci® robotic surgical system, with the advantages of the retroperitoneoscopic approach.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Retroperitoneal Space/surgery , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Nephrectomy/methods , Treatment Outcome , Middle Aged
19.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A ; 28(2): 168-173, 2018 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29215949

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the feasibility, clinical and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (L-RPLND) in the management of patients with germ cell tumors (GCT) and residual post-chemotherapy mass. METHODS: We report our experience of 25 patients treated with L-RPLND between 2008 and 2015. All 25 patients were diagnosed with GCT by primary pathological evaluation of the specimens after orchiectomy. All patients received cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The technique consisted of L-RPLND excision of the residual mass using unilateral template dissection. We assessed perioperative data and histological findings. RESULTS: Surgery was successfully completed in 24 (96%) patients, 1 patient required an open surgery due to intense adhesions of the mass to the inferior vena cava. Mean operation time was 213 minutes. Mean blood loss was 260 mL. Postoperative complications were upper limb osteomuscular pain in 2 patients and chylous ascites in 1 patient. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 2 days. The median residual mass diameter was 3.3 cm (range 1.1-6.6 cm). Histopathological findings were necrotic tissue in 9 patients, teratoma in 9 patients, viable tumor in 6 patients, and Castleman disease in 1 patient. The median follow-up was 30 months. Normal antegrade ejaculation was preserved in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic postchemotherapy RPLND is a feasible, safe, and highly oncologically efficient procedure, which has the benefits of minimally invasive surgery.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy/methods , Lymph Node Excision/methods , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/surgery , Testicular Neoplasms/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Lymph Node Excision/adverse effects , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm, Residual , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/drug therapy , Operative Time , Orchiectomy/adverse effects , Orchiectomy/methods , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Period , Retroperitoneal Space/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Testicular Neoplasms/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
20.
Int Braz J Urol ; 44(1): 63-68, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29211396

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study is to present early outcomes of our series of retroperitoneal-RAPN (Robot Assisted Partial Nephrectomy). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From September 2010 until December 2015, we performed 81 RAPN procedures (44 at left kidney and 37 at right). Average size was 3cm (1-9). Average PADUA score 7.1 (5-10). Average surgical time (overall and only robot time), ischemia time, blood loss, pathological stage, complications and hospital stay have been recorded. RESULTS: All of the cases were completed successfully without any operative complication or surgical conversion. Average surgical time was 177 minutes (75-340). Operative time was 145 minutes (80-300), overall blood loss was 142cc (60-310cc). In 30 cases the pedicle was late clamped with an average ischemia time of 4 minutes (2-7). None of the patient had positive surgical margins at definitive histology (49pT1a, 12pT1b, 3pT2a, 2pT3a). Hospital stay was 3 days (2-7). CONCLUSIONS: The retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy approach is safe and allows treatment of even quite complex tumors. It also combines the already well known advantages guaranteed by the da Vinci® robotic surgical system, with the advantages of the retroperitoneoscopic approach.


Subject(s)
Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Nephrectomy/methods , Retroperitoneal Space/surgery , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL