Pharmacokinetics of standard versus high-dose rifampin for tuberculosis preventive treatment: A sub-study of the 2R2 randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetic data of rifampin, when used for tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT) are not available. We aimed to describe the pharmacokinetics of rifampin used for TPT, at standard and higher doses, and to assess predictors of rifampin exposure. METHODS: A pharmacokinetic sub-study was performed in Bandung, Indonesia among participants in the 2R2 randomized trial, which compared TPT regimens of 2 months of high-dose rifampin at 20 mg/kg/day (2R20) and 30 mg/kg/day (2R30), with 4 months of standard-dose rifampin at 10 mg/kg/day (4R10) in adolescents and adults. Intensive pharmacokinetic sampling was performed after 2-8 weeks of treatment. Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed non-compartmentally. Total exposure (AUC0-24) and peak concentration (Cmax) between arms were compared using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc tests. Multivariable linear regression analyses were used to assess predictors of AUC0-24 and Cmax. RESULTS: We enrolled 51 participants in this study. In the 4R10, 2R20, and 2R30 arms, the geometric mean AUC0-24 was 68.0, 186.8, and 289.9 h⋅mg/L, and Cmax was 18.4, 36.7, and 54.4 mg/L, respectively; high interindividual variabilities were observed. Compared with the 4R10 arm, AUC0-24 and Cmax were significantly higher in the 2R20 and 2R30 arms (P < 0.001). Drug doses, body weight, and female sex were predictors of higher rifampin AUC0-24 and Cmax (P < 0.05). AUC0-24 and Cmax values were much higher than those previously reported in persons with TB disease. CONCLUSIONS: Doubling and tripling the rifampin dose led to three- and four-fold higher exposure compared to standard dose. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling and simulations are warranted to support trials of shortening the duration of TPT regimens with high-dose rifampin.

Genetic and clinical predictors of rifapentine and isoniazid pharmacokinetics in paediatrics with tuberculosis infection.

OBJECTIVES: Twelve weekly doses of rifapentine and isoniazid (3HP regimen) are recommended for TB preventive therapy in children with TB infection. However, they present with variability in the pharmacokinetic profiles. The current study aimed to develop a pharmacokinetic model of rifapentine and isoniazid in 12 children with TB infection using NONMEM. METHODS: Ninety plasma and 41 urine samples were collected at Week 4 of treatment. Drug concentrations were measured using a validated HPLC-UV method. MassARRAY® SNP genotyping was used to investigate genetic factors, including P-glycoprotein (ABCB1), solute carrier organic anion transporter B1 (SLCO1B1), arylacetamide deacetylase (AADAC) and N-acetyl transferase (NAT2). Clinically relevant covariates were also analysed. RESULTS: A two-compartment model for isoniazid and a one-compartment model for rifapentine with transit compartment absorption and first-order elimination were the best models for describing plasma and urine data. The estimated (relative standard error, RSE) of isoniazid non-renal clearance was 3.52 L·h-1 (23.1%), 2.91 L·h-1 (19.6%), and 2.58 L·h-1 (20.0%) in NAT2 rapid, intermediate and slow acetylators. A significant proportion of the unchanged isoniazid was cleared renally (2.7 L·h-1; 8.0%), while the unchanged rifapentine was cleared primarily through non-renal routes (0.681 L·h-1; 3.6%). Participants with the ABCB1 mutant allele had lower bioavailability of rifapentine, while food prolonged the mean transit time of isoniazid. CONCLUSIONS: ABCB1 mutant allele carriers may require higher rifapentine doses; however, this must be confirmed in larger trials. Food did not affect overall exposure to isoniazid and only delayed absorption time.

Extrapolation of lung pharmacokinetics of antitubercular drugs from preclinical species to humans using PBPK modelling.

OBJECTIVES: To develop physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models for widely used anti-TB drugs, namely rifampicin, pyrazinamide, isoniazid, ethambutol and moxifloxacin lung pharmacokinetics (PK)-regarding both healthy and TB-infected tissue (cellular lesion and caseum)-in preclinical species and to extrapolate to humans. METHODS: Empirical models were used for the plasma PK of each species, which were connected to multicompartment permeability-limited lung models within a middle-out PBPK approach with an appropriate physiological parameterization that was scalable across species. Lung's extracellular water (EW) was assumed to be the linking component between healthy and infected tissue, while passive diffusion was assumed for the drug transferring between cellular lesion and caseum. RESULTS: In rabbits, optimized unbound fractions in intracellular water of rifampicin, moxifloxacin and ethambutol were 0.015, 0.056 and 0.08, respectively, while the optimized unbound fractions in EW of pyrazinamide and isoniazid in mice were 0.25 and 0.17, respectively. In humans, all mean extrapolated daily AUC and Cmax values of various lung regions were within 2-fold of the observed ones. Unbound concentrations in the caseum were lower than unbound plasma concentrations for both rifampicin and moxifloxacin. For rifampicin, unbound concentrations in cellular rim are slightly lower, while for moxifloxacin they are significantly higher than unbound plasma concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: The developed PBPK approach was able to extrapolate lung PK from preclinical species to humans and to predict unbound concentrations in the various TB-infected regions, unlike empirical lung models. We found that plasma free drug PK is not always a good surrogate for TB-infected tissue unbound PK.

Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Evidence From a Phase 3 Trial to Support Flat-Dosing of Rifampicin for Tuberculosis.

BACKGROUND: The optimal dosing strategy for rifampicin in treating drug-susceptible tuberculosis (TB) is still highly debated. In the phase 3 clinical trial Study 31/ACTG 5349 (NCT02410772), all participants in the control regimen arm received 600 mg rifampicin daily as a flat dose. Here, we evaluated relationships between rifampicin exposure and efficacy and safety outcomes. METHODS: We analyzed rifampicin concentration time profiles using population nonlinear mixed-effects models. We compared simulated rifampicin exposure from flat- and weight-banded dosing. We evaluated the effect of rifampicin exposure on stable culture conversion at 6 months; TB-related unfavorable outcomes at 9, 12, and 18 months using Cox proportional hazard models; and all trial-defined safety outcomes using logistic regression. RESULTS: Our model-derived rifampicin exposure ranged from 4.57 mg · h/L to 140.0 mg · h/L with a median of 41.8 mg · h/L. Pharmacokinetic simulations demonstrated that flat-dosed rifampicin provided exposure coverage similar to the weight-banded dose. Exposure-efficacy analysis (n = 680) showed that participants with rifampicin exposure below the median experienced similar hazards of stable culture conversion and TB-related unfavorable outcomes compared with those with exposure above the median. Exposure-safety analysis (n = 722) showed that increased rifampicin exposure was not associated with increased grade 3 or higher adverse events or serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Flat-dosing of rifampicin at 600 mg daily may be a reasonable alternative to the incumbent weight-banded dosing strategy for the standard-of-care 6-month regimen. Future research should assess the optimal dosing strategy for rifampicin, at doses higher than the current recommendation.

Predicting Drug-Drug Interactions Involving Rifampicin Using a Semi-mechanistic Hepatic Compartmental Model.

AIMS: To develop a semi-mechanistic hepatic compartmental model to predict the effects of rifampicin, a known inducer of CYP3A4 enzyme, on the metabolism of five drugs, in the hope of informing dose adjustments to avoid potential drug-drug interactions. METHODS: A search was conducted for DDI studies on the interactions between rifampicin and CYP substrates that met specific criteria, including the availability of plasma concentration-time profiles, physical and absorption parameters, pharmacokinetic parameters, and the use of healthy subjects at therapeutic doses. The semi-mechanistic model utilized in this study was improved from its predecessors, incorporating additional parameters such as population data (specifically for Chinese and Caucasians), virtual individuals, gender distribution, age range, dosing time points, and coefficients of variation. RESULTS: Optimal parameters were identified for our semi-mechanistic model by validating it with clinical data, resulting in a maximum difference of approximately 2-fold between simulated and observed values. PK data of healthy subjects were used for most CYP3A4 substrates, except for gilteritinib, which showed no significant difference between patients and healthy subjects. Dose adjustment of gilteritinib co-administered with rifampicin required a 3-fold increase of the initial dose, while other substrates were further tuned to achieve the desired drug exposure. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetic parameters AUCR and CmaxR of drugs metabolized by CYP3A4, when influenced by Rifampicin, were predicted by the semi-mechanistic model to be approximately twice the empirically observed values, which suggests that the semi-mechanistic model was able to reasonably simulate the effect. The doses of four drugs adjusted via simulation to reduce rifampicin interaction.

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling of imatinib and N-desmethyl imatinib for drug-drug interaction predictions.

The first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib has revolutionized the development of targeted cancer therapy and remains among the frontline treatments, for example, against chronic myeloid leukemia. As a substrate of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C8, CYP3A4, and various transporters, imatinib is highly susceptible to drug-drug interactions (DDIs) when co-administered with corresponding perpetrator drugs. Additionally, imatinib and its main metabolite N-desmethyl imatinib (NDMI) act as inhibitors of CYP2C8, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4 affecting their own metabolism as well as the exposure of co-medications. This work presents the development of a parent-metabolite whole-body physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for imatinib and NDMI used for the investigation and prediction of different DDI scenarios centered around imatinib as both a victim and perpetrator drug. Model development was performed in PK-Sim® using a total of 60 plasma concentration-time profiles of imatinib and NDMI in healthy subjects and cancer patients. Metabolism of both compounds was integrated via CYP2C8 and CYP3A4, with imatinib additionally transported via P-glycoprotein. The subsequently developed DDI network demonstrated good predictive performance. DDIs involving imatinib and NDMI were simulated with perpetrator drugs rifampicin, ketoconazole, and gemfibrozil as well as victim drugs simvastatin and metoprolol. Overall, 12/12 predicted DDI area under the curve determined between first and last plasma concentration measurements (AUClast) ratios and 12/12 predicted DDI maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) ratios were within twofold of the respective observed ratios. Potential applications of the final model include model-informed drug development or the support of model-informed precision dosing.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of high-dose isoniazid for the treatment of rifampicin- or multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Indonesia.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetic data on high-dose isoniazid for the treatment of rifampicin-/multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (RR/MDR-TB) are limited. We aimed to describe the pharmacokinetics of high-dose isoniazid, estimate exposure target attainment, identify predictors of exposures, and explore exposure-response relationships in RR/MDR-TB patients. METHODS: We performed an observational pharmacokinetic study, with exploratory pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses, in Indonesian adults aged 18-65 years treated for pulmonary RR/MDR-TB with standardized regimens containing high-dose isoniazid (10-15 mg/kg/day) for 9-11 months. Intensive pharmacokinetic sampling was performed after ≥2 weeks of treatment. Total plasma drug exposure (AUC0-24) and peak concentration (Cmax) were assessed using non-compartmental analyses. AUC0-24/MIC ratio of 85 and Cmax/MIC ratio of 17.5 were used as exposure targets. Multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses were used to identify predictors of drug exposures and responses, respectively. RESULTS: We consecutively enrolled 40 patients (median age 37.5 years). The geometric mean isoniazid AUC0-24 and Cmax were 35.4 h·mg/L and 8.5 mg/L, respectively. Lower AUC0-24 and Cmax values were associated (P < 0.05) with non-slow acetylator phenotype, and lower Cmax values were associated with male sex. Of the 26 patients with MIC data, less than 25% achieved the proposed targets for isoniazid AUC0-24/MIC (n = 6/26) and Cmax/MIC (n = 5/26). Lower isoniazid AUC0-24 values were associated with delayed sputum culture conversion (>2 months of treatment) [adjusted OR 0.18 (95% CI 0.04-0.89)]. CONCLUSIONS: Isoniazid exposures below targets were observed in most patients, and certain risk groups for low isoniazid exposures may require dose adjustment. The effect of low isoniazid exposures on delayed culture conversion deserves attention.

PBTK model-based analysis of CYP3A4 induction and the toxicokinetics of the pyrrolizidine alkaloid retrorsine in man.

Cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4 induction by drugs and pesticides plays a critical role in the enhancement of pyrrolizidine alkaloid (PA) toxicity as it leads to increased formation of hepatotoxic dehydro-PA metabolites. Addressing the need for a quantitative analysis of this interaction, we developed a physiologically-based toxicokinetic (PBTK) model. Specifically, the model describes the impact of the well-characterized CYP3A4 inducer rifampicin on the kinetics of retrorsine, which is a prototypic PA and contaminant in herbal teas. Based on consumption data, the kinetics after daily intake of retrorsine were simulated with concomitant rifampicin treatment. Strongest impact on retrorsine kinetics (plasma AUC 24 and C max reduced to 67% and 74% compared to the rifampicin-free reference) was predicted directly after withdrawal of rifampicin. At this time point, the competitive inhibitory effect of rifampicin stopped, while CYP3A4 induction was still near its maximum. Due to the impacted metabolism kinetics, the cumulative formation of intestinal retrorsine CYP3A4 metabolites increased to 254% (from 10 to 25 nmol), while the cumulative formation of hepatic CYP3A4 metabolites was not affected (57 nmol). Return to baseline PA toxicokinetics was predicted 14 days after stop of a 14-day rifampicin treatment. In conclusion, the PBTK model showed to be a promising tool to assess the dynamic interplay of enzyme induction and toxification pathways.

Rifampin- and Silymarin-Mediated Pharmacokinetic Interactions of Exogenous and Endogenous Substrates in a Transgenic OATP1B Mouse Model.

Organic anion-transporting polypeptides (OATP) 1B1 and OATP1B3, encoded by the SLCO gene family of the solute carrier superfamily, are involved in the disposition of many exogenous and endogenous compounds. Preclinical rodent models help assess risks of pharmacokinetic interactions, but interspecies differences in transporter orthologs and expression limit direct clinical translation. An OATP1B transgenic mouse model comprising a rodent Slco1a/1b gene cluster knockout and human SLCO1B1 and SLCO1B3 gene insertions provides a potential physiologically relevant preclinical tool to predict pharmacokinetic interactions. Pharmacokinetics of exogenous probe substrates, pitavastatin and pravastatin, and endogenous OATP1B biomarkers, coproporphyrin-I and coproporphyrin-III, were determined in the presence and absence of known OATP/Oatp inhibitors, rifampin or silymarin (an extract of milk thistle [Silybum marianum]), in wild-type FVB mice and humanized OATP1B mice. Rifampin increased exposure of pitavastatin (4.6- and 2.8-fold), pravastatin (3.6- and 2.2-fold), and coproporphyrin-III (1.6- and 2.1-fold) in FVB and OATP1B mice, respectively, but increased coproporphyrin-I AUC0-24h only (1.8-fold) in the OATP1B mice. Silymarin did not significantly affect substrate AUC, likely because the silymarin flavonolignan concentrations were at or below their reported IC50 values for the relevant OATPs/Oatps. Silymarin increased the Cmax of pitavastatin 2.7-fold and pravastatin 1.9-fold in the OATP1B mice. The data of the OATP1B mice were similar to those of the pitavastatin and pravastatin clinical data; however, the FVB mice data more closely recapitulated pitavastatin clinical data than the data of the OATP1B mice, suggesting that the OATP1B mice are a reasonable, though costly, preclinical strain for predicting pharmacokinetic interactions when doses are optimized to achieve clinically relevant plasma concentrations.

Effects of rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics and safety of carotegrast methyl in healthy subjects: A randomized 2 × 2 crossover study.

AIMS: To evaluate the effect of the combination of carotegrast methyl with rifampicin, a potent inhibitor of organic anion transporter polypeptide, on the pharmacokinetics (PKs), safety and tolerability of carotegrast methyl. METHODS: In this 2 × 2 crossover study in 20 healthy Japanese adults, 10 subjects received carotegrast methyl 960 mg and rifampicin 600 mg on day 1 and received carotegrast methyl 960 mg on day 8. The subjects in the other sequence received the same treatments but in the opposite order. The 90% confidence interval (CI) of the geometric mean ratio of the Cmax and AUC0-t for carotegrast, the main active metabolite of carotegrast methyl, with/without rifampicin was calculated. If the 90% CI fell within the range of 0.80-1.25, this indicated the absence of any drug-drug interaction. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored. RESULTS: The geometric mean ratios (90% CI) of the Cmax and AUC0-t for carotegrast with/without rifampicin were 4.78 (3.64-6.29) and 5.59 (4.60-6.79), respectively, indicating that carotegrast has a PK interaction with rifampicin. The combination with rifampicin increased the exposure of carotegrast and also that of its metabolites. The incidence of any AEs with/without rifampicin was five (25.0%) and one (5.0%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of carotegrast methyl with rifampicin significantly increased the exposure of carotegrast compared with carotegrast methyl administration alone. In this single dose study, the incidence of AEs of carotegrast methyl with rifampicin increased compared with carotegrast methyl alone, but the incidence of adverse drug reactions did not increase with combination administration.

Pharmacokinetics and Optimal Dosing of Levofloxacin in Children for Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Each year 25 000-32 000 children develop rifampicin- or multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (RR/MDR-TB), and many more require preventive treatment. Levofloxacin is a key component of RR/MDR-TB treatment and prevention, but the existing pharmacokinetic data in children have not yet been comprehensively summarized. We aimed to characterize levofloxacin pharmacokinetics through an individual patient data meta-analysis of available studies and to determine optimal dosing in children. METHODS: Levofloxacin concentration and demographic data were pooled from 5 studies and analyzed using nonlinear mixed effects modeling. Simulations were performed using current World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended and model-informed optimized doses. Optimal levofloxacin doses were identified to target median adult area under the time-concentration curve (AUC)24 of 101 mg·h/L given current standard adult doses. RESULTS: Data from 242 children (2.8 years [0.2-16.8] was used). Apparent clearance was 3.16 L/h for a 13-kg child. Age affected clearance, reaching 50% maturation at birth and 90% maturation at 8 months. Nondispersible tablets had 29% lower apparent oral bioavailability compared to dispersible tablets. Median exposures at current WHO-recommended doses were below the AUC target for children weighing <24 kg and under <10 years, resulting in approximately half of the exposure in adults. Model-informed doses of 16-33 mg/kg for dispersible tablets or 16-50 mg/kg for nondispersible tablets were required to meet the AUC target without significantly exceeding the median adult Cmax. CONCLUSIONS: Revised weight-band dosing guidelines with doses of >20 mg/kg are required to ensure adequate exposure. Further studies are needed to determine safety and tolerability of these higher doses.

Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of the CYP3A4 and CYP2C9 Drug-Drug Interaction of Avacopan in 2 Open-Label Studies in Healthy Participants.

Avacopan, a complement 5a receptor (C5aR) antagonist approved for treating severe active antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis, was evaluated in 2 clinical drug-drug interaction studies. The studies assessed the impact of avacopan on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of CYP3A4 substrates midazolam and simvastatin and CYP2C9 substrate celecoxib, and the influence of CYP3A4 inhibitor itraconazole and inducer rifampin on the PKs of avacopan. The results indicated that twice-daily oral administration of 30 mg of avacopan increased the area under the curve (AUC) of midazolam by 1.81-fold and celecoxib by 1.15-fold when administered without food, and twice-daily oral administration of 30 or 60 mg of avacopan increased the AUC of simvastatin by approximately 2.6-3.5-fold and the AUC of the active metabolite ß-hydroxy-simvastatin acid by approximately 1.4-1.7-fold when co-administered with food. Furthermore, the AUC of avacopan increased by approximately 2.19-fold when co-administered with itraconazole and decreased by approximately 13.5-fold when co-administered with rifampin. These findings provide critical insights into the potential drug-drug interactions involving avacopan, which could have significant implications for patient care and treatment planning. (NCT06207682).

Evaluation of the drug-drug interaction potential of brigatinib using a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling approach.

Brigatinib is an oral anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor approved for the treatment of ALK-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. In vitro studies indicated that brigatinib is primarily metabolized by CYP2C8 and CYP3A4 and inhibits P-gp, BCRP, OCT1, MATE1, and MATE2K. Clinical drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies with the strong CYP3A inhibitor itraconazole or the strong CYP3A inducer rifampin demonstrated that CYP3A-mediated metabolism was the primary contributor to overall brigatinib clearance in humans. A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for brigatinib was developed to predict potential DDIs, including the effect of moderate CYP3A inhibitors or inducers on brigatinib pharmacokinetics (PK) and the effect of brigatinib on the PK of transporter substrates. The developed model was able to predict clinical DDIs with itraconazole (area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity [AUC∞] ratio [with/without itraconazole]: predicted 1.86; observed 2.01) and rifampin (AUC∞ ratio [with/without rifampin]: predicted 0.16; observed 0.20). Simulations using the developed model predicted that moderate CYP3A inhibitors (e.g., verapamil and diltiazem) may increase brigatinib AUC∞ by ~40%, whereas moderate CYP3A inducers (e.g., efavirenz) may decrease brigatinib AUC∞ by ~50%. Simulations of potential transporter-mediated DDIs predicted that brigatinib may increase systemic exposures (AUC∞) of P-gp substrates (e.g., digoxin and dabigatran) by 15%-43% and MATE1 substrates (e.g., metformin) by up to 29%; however, negligible effects were predicted on BCRP-mediated efflux and OCT1-mediated uptake. The PBPK analysis results informed dosing recommendations for patients receiving moderate CYP3A inhibitors (40% brigatinib dose reduction) or inducers (up to 100% increase in brigatinib dose) during treatment, as reflected in the brigatinib prescribing information.

Linezolid does not improve bactericidal activity of rifampin-containing first-line regimens in animal models of TB meningitis.

Tuberculous meningitis (TB meningitis) is the most devastating form of tuberculosis (TB) and there is a critical need to optimize treatment. Linezolid is approved for multidrug resistant TB and has shown encouraging results in retrospective TB meningitis studies, with several clinical trials underway assessing its additive effects on high-dose (35 mg/kg/day) or standard-dose (10 mg/kg/day) rifampin-containing regimens. However, the efficacy of adjunctive linezolid to rifampin-containing first-line TB meningitis regimens and the tissue pharmacokinetics (PK) in the central nervous system (CNS) are not known. We therefore conducted cross-species studies in two mammalian (rabbits and mice) models of TB meningitis to test the efficacy of linezolid when added to the first-line TB regimen and measure detailed tissue PK (multicompartmental positron emission tomography [PET] imaging and mass spectrometry). Addition of linezolid did not improve the bactericidal activity of the high-dose rifampin-containing regimen in either animal model. Moreover, the addition of linezolid to standard-dose rifampin in mice also did not improve its efficacy. Linezolid penetration (tissue/plasma) into the CNS was compartmentalized with lower than previously reported brain and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) penetration, which decreased further two weeks after initiation of treatment. These results provide important data regarding the addition of linezolid for the treatment of TB meningitis.

Population pharmacokinetic model of rifampicin for personalized tuberculosis pharmacotherapy: Effects of SLCO1B1 polymorphisms on drug exposure.

BACKGROUND: Rifampicin (RIF) exhibits high pharmacokinetic (PK) variability among individuals; a low plasma concentration might result in unfavorable treatment outcomes and drug resistance. This study evaluated the contributions of non- and genetic factors to the interindividual variability of RIF exposure, then suggested initial doses for patients with different weight bands. METHODS: This multicenter prospective cohort study in Korea analyzed demographic and clinical data, the solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1 (SLCO1B1) genotypes, and RIF concentrations. Population PK modeling and simulations were conducted using nonlinear mixed-effect modeling. RESULTS: In total, 879 tuberculosis (TB) patients were divided into a training dataset (510 patients) and a test dataset (359 patients). A one-compartment model with allometric scaling for effect of body size best described the RIF PKs. The apparent clearance (CL/F) was 16.6% higher among patients in the SLCO1B1 rs4149056 wild-type group than among patients in variant group, significantly decreasing RIF exposure in the wild-type group. The developed model showed better predictive performance compared with previously reported models. We also suggested that patients with body weights of <40 kg, 40-55 kg, 55-70 kg, and >70 kg patients receive RIF doses of 450, 600, 750, and 1050 mg/day, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Total body weight and SLCO1B1 rs4149056 genotypes were the most significant covariates that affected RIF CL/F variability in Korean TB patients. We suggest initial doses of RIF based on World Health Organization weight-band classifications. The model may be implemented in treatment monitoring for TB patients.

Pharmacokinetic assessment of rifampicin and des-acetyl rifampicin in carbon tetrachloride induced liver injury model in Wistar rats.

OBJECTIVES: Preclinical evidence is needed to assess drug-metabolite behaviour in compromised liver function for developing the best antitubercular treatment (ATT) re-introduction regimen in drug-induced liver injury (DILI). The pharmacokinetic behavior of rifampicin (RMP) and its active metabolite des-acetyl-rifampicin (DARP) in DILI's presence is unknown. To study the pharmacokinetic behavior of RMP and DARP in the presence of carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) plus ATT-DILI in rats. METHODS: Thirty rats used in the experiment were divided equally into six groups. We administered a single 0.5 mL/kg CCl4 intraperitoneal injection in all rats. Groups II, III, IV, and V were started on daily oral RMP alone, RMP plus isoniazid (INH), RMP plus pyrazinamide (PZA), and the three drugs INH, RMP, and PZA together, respectively, for 21-days subsequently. Pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling was performed at 0, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h post-dosing on day 20. We monitored LFT at baseline on days-1, 7, and 21 and sacrificed the rats on the last day of the experiment. RESULTS: ATT treatment sustained the CCl4-induced liver injury changes. A significant rise in mean total bilirubin levels was observed in groups administered rifampicin. The triple drug combination group demonstrated 1.43- and 1.84-times higher area-under-the-curve values of RMP (234.56±30.66 vs. 163.55±36.14 µg h/mL) and DARP (16.15±4.50 vs. 8.75±2.79 µg h/mL) compared to RMP alone group. Histological and oxidative stress changes supported underlying liver injury and PK alterations. CONCLUSIONS: RMP metabolism inhibition by PZA, more than isoniazid, was well preserved in the presence of underlying liver injury.

Optimizing dosing of the cycloserine pro-drug terizidone in children with rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis.

There are no pharmacokinetic data in children on terizidone, a pro-drug of cycloserine and a World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended group B drug for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) treatment. We collected pharmacokinetic data in children <15 years routinely receiving 15-20 mg/kg of daily terizidone for RR-TB treatment. We developed a population pharmacokinetic model of cycloserine assuming a 2-to-1 molecular ratio between terizidone and cycloserine. We included 107 children with median (interquartile range) age and weight of 3.33 (1.55, 5.07) years and 13.0 (10.1, 17.0) kg, respectively. The pharmacokinetics of cycloserine was described with a one-compartment model with first-order elimination and parallel transit compartment absorption. Allometric scaling using fat-free mass best accounted for the effect of body size, and clearance displayed maturation with age. The clearance in a typical 13 kg child was estimated at 0.474 L/h. The mean absorption transit time when capsules were opened and administered as powder was significantly faster compared to when capsules were swallowed whole (10.1 vs 72.6 min) but with no effect on bioavailability. Lower bioavailability (-16%) was observed in children with weight-for-age z-score below -2. Compared to adults given 500 mg daily terizidone, 2022 WHO-recommended pediatric doses result in lower exposures in weight bands 3-10 kg and 36-46 kg. We developed a population pharmacokinetic model in children for cycloserine dosed as terizidone and characterized the effects of body size, age, formulation manipulation, and underweight-for-age. With current terizidone dosing, pediatric cycloserine exposures are lower than adult values for several weight groups. New optimized dosing is suggested for prospective evaluation.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of first-line tuberculosis drugs rifampin, isoniazid, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide during pregnancy and postpartum: results from IMPAACT P1026s.

Physiological changes during pregnancy may alter the pharmacokinetics (PK) of antituberculosis drugs. The International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Network P1026s was a multicenter, phase IV, observational, prospective PK and safety study of antiretroviral and antituberculosis drugs administered as part of clinical care in pregnant persons living with and without HIV. We assessed the effects of pregnancy on rifampin, isoniazid, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide PK in pregnant and postpartum (PP) persons without HIV treated for drug-susceptible tuberculosis disease. Daily antituberculosis treatment was prescribed following World Health Organization-recommended weight-band dosing guidelines. Steady-state 12-hour PK profiles of rifampin, isoniazid, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide were performed during second trimester (2T), third trimester (3T), and 2-8 of weeks PP. PK parameters were characterized using noncompartmental analysis, and comparisons were made using geometric mean ratios (GMRs) with 90% confidence intervals (CI). Twenty-seven participants were included: 11 African, 9 Asian, 3 Hispanic, and 4 mixed descent. PK data were available for 17, 21, and 14 participants in 2T, 3T, and PP, respectively. Rifampin and pyrazinamide AUC0-24 and C max in pregnancy were comparable to PP with the GMR between 0.80 and 1.25. Compared to PP, isoniazid AUC0-24 was 25% lower and C max was 23% lower in 3T. Ethambutol AUC0-24 was 39% lower in 3T but limited by a low PP sample size. In summary, isoniazid and ethambutol concentrations were lower during pregnancy compared to PP concentrations, while rifampin and pyrazinamide concentrations were similar. However, the median AUC0-24 for rifampin, isoniazid, and pyrazinamide met the therapeutic targets. The clinical impact of lower isoniazid and ethambutol exposure during pregnancy needs to be determined.

Simplified urine-based method to detect rifampin underexposure in adults with tuberculosis: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study.

Variable pharmacokinetics of rifampin in tuberculosis (TB) treatment can lead to poor outcomes. Urine spectrophotometry is simpler and more accessible than recommended serum-based drug monitoring, but its optimal efficacy in predicting serum rifampin underexposure in adults with TB remains uncertain. Adult TB patients in New Jersey and Virginia receiving rifampin-containing regimens were enrolled. Serum and urine samples were collected over 24 h. Rifampin serum concentrations were measured using validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, and total exposure (area under the concentration-time curve) over 24 h (AUC0-24) was determined through noncompartmental analysis. The Sunahara method was used to extract total rifamycins, and rifampin urine excretion was measured by spectrophotometry. An analysis of 58 eligible participants, including 15 (26%) with type 2 diabetes mellitus, demonstrated that urine spectrophotometry accurately identified subtarget rifampin AUC0-24 at 0-4, 0-8, and 0-24 h. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC ROC) values were 0.80 (95% CI 0.67-0.90), 0.84 (95% CI 0.72-0.94), and 0.83 (95% CI 0.72-0.93), respectively. These values were comparable to the AUC ROC of 2 h serum concentrations commonly used for therapeutic monitoring (0.82 [95% CI 0.71-0.92], P = 0.6). Diabetes status did not significantly affect the AUC ROCs for urine in predicting subtarget rifampin serum exposure (P = 0.67-0.92). Spectrophotometric measurement of urine rifampin excretion within the first 4 or 8 h after dosing is a simple and cost-effective test that accurately predicts rifampin underexposure. This test provides critical information for optimizing tuberculosis treatment outcomes by facilitating appropriate dose adjustments.

Rifampicin reduces plasma concentration of linezolid in patients with infective endocarditis.

BACKGROUND: Linezolid in combination with rifampicin has been used in treatment of infective endocarditis especially for patients infected with staphylococci. OBJECTIVES: Because rifampicin has been reported to reduce the plasma concentration of linezolid, the present study aimed to characterize the population pharmacokinetics of linezolid for the purpose of quantifying an effect of rifampicin cotreatment. In addition, the possibility of compensation by dosage adjustments was evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pharmacokinetic measurements were performed in 62 patients treated with linezolid for left-sided infective endocarditis in the Partial Oral Endocarditis Treatment (POET) trial. Fifteen patients were cotreated with rifampicin. A total of 437 linezolid plasma concentrations were obtained. The pharmacokinetic data were adequately described by a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and first-order elimination. RESULTS: We demonstrated a substantial increase of linezolid clearance by 150% (95% CI: 78%-251%), when combined with rifampicin. The final model was evaluated by goodness-of-fit plots showing an acceptable fit, and a visual predictive check validated the model. Model-based dosing simulations showed that rifampicin cotreatment decreased the PTA of linezolid from 94.3% to 34.9% and from 52.7% to 3.5% for MICs of 2 mg/L and 4 mg/L, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial interaction between linezolid and rifampicin was detected in patients with infective endocarditis, and the interaction was stronger than previously reported. Model-based simulations showed that increasing the linezolid dose might compensate without increasing the risk of adverse effects to the same degree.