Effectiveness of Spironolactone in Reducing Osteoporosis and Future Fracture Risk in Middle-Aged and Elderly Hypertensive Patients.

Objective: While the role of aldosterone in bone metabolism is well established, the specific effects of the widely used aldosterone antagonist, spironolactone, on bone health are not fully understood. This study aimed to investigate the effects of spironolactone on osteoporosis and future fracture risk in middle-aged and elderly hypertensive patients, revealing its potential benefits for bone health. Methods: Propensity score matching was employed in this study to create matched groups of spironolactone users and non-users at a 1:4 ratio. We investigated the association between spironolactone use and the risk of osteoporosis using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Furthermore, we conducted multivariate linear regression analysis to explore the relationship between cumulative dosage and the FRAX score. Subgroup analysis was also performed to assess the effects under different stratification conditions. Results: In both pre-match and post-match analyses, multivariable logistic regression revealed a significant reduction in the risk of osteoporosis in the spironolactone usage group (pre-match: odds ratios [OR] 0.406, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.280-0.588; post-match: OR 0.385, 95% CI, 0.259-0.571). Furthermore, post-match multivariable linear regression demonstrated a clear negative correlation between cumulative spironolactone dosage and the FRAX score. Subgroup analyses consistently supported these findings. Conclusion: This study offers evidence supporting the significant positive impact of the antihypertensive drug spironolactone on bone health, resulting in a substantial reduction in the risk of osteoporosis and future fractures in hypertensive patients. Future research should consider conducting large-scale, multicenter, randomized controlled trials to further investigate the long-term effects of spironolactone on bone health in hypertensive patients.

Common Skin Conditions in Children and Adolescents: Acne.

Acne is a chronic, recurrent inflammatory condition of the pilosebaceous unit. It affects approximately 85% of adolescents and creates significant psychosocial and financial burdens. The pathogenesis involves altered follicular growth and differentiation, microbial colonization with Cutibacterium acnes, increased sebum production influenced by androgen levels, and inflammation. Evidence-based risk factors include family history and body mass index. Diagnosis of acne is clinical, according to patient age and acne morphology and severity. Setting treatment expectations is an important aspect of management. For mild acne, benzoyl peroxide is an effective first-line drug as monotherapy or in combination with a topical retinoid and/or topical antibiotic. Oral tetracyclines are first-line drugs as part of a multipart treatment regimen for moderate to severe acne for patients older than 8 years. Oral isotretinoin is the first-line drug for moderate to severe inflammatory acne. Because of its teratogenic effects, its prescribing is monitored through the iPLEDGE Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) program. Prescribing oral or topical antibiotics as monotherapy for acne is not recommended, as this may increase microbial resistance. Combined oral contraceptives and spironolactone are used as adjunctive therapies in female adolescents. Patients with skin of color, pregnant patients, and transgender or gender diverse patients warrant special considerations in acne management.

Organokines and liver enzymes in adolescent girls with polycystic ovary syndrome during randomized treatments.

Introduction: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is often associated with metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). MAFLD has been associated with altered hepatic function, systemic dysmetabolism, and abnormal circulating levels of signaling molecules called organokines. Here, we assessed the effects of two randomized treatments on a set of organokines in adolescent girls with PCOS and without obesity, and report the associations with circulating biomarkers of liver damage, which were assessed longitudinally in the aforementioned studies as safety markers. Materials and methods: Liver enzymes [aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT)] were assessed as safety markers in previous randomized pilot studies comparing the effects of an oral contraceptive (OC) with those of a low-dose combination of spironolactone-pioglitazone-metformin (spiomet) for 1 year. As a post hoc endpoint, the organokines fibroblast growth factor-21 (FGF21), diazepam-binding protein-1 (DBI), and meteorin-like protein (METRNL) were assessed by ELISA after 6 months of OC (N = 26) or spiomet (N = 28). Auxological, endocrine-metabolic, body composition (using DXA), and abdominal fat partitioning (using MRI) were also evaluated. Healthy, age-matched adolescent girls (N = 17) served as controls. Results: Circulating ALT and GGT levels increased during OC treatment and returned to baseline concentrations in the post-treatment phase; in contrast, spiomet treatment elicited no detectable changes in ALT and GGT concentrations. In relation to organokines after 6 months of treatment, (1) FGF21 levels were significantly higher in PCOS adolescents than in control girls; (2) DBI levels were lower in OC-treated girls than in controls and spiomet-treated girls; and (3) no differences were observed in METRNL concentrations between PCOS girls and controls. Serum ALT and GGT levels were directly correlated with circulating METRNL levels only in OC-treated girls (R = 0.449, P = 0.036 and R = 0.552, P = 0.004, respectively). Conclusion: The on-treatment increase in ALT and GGT levels occurring only in OC-treated girls is associated with circulating METRNL levels, suggesting enhanced METRNL synthesis as a reaction to the hepatic changes elicited by OC treatment. Clinical Trial Registration: https://doi.org, identifiers 10.1186/ISRCTN29234515, 10.1186/ISRCTN11062950.

Combination of spironolactone and DPP-4 inhibitors for treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a literature review.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still causing hospitalization and death, and vaccination appears to become less effective with each emerging variant. Spike, non-spike, and other possible unrecognized mutations have reduced the efficacy of recommended therapeutic approaches, including monoclonal antibodies, plasma transfusion, and antivirals. SARS-CoV-2 binds to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and probably dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) to initiate the process of endocytosis by employing host proteases such as transmembrane serine protease-2 (TMPRSS-2) and ADAM metallopeptidase domain 17 (ADAM17). Spironolactone reduces the amount of soluble ACE2 and antagonizes TMPRSS-2 and ADAM17. DPP-4 inhibitors play immunomodulatory roles and may block viral entry. The efficacy of treatment with a combination of spironolactone and DPP-4 inhibitors does not appear to be affected by viral mutations. Therefore, the combination of spironolactone and DPP-4 inhibitors might improve the clinical outcome for COVID-19 patients by decreasing the efficiency of SARS-CoV-2 entry into cells and providing better anti-inflammatory, antiproliferative, and antifibrotic effects than those achieved using current therapeutic approaches such as antivirals and monoclonal antibodies.

Individualized Treatment Effect Prediction with Machine Learning - Salient Considerations.

BACKGROUND: Machine learning-based approaches that seek to accomplish individualized treatment effect prediction have gained traction; however, some salient challenges lack wider recognition. METHODS: We describe key methodologic considerations for individualized treatment effect prediction models using data from the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist Trial for spironolactone in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. The causal survival forest algorithm was used for model development. Calibration and discrimination were evaluated using a bootstrapping-based internal validation procedure. Observed benefits were described for predicted benefit quartiles and quartiles of a known effect modifier: ejection fraction. A negative control analysis with noncardiovascular death as the outcome was implemented to detect confounding. RESULTS: Among 3445 participants, 671 events occurred over a median of 3.3 years of follow-up. In internal validation, a higher average observed benefit was noted among patients in the highest quartile of predicted benefit. The median (interquartile range) of the observed restricted mean survival time difference at 3.3 years at the highest quartile of model-predicted benefit was 62 days (32 to 83) and was 47 days (26 to 67) at the lowest quartile of ejection fraction. Body-mass index had higher contribution to prediction of benefit relative to other included measures (33.7% vs. glomerular filtration rate [27.3%], ejection fraction [15.1%], and younger age [12.8%]) No benefit was observed for noncardiovascular death at higher model-predicted benefit quartiles, although benefit for noncardiovascular death was observed at lower quartiles. CONCLUSIONS: Carefully applied and validated predictive models hold promise in identifying heterogeneous treatment effects and are useful for hypothesis generation regarding the role of phenotypic characteristics in modifying the benefit of experimental interventions in clinical trials. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00094302.).

A review regarding the article 'Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a network meta-analysis of 32 randomized trials'.

Heart failure (HF) is a prevalent clinical syndrome characterized by significant morbidity and is often precipitated by impaired left ventricular myocardial function. The condition can be categorized into two primary forms based on the ejection fraction (EF): Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Evidence-based treatments for HF have been instrumental in reducing morbidity and mortality, particularly in patients with HFrEF. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) represent a cornerstone in the pharmacological management of HF, with a strong indication for use in HFrEF. Notably, pharmacological nuances exist among MRAs, which may influence therapeutic decision-making for individual patients. Moreover, MRAs have been shown to enhance heart rate variability and improve cardiac sympathetic nervous system function in HF patients. Spironolactone, an MRA, has been a pivotal agent in the clinical management of HFrEF since its introduction. However, its use has been tempered by certain side effects, including gynecomastia and hyperkalemia, leading to considerable discontinuation rates among patients. To address these challenges, numerous randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have been conducted to assess the efficacy and safety profiles of alternative steroidal and non-steroidal MRAs. Eplerenone, a steroidal MRA introduced subsequent to spironolactone, has demonstrated efficacy with a more favorable side effect profile.

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 32 randomized trials.

INTRODUCTION: Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have examined mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) evaluated the comparative efficacy and safety of MRAs in HFrEF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE(Pubmed), Scopus, Cochrane and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched until April 8, 2024 for RCTs examining the efficacy and/or safety of MRAs in HFrEF. Double-independent study selection, extraction and quality assessment were performed. Random-effects frequentist NMA models were used. Evidence certainty was assessed via Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). RESULTS: Totally, 32 RCTs (15685 patients) were analyzed. Eplerenone ranked above spironolactone in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio {HR}=0.78, 95% confidence interval {CI} [0.66,0.91], GRADE:"Moderate"), cardiovascular death (HR=0.74, 95%CI [0.53, 1.04], GRADE:"Low") and in all safety outcomes. Spironolactone was superior to eplerenone in the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization (HR=0.67, 95%CI [0.50,0.89], GRADE:"Moderate"), HF hospitalization (HR=0.61, 95%CI [0.43,0.86], GRADE:"Moderate"), all-cause hospitalization (HR=0.51, 95%CI [0.26,0.98], GRADE:"Moderate") and cardiovascular hospitalization (HR=0.56, 95%CI [0.37,0.84], GRADE:"Moderate"). Canrenone ranked first in all-cause mortality, the composite outcome and HF hospitalization. Finerenone ranked first in hyperkalemia (risk ratio [RR]=1.56, 95%CI [0.89,2.74], GRADE:"Moderate"), renal injury (RR=0.56, 95%CI [0.24,1.29]), any adverse event (RR=0.84, 95%CI [0.75,0.94], GRADE:"Moderate"), treatment discontinuation (RR=0.89, 95%CI [0.64,1.23]) and hypotension (RR=1.06, 95%CI [0.12,9.41]). CONCLUSIONS: MRAs are effective in HFrEF with certain safety disparities. Spironolactone and eplerenone exhibited similar efficacy, however, eplerenone demonstrated superior safety. Finerenone was the safest MRA, while canrenone exhibited considerable efficacy, nonetheless, evidence for these MRAs were scarce.

Beta blockers are associated with lower all-cause mortality among HFpEF patients.

BACKGROUND: The evidence regarding beta blocker (BB) benefit in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains inconclusive, leading to consideration of BB withdrawal in this population. OBJECTIVES: In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the association of BB on all-cause mortality in HFpEF patients. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study of 20,206 patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) ≥ 50% who were hospitalized with decompensated HF between January 2011 and March 2020. Survival is reported at 30 days, 1 year, and 3 years. A secondary analysis comparing mortality for patients on BB with additional indications including hypertension (HTN), coronary artery disease (CAD), and atrial fibrillation (AF) was completed. Mortality was compared between patients on BB and additional therapies of spironolactone or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEi/ARBs). RESULTS: BB showed lower all-cause mortality at 30 days, 1 year, and 3 years (p < 0.0001). This association with lower all-cause mortality was validated by a supplementary propensity score-matched analysis. At 3 years, there was significant mortality reduction with addition of BB to either spironolactone (p = 0.0359) or ACEi/ARBs (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In a large single-center retrospective registry, BB use was associated with lower mortality in HFpEF patients with a recent decompensated HF hospitalization. The mortality benefit persisted in those treated with spironolactone or ACEi/ARBs, and in those with AF. This provocative data further highlights the uncertainty of the benefit of BB use in this cohort and calls for re-consideration of BB withdrawal, especially in those tolerating it well, without conclusive, large, and randomized trials showing lack of benefit or harm.

The efficacy of Topical Clascoterone versus systematic spironolactone for treatment of acne vulgaris: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of topical clascoterone (TC) compared to oral spironolactone for acne vulgaris treatment. METHODS: A computerized search through PubMed/MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Library was conducted to find relevant papers. We used the "netmeta" and "meta" packages for network meta-analysis (NMA) in RStudio 1.2.5019 (2009-2019 RStudio, Inc.) to conduct all of our statistical tests. RESULTS: Seven articles (n = 2,006 patients) were included. The fixed-effect size showed that TC 1% bis in die (BID) showed potential effectiveness in reducing the inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesion count compared to placebo (Standardized mean difference, SMD = -0.27, 95% CI: -0.36 to -0.17) and (SMD = -0.31, 95% CI: -0.41 to -0.22), respectively. The random-effect size showed that TC 1% BID was significantly associated with a 12-week treatment success compared to placebo (Odds ratio, OR = 2.44, 95% CI: 1.12 to 5.30). Spironolactone 200 mg was associated with a significant reduction in total lesion count (SMD = -4.46, 95% CI: -5.60 to -3.32). CONCLUSION: TC appears to reduce both inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesion count and may lead to treatment success. Spironolactone at 200 mg showed potential effectiveness in terms of total lesion count reduction. These results suggest that both TC and Spironolactone could be beneficial in treating patients with acne vulgaris.

Therapeutic efficacy of candidate antischistosomal drugs in a murine model of schistosomiasis mansoni.

Schistosomiasis is a neglected tropical disease associated with considerable morbidity. Praziquantel (PZQ) is effective against adult schistosomes, yet, it has little effect on juvenile stages, and PZQ resistance is emerging. Adopting the drug repurposing strategy as well as assuming enhancing the efficacy and lessening the doses and side effects, the present study aimed to investigate the in vivo therapeutic efficacy of the widely used antiarrhythmic, amiodarone, and diuretic, spironolactone, and combinations of them compared to PZQ. Mice were infected by Schistosoma mansoni "S. mansoni" cercariae (Egyptian strain), then they were divided into two major groups: Early- [3 weeks post-infection (wpi)] and late- [6 wpi] treated. Each group was subdivided into seven subgroups: positive control, PZQ, amiodarone, spironolactone, PZQ combined with amiodarone, PZQ combined with spironolactone, and amiodarone combined with spironolactone-treated groups. Among the early-treated groups, spironolactone had the best therapeutic impact indicated by a 69.4% reduction of total worm burden (TWB), 38.6% and 48.4% reduction of liver and intestine egg load, and a significant reduction of liver granuloma number by 49%. Whereas, among the late-treated groups, amiodarone combined with PZQ was superior to PZQ alone evidenced by 96.1% reduction of TWB with the total disappearance of female and copula in the liver and intestine, 53.1% and 84.9% reduction of liver and intestine egg load, and a significant reduction of liver granuloma number by 67.6%. Comparatively, spironolactone was superior to PZQ and amiodarone in the early treatment phase targeting immature stages, while amiodarone had a more potent effect when combined with PZQ in the late treatment phase targeting mature schistosomes.

Effects of different treatment modalities on cardiovascular disease in ARR-positive hypertensive patients.

Data on the prognosis of clinically undiagnosed hypertensive patients who are aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) positive are still scarce. Therefore, we investigated the clinical characteristics of clinically undiagnosed hypertensive patients who were ARR-positive and the influence of their different treatments on the occurrence and development of complications. A total of 285 hypertensive patients data with ARR ≥ 3.8 in the Second People's Hospital of Huai'an from January 2019 to December 2021 were collected, and 135 undiagnosed hypertensive patients were ultimately included in the analysis. According to their treatment strategy in various clinical departments, 135 patients were divided into the operation, spironolactone and control groups. Then, the clinical characteristics and the occurrence and development of complications in the three groups were compared. The results suggested that: (1) Only 34 (11.9%) of 285 hypertensive patients with ARR ≥ 3.8 were clearly diagnosed with Primary aldosteronism (PA) through functional tests, and the blood pressure (BP) compliance rate was only 50.30% during follow-up. (2) Based on exclusion criteria, 135 undiagnosed hypertensive patients were eventually included in the analysis. Patients in the surgery group had lower blood potassium levels and higher aldosterone levels than those in the other two groups, and their risk of new cerebrovascular complications was lower than that of the patients in the spironolactone group. (3) The risk of new cerebrovascular complications in the spironolactone group was 9.520 times higher than that of the control group, and this risk mainly occurred in patients with ARR values of 3.8-5.7. On the whole, surgery remains a good option for hypertensive patients with severe hyperaldosteronism and hypokalemia and those unable to undergo confirmatory tests; however, spironolactone therapy in patients with clinically undiagnosed hypertension, especially those with 3.8 ≤ ARR < 5.7, confered a higher risk of new cerebrovascular complications.

Blood Pressure Lowering in Patients With Central Hypertension: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Cuff blood pressure (BP) is recommended for guiding hypertension management. However, central BP has been proposed as a superior clinical measurement. This study aimed to determine whether controlling hypertension as measured by central BP was beneficial in reducing left ventricular mass index beyond control of standard cuff hypertension. METHODS: This multicenter, open-label, blinded-end point trial was conducted in individuals treated for uncomplicated hypertension with controlled cuff BP (<140/90 mm Hg) but elevated central BP (≥0.5 SD above age- and sex-specific normal values). Participants were randomized to 24-months intervention with spironolactone 25 mg/day (n=148) or usual care control (n=153). The primary outcome was change in left ventricular mass index measured by cardiac MRI. Cuff and central BPs were measured by clinic, 7-day home and 24-hour ambulatory BPs. RESULTS: At 24-months, there was a greater reduction in left ventricular mass index (-3.2 [95% CI, -5.0 to -1.3] g/m2; P=0.001) with intervention compared with control. Cuff and central BPs were lowered by a similar magnitude across all BP measurement modes (eg, clinic cuff systolic BP, -6.16 [-9.60 to -2.72] mm Hg and clinic central systolic BP, -4.96 [-8.06 to -1.86] mm Hg; P≥0.48 all). Secondary analyses found that changes in left ventricular mass index correlated to changes in BP, with the magnitude of effect nearly identical for BP measured by cuff (eg, 24-hour systolic BP, ß, 0.17 [0.02-0.31] g/m2) or centrally (24-hour systolic BP, ß, 0.16 [0.01-0.32] g/m2). CONCLUSIONS: Among individuals with central hypertension, spironolactone had beneficial effects in reducing LV mass. Secondary analyses showed that changes in LV mass were equally well associated with lower measured standard cuff BP and central BP. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/; Unique identifier: ACTRN12613000053729.

The effect of different treatment strategies on glycolipid metabolism disorders and cardiovascular events in primary aldosteronism.

Recent studies have explored the association between primary aldosteronism and cardiovascular disease incidence. The association between specific primary aldosteronism treatments and differential improvement in cardiovascular event rates is yet to be established. This study was designed to compare the relative effects of spironolactone therapy and surgical intervention on cardiovascular outcomes among primary aldosteronism patients. This retrospective observational study included 853 primary aldosteronism patients from the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University between 2014 and 2022. Patients who had completed abdominal computed tomography (CT) examinations with similar metabolic characteristics and 6-month follow-up analyses were included in this study. These patients were separated into a surgical treatment group (n = 33) and a spironolactone treatment group (n = 51). Demographic data, biochemical analysis results, liver/spleen (L/S) X-ray attenuation ratio, hospitalization frequency, and cardiovascular events were compared between the two groups. The spironolactone group demonstrated significantly improved metabolic characteristics compared to the surgical group, shown by lower BMI, blood pressure, total cholesterol (TC), insulin resistance index (IRI), and reduced non-alcoholic fatty liver disease prevalence. Metabolic parameters did not differ significantly within the surgical treatment group when comparing pre- and postoperative values. The incidence of cardiovascular events was lower in the spironolactone group compared to the surgery group (23/33 vs. 20/51, P < 0.001) despite higher hospitalization rates(37/31 vs. 61/53, P < 0.001). In patients with primary aldosteronism, spironolactone treatment is more effective than surgical intervention in remediating abnormal lipid and glucose metabolism while improving cardiovascular outcomes. Chinese clinical trial registry registration number: ChiCTR2300074574.

Solution is not simple; sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor use in Conn syndrome.

PURPOSE: In patients with bilateral primary hyperaldosteronism (PA) and those with unilateral PA who are unwilling or unable to undergo adrenalectomy an increase in plasma renin activity (PRA) provided by mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) therapy reflects sufficient antagonism for elevated aldosterone. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2-i) have cardiovascular, renal protective properties and some clinical data have shown an increase in PRA levels with SGLT2-i. Here, we present our experience of using SGLT2-i in PA patients with suppressed PRA despite 100 mg/day spironolactone therapy. CASES: We prospectively evaluate the laboratory values of seven patients who were diagnosed with bilateral hyperaldosteronism. All of them were diabetic and had an HbA1c <7% with metformin treatment alone. Spironolactone was started in all of the patients after diagnosis and although the dose was increased to 100 mg/day, PRA levels remained <1 ng/ml/h. Metformin treatment was changed to empagliflozin in all patients and PRA was checked again at the sixth month of treatment. RESULTS: Metformin treatment was changed to empagliflozin in all patients and PRA was checked again at the sixth month of treatment. Mean PRA levels were 0.464 ±â€…0.189 ng/ml/h before the treatment change and increased to mean 3.257 ±â€…1.881 ng/ml/h in the sixth month ( P  = 0.008). The mean PRA was >1 ng/ml/h except for one patient in the sixth month of treatment. CONCLUSION: Larger molecular and clinical studies are needed to understand whether the increase in PRA after empagliflozin treatment indicates interference, whether spironolactone treatment has become more effective, or whether empagliflozin has aldosterone receptor antagonism apart from its known effects.

Proteomic profiles of left atrial volume and its influence on response to spironolactone: Findings from the HOMAGE trial and STANISLAS cohort.

AIMS: High left ventricular filling pressure increases left atrial volume and causes myocardial fibrosis, which may decrease with spironolactone. We studied clinical and proteomic characteristics associated with left atrial volume indexed by body surface area (LAVi), and whether LAVi influences the response to spironolactone on biomarker expression and clinical variables. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the HOMAGE trial, where people at risk of heart failure were randomized to spironolactone or control, we analysed 421 participants with available LAVi and 276 proteomic measurements (Olink) at baseline, month 1 and 9 (mean age 73 ± 6 years; women 26%; LAVi 32 ± 9 ml/m2). Circulating proteins associated with LAVi were also assessed in asymptomatic individuals from a population-based cohort (STANISLAS; n = 1640; mean age 49 ± 14 years; women 51%; LAVi 23 ± 7 ml/m2). In both studies, greater LAVi was significantly associated with greater left ventricular masses and volumes. In HOMAGE, after adjustment and correction for multiple testing, greater LAVi was associated with higher concentrations of matrix metallopeptidase-2 (MMP-2), insulin-like growth factor binding protein-2 (IGFBP-2) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (false discovery rates [FDR] <0.05). These associations were externally replicated in STANISLAS (all FDR <0.05). Among these biomarkers, spironolactone decreased concentrations of MMP-2 and NT-proBNP, regardless of baseline LAVi (pinteraction > 0.10). Spironolactone also significantly reduced LAVi, improved left ventricular ejection fraction, lowered E/e', blood pressure and serum procollagen type I C-terminal propeptide (PICP) concentration, a collagen synthesis marker, regardless of baseline LAVi (pinteraction > 0.10). CONCLUSION: In individuals without heart failure, LAVi was associated with MMP-2, IGFBP-2 and NT-proBNP. Spironolactone reduced these biomarker concentrations as well as LAVi and PICP, irrespective of left atrial size.

Therapeutic potential of ramipril, losartan, and spironolactone against sepsis-associated liver tissue injury induced by cecal ligation and puncture in rats.

OBJECTIVE: Sepsis-associated liver injury is responsible for the high morbidity and mortality rates seen with septic shock. Activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is an essential counteractive mechanism during the hypotensive phase of sepsis; however, excessive activation is associated with exaggerated pro-oxidant and inflammatory response, which aggravates organ damage. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of RAAS inhibition on sepsis-induced liver damage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) model was employed as a model of sepsis. Rats were divided into five groups: sham-operated, vehicle-treated septic rats, septic rats treated with ramipril in a dose of 10 mg/kg, septic rats treated with losartan in a dose of 20 mg/kg, and finally septic rats treated with spironolactone in a dose of 25 mg/kg. Rats received the treatment one hour after induction. Twenty-four hours later, rats were euthanized, and serum samples and liver tissue were collected to evaluate liver function and hepatic oxidative, anti-oxidative, inflammatory, and apoptotic markers. The microscopic integrity of the hepatic tissue was also assessed. RESULTS: The results of our study showed that all the treatments used ameliorated sepsis-induced liver injury. This was reflected by improved liver function parameters and histopathological appearance of liver tissue. Treatment with ramipril, losartan, or spironolactone reduced tissue malondialdehyde (MDA), nitric oxide, activated caspase-3, and TNF-α. Moreover, these drugs increased hepatic reduced-glutathione (GSH) levels, superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) expression. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of ramipril, losartan, or spironolactone after CLP produced a hepatoprotective effect in rats, possibly by reducing oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis.

Effect of spironolactone on survival in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported inconsistent results regarding the advantages or disadvantages of spironolactone use in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). This study aimed to evaluate survival according to the use of spironolactone in a large sample of patients undergoing maintenance HD. METHODS: This retrospective study used laboratory and clinical data from the national HD Quality Assessment Program and claims data. The participants of the quality assessment program were patients who had been undergoing maintenance HD for ≥ 3 months, patients undergoing HD at least twice a week. Patients with no spironolactone prescription during the assessment periods were designated as the control group. Patients with one or more prescriptions of spironolactone during the assessment periods were assigned to the SPR group. RESULTS: The number of patients in the control and SPR groups were 54,588 and 315, respectively. The 5-year survival rates were 69.1% and 59.1% in the control and SPR groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Cox regression analyses showed that the hazard ratio in the SPR group was 1.34 (P < 0.001) in univariate analysis and 1.13 (P = 0.249) in multivariable analysis. Univariate Cox-regression analysis showed a better patient survival rate in the control group than in the SPR group; however, multivariable analyses showed similar patient survival rates between the two groups. CONCLUSION: This study showed no difference in survival between patients undergoing HD with and without spironolactone use.