Decoding potential targets and pharmacologic mechanisms of curcumin in treating non-small cell lung carcinoma via bioinformatics and molecular docking.

Emerging evidence demonstrates that curcumin has an inhibitory effect on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and its targets and mechanism of action need further exploration. The goal of this study was to explore the potential targets and mechanism of curcumin against NSCLC by network pharmacology, bioinformatics, and experimental validation, thereby providing more insight into combination treatment with curcumin for NSCLC in preclinical and clinical research. Curcumin targets against NSCLC were predicted based on HIT2.0, STD, CTD, and DisGeNET, and the core targets were analyzed via protein-protein interaction network construction (PPI), Gene Ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), and molecular docking. The gene expression levels of samples in A549 cells, NCI-H460, and curcumin treated groups were detected by real-time quantitative PCR. A total of 67 common targets between curcumin and NSCLC were collected by screening public databases. GO and KEGG analysis suggested that curcumin treatment of NSCLC mainly involves cancer-related pathways, such as PI3K-AKT signaling pathway, Foxo signaling pathway, microRNAs, MAPK signaling pathway, HIF-1 signaling pathway, etc. The targets with the highest degree were identified through the PPI network, namely CASP3, CTNNB1, JUN, IL6, MAPK3, HIF1A, STAT3, AKT1, TP53, CCND1, VEGFA, and EGFR. The results of the in vitro experiments showed that curcumin treatment of NSCLC down-regulated the gene expressions of CCND1, CASP3, HIF1A, IL-6, MAPK3, STAT3, AKT1, and TP53. Our findings revealed that curcumin functions as a potential therapeutic candidate for NSCLC by suppressing multiple signaling pathways and interacting with multiple gene targets.

Prognostic impact of nectin-like molecule-5 (CD155) expression in non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: CD155 is a transmembrane protein that inhibits antitumor immune response and represents a predictor of worse prognosis in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, it remains unexplored its association with clinical characteristics and genomic status of Latin American patients. This study characterizes the CD155 expression and its clinical implications in this population. METHODS: Tissue biopsies from 86 patients with locally-advanced or metastatic NSCLC were assessed for CD155 protein expression, ALK rearrangements and EGFR mutations. Cutoff values for high CD155 expression (CD155high) were determined from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves according to 2-year survival. It was evaluated its association with clinicopathological features, median progression-free survival (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS). RESULTS: the cutoff score for CD155high was 155 in the entire cohort and in patients without oncogenic alterations, and it was 110 in patients with oncogenic alterations. Eighty-four patients (97.7%) were CD155 positive, of which fifty-six (65.0%) had CD155high. EGFR L858R mutation related to lower CD155 IHC score than exon 19 deletion. Individuals with CD155high showed a shorter mOS (13.0 vs. 30.8 months; HR: 1.96 [95% CI, 1.15-3.35]; p = 0.014). Patients without oncogenic alterations having a CD155high displayed shorter mPFS (1.6 vs. 6.4 months, HR: 2.09 [95% CI, 1.06-4.20]; p = 0.034) and mOS (2.9 vs. 23.1 months; HR: 1.27 [95% CI, 1.07- 4.42]; p = 0.032). Patients with oncogenic alterations having CD155high only showed a trend to shorter mOS (26.3 vs. 52.0 months; HR: 2.39 [95% CI, 0.98-5.83]; p = 0.058). CONCLUSION: CD155high is a predictor of worse outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC, predominantly among those without oncogenic alterations. CD155 could be a potential biomarker and a molecular target in patients with poor responses to current therapies.

Beyond tobacco: genomic disparities in lung cancer between smokers and never-smokers.

BACKGROUND: Tobacco use is one of the main risk factors for Lung Cancer (LC) development. However, about 10-20% of those diagnosed with the disease are never-smokers. For Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) there are clear differences in both the clinical presentation and the tumor genomic profiles between smokers and never-smokers. For example, the Lung Adenocarcinoma (LUAD) histological subtype in never-smokers is predominately found in young women of European, North American, and Asian descent. While the clinical presentation and tumor genomic profiles of smokers have been widely examined, never-smokers are usually underrepresented, especially those of a Latin American (LA) background. In this work, we characterize, for the first time, the difference in the genomic profiles between smokers and never-smokers LC patients from Chile. METHODS: We conduct a comparison by smoking status in the frequencies of genomic alterations (GAs) including somatic mutations and structural variants (fusions) in a total of 10 clinically relevant genes, including the eight most common actionable genes for LC (EGFR, KRAS, ALK, MET, BRAF, RET, ERBB2, and ROS1) and two established driver genes for malignancies other than LC (PIK3CA and MAP2K1). Study participants were grouped as either smokers (current and former, n = 473) or never-smokers (n = 200) according to self-report tobacco use at enrollment. RESULTS: Our findings indicate a higher overall GA frequency for never-smokers compared to smokers (58 vs. 45.7, p-value < 0.01) with the genes EGFR, KRAS, and PIK3CA displaying the highest prevalence while ERBB2, RET, and ROS1 the lowest. Never-smokers present higher frequencies in seven out of the 10 genes; however, smokers harbor a more complex genomic profile. The clearest differences between groups are seen for EGFR (15.6 vs. 21.5, p-value: < 0.01), PIK3CA (6.8 vs 9.5) and ALK (3.2 vs 7.5) in favor of never-smokers, and KRAS (16.3 vs. 11.5) and MAP2K1 (6.6 vs. 3.5) in favor of smokers. Alterations in these genes are comprised almost exclusively by somatic mutations in EGFR and mainly by fusions in ALK, and only by mutations in PIK3CA, KRAS and MAP2K1. CONCLUSIONS: We found clear differences in the genomic landscape by smoking status in LUAD patients from Chile, with potential implications for clinical management in these limited-resource settings.

Exploration of efficacy of different therapy regimens for advanced NSCLC patients with KRAS mutation in the first-line treatment.

PURPOSE: The treatment of the advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with KRAS mutation has been closely paid more attention. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of different first-line regimens in advanced KRAS-mutated non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: In our retrospective study, we collected patients with advanced NSCLC with KRAS mutation in Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between January 2015 and May 2023. We analyzed the benefit of different first-line therapy according to theraputic methods and the differential effect of the same treatment method among KRAS-mutated subtypes. We divided the patients into group A (A1, chemotherapy alone; A2, immunotherapy alone) and group B (B1, chemotherapy plus immunotherapy; B2, chemotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy; B3, chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy plus antiangiogenic therapy). The Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to reflect the PFS and OS of different methods. The objective response rate (ORR) and the disease control rate (DCR) were used to evaluated the response. RESULTS: We enrolled 227 patients including eighty-two with KRAS G12C mutation. The ORR and DCR of first-line treatment in the overall population were 32.2% and 80.6% respectively. The median PFS was 6.7 months and the median OS was 17.4 months for the overall population. The PFS of the Group B was significantly better than that of the Group A (7.7 months vs 5.4 months, P = 0.003), while no significant difference in OS was observed (19.4 months vs 15.0 months, P = 0.077). In the Group B, chemotherapy combined immunotherapy with antiangiogenic therapy showed better PFS than chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (14.1 months vs 7.7 months, P = 0.049), and OS also showed that tendency of difference (31.9 months vs 19.3 months, P = 0.158). There was no statistically significant difference between KRAS G12C and non-G12C mutation according to first-line treatment methods, whereas patients with TP53 co-mutation showed a better survival benefit (OS, 23.7 vs 12.5 months, P = 0.023). CONCLUSION: In the first-line treatment, combination regimen has advantages over single regimen. Among them, chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy plus antiangiogenic therapy can achieve significant efficacy benefits.

Clinical difference on the variants and co-mutation in a Chinese cohort with ALK-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Despite the generally favourable prognoses observed in patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there remains significant variability in clinical outcomes. The objective of this study is to enhance patient stratification by examining both the specific sites of gene fusion and the presence of co-occurring mutations. METHODS: We collected retrospective clinical and pathological data on ALK-positive patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. ALK fusion variants and concomitant mutations were identified through next-generation sequencing technology. We then assessed treatment efficacy via tumor response and survival metrics. RESULTS: This study included a total of 59 patients, with 49 harboring echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4)-ALK fusions and 10 presenting with rare fusions. The median follow-up period was 33 months. Clinical outcomes between non-EML4-ALK and EML4-ALK patients were comparable. Among the EML4-ALK cohort, patients with longer variants (v1, v2, v8) demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) (median PFS: 34 months vs. 11 months; hazard ratio [HR]: 2.28; P = 0.05) compared to those with shorter variants (v3, v5). Furthermore, patients treated with second-generation ALK inhibitors (ALKi) displayed a progression-free survival advantage (median PFS: not reached [NR] vs. 9 months; HR: 5.37; P = 0.013). Baseline TP53 co-mutation were linked with a substantially shorter OS (median OS,37 months vs. NR; HR 2.74; P = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: In ALK+ NSCLC, longer EML4-ALK variants correlate with improved prognosis and enhanced response to second-generation ALKi, while TP53 co-mutations indicate a negative prognosis.

Prognostic model based on B cell marker genes for NSCLC patients under neoadjuvant immunotherapy by integrated analysis of single-cell and bulk RNA-sequencing data.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has evolved as an effective option to treat non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). B cells play essential roles in the immune system as well as cancer progression. However, the repertoire of B cells and its association with clinical outcomes remains unclear in NSCLC patients receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy. METHODS: Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and bulk RNA sequencing data for LUAD samples were accessed from the TCGA and GEO databases. LUAD-related B cell marker genes were confirmed based on comprehensive analysis of scRNA-seq data. We then constructed the B cell marker gene signature (BCMGS) and validated it. In addition, we evaluated the association of BCGMS with tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) characteristics. Furthermore, we validated the efficacy of BCGMS in a cohort of NSCLC patients receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy. RESULTS: A BCMGS was constructed based on the TCGA cohort and further validated in three independent GSE cohorts. In addition, the BCMGS was proven to be significantly associated with TIME characteristics. Moreover, a relatively higher risk score indicated poor clinical outcomes and a worse immune response among NSCLC patients receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: We constructed an 18-gene prognostic signature derived from B cell marker genes based on scRNA-seq data, which had the potential to predict the prognosis and immune response of NSCLC patients receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

MET alterations in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Precision medicine has helped identify several tumor molecular aberrations to be treated with targeted therapies. These therapies showed substantial improvement in efficacy without excessive toxicity in patients with specific oncogenic drivers with advanced cancers. In metastatic lung cancers, the implementation of broad platforms for molecular tumor sequencing has helped oncology providers identify oncogenic drivers linked with better outcomes when treated upfront with targeted therapies. Mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET) alterations are present in up to 60% of non-small cell lung cancer and are associated with a poor prognosis. Capmatinib and tepotinib are currently the only two approved targeted therapies by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for patients with MET exon 14 skipping mutation. Several agents are being developed to tackle an unmet need in patients with MET alterations. Some of these agents are being used in combination with EGFR targeted therapy to mitigate resistance to EGFR inhibitor. These agents are poised to provide new hope for these patients.

Bevacizumab improved prognosis for advanced EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma with brain metastasis receiving cerebral radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether the combined use of bevacizumab could improve overall survival (OS) in patients with brain metastasis (BM), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing cerebral radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 237 patients with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma and BM met the inclusion criteria for this retrospective study, including 102 patients in the bevacizumab treatment group and 135 in the non-bevacizumab group. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify EGFR-mutated BM prognostic factors for these patients. RESULTS: At the end of the last follow-up period, 176 patients (74.3%) had died, and the median overall survival (OS) was 34.2 months. We observed a significant difference in the median OS between the bevacizumab and non-bevacizumab groups (45.8 months vs 30.0 months, P < 0.0001). Among the 178 (75.1%) patients who received cerebral radiotherapy, the median OS of patients in the bevacizumab + cerebral radiotherapy group was 45.8 months versus 32.0 months in the non-bevacizumab + cerebral radiotherapy group, respectively (P = 0.0007). Patients treated with bevacizumab after cerebral radiotherapy had a longer median OS than patients treated with bevacizumab before cerebral radiotherapy (59.4 months vs 33.7 months, P = 0.0198). In the univariate analysis, smoking status, Lung-molGPA scores, and bevacizumab therapy showed correlations (HR = 1.450, P = 0.045; HR = 0.700, P = 0.023; HR = 0.499, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that bevacizumab therapy alone (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.514; P < 0.001) was independently associated with improved OS. CONCLUSION: In patients with BM from EGFR-mutated NSCLC, cerebral radiotherapy with bevacizumab markedly improved OS. This improvement was more evident after cerebral radiotherapy.

Personalizing non-small cell lung cancer treatment through patient-derived xenograft models: preclinical and clinical factors for consideration.

PURPOSE: In the pursuit of creating personalized and more effective treatment strategies for lung cancer patients, Patient-Derived Xenografts (PDXs) have been introduced as preclinical platforms that can recapitulate the specific patient's tumor in an in vivo model. We investigated how well PDX models can preserve the tumor's clinical and molecular characteristics across different generations. METHODS: A Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) PDX model was established in NSG-SGM3 mice and clinical and preclinical factors were assessed throughout subsequent passages. Our cohort consisted of 40 NSCLC patients, which were used to create 20 patient-specific PDX models in NSG-SGM3 mice. Histopathological staining and Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) analysis were preformed to understand tumor heterogeneity throughout serial passages. RESULTS: The main factors that contributed to the growth of the engrafted PDX in mice were a higher grade or stage of disease, in contrast to the long duration of chemotherapy treatment, which was negatively correlated with PDX propagation. Successful PDX growth was also linked to poorer prognosis and overall survival, while growth pattern variability was affected by the tumor aggressiveness, primarily affecting the first passage. Pathology analysis showed preservation of the histological type and grade; however, WES analysis revealed genomic instability in advanced passages, leading to the inconsistencies in clinically relevant alterations between the PDXs and biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the impact of multiple clinical and preclinical factors on the engraftment success, growth kinetics, and tumor stability of patient-specific NSCLC PDXs, and underscores the importance of considering these factors when guiding and evaluating prolonged personalized treatment studies for NSCLC patients in these models, as well as signaling the imperative for additional investigations to determine the full clinical potential of this technique.

The role of angiogenesis inhibitors associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the first-line treatment for EGFR-mutated advanced lung cancer.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the standard treatment for epidermal growth factor receptor mutant (EGFRm) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Combining TKIs with an angiogenesis inhibitor has shown promise in pre-clinical studies. A systematic search of clinical trials found that combining erlotinib (a first-generation TKI) with bevacizumab or ramucirumab (angiogenesis inhibitors) improved progression-free survival (PFS) in EGFRm advanced NSCLC patients compared to TKI alone. However, no significant benefit in overall survival (OS) was observed in trials. Similar efficacy was seen in patients with specific EGFR mutations. Third generation TKIs were used as second-line therapy for patients with the T790M mutation. The combination treatment was associated with a higher incidence of severe adverse events. Overall, combining erlotinib or another TKI with an angiogenesis inhibitor is a safe and effective alternative for first-line treatment in EGFRm advanced NSCLC, particularly in countries without access to osimertinib and for patients with the EGFR L858R mutation.

Impact of platinum-based chemotherapy on the tumor mutational burden and immune microenvironment in non-small cell lung cancer with postoperative recurrence.

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy on the immunotherapeutic biomarkers of postoperative recurrent tumors in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: This study involved twenty-two cases of NSCLC, all of which underwent postoperative platinum-based chemotherapy, with matched surgical samples obtained from both their primary tumors (PTs) and recurrent tumors (RTs). Multiplex immunofluorescence was performed to assess the tumor proportion score (TPS) and immune cells (IC) on whole sections. Whole exon sequencing (WES) was conducted to investigate the tumor mutational burden (TMB) and tumor neoantigen burden (TNB). RESULTS: Compared to paired PTs, RTs exhibited higher PD-L1 expression, along with a slightly elevated density of intratumoral PD-L1+ cells (p = 0.082) and an increased tumor proportion score (mean TPS: 40.51% vs. 28.56%, p = 0.046). Regarding IC infiltration, RTs generally demonstrated significantly lower CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) density (p = 0.011) and lower CD68+ macrophage density (p = 0.005), with a loss of tertiary lymphoid structure (TLS). The comparison between RTs and PTs revealed no significant differences in TMB (p = 0.795), whereas the count of TNB in RTs was notably increased compared to PTs (p = 0.033). Prognosis analysis indicated that a higher density of CD8+ CTLs in RTs was positively correlated with improved overall survival (OS). CONCLUSIONS: In NSCLC patients with a history of postoperative platinum-based chemotherapy, the RTs demonstrated a trend towards increased PD-L1 expression and TMB/TNB, but a state of immunosuppression characterized by decreased ICs and loss of TLS, which may potentially impact the therapeutic benefits of immunotherapy.

Identification of non-actionable mutations with prognostic and predictive value in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Lung cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers and the leading cause of cancer death. Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients frequently harbor mutations that impact their survival outcomes. There are limited data regarding the prognostic and predictive significance of these mutations on survival outcomes in the real-world setting. METHODS: This observational retrospective study analyzed de-identified electronic medical records from the Flatiron Health Clinico-Genomic and FoundationCore® databases to identify patients with aNSCLC who initiated first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI; alone or in combination) or chemotherapy under routine care between 2016 and 2021. The primary objectives were to assess the prevalence of non-actionable mutations and to determine their association with overall survival (OS). Real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and real-world response (rwR) were investigated as secondary exploratory outcomes. RESULTS: Based on an assessment of 185 non-actionable mutations in 2999 patients, the most prevalent mutations were TP53 (70%), KRAS (42%), CDKN2A/B (31%), and STK11 (21%). STK11, KEAP1, and CDKN2A/B mutations were significantly associated with lower rwR, shorter rwPFS and OS. KRAS mutations were clinically associated with shorter rwPFS in CIT-treated patients. Subgroup analysis revealed that fast progressors were significantly more likely to harbor STK11, KEAP1, and CDKN2A/B mutations. Accordingly, long-term survivors (LTS) showed a significantly lower prevalence of these mutations. CONCLUSION: Our results provide evidence on the prognostic value of STK11, KEAP1, and CDKN2A/B mutations in patients with aNSCLC. Further research is required to better understand the implications of these findings on patient management and future trial design and treatment selection.

Primary versus acquired epidermal growth factor receptor Thr790Met mutant non-small cell lung cancer: clinical features and prognoses.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify the impact of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutations on clinical characteristics and prognosis. METHODS: Retrospective analyses were conducted on the differences on clinicopathological features and prognosis between primary and acquired T790M mutations. Subgroup analyses were performed for primary T790M coexisting with other mutations. RESULTS: Patients with primary T790M mutations showed a 60.53% (23/38) incidence of concurrent L858R mutations, 18.42% (7/38) for 19del mutations and a 21.05% (8/38) occurrence of brain metastases. Conversely, those with acquired T790M mutations demonstrated respective frequencies of 36.53% (61/167), 58.68% (98/167) and 44.31% (74/167), with all comparisons yielding p < 0.05. The median overall survival differed significantly between the two groups, with a duration of 33 months for patients with primary T790M mutations as compared to 48 months for those with acquired mutations (p = 0.030). Notably, among patients with L858R co-mutations, when treated with third-generation EGFR-TKIs, those with acquired T790M mutations experienced a significantly prolonged median time to treatment failure compared to those with primary mutations (17 months vs. 9 months, p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Patients with primary T790M have unique molecular features and had worse prognosis compared with acquired T790M. Resistance to third-generation EGFR-TKIs seems to be associated with the presence of EGFR co-mutations.

Tumor mutational burden as a predictive biomarker for non-small cell lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors of PD-1/PD-L1.

BACKGROUND: The significant clinical benefits of PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIP) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been widely recognized, emphasizing the urgent need for a reliable biomarker. In this study, we find the remarkable capacity of tumor mutational burden (TMB) to serve as an accessible and streamlined indicator. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We designed a retrospective cohort study, consisting of 600 NSCLC patients treated with ICIP. Association between TMB and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) has been explored. RESULTS: A strong positive correlation between TMB levels and OS, PFS rates, clinical benefit has been found when TMB > = 16(TMB > = 16 mutations/megabase (mut/Mb)). However, when TMB < 16, increasing TMB values did not exhibit a gradual stepwise increase in OS and PFS rates. The median months of OS in the TMB > = 16 and < 16 are 35.58, and 10.71 months respectively with average 12.39 months (p < 0.0001). The median months of PFS in the TMB > = 16 and < 16 are not-obtained, and 2.79 months respectively with an average of 3.32 months (p < 0.0001). The DCR in the TMB > = 16 and < 16 are 71.4% and 44.2% respectively with an average of 47.7% (p < 0.0001). The ORR in the TMB > = 16 and < 16 are 49.4% and 20.8% respectively with an average of 24.5% (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The TMB > = 16 shows significantly associated with optimal ICIP treatment outcomes, including higher patient survival rates, delayed disease progression, and significant clinical benefits. These results present the potential of TMB as a promising biomarker candidate for NSCLC patients undergoing ICIP treatment.

Characteristics and prognosis of EGFR mutations in small cell lung cancer patients in the NGS era.

PURPOSE: Targeted therapy has not been effective for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. Although some studies have reported on EGFR mutations in SCLC, a systematic investigation into the clinical, immunohistochemical, and molecular characteristics and prognosis of EGFR-mutated SCLCs is lacking. METHODS: Fifty-seven SCLC patients underwent next-generation sequencing technology, with 11 in having EGFR mutations (group A) and 46 without (group B). Immunohistochemistry markers were assessed, and the clinical features and first-line treatment outcomes of both groups were analyzed. RESULTS: Group A consisted primarily of non-smokers (63.6%), females (54.5%), and peripheral-type tumors (54.5%), while group B mainly comprised heavy smokers (71.7%), males (84.8%), and central-type tumors (67.4%). Both groups showed similar immunohistochemistry results and had RB1 and TP53 mutations. When treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) plus chemotherapy, group A had a higher treatment response rate with overall response and disease control rates of 80% and 100%, respectively, compared to 57.1% and 100% in group B. Group A also had a significantly longer median progression-free survival (8.20 months, 95% CI 6.91-9.49 months) than group B (2.97 months, 95% CI 2.79-3.15), with a significant difference (P = 0.043). Additionally, the median overall survival was significantly longer in group A (16.70 months, 95% CI 1.20-32.21) than in group B (7.37 months, 95% CI 3.85-10.89) (P = 0.016). CONCLUSION: EGFR-mutated SCLCs occurred more frequently in non-smoking females and were linked to prolonged survival, implying a positive prognostic impact. These SCLCs shared immunohistochemical similarities with conventional SCLCs, and both types had prevalent RB1 and TP53 mutations.

Difficulties on the access to innovative targeted therapies for lung cancer in Spain.

PURPOSE: Spanish Lung Cancer Group (SLCG) conducted a review to analyze the barriers to access to innovative targeted therapies for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in clinical practice in Spain. METHODS: Review all relevant content published on websites of European Commission, European Medicines Agency, and Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Products regarding the authorization and access to oncology treatments. RESULTS: More than 20 targeted therapies are available to treat different molecular alterations in patients with NSCLC. European Commission has approved treatments for genomic alterations involving the following genes: ALK, RET, ROS1, EGFR, BRAF, NTRK, KRAS, MET. However, the availability of these therapies in Spain is not complete, as innovative treatments are not reimbursed or funded late, with only five of these alterations currently covered by National Health System. CONCLUSION: SLCG considers imperative to improve the access in Spain to innovative treatments for NSCLC to reduce inequity across European countries.

Impact of KRASG12D subtype and concurrent pathogenic mutations on advanced non-small cell lung cancer outcomes.

PURPOSE: Mutations in the Kirsten rat sarcoma viral (KRAS) oncogene constitute a significant driver of lung adenocarcinoma, present in 10-40% of patients, which exhibit heterogeneous clinical outcomes, mainly driven by concurrent genetic alterations. However, characterization of KRAS mutational subtypes and their impact on clinical outcomes in Latin America is limited. METHODS: A cohort study was conducted at the National Cancer Institute (INCan) of Mexico. Individuals with advance-staged of adenocarcinoma and KRAS mutations, detected by next-generation sequencing, having undergone at least one line of therapy were included for analysis. Clinical and pathological characteristics were retrieved from institutional database from June 2014 to March 2023. RESULTS: KRAS was identified in fifty-four (15.6%) of 346 patients, among which 50 cases were included for analysis. KRASG12D (n = 16, 32%) and KRASG12C (n = 16, 32%) represented the most prevalent subtypes. KRASG12D mutations were associated with female (p = 0.018), never smokers (p = 0.108), and concurrences with EGFR (25.0% vs. 17.6%, p = 0.124) and CDKN2A (18.8% vs. 14.7%, p = 0.157). KRASG12D patients showed a better ORR (66.6% vs. 30.0%; OR 4.66, 95% CI 1.23-17.60, p = 0.023) and on multivariate analysis was significantly associated with better PFS (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.16-0.80; p = 0.012) and OS (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.08-0.70; p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this study represents the first effort to comprehensively characterize the molecular heterogeneity of KRAS-mutant NSCLC in Latin American patients. Our data reinforce the current view that KRAS-mutated NSCLC is not a single oncogene-driven disease and emphasizes the prognostic impact of diverse molecular profiles in this genomically defined subset of NSCLC. Further validation is warranted in larger multicenter Latin American cohorts to confirm our findings.

Correlation between carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) expression and EGFR mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to investigate the relationship between serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) expression and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Databases such as PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE and Google Scholar were systematically searched to identify studies assessing the association of serum CEA expression with EGFR mutations. Across 19 studies, 4168 patients were included between CEA expression and EGFR mutations odds ratio (OR) conjoint analysis of correlations. RESULTS: Compared with CEA-negative NSCLC, CEA-positive tumors had an increased EGFR mutation rate (OR = 1.85, 95% confidence interval: 1.48-2.32, P < 0.00001). This association was observed in both stage IIIB/IV patients (OR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.18-2.15, P = 0.002) and stage I-IIIA (OR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.01-2.77, P = 0.05) patients. In addition, CEA expression was associated with exon 19 (OR = 1.97, 95% CI: 1.25-3.11, P = 0.003) and exon 21 (OR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.07-2.12, P = 0.02) EGFR mutations. In ADC pathological type had also showed the correlation (OR = 1.84, 95% CI: 1.31-2.57, P = 0.0004). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis indicated that serum CEA expression was associated with EGFR mutations in NSCLC patients. The results of this study suggest that CEA level may play a predictive role in the EGFR mutation status of NSCLC patients. Detecting serum CEA expression levels can give a good suggestion to those patients who are confused about whether to undergo EGFR mutation tests. Moreover, it may help better plan of the follow-up treatment.

Role of miR-424 in the carcinogenesis.

Recent studies have revealed the impact of microRNAs (miRNAs) in the carcinogenic process. miR-424 is a miRNA whose role in this process is being to be identified. Experiments in the ovarian cancer, cervical cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, neuroblastoma, breast cancer, osteosarcoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, prostate cancer, endometrial cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, hemangioma and gastric cancer have reported down-regulation of miR-424. On the other hand, this miRNA has been found to be up-regulated in melanoma, laryngeal and esophageal squamous cell carcinomas, glioma, multiple myeloma and thyroid cancer. Expression of this miRNA is regulated by methylation status of its promoter. Besides, LINC00641, CCAT2, PVT1, LIN00657, LINC00511 and NNT-AS1 are among lncRNAs that act as molecular sponges for miR-424, thus regulating its expression. Moreover, several members of SNHG family of lncRNAs have been found to regulate expression of miR-424. This miRNA is also involved in the regulation of E2F transcription factors. The current review aims at summarization of the role of miR-424 in the process of cancer evolution and its impact on clinical outcome of patients in order to find appropriate markers for malignancies.