Differences in Patterns of Care and Referral Between Proton and Photon Therapy.

Purpose: To report demographic and clinical characteristics of patients who were more likely to receive proton beam therapy (PBT) than photon therapy from facilities with access to proton centers. Materials and Methods: We utilized the national cancer database to identify the facilities with access to PBT between 2004 and 2015 and compared the relative usage of photons and PBT for demographic and clinical scenarios in breast, prostate, and nonsmall cell cancer. Results: In total, 231 facilities with access to proton centers accounted for 168 323 breast, 39 975 lung, and 77 297 prostate cancer patients treated definitively. Proton beam therapy was used in 0.5%, 1.5%, and 8.9% of breast, lung, and prostate cases. Proton beam therapy was correlated with a farther distance traveled and longer start time from diagnosis for each site (P < .05).For breast, demographic correlates of PBT were treatment in the west coast (odds ratio [OR] = 4.81), age <60 (OR = 1.25), white race (OR = 1.94), and metropolitan area (OR = 1.58). Left-sided cancers (OR = 1.28), N2 (OR = 1.71), non-ER+/PR+/Her2Neu- cancers (OR = 1.24), accelerated partial breast irradiation (OR = 1.98), and hypofractionation (OR = 2.35) were predictors of PBT.For nonsmall cell cancer, demographic correlates of PBT were treatment in the south (OR = 2.6), metropolitan area (OR = 1.72), and Medicare insurance (OR = 1.64). Higher comorbid score (OR = 1.36), later year treated (OR = 3.16), and hypofractionation (not SBRT) (OR = 3.7) were predictors of PBT.For prostate, correlates of PBT were treatment in the west coast (OR = 2.48), age <70 (OR = 1.19), white race (OR = 1.41), metropolitan area (OR = 1.25), higher income/education (OR = 1.25), and treatment at an academic center (OR = 33.94). Lower comorbidity score (OR = 1.42), later year treated (OR = 1.37), low-risk disease (OR = 1.45), definitive compared to postoperative (OR = 6.10), and conventional fractionation (OR = 1.64) were predictors of PBT. Conclusion: Even for facilities with established referrals to proton centers, PBT utilization was low; socioeconomic status was potentially a factor. Proton beam therapy was more often used with left-sided breast and low-risk prostate cancers, without a clear clinical pattern in lung cancer.

Utilization Patterns of Single-Fraction and Short-Course Radiotherapeutic Schedules in the Management of Bone Metastases.

Purpose: Bone metastases are common, occurring in 60% to 70% of patients with advanced malignancies. Historically, bone-directed radiation therapy regimens of 30 Gy over 10 fractions were used. However, prospective randomized data suggest equivalent pain relief with shorter-course regimens. The American Society for Radiation Oncology Choosing Wisely Campaign encourages clinicians to consider shorter-course palliative regimens in patients with limited prognosis. A retrospective analysis was performed to assess patterns of short-course and single-fraction radiation therapy during the past 5 years. Methods and Materials: We queried our electronic medical record (MOSAIQ) from 2016 to 2020 for patients with bone metastases who received palliative radiation therapy. Patients receiving >10 fractions or Medicare-approved palliative courses of radiation (30 Gy/10 fractions, 24 Gy/6 fractions, 20 Gy/5 fractions, 8 Gy/1 fraction) were included. Treatment department was defined as academic (n = 2) versus community (n = 12). Short-course treatment was defined as <6 fractions, whereas long-course included patients receiving >10 fractions. Patients were subdivided based on age and disease site. Physicians were grouped according to their year of residency completion. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified predictors of short-course and single-fraction treatment. Results: We identified 1004 patients with 1768 bony metastases meeting inclusion criteria. The spine was the most common site, followed by pelvis/hip, extremity, and other site. Use of short-course treatment increased from 40% in 2016 to 50% in 2020. Single-fraction treatment increased from 7% in 2016 to 11% in 2020. Predictors of shorter courses included treatment at academic centers, more recent treatment, patient age >76 years, and nonspine anatomic site. Predictors of single-fraction treatment included treatment at academic centers, treating physician residency completion after 2010, patient age >76 years, and treatment to extremity or other site. Conclusions: Rates of short-course and single-fraction bone-directed radiation therapy increased within our health system over time. Treatment receipt at academic centers was associated with both short-course and single-fraction regimens. Physicians completing residency after 2010 were more likely to deliver single-fraction therapy.

Validation of the Neoadjuvant Rectal Cancer (NAR) Score for Prognostication Following Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT) for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

PURPOSE: The neoadjuvant rectal cancer (NAR) score is a prognostic tool for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) treated with total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). It has been previously validated as an endpoint that predicts survival more accurately than pathologic complete response (pCR) and is the primary endpoint of the ongoing NRG-GI002 Phase II trial. Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we aimed to validate the NAR score's ability to predict survival in a large hospital-based dataset. METHODS: We queried the NCDB to identify locally advanced rectal cancer patients from 2004 to 2015 that received TNT followed by surgical resection. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves evaluating NAR score and pCR separately. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify factors associated with survival. Multivariate regression was used to evaluate characteristics associated with a favorable (< 14.98) NAR score. RESULTS: From > 264,000 patients diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma in the NCDB, our final cohort yielded 209 patients with a median age of 62 years. Factors associated with worse survival included age > 62 years old (p = 0.04), lower income (p = 0.03), and unfavorable (≥ 14.98) NAR score (p = 0.04). On multivariate regression, tumors with perineural invasion and a higher comorbidity score (> 1) were less likely to have a favorable NAR response (p = 0.01 and p = 0.01). pCR was not associated with improved survival (p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Our study validates the NAR score as a prognostic tool in patients receiving TNT for LARC. Tumors with perineural invasion and patients with a higher comorbidity score had worse NAR scores.

Urachal carcinoma: A novel staging system utilizing the National Cancer Database.

BACKGROUND: Urachal carcinoma (UrC) is a rare, aggressive cancer with a poor prognosis that is frequently diagnosed in advanced stages. Due to its rarity, the current staging systems, namely Sheldon, Mayo, and Ontario were established based on relatively small patient cohorts, necessitating further validation. We used a large patient population from the National Cancer Database to model a novel staging system based on the Tumor (T), Node(N), and Metastasis (M) (TNM) staging system and compared it to established staging systems. METHODS: We identified patients diagnosed with UrC between the years of 2004-2016. To determine median overall survival (OS), a Kaplan-Meier (KM) curve was generated using the Sheldon, Mayo, Ontario, and TNM staging system. A cox proportional-hazards regression model was developed to highlight predictors of overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 626 patients were included in the analysis. The OS for the entire cohort was 58.2 months (50.1-67.8) with survival rates at 12, 24, and 60 months of 83%, 70%, and 49%, respectively (p < 0.0001). As compared to the Sheldon, Mayo, and Ontario staging system, our TNM staging system had a more balanced sample and survival distribution per stage and no overlap among stages on KM survival curves. The Mayo, Ontario, and TNM staging systems were more accurate in terms of stage-survival correlation than the Sheldon staging system (p < 0.05 for all stages). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed novel TNM staging system for UrC has a more balanced sample distribution and a more accurate stage-survival correlation than the traditional Mayo, Sheldon, and Ontario staging systems. It is clinically applicable and enables better risk stratification, prognosis, and therapeutic decision-making.

The prognostic value of KRAS mutation in locally advanced rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of the KRAS proto-oncogene mutation in colorectal cancer has been debated. Herein, we analyzed the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to assess the role of KRAS mutation as a prognostic marker in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). METHODS: We identified LARC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation from 2004-2015 excluding those with stage I/IV disease and unknown KRAS status. Multivariable logistic regression identified variables associated with KRAS positivity. Propensity adjusted univariable and multivariable analyses identified predictors of survival. RESULTS: Of the 784 eligible patients, 506 were KRAS-negative (KRAS -) and 278 were KRAS-positive (KRAS +). Median survival was 63.6 months and 76.3 months for KRAS + and KRAS - patients respectively, with propensity adjusted 3 and 5-year survival of 79.9% vs. 83.6% and 56.7% vs. 61.9% respectively (HR 1.56, p 1.074-2.272). Male sex, no insurance, and KRAS + disease were associated with poorer survival on unadjusted and propensity adjusted multivariable analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis of KRAS + LARC suggest that KRAS + disease is associated with poorer overall survival. Given the inherent limitations of retrospective data, prospective validation is warranted.

Trends in the use of radiation for meningioma across the United States.

PURPOSE: Meningiomas are tumors originating from arachnoid cap cells on the surface of the brain or spinal cord. Treatment differs by grade but can consist of observation, surgery, radiation therapy or both. We utilized the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to compare trends in the use stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in the management of meningioma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We queried the NCDB from 2004-2015 for meningioma patients (grade 1-3) treated with radiation therapy, either SRS or EBRT. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of each treatment and to generate a propensity score. Propensity adjusted Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis and multivariable Cox hazards ratios were used to identify predictors of survival. RESULTS: We identified 5,406 patients with meningioma meeting above criteria with 45%, 44%, and 11% having World Health Organization (WHO) grade 1, 2, and 3 disease, respectively. Median follow up was 43 months. Predictors for SRS were grade 1 disease, distance from treatment facility, and histology. The only predictor of EBRT was grade 3 disease. Treatment year, histology, race and female sex were associated with improved survival. Five- and 10-year survival rates were 89.2% versus 72.6% (p < 0.0001) and 80.3% versus 61.4% (p = 0.29) for SRS and EBRT respectively. After propensity matching 226 pairs were generated. For SRS, 5-year survival was not significantly improved at 88.2% compared with EBRT (p = 0.056). CONCLUSION: In the present analysis, predictors of SRS utilization in management of meningioma include WHO grade 1 disease, distance from treatment facility and histology whereas conventional EBRT utilization was associated with grade 2 and 3 disease. Future studies need to be performed in order to optimize management of atypical and malignant meningioma.

Trends in radiation dose for low grade gliomas across the United States.

PURPOSE: Adjuvant radiation is often used in patients with low grade gliomas with high-risk characteristics with a recommended dose of 45-54 Gy. We used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to see which doses were being used, and if any difference was seen in outcome. METHODS: We queried the NCDB for patients with WHO Grade 2 primary brain tumors treated with surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy. We divided the cohort into dose groups: 45-50 Gy, 50.4-54 Gy, and > 54 Gy. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of low and high dose radiation. Propensity matching was used to account for indication bias. RESULTS: We identified 1437 patients meeting inclusion criteria. Median age was 45 years and 62% of patients were > 40 years old. Nearly half of patients (48%) had astrocytoma subtype and 70% had subtotal resection. The majority of patients (69%) were treated to doses between 50.4 and 54 Gy. Predictors of high dose radiation (> 54 Gy) were increased income, astrocytoma subtype, chemotherapy receipt, and treatment in later year (2014). The main predictors of survival were age > 40, astrocytoma subtype, and insurance type. Patients treated to a dose of > 54 Gy had a median survival of 73.5 months and was not reached in those treated to a lower dose (p = 0.0041). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis shows that 50.4-54 Gy is the most widely used radiation regimen for the adjuvant treatment of low-grade gliomas. There appeared to be no benefit to higher doses, although unreported factors may impact interpretation of the results.

Analysis of Post-operative Adjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Adjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy Outcomes in Non-metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma: an NCDB Review.

BACKGROUND: Each year, approximately 8000 cases of cholangiocarcinoma are recorded in the USA. Surgical resection is considered to be the only curative option. Despite surgery as a curative approach, many patients will require adjuvant therapies in the form of chemotherapy (ChT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT). As such, we sought to analyze outcomes in patients with non-metastatic cholangiocarcinoma receiving adjuvant ChT or CRT following surgical resection. METHODS: We queried the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for patients with a diagnosis of non-metastatic cholangiocarcinoma between the years 2010 and 2015 who underwent adjuvant ChT or CRT following surgery. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using Kaplan Meier method. Cox proportional hazard ratios were used to identify predictors of overall survival, and logistic regression was used to identify predictors of receiving each treatment. RESULTS: A total of 875 patients were identified who met the above eligibility criteria. Of these patients, 818 received adjuvant chemotherapy alone with 57 patients receiving adjuvant chemoradiation therapy. The median OS in patients receiving CRT was 19.8 months versus 11.9 months for ChT (p value < 0.0238). The 1- and 5-year survival rates between ChT and CRT were 50% vs 61% and 6% vs 13%, respectively (hazard ratio 0.7005; 95% CI 0.51-0.97; p value < 0.0294). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest a potential benefit of chemoradiation therapy in the adjuvant setting, although the trends appear to show rare utilization. Given the limitations of our study, prospective corroboration is warranted.

The use of adjuvant radiation therapy in male breast cancer and its impact on outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Male breast cancer (MBC) accounts for 1% of all breast cancers and there is a paucity of data on factors impacting the treatment strategies and outcomes. We sought to use a large national database to examine trends and predictors of the use of adjuvant radiation (Adj-RT), as well as any association with outcome. METHODS: We queried the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for patients with stages I-III MBC treated with surgery (breast conservation surgery-BCS or mastectomy-MS) within 180 days of diagnosis (years 2004-2015). Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of adj-RT receipt. Multivariable Cox regression evaluated predictors of survival. Propensity matching for adj-RT was used to account for indication biases. RESULTS: We identified 6,217 patients meeting the eligibility criteria (1457 BCS vs. 4760 MS). The majority of patients were Caucasian (85%) and in an age range of 50-80 years (74%). Although adj-RT was omitted for 30% of BCS patients, the utilization was higher compared to MS (OR=26, p-value=0.001). The predictors of adj-RT use included African-American race, more advanced stage, higher grade, presence of lymphovascular invasion, and ER/Her-2 positivity for the entire cohort and increased age, urban location and higher income for BCS. Adj-RT was associated with lower mortality in the propensity matched model (overall HR for BCS=0.28, p-value<0.001; overall HR for MS=0.62, p-value=0.001). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that while adj-RT after BCS is associated with decreased mortality in MBC patients, adj-RT is omitted in up to a third of cases of MBC after BCS despite being standard of care.

Time from stereotactic radiosurgery to immunotherapy in patients with melanoma brain metastases and impact on outcome.

BACKGROUND: The role of immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma has expanded over the past decade triggering questions regarding the combination and timing of immunotherapy and radiation for brain metastases. We used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to see if the time from radiation to immunotherapy in patients with melanoma brain metastases had an impact on survival. METHODS: We queried the NCDB from 2010 to 2015 for patients with melanoma brain metastases treated with immunotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was done to determine a timepoint associated with outcome. Cox regression was used to identify predictors of survival. Propensity matching was done to account for indication bias. RESULTS: We identified 247 patients meeting the above criteria. The median patient age was 62 years (27-90) and the vast majority were Caucasian (99%). The median SRS dose was 22 Gy (18-24 Gy).The median time to SRS was 39 days (0-344) and the median time to immunotherapy was 56 days (6-454). The ROC analysis revealed 8 days from SRS to immunotherapy as associated with outcome. Fifty-six patients had immunotherapy prior to SRS, 30 patients had immunotherapy within 0-7 days of SRS, and the remaining 161 had immunotherapy greater than 7 days from SRS. Three year survival rates were 21%, 55%, and 35% for those timeframes, respectively (p = 0.0153). Propensity matching of the 0-7 day and > 7 day groups yielded 28 pairs and Kaplan Meier analysis showed 3 year overall survival of 55% and 35%, in favor of immunotherapy within 7 days of SRS (p = 0.0357). Multivariable Cox regression identified lack of extracranial disease, more recent year of treatment, and time from SRS to immunotherapy of 0-7 days as predictors of improved survival. CONCLUSIONS: Immunotherapy within 7 days of SRS shows a possible association with improve outcomes in patients with brain metastases from melanoma.

Post-Operative Morbidity and Mortality Following Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Versus Conventional Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) (stage II/III) includes preoperative chemoradiation (CRT) followed by resection and adjuvant chemotherapy. Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is a new treatment paradigm that delivers systemic therapy prior to CRT aimed at improving outcomes for high-risk patients. Here we analyzed the national cancer database (NCDB) comparing short-term post-operative outcomes between patients receiving TNT and CRT. METHODS: The NCDB was queried to identify patients with LARC between the 2004 and 2014 treated with TNT or CRT. Primary outcomes included post-operative 30-day mortality and readmissions between TNT and CRT which were analyzed via logistic regression. Secondary outcomes included post-operative length of stay (LOS) and OS which were compared with two-tailed t-test and Kaplan-Meier with log rank testing, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 9066 patients met inclusion criteria with a median age at diagnosis that was 57 years (IQR, 19-65); 62.3% were male and 87.8% white. Neoadjuvant therapy consisted of either standard CRT (97.2%) or TNT (2.8%). Patients treated at academic programs and those with N1 [p < 0.001, OR 2.34, 95%CI 1.71-3.19] or N2 [p < 0.001, OR 3.29, 95%CI 2.19-4.94] disease were associated with increased utilization of TNT. TNT was not significantly associated with either 30-day mortality (p = 1.0) or readmissions (p = 0.82). Further, there was no significant difference identified between CRT and TNT for hospital LOS or OS (p = 0.18). CONCLUSION: This large-scale analysis of patients with LARC demonstrates increased utilization of TNT in patients harboring node-positive disease. Further, TNT does not appear to increase 30-day post-operative mortality, readmissions, or hospital LOS.

Factors associated with treatment receipt and overall survival for patients with locally advanced large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung: A National Cancer Database analysis.

PURPOSE: Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare pulmonary malignancy with clinicopathologic features of both non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Given the paucity of available data regarding LCNEC management, we queried the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to describe trends in management, identify predictors of treatment receipt, and compare outcomes in patients receiving chemotherapy (ChT) and chemoradiotherapy (CRT). METHODS: We identified patients with locally advanced (Stage III) LCNEC of the lung treated with definitive ChT or CRT between the years of 2004-2015. Odds ratios were calculated to determine predictors of CRT receipt. Multivariable cox regression was used to determine predictors of overall survival. RESULTS: Using the above criteria, 5797 patients were identified, 54 % of whom received CRT (n = 3153) while 46 % (n = 2644) received ChT alone. Most patients had T4 (35 %) and N2 (59 %) disease. Median overall survival was 11.9 months (11.3-12.6) in patients receiving ChT compared to 16.1 months (15.4-16.9) in patients receiving CRT (p < 0.0001). Overall survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 50 %, 20 %, and 13 % versus 60 %, 27 %, and 18 %, in patients receiving ChT and CRT, respectively. Older patients and those with higher comorbidity scores were less likely to receive CRT; whereas patients with higher education level, treatment receipt at an academic/research program facility, N2 disease, and later treatment year were more likely to receive CRT. On multivariable analysis, older age, greater comorbidity score, presence of N2 disease, and presence of T4 disease were all associated with decreased OS. CRT receipt was an independent predictor of increased overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Definitive CRT was an independent predictor of increased overall survival in patients with locally advanced LCNEC of the lung. Findings from our study may help guide potential areas of future investigation to help define an ideal treatment approach for LCNEC.

Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for early stage large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung.

AIM: Some patients with early stage large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung are not surgical candidates and will be managed with radiotherapy. We used the national cancer database to identify predictors of stereotactic radiotherapy and compare outcomes. MATERIALS & METHODS: We queried national cancer database for T1-2N0 LCNEC treated with radiation. Logistic regression and Cox regression identified predictors of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) and survival, respectively. RESULTS: We identified 754 patients, with 238 (32%) treated with SABR. Predictors of SABR were distance to facility, no chemotherapy, academic center, T1 and recent year. After propensity matching, median survival was 34.7 months compared with 23.7 months in favor of SABR (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: SABR for LCNEC has increased over time and was associated with improved survival.

Patterns of Care and Outcomes in Verrucous Carcinoma of the Larynx Treated in the Modern Era.

Background: Verrucous carcinoma of the larynx (VCL) is a rare form of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. We analyzed the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to examine national treatment pattern, identify factors associated with primary radiation therapy (RT), and compare outcomes in patients with Tis-T2 N0 VCL treated primary surgery and primary RT. Methods: We accessed the NCDB from 2004 to 2015 for patients with Tis-T2 N0 VCL and recorded the treatment modality employed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors for radiation therapy. Cox regression was used to calculate hazard ratios for survival. A propensity score matched Kaplan-Meier analysis compared primary surgical treatment to definitive radiation. Results: We identified 732 patients with laryngeal verrucous carcinoma from the NCDB. The majority were cTis-T2 (87%) N0 (96%). We identified 286 vs. 110 Tis-T2N0 patients treated primary surgery and with definitive radiation, respectively, for the purpose of this study. Predictors of radiation were treatment at a community center, no insurance, and higher T stage. Cox regression identified increased age, higher comorbidity score, and government insurance as predictive of worse survival. Propensity matching revealed a trend toward worse survival with definitive radiation, with a median survival of 98 months compared to 143 months (p = 0.02). When including only T1-2 lesions, that is, invasive disease, the trend toward increased survival with surgery [98 months vs. 135 months (p = 0.08)] persisted. Conclusion: The results of the present study support the use of surgery in the management of Tis-T2 N0 VCL when organ preservation is possible.

Melanoma brain metastases: is it time to eliminate radiotherapy?

PURPOSE: Immunotherapy has demonstrated efficacy in treatment of intracranial metastasis from melanoma, calling into question the role of intracranial radiotherapy (RT). Herein, we assessed the utilization patterns of intracranial RT in patients with melanoma brain metastasis and compared outcomes in patients treated with immunotherapy alone versus immunotherapy in addition to intracranial RT. METHODS: We queried the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for patients with melanoma brain metastases treated with immunotherapy and intracranial RT or immunotherapy alone. Multivariable logistic regression identified variables associated with increased likelihood of receiving immunotherapy alone. Multivariable Cox regression was used to identify co-variates predictive of overall survival (OS). Propensity matching was used to account for indication bias. RESULTS: We identified 528 and 142 patients that were treated with combination therapy and immunotherapy alone, respectively. Patients with lower comorbidity score were more likely to receive immunotherapy alone. Extracranial disease and treatment at a non-academic center were associated with worse OS. Median OS for all patients was 11.0 months. Treatment with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in addition to immunotherapy was superior to immunotherapy alone, median OS of 19.0 versus 11.5 months (p = 0.006). Whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) in combination with immunotherapy performed worse than immunotherapy alone, median OS of 7.7 versus 11.5 months (p = 0.0255). CONCLUSIONS: For melanoma patients requiring WBRT, immunotherapy alone may be reasonable in asymptomatic patients. For those eligible for SRS, combination therapy may provide better outcomes. Results of ongoing prospective studies will help provide guidance regarding the use of radioimmunotherapy in this population.

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy in early stage squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx: treatment trends and outcomes.

PURPOSE: Definitive radiotherapy remains a primary treatment option for early stage glottic cancer. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has emerged as the standard treatment technique for advanced head and neck cancers, whereas three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) has remained standard for early glottic cancers. We used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to identify predictors of IMRT use and effect on outcome in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We queried the NCDB from 2004-2015 for squamous cell carcinoma of the glottic larynx staged Tis-T2N0 treated with radiation alone. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of IMRT. Cox regression was used to identify factors predictive of overall survival. Propensity matching was conducted to account for indication bias. RESULTS: We identified 15,627 patients, of which 11% received IMRT. IMRT use rose from 2% in 2004 to 16% in 2015. Predictors of IMRT include: increased comorbidity, T2 stage, urban location, chemotherapy, treatment at an academic center, and later treatment year. Predictors of improved survival were female gender, higher income, lower stage, no chemotherapy, academic facility, and more remote year. There was no difference in survival between 3D-CRT and IMRT across all stages. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of IMRT use for early stage glottic laryngeal cancer has increased over time. There was no difference in outcome in patients receiving IMRT versus 3D-CRT across the cohort.

HIV screening in the dental setting in New York State.

While primary care providers in New York State (NYS) are mandated to offer all patients a HIV test, still many NYS residents miss the HIV screening opportunity. To fill the gap, and as the CDC recommends, this study aimed to examine the feasibility of implementing HIV screening in dental setting, identify patient characteristics associated with acceptance of HIV rapid testing, and discuss best practices of HIV screening in dental setting. New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) collaborated with the Northeast/Caribbean AIDS Education and Training Center (NECA AETC) and three dental schools in New York State to offer free HIV screening tests as a component of routine dental care between February 2016 and March 2018. Ten clinics in upstate New York and Long Island participated in the study. HIV screening was performed using the OraQuick™ In-Home HIV Test. 14,887 dental patients were offered HIV screening tests; 9,057 (60.8%) were screened; and one patient (0.011%) was confirmed HIV positive and linked to medical care. Of all dental patients, 33% had never been screened for HIV; and 56% had not had a primary care visit or had not been offered an HIV screening test by primary care providers in the previous 12 months. Multi-level generalized linear modeling analysis indicated that test acceptance was significantly associated with patient's age, race/ethnicity, gender, country of origin, primary payer (or insurance), past primary care visits, past HIV testing experiences, and the poverty level of patient's community. HIV screening is well accepted by dental patients and can be effectively integrated into routine dental care. HIV screening in the dental setting can be a good option for first-time testers, those who have not seen a primary care provider in the last 12 months, and those who have not been offered HIV screening at their last primary care visit.

Trends in Radiation Fractionation for Bone Metastases: A Contemporary Nationwide Analysis.

PURPOSE: Radiation therapy remains an important palliative tool for patients with bone metastases. The guidelines from the American Society for Therapeutic Radiation Oncology recommend the use of fewer fractions based on randomized data. We used the National Cancer Database to examine trends in radiation fractionation for patients with bone metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We queried breast, prostate, and non-small cell lung cancer in the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2015 for patients with bone metastases at the time of diagnosis who received bone-directed radiation therapy of 8 Gy in 1 fraction, 20 Gy to 24 Gy in 5 to 6 fractions, 30 Gy in 10 fractions, or >30 Gy in 10 fractions. We tabulated the baseline characteristics, and a multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of single-fraction treatment. RESULTS: We identified 17,859 patients who met the study criteria. The median patient age was 67 years, and the majority of patients (67%) had primary prostate cancer. Most patients (62%) received spine treatment. Single-fraction treatment increased over time from 3% in 2010 to 7% by 2015. Use of more protracted courses (>30 Gy in 10 fractions) decreased from 34% to 15% over the same interval. The most commonly used regimen (50%-60% of cases) remained 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Predictors of single-fraction treatment included increased age, no systemic therapy, increasing distance from facility, treatment at an academic center, nonspine/nonskull metastasis, and more recent treatment year. CONCLUSIONS: Use of single-fraction radiation for bone metastases has increased steadily but still accounts for <10% of palliative courses. The use of more protracted regimens has decreased significantly, although 30 Gy in 10 fractions remains the most widely used regiment.

Utilization of Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy for Intact Renal Cell Carcinoma: Trends in Treatment and Predictors of Outcome.

PURPOSE: Surgery is the standard-of-care treatment in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC), offering excellent chance of cure. However, there is a subset of patients who are ineligible for surgery and instead manage with ablative therapies, such as stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy (SABR). We used the National Cancer Database to examine trends in the use of SABR for inoperable RCC and identify any predictors of outcome. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We queried the National Cancer Database for patients with unresected RCC between 2004 and 2016 who were treated with SABR. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to determine overall survival. Multivariable Cox regression was used to identify predictors of survival. RESULTS: We identified 347 patients meeting eligibility criteria. Median age was 74, and the majority of patients were clinical stage T1-2 (80%) and N0 (97%). The median tumor size was 3.8 cm (interquartile range [IQR], 2.8-5.2 cm). Six percent of patients received systemic therapy. The median dose of SABR was 45 Gy (IQR, 35-54 Gy) in 3 fractions (IQR, 1-5 fractions). The median follow-up was 36 months (IQR, 1-156 months). Predictors of decreased survival were age >74, larger tumors, and N1 or M1 disease. Median survival across the entire cohort was 58 months. Median survival was 92 months, 88 months, 44 months, and 26 months for primary tumors ≤2.5 cm, 2.6-3.5 cm, 3.5-5.0 cm, and >5.0 cm, respectively (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: SABR is being increasingly used for renal cell carcinoma across the United States with excellent outcomes in smaller tumors.

Liver transplant mortality and morbidity following preoperative radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy (RT) can be used for tumor downstaging and as a bridge to transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but its effect on surgical complications is unknown. Therefore, we investigated post-transplant mortality and acute readmission rates in HCC with and without preoperative RT using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). METHODS: After exclusion, 11,091 transplant patients were analyzed, 165 of whom received RT prior to transplant. Multivariable binomial logistic regression analysis identified characteristics associated with use of RT, and factors associated with increased 30/90-day mortality and 30-day readmission, following propensity matching. RESULTS: Although RT (median 40 Gy in 5 fractions) was more often delivered to larger tumors and advanced stages, it resulted in 59% downstaging rate, 39% pathologic complete response rate, and a median of 4 additional months to transplantation. Crude 30/90-day mortality rates were both 1.2% with preoperative RT, compared to 2.7% and 4.4% without. The 30-day readmission rate was 5.5% with RT and 10.7% without it. Propensity matched analysis demonstrated no statistical differences in 30/90-day mortality and a lower 30-day readmission rate with preoperative RT. Age >58, stage III disease, lack of transarterial chemoembolization, and shorter time to transplant independently predicted higher 90-day mortality. CONCLUSION: Preoperative RT for HCC did not increase postoperative mortality or length of stay following liver transplant.