RÉSUMÉ
PURPOSE: Iatrogenic ureteral strictures (US) after endoscopic treatment for urolithiasis represent a significant healthcare concern. However, high-quality evidence on the risk factors associated with US is currently lacking. We aimed to develop a consensus statement addressing the definition, risk factors, and follow-up management of iatrogenic US after endoscopic treatment for urolithiasis. METHODS: Utilizing a modified Delphi method, a steering committee developed survey statements based on a systematic literature review. Then, a two-round online survey was submitted to 25 experts, offering voting options to assess agreement levels. A consensus panel meeting was held for unresolved statements. The predetermined consensus threshold was set at 70%. RESULTS: The steering committee formulated 73 statements. In the initial survey, consensus was reached on 56 (77%) statements. Following in-depth discussions and refinement of 17 (23%) statements in a consensus meeting, the second survey achieved consensus on 63 (86%) statements. This process underscored agreement on pivotal factors influencing US in endoscopic urolithiasis treatments. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a comprehensive list of categorized risk factors for US following endoscopic urolithiasis treatments. The objectives include enhancing uniformity in research, minimizing redundancy in outcome assessments, and effectively addressing risk factors associated with US. These findings are crucial for designing future clinical trials and guiding endoscopic surgeons in mitigating the risk of US.
Sujet(s)
Méthode Delphi , Obstruction urétérale , Urétéroscopie , Urolithiase , Humains , Urolithiase/chirurgie , Facteurs de risque , Urétéroscopie/effets indésirables , Obstruction urétérale/chirurgie , Obstruction urétérale/étiologie , Sténose pathologique , Complications postopératoires/étiologie , Maladie iatrogène , Internationalité , ConsensusRÉSUMÉ
PURPOSE: We aimed to accurately determine ureteral stricture (US) rates following urolithiasis treatments and their related risk factors. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following the PRISMA guidelines using databases from inception to November 2023. Studies were deemed eligible for analysis if they included ≥ 18 years old patients with urinary lithiasis (Patients) who were subjected to endoscopic treatment (Intervention) with ureteroscopy (URS), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), or shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) (Comparator) to assess the incidence of US (Outcome) in prospective and retrospective studies (Study design). RESULTS: A total of 43 studies were included. The pooled US rate was 1.3% post-SWL and 2.1% post-PCNL. The pooled rate of US post-URS was 1.9% but raised to 2.7% considering the last five years' studies and 4.9% if the stone was impacted. Moreover, the pooled US rate differed if follow-ups were under or over six months. Patients with proximal ureteral stone, preoperative hydronephrosis, intraoperative ureteral perforation, and impacted stones showed higher US risk post-endoscopic intervention with odds ratio of 1.6 (P = 0.05), 2.6 (P = 0.009), 7.1 (P < 0.001), and 7.47 (P = 0.003), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The overall US rate ranges from 0.3 to 4.9%, with an increasing trend in the last few years. It is influenced by type of treatment, stone location and impaction, preoperative hydronephrosis and intraoperative perforation. Future standardized reporting and prospective and more extended follow-up studies might contribute to a better understanding of US risks related to calculi treatment.
Sujet(s)
Lithotritie , Complications postopératoires , Urétéroscopie , Urolithiase , Humains , Urétéroscopie/effets indésirables , Facteurs de risque , Urolithiase/chirurgie , Urolithiase/épidémiologie , Complications postopératoires/épidémiologie , Complications postopératoires/étiologie , Lithotritie/effets indésirables , Lithotritie/méthodes , Sténose pathologique , Néphrolithotomie percutanée/effets indésirables , Néphrolithotomie percutanée/méthodes , Obstruction urétérale/étiologie , Obstruction urétérale/chirurgieSujet(s)
Diverticulite colique/complications , Fistule intestinale/chirurgie , Laparoscopie/effets indésirables , Imagerie optique/méthodes , Maladies du sigmoïde/complications , Côlon sigmoïde/imagerie diagnostique , Côlon sigmoïde/anatomopathologie , Côlon sigmoïde/chirurgie , Fluorescence , Humains , Vert indocyanine/administration et posologie , Fistule intestinale/diagnostic , Fistule intestinale/étiologie , Soins peropératoires/méthodes , Complications peropératoires/étiologie , Complications peropératoires/prévention et contrôle , Laparoscopie/méthodes , Maladies du sigmoïde/diagnostic , Maladies du sigmoïde/chirurgie , Résultat thérapeutique , Uretère/imagerie diagnostique , Vessie urinaireRÉSUMÉ
PURPOSE: Prolonged postoperative incontinence is a major drawback of RRP. Age, scars in the rhabdosphincter, nonnerve sparing surgery and postoperative sphincter insufficiency can cause temporary or definitive urinary incontinence. We believe that sphincter deficiency is the main cause of early incontinence. Urinary leakage results from the shortening of anatomical and functional sphincter length due to caudal retraction of the urethral sphincteric complex and disruption of the median posterior fibrous raphe. We describe a modification of the Walsh RRP that overcomes caudal retraction, reconstructs the posterior fibrous raphe and decreases time to continence. The primary study end point was early continence rate assessment. Long-term continence (1 year) and erectile function assessment were secondary end points. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To avoid caudal retraction of the urethrosphincteric complex, before completing the vesicourethral anastomosis the posterior semicircumference of the sphincter is joined to the residuum of Denonvilliers' fascia and fixed to the posterior bladder wall 1 to 2 cm cranial and dorsal to the new bladder neck. Vesicourethral anastomosis is subsequently performed with care taken not to involve the neurovascular bundles. A total of 161 patients with clinically confined disease underwent modified RRP (group 1). They were compared with a historical series of 50 patients who underwent standard RRP (group 2). Early continence was defined as no pad use but patients using 1 diaper were also considered continent. Continence, assessed prospectively as the number of pads daily, was evaluated 3, 30 and 90 days, and 1 year after catheter removal. The continence state was assessed by a multivariate logistic model. Erectile function was evaluated using the International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire preoperatively and after 18 months in patients younger than 65 years who underwent nerve sparing surgery. RESULTS: In group 1, 116 (72%), 127 (78.8%) and 139 patients (86.3%) were continent 3, 30 and 90 days after catheter removal compared with 7 (14%), 15 (30%) and 23 (46%), respectively, in group 2. One-year continence rates were 96% and 90%, respectively. Erectile function was similar in groups 1 and 2 (46% and 42%, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that continence was significantly influenced by operation type, stage and patient age. CONCLUSIONS: Careful reconstruction of the posterior aspect of the rhabdosphincter markedly shortens time to continence.
Sujet(s)
Prostatectomie/effets indésirables , Prostatectomie/méthodes , Urètre/chirurgie , Incontinence urinaire/étiologie , Incontinence urinaire/prévention et contrôle , Sujet âgé , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Études prospectives , Facteurs temps , MictionRÉSUMÉ
As 27 different names have been proposed for the components of the urethral sphincter, it is difficult to build a clear anatomical model of it. Starting from a review of the literature and from some personal observations of surgical anatomy, our aim is to draw a vision as much organic as possible of the anatomy of the urethral sphincter. The components of the urethral sphincter are: the bladder neck (preprostatic sphincter), the smooth muscle urethral sphincter, the rhabdosphincter and levator ani muscle. Recently the rhabdosphincter has been proposed as a vertical structure that extends from the pelvic cavity (bladder base) to the perineal cavity. It can be round-shaped or omega-shaped. The anterior insertions are along the anterolateral aspect of the prostate (superiorly) and on the perineal fascia (inferiorly). The posterior insertions are on the Denonvilliers fascia and posterior aspect of the prostatic apex (superiorly) and on the central perineal tendon (inferiorly). The rhabdosphincter has strong means of fixations: anteriorly it is fixed to the pubis by the pubo-urethral ligaments, posteriorly it is supported by the medial fibrous raphe of the perineum. The anteromedial fibres of levator ani muscle are involved in the continence mechanism by their strong relation with the rhabdosphincter and the prostate.
Sujet(s)
Prostate/anatomie et histologie , Urètre/anatomie et histologie , Vessie urinaire/anatomie et histologie , Humains , MâleRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: Incontinence is one of the drawbacks of radical prostatectomy. The causes of post-operative incontinence are sphincter deficiency (SD) and bladder dysfunction (BD). SD seems to be the main cause of incontinence and long time to continence. We present a surgical modification of the anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy consisting in the reconstruction of the posterior aspect of the striated urethral sphincter in order to obtain a quick recovery of continence postoperatively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Caudal retraction of the urethro-sphincteric complex after apical dissection of the prostate often occurs. Furthermore posterior fibrous raphe interruption can cause shortening of anatomical and functional urethral length and affect continence. In order to avoid caudal retraction of the sphincteric complex, after completing vesico-urethral anastomosis, the posterior emicircumference of the striated sphincter is fixed to the posterior aspect of the bladder one centimeter cranially and posteriorly to the urethro-vesical anastomosis. The rabdosphincter is sutured separately from the urethro-vesical suturing. This technical modification makes it possible to obtain an anatomical length of the urethra of about a centimeter more than with the standard technique, replacing it in a more anatomical position. Furthermore, this technique provides the new posterior platform for the urethro-sphincteric complex. Twenty-four patients with clinical organ confined disease and age range 54-74 years (mean 64 years) underwent Walsh's anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy with reconstruction of the rabdosphincter (group A). Catheter was removed 7 to 11 days postoperatively. Early continence was assessed objectively with the number of pads per day as follows: 0-1 mini pad = continent; 1-2 pads per day = mild incontinence; 2 or more pads per day = severe incontinence. Continence was evaluated at 3 days and one month after catheter removal. Group A compared to 21 patients (group B) who underwent standard anatomical RPP (historical control group). RESULTS: In group A 16/24 patients (66.7%) and 19/24 patients (79.2%) were continent respectively at three days after removal of the catheter and after one month; mild incontinence (1-2 pads/day) was present in 6/24 patients (25%) and 3/24 (12.5%) respectively, 2/24 patients (8.3%) suffered from severe incontinence after 3 days and one month. In group B 7/21 patients (33%) were continent at hospital discharge, 11/21 (52%) after one month. CONCLUSIONS: Careful reconstruction of the posterior aspects of the rabdosphincter shortens time to continence after RRP.