Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrer
1.
Sex Health ; 17(5): 444-452, 2020 11.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33176905

RÉSUMÉ

Background Reducing the number of new acute hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections to zero by 2022 is an important goal in the Netherlands. Free HBV vaccination is available for population groups at higher risk of infection, including men who have sex with men (MSM). Identifying correlates of HBV vaccination among MSM can guide the development of health promotion interventions to increase coverage of HBV vaccination. METHODS: We assessed factors associated with the HBV vaccination status of 4270 MSM in the Netherlands. Data were collected through the 2018 online Men & Sexuality survey. RESULTS: Multinomial regression analysis showed that lower education level, having never tested for HIV, not recently diagnosed with a sexually transmissible infection, recently having had sex abroad and unknown HBV testing status were associated with higher odds of being unvaccinated as opposed to fully vaccinated. Living in Amsterdam and testing HBV negative were associated with lower odds of being unvaccinated as opposed to fully vaccinated. Age (25-39 years vs younger ages), living in Amsterdam and using pre-exposure prophylaxis decreased the odds to be partly vaccinated as opposed to fully vaccinated; having a migration background increased these odds. CONCLUSIONS: HBV vaccination rates among MSM will not reduce HBV transmission to zero. HBV promotion should focus on MSM outside of Amsterdam who are likely less connected with sexual health services and may be at lower (perceived) risk. The factors identified related to HBV vaccination status provide guidance for health promotion interventions to increase uptake and vaccination completion among MSM.


Sujet(s)
Vaccins anti-hépatite B/administration et posologie , Hépatite B/prévention et contrôle , Homosexualité masculine , Minorités sexuelles , Couverture vaccinale/statistiques et données numériques , Adolescent , Adulte , Études transversales , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Pays-Bas/épidémiologie , Autorapport , Jeune adulte
2.
AIDS Care ; 32(sup2): 170-176, 2020 05.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32156157

RÉSUMÉ

The expanding HIV risk reduction toolkit increases options for men who have sex men (MSM), but increasing options in combination with different preferences may complicate promoting risk reduction. To investigate what strategies MSM prefer, data of 3310 participants in the online survey "Men & Sexuality" (Median age = 37 years, 320 (9.7%) HIV positive) was analysed. Questions assessed attitudes towards HIV risk reduction strategies. Participants had the most positive attitudes regarding PrEP and HIV testing, while withdrawal and strategic positioning were least preferred (all p's < .001). Condoms were seen as acceptable to partners and effective but scored low on sexual pleasure. HIV-positive participants were more negative about condoms and more positive about viral load sorting than HIV-negative participants (F(12,3297) = 5.09, p < .001, [Formula: see text] = .02). Findings highlight a preference for HIV risk reduction strategies (PrEP and HIV testing) that do not diminish sexual pleasure and can be applied independent of sexual partners. A serological divide was apparent: HIV-negative MSM were less negative about condoms than HIV-positive MSM, suggesting that condom promotion remains a viable strategy for HIV-negative MSM. Taken together, results indicate a need for personalized approaches to the promotion of HIV risk reduction strategies, accounting for individual preferences and strategy effectiveness.


Sujet(s)
Préservatifs masculins/statistiques et données numériques , Infections à VIH/prévention et contrôle , Sérotriage/statistiques et données numériques , Connaissances, attitudes et pratiques en santé , Homosexualité masculine/psychologie , Comportement de réduction des risques , Rapports sexuels non protégés/prévention et contrôle , Adolescent , Adulte , Infections à VIH/psychologie , Homosexualité masculine/statistiques et données numériques , Humains , Mâle , Rapports sexuels protégés/statistiques et données numériques , Comportement sexuel , Partenaire sexuel , Enquêtes et questionnaires , Charge virale
3.
Obes Rev ; 18(4): 450-459, 2017 04.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28187246

RÉSUMÉ

Weight loss interventions are delivered through various mediums including, increasingly, mobile phones. This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses whether interventions delivered via mobile phones reduce body weight and which intervention characteristics are associated with efficacy. The study included randomised controlled trials assessing the efficacy of weight loss interventions delivered via mobile phones. A meta-analysis to test intervention efficacy was performed, and subgroup analyses were conducted to determine whether interventions' delivery mode(s), inclusion of personal contact, duration and interaction frequency improve efficacy. Pooled body weight reduction (d = -0.23; 95% confidence interval = -0.38, -0.08) was significant. Interventions delivered via other modes in addition to the mobile phone were associated with weight reduction. Personal contact and more frequent interactions in interventions were also associated with greater weight reduction. In conclusion, the current body of evidence shows that interventions delivered via mobile phones produce a modest reduction in body weight when combined with other delivery modes. Delivering interventions with frequent and personal interactions may in particular benefit weight loss results.


Sujet(s)
Téléphones portables/statistiques et données numériques , Obésité/prévention et contrôle , Obésité/thérapie , Prévention primaire , Comportement en matière de santé , Humains , Applications mobiles/statistiques et données numériques , Obésité/psychologie , Prévention primaire/instrumentation , Prévention primaire/méthodes , Essais contrôlés randomisés comme sujet , Envoi de messages textuels , Facteurs temps , Perte de poids/physiologie
4.
Sex Transm Infect ; 84(6): 463-7, 2008 Nov.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19028948

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVES: To assess the extent to which sexual risk-taking among men who have sex with men (MSM) is influenced by their sexual desires, as reflected in sexual sensation seeking, and to establish whether men's sexual self-control moderates the influence of sexual sensation seeking. METHODS: An online survey in the Netherlands recruited 1613 MSM; 1129 men who had sex with casual partners and reported full data were included in this study. Potential sexual risk-taking in the preceding 12 months was indexed by number of casual partners (<10 vs > or =10), unprotected anal intercourse with casual partners (UAI-C; no vs yes) and sexually transmitted infections (no vs yes). RESULTS: Potential sexual risk-taking with casual partners was highly prevalent in this online sample of MSM; 51.0% had 10 or more casual sex partners, 38.8% had engaged in UAI-C and 22.9% reported having had a sexually transmitted disease. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that sexual sensation seeking was significantly related to more risk-taking according to each outcome variable, while all effects of sexual self-control were significantly protective. As expected, sexual self-control attenuated the effects of high sexual sensation seeking on UAI-C, but not on numbers of partners and infection with a sexually transmitted infection. CONCLUSIONS: Although MSM who are higher in sexual sensation seeking are more likely to engage in sexual risk-taking, some men successfully self-regulate the influence of their sexual desires on UAI-C. While men high in sexual self-control may spontaneously control their sexual desires, men low in sexual self-control may benefit from a generation of prevention tools that promote planning ahead of time.


Sujet(s)
Homosexualité masculine/psychologie , Inhibition psychologique , Libido , Rapports sexuels non protégés/psychologie , Adulte , Études transversales , Humains , Mâle , Prise de risque , Partenaire sexuel
5.
HIV Med ; 9 Suppl 2: 20-2, 2008 Jul.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18557865

RÉSUMÉ

To contribute to the evidence-based understanding of the psychosocial factors that influence individuals' uptake of testing for HIV, we assessed and synthesized the pertinent published literature in the fields of public health, behavioural medicine, and (health) psychology. Although the evidence base appears too limited to allow firm conclusions and definition on psychological barriers to HIV testing in high-income countries, we identified convergent themes from the available studies. Testing for HIV seems to be more likely when individuals perceive that they have been at risk, though this association is not perfectly observed. Fear of the consequences of testing positive -mainly worries related to discrimination and rejection - also hinders HIV testing. Finally, individuals appear more likely to test for HIV when they perceive more benefits from testing. The perspective of targeted individuals, in particular the social connotations and consequences of HIV diagnoses, is crucial to understand testing decisions.


Sujet(s)
Sérodiagnostic du SIDA/psychologie , Infections à VIH/psychologie , VIH-1 (Virus de l'Immunodéficience Humaine de type 1) , Dépistage de masse/psychologie , Assistance/normes , Médecine factuelle , Femelle , Infections à VIH/diagnostic , Infections à VIH/transmission , Connaissances, attitudes et pratiques en santé , Accessibilité des services de santé , Humains , Mâle , Facteurs de risque , Révélation de soi
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE