Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrer
Plus de filtres










Base de données
Gamme d'année
1.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0301767, 2024.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38758936

RÉSUMÉ

The primary objective of this study was to isolate bacteria from diabetic foot ulcers and subsequently assess their antibiotic resistance capabilities. Seventy-five patients diagnosed with diabetic foot ulcers were investigated. A number of these patients (97.33%) had type 2 diabetes, with a significant proportion of them having been diagnosed for 1-5 years (29.33%). Notably, a substantial number of these individuals were on insulin usage (78.66%). Among the patients under examination, 49.33% reported having no use of tobacco products, alcohol, or betel leaf. The ulcers analyzed in this study were classified into grades 1-5 according to the Wagner scale. Wagner grade 2 diabetic foot ulcers had the highest number of culture-positive patients, at 33.33%. Pus samples collected from patients were cultured on selective media, and bacterial identity was confirmed by biochemical tests and polymerase chain reaction. A total of 141 isolates were isolated. Among the isolates, 82.97% gram-negative bacteria and 17.02% gram-positive bacteria were detected. Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most common isolate. Proteus spp., Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus were also detected. Approximately 61.33% of the ulcers exhibited were polybacterial. In this study, it was observed that all bacterial isolates, except for Proteus spp., were primarily detected in patients classified under Wagner's grade 2. Moreover, antibiotic susceptibility was also tested on these 141 isolates. Among them, Escherichia coli showed the highest multidrug resistance, 81.81%. Most of the gram-negative bacteria were resistant to ampicillin. All of the gram-negative isolates exhibited high levels of susceptibility to piperacillin-tazobactam, and these levels were Klebsiella pneumoniae (97.56%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (95.24%), Escherichia coli (81.82%), and Proteus spp. (80%). On the other hand, gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus mostly showed sensitivity towards vancomycin and norfloxacin (79.17%).


Sujet(s)
Antibactériens , Pied diabétique , Tests de sensibilité microbienne , Humains , Pied diabétique/microbiologie , Pied diabétique/traitement médicamenteux , Mâle , Femelle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Antibactériens/usage thérapeutique , Antibactériens/pharmacologie , Bangladesh/épidémiologie , Sujet âgé , Adulte , Résistance bactérienne aux médicaments , Bactéries à Gram négatif/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Bactéries à Gram négatif/isolement et purification , Bactéries à Gram positif/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Bactéries à Gram positif/isolement et purification , Escherichia coli/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Escherichia coli/isolement et purification , Diabète de type 2/microbiologie , Diabète de type 2/complications , Diabète de type 2/traitement médicamenteux , Staphylococcus aureus/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Staphylococcus aureus/isolement et purification
2.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 7787, 2023 05 13.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37179424

RÉSUMÉ

In Bangladesh cosmetics are being produced disregarding the Good Manufacturing Practices. So, this study aimed to test the level and nature of bacterial contamination of such cosmetics. A total of 27 cosmetics comprising eight lipsticks, nine powders, and ten creams were bought from New Market and Tejgaon areas of Dhaka city and tested. Bacteria was detected in 85.2% of samples. Majority of the samples (77.8%) exceeded the limit given by the Bangladesh Standards and Testing Institution (BSTI), Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Both Gram-negative (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Salmonella spp.) and Gram-positive bacteria (species of Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, Bacillus and Listeria monocytogenes) were identified. Hemolysis was observed in 66.7% Gram-positive and 25% Gram-negative bacteria. Multidrug resistance was tested in 165 randomly selected isolates. Every species of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria exhibited varying levels of multidrug resistance. The highest levels of antibiotic resistance were in broad-spectrum antibiotics (ampicillin, azithromycin, cefepime, ciprofloxacin and meropenem) and narrow-spectrum Gram-negative antibiotics (aztreonam and colistin). Multidrug resistance was 12-78% in Gram-negative bacteria and 12-100% in Gram-positive bacteria. Coagulase and DNase were identified in 97.5% and 5.1% of Staphylococcus aureus isolates respectively. Our findings indicate that these cosmetics pose a risk to the public's health.


Sujet(s)
Antibactériens , Bactéries à Gram négatif , Antibactériens/pharmacologie , Antibactériens/usage thérapeutique , Bactéries à Gram positif , Charge bactérienne , Bangladesh , Bactéries , Multirésistance aux médicaments , Tests de sensibilité microbienne , Résistance bactérienne aux médicaments
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE