RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Since the primary goal of cleft lip repair is to achieve a symmetrical, aesthetic lip, several surgical techniques have been utilized. Accordingly, in this study, a unilateral cleft lip was surgically repaired using two techniques: modified Millard's and Fisher's techniques. PURPOSE: This study was designed to compare the vermillion symmetry and scar quality in the surgical management of patients with unilateral incomplete cleft lip using the modified Millard's and Fisher's techniques. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, AND SAMPLE: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled clinical study. The study involved 20 patients selected from the Department of Plastic Pediatric Surgery at the Specialized Pediatric Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University. The patients included in the study were aged between 2 and 6 months old, had a primary nonsyndromic unilateral incomplete cleft lip, and had no other associated anomalies. PREDICTOR VARIABLE: The predictor variable was operative management of the cleft lip, and subjects were randomly assigned to either the modified Millard or Fisher techniques. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLES: The primary outcome, vermillion symmetry, was evaluated by computerized photogrammetric lip analysis with Image J software. Additionally, scar quality, considered a secondary outcome, was assessed with the Vancouver Scar Scale and the Image J software. Every measurement was meticulously recorded in millimeters. COVARIATES: Age, sex, and cleft side were considered. ANALYSES: Descriptive and analytic statistics were computed. Statistical significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: The study comprised 20 children (12 males and 8 females), with a mean age of 140.5 ± 23.7 days in the Fisher's group and 137.4 ± 25.6 days in the modified Millard's group (P = .8). No statistically significant differences (P = .6) were found in vermillion height and width between both groups at 1 week, 3 months, and 6 months. Similarly, there were no statistically significant differences (P = .4) between both groups in terms of scar length and width at the 3- and 6-month follow-up periods. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: This study found no statistically significant differences in vermillion symmetry and scar quality between the two cleft lip repair techniques. Notably, one patient in the modified Millard group exhibited a notch on the vermillion border, which was not statistically significant.
Sujet(s)
Cicatrice , Bec-de-lièvre , Lèvre , , Humains , Bec-de-lièvre/chirurgie , Femelle , Mâle , Études prospectives , Lèvre/chirurgie , Lèvre/anatomopathologie , Nourrisson , /méthodes , Photogrammétrie/méthodes , Résultat thérapeutique , Études de suivi , EsthétiqueRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: The best approach to maxillary reconstruction with negative impact on the patient's quality of life (QOL) remains the subject of debate. PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate the QOL outcomes following maxillary reconstruction using a scapular-free flap, with and without the computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technique. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial was performed following the CONSORT checklist. To be included, patients suffering from maxillary defects without previous surgery or lymph node involvement were selected. Patients with poor oncological prognosis, deficient performance status, preoperative chemotherapy, or radiotherapy, besides vascular contraindications, were excluded. PREDICTOR VARIABLE: The predictor variable was the reconstruction technique, grouped into two equal categories. Patients were randomly assigned to reconstruction with a scapular-free flap, with the control group not utilizing a guide and the study group utilizing a CAD/CAM-customized guide. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE: The primary outcome variable was the various domains of QOL, measured using the University of Washington Quality of Life score, 12 months after reconstruction. COVARIATES: Age; sex; scapular flap side; and maxillary defect tumour type, histopathology, side, length, class, sagittal, and axial differential areas were considered. ANALYSES: Shapiro-Wilk and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests were performed for normality. For comparisons between the two groups, Student's t-test and Mann-Whitney test were used. The category variables were compared using the χ2 test. P ≤ .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The sample was composed of twenty-two eligible patients, eleven in each group. The mean age of the control group was (50.09 ± 17.14) years, and 45.45% were male, while in the study group, the mean age was (48.36 ± 14.14) years, with 36.36% male. All the patients were evaluated, showing statistically significant differences between control and study groups in terms of pain, appearance, chewing, swallowing, speech, and shoulder (P ≤ .05), indicating that the scapular-free flap with a CAD/CAM osteotomy guide had improved the patient's QOL. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: The findings of this study indicate that virtual surgical planning with a CAD/CAM customized osteotomy guide using a scapular-free flap can improve QOL in maxillary reconstruction in terms of pain, appearance, chewing and swallowing food, pronouncing words, and shoulder QOL outcomes.
Sujet(s)
Lambeaux tissulaires libres , Maxillaire , , Qualité de vie , Scapula , Humains , Mâle , Femelle , Scapula/chirurgie , Scapula/transplantation , Études prospectives , /méthodes , Adulte d'âge moyen , Maxillaire/chirurgie , Adulte , Chirurgie assistée par ordinateur/méthodes , Tumeurs du maxillaire supérieur/chirurgie , Conception assistée par ordinateur , Sujet âgéRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of the maxillary defects following tumor ablation remains to be a challenge for surgeons. Virtual surgical planning (VSP), intraoperative cutting guides and stereolithographic models provides the head and neck reconstructive surgeon with powerful tools for complex reconstruction planning. Despite its use in fibular osteocutaneous reconstruction, application to the scapular free flap has not been as widely reported. The aim of this study was to compare aesthetic results and operation time of free scapular flap, with and without computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) customized osteotomy guide, for reconstruction of maxillary defects. METHODS: In this prospective randomized controlled clinical trial study, we randomly assigned 22 patients with maxillary defects who were scheduled to undergo maxillary reconstruction with either free scapular flap with CAD/CAM customized osteotomy guide; study group (n = 11) or free scapular flap without CAD/CAM customized osteotomy guide; control group (n = 11). All patients were followed up for 3 months. The aesthetic outcome, operation and ischemic times were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: Aesthetic outcomes were evaluated objectively by means of differential surface area (sagittal and axial) measurement, which showed improved aesthetic outcome (contour symmetry) in the study group with a mean of (241.39 ± 113.74 mm2), compared to patients in control group with a mean of (358.70 ± 143.99 mm2). There were significant differences between the two groups (P < 0.05). Aesthetic outcomes were also evaluated subjectively by means of visual analogue scale (VAS) and patient's satisfaction score (PSS). The postoperative aesthetic appearance was better in the study group with more patients satisfied than that in control group and there were statistically significant differences (P = 0.039). The mean total operative time was 678.81 min and 777.18 min in the study group and control group respectively (P < 0.05) and the mean ischemia time was 133.18 min and 195.72 min for study group and control group respectively (P < 0.05). The ischemia time and total operative time were shorter in the study group compared to those in the control group and there were no flap losses in both groups. CONCLUSION: The use of CAD/CAM prefabricated cutting guides facilitates scapular flap molding and placement, minimizes ischemic time and operating time as well as improves aesthetic outcomes. Trial registration This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03757286. Registration date: 28/11/2018.
Sujet(s)
Tumeurs du maxillaire supérieur , , Humains , Conception assistée par ordinateur , Esthétique , Ischémie , Ostéotomie , /méthodes , Chirurgie assistée par ordinateur , Lambeaux chirurgicaux , Études prospectives , Tumeurs du maxillaire supérieur/chirurgieRÉSUMÉ
Background: Odontogenic tumors (OTs) are considered important among oral lesions because of their clinicopathological heterogeneity and variable biological behavior. The purpose of this retrospective cross-sectional study was to evaluate the frequency and distribution of different types of odontogenic tumors based on the current 2017 WHO Classification of Head and Neck Tumors over a period of 5 years. This was achieved by reviewing the records of Cairo's educational hospitals and institutions and comparing the results with findings in the literature. Material and Methods: The records of patients diagnosed with odontogenic tumors were obtained from six educational hospitals and a single institute in Cairo which included: Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University; General Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University; Oral Pathology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University; Eldemerdash Hospital, Ain Shams University; El-Sayed Galal Hospital, Al-Azhar University; Ahmed Maher Teaching Hospital and National Cancer Institute. These records were reviewed over a 5-year (2014-2018) period and the odontogenic tumors were investigated for frequency, age, gender and site. The data were recorded, then analyzed using SPSS software. Results: Intraosseous (central) odontogenic tumors constituted 2.56% of all 8974 registered oral and maxillofacial biopsies. A total of 230 cases of OTs were collected and reviewed. Of these, 97.8% were benign and 2.17% were malignant. The mandible was the most commonly affected anatomic location. Ameloblastoma, with a predilection for the posterior mandible, was the most frequent odontogenic tumor (55.65%), followed by cemento-ossifying fibroma (14.78%) and odontoma (9.13%). Females were more commonly affected than males. Most of the patients were in the third and fourth decades of life. There were no peripheral odontogenic tumors diagnosed in this period. Conclusions: Some similarities and differences between our findings and those of previous studies of various populations were witnessed. OTs may greatly diverge according to the version of the classification used and by the sample size of the study. Retrospective analysis of the relative frequency of OTs in different countries will be helpful in enhancing the understanding of OTs, which is important for both oral maxillofacial surgeons and pathologists.(AU)