Are hand biomechanics affected following radial forearm flap harvest? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Donor site morbidity following radial forearm flap (RFF) harvest remains a controversial issue. The aim of this meta-analysis was to answer the question "Are the range of wrist movements (range of motion, ROM) and hand strength affected after RFF harvesting?" The PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library electronic databases were systematically searched (to December 2019). Self-controlled studies evaluating hand biomechanics after RFF harvest were included. Weighted mean differences with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the random-effects model. The outcome variables were ROM, forearm movements, grip, and pinch strengths. Thirteen studies involving a total of 335 patients were included. With the exception of grip strength and supination, which showed statistically significant reductions of about 2.40 kg and 2.86° (P < 0.05), all other ROM, forearm movements, and pinch strengths showed an insignificant difference when the operated hand was compared to the non-operated hand (P > 0.05). Regression analysis showed that the method of donor site closure and size of the donor site defect had an insignificant impact on hand biomechanics. This study confirms the lack of discernible biomechanical morbidity after RFF transfer. The minimal reduction in hand biomechanics after RFF is considered to be clinically negligible.

Effect of third molars in the line of mandibular angle fractures on postoperative complications: systematic review and meta-analysis.

The aim of this systematic review was to verify whether the presence of a lower third molar in the mandibular angle fracture line is associated with postoperative complications. An electronic survey was conducted in five databases. Eligibility criteria included observational and experimental studies that evaluated the association between the presence of the lower third molar in the fracture line of mandibular angle fractures and possible postoperative complications, including infection, paresthesia, necessity of plate removal, temporomandibular joint disorders, malocclusion, dehiscence, and non-union. Thirty-four papers were included in the qualitative analysis and 26 of those in the meta-analysis. The risk of bias of observational studies was assessed by Newcastle-Ottawa scale and of the clinical trials by Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool. Absence of the third molar was associated with a lower chance of postoperative infection in angle fractures compared to presence of the tooth (odds ratio 0.55, 95% confidence interval 0.34-0.88). No statistically significant difference between the groups was found for the other outcomes evaluated. The findings of this systematic review suggest that the absence of the third molar in the mandibular angle fracture line is associated with a lower postoperative infection rate when compared to angle fractures with a third molar present.