[Translated article] Pericapsular nerves block (PENG) is an effective and safe alternative for postoperative pain management after primary total hip arthroplasty: A randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain after total hip arthroplasty can affect postoperative rehabilitation and delay hospital discharge. The objective of this study is to compare pericapsular nerves group (PENG) block with pericapsular infiltration (PAI) and plexus nerve block (PNB) for postoperative pain management, response to physical therapy, opioid consumption, and length of hospital stay after a primary total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: Randomised clinical trial of parallel and blinded groups was performed. Sixty patients who underwent elective THA between December 2018 and July 2020 were randomised into the different groups (PENG, PAI and PNB). The visual analogue scale was used to assess pain; and motor function was measured with the Bromage scale. We also record opioid usage, length of hospital stay, and related medical complications. RESULTS: Pain level at discharge was similar in all groups. Hospital stay was 1 day shorter in the PENG group (p<0.001) and they also had lower opioid consumption (p=0.044). Optimal motor recovery was similar in the groups (p=0.678). Pain control when performing physical therapy was better in the PENG group (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: PENG block is an effective and safe alternative for patients undergoing THA as it reduces opioid consumption and hospital stay compared to other analgesic methods.

Pericapsular nerves block (PENG) is an effective and safe alternative for postoperative pain management after primary total hip arthroplasty: A randomized clinical trial. / El bloqueo de nervios pericapsulares (PENG) es una alternativa efectiva y segura para el manejo del dolor postoperatorio después de una artroplastia total de cadera primaria: ensayo clínico aleatorizado.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain after total hip arthroplasty can affect postoperative rehabilitation and delay hospital discharge. The objective of this study is to compare pericapsular nerves group (PENG) block with pericapsular infiltration (PAI) and plexus nerve block (PNB) for postoperative pain management, response to physical therapy, opioid consumption, and length of hospital stay after a primary total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: Randomized clinical trial of parallel and blinded groups was performed. Sixty patients who underwent elective THA between December 2018 and July 2020 were randomized into the different groups (PENG, PAI and PNB). The visual analog scale was used to assess pain; and motor function was measured with the Bromage scale. We also record opioid usage, length of hospital stay, and related medical complications. RESULTS: Pain level at discharge was similar in all groups. Hospital stay was 1 day shorter in the PENG group (p<0.001) and they also had lower opioid consumption (p=0.044). Optimal motor recovery was similar in the groups (p=0.678). Pain control when performing physical therapy was better in the PENG group (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: PENG block is an effective and safe alternative for patients undergoing THA as it reduces opioid consumption and hospital stay compared to other analgesic methods.

[Lumbar plexus nerve block provides better analgesic management than periarticular infiltration in primary total hip arthroplasty. Comparative, prospective, and single-blind clinical trial]. / El bloqueo nervioso del plexo lumbar proporciona un mejor manejo analgésico que la infiltración periarticular en artroplastía total primaria de cadera. Ensayo clínico comparativo, prospectivo y simple ciego.

INTRODUCTION: joint replacement is a highly effective intervention that significantly improves the patient's quality of life, relieves symptoms, restores joint function, and improves mobility and independence. The optimal pain control after total hip replacement has become an important goal of postoperative management. The purpose of this paper is to compare periarticular infiltration (PAI) and lumbar plexus nerve block (LPNB) for the management of post-operative pain in primary total hip arthroplasty because we believe that LPNB provides better analgesic management and lower opioid consumption. We evaluated the opioid usage during hospitalization and the complications derived from either technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS: we randomized 45 patients who underwent elective total hip arthroplasty between January 2019 and January 2020. Two groups were evaluated based on the association of PAI or LPNB. Both as part of a multimodal analgesic regimen. RESULTS: a total of 45 patients were evaluated (22 PAI group, 23 LPNB group). Block group required less opioid administration (p = 0.069). Most of the patients in both groups reported mild/moderate pain. The LPNB group had lower pain scale with physiotherapy. We did not have complications derived from either technique. CONCLUSION: lumbar plexus nerve block (LPNB) in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty provides better pain management and reduced opioid consumption compared to PAI. The performance of this technique does not delay the beginning of physiotherapy and there were not any issues with the patient's recovery.

INTRODUCCIÓN: la artroplastía es una intervención altamente eficaz que mejora de manera significativa la calidad de vida del paciente, alivia los síntomas, restaura la función articular y mejora la movilidad e independencia. El control óptimo del dolor después de la artroplastía total de cadera se ha convertido en un objetivo importante del tratamiento postoperatorio. El propósito de este trabajo es comparar la infiltración periarticular (IPA) y el bloqueo nervioso del plexo lumbar (BNPL) para el manejo del dolor postoperatorio en la artroplastía total de cadera primaria, ya que creemos que la BNPL proporciona mejor manejo analgésico y menor consumo de opioides. Se evaluó el uso de opioides durante la hospitalización y las complicaciones derivadas de cada técnica. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: fueron aleatorizados 45 pacientes tratados con artroplastía total de cadera electiva entre Enero de 2019 y Enero de 2020 en dos grupos: IPA o BNPL. Ambos como parte de un régimen analgésico multimodal. RESULTADOS: veintidós en el grupo IPA y 23 en el grupo BNPL. El grupo de bloqueo requirió menos administración de opioides (p = 0.069). La mayoría de los pacientes de ambos grupos reportaron dolor leve/moderado. El grupo de BNPL tuvo menor escala de dolor al realizar fisioterapia. No tuvimos complicaciones derivadas de ninguna de las técnicas analgésicas. CONCLUSIÓN: el BNPL en pacientes sometidos a artroplastía total de cadera proporciona mejor manejo del dolor y una reducción del consumo de opioides en el postoperatorio en comparación con la IPA. La realización de esta técnica no retrasa el inicio de la fisioterapia y no hubo problemas con la recuperación del paciente.

[Continuous vs. intermitent intravenous analgesia for primary total knee replacement: analysis of the quality of the pain control, hospital stay and costs]. / Analgesia endovenosa continua versus analgesia endovenosa intermitente para reemplazo total de rodilla primario: análisis de la calidad analgésica, tiempo de hospitalización y costos económicos.

BACKGROUND: The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) defines pain as an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage. Total knee arthroplasty is one of the orthopedic surgeries that manifests more pain in the first 24-48 hours, needing a multimodal analgesic therapy. The objective of this work is to compare two different intravenous analgesic modes applied to patients undergoing a primary total knee arthroplasty, analyzing the quality of pain control, hospital stay and costs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Simple blind, comparative and prospective study comprised of 42 patients operated of total knee arthroplasty secondary to degenerative arthritis in the period between May 2016 and May 2017. RESULTS: The distribution of pain showed significant differences (p 0.0401) between both groups, indicating that the application of continuous pump for analgesia controls this symptom early. The hospital stay, on average, was different in the groups (p = 0.001), estimating about 15 hours less following the use of continuous pump. This strategy is globally more economic. DISCUSSION: The continuous infusion pump of analgesia compared with intermittent formal intravenous regimen showed better control of pain, decreasing the perception of pain by the patient, bettering the tolerance to physical therapy and reducing, on average, 15 hours of hospital stay, and thus, the final costs of the surgery.

INTRODUCCIÓN: La Asociación Internacional para el Estudio del Dolor (IASP, por sus siglas en inglés) define el dolor como una experiencia sensorial y emocional desagradable asociada a un daño tisular real o potencial. La artroplastía total de rodilla es una de las cirugías ortopédicas que cursa con más dolor en las primeras 24-48 horas, por lo que precisa de una terapia multimodal de analgesia. El objetivo de este trabajo es comparar dos modos analgésicos endovenosos diferentes aplicados a pacientes sometidos a cirugía de artroplastía total de rodilla primaria, analizando la calidad analgésica, el tiempo de hospitalización y los costos económicos. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio prospectivo, comparativo y simple ciego conformado por 42 pacientes intervenidos quirúrgicamente de artroplastía total de rodilla secundaria a artrosis degenerativa en el período comprendido entre Mayo de 2016 y Mayo de 2017. RESULTADOS: La distribución del dolor mostró diferencias significativas (p 0.0401) entre ambos grupos, indicando que la aplicación de analgesia mediante bomba continua controla este síntoma de manera temprana. El tiempo de hospitalización promedio fue diferente en los grupos (p = 0.001); se estimaron alrededor de 15 horas menos siguiendo el protocolo de bomba continua. Además, esta estrategia es globalmente más económica. CONCLUSIÓN: La bomba de infusión continua de analgesia compara da con la analgesia endovenosa reglada intermitente logró un mejor control del dolor, disminuyendo la percepción del mismo por parte del paciente, con una mejor tolerancia a la fisioterapia y reduciendo, en promedio, 15 horas de hospitalización y, por ende, los costos finales aproximados de la cirugía.

Intercondylar distal humerus fractures--surgical treatment and results.

INTRODUCTION: Controversy persists concerning the preferred treatment for intercondylar distal humerus fractures. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the clinical results after the surgical treatment of 40 intercondylar distal humerus fractures with an average follow-up of 3.9 years. METHODS: The fractures were classified following the AO/ASIF comprehensive classification. Eight patients presented multiplane fractures. Skeletal traction was used temporarily in two cases. The stabilization method was selected according to the fracture pattern, bone quality and associated lesions. Bone graft was used in seven cases. Fibrin-glue was used in two cases. Unilateral hinged external fixators were used in addition in four cases. Functional assessment was done according to the scoring system of the Orthopedic Trauma Association and additional parameters taken from the system of Jupiter. RESULTS: Final global results were excellent in 13 patients, good in 21, fair in four and poor in two. Complications included three non-unions, two heterotopic ossifications, two internal fixation failures and two lateral condyle resorptions (avascular necrosis). DISCUSSION: Final results are related to the severity of the initial trauma, time elapsed between the accident and definitive surgery, associated lesions, bone quality, precise reconstruction of a smooth and congruent joint surface, surgical technique, implants used, stability obtained and patient cooperation. The type, number and location of the osteosynthesis material must be selected according to the fracture pattern, bone quality and associated lesions.