Low-Dose Morphine Does Not Cause Sleepiness in COPD: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial.

RATIONALE: Regular, low-dose, sustained-release morphine is frequently prescribed for persistent breathlessness in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, effects on daytime sleepiness, perceived sleep quality and daytime function have not been rigorously investigated. OBJECTIVES: Determine the effects of regular, low-dose, sustained-release morphine on sleep parameters in COPD. METHODS: Pre-specified secondary analyses of validated sleep questionnaire data from a randomized trial of daily, low-dose, sustained -release morphine versus placebo over four weeks commencing at 8mg or 16mg/day with blinded up-titration over two weeks to a maximum of 32mg/day. Primary outcomes for these analyses were week-1 Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) responses on morphine versus placebo. Secondary outcomes included Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) scores (end of weeks 1 and 4), KSS and ESS beyond week-1 and associations between breathlessness, morphine, and questionnaire scores. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: 156 people were randomized. Week-1 sleepiness scores were not different on morphine versus placebo (∆ESS [95%CI] versus placebo: 8mg group: -0.59 [-1.99, 0.81], p=0.41; 16mg group: -0.72 [-2.33, 0.9], p=0.38; ∆KSS versus placebo: 8mg group: 0.11 [-0.7, 0.9], p=0.78; 16mg group: -0.41 [-1.31, 0.49], p=0.37). This neutral effect persisted at later timepoints. In addition, participants who reported reduced breathlessness with morphine at 4 weeks also had improvement in LSEQ domain scores including perceived sleep quality and daytime function. CONCLUSIONS: Regular, low-dose morphine does not worsen sleepiness when used for breathlessness in COPD. Individual improvements in breathlessness with morphine may be related to improvements in sleep.

Stepwise Add-On and Endotype-informed Targeted Combination Therapy to Treat Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

Rationale: Oral appliance therapy (OAT) is an effective treatment for many people with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, OSA pathogenesis is heterogeneous, and, in ∼50% of cases, OAT does not fully control OSA. Objectives: This study aimed to control OSA in individuals with an incomplete response to OAT alone by using additional targeted therapies informed by OSA endotype characterization. Methods: Twenty-three people with OSA (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI], 41 ± 19 events/h) not fully resolved (AHI, >10 events/h) with OAT alone were prospectively recruited. OSA endotypes were characterized pretherapy during a detailed physiology study night. Initially, an expiratory positive airway pressure (EPAP) valve and supine avoidance device therapy were added to target the impaired anatomical endotype. Those with residual OSA (AHI, >10 events/h) then received one or more nonanatomical interventions based on endotype characterization. This included O2 (4 L/min) to reduce high loop gain (unstable respiratory control) and 80/5 mg atomoxetine-oxybutynin to increase pharyngeal muscle activity. Finally, if required, OAT was combined with EPAP and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. Results: Twenty participants completed the study. OSA was successfully controlled (AHI, <10 events/h) with combination therapy in all but one participant (17 of 20 without CPAP). OAT plus EPAP and supine avoidance therapy treated OSA in 10 (50%) participants. OSA was controlled in five (25%) participants with the addition of O2 therapy, one with atomoxetine-oxybutynin, and one required O2 plus atomoxetine-oxybutynin. Two participants required CPAP for their OSA, and another was CPAP intolerant. Conclusions: These novel prospective findings highlight the potential of precision medicine to inform targeted combination therapy to treat OSA. Clinical trial registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12618001995268).

One Month Dosing of Atomoxetine plus Oxybutynin in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial.

Rationale: The combination of noradrenergic and antimuscarinic agents has recently been shown to improve upper-airway function and reduce obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity in short-term (⩽1 wk) proof-of-concept studies. Objectives: To determine the safety, tolerability, and potential efficacy of longer term use of different doses of the noradrenergic agent atomoxetine combined with the antimuscarinic oxybutynin (ato-oxy). Methods: Thirty-nine people with predominantly severe OSA received 80/5 mg ato-oxy, 40/5 mg ato-oxy, 40/2.5 mg ato-oxy, or placebo nightly for 30 days in a double-blind, randomized, parallel design. Participants completed three in-laboratory sleep studies (baseline, Night 1, and Night 30) to assess efficacy. Vital signs and objective measures of alertness and memory were assessed. In men, potential effects on prostate function were assessed using the International Prostate Symptom Score at baseline and Night 30. Potential adverse events were assessed during in-laboratory visits and via weekly phone calls. Results: Side effects were generally mild and consistent with known side-effect profiles of each individual drug (i.e., dose-dependent increases in dry mouth with oxybutynin). Heart rate increased by Night 30 in two active drug arms (mean ± standard deviation 8 ± 10 beats/min [P = 0.01] with 80/5 mg and 9 ± 14 beats/min [P = 0.02] with 40/2.5 mg vs. placebo). No clinically relevant changes in blood pressure, International Prostate Symptom Score, and measures of alertness and memory were observed between conditions. Apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) with 4% oxygen desaturation and hypoxic burden decreased by ∼50% with 80/5 mg ato-oxy from baseline but not versus placebo (e.g., AHI with 3% oxygen desaturation and AHI with 4% oxygen desaturation difference at Night 30 was -8.2 [95% confidence interval, -22.5 to 6.2] and -8.5 [95% confidence interval, -18.3 to 1.3] events/h, respectively). Conclusions: One month of nightly noradrenergic and antimuscarinic combination therapy was generally well tolerated, with a side-effect profile consistent with each agent alone, and was associated with an ∼50% reduction from baseline in a key OSA severity metric, the hypoxic burden with the highest dose combination. These findings highlight the potential to target noradrenergic and antimuscarinic mechanisms for OSA pharmacotherapy development. Clinical trial registered with www.anzctr.org.au (ACTRN 12619001153101).

Topical Potassium Channel Blockage Improves Pharyngeal Collapsibility: A Translational, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Potassium (K+) channel inhibition has been identified in animal models as a potential target to increase pharyngeal dilator muscle activity and to treat OSA. However, these findings have not yet been translated to humans. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does a novel, potent, tandem of P domains in a weak inward rectifying K+ channel (TWIK)-related acid-sensitive K+ (TASK) 1/3 channel antagonist, BAY2586116, improve pharyngeal collapsibility in pigs and humans, and secondarily, what is the optimal dose and method of topical application? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In the preclinical study, pharyngeal muscle activity and upper-airway collapsibility via transient negative pressure application was quantified in 13 anesthetized pigs during administration of placebo, 0.3 µg, 3 µg, and 30 µg nasal drops of BAY2586116. In the clinical study, 12 people with OSA instrumented with polysomnography equipment, an epiglottic pressure catheter, pneumotachograph, and nasal mask to monitor sleep and breathing performed up to four detailed upper airway sleep physiology studies. Participants received BAY2586116 (160 µg) or placebo nasal spray before sleep via a double-masked, randomized, crossover design. Most participants also returned for three additional overnight visits: (1) nasal drops (160 µg), (2) half-dose nasal spray (80 µg), and (3) direct endoscopic application (160 µg). The upper-airway critical closing pressure (Pcrit) during sleep was quantified at each visit. RESULTS: Consistent and sustained improvements in pharyngeal collapsibility to negative pressure were found with 3 and 30 µg of BAY2586116 vs placebo in pigs. Similarly, BAY2586116 improved pharyngeal collapsibility by an average of approximately 2 cm H2O vs placebo, regardless of topical application method and dose (P < .008, mixed model) in participants with OSA. INTERPRETATION: Acute topical application of BAY2586116 improves upper-airway collapsibility in anesthetized pigs and sleeping humans with OSA. These novel physiologic findings highlight the therapeutic potential to target potassium channel mechanisms to treat OSA. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT04236440; URL: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov.

The norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor reboxetine alone reduces obstructive sleep apnea severity: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Recent findings indicate that noradrenergic and muscarinic processes are crucial for pharyngeal muscle control during sleep. However, to date, reductions in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity have only been detected when noradrenergic agents are combined with an antimuscarinic. Accordingly, this study aimed to determine if reboxetine alone and combined with oxybutynin reduces OSA severity. The pathophysiological mechanisms underpinning the effects of these agents were also investigated via endotyping analysis. METHODS: Sixteen people (6 women) with OSA completed 3 polysomnograms (∼1-week washout) according to a double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-way crossover design across 2 sites. Single doses of 4 mg reboxetine, placebo, or 4 mg reboxetine + 5 mg oxybutynin were administered before sleep (order randomized). RESULTS: Reboxetine reduced the apnea-hypopnea index (primary outcome) by 5.4 (95% confidence interval -10.4 to -0.3) events/h, P = .03 (-24 ± 27% in men; -0.7 ± 32% in women). Oxybutynin did not cause additional reductions in apnea-hypopnea index. Reboxetine alone reduced the 4% oxygen desaturation index by (mean ± standard deviation) 5.2 ± 7.2 events/h and reboxetine+oxybutynin by 5.1 ± 10.6 events/h vs placebo, P = .02. Nadir oxygen saturation also increased by 7 ± 11% with reboxetine and 5 ± 9% with reboxetine+oxybutynin vs placebo, P = .01. Mechanistically, reboxetine and reboxetine+oxybutynin improved pharyngeal collapsibility and respiratory control (loop gain). Larger reductions in apnea-hypopnea index with reboxetine in men were associated with higher baseline loop gain. CONCLUSIONS: These findings show the first evidence that reboxetine alone reduces OSA severity. The data provide novel insight into the role of norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors on upper airway stability during sleep and are important to inform future pharmacotherapy development for OSA. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry; Name: Reboxetine and Combination Therapy with AD128 in Sleep Apnoea Trial: A Double-Blind, 3-Way Cross-Over Study; URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=374614&isReview=true; Identifier: ACTRN12620000662965. CITATION: Altree TJ, Aishah A, Loffler KA, Grunstein RR, Eckert DJ. The norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor reboxetine alone reduces obstructive sleep apnea severity: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover trial. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(1):85-96.

Predictors of weight loss in obese patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

PURPOSE: Consistent predictors of weight loss outcomes with very low-energy diets (VLEDs) in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) have not been identified. This study aimed to identify variables predictive of weight loss success in obese patients with OSA undertaking an intensive weight loss programme. METHODS: We analysed biological, psychological, and behavioural variables as potential predictors of weight loss in obese patients with OSA after a 2-month VLED followed by one of two 10-month weight loss maintenance diets. Actigraphy, in-lab polysomnography, urinary catecholamines, and various psychological and behavioural variables were measured at baseline, 2, and 12 months. Spearman's correlations analysed baseline variables with 2-month weight loss, and 2-month variables with 2-12 month-weight change. RESULTS: Forty-two patients completed the VLED and thirty-eight completed the maintenance diets. Actigraphy data revealed that late bedtime (rs = - 0.45, p = < 0.01) was correlated with 2-month weight loss. The change in the time that participants got out of bed (rise-time) from baseline to two months was also correlated with 2-month weight loss (rs = 0.36, p = 0.03). The Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite questionnaire (IWQOL) Public Distress domain (rs = - 0.54, p = < 0.01) and total (rs = - 0.38, p = 0.02) scores were correlated with weight loss maintenance from 2 to 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this small patient sample reveal correlations between actigraphy characteristics and weight loss in obese patients with OSA. We suggest the IWQOL may also be a useful clinical tool to identify OSA patients at risk of weight regain after initial weight loss. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This clinical trial was prospectively registered on 18/02/2013 with the Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12613000191796). PUBLIC REGISTRY TITLE: Sleep, Lifestyle, Energy, Eating, Exercise Program for the management of sleep apnea patients indicated for weight loss treatment: A randomised, controlled pilot study. URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=363680.

Vulnerability to Postoperative Complications in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Importance of Phenotypes.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common comorbidity in patients undergoing surgical procedures. Patients with OSA are at heightened risk of postoperative complications. Current treatments for OSA focus on alleviating upper airway collapse due to impaired upper airway anatomy. Although impaired upper airway anatomy is the primary cause of OSA, the pathogenesis of OSA is highly variable from person to person. In many patients, nonanatomical traits play a critical role in the development of OSA. There are 4 key traits or "phenotypes" that contribute to OSA pathogenesis. In addition to (1) impaired upper airway anatomy, nonanatomical contributors include: (2) impaired upper airway dilator muscle responsiveness; (3) low respiratory arousal threshold (waking up too easily to minor airway narrowing); and (4) unstable control of breathing (high loop gain). Each of these phenotypes respond differently to postoperative factors, such as opioid medications. An understanding of these phenotypes and their highly varied interactions with postoperative risk factors is key to providing safer personalized care for postoperative patients with OSA. Accordingly, this review describes the 4 OSA phenotypes, highlights how the impact on OSA severity from postoperative risk factors, such as opioids and other sedatives, is influenced by OSA phenotypes, and outlines how this knowledge can be applied to provide individualized care to minimize postoperative risk in surgical patients with OSA.