Drug-coated balloons for the treatment of stent edge restenosis.

BACKGROUND: Drug-coated balloon (DCB) is a device for treating patients with in-stent restenosis; however, there are scant data on its efficacy for stent edge restenosis (SER). This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of DCB use for treating SER compared with new-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. METHOD: From December 2013 to January 2019, patients who underwent DES implantation or DCB for SER were enrolled. Clinical outcomes were analyzed, and propensity score with matching was conducted. The primary outcome was target-vessel revascularization (TVR). The secondary outcomes were the incidence of all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and target lesion revascularization (TLR). RESULT: A total of 291 patients with SER were included: 160 were treated with DCB, and 131 with new-generation DES. DCB treatment for SER treatment was associated with a lower risk of TVR than DES [hazard ratio, 0.549; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.339-0.891] at a median follow-up of 1080 days (interquartile range; 729-1080 days). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to adjust for baseline clinical and lesion characteristics. After PSM, no significant difference in the risk of TVR was observed (hazard ratio, 0.965; 95% CI, 0.523-1.781). Similarly, the risk for all-cause death (hazard ratio, 0.507; 95% CI, 0.093-2.770), MACE (hazard ratio: 0.812; 95% CI, 0.451-1.462), and TLR (hazard ratio: 0.962; 95% CI, 0.505-1.833) were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: DCB treatment efficacy for SER was similar to that of new-generation DES after PSM. DCB is a significant alternative to obtain comparable results with new-generation DES for the treatment of SER.

Acute pulmonary thromboembolism after messenger RNA vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019: A case report.

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is defined as thrombosis after inoculation of adenovirus vector vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). VITT rarely occurs with messenger RNA vaccines, and the use of heparin for VITT is also controversial. A 74-year-old female patient with no risk factors for thrombosis was brought to our hospital after loss of consciousness. Nine days before admission, she had received the third vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 (mRNA1273, Moderna). Immediately after transport, cardiopulmonary arrest occurred, prompting extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Pulmonary angiography showed translucent images of both pulmonary arteries, resulting in the diagnosis of acute pulmonary thromboembolism. Unfractionated heparin was administered, but D-dimer subsequently became negative. Pulmonary thrombosis remained in large volume, indicating that heparin was ineffective. Treatment was shifted to anticoagulant therapy using argatroban, which increased D-dimer level and improved respiratory status. The patient was successfully weaned from ECMO and ventilator. Anti-platelet factor 4 antibody examined after treatment initiation showed negative results; however, VITT was considered as an underlying condition because of the time of onset after vaccination, the ineffectiveness of heparin, and the absence of other causes of thrombosis. In case heparin is not effective, argatroban can be an alternative therapy against thrombosis. Learning objective: During the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, treatment with vaccine against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has been widely performed. Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia is the most common thrombosis after adenovirus vector vaccines. However, thrombosis can also occur after messenger RNA vaccination. Though commonly used for thrombosis, heparin may be ineffective. Non-heparin anticoagulants should be considered.

Oozing-type rupture caused by right ventricular intramural hematoma after right ventricular infarction.

An 81-year-old man was admitted to the hospital because of decreased level of consciousness. He had bradycardia (27 beats/min). Electrocardiography showed ST-segment elevation in leads II, III, and aVF and ST-segment depression in leads aVL, V1. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) visualized reduced motion of the left ventricular (LV) inferior wall and right ventricular (RV) free wall. Coronary angiography revealed occlusion of the right coronary artery. A primary percutaneous coronary intervention was successfully performed with temporary pacemaker backup. On the third day, the sinus rhythm recovered, and the temporary pacemaker was removed. On the fifth day, a sudden cardiac arrest occurred. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed. TTE showed a high-echoic effusion around the right ventricle, indicating a hematoma. The drainage was ineffective. He died on the eighth day. An autopsy showed the infarcted lesion and an intramural hematoma in the RV. However, no definite perforation of the myocardium was detected. The hematoma extended to the epicardium surface, indicative of oozing-type RV rupture induced by RV infarction. The oozing-type rupture induced by RV infarction might develop asymptomatically without influence on the vital signs of the patient. Frequent echocardiographic evaluation is essential in cases of RV infarction taking care of silent oozing-type rupture. Learning objective: Inferior left ventricular infarction sometimes complicates right ventricular (RV) infarction. The typical manifestations of RV infarction include low blood pressure, low cardiac output, and elevated right atrium pressure. Although the frequency is low, fatal complications of oozing-type RV rupture might progress asymptomatically. Frequent echocardiographic screening is necessary to detect them.

Long-term outcomes of intermediate coronary stenosis in patients undergoing hemodialysis after deferred revascularization based on fractional flow reserve.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the long-term outcomes of patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) after deferred revascularization based on fractional flow reserve (FFR). BACKGROUND: FFR is a practical technique for assessing the functional severity of intermediate coronary stenosis. Prior research has revealed a satisfactory outcome in patients after the deferral of percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary lesions based on FFR measurement. However, little research has been conducted focusing on patients undergoing HD. METHODS: The retrospective study comprised 225 consecutive patients with FFR assessment and deferred revascularization between January 2016 and December 2019. Based on a deferral cutoff FFR value of >0.80, we assessed the differences in all-cause death, major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), and target vessel failure (TVF) between the HD (n = 69) and non-HD groups (n = 156) during a mean ± standard deviation routine follow-up of 32.2 ± 13.4 months. RESULTS: Although the HD group had significantly higher rates of diabetes mellitus than the non-HD group (53.6% vs. 37.2%, p = 0.021), there were no significant differences in sex, left ventricular ejection fraction, or other risk factors between the groups, nor with respect to stenosis diameter or mean FFR. The HD group had a significantly higher incidence of TVF than the non-HD group (34.8% vs. 14.1%, p < 0.001), as well as a significantly higher risk of all-cause death and MACEs. CONCLUSIONS: The study revealed that deferred revascularization in coronary lesions with an FFR value of >0.80 in patients undergoing HD was associated with poor outcomes. Therefore, it is important to carefully monitor patients with intermediate coronary stenosis undergoing HD.

Impaired Right Atrial Reserve Function in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have multiple cardiac reserve limitations during exercise. However, no data are available regarding right atrial (RA) reserve capacity in HFpEF. The aim of this study was to determine the association of RA reserve impairments with right ventricular function and exercise capacity in HFpEF and to explore its diagnostic value. METHODS: Patients with HFpEF (n = 89) and control subjects without heart failure (n = 108) underwent bicycle exercise echocardiography. RA reservoir, conduit, and booster pump strain at rest and during exercise were measured using speckle-tracking echocardiography. In a subset, simultaneous expired gas analysis was performed to measure peak oxygen consumption. RESULTS: At rest, RA reservoir strain was lower in patients with HFpEF than control subjects (27.0 ± 17.1% vs 38.6 ± 17.1%, P < .0001), while RA conduit and booster pump strain were similar between groups. During peak exercise, patients with HFpEF displayed marked reserve limitations in RA reservoir and booster pump function compared with control subjects, and the differences remained significant even after adjusting for confounding factors. During peak exercise, RA reservoir and booster pump strain were correlated with right ventricular systolic function. Lower RA booster pump strain during exercise was also weakly associated with lower cardiac output (r = 0.34, P < .0001) and reduced peak oxygen consumption (r = 0.47, P < .0001). RA reservoir strain during exercise had incremental diagnostic value to differentiate patients with HFpEF from control subjects over the established HFpEF diagnostic algorithms and left-sided strain parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Limitations in RA reservoir and booster pump function during exercise are present in patients with HFpEF, and the severity is associated with right ventricular systolic reserve, poor cardiac output, and depressed exercise capacity. Exercise RA strain assessment may help in the diagnosis of HFpEF.

Cardiac Power Output Is Independently and Incrementally Associated With Adverse Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac power output is a measure of cardiac performance, and its prognostic significance has been shown in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction. Patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction may have altered cardiac performance, but the prognostic relevance of cardiac power output is unknown. This study sought to determine the association between cardiac power output and clinical outcomes in HF with preserved ejection fraction and to compare its prognostic effect to other measures of cardiac performance including ventricular-arterial coupling and mechanical efficiency. METHODS: Cardiac power output normalized to left ventricular mass was assessed by echocardiography in 408 patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction. Load-independent contractility (end-systolic elastance), arterial elastance, its coupling (arterial elastance/end-systolic elastance), left ventricular global longitudinal strain, and mechanical efficiency (stroke work/pressure-volume area) were also estimated noninvasively. The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular mortality or HF hospitalization. RESULTS: The primary composite outcome occurred in 84 patients during a median follow-up of 19.4 months. There was a dose-dependent association between cardiac power output and the composite outcomes, in which patients with the lowest tertile of cardiac power output had >3-fold risk than those with the highest tertile (hazard ratio, 3.04 [95% CI, 1.66-5.57]; P=0.0003). In a multivariable model, lower cardiac power output was independently associated with adverse outcomes (hazard ratio, 0.70 per 1 SD [95% CI, 0.49-0.97]; P=0.03). In contrast, left ventricular size, end-systolic elastance, arterial elastance, arterial elastance/end-systolic elastance ratio, and left ventricular mechanical efficiency were not associated with outcomes. Cardiac power output provided an incremental prognostic effect over the model based on clinical (age, gender, diastolic blood pressure, and atrial fibrillation) and echocardiographic markers (left atrial size, pulmonary pressures, global longitudinal strain, and the ratio of early diastolic mitral inflow velocity to early diastolic mitral annular tissue velocity; P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction, cardiac power output was independently and incrementally associated with adverse outcomes whereas other markers of cardiac performance were not.

The H2FPEF and HFA-PEFF algorithms for predicting exercise intolerance and abnormal hemodynamics in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Exercise intolerance is a primary manifestation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and is associated with abnormal hemodynamics and a poor quality of life. Two multiparametric scoring systems have been proposed to diagnose HFpEF. This study sought to determine the performance of the H2FPEF and HFA-PEFF scores for predicting exercise capacity and echocardiographic findings of intracardiac pressures during exercise in subjects with dyspnea on exertion referred for bicycle stress echocardiography. In a subset, simultaneous expired gas analysis was performed to measure the peak oxygen consumption (VO2). Patients with HFpEF (n = 83) and controls without HF (n = 104) were enrolled. The H2FPEF score was obtainable for all patients while the HFA-PEFF score could not be calculated for 23 patients (feasibility 88%). Both H2FPEF and HFA-PEFF scores correlated with a higher E/e' ratio (r = 0.49 and r = 0.46), lower systolic tricuspid annular velocity (r = - 0.44 and = - 0.24), and lower cardiac output (r = - 0.28 and r = - 0.24) during peak exercise. Peak VO2 and exercise duration decreased with an increase in H2FPEF scores (r = - 0.40 and r = - 0.32). The H2FPEF score predicted a reduced aerobic capacity (AUC 0.71, p = 0.0005), but the HFA-PEFF score did not (p = 0.07). These data provide insights into the role of the H2FPEF and HFA-PEFF scores for predicting exercise intolerance and abnormal hemodynamics in patients presenting with exertional dyspnea.