Maternal COVID-19 Serological Changes-Comparison between Seroconversion Rate in First and Third Trimesters of Pregnancy and Subsequent Obstetric Complications: A Cohort Study.

Pregnant women are especially vulnerable to respiratory diseases. We aimed to study seroconversion rates during pregnancy in a cohort of consecutive pregnancies tested in the first and third trimesters and to compare the maternal and obstetric complications in the women who seroconverted in the first trimester and those who did so in the third. This was an observational cohort study carried out at the Hospital Universitario de Torrejón, in Madrid, Spain, during the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. All consecutive singleton pregnancies with a viable fetus attending their 11-13-week scan between 1 January and 15 May 2020 were included and seropositive women for SARS-CoV2 were monthly follow up until delivery. Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 (IgA and IgG) were analyzed on stored serum samples obtained from first- and third-trimester routine antenatal bloods in 470 pregnant women. Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 were detected in 31 (6.6%) women in the first trimester and in 66 (14.0%) in the third trimester, including 48 (10.2%) that were negative in the first trimester (seroconversion during pregnancy). Although the rate of infection was significantly higher in the third versus the first trimester (p = 0.003), no significant differences in maternal or obstetric complications were observed in women testing positive in the first versus the third trimester.

Early fetal morphological evaluation (11-13 + 6 weeks) accomplished exclusively by transabdominal imaging and following routine midtrimester fetal ultrasound scan recommendations. Since when can it be performed?

Objectives: To establish the best timing for the realization of first-trimester-morphologic-evaluation, following routine midtrimester fetal-ultrasound-scan-recommendations (RFUSR), by performing exclusive transabdominal exploration, and to determine the sensitivity of the mentioned scan for diagnosis of major structural abnormalities.Method: Prospective observational study with 512 pregnant women with singleton gestations (438 low-risk, 74 high-risk) was conducted. Early fetal morphological evaluation (EFME) is performed in line with RFUSR (18-22 weeks) (ISUOG 2010) and a check-list structured evaluation was followed, between 11-13 + 6 weeks. Its performance is assessed in the correct identification of normal fetal anatomy, and its effectiveness in the detection of structural defectsResults: Five hundred and four pregnant women were evaluated, of which, 58.3% EFME are considered complete fetal anatomical surveys. Complete fetal anatomical surveys scans rise from 23.1% at 11-11 + 6 weeks to 63.8% at 13 + 3-13 weeks, with a clear turning point at 12 + 6-13 + 3 weeks (63.8%) (p < .05). From 12 + 6-13 + 3 weeks only renal (26.3%) and cardiac assessments (31.6%) present an inconclusive evaluation greater than 20%. Body mass index (23.9 versus 29.8) and estimated fetal weight (63 versus 86.7 g) influence EMFE's ability of identifying fetal structures (p < .05). EMFE presents sensitivity for the identification of structural malformations of 83.3% (20/24).Conclusions: From 12 + 6 weeks of gestation onwards, a complete fetal morphological evaluation can be performed in 63.8% of cases following the routine midtrimester fetal ultrasound scan recommendations (ISUOG's 20 weeks scan).

A comparable rate of levator ani muscle injury in operative vaginal delivery (forceps and vacuum) according to the characteristics of the instrumentation.

INTRODUCTION: Forceps delivery is associated with a high rate of levator ani muscle (LAM) trauma (avulsion) at 35%-65% whereas data on avulsion rates after vacuum delivery vary greatly. Nevertheless, a common characteristic of all previous studies carried out to evaluate the association between instrumental deliveries (forceps and vacuum) and LAM avulsion, is the fact that characteristics of the instrumentation have not been described or evaluated. The objective of this study is to compare the rate of LAM avulsion between forceps and vacuum deliveries according to the characteristics of the instrumentation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective, observational study, including 263 nulliparous women, who underwent an instrumental delivery with either Malmström vacuum or Kielland forceps. The characteristics of the instrumentation, position (anterior position and other position) and height of the fetal head at the moment of instrumentation (low instrumentation [vertex at +2 station] and mid-instrumentation [head is involved but leading part above +2 station]) were assessed. Evaluation of LAM avulsion was performed at 6 months postpartum by three-/four-dimensional transperineal ultrasound. Using the multi-view mode, a complete avulsion was diagnosed when the abnormal muscle insertion was identified in all three central slices, that is, in the plane of minimal hiatal dimensions and the 2.5-mm and 5.0-mm slices cranial to this one. To detect a 30% or 15% difference in the LAM injury rate, with 80% power and 5% α-error, we needed, respectively 42 and 99 women per study group. RESULTS: In all, 263 nulliparous individuals have been evaluated (162 vacuum deliveries, 101 forceps deliveries). Instrumentation in an occipito-anterior position was more frequent in vacuum deliveries (75.3% vs 56.4%, P = .002), whereas other positions were more frequent in the forceps deliveries group (24.7% vs 43.6%). No statistically significant differences were noted regarding the height of the fetal head at the moment of instrumentation. No statistically significant differences were found in the presence of LAM avulsion (41.4% vs 38.6%) between vacuum and forceps deliveries. The univariate analysis of the crude odds ratio was 1.17, 95% CI 0.67-1.98, P = .70 for the avulsion of the LAM and the multivariate of the adjusted OR 0.90, 95% CI; 0.53-1.55, P = .71. CONCLUSIONS: We consider that, in our population, LAM avulsion rate should not be a factor taken into account when choosing the type of instrumentation (Malmström vacuum or Kielland forceps) in an operative delivery.

A simple model to predict the complicated operative vaginal deliveries using vacuum or forceps.

BACKGROUND: Complicated operative vaginal deliveries are associated with high neonatal morbidity and maternal trauma, especially if the procedure is unsuccessful and a cesarean delivery is needed. The decision to perform an operative vaginal delivery has traditionally been based on a subjective assessment by digital vaginal examination combined with the clinical expertise of the obstetrician. Currently there is no method for objectively quantifying the likelihood of successful delivery. Intrapartum ultrasound has been introduced in clinical practice to help predict the progression and final method of delivery. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare predictive models for identifying complicated operative vaginal deliveries (vacuum or forceps) based on intrapartum transperineal ultrasound in nulliparous women. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a prospective cohort study in nulliparous women at term with singleton pregnancies and full dilatation who underwent intrapartum transperineal ultrasound evaluation prior to operative vaginal delivery. Managing obstetricians were blinded to the ultrasound data. Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound (angle of progression, progression distance, and midline angle) was performed immediately before instrument application, both at rest and concurrently with pushing. Intrapartum evaluation of fetal biometric parameters (estimated fetal weight, head circumference, and biparietal diameter) was also carried out. An operative vaginal delivery was classified as complicated when 1 or more of the following complications occurred: ≥3 tractions needed; third- to fourth-degree perineal tear; severe bleeding during episiotomy repair (decrease of ≥2.5 g/dL in the hemoglobin level); or significant traumatic neonatal lesion (subdural-intracerebral hemorrhage, epicranial subaponeurotic hemorrhage, skeletal injuries, injuries to spine and spinal cord, or peripheral and cranial nerve injuries). Six predictive models were evaluated (information available in Table 2). RESULTS: We recruited 84 nulliparous patients, of whom 5 were excluded because of the difficulty of adequately evaluating the biparietal diameter and head circumference. A total of 79 nulliparous patients were studied (47 vacuum deliveries, 32 forceps deliveries) with 13 cases in the occiput-posterior position. We identified 31 cases of complicated operative vaginal deliveries (19 vacuum deliveries and 12 forceps deliveries). No differences were identified in obstetric, neonatal, or intrapartum characteristics between the 2 study groups (operative uncomplicated vaginal delivery vs operative complicated vaginal delivery), with the following exceptions: estimated fetal weight (3243 ± 425 g vs 3565 ± 330 g; P = .001), biparietal diameter (93.2 ± 2.1 vs 95.2 ± 2.3 mm; P = .001), head circumference (336 ± 12 vs 348 ± 6.4 mm; P = .001), sex (female 62.5% vs 29.0%; P = .010), newborn weight (3258 ± 472 g vs 3499 ± 383 g; P = .027), and number of tractions (median, interquartile range) (1 [1-2] vs 4 [3-5]; P < .0005). To predict complicated operative deliveries, all 6 of the studied models presented an area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve between 0.863 and 0.876 (95% confidence intervals, 0.775-0.950 and 0.790-0.963; P < .0005). The results of the study met the criteria of interpretability and parsimony (simplicity), allowing us to identify a binary logistic regression model based on the angle of progression and head circumference; this model has an area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve of 0.876 (95% confidence interval, 0.790-0.963; P < .0005) and a calibration slope B of 0.984 (95% confidence interval, 0.0.726-1.243; P < .0005). CONCLUSION: The combination of the angle of progression and the head circumference can predict 87% of complicated operative vaginal deliveries and can be performed in the delivery room.

Intra and interobserver variability of intrapartum transperineal ultrasound measurements with contraction and pushing.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the inter- and intraobserver correlation of the different intrapartum-transperineal-ultrasound-parameters(ITU) (angle of progression (AoP), progression-distance (PD), head-direction (HD), midline-angle (MLA) and head-perineum distance (HPD)) with contraction and pushing. We evaluated 28 nulliparous women at full dilatation under epidural analgesia. We performed a transperineal ultrasound evaluating AoP and PD in the longitudinal plane, and MLA and HPD in the transverse plane. Interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) with 95% CIs and Bland-Altman analysis were used to assess intra- and interobserver measurement's repeatability. The ICC of the ITU for the same observer was adequate for all the parameters (p < .005) AoP 0.98 (95%CI, 0.96-0.99), PD 0.98 (95%CI, 0.97-0.99), MLA 0.99 (95%CI, 0.97-0.99), HPD 0.96 (95%CI, 0.88-0.99). The ICC of the ITU for interobserver was: AoP 0.93 (95%CI, 0.79-0.98), PD 0.92 (95%CI, 0.76-0.97), MLA 0.77 (95%CI, 0.42-0.92), HPD 0.47 (95%CI, -0.12-0.8). The HD had an interobserver correlation of 0.53 (95%CI, 0.1-0.9) (Kappa C). The mean difference of the AoP was 2.42°, of the PD 1 mm and 0.28° MLA (Bland-Altman test). ITU has an adequate intra- and interobserver correlation for its use with contraction and pushing under epidural analgesia. Impact statement What is already known on this subject: The intrapartum transperineal ultrasound parameters can be used with contraction and pushing under epidural analgesia. What the results of this study add to what we know: ITU may be used to evaluate the difficulty of instrumental delivery/to evaluate the difficulty of instrumentation in vaginal operative deliveries and this study concludes that ITU is reproducible during uterine contraction with pushing. What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research: Therefore, ITU could be used without difficulty with an adequate intra- and interobserver correlation for the prediction of instrumentation difficulty in operative vaginal deliveries.

Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound used to predict cases of complicated operative (vacuum and forceps) deliveries in nulliparous women.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to investigate the predictive value of intrapartum transperineal ultrasound in the identification of complicated operative (vacuum or forceps) deliveries in nulliparous women. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective observational study of nulliparous women with an indication for operative delivery who underwent intrapartum transperineal ultrasound before fetal extraction. Managing obstetricians were blinded to the ultrasound data. Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound was performed immediately before blade application, both at rest and concurrently with contractions and active pushing. Operative delivery was classified as complicated when one or more of the following situations occurred: three or more tractions; a third-/fourth-degree perineal tear; significant bleeding during the episiotomy repair; major tear or significant traumatic neonatal lesion. RESULTS: A total of 143 nulliparous women were included in the study (82 vacuum-assisted deliveries and 61 forceps-assisted deliveries), with 20 fetuses in occiput posterior position. Forty-seven operative deliveries were classified as complicated deliveries (28 vacuum-assisted deliveries, 19 forceps-assisted deliveries). No differences in obstetric, intrapartum or neonatal characteristics were observed between the study groups, with the following exceptions: birthweight (3229 ± 482 uncomplicated deliveries vs. 3623 ± 406 complicated deliveries; p < 0.003) and number of vacuum tractions (1.4 uncomplicated deliveries, 4.5 complicated deliveries; p < 0.0005). The strongest predictors of a complicated delivery, using the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC), were the angle of progression with active pushing (AoP2) (AUC 86.9%) and the progression distance with active pushing (PD2) (AUC 74.5%). The optimal cut-off value for predicting a difficult operative delivery was an AoP2 of 153.5° (sensitivity 95.2%; false-positive rate 5.9%) or PD2 of 58.5 mm (sensitivity 95.2%; false-positive rate 7.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The sonographic parameters AoP2 and PD2 can be used to predict cases of complicated operative deliveries in nulliparous women.

Intrapartum translabial ultrasound with pushing used to predict the difficulty in vacuum-assisted delivery of fetuses in non-occiput posterior position.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim is to evaluate the capacity of intrapartum translabial ultrasound (ITU) with pushing in the prediction of difficulty of fetal extraction in vacuum assisted deliveries. Prospective, observational study performed (2/2015-8/2015) on 75 nulliparous women, ≥37 weeks with singleton pregnancies at full dilatation who had ITU-with-pushing performed, previous to vacuum-placement for fetal extraction. Working on the translabial sagittal-plane, we assessed: Angle-Progression (AoP), Progression-Distance (PD) and Head-Direction (HD); in the axial plane we evaluated: Midline-Angle (MLA) and Head-Perineum-Distance (HPD). Vacuum extractions were classified as easy-difficulty (ED) (≤3 vacuum-pulls), difficult-unsuccessful (DD) (>3 vacuum-pulls). We did not assess occipito-posterior-presentations. RESULTS: Seventy nulliparous were studied (44-ED,26-DD). We observed no differences in obstetric, neonatal or intrapartum characteristics between the two study groups, with the following exceptions: newborn weight (3272 ± 438 g versus 3540 ± 372 g; p = 0.011) and number of vacuum-pulls (1.4-ED-vs-4.4-DD; p < 0.0005). AoP-pushing was 143.9° ± 14.6° in ED and 115.1°± 12.9° in DD (p < 0.0005); Head-Up was 79.5% versus 38.4% (p < 0.0005); PD-Pushing was 42.7 ± 11.3 mm versus 30.4 ± 9.8 mm (p < 0.0005); MLA-Pushing was 27.6°± 26.6° versus 57.5°±26.5°(p=0.025); HPD-Pushing was 40.8 ± 10.0 mm versus 47.4 ± 10.9 mm (p = 0.039). CONCLUSION: We identified that the presence of an AoP-Pushing > 128° predicts an Easy-Vacuum-Delivery (≤3 Vacuum-Pulls) in >85% of cases (Sen 80%-FPR 9.3%).

Utility of intrapartum transperineal ultrasound to predict cases of failure in vacuum extraction attempt and need of cesarean section to complete delivery.

OBJECTIVES: We aim to evaluate the predictive capacity of intrapartum transperineal ultrasound (ITU) to predict cases of failure in fetal extraction in operative deliveries with vacuum. Prospective, observational study performed on 61 nulliparous women, ≥ 37 weeks, singleton pregnancies at full dilatation who underwent transperineal ultrasound before placement of vacuum to complete fetal extraction. Working on the transperineal longitudinal plane, we evaluated the following: Angle of Progression (AoP), Progression Distance (PD) and head direction. In the transverse plane, midline angle (MLA) and head-perineum distance were assessed. Vacuum extractions were classified as easy (EG) (three or less vacuum pulls), difficult (DG) (more than three vacuum pulls) or impossible (IG) (delivery completed by cesarean section). Occipito-posterior presentations were not evaluated. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were studied (26-EG, 19-DG and 7-IG). No differences in obstetric, intrapartum or neonatal characteristics were observed between study groups, with the following exceptions: weight at birth (3147 g-EG, 3523 g-DG and 3588 g-IG) and number of vacuum pulls (1.4-EG, 4.4-DG and 4.1-IG; p < 0.0005). The AoP pushing was 133.1° ± 13.6-EG, 112.8° ± 12.8-DG and 99.1° ± 8.9-IG (p < 0.0005); "head-up" direction was identified in 84.6% of EG, 36.8% of DG and 28.6% of IG (p < 0.001); PD were 37.0 ± 10.4 mm, 33.3 ± 23.3 mm and 20.8 ± 9.5 mm (p < 0.0005); MLA were 35.0° ± 19.6, 55.3° ± 24.4 and 76.0° ± 23.2 (p = 0.003); and head-perineum distances were 41.8 ± 6.6 mm, 49.2 ± 9.8 mm and 48.0 ± 3.4 mm (p = 0.072), respectively. CONCLUSION: We have observed that the presence of an AoP with pushing <105°, a PD <25 mm, a "head-down" direction and a >45° MLA are very unfavorable ITU parameters which can be used to identify cases of high risk of fetal extraction failure in vacuum-assisted deliveries.

Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound as a predictor of instrumentation difficulty with vacuum-assisted delivery in primiparous women.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the capability of different intrapartum transperineal ultrasound parameters to predict the difficulty of vacuum extraction. This is a prospective observational study performed between 04/2012 and 03/2013 on 72 primiparous-women, ≥37-weeks with singleton pregnancies at full dilatation that underwent transperineal ultrasound before vacuum placement for foetal extraction. Working in a transperineal longitudinal plane we evaluated: progression-angle, progression-distance and head direction; in a transverse plane: midline-angle and head-perineum distance. The vacuum extractions were classified as easy-group (EG) (≤3 vacuum pulls), difficult/impossible-group (DG)(≥4 pulls). Occiput-posterior presentations were not assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-two (52) patients were studied (26 patients per study group). No differences were observed in obstetric, neonatal or intrapartum characteristics between the study groups, with the following exceptions: new-born (NB) weight (3147 g versus 3540 g) and the number of vacuum pulls (1.4 EG versus 4.3 DG; p < 0.0005). The progression angle was 133.1° (123°-143°) in EG and 109.2° (97.2°-121.2°) in DG (p < 0.0005); up direction of foetal head was 88% versus 34.5% (p < 0.0005); progression distance was 37 mm (26.6-47.4) versus 29.9 mm (8.8-51; p = 0.003); midline angle was 35° (15.4°-54.6°) versus 59.7° (34.5°-84.9°; p = 0.0005); head-perineum distance was 41.9 mm (35.2-48.6) versus 48.9 mm (40.5-57.3; p = 0.017). The area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve for the progression angle was 0.9 (95%CI, 0.82-0.99), and the midline angle was 0.8 (95%CI, 0.67-0.92). CONCLUSION: If previous to the placement of the vacuum cup the progression angle is ≤120°, the foetal head direction is horizontal or down, and the midline angle is ≥35°, there is an 85% chance that the delivery will require more than 4 vacuum pulls.